LG QNED93A / QNED90A vs Haier K85F

Direct comparison

QNED93A / QNED90A

Info

K85F / K85FUX

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.3

5.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.8

    5.2

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.9

    5.2

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    4.6

  • Gaming on console

    8.5

    6.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    6.2

    4.1

  • Utility functions

    8.2

    5.5

  • Apps

    9.1

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    6.9

    4.8

Advantages

  • Quite good contrast

  • High number of dimming zones

  • Good HDR brightness (around 1400 nits)

  • Wide colour gamut coverage (around 96% DCI-P3)

  • 144 Hz mode and full set of gaming features (HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, G-Sync, FreeSync, HGiG, Game Bar)

  • Low input lag (7 ms at 120 Hz)

  • Good compatibility with PC, including 144 Hz and clear fonts,

  • WebOS with a rich assortment of apps and voice control

  • Magic Remote

  • Quite effective upscaling and image processing tools - it will work great for older content such as antenna TV or YouTube

  • Low input lag, excellent for gaming

  • Surprisingly good media player via USB

  • High contrast and decent black levels (VA panel)

  • Good text readability in PC monitor mode

  • Presence of gaming features: ALLM and VRR

  • Access to numerous applications thanks to GoogleTV

Disadvantages

No like
  • The local dimming algorithms require refinement

  • Very average viewing angles

  • Dolby Vision does not offer a significant improvement over HDR10

  • Catastrophic image quality in HDR mode

  • Low quality of workmanship and fitting of materials

  • Slow, stuttering and poorly translated Google TV system

  • Very poor sound quality from the built-in speakers

  • Problematic remote control (and no batteries included)

  • Poor viewing angles

  • Low brightness and weak anti-reflective coating

  • Low colour gamut coverage

Our verdict

The LG QNED93A is a television that, at first glance, appears to be a solid step forward compared to previous LCD models from this brand. On paper, we get quite a lot: a significantly larger number of dimming zones, 144 Hz refresh rate for gamers, support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision, and WebOS with a new Magic remote, which remains one of the most convenient control systems. The QNED93A shines particularly in gaming applications. Four full-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports allow for connecting consoles and PCs without any restrictions, and the low input lag remains consistent at both 120 and 60 Hz. For PC users, an additional advantage is the 144 Hz mode and full compatibility with G-Sync and FreeSync. Therefore, it can be confidently said that in terms of gaming features, the QNED93A holds its own against the competition. Another strong point is WebOS. LG's system has long been regarded as one of the most user-friendly in everyday use, and this is confirmed here. Everything is clear, and the Magic remote allows for controlling the television like a mouse pointer – quickly and intuitively. Brightness can also be considered a plus. At its peak, it managed to achieve results close to 1400 nits. This is sufficient for the picture to remain vibrant in brighter rooms, and for special effects in films or games to look convincing. The image processor handles scaling of older content well – television or films in lower resolution appear clearer and sharper than on many competing screens.

However, it cannot be denied that the biggest problem with the QNED93A lies in the local dimming algorithms. In scenes full of black, the screen can dim significantly, causing many details to simply disappear. The effect is such that contrast appears better at first glance, but at the cost of information that should be visible. An additional problem is the Dolby Vision mode, which usually improves certain aspects of screens, yet in this case, it makes little difference. The differences between dynamic and static metadata literally have to be searched for with a magnifying glass. This is simply disappointing because the hardware itself, with its number of dimming zones and stronger backlighting, provides grounds for a better result. So, who is the LG QNED93A for? It is a television that works excellently as a home entertainment centre, especially if you're considering gaming on a console or PC. In everyday television viewing and films in well-lit conditions, it also delivers a lot of satisfaction due to its high brightness and decent image processor. However, one must accept that in scenes with a lot of black and full HDR utilisation, this model does not match its competitors. LG has shown that it can create a very solid LCD screen, but it is also evident that not everything has been refined as well as in their OLED televisions.

The debut of the Haier brand in the European television market with the K85F model feels hurried, and after thorough testing, it seems almost unfinished. Analyzing this product leads us to a fundamental conclusion: its biggest problem is not the quality of the panel used. This, considering the price segment, is simply average, with the typical advantages of VA technology in the form of high contrast and equally typical disadvantages, such as poor viewing angles. What truly disqualifies this model as a home entertainment centre is the glaring lack of engineering refinement and, above all, software development. The list of shortcomings is long and starts from the very first contact with the device. Sloppy assembly, which could have been avoided during quality control, a poorly optimised and badly translated Google TV system, or annoying issues with basic functions like pairing the remote – all contribute to the picture of a product that seems to have been released to market without due diligence. The catastrophic image quality in HDR mode, resulting not only from low brightness but also from a complete lack of intelligent adaptation to the signal, only adds to this disappointing picture. However, it turns out that this model has a surprising second face. One needs to look at it not through the lens of a home television, but rather as a large and inexpensive display for special tasks. Then its shortcomings become less important, and unexpected advantages come to the fore: a fantastically working media player with USB, remarkable font readability from a PC, and access to a vast application database. In this role – as a screen in a conference room, hotel lobby, or simple advertising player – the Haier K85F performs surprisingly well. For the typical user looking for a reliable and simply well-functioning television for the living room in 2025, however, the Haier K85F is a proposal that is incredibly difficult to recommend with a clear conscience. It is a product full of contradictions, which fails in its primary, intended function on too many fronts.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
BuildQuality-Budget
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Black
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.3/10

5.6/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 308 (14 x 22)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

130,500:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

30,950:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

15,250:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

6,750:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,550:1

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,200:1

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,350:1

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,400:1

Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,500:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail
Review Haier K85F Contrast and black detail

We examined the 55-inch version of the LG QNED93A, equipped with a high-contrast VA panel. However, in the case of Mini-LED televisions, it is not just the panel itself, but primarily the number and operation of local dimming zones that determine the final effect. In this model, we counted as many as 308 zones, which already looks impressive from the start. For comparison, last year's QNED91T in the 65-inch variant had only about 160. The difference is enormous and shows that LG has made a serious step forward in this technology. On paper, it looks great, but practice quickly cools the enthusiasm. The contrast in the QNED93A can indeed be impressive – bright elements are clearly separated from blacks, and in many scenes, the depth of the image truly pleases the eye. The problem is that despite such a significant improvement in the backlighting design, the results are not much better than in last year's model. The algorithms controlling the dimming can be too aggressive. This is especially noticeable in darker sequences, where the screen dims to such an extent that subtle details disappear from view. Many viewers will appreciate the deeper blacks, but it is hard not to notice that this comes at the expense of the director's intentions. The most problematic are scenes with many small, bright elements. It is then that the typical halo effects, meaning glowing outlines, characteristic of LCD with local dimming zones appear around them. This phenomenon does not completely ruin the experience, but it reminds us that even with an increased number of zones, local dimming still has its limitations. Ultimately, the contrast in the QNED93A can be considered good, but we have the impression that the manufacturer did not pay enough attention to optimising the new model in terms of blacks and contrast.

Well then, let’s get to the point, which is how the Haier K85F handles black levels and contrast. The key information is that the television uses a VA panel, which has a significant impact on the image quality in dark scenes. It is precisely because of this that the contrast is really solid – our measurements showed values around 5000:1, which is much better than that of popular IPS panels.

However, one must remember that we are talking about equipment from the lower price range. Therefore, one cannot expect any advanced technologies, such as local dimming. The backlighting works across the entire surface of the screen all the time. How did this look during viewing? We took the film “Oblivion” with its cosmic landscapes for a test, and also checked classic black bars in other productions. The effect was quite decent. The black had good depth, but it was not perfectly pitch black – a subtle, navy blue glow could be seen, indicating that the panel's backlighting was still active.

HDR effect quality

5.8/10

3.4/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.1%, Bt.2020: 77.1%
DCI P3: 81.8%, Bt.2020: 61.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1330 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

219 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

678 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

160 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1016 nit

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

217 nit

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

212 nit

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

278 nit

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review Haier K85F Brightness measurement

Result

273 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality
Review Haier K85F HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality
Review Haier K85F HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A HDR effect quality
Review Haier K85F HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

Haier K85F

HDR luminance

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

HDR luminance

Although the number of local dimming zones in the LG QNED93A has not directly translated to noticeably better contrast, it is hard to deny one thing about this model – it is brighter than its predecessor. In synthetic tests, we recorded values around 1400-1500 nits, and more importantly, these results are reflected in real film scenes. In full-screen sequences flooded with white or bright lights, the screen could maintain high luminance, which created a truly decent amazing HDR effect. Unfortunately, where the television could showcase true class, that is in scenes requiring precision, all the magic dissipates. The dimming algorithms, which we mentioned earlier, operate so aggressively that small bright objects – such as distant lights, stars, or the moon – can almost completely disappear. A glance at the test scenes from the film Pan or Sicario 2 (screens 2 and 4) shows how subtle details are dimmed to the limits of their visibility. It's a pity, as a greater number of zones could theoretically have led to significantly better results. Fortunately, there are also strengths. The QNED93A performs well in terms of colour gamut coverage, achieving around 96% of the DCI-P3 standard. As a result, colours in films appear vivid and full, and the picture does not lose intensity even in more demanding scenes. Therefore, one could say that the HDR in this model is solid, although the underdeveloped local dimming algorithms hinder its full potential.

Let’s now turn to one of the hottest topics in the world of televisions, namely the quality of HDR effect. In the case of the Haier K85F model, we must unfortunately make it clear: if you are looking for equipment to watch content in a wide dynamic range, you should avoid this model at all costs. The main problem is its very low peak brightness, which during our tests barely reached 250 nits. To give you a better idea of what that means – such a value is fine for watching standard SDR content, but it is absolutely insufficient to showcase any real benefits of HDR. The image simply lacks the "power" to generate bright, striking highlights. All our measurements and tests on specialist patterns only confirmed this. As if that weren't enough, the television also struggles with colour reproduction. In this budget build, we won't find any technologies to expand the colour palette, such as quantum dot layers (marketed as "QLED"). As a result, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour space, which is crucial for HDR materials, is only around 80%. In practice, this means that the image will not only be dark but also devoid of the vibrant, saturated colours that the director wanted to show us.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

3.8/10

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Factory color reproduction
Review Haier K85F Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Factory color reproduction
Review Haier K85F Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

In filmmaker mode, the colour reproduction on the QNED93A was relatively accurate, although there were some reservations. In SDR content, the white balance was shifted towards warmer tones, which gave the screen a slight yellowish tint overall. The gamma, in turn, led to a slight brightness increase, making the image appear somewhat less natural, especially in scenes requiring precise shading (this is clearly visible in the comparison photo). This is not a problem that immediately stands out to every viewer, but more discerning individuals may feel that the image deviates from the aesthetics intended by the filmmakers. In HDR materials, the situation was somewhat different. The white balance, in this case, was quite good, ensuring that the whites neither leaned towards pink nor unwanted green hues. However, managing brightness turned out to be an issue. An analysis of the EOTF curve revealed that at certain moments, the television could be noticeably too dark where it shouldn't be, losing some detail and lowering the realism of the scenes. This spoiled the reception of HDR effects, which were theoretically supposed to make the biggest impression. For this reason, we decided to carry out calibration.

Well, how does the television perform with colours straight out of the box, without any interference from our side? The Haier K85F offers a full range of picture modes, such as Dynamic and Eco, but for anyone who wants to watch films according to the creators' intentions, only one really matters: Film mode. That is where we focused our tests, and unfortunately, its name has little to do with reality. The picture in the factory settings is very far from what we could call cinematic fidelity and requires numerous adjustments. Let's start with the white balance, which has a noticeable deficiency of red. In practice, this means that the entire image has a cool, bluish tint. The situation is even worse regarding brightness management, namely the gamma curve (for SDR) and EOTF (for HDR). Their graph resembles a real rollercoaster, which has a disastrous impact on the viewing experience. This results in unnatural dimming of SDR content, causing details in shadows to be lost, and in the case of HDR – excessive brightness, which further exacerbates the issue of clipping. Such a combination, namely too cool white combined with chaotic brightness and excessive blue saturation, results in significant errors in colour reproduction. Our measurements on the specialist ColorChecker chart revealed errors (Delta E) regularly reaching and exceeding values of 8-9. Put simply, errors above the threshold of 3 are already easily noticeable to the naked eye, so such a result means that the colours on the screen are simply heavily distorted.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.8/10

6.2/10

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Color reproduction after calibration
Review Haier K85F Color reproduction after calibration
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Color reproduction after calibration
Review Haier K85F Color reproduction after calibration

After professional calibration, the Filmmaker mode on the QNED93A has improved primarily in areas that matter most on a daily basis. We managed to correct the white balance and eliminate the yellowish tint in SDR content, which is what we watch most often – television, streaming services, or standard quality films. As a result, the colours look natural and pleasant, making the overall experience much more comfortable. We also made adjustments in HDR mode, but here the biggest issue turned out to be the EOTF curve. Although LG offers some flexibility in the settings, the television still manages brightness on its own terms. It is evident that the local dimming algorithms are not fully refined and can ruin the viewing experience by darkening parts of the image at inappropriate times. Nevertheless, it is worth opting for calibration of this model, especially the mode intended for everyday viewing.

Well, is there anything that can be done about this picture? Can professional calibration save the situation? The answer is both yes and no. It must be clearly stated that there are certain limitations we cannot overcome. The constraints of the design itself, meaning simply a poor panel and its narrow colour coverage, make it impossible to expect a reasonable HDR effect – we won't mislead you on that. The biggest beneficiary of our adjustments is undoubtedly the SDR mode, and it is indeed for watching such content, after calibration, that this television starts to make sense. We managed to somewhat tame the white balance. Although the television only offers basic 2-point adjustment (rather than precise 20-point), so it's not perfect, we successfully eliminated that unpleasant, cold "chill" in the picture. Above all, however, we noted a significant improvement in brightness management. The gamma curve, which previously resembled a rollercoaster, looks like an almost perfectly straight line after calibration. This is a sign that the television can finally display images without artificially dimming or brightening them. The conclusion is simple: even with such a cheap television, professional adjustment of the settings can achieve a lot and extract the maximum potential from it.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8/10

7.6/10

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Smoothness of tonal transitions

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the LG QNED93A is truly impressive. In most scenes, there are no artificial colour separations or banding effects visible. The dark shots are particularly surprising in a positive way – it is precisely in these that many televisions struggle, yet here the image remains smooth and coherent. In brighter segments, one can note subtle colour blending, however, they are not pronounced enough to significantly distract the viewer. During testing, we encountered a clear issue with DSE, or the so-called "dirty screen" effect. On our unit, the phenomenon was strong enough that in bright scenes, the corners visibly darkened, giving the impression of vignetting. This may be a flaw of the test unit, but during intense viewing, we found it hard to overlook.

It’s time to address a matter that goes unnoticed by many, but can be very irritating to the discerning (and not just) eye. We are talking about the fluidity of tonal transitions, or how smoothly the screen displays transitions between very similar shades of a single colour – for example, on a clear blue sky. We must admit that in this category, the Haier K85F performs quite decently considering its price. In bright scenes, such as the aforementioned sky or vast landscapes in the film "The Martian", there are no strong, distinct bands. Indeed, if you look closely, you will notice minimal imperfections, but generally, the effect is more than satisfactory. However, the situation changes when darker scenes appear on the screen, such as murky corridors in games or night landscapes. Here, banding, or the posterisation effect, becomes much more visible. Transitions in shadows and greys are no longer as smooth and can irritate the more sensitive eye. It’s not a level that would completely disqualify the television, but it’s clear that this is an area where costs have been cut.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.8/10

4/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Haier K85F Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

The LG QNED93A proves to be a very solid television for everyday use. Its image processor handles scaling extremely well, which means even older films or terrestrial television benefit from increased sharpness and detail. During the screening of "The Godfather," it is clearly visible how upscaling retrieves additional details from the image – the faces of the characters and the texture of their clothing appear much clearer than in the original material.

The digital image processing also deserves praise. The television is equipped with a function for reducing unwanted colour banding and screen irregularities. It works best in the "Medium" setting – subtly smoothing tonal transitions without excessively interfering with the image. As a result, the natural film grain is preserved, and the screen does not appear artificially smooth. It is possible that in some scenes slight colour banding can still be observed, but in practice, the effect is more beneficial than with a stronger intervention from the algorithm.

Let's move on to digital processing and image scaling, specifically how the Haier K85F handles lower resolution signals, such as those from standard television. Right from the start, we encounter an extremely annoying and completely incomprehensible issue – overscan that is enabled by default. This means that the television artificially enlarges the image, cropping its edges, and this happens on every source, even 1080p. To see the full frame, you have to dig through the screen settings each time and manually switch the format to "expand to 16:9". It's a detail, but it's devilishly frustrating. The very act of scaling content to 4K resolution can be summed up in one word: acceptable. And that's about it. The image processor does not strip details from the picture, nor does it generate jagged edges or other artifacts. It simply does its job, without any fireworks. It's alright, but nothing more. However, the biggest and most noticeable shortcoming in the digital processing section is the absence of a smooth tonal transition feature. This is an algorithm that could significantly reduce the annoying banding effect we mentioned earlier. Unfortunately, the manufacturer did not provide such a solution, condemning us to watch the imperfections of the panel and low-quality materials in full view.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.6/10

4.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
-
BFI function 120Hz
-
-
Brightness drop with BFI
56%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur ():

The LG QNED93A is equipped with a 144 Hz panel. This is primarily a nod to gamers, but the fact that higher refresh rates are increasingly making their way into televisions can be viewed positively. In everyday viewing, 120 Hz remains key, and in this respect, the QNED93A performs well. The manufacturer also provides the option to adjust the picture using the TruMotion system – the De-Judder and De-Blur sliders allow you to choose between a cinematic motion character with visible frames and a complete smoothing with theatrical motion.

The matrix in the K85F model operates at a native refresh rate of 60 Hz, which right from the start sets certain expectations regarding image fluidity. However, we must admit that we were very positively surprised when we found two separate sliders for motion control in the settings menu: one labelled as "Motion Blur Reduction" and the other "De-Judder". Such generosity in this price segment is an absolute rarity, as typically manufacturers offer at most one shared option. Unfortunately, our enthusiasm waned as quickly as it appeared. It soon became clear why Haier was so "generous" – the slider responsible for motion blur reduction is simply a dummy. Its adjustment brings absolutely no visible effect on the screen, so only one of the two options works.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

4/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    No

LG QNED93A is a television that has undoubtedly been prepared with gamers in mind. Right from the outset, we get a complete set – all four HDMI ports operate in standard 2.1, so regardless of whether we connect a console, PC or amplifier, we can be assured of full compatibility. This is important, as many manufacturers still limit themselves to two ports, and here nothing hinders the entire equipment from having maximum capabilities. There is also an automatic game mode (ALLM), which automatically switches the television to the appropriate settings when the console is turned on, as well as variable refresh rate (VRR). This ensures the picture doesn't stutter or jerk, even when the frame rate drops – whether in dynamic shooters or during races.

The 144 Hz panel gives an additional advantage in computer games. While 120 Hz is sufficient for consoles, in the case of PCs, the QNED93A allows for even more – every movement, every glance to the side is refreshed faster, and this makes a difference, especially in e-sports. The manufacturer also considered HDR in gaming – the television supports the HGiG mode, which are guidelines to ensure that the lighting effects are exactly as the game developers intended. To top it off, we get Game Bar – a special information bar that appears on the screen, showing parameters in real-time. You can monitor the frame rate, active VRR functions, or the level of input lag. This solution is useful not only for settings enthusiasts but for anyone who wants to quickly check what mode the television is operating in and whether everything is working as it should.

Let's move on to features for gamers, although we must emphasise at the outset that this is more of a proposal for the "casual" ones. The manufacturer boasts in the specifications about the presence of HDMI 2.1 ports, which looks impressive on paper, but in reality, it is largely a marketing ploy. What good is a modern port if the heart of the television is a panel with a refresh rate of 60 Hz? It physically cannot display a signal at 120 frames per second, even at lower resolutions, which deprives the HDMI 2.1 port of its most significant advantage. It's a shame. (That’s why we mark it as HDMI 2.0 in our tests). Another curious peculiarity is the television's reaction to attempts to calibrate HDR from the console level. Changes to brightness settings cause very unnatural image behaviour, which might suggest an incorrect implementation of the HGiG standard. To be honest, however, one shouldn't worry too much about this, because as we've mentioned numerous times, we simply do not recommend using any HDR content on this screen. However, to avoid being too negative, the Haier K85F also has two significant and unexpected advantages. The first is the presence of ALLM, or Auto Low Latency Mode, which switches the television to low latency mode as soon as it detects a connected console. The second, even bigger surprise, is support for VRR, or Variable Refresh Rate. While it works within a very modest range of 48-60 Hz, its mere presence is commendable. As a result, the image in games can experience less "tearing," which significantly improves the gaming experience.

Input lag

9.8/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
13 ms
1080p120
7 ms
2160p60
16 ms
13 ms
2160p120
7 ms

HDR

2160p60
15 ms
13 ms
2160p120
7 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
21 ms
13 ms
2160p120 DV
7 ms

The LG QNED93A has nothing to be ashamed of when it comes to latency. The television responds instantly to our actions, as seen in the initial tests with the controller in hand. In 120 Hz mode, the input lag drops to around 7 ms, which means almost immediate response – shots, passes, or precise movements of the joystick are instantly reflected on the screen. For 60 Hz content, the result rises slightly to just under 15 ms, but it still remains within the bounds of full comfort. An interesting feature is the Dolby Vision mode for games, which in the QNED93A works with the Xbox Series X console. Here, the lag increases to about 20 ms. In theory, this could be considered a detriment, but in practice, it is still a very good result. Even with such a demanding picture standard, the gameplay remains dynamic, and the differences in control are practically imperceptible.

We must, however, give Haier its due – there is one parameter in which this television absolutely shines and embarrasses many more expensive models. We are speaking about input lag, or signal delay. Our measurements showed an impressively low result of just 13 ms. This is a huge plus that makes gaming controls lightning-fast and incredibly responsive. In this regard, the K85F performs excellently.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
7ms
13ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Compatibility with PC
Review Haier K85F Compatibility with PC

A new feature of this year's model is the full support for 144 Hz refresh rates, which PC gamers will appreciate. The QNED93A works with both Nvidia graphics cards, offering compatibility with G-Sync, as well as with AMD products, where it operates with FreeSync Premium Pro. As a result, gameplay is smooth, without stuttering or tearing, and the panel itself performs very well in dynamic esports titles and demanding AAA productions.

Equally important is the clarity of the image for daily work. The television supports chroma 4:4:4, so fonts in Windows and applications are sharp and clear. However, we noticed a small detail – against a dark background with bright letters, subtle horizontal stripes may appear, resulting from the arrangement of subpixels. This is a minor detail that does not affect the convenience of using the television on a daily basis, but perfectionists might notice it after prolonged exposure to text. But we don’t think anyone would want to work on a 55-inch screen with text sitting less than 1 meter away from it 😉.

And what if you tried using this Haier as a monitor for your computer? Here, to our great surprise, the television performs remarkably well. For office work – it is ideal. This is all thanks to its proper support for what is known as chroma subsampling 4:4:4. In plain terms: every, even the smallest letter on the screen is sharp, without annoying coloured outlines or blurring. Of course, let's be straightforward – this is not equipment for PC gamers. 60 Hz is too little for them. But if you simply need a large screen for text work, browsing the internet, coding, or displaying presentations, the K85F will excel in this role. This is one of its strongest and, to be honest, most unexpected applications.

Viewing angles

2.9/10

2.8/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
78%
67%

QNED93A uses a VA panel, which means one thing: the category of viewing angles becomes its Achilles' heel. Already at an angle of about 45 degrees, brightness drops by as much as 80%, and colours begin to noticeably fade. This is the natural price for the high contrast that VA panels offer. There is no additional coating to enhance angles here, as in some more expensive models, which is why the QNED93A performs best when viewed head-on. If you are planning a large family screening where some viewers will sit more to the side, you must take into account that the picture will not be as attractive as it is in the centre of the screen.

At almost the very end of the assessment of the panel itself, we left the viewing angles, which unfortunately are one of its biggest weaknesses. However, it must be honestly admitted that this is no surprise – it is simply a natural and commonly known characteristic of VA-type panels. In the specimen we tested, interestingly, the brightness of the image did not drop dramatically when we moved away from the centre of the screen. The real problem, however, lies in the colours, which start to fade instantly. A slight change in position on the sofa is enough for the colours to lose their saturation and become washed out. In this respect, the Haier K85F presents a rather mediocre level, typical for this technology.

Daytime performance

6.2/10

4.1/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Daytime performance
Review Haier K85F Daytime performance
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Daytime performance
Review Haier K85F Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

Haier K85F: 276 cd/m2

LG QNED93A / QNED90A: 546 cd/m2

LG QNED93A uses a satin matrix, which handles glare suppression moderately well. It is certainly not on the level of matte screens, but it does not have the mirror-like surface feel of models with a glossy finish. As a result, reflections are not overly distracting, and the colours maintain their intensity even when light from a window strikes the screen. The brightness also scores positively. The average level in HDR mode hovers around 550–600 nits. This means that the television performs well in well-lit rooms, allowing viewers to enjoy a film even during the day, with the blinds only partially drawn. In the role of a large screen in the living room, the QNED93A performs quite well.

And how does the television perform in confrontation with daylight, for example in a brightly sunlit living room? Unfortunately, we do not have good news here. As we have already established, it is a television with relatively low brightness, which becomes a serious drawback when faced with sunlight. The situation is further worsened by the screen coating used. Instead of effectively suppressing reflections, its satin structure tends to unfavourably scatter them. In practice, this means that the reflection of a window or lamp turns into a large, blurred, milky halo, which degrades contrast and effectively hinders viewing. The conclusion is therefore clear: if the television is to be placed in a bright room, the K85F model will not be a good choice.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
White LED
Software version during testing
33.20.74
UKN2.241219.053
Image processor
mt5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV Panel details
Review Haier K85F TV Panel details

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

Haier K85F

TV features

8.2/10

5.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features
Review Haier K85F TV features

Smart Features

The QNED93A runs on webOS, which is one of the most enjoyable Smart TV systems. It comes with AirPlay, Screen Mirroring, Chromecast, and convenient voice control. The platform is quite clear and mostly fast, although in the tested unit, there were instances where the response to pressing the remote control required a moment of "thought". However, it's hard to consider this a serious issue – webOS still remains a refined system and will likely receive further updates that will enhance it even more.

Classic Features

In this model, LG has not included the old Magic remote with a numeric keypad, but the television itself performs excellently as a screen for everyday viewing of channels from the antenna. The EPG interface is readable, the television offers a TV guide, and we have the ability to record programmes from the built-in tuners directly onto a USB stick. Everything works correctly and intuitively. We only missed the PiP feature, which in 2025 is offered by just two manufacturers.

Magic Remote

The Magic remote is still the biggest difference compared to competitors. In 2025, it underwent a slight facelift – it has fewer buttons and resembles the minimalist remotes from Samsung. However, the cursor remains key, functioning like a magic wand. Just move your hand, and the pointer on the screen follows your movement. It's incredibly simple, yet very convenient. Navigation in the menu or entering passwords is much faster, and it's difficult to then switch back to traditional buttons.

GoogleTV on Haier K85F

The heart of the television is the Google TV system, which in theory should be its huge advantage. Access to thousands of applications and a wealth of features are promises we are familiar with. Unfortunately, in Haier's execution, it is one of the worst implementations of this software we have encountered. The system runs painfully slowly, and the interface is notoriously unresponsive. However, the real nightmare is the incorrect and often downright comical translations of some menu options, making it difficult at times to understand what is even being referred to. To make matters worse, during our testing, we were unable to activate the AirPlay function, which simply did not work.

Classic features on Haier K85F

Let's move on to the classic features and connections, as this is where the story gets even more interesting. The rich array of ports is definitely a plus, including four HDMI ports and a rarely seen mini-jack headphone output. Unfortunately, the television does not offer either USB recording or PiP mode. However, the real ordeal begins with the remote control. Our first attempts to pair it via Bluetooth to activate radio frequency (RF) control and voice functions ended in total failure. After dozens of attempts, we were sure it was just a manufacturing defect. And here's the surprise: after a long struggle, we discovered that the remote could be paired, but it had to be done from the native Google TV settings, completely bypassing the non-functioning Haier overlay. This is a perfect example of how terrible software can ruin basic functionality. Oh, and one more thing. In the box... there weren't even any batteries for the remote.

Playing files from USB

8.8/10

9.4/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the LG QNED93A handles most popular video and audio formats without any issues, so it is quite sufficient for basic use. However, during testing, we noticed two minor oversights. The first is the lack of support for HEIC files, which is Apple's photo format. The manufacturer claims that the television should be able to open them, but in practice, we were unable to confirm this. The second issue concerned text files with subtitles in TXT format. Fortunately, the other more common subtitle formats worked without any problems, so it's hard to consider this a real limitation in everyday use.

After all our complaints about the unfinished software, the moment came when we experienced absolute shock. It turns out that in this buggy and slow-operating system there is a function hidden that works almost perfectly and puts industry veterans to shame. We are talking about the built-in media player for files from USB drives. It is a true multimedia powerhouse that played virtually every video format we threw at it – from the most popular to the completely niche. Haier, a newcomer in the TV market, has achieved something that many manufacturers with decades of experience have struggled with for years. Who knows, perhaps it was originally intended to be a reliable player for conference rooms? Regardless of its origin, the result is excellent!

Apps

9.1/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

6.9/10

4.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    83dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The LG QNED93A sounds quite pleasant for built-in speakers in a television. The sound quality is fairly clear, and at medium volume levels, vocals and dialogues come across clearly. The bass, as is often the case in relatively slim designs, is not the strongest, but its presence can be heard and is entirely sufficient for everyday viewing of series. The maximum volume reaches around 81 dB and does not lead to strong distortions, although during more demanding cinematic scenes, it's evident that the system has its limitations. Overall, the sound can be described as decent and not off-putting. It certainly won't compete with a soundbar, but it won't ruin your film experience either.

When it comes to sound, the review will unfortunately be very brief. The biggest advantage of the built-in speakers of the K85F is really just that they are there and produce sound. Other than that, the sound is completely flat, devoid of any bass, and simply anemic. Yes, on the TV's box, we will find the Dolby Atmos logo, but when faced with the physical capabilities of these drivers, it is a feature that exists only on paper. The verdict can, therefore, only be one: when planning to purchase this television, you should immediately add a soundbar to your budget.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

83dBC (Max)

75dBC