Philips OLED950 vs Samsung S85H

Direct comparison

OLED950 / OLED+

S85H

Available screen sizes: 65”77”

Available screen sizes: 48”55”65”77”83”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.4

7.9

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    8.8

    8.0

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.8

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.5

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    9.5

    9.6

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.5

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    7.3

    5.1

  • Utility functions

    6.5

    7.3

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    8.2

    7.2

Advantages

  • Amazing peak brightness, exceeding 2000 nits on test screens (Tandem OLED panel)

  • Perfect black and infinite contrast

  • Support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Excellent gaming features: support for 4K@120Hz, VRR, ALLM, and 144 Hz mode

  • Very low input lag

  • Impressive 4-sided Ambilight system

  • Google TV system offering access to a vast library of apps

  • Backlit remote, charged via USB-C connector

  • Perfect black and infinite contrast: OLED

  • Decent HDR brightness of up to around 800 nits

  • High image fidelity after calibration

  • Very smooth motion, 120 Hz OLED panel

  • Rich set of gaming features: VRR, Game Bar, low input lag

  • Four HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48 Gbps bandwidth

  • Extensive, smooth-running Tizen system

  • Feature-rich solar-powered remote

  • Support for Dolby Atmos immersive sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • Only two HDMI ports in standard 2.1

  • Remote control communicating via infrared (requires aiming at the receiver)

  • Very high price compared to market competition

  • Sound quality noticeably weaker than in the lower model OLED910

  • Slight issues with posterisation

  • Worse reflection suppression than its predecessor, a characteristic of the new OLED SE panel

  • Average SDR brightness; best suited to rooms with controlled lighting

  • No DTS:X support, a drawback mainly for owners of Blu-ray collections

  • No Dolby Vision; not essential, but would be welcome 🙂

Our verdict

Philips OLED950 is undoubtedly a technological showcase that redefines in many ways what we can expect from a home entertainment centre. The use of the groundbreaking Tandem OLED panel means we are at an absolute peak in terms of picture quality. The combination of infinite black and perfect contrast with brightness that can exceed the magical barrier of 2000 nits in HDR mode creates effects that are, at times, breathtaking. Whether we are watching films in a sunlit living room or gaming at night with the support of a 4-sided Ambilight system, the experience is simply phenomenal. This is a complete screen that will satisfy both the cinephile seeking fidelity in Dolby Vision and the gamer demanding 144 Hz and perfect motion response.

However, this admiration for the raw performance of the panel mingles with a certain feeling of inadequacy when we look at the manufacturer's promises regarding image processing. Philips heavily promoted the use of the "dual" P5 processor, suggesting that it would be a remedy for all the woes of digital signal processing. However, reality proved to be less revolutionary. In our tests, the difference compared to models equipped with the standard, single P5 chip was almost imperceptible in everyday use. Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions or posterisation in difficult scenes, although rare, still occur. Given the astronomical price of this model, we were hoping for a significantly greater quality leap in this aspect that would justify such a high positioning of the equipment. The issue of cost-effectiveness thus becomes the biggest problem of this otherwise outstanding television. When we look at the market with a cool eye, the situation of the 950 model becomes complicated. It’s not even about the strong competition from cheaper flagship models like LG G5 or Samsung S95F, but about the "fratricidal" battle within Philips' own offerings. It turns out that the lower-positioned OLED910 model offers us practically the same brilliant picture generated by an identical panel. Moreover, the 910 model wins in the audio department, offering an integrated soundbar from Bowers & Wilkins, which is simply absent in the pricier 950 model in favour of a different design. We thus face a paradox: we get the same picture and worse sound, yet we must pay significantly more. Therefore, although the OLED950 is a fantastic screen, in 2025 the title of "Best Philips Television" and our recommendation goes to the model OLED910.

Samsung S85H is a very successful continuation of the S85 series and a television that still fulfils its primary role well – to be an affordable entry into the world of OLEDs. The biggest change compared with the predecessor is the use of the new OLED SE panel from LG Display, but the overall character of the model has remained practically unchanged. Its greatest strengths remain perfect blacks, very high contrast and a picture that can look particularly superb in the evening. Add to that good colour reproduction and the ability to achieve very high fidelity to the director’s vision. The S85H also performs very well as a versatile all-round TV. Gamers get four HDMI 2.1 ports, 120 Hz, VRR, very low input lag and Game Motion Plus, so there is little to criticise here. Tizen runs quickly and smoothly, and the whole system clearly targets users who mainly use Netflix, YouTube and other streaming services today, while treating traditional broadcast TV as an add-on. The new OLED SE panel is not without drawbacks. This is most noticeable when watching during the day, as it is worse at suppressing reflections than earlier organic panels. Its brightness is also not high enough for the S85H to feel particularly at home in a very brightly sunlit living room. It is still a TV that shows its strengths best in the evening or in a room with at least partial control of ambient light. And that is probably the best way to approach the S85H. It is not an OLED designed to break brightness records or compete with the most expensive panels. Its aim is simply to offer what people like most about the technology, but at a lower price. Perfect blacks, a very good picture for films, excellent gaming capabilities and a user-friendly smart system make the S85H one of the easiest ways to get into OLED without spending a fortune.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

10/10

Contrast:

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

There is not much to elaborate on here. As with every OLED television, the black and contrast quality in the Philips OLED950 is simply perfect. Regardless of the film scene being watched, night shots, or materials in a 2.39:1 aspect ratio with black bars, you can count on perfect black without any halos or brightening. This is one of the greatest advantages of OLED technology over LCD and Mini-LED televisions. There is no game of local dimming algorithms or compromises here. Black always remains black. The only thing we noticed in our tests is the helicopter scene from the film Sicario 2. The OLED950 quite clearly highlights details in the shadows. However, this is a feature of our test sample, more related to the character of image reproduction than to the black quality itself. In this regard, everything here is at the highest level.

Changing the panel to the new WOLED SE from LG Display practically changed nothing in terms of black levels and contrast. And it was hard to expect any major improvement here, since we're still talking about OLED, a technology that can switch off each pixel individually. In practice, that means perfect blacks and tremendous image depth, particularly in darker scenes. Black bars are truly black, there is no halo around bright elements, and contrast remains virtually infinite. Even very expensive Mini-LEDs with thousands of local dimming zones still cannot offer the same precision as the S85H. And that's its biggest advantage. The S85H may be Samsung's cheapest OLED, but when it comes to blacks it delivers exactly the same as far more expensive models that use organic panels.

HDR effect quality

8.7/10

6.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 99.7%, Bt.2020: 82.4%
DCI P3: 95.2%, Bt.2020: 70.9%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1910 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2084 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2194 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2179 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1370 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

733 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

744 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

837 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

755 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

404 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung S85H

Philips OLED950

Luminance of RGB colors

Luminance of RGB colors

The OLED950 is a phenomenal television for consuming content in HDR format, primarily thanks to the innovative Tandem OLED panel. With this technology, the screen can generate astronomical brightness levels, reaching over 2000 nits in film scenes (on test patterns). This is an exceptional result that places the OLED950 among the world’s top displays available on the market. However, it is important to note a specific characteristic of this solution – at moments when full-screen bursts of light appear on the screen, brightness can drop by as much as half. It is worth emphasising, though, that values above 1000 nits on a full screen are still an outstanding result. This allows for the HDR image to be displayed exactly as filmmakers would wish, maintaining the dynamics and impact of bright scenes.

The use of the Tandem OLED panel has also brought tangible benefits in terms of colour reproduction, improving elements that traditional WOLED panels struggled with compared to their QD-OLED competition. For the OLED950, the colour gamut coverage is broader than in classic WOLED panels, reaching nearly 100% of the DCI-P3 colour space and a solid 82% of the demanding BT.2020 palette. Although these results still do not match the high standards of QD-OLED panels, the difference diminishes during real-world use. We cannot deny that in the vast majority of films, colours look simply fantastic on this model – they are saturated, vibrant, and full of depth.

Interestingly, the new WOLED SE panel has brought a slight improvement in brightness to the S85 series. In the same movie scenes last year's model stayed closer to around 700 nits, while the S85H can reach roughly 800 nits. This isn't a change that completely transforms HDR perception, but that extra brightness is noticeable, especially with pinpoint highlights, specular reflections and stronger special effects. Around 800 nits is already a very good result for an entry-level OLED and in most films it's enough for HDR to have the proper impact. Bright elements can stand out clearly against perfect black, and it's still that contrast that does most of the work. You do need to bear in mind a typical limitation of organic panel technology. When a very bright scene covers a large part of the screen, brightness can drop by almost half. That's the effect of the panel's protection mechanisms, which limit its power with large bright areas.

Colours

The S85H can deliver very pleasing, saturated colours and in most HDR films it looks really good in that respect. We measured around 95% DCI-P3 coverage, so the palette most commonly used in movies is reproduced to a very high degree. Skin tones, greens and stronger reds still have the right intensity, and in normal viewing it's hard to fault them. Only when you look wider at BT.2020 do the limitations of the new OLED SE panel become apparent. Coverage was about 70%, a little less than previous-generation WOLEDs and noticeably less than QD-OLED panels. In films this is not a big loss, because most productions rarely use such highly saturated colours. You're more likely to notice it in games, where creators often opt for more intense colours.

Factory color reproduction

5.5/10

7/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the OLED950 model in Film mode. Although it is theoretically the best and most faithful preset on this television, in practice it proved not to be free from flaws. Interestingly, in the unit we tested, the biggest challenge was not the white balance itself – although it did show a slight tendency to give the image a pinkish hue. The main issue lay in the way the television managed brightness, both in everyday SDR content and in demanding HDR scenes. The analysis of the gamma graph and the EOTF curve leads to one key conclusion: the television excessively exposes brightness in the lower registers. This results in the image appearing less contrasty than the panel technology allows. Details in dark areas that should remain perfectly black (characteristic of "OLED black") are simply unnecessarily highlighted and brightened. Fortunately, these errors can be corrected using the appropriate tools, which is why – as always – we proceeded with professional calibration.

For colour evaluation we naturally chose Filmmaker mode, and in SDR our S85H sample was very well set up from the factory. The largest deviation is in the white balance, where, as brightness rises, there is a slight lack of blue. In practice this means whites and greys have a subtly warmer tint than they should. However, this is not a major fault and during normal viewing it is unlikely to be very noticeable. Gamma also stays close to the reference value, so the image is neither overly bright nor unnecessarily dim. The S85H’s SDR picture quality is therefore very good straight out of the box. A few more imperfections appear in HDR. Here the white balance drifts more with increasing brightness, blue starts to dominate and the red component is clearly lacking. This also translates into larger errors for some colours. They do not yet amount to shifts that completely change the character of the image, but in direct comparison with a reference the difference is easier to spot. Overall, Filmmaker mode is a very good starting point before professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.4/10

9.1/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

As can be seen, the OLED950, after a professional calibration process, transforms into an absolutely phenomenal display that, without a shadow of a doubt, can be placed alongside the best televisions currently available in the world. This equipment only needed a professional touch to show its full potential and eliminate factory shortcomings. The minimal errors in reproduction in the Color Checker tests and the fidelity of the colour palette speak for themselves. We are dealing with an almost perfect device here. A true window to the world, offering image quality of the highest order.

Calibration yields very good results on the S85H. First and foremost, it was possible to set the white balance almost perfectly, which removes the slightly too warm character of the image that was previously visible in SDR. Colour reproduction itself also improves markedly, with most errors falling to a very low level and in everyday viewing it is hard to speak of any noticeable inaccuracies. You can also make significant improvements in HDR, although some issues remain due to the TV's inherent characteristics. The S85H does not always hold the brightness curve perfectly; the darkest parts are slightly lifted, and as you approach the panel's limits small deviations are visible in the brightest areas. Added to this is the limited coverage of the wider BT.2020 gamut, which of course cannot be overcome by any calibration. Despite this, the end result is very good and, after calibration, the S85H can produce a really well-tuned, natural image.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.1/10

7/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

If we were to point out the weaker aspect of the OLED950 model in comparison to market competitors like the G5 and S95F, it would be the digital signal processing – just like with most televisions from this manufacturer. Although the processor used here is termed “dual,” our practical tests did not reveal significant changes compared to the lower-positioned OLED910 model. The differences are, in fact, symbolic, which was reflected in only a cosmetic increase in the rating in this category. In very demanding, particularly dark scenes, one can still occasionally notice issues with slight posterisation. However, it must be clearly stated that this is a “flaw” that the average viewer will very rarely notice during normal usage, and the overall perception remains at a high level.

The smoothness of tonal transitions is definitely not a strong suit of the S85H compared with other OLEDs. It is most visible in bright gradients, where fairly obvious banding appears between successive shades. Instead of a perfectly smooth transition you can see distinct colour bands and, unfortunately, you do not have to hunt for them. Moving gradients fare even worse. When tonal transitions move the imperfections become more apparent and the picture looks simply average in this respect. It is not perfect on dark gradients either. You can also notice irregularities there, so the issue is not limited to the brightest areas of the image. Of course, in a typical film you will not see this all the time, but scenes with large areas of similar colour, such as sky, fog, sunset or a dark background, can reveal the panel's limitations. Compared with older WOLEDs there is still some improvement, but looking at the TVs we have tested this year the S85H is average in this regard, much like its rival the LG B6 that uses the same panel. And this is one of those traits where the difference compared with last year's QD-OLED panel becomes very clear. QD-OLEDs handle the smooth blending of successive shades much better and, in terms of gradation, clearly outperform the WOLED SE panel used here.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.1/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Upscaling

In terms of the image upscaling, the proprietary P5 processor performs just as well as in most models from this manufacturer. Low-resolution content takes on a very soft and plastic character. This kind of presentation will certainly appeal to many people. However, if you prefer sharper contours, you can lightly enhance them with the appropriate slider in the television's menu. It's really hard to find fault in this aspect. The image simply looks very good and additionally there is no issue with the phenomenon of overscan.

Smoothing and Distortion Reduction

The function for smoothing tonal transitions performs somewhat worse. In the settings, we find an option called "Distortion Reduction." This allows for three levels of adjustment of the processor's interference. Unfortunately, the Minimum setting works poorly and the smoothing effects are negligible. The Medium level gives a decent result, but it also starts to smooth out actors' skin details. On the other hand, the Maximum setting works too aggressively. It definitely removes too much detail from the faces and background elements, and can even take away the film grain. To achieve the optimal effect, it's worth experimenting with these settings at home and adjusting them to your preference. It may seem that the Medium option is the best compromise here.

Samsung has fitted the S85H with the same proprietary AI NQ4 Gen2 processor used in last year’s S85F and, in terms of digital image processing, it performs quite well. Upscaling is one of the model’s stronger points. Lower-resolution material is well sharpened, edges look natural, and the picture does not feel overly artificial. One caveat is a typical Samsung trait: at very low resolutions you cannot completely disable overscan, so the TV may slightly crop the left edge of the image. The "noise reduction" function also works very well, smoothing weaker tonal transitions. The processor can effectively remove posterisation and other imperfections visible in lower-quality material. However, you need to be careful with the strength of this function, because Samsung can be quite aggressive here. When it is activated, small image details, such as the texture of skin or clothing, can start to disappear along with the unwanted artefacts.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (4K@60Hz):

The motion reproduction in the OLED950 model is virtually perfect. This is typical for screens of this type (OLED 120Hz+), as the panel shows no blurring at all. This allows us to enjoy perfect sharpness in practically any conditions. Much of this is thanks not only to the specifics of organic technology. Equally important work is done by the smoothing systems implemented by the manufacturer.

The S85H uses an OLED panel, so it performs excellently for motion blur. Pixels respond virtually instantly, so moving objects do not leave the characteristic trailing seen on some LCD TVs. This is especially noticeable in sport and fast-paced games, where the picture remains very clean even during rapid motion. The panel itself runs at 120 Hz. That is more than sufficient for films, TV series, sport and console gaming. It is a pity Samsung did not include a higher refresh rate aimed at PC gamers, as more and more TVs now offer 144 or even 165 Hz at 4K. However, that does not affect motion handling in films or sport.

You also have a classic motion-smoothing feature with two settings, blur reduction and judder reduction. So you can decide whether films should retain their cinematic 24 frames per second or whether you prefer to smooth them a little. The S85H gives plenty of freedom here, and the interpolation works well and, with sensible settings, does not generate too many artefacts.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

9.6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The OLED950 is nearly the perfect television for gamers. This is not only due to the unique atmosphere created by the Ambilight system during gameplay. The most important aspect here is the robust hardware support. You will find literally everything you should expect from a modern gaming display. The manufacturer has implemented two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s. This gives us access to gaming in 4K resolution at 120 frames per second. Of course, support for VRR technology and the automatic ALLM game mode is also included. The device handles any HDR signal without difficulty, whether we are using Dolby Vision or the HGiG standard.

Access to all settings is available from one place thanks to the special Game Bar overlay. Although this interface may not be the most visually appealing on the market, it fully accomplishes its purpose. It displays all the important signal parameters and offers useful extras. Gamers can take advantage of the minimap zoom feature or add a permanent crosshair on the screen, which can be seen as a small aid in online competition. The contrast range adjustment also proves to be useful, as it allows you to brighten shadows and gain better visibility of enemies hidden in dark corners of the map.

The Samsung S85H is very well prepared for gaming, essentially regardless of whether you connect a console or a PC. The manufacturer hasn't skimped on ports and all four HDMI ports support full HDMI 2.1. That means you can use 4K at 120 Hz, VRR and ALLM without worrying which input your console is plugged into. With multiple devices that matters a lot, because you don't have to choose between a console, a PC or a soundbar connected via eARC. The feature set itself is very comprehensive. The S85H supports VRR, FreeSync and automatic game mode switching, and Samsung also offers its extensive Game Bar where you can quickly check key signal parameters and change settings without leaving the game. The only notable omission is Dolby Vision, which will matter mainly to Xbox owners. This, incidentally, is typical of Samsung TVs. Game Motion Plus performs very well, and it's one of the features that have set Samsung TVs apart for years. It smooths motion in games running at 30 or 60 fps, but does so without as much increase in input lag as a conventional motion interpolator. In practice, with slower-paced games, racing titles or action games this can really improve the perceived motion, especially if you're sensitive to low frame rates.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
10 ms
1080p120
5 ms
5 ms
2160p60
12 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
12 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

As we have come to expect from televisions in this segment, the signal delay in this model is practically negligible. Our measurements indicated almost reference values: just 5 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12 ms for a 60 Hz signal. This means an instantaneous response to every command issued via the controller, mouse, or keyboard. With such low results, the only limitation during dynamic online gameplay is now just your own reflexes and lack of "skill," not the hardware. 😉

The Samsung S85H also performs very well in terms of input lag. At 120 Hz we measured input lag below 5 ms, a level at which the TV's response to controls is practically instantaneous. At 60 Hz the delay is, of course, higher, but still very low, around 10 ms, so in this respect the S85H gives little cause for complaint.

Compatibility with PC

6.5/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Average
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
5ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BWRG
RGWB
Max refresh rate
144Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

In this category, the situation looks quite specific. If we look at the OLED950 through the lens of a gamer, we get a phenomenal display. It performs excellently not only with consoles but also in combination with a powerful computer. Here we have access to an additional 144 Hz mode, full support for G-Sync and FreeSync technologies, as well as very low input lag. One could therefore risk stating that for PC gamers, this is an almost ideal monitor.

However, problems arise when we look at the readability of the fonts. We are not just referring to the unusual subpixel arrangement of WOLED panels (BWRG), which causes a specific colouration of the text edges in all TVs of this type. The tested model has trouble properly displaying Chroma 4:4:4 sampling. This is mainly visible when we display colourful text on another colourful background. The letters then gain strange shading, unnatural contours, and unwanted artefacts. It's a bit of a shame, although we must honestly admit that this is a very specific flaw. For 99% of you, no one is likely to notice this during normal entertainment. However, if you belong to that 1% of people planning to purchase the OLED950 strictly as an office monitor, you may feel disappointed.

Samsung S85H will also work very well as a large computer monitor. Font legibility is good and, from the typical viewing distance for such a large screen, text looks really good. You just need to remember the four-subpixel layout of the WOLED panel, because from very close up the edges of letters are not quite as perfectly sharp as on a conventional RGB monitor. However, this is a characteristic of OLED technology itself and, in normal TV use, it should not be an issue.

The S85H also has plenty to offer PC gamers. You get 120 Hz, G-Sync support, very low input lag and, of course, the OLED panel's lightning-fast response time. The only thing missing for complete satisfaction is the ability to run the panel at a higher refresh rate. More and more TVs already support 144 or 165 Hz at 4K, so an extra mode like that would be welcome here.

Viewing angles

7.6/10

7.5/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
29%
34%

As is fitting for organic technology, the viewing angles here are practically very good. We can enjoy a great picture regardless of where on the sofa we are looking at the screen. The only reservation arises when directly comparing the Tandem OLED matrix used here with the competition's solutions. In comparison with last year's LG panels equipped with MLA filters or the best QD-OLED screens from Samsung, the angles in the OLED950 are slightly weaker. They are not as perfect as those of the mentioned rivals. Nevertheless, they generally still maintain a very high level, and in everyday use, it is hard to consider this a disadvantage.

Viewing angles are one of the major advantages of the S85H and OLED panels in general. Even when viewed well off to the side, the image still retains good contrast, brightness and colour saturation. In this respect the S85H performs decidedly better than practically any LCD or Mini-LED TV available today. Only QD-OLED panels actually do better, as they can keep colours even more consistent at wide viewing angles. However, those are found only in higher-end models.

Daytime performance

7.3/10

5.1/10

Panel finish
Glare
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Average
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

Samsung S85H: 350 cd/m2

Philips OLED950: 615 cd/m2

The OLED950 model will perform well in very bright rooms without any concerns. A key advantage here is the previously mentioned very high brightness of the panel. The performance is impressive for OLED technology. It can confidently be stated that in this respect, this television is capable of competing with mid-range Mini-LED models. In the world of organic panels, this is not at all obvious, which is a significant advantage of the tested device.

However, there is a certain drawback that can be described as a Achilles' heel. Similar to most Tandem OLED panels, the manufacturer has applied a glossy screen coating here. Unfortunately, it does not handle direct light reflections very well. It is worth bearing this in mind when planning the position of the television in relation to windows, as reflections may be noticeable.

The Samsung S85H is a moderately bright TV. In our measurements the average SDR brightness was around 350 nits, so that should be sufficient for ordinary daytime viewing, provided the TV is not in a very sunlit living room. In a moderately lit room the picture remains readable, but with large windows and light shining directly on the screen the S85H's capabilities start to fall short. We have a few more criticisms of the WOLED SE panel itself. A change in the panel's construction compared with the previous generation has affected how the screen handles reflections, and unfortunately it is not a change for the better. Reflections are more noticeable than on earlier WOLED panels. LG Display tried to partly mask this effect with a more satin screen finish that scatters light, but that does not completely solve the issue. With a strong light source the reflection becomes quite large and a characteristic greyish halo appears around it. Photos clearly show that such a reflection can occupy a large part of the image and greatly affect how it is perceived. So the S85H does not really change the situation compared with cheaper OLEDs when it comes to daytime viewing. It is best suited to evening use or to a room where you have at least partial control over the lighting. It is still comfortable to use during the day, but it is definitely not a television designed for a very bright living room.

Panel details

Backlight Type
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
1204
Image processor
MT5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips OLED950 TV Panel details
Review Samsung S85H TV Panel details

TV features

6.5/10

7.3/10

  • System
    Google TV
    Tizen
  • System performance
    Good
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi
    Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Smart Features

The biggest plus of the OLED950 is the Google TV system — the manufacturer is increasingly moving away from it in cheaper models in favour of TitanOS, but here we are fortunately still provided with a full Android-based environment. This means access to a vast library of applications, a voice assistant, and convenient features like Chromecast. For unknown reasons, we have once again been unable to launch Windows Miracast in the editorial office, despite the manufacturer's claim that this option is available. On the positive side: Apple device users can rest easy, as the television supports AirPlay.

Classic Features

In terms of "classics", the television offers a rather basic set: teletext and Bluetooth connectivity. The most objections arise regarding the remote control. On one hand, it is sensibly designed with backlighting, "hybrid" switching between typical functions and a numeric keypad, and charging via USB-C. On the other hand, enthusiasm quickly wanes when it turns out that you need to aim it at the screen, as it operates on infrared.

Tizen

Samsung S85H runs on Tizen and, in terms of online features, there is little to criticise. The system is fast and responsive, and the selection of apps is one of the largest on the market. Besides the main streaming platforms you will also find many less popular services, so it’s unlikely you’ll be left without something you really need. Samsung is also developing SmartThings features, integration with other devices and an increasing number of AI-based solutions. There are really lots of possibilities here and some users will probably never explore half of them. A big plus is the promised seven years of system updates. For a television, which we usually keep much longer than a phone or computer, that matters. Tizen should therefore receive new features and fixes for a long time rather than being abandoned after two or three years. The S85H does not, in fact, feel like a cheaper model. We essentially get the same extensive ecosystem that Samsung offers in its more expensive TVs.

Classic features

Samsung’s approach to classic television features looks completely different. It’s clear that for several years the manufacturer has been placing increasing emphasis on "modern" services at the expense of traditional ones. The S85H is therefore not a TV that will particularly appeal to people who are used to extensive control over conventional broadcasting. The supplied remote illustrates this well. It is small, minimalist and has only the most necessary buttons, but lacks a traditional numeric keypad. That works well for streaming, but for those who frequently watch broadcast TV without a set-top box it may not be to everyone’s taste. It’s simply a consequence of the direction Samsung is taking its televisions...

Apps

9.6/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.5/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The factory file player in the OLED950 model works simply brilliantly. During our tests, the device handled virtually every format we provided. Whether they were video files, audio tracks or photos, the television played them without issue. It is difficult to find weak points in the handling of the most popular standards. However, if someone still feels something is lacking (which seems unlikely), the operating system comes to the rescue. With the presence of Google TV, we are not solely dependent on default solutions. At any time, we can enter the app store and install an external player, such as the popular VLC or Kodi. This gives us the assurance that the television can handle literally any file from our home library.

The Samsung S85H's USB file player works quickly and without major problems. The TV handles both videos and photos well, and with the latter we had no issues with unusual resolutions or high megapixel counts. Subtitle support is also a plus, with Polish characters displaying correctly and no additional settings required. The only real shortcoming was lack of support for the HEIC format, which is often used by Apple devices. Apart from that, the built-in player performs very well and will be more than sufficient for most people for everyday use with a USB stick or external USB drive.

Sound

8.2/10

7.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    85dB
    86dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The 2.1 speaker setup used here, with a total power of 70 W, provides a really solid dose of proper sound. It plays clearly, and thanks to the additional subwoofer at the back of the enclosure, the sound is deep and has a definite impact. This element is often missing in cheaper designs, where bass is virtually non-existent. However, we must face the truth when comparing it to the OLED910 model. That television, equipped with a built-in Bowers & Wilkins soundbar, simply sounds much better. Was it a good decision? In our opinion, the outstanding audio from the 910 model adds greater value. Choosing the 950 model makes sense mainly if you are big fans of Ambilight, and you deal with sound through an external home cinema or soundbar anyway.

In terms of sound, the S85H hasn't really changed from its predecessor. It still has a fairly basic 2.0 setup with a total power of 20 W, which sounds decent and, for such a slim TV, can even add a touch of bass. It's perfectly adequate for everyday TV viewing, but it's not at the level of pricier models, which can sound fuller and more 'spatial'. With that kind of picture, it really calls for at least adding a soundbar. All the more so as the S85H supports Dolby Atmos and Samsung's proprietary Q-Symphony, which allows a compatible Samsung soundbar to work with the TV's speakers rather than completely replace them. If you want to get more out of this setup for films, an external sound system is the most sensible addition.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

86dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy