Philips OLED950 is undoubtedly a technological showcase that redefines in many ways what we can expect from a home entertainment centre. The use of the groundbreaking Tandem OLED panel means we are at an absolute peak in terms of picture quality. The combination of infinite black and perfect contrast with brightness that can exceed the magical barrier of 2000 nits in HDR mode creates effects that are, at times, breathtaking. Whether we are watching films in a sunlit living room or gaming at night with the support of a 4-sided Ambilight system, the experience is simply phenomenal. This is a complete screen that will satisfy both the cinephile seeking fidelity in Dolby Vision and the gamer demanding 144 Hz and perfect motion response.
However, this admiration for the raw performance of the panel mingles with a certain feeling of inadequacy when we look at the manufacturer's promises regarding image processing. Philips heavily promoted the use of the "dual" P5 processor, suggesting that it would be a remedy for all the woes of digital signal processing. However, reality proved to be less revolutionary. In our tests, the difference compared to models equipped with the standard, single P5 chip was almost imperceptible in everyday use. Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions or posterisation in difficult scenes, although rare, still occur. Given the astronomical price of this model, we were hoping for a significantly greater quality leap in this aspect that would justify such a high positioning of the equipment. The issue of cost-effectiveness thus becomes the biggest problem of this otherwise outstanding television. When we look at the market with a cool eye, the situation of the 950 model becomes complicated. It’s not even about the strong competition from cheaper flagship models like LG G5 or Samsung S95F, but about the "fratricidal" battle within Philips' own offerings. It turns out that the lower-positioned OLED910 model offers us practically the same brilliant picture generated by an identical panel. Moreover, the 910 model wins in the audio department, offering an integrated soundbar from Bowers & Wilkins, which is simply absent in the pricier 950 model in favour of a different design. We thus face a paradox: we get the same picture and worse sound, yet we must pay significantly more. Therefore, although the OLED950 is a fantastic screen, in 2025 the title of "Best Philips Television" and our recommendation goes to the model OLED910.
The Frame Pro 2026 makes sense primarily when the TV is meant to look good in the living room and not be another large black slab on the wall. And here Samsung still does something that most manufacturers cannot reproduce as well. Flush mounting, interchangeable bezels, Art Mode, a matte finish and the wireless One Connect make it so that, when properly hung, The Frame Pro can actually look more like a piece of décor than AV equipment. In our view, it is the best-executed TV of this kind on the market. Importantly, you do not simply pay for the looks at the expense of everyday use. The Frame Pro is bright, the matte finish deals very well with reflections, so it performs really well in a well-lit living room. Colours are vivid, motion handling is very good, and there are surprisingly many gaming features for a TV that is, first and foremost, supposed to "look better".
More questions arise when you consider the "Pro" suffix and its classification as a Neo QLED screen. You might expect a big jump in picture quality compared with the regular The Frame, but in practice it is not that large. The TV uses Mini-LED backlighting and local dimming, but the dimming zones are located at the edges of the screen. That is a completely different approach from more advanced Mini-LED models, where the backlight works across the whole surface of the panel. In bright, colourful scenes this is not a major problem. It gets worse in the evening, especially in films with many dark shots. Then you can see that black levels and backlight control are noticeably weaker than in the best Mini-LED TVs. This is where it becomes most apparent that "Pro" does not, in this case, mean top-tier picture quality.
An interesting alternative is the Samsung S99H. It has a very design-led character, but in terms of picture it already goes much further. Of course it also costs significantly more, so it is not a direct replacement but rather an option for someone who wants to combine both worlds without major compromises. So is it worth buying The Frame Pro 2026? In our view yes, but only if you know what you are paying for. The greatest strengths of this TV are its looks, Art Mode, very good performance in a bright living room and the wireless One Connect. If that is what you are after, The Frame Pro is a very interesting proposition. However, if the main argument for paying extra is markedly better picture quality, we are less convinced. It is simply a better, more refined The Frame, not a full-fledged rival to the best Mini-LEDs.