Philips OLED950 vs Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW)

Direct comparison

OLED950 / OLED+

The Frame Pro / LS03HW

Info

Available screen sizes: 65”77”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.4

7.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    8.8

    6.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.8

    6.5

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.5

    6.9

  • Gaming on console

    9.5

    8.9

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.5

    8.4

  • Watching in bright light

    7.3

    6.5

  • Utility functions

    6.5

    7.7

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    8.2

    6.4

Advantages

  • Amazing peak brightness, exceeding 2000 nits on test screens (Tandem OLED panel)

  • Perfect black and infinite contrast

  • Support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Excellent gaming features: support for 4K@120Hz, VRR, ALLM, and 144 Hz mode

  • Very low input lag

  • Impressive 4-sided Ambilight system

  • Google TV system offering access to a vast library of apps

  • Backlit remote, charged via USB-C connector

  • Wall picture styling: interchangeable frames

  • Generous accessory package: wall mount and Wiralles One Connect included

  • Art Store - the best art scans on the market

  • Matte screen finish - no reflections

  • High brightness of 850 to 900 nits

  • Wide colour gamut (QLED)

  • Many gaming features: VRR, ALLM, refresh rate up to 240 Hz, Game Motion Plus

  • Smooth and clear motion: relatively low motion blur for a VA panel

  • Tizen operating system, rich in modern features

Disadvantages

No like
  • Only two HDMI ports in standard 2.1

  • Remote control communicating via infrared (requires aiming at the receiver)

  • Very high price compared to market competition

  • Sound quality noticeably weaker than in the lower model OLED910

  • Slight issues with posterisation

  • Poor black levels for a screen from the "Neo QLED" family (edge-lit backlight)

  • Art Store requires a monthly subscription (you can get around this by uploading your own photos 😉)

  • Poor viewing angles (they could be better for a stronger picture-on-the-wall effect)

  • High input lag when using the Wireless One Connect module

Our verdict

Philips OLED950 is undoubtedly a technological showcase that redefines in many ways what we can expect from a home entertainment centre. The use of the groundbreaking Tandem OLED panel means we are at an absolute peak in terms of picture quality. The combination of infinite black and perfect contrast with brightness that can exceed the magical barrier of 2000 nits in HDR mode creates effects that are, at times, breathtaking. Whether we are watching films in a sunlit living room or gaming at night with the support of a 4-sided Ambilight system, the experience is simply phenomenal. This is a complete screen that will satisfy both the cinephile seeking fidelity in Dolby Vision and the gamer demanding 144 Hz and perfect motion response.

However, this admiration for the raw performance of the panel mingles with a certain feeling of inadequacy when we look at the manufacturer's promises regarding image processing. Philips heavily promoted the use of the "dual" P5 processor, suggesting that it would be a remedy for all the woes of digital signal processing. However, reality proved to be less revolutionary. In our tests, the difference compared to models equipped with the standard, single P5 chip was almost imperceptible in everyday use. Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions or posterisation in difficult scenes, although rare, still occur. Given the astronomical price of this model, we were hoping for a significantly greater quality leap in this aspect that would justify such a high positioning of the equipment. The issue of cost-effectiveness thus becomes the biggest problem of this otherwise outstanding television. When we look at the market with a cool eye, the situation of the 950 model becomes complicated. It’s not even about the strong competition from cheaper flagship models like LG G5 or Samsung S95F, but about the "fratricidal" battle within Philips' own offerings. It turns out that the lower-positioned OLED910 model offers us practically the same brilliant picture generated by an identical panel. Moreover, the 910 model wins in the audio department, offering an integrated soundbar from Bowers & Wilkins, which is simply absent in the pricier 950 model in favour of a different design. We thus face a paradox: we get the same picture and worse sound, yet we must pay significantly more. Therefore, although the OLED950 is a fantastic screen, in 2025 the title of "Best Philips Television" and our recommendation goes to the model OLED910.

The Frame Pro 2026 makes sense primarily when the TV is meant to look good in the living room and not be another large black slab on the wall. And here Samsung still does something that most manufacturers cannot reproduce as well. Flush mounting, interchangeable bezels, Art Mode, a matte finish and the wireless One Connect make it so that, when properly hung, The Frame Pro can actually look more like a piece of décor than AV equipment. In our view, it is the best-executed TV of this kind on the market. Importantly, you do not simply pay for the looks at the expense of everyday use. The Frame Pro is bright, the matte finish deals very well with reflections, so it performs really well in a well-lit living room. Colours are vivid, motion handling is very good, and there are surprisingly many gaming features for a TV that is, first and foremost, supposed to "look better".

More questions arise when you consider the "Pro" suffix and its classification as a Neo QLED screen. You might expect a big jump in picture quality compared with the regular The Frame, but in practice it is not that large. The TV uses Mini-LED backlighting and local dimming, but the dimming zones are located at the edges of the screen. That is a completely different approach from more advanced Mini-LED models, where the backlight works across the whole surface of the panel. In bright, colourful scenes this is not a major problem. It gets worse in the evening, especially in films with many dark shots. Then you can see that black levels and backlight control are noticeably weaker than in the best Mini-LED TVs. This is where it becomes most apparent that "Pro" does not, in this case, mean top-tier picture quality.

An interesting alternative is the Samsung S99H. It has a very design-led character, but in terms of picture it already goes much further. Of course it also costs significantly more, so it is not a direct replacement but rather an option for someone who wants to combine both worlds without major compromises. So is it worth buying The Frame Pro 2026? In our view yes, but only if you know what you are paying for. The greatest strengths of this TV are its looks, Art Mode, very good performance in a bright living room and the wireless One Connect. If that is what you are after, The Frame Pro is a very interesting proposition. However, if the main argument for paying extra is markedly better picture quality, we are less convinced. It is simply a better, more refined The Frame, not a full-fledged rival to the best Mini-LEDs.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
USB-C, Micro-HDMI
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Premium
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Height adjustment
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand, Wall bracket, One Connect Box

Contrast and black detail

10/10

5.3/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 24 (1 x 24)

Contrast:

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

∞:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,400:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,250:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,900:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,750:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,900:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

There is not much to elaborate on here. As with every OLED television, the black and contrast quality in the Philips OLED950 is simply perfect. Regardless of the film scene being watched, night shots, or materials in a 2.39:1 aspect ratio with black bars, you can count on perfect black without any halos or brightening. This is one of the greatest advantages of OLED technology over LCD and Mini-LED televisions. There is no game of local dimming algorithms or compromises here. Black always remains black. The only thing we noticed in our tests is the helicopter scene from the film Sicario 2. The OLED950 quite clearly highlights details in the shadows. However, this is a feature of our test sample, more related to the character of image reproduction than to the black quality itself. In this regard, everything here is at the highest level.

The Frame Pro formally belongs to the Neo QLED family, so it features a Mini-LED backlight. But it’s not the same kind of Mini-LED we know from most TVs in this series. Instead of a large number of zones placed behind the screen, this set has only a single row of zones along the edge. In practice it’s an edge-lit design that simply uses smaller LEDs. And unfortunately this becomes quite apparent in blacks. There is simply too little local dimming for the TV to cope well with more demanding scenes. In our measurements contrast most often fell in the range of 3000–5000:1, so it’s hard to speak of the kind of contrast typical of more sophisticated Mini-LED designs.

This is most visible when individual bright elements appear against a dark background. A larger portion of the picture lights up with them, which makes the blacks noticeably shallower, even navy blue. A scene from Sicario 2 illustrates this well. With the zones placed like this, the TV simply doesn’t have the precision to render it any other way. The Frame Pro uses Mini-LED, but its black performance is much closer to simpler designs. It’s a shame, because this was precisely the aspect we complained about most last year.

HDR effect quality

8.7/10

6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 99.7%, Bt.2020: 82.4%
DCI P3: 95.0%, Bt.2020: 71.8%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1910 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2084 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2194 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2179 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1370 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

834 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

536 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

545 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

460 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) Brightness measurement

Result

668 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW)

Philips OLED950

Luminance of RGB colors

The OLED950 is a phenomenal television for consuming content in HDR format, primarily thanks to the innovative Tandem OLED panel. With this technology, the screen can generate astronomical brightness levels, reaching over 2000 nits in film scenes (on test patterns). This is an exceptional result that places the OLED950 among the world’s top displays available on the market. However, it is important to note a specific characteristic of this solution – at moments when full-screen bursts of light appear on the screen, brightness can drop by as much as half. It is worth emphasising, though, that values above 1000 nits on a full screen are still an outstanding result. This allows for the HDR image to be displayed exactly as filmmakers would wish, maintaining the dynamics and impact of bright scenes.

The use of the Tandem OLED panel has also brought tangible benefits in terms of colour reproduction, improving elements that traditional WOLED panels struggled with compared to their QD-OLED competition. For the OLED950, the colour gamut coverage is broader than in classic WOLED panels, reaching nearly 100% of the DCI-P3 colour space and a solid 82% of the demanding BT.2020 palette. Although these results still do not match the high standards of QD-OLED panels, the difference diminishes during real-world use. We cannot deny that in the vast majority of films, colours look simply fantastic on this model – they are saturated, vibrant, and full of depth.

One thing you cannot deny The Frame Pro is: brightness. At peak we measured around 850–900 nits, so the TV already has enough power to show many HDR scenes really impressively. Bright, full‑screen shots and more colourful frames perform best here. In such scenes The Frame Pro can make a good impression because the image is bright, punchy and has the effect we expect from HDR. In our measurements some scenes reached over 800 nits, and even in more challenging segments the TV maintained a quite respectable brightness level.

The problem starts when HDR depends on small bright elements shown on a dark background. Individual lamps, stars or highlights can be bright, but very often the black level across a larger part of the image also rises. As a result the bright point itself may look good, but the whole frame loses a lot of quality. Therefore The Frame Pro shows HDR best in scenes that are simply full‑screen. If a film or TV series has plenty of such shots, the effect can be really pleasant. In darker material the limitations of local dimming are much more noticeable.

Colours

The Frame Pro should be praised for its colour gamut coverage. The TV uses quantum dots, the solution known as QLED, which allows it to reproduce very well saturated colours. In our measurements coverage of the most important film gamut DCI‑P3 was around 94.5%, while the more demanding BT.2020 was about 72%.

These are very solid results that in most scenes allow for pleasant, saturated colours. Of course these figures are not as spectacular as in the latest screens using RGB backlighting, but The Frame Pro makes up for that with something else: colour stability. Regardless of the scene, colour saturation remains fairly consistent and there are no situations where the TV loses colour badly in more demanding shots.

Factory color reproduction

5.5/10

5.5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the OLED950 model in Film mode. Although it is theoretically the best and most faithful preset on this television, in practice it proved not to be free from flaws. Interestingly, in the unit we tested, the biggest challenge was not the white balance itself – although it did show a slight tendency to give the image a pinkish hue. The main issue lay in the way the television managed brightness, both in everyday SDR content and in demanding HDR scenes. The analysis of the gamma graph and the EOTF curve leads to one key conclusion: the television excessively exposes brightness in the lower registers. This results in the image appearing less contrasty than the panel technology allows. Details in dark areas that should remain perfectly black (characteristic of "OLED black") are simply unnecessarily highlighted and brightened. Fortunately, these errors can be corrected using the appropriate tools, which is why – as always – we proceeded with professional calibration.

In SDR material The Frame Pro in Filmmaker mode performs quite well, though it falls a little short of perfect. The white balance is relatively even, but as brightness increases the blue component drops, so the brighter parts of the image can have a slightly warmer tint. A bigger difference is visible in the gamma, that is the handling of the screen's brightness. For most of the range it runs below our reference point, which means the TV slightly brightens midtones. As a result the image can appear a little brighter and less contrasty than it should. The colour errors themselves are not huge, but they are noticeable enough that calibration could still bring considerable improvement.

In HDR content the white balance looks similar — for a large part of the range it is fairly even, with larger deviations appearing only at higher brightness. The EOTF curve is more interesting. The Frame Pro sticks reasonably close to the reference values in the brighter part of the image, but clearly brightens the darkest sections. This is mainly due to the design of the TV's backlight. That also affects colours. With less saturated hues the errors remain moderate, but as saturation increases they become much larger. In Colour Checker measurements a large portion of samples already show high error values. The factory HDR can therefore be regarded as decent, but it is certainly not an image we would call very faithful.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.4/10

8.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

As can be seen, the OLED950, after a professional calibration process, transforms into an absolutely phenomenal display that, without a shadow of a doubt, can be placed alongside the best televisions currently available in the world. This equipment only needed a professional touch to show its full potential and eliminate factory shortcomings. The minimal errors in reproduction in the Color Checker tests and the fidelity of the colour palette speak for themselves. We are dealing with an almost perfect device here. A true window to the world, offering image quality of the highest order.

After calibration the biggest improvement is visible above all in SDR content. We managed to even out the white balance, but the more important change was the gamma correction, which before calibration had the greatest influence on the image character. After the adjustments the gamma curve is now very close to the reference, so the picture is not as bright in the midtones and simply looks more natural. Colour errors have also been significantly reduced, so the effect of calibration in SDR is clearly visible.

With HDR the situation is somewhat more complex. White balance has been improved and over part of the range the TV stays much closer to the reference, but deviations still appear at higher brightness levels. The same applies to colour reproduction: some errors can be corrected, but not all stem from the settings alone. This highlights the limitations of the TV's design and the way its backlight and local dimming affect HDR images. Therefore, with The Frame Pro calibration makes the biggest difference to everyday viewing. Regular TV, YouTube and films and series in SDR (mainly those from the cheaper tiers of streaming services) can look noticeably better afterwards.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.1/10

9.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

If we were to point out the weaker aspect of the OLED950 model in comparison to market competitors like the G5 and S95F, it would be the digital signal processing – just like with most televisions from this manufacturer. Although the processor used here is termed “dual,” our practical tests did not reveal significant changes compared to the lower-positioned OLED910 model. The differences are, in fact, symbolic, which was reflected in only a cosmetic increase in the rating in this category. In very demanding, particularly dark scenes, one can still occasionally notice issues with slight posterisation. However, it must be clearly stated that this is a “flaw” that the average viewer will very rarely notice during normal usage, and the overall perception remains at a high level.

In terms of the smoothness of tonal transitions, The Frame Pro performs really well. In most content there is no obvious banding or unpleasant transitions between similar shades, and gradients look smooth and natural. Even in more demanding scenes with fog or dark transitions, issues are very rare. This is definitely one of the model's stronger points.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.1/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Upscaling

In terms of the image upscaling, the proprietary P5 processor performs just as well as in most models from this manufacturer. Low-resolution content takes on a very soft and plastic character. This kind of presentation will certainly appeal to many people. However, if you prefer sharper contours, you can lightly enhance them with the appropriate slider in the television's menu. It's really hard to find fault in this aspect. The image simply looks very good and additionally there is no issue with the phenomenon of overscan.

Smoothing and Distortion Reduction

The function for smoothing tonal transitions performs somewhat worse. In the settings, we find an option called "Distortion Reduction." This allows for three levels of adjustment of the processor's interference. Unfortunately, the Minimum setting works poorly and the smoothing effects are negligible. The Medium level gives a decent result, but it also starts to smooth out actors' skin details. On the other hand, the Maximum setting works too aggressively. It definitely removes too much detail from the faces and background elements, and can even take away the film grain. To achieve the optimal effect, it's worth experimenting with these settings at home and adjusting them to your preference. It may seem that the Medium option is the best compromise here.

The Frame Pro uses the NQ4 AI Gen3 processor, so in terms of image processing it behaves very similarly to other newer Samsung TVs. Upscaling works really well – lower-resolution content is appropriately sharpened and the picture remains clear without excessive edge enhancement. With regular broadcast TV or lower-quality YouTube material this can provide a noticeable improvement, although viewers watching even older material, e.g. from VHS tapes, may notice a slight cropping of the image on the left side (overscan).

It's a bit different when improving more highly compressed footage by reducing noise and artefacts such as posterization. The "Noise reduction" function can improve poor material, but fairly quickly it begins to alter the picture and remove fine details and grain. Therefore it's best to use it sparingly and mainly when the source truly requires it.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

7.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
70%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (1080p@240Hz):

The motion reproduction in the OLED950 model is virtually perfect. This is typical for screens of this type (OLED 120Hz+), as the panel shows no blurring at all. This allows us to enjoy perfect sharpness in practically any conditions. Much of this is thanks not only to the specifics of organic technology. Equally important work is done by the smoothing systems implemented by the manufacturer.

The Frame Pro comes with a 144 Hz panel, and when connected to a PC it also supports 240 Hz at Full HD resolution. That feature is primarily aimed at PC gamers, but the TV also performs very well at the standard 120 Hz refresh rate used for watching sport or gaming on consoles. A key advantage is the low level of motion blur. For a VA panel, The Frame Pro does very well in this respect. You don't see the strong, dark trailing smears behind moving objects that we often encounter on TVs with this type of panel. As a result, fast-paced sport and dynamic games remain clear in motion. Of course there's also motion smoothing with adjustable smoothness, so for films and sports broadcasts we can tailor the motion character to our preferences. You'll find our recommended settings in the photo.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

9.6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 240Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The OLED950 is nearly the perfect television for gamers. This is not only due to the unique atmosphere created by the Ambilight system during gameplay. The most important aspect here is the robust hardware support. You will find literally everything you should expect from a modern gaming display. The manufacturer has implemented two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s. This gives us access to gaming in 4K resolution at 120 frames per second. Of course, support for VRR technology and the automatic ALLM game mode is also included. The device handles any HDR signal without difficulty, whether we are using Dolby Vision or the HGiG standard.

Access to all settings is available from one place thanks to the special Game Bar overlay. Although this interface may not be the most visually appealing on the market, it fully accomplishes its purpose. It displays all the important signal parameters and offers useful extras. Gamers can take advantage of the minimap zoom feature or add a permanent crosshair on the screen, which can be seen as a small aid in online competition. The contrast range adjustment also proves to be useful, as it allows you to brighten shadows and gain better visibility of enemies hidden in dark corners of the map.

Functionally for gamers The Frame Pro has a great deal to offer. The TV supports 4K at 120 Hz, VRR, ALLM and a properly implemented HGiG. When connected to a PC you can also use 144 Hz at 4K, and even 240 Hz when dropping to Full HD. Samsung also includes its standard suite of gaming extras. There is an expanded Game Bar that lets you quickly view and change the most important settings, and Game Motion Plus, which can improve the smoothness of games running at 30 or 60 frames per second. On top of that there is the Gaming Hub and the option to play in the cloud without needing to connect a console. The only real omission is Dolby Vision Gaming, which Samsung does not support. Apart from that, The Frame Pro offers virtually everything you can expect from a well-equipped gaming TV today.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
13 ms
1080p120
5 ms
7 ms
2160p60
12 ms
13 ms
2160p120
5 ms
7 ms

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
13 ms
2160p120
5 ms
7 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
12 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

As we have come to expect from televisions in this segment, the signal delay in this model is practically negligible. Our measurements indicated almost reference values: just 5 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12 ms for a 60 Hz signal. This means an instantaneous response to every command issued via the controller, mouse, or keyboard. With such low results, the only limitation during dynamic online gameplay is now just your own reflexes and lack of "skill," not the hardware. 😉

On The Frame Pro, input lag depends mainly on where you plug in your console or PC. We measured it with a direct connection to the Micro HDMI 2.1 port on the back of the TV, because that is the setup we'd recommend for gaming. In that case the results are very good, about 13 ms at 60 Hz and 7 ms at 120 Hz.

A much worse picture appears when the console is connected to the wireless One Connect module. In our case the module sat about 2.5 metres from the TV, next to the sofa and with no major obstructions in between. Despite that, the delay increased to roughly 60–70 ms at 60 Hz and 30–40 ms at 120 Hz. And you can really feel that difference. So if you want to play on The Frame Pro, it's best to plug the console directly into the TV.

Input lag Wireless One Connect (approx. 2.5 m from the TV)

SDR

HDR

1080p 60 Hz: 61

2160p 60 Hz HDR: 71

1080p 120 Hz: 39

2160p 120 Hz HDR: 32

2160p 60 Hz: 63

2160p 120 Hz: 32

Compatibility with PC

6.5/10

8.4/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Average
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BWRG
RGB
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

In this category, the situation looks quite specific. If we look at the OLED950 through the lens of a gamer, we get a phenomenal display. It performs excellently not only with consoles but also in combination with a powerful computer. Here we have access to an additional 144 Hz mode, full support for G-Sync and FreeSync technologies, as well as very low input lag. One could therefore risk stating that for PC gamers, this is an almost ideal monitor.

However, problems arise when we look at the readability of the fonts. We are not just referring to the unusual subpixel arrangement of WOLED panels (BWRG), which causes a specific colouration of the text edges in all TVs of this type. The tested model has trouble properly displaying Chroma 4:4:4 sampling. This is mainly visible when we display colourful text on another colourful background. The letters then gain strange shading, unnatural contours, and unwanted artefacts. It's a bit of a shame, although we must honestly admit that this is a very specific flaw. For 99% of you, no one is likely to notice this during normal entertainment. However, if you belong to that 1% of people planning to purchase the OLED950 strictly as an office monitor, you may feel disappointed.

The Frame Pro performs well when connected to a PC. It supports full 4:4:4, 144 Hz at 4K and 240 Hz at Full HD. It also works with both NVIDIA's G-Sync and AMD's FreeSync. However, it's not ideal for working with text. From a normal viewing distance everything looks fine, but up close you can see minor artefacts around fonts and slightly less clean edges. This doesn't matter much for gaming or watching content, but it can be noticeable when doing office work.

Viewing angles

7.6/10

3.4/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
29%
72%

As is fitting for organic technology, the viewing angles here are practically very good. We can enjoy a great picture regardless of where on the sofa we are looking at the screen. The only reservation arises when directly comparing the Tandem OLED matrix used here with the competition's solutions. In comparison with last year's LG panels equipped with MLA filters or the best QD-OLED screens from Samsung, the angles in the OLED950 are slightly weaker. They are not as perfect as those of the mentioned rivals. Nevertheless, they generally still maintain a very high level, and in everyday use, it is hard to consider this a disadvantage.

The Frame Pro’s viewing angles are mediocre at best, if not poor. The TV uses a conventional VA panel, and at wider angles the image loses quality fairly quickly. Brightness falls first and foremost, but colour saturation also noticeably fades, making the picture look more washed out. That’s a bit more of a shame with The Frame Pro than with a regular television. It’s a model that is often intended to hang on a wall and also serve as a piece of art, so better viewing angles would be genuinely welcome here.

Daytime performance

7.3/10

6.5/10

Panel finish
Glare
Matte
Reflection suppression
Decent
Very Good
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Average

Panel brightness

Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW): 587 cd/m2

Philips OLED950: 615 cd/m2

The OLED950 model will perform well in very bright rooms without any concerns. A key advantage here is the previously mentioned very high brightness of the panel. The performance is impressive for OLED technology. It can confidently be stated that in this respect, this television is capable of competing with mid-range Mini-LED models. In the world of organic panels, this is not at all obvious, which is a significant advantage of the tested device.

However, there is a certain drawback that can be described as a Achilles' heel. Similar to most Tandem OLED panels, the manufacturer has applied a glossy screen coating here. Unfortunately, it does not handle direct light reflections very well. It is worth bearing this in mind when planning the position of the television in relation to windows, as reflections may be noticeable.

During the day The Frame Pro performs quite well. SDR brightness stays around 600 nits, so even in a more brightly lit room the picture remains clear. The biggest advantage, however, is the matte screen coating, which diffuses reflections very effectively and means lamps or windows are far less visible on the screen. We did notice, though, that on this year’s model the coating affects the image a little more. With more light blacks appear slightly lifted and colours lose some of their depth. It’s still a very good option for a bright living room, but in that respect the screen is not entirely without compromises.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Software version during testing
1204
Image processor
MT5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips OLED950 TV Panel details
Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV Panel details

TV features

6.5/10

7.7/10

  • System
    Google TV
    Tizen
  • System performance
    Good
    Good
  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    USB-C, Micro-HDMI
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro 2026 (LS03HW) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi
    Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Smart Features

The biggest plus of the OLED950 is the Google TV system — the manufacturer is increasingly moving away from it in cheaper models in favour of TitanOS, but here we are fortunately still provided with a full Android-based environment. This means access to a vast library of applications, a voice assistant, and convenient features like Chromecast. For unknown reasons, we have once again been unable to launch Windows Miracast in the editorial office, despite the manufacturer's claim that this option is available. On the positive side: Apple device users can rest easy, as the television supports AirPlay.

Classic Features

In terms of "classics", the television offers a rather basic set: teletext and Bluetooth connectivity. The most objections arise regarding the remote control. On one hand, it is sensibly designed with backlighting, "hybrid" switching between typical functions and a numeric keypad, and charging via USB-C. On the other hand, enthusiasm quickly wanes when it turns out that you need to aim it at the screen, as it operates on infrared.

Tizen and Smart TV features

The Smart TV features are, of course, handled by Tizen. The system runs smoothly and offers a very large selection of streaming apps. It also supports AirPlay, Miracast and voice search in Polish. In this respect The Frame Pro is not particularly different from other new Samsung models. We simply get the manufacturer's extensive, well-functioning system.

Art Mode and Art Store

The Art Mode is naturally much more interesting, as it is one of the most important features of the entire The Frame series. When switched off the TV can display artworks, photographs or graphics instead of a black screen, and can quite convincingly mimic a traditional framed picture on the wall. Samsung provides access to the Art Store, where the selection of works is really large and the materials themselves are prepared to a very high quality. The problem is that full access requires a subscription, and in our view that is a significant downside for a TV whose main selling point is this very feature. Fortunately we are not tied to the Art Store. You can upload your own photos or graphics, so nothing prevents you from finding a high-resolution artwork yourself and displaying it on the screen. The automation of this mode is also very well designed. The Frame Pro not only has an ambient light sensor, which can adapt the appearance of the displayed image to the room, but also a presence sensor. The TV can therefore detect when someone is in the room and automatically start Art Mode.

Classic features

As for classic TV features, The Frame Pro offers a fairly basic set of conveniences. It has DVB-T/T2, DVB-S/S2 and DVB-C tuners, teletext, an audio-only mode and the ability to use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speakers at the same time. However, it lacks the ability to record programmes to USB, PiP and a more advanced remote, for example one with a numeric keypad. The remote operates via radio, so you do not have to point it at the screen.

Apps

9.6/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.5/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The factory file player in the OLED950 model works simply brilliantly. During our tests, the device handled virtually every format we provided. Whether they were video files, audio tracks or photos, the television played them without issue. It is difficult to find weak points in the handling of the most popular standards. However, if someone still feels something is lacking (which seems unlikely), the operating system comes to the rescue. With the presence of Google TV, we are not solely dependent on default solutions. At any time, we can enter the app store and install an external player, such as the popular VLC or Kodi. This gives us the assurance that the television can handle literally any file from our home library.

The Frame Pro handles playback of files from USB storage well. Most common video, audio and photo formats work correctly, so you’re unlikely to need to connect a laptop just to play a film or browse photos. What we miss most is support for HEIC, the format commonly used for photos taken on iPhones. So Apple users will therefore have to convert such photos beforehand to a supported format or simply stream them to the TV via AirPlay. Other than that, the player works very well.

Sound

8.2/10

6.4/10

  • Maximum volume
    85dB
    89dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The 2.1 speaker setup used here, with a total power of 70 W, provides a really solid dose of proper sound. It plays clearly, and thanks to the additional subwoofer at the back of the enclosure, the sound is deep and has a definite impact. This element is often missing in cheaper designs, where bass is virtually non-existent. However, we must face the truth when comparing it to the OLED910 model. That television, equipped with a built-in Bowers & Wilkins soundbar, simply sounds much better. Was it a good decision? In our opinion, the outstanding audio from the 910 model adds greater value. Choosing the 950 model makes sense mainly if you are big fans of Ambilight, and you deal with sound through an external home cinema or soundbar anyway.

The Frame Pro's sound is adequate and has changed little from last year's model. The TV handles dialogue particularly well, with voices clear and easy to hear. However, it lacks stronger bass, so films and music don't have much depth. Therefore, if better sound matters, it's worth considering a soundbar when buying The Frame Pro. Models from the S series are particularly well suited, as their slim design complements the TV's appearance. Finally, it's worth noting that The Frame Pro supports Dolby Atmos, so with a compatible soundbar or AV receiver you can enjoy surround sound. It does not support DTS, which is worth bearing in mind when playing films from your own library, for example Blu-ray discs.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

89dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy