LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A vs Philips OLED820

Direct compare

QNED85A / QNED86A / QNED87A / A6A / A6B / A6C

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”100”

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”77”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3810x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.0

8.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.4

    8.3

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.2

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.2

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    8.4

    9.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.0

    6.5

  • Watching in bright light

    5.8

    5.7

  • Utility functions

    8.4

    6.8

  • Apps

    9.1

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    7.7

Advantages

  • 120 Hz panel, good for sports and gaming

  • Very low input lag

  • Great for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG etc.)

  • Complete set of HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Good compatibility with PC (excellent font readability)

  • Bright picture (around 700 nits in HDR), performs well in moderately bright rooms

  • Good viewing angles (IPS)

  • Support for Dolby Vision

  • User-friendly webOS operating system with Magic Remote and voice assistant

  • Ability to record programmes to USB

  • Ideal contrast and black thanks to the WOLED panel

  • High HDR brightness (up to 1300 nits) and wide coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette (99%)

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Great motion smoothness, no motion blur, refresh rate up to 144 Hz

  • Full support for gamers: HDMI 2.1 (2 ports), VRR, ALLM, HGiG, Dolby Vision in games, low input lag

  • Ambilight that has a real impact on the perception of the image and distinguishes the television from the competition

  • GoogleTV system with a vast application base and excellent voice assistant

  • Extras including: Backlit remote control and swivel stand

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS:X audio formats

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very poor black levels and contrast due to the IPS panel

  • Lack of the advertised 144 Hz in PC mode

  • Aggressive "light bands" when local dimming is enabled (edge local dimming ruins evening movie sessions)

  • Confusion in model designations and versions – even televisions with the same name in different stores can have different stands (central or two feet) or frame colours, which can be very misleading when purchasing.

  • Only two HDMI 2.1 ports (with 2 consoles and a soundbar we are forced to "juggle" with the cables)

  • Lack of many classic "TV" functions, e.g. recording to USB or PiP mode, infrared remote may be irritating

  • Slight issues with colour blending (much better than last year but far from the competition)

  • Problems with font readability when working with PC (lack of full support for Chroma 4:4:4)

Our verdict

QNED86A6A is a television that truly does an excellent job in its price range when it comes to sports, gaming, and everyday TV viewing. The 120 Hz panel ensures smooth images and sharp motion, which both sports fans and gamers will appreciate. It also features low input lag along with a complete set of gaming functions such as HGiG, VRR, and ALLM. The television works just as well with a computer as it does with a console, so whether in the office or on a desk in the 43” version, it serves excellently as a work monitor. Another strong point is the webOS system. This is a fast, stable, and application-rich operating system that, paired with the Magic remote, offers very convenient operation. The new version of the remote is slimmer and fits better in the hand, while the on-screen cursor is a solution that many competitors lack. Additionally, there are classic features – USB recording, Bluetooth for headphones, and a full HDMI 2.1 set with eARC and Dolby Atmos support. This makes the televisions from the QNED85 series some of the most "multimedia" televisions in their class. However, there’s no point in mincing words; this model also has its significant flaws. Its biggest flaw is undoubtedly the contrast, or rather, the lack thereof. The IPS panel combined with edge-lit "mini-LED" is simply a very bad idea. The screen is just not suitable for watching movies in a dark living room. The blacks are bluish-grey, and local dimming can generate light strips reminiscent of lasers, which effectively spoil the desire to watch. This is not a choice that can be wholeheartedly recommended for home cinema. The second problem may not be directly related to the television itself but rather to its sales. It concerns the chaos in naming and discrepancies in derivative versions. The same model, even with the same marking, can have a different bezel colour or stand depending on the store. This can truly be frustrating for the buyer and evoke a sense of confusion. To summarise briefly: LG QNED86A6A is a great television for sports, gaming, and everyday television, with a user-friendly system and substantial functionality. But if you are looking for a screen strictly for movies or series and require deep blacks, it would be better to look towards televisions that can truly be called Mini-LEDs with full confidence.

Philips OLED820 is a very successful and significant step forward compared to last year's model, the OLED 819. For many people, the main reason for purchase will, of course, be Ambilight: the multi-coloured lighting system that distinguishes Philips televisions from the competition. It's not hard to see why, as it made a huge impression on us as well. It's not just an impressive gadget, but a real addition that can transform the experience of the content being viewed and add depth to it. However, Ambilight should not overshadow what the OLED820 offers as a screen. We have almost infinite contrast, high brightness in HDR films, and excellent colour reproduction, which improves even further after slight tweaking or professional calibration. This set guarantees one of the best images that can currently be found on the market, and on top of that, we are aware that the television offers something unique and unattainable anywhere else. It is also a device that performs well in gaming. The 144 Hz panel and HDMI 2.1 ports open up access to the full potential of next-generation consoles, and the low input lag ensures that gameplay is exceptionally responsive. The operating system – Google TV – also deserves praise. It is a much better solution than the proprietary Titan OS found in lower models of Philips, such as the OLED770. This is a serious argument for paying extra for this model. A larger library of applications, a more efficient voice assistant, and fewer system errors translate into a distinctly better daily experience. Of course, the Philips OLED 820 is not free from minor flaws – there are some shortcomings in the software, and certain functions could be better refined. Nevertheless, the overall presentation is very solid. Perhaps the OLED820 is not a revolutionary television, but it is a very successful and well-balanced proposition in Philips's offering. It combines excellent image quality, a full set of functions for gamers, and a unique addition in the form of Ambilight. If you are looking for a solid OLED in the mid-range that, aside from good image quality, offers something distinctive and simultaneously exceptional, the OLED820 should be high on your shopping list.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
Premium
Stand type
Central
Central
Stand type
stand-type-Graphite
stand-type-Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment
Swivel
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

3.7/10

10/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 6 (1 x 6)

Contrast:

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,050:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,750:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,800:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,850:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,350:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Although the manufacturer describes the QNED86A as a Mini-LED television, there is no multi-zone local dimming system here like those found in more expensive models. In practice, we are dealing with traditional edge lighting, which only allows for dimming horizontal bands of the screen from top to bottom. Combined with a low-contrast IPS/ADS panel, the effect simply falls short. If we decide to leave local dimming on, a problem arises – the television can illuminate selected portions in such a way that it looks like "flying lasers" cutting across the screen. This is very distracting, and it is difficult to speak of truly cinematic experiences under such conditions. Therefore, in our opinion, it is better to turn this feature off. However, one must reckon with the fact that the contrast then drops to around 1500:1, but at least the picture does not irritate with artificial flashes.

Contrast and black are the domain of OLEDs, and the Philips OLED820 is no exception. The applied WOLED panel from LG Display functions just like in the LG C5 models or the Samsung S90F, providing exactly what we expect – perfect black and infinite contrast. Whether we are watching challenging scenes full of intricate details or simpler shots immersed in uniform black, the television always performs flawlessly. It separates light from darkness with surgical precision, creating an extraordinary sense of depth in the image. And while one can debate various technologies, in this category, OLED simply reigns supreme, and the Philips OLED820 only confirms this rule.

HDR effect quality

6/10

7.5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.4%, Bt.2020: 73.4%
DCI P3: 99.3%, Bt.2020: 76.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

524 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

690 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

512 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

500 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1035 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1235 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1356 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1315 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

521 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED820

HDR luminance

Luminance of RGB colors

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

HDR luminance

Against a backdrop of contrast and black, the brightness of the QNED86A and the overall HDR effect perform much better. This is a television that can achieve around 700 nits under the best conditions, so in terms of luminance alone, there is nothing to be ashamed of. As a result, scenes with strong lights, explosions, flashes, or bright parts of the landscape look clear and can make an impression. Interestingly, even in more challenging moments with small, contrasting elements on the screen, the television manages well with their backlighting, and the details are quite visible. The problem arises when there are many dark tones. The lack of effective local dimming causes the black to practically disappear, and instead, we get a grey haze spreading across the entire screen. This kills the sense of depth and makes the image look flat, as if it lacks a cinematic character. In bright animations or colourful family films, this will not be a problem, as vibrant colours and bright light dominate. But in horrors or productions set in darkness, these limitations are very strongly felt. As a comfort, it is worth adding that the QNED86A is actually a QLED television with a PFS LED filter, which gives it very good coverage of a wide colour gamut. Both the DCI-P3 palette and the broader BT.2020 perform really well here. This makes the colours in HDR films saturated, juicy, and with the appropriate depth – even if the black itself disappoints, the colours can save the viewing experience and make the image look attractive.

When it comes to HDR quality, the Philips OLED820 uses the same class of WOLED panel found in its biggest rivals – the LG C5 and Samsung S90F. This means we can expect really solid results. This year, mid-range OLED panels can exceed the threshold of a thousand nits, and the tested model reaches around 1300 nits in some films. This is an outstanding result, allowing the director's vision to be conveyed with immense precision, as this is the brightness range in which contemporary productions are mastered. Of course, there are situations where even the OLED820 has to compromise. Full-screen scenes filled with white, like those in the film The Meg, can drop brightness to 400–500 nits, which clearly weakens the effect. This is a characteristic of OLED technology that has yet to be fully eliminated. Despite this limitation, it is hard not to appreciate the HDR in this model – high luminance and a wide DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage of 99% make the image simply look fantastic.

Factory color reproduction

5.6/10

6.7/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

We primarily tested the QNED86A in Filmmaker mode, which is designed to provide the most faithful picture. Unfortunately, right out of the box, there were quite a few shortcomings. The most noticeable was the poorly tuned white balance – there was a lack of blue, causing the overall image to take on a slightly yellowish, and at times even orange hue. An even bigger problem turned out to be the way the television manages brightness. Due to its technical limitations – specifically, local dimming that only works along the edges of the screen – the QNED86A tends to oversaturate entire scenes. This is where the flattening effect we mentioned earlier comes from. Instead of clear depth and contrast, we get something akin to “boosted brightness,” which can strain the eyes over time.

The colour reproduction in the factory settings really surprised us, and positively so. The Philips OLED820, switched to Filmmaker mode, immediately showed that it was quite well tuned in terms of colour. The white balance was relatively accurate, though there was a slight deficiency in the blue hue, which occasionally gave the image a slightly yellowish tint. However, this is not a flaw that particularly detracts from everyday viewing. A bigger issue arose with the brightness characteristics. The gamma curve clearly deviated from the ideal, with the line below the expected values, causing the image to be excessively brightened, and the colours looked as if they were covered with a light milky filter. This effect was also noticeable in tests using the Colour Checker pattern, where more pronounced errors appeared.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.6/10

9.3/10

What has been saved in the QNED86A6A is undoubtedly the colours. After calibration, the white balance was set with great precision, ensuring that deviations on the Colour Checker palette mostly did not exceed the visibility threshold for the human eye. In other words – the hues finally looked natural, without the strange yellow or orange tones that previously spoiled the perception. Unfortunately, even the best calibration cannot circumvent the structural limitations. The already very modest number of local dimming zones and their unfortunate placement mean that the analysis of the EOTF curve in films still showed clear over-brightening of scenes. The picture tended to flatten, lacking cinematic depth. Fortunately, this effect is not so noticeable in older productions or in SDR content. There, the calibration truly makes a difference and allows one to harness the QNED so that the image can be appealing. However, the specifics of this construction – especially the issues with contrast – cannot be completely bypassed.

After calibration, both the Filmmaker mode and the gaming mode gained a lot. A slight adjustment of the white balance and an improvement in brightness characteristics produced excellent results in SDR content – the image looked almost perfect, natural, and very close to reference. In the case of HDR materials, the situation was similar, the colours were presented wonderfully, and it was hard to find anything to criticise. However, we noticed a certain feature, which we already pointed out when comparing scenes from the film Billy Lynn. The analysis of the EOTF curve showed that the television has a slight tendency to dim details in the blacks, so the darkest parts are not always displayed exactly as intended by the director. Nevertheless, the effect after calibration is stunning, and the OLED820 is emerging as one of the more interesting screens in its class. It just needs a little pampering, and there really is nothing to worry about.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.9/10

6.5/10

The colour blending is one of the stronger points of the QNED86A. During everyday viewing, the image is presented very smoothly, without noticeable "steps" or sudden transitions between colours. The television handles colour merging in a quite natural way, so with most material, it is difficult to spot issues with gradation. Any imperfections only appear under extreme conditions – for example, in the darkest parts of films, where even much more expensive televisions can encounter problems. There you might notice slight banding or characteristic stripes, but these are marginal situations that should not interfere during normal usage. Overall, the QNED86A performs quite well in this category and has nothing to be ashamed of in comparison to the competition.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is unfortunately the Achilles' heel of the Philips OLED820. During testing, we noticed slight issues with colour blending – both in bright and darker scenes, one can perceive distinctive banding that detracts from the naturalness of the image. It must be acknowledged that compared to last year's OLED 819 model, there is a significant improvement, but nevertheless, the competition performs better in this category.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.8/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

If someone is worried about potential "steps" when blending colours, there is a simple way in the QNED86A to address this. Just activate the feature called Smooth Gradation and set it to a medium level. Then the television really smooths out all those unwanted transitions quite well – especially in older productions – and it does so in a way that film grain doesn't disappear, nor do strange artefacts appear. In other words, it can be used without concern.

The upscaling itself also performs quite well. Of course, there are no miracles here – with lower quality sources, you can notice characteristic ringing. Fortunately, there is a sharpness slider in the menu, and if someone prefers a more "soft" image, it can be quickly adjusted to personal taste.

Fortunately, the earlier effects of the mentioned posterisation can be quite effectively mitigated. The "distortion reduction" function set to a medium level deals with unwanted colour banding, improving the smoothness of tonal transitions. It does happen that it works a bit too aggressively and also smooths out some details – such as minor skin imperfections of the actors – but nevertheless, it can be considered worth using without substantial compromises. The upscaling in the OLED820 also performs quite well. The test image with the model is exceptionally soft, sometimes even too much so, although this can be rectified by slightly boosting the sharpness in the picture menu – this is really a matter of individual preference. The absence of overscan issues with very low-resolution content is also commendable, meaning we don't have to worry that the image will be unnecessarily cropped.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.9/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
120Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
62%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Smużenie ():

Smużenie (4K@144Hz):

The QNED86A is equipped with a panel boasting a refresh rate of 120 Hz, so it can be said from the outset that it is suitable for both sports and gaming. And indeed, it is – the image appears smooth, and motion blur is not particularly intrusive. IPS panels have always had some issues with this, and here too, slight blurring can sometimes be noticed, especially in very dynamic scenes, but it is not something that ruins the viewing of a match or a fast-paced game. For cinema and sports fans, LG has included the traditional TruMotion smoothness enhancer. In the menu, we have two sliders – one for movies (De-Judder) and the other for sports (De-Blur). The first adds missing frames and can be adjusted to modify the character of motion – from raw, cinematic to a smoother, more ‘theatrical’ look. The second improves sharpness during dynamic actions, so it's worth turning it up a bit if you watch a lot of sports.

The fluidity of motion is an area where OLEDs always shine, and the Philips OLED820 confirms this rule. The panel itself offers a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which primarily benefits PC gamers, but even with standard television sources or consoles, where it operates at 120 Hz, the motion is fast, sharp and simultaneously smooth, without signs of blurring. This is thanks to the remarkable response time between pixels, which maintains image clarity in every dynamic scene. The manufacturer has also added its own smoother called "Motion Style". In the menu, we find two sliders – the first, responsible for fluidity, allows adjustments to the number of artificially added frames in films. This way, we can choose a raw, cinematic character with a distinctly visible film frame or a more theatrical image with smooth motion. The second slider is for motion blur reduction, particularly useful in sports broadcasts. Here, we definitely recommend setting it to the maximum value, as the effect is truly excellent.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 120Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

In terms of gaming, the LG QNED86A6A is a complete tool. It features four HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s, which means that whether you connect a PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X, or a powerful PC, everything will run in full 4K at 120 Hz with support for all functions. This is a significant advantage, as some competitors still only offer two such ports, which can be troublesome with multiple devices. It also includes VRR, or variable refresh rate, which eliminates screen tearing, as well as ALLM, which automatically activates game mode when the console is turned on. Dolby Vision Gaming is also included, along with proper implementation of the HGiG format, so titles that support these formats look more vivid and detailed. On top of all this, there is the Game Optimizer – a sort of control centre for gamers. From this interface, you can view picture parameters in real-time, quickly change modes, activate additional features, or adjust image settings to your personal preferences. The LG QNED86A6A essentially has everything one could expect from a modern gaming television.

The Philips OLED820 is one of the most complete televisions for gamers. On board, we find practically everything one could expect: two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps (it's a shame there aren't four), variable refresh rate VRR, automatic game mode ALLM, support for Dolby Vision in games, and a good implementation of the HGiG mode. The television handles lower resolutions at 120 Hz with ease, so one can count on considerable flexibility when choosing different picture modes on the console. Philips also includes a Game Bar – a panel that allows changing picture modes, adding a crosshair, or previewing parameters. Although it looks rather clunky and is less polished than that of the competition, it does its job. In practice, therefore, the OLED820, in addition to a full set of four HDMI 2.1 ports, offers nearly everything a gamer could need.

Input lag

9.9/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
15 ms
13 ms
1080p120
6 ms
5 ms
2160p60
14 ms
13 ms
2160p120
6 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
13 ms
2160p120
6 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
15 ms
13 ms
2160p120 DV
6 ms
5 ms

There is really nothing to complain about here. The QNED86A6A achieves excellent results – around 5 ms with 120 Hz content and roughly 15 ms with 60 Hz. These values will easily satisfy both console gamers and those who connect a PC to the television. The response to movements is instantaneous, so you can forget about delays between the image and the action on the controller.

The input lag on the Philips OLED820 is truly at a reference level. Measurements showed values below 5 ms, placing it among the absolute top televisions available on the market. Even the Dolby Vision mode does not pose any problems in this regard, which is quite a rare phenomenon. In practice, this means lightning-fast response to every movement, no noticeable delays, and complete comfort in dynamic games. In short, superb results that will delight even the most demanding gamers.

Compatibility with PC

8/10

6.5/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Very Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
6ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
RWBG
Max refresh rate
120Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

LG QNED86A, thanks to the use of an IPS matrix, a full RGB subpixel layout, and correct implementation of chroma 4:4:4, makes fonts look fantastic on the QNED86A6A. The text is sharp, clear, and legible, making the television ideal for office work. This is important, as this year the model also debuts in a 43" size, and such a variant can easily land on a desk and serve as a large monitor. Of course, some users who opt for the 43" version will be gamers, and here too there are no reasons for complaints. The television supports 4K at 120 Hz, so gameplay is smooth and enjoyable. It's a bit of a shame that there is no higher refresh rate mode like the 144Hz declared by the manufacturer, as PC gamers would surely appreciate that. Despite this, the QNED86A6A performs really well as a monitor for gaming and work.

Cooperation with a PC in the case of the Philips OLED820 varies depending on the application. For gaming, it performs exceptionally well: a high refresh rate of 144 Hz combined with G-Sync support provides the smoothness and responsiveness that other televisions can envy. The situation is less favourable when it comes to text work. The lack of proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4 causes fonts on coloured backgrounds to appear slightly blurred, which significantly reduces work comfort. Therefore, it's hard to recommend the OLED820 as a screen for office work with text or numbers. It's a shame the manufacturer hasn't learned from last year's models and this flaw continues to be repeated.

Viewing angles

6.9/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
61%
34%

QNED86A6A performs very well in this regard. The IPS panel used here ensures that the image maintains its brightness and colour saturation even when viewed from an angle. There is none of the fading effect often seen in cheaper TVs with VA panels. Of course – there is no point comparing this to the level offered by organic panels, where colours and contrast remain perfect from almost every angle. But as far as LCD TVs go, this is definitely one of the better results and is more than sufficient for watching films or sports together on the sofa with a larger group.

The viewing angles in the Philips OLED820 are another advantage that should please you. OLEDs have always been characterised by almost perfect angles, so regardless of where we look from, the image remains clear and legible. Indeed, the classic WOLED matrix does not compare to technologies like MLA OLED or QD-OLED, but it's still hard to find fault here. The angles are simply excellent.

TV efficiency during daytime

5.8/10

5.7/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips OLED820: 345 cd/m2

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A: 462 cd/m2

QNED86A6A is not a champion of brightness, but it manages adequately. Thanks to the moderately high brightness of the panel and quite decent reflection handling, the television will perform well in typical, moderately lit living rooms. The image remains clear, and the colours do not lose their intensity in daylight. However, let's not fool ourselves; this is not a screen that will cope in extremely bright conditions, where sunlight streams through large windows and floods the room.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
PFS LED
Software version during testing
33.20.74
TPM231WW_R.201.100.146.207
Image processor
MT5896 3GB

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

TV features

8.4/10

6.8/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

Smart Features: webOS

QNED86A6A operates on the well-known webOS – a system that has been a strong point of LG televisions for years. Everything runs quickly and stably, applications launch without significant delays, although the interface can occasionally feel a bit overwhelmed by advertisements. Fortunately, on a day-to-day basis, convenience outweighs these shortcomings. A significant advantage is the Magic Remote control, which allows you to operate the cursor like a mouse – it's one of those solutions that you quickly get used to and find it hard to give up later. In the new version, the remote is slimmer, as it has been stripped of the numeric keypad. Some will appreciate the simplicity, while others will miss the classic set of buttons; it's more a matter of habit.

Classic Features

We also find a few features on board that may not always be obvious in 2025. There is the ability to record programmes from the built-in DVB-T2 tuners to USB, so you can easily return to a match or series at any time. In the evening, Bluetooth headphone support will come in handy – especially if someone in the house falls asleep quicker than we do. Additionally, there is a full set of HDMI 2.1 ports with eARC support and audio formats such as Dolby Digital and Dolby Atmos.

GoogleTV on OLED820

Philips OLED820 runs on the Google TV system, which immediately places it among televisions that truly offer user freedom. It’s a fantastic platform that needs no introduction – it boasts almost an endless number of applications, from popular VOD services to niche programmes or games. Google TV also allows you to personalise the home screen, tailoring content to our preferences, so the television actually “learns” our viewing style. A significant advantage is also the voice assistant from Google – fast, natural, and effective. It can understand even less obvious questions, and in practice, it works much better than many competitors. Unfortunately, there was a hiccup – the screen mirroring feature simply did not work during testing. This can be considered a minor issue, but in 2025, such things simply shouldn’t happen.

Classic Features of OLED820

When it comes to classic additions, the OLED820 does not try to play conservative notes. On one hand, we get a backlit remote control with a numerical keypad that is quite well organised and easy to use. On the other hand – you have to aim it at the screen, as it operates on infrared, which is more reminiscent of equipment from a decade ago than a modern television. It also lacks some features that are often found in competitors – there is no USB recording from tuners or a PIP mode. A nice touch among the classic solutions is the analogue mini-jack headphone input. This is rare today and could prove useful – whether for a senior with an additional headphone station or for someone who would like to connect older speakers.

AmbilightTV OLED820

One cannot overlook Ambilight, which is a hallmark of Philips. This solution impacts not only the appearance of the television but also the reception of content. The illumination system can be set up in various ways, from a multi-coloured mode that dynamically tracks the image to calmer, static backlighting. We definitely recommend the latter option, as the gentle light behind the screen makes the content being watched, combined with the OLED matrix, look even deeper and more engaging. It’s a simple yet very effective addition that has given Philips televisions character for years.

Playing files from USB

8.9/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the QNED86A6A performs quite well with the most popular audio and video formats. During testing, we had no issues playing MP4, MKV, or MP3 files; everything played smoothly and without stutters. The television also handled most images, although we encountered a typical barrier for many manufacturers – lack of full support for the HEIC format from Apple. So if you use an iPhone daily and store photos in this standard, you will need to convert them beforehand or, better yet, transfer them using AirPlay. Other than that, it’s hard to find fault as, for a built-in solution, it's really decent.

The Philips OLED820 has a built-in file player with USB, which at first glance looks quite clunky, but in practice works surprisingly well. One could even say that it is one of the best built-in players available in televisions. It handles practically every type of file: photos, videos or music, with a few minor exceptions that most of the competition does not support either. And if someone still feels like something is missing, there is always the option of installing the VLC application from the Google Play library, and the problem disappears.

Apps

9.1/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

6/10

7.7/10

  • Maximum volume
    84dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

In terms of sound quality, the QNED86A6A performs quite decently, but there's no denying that it isn't at a level that would impress home cinema enthusiasts. The sound is clear and distinct, with dialogues easy to hear, but overall it sounds rather flat and definitely lacks solid low tones. For everyday television viewing, streaming services, or news, this level is acceptable; however, if you plan to watch movies or play games more often, even a basic soundbar will make a significant difference.

The Philips OLED 820 features a built-in 4.1 speaker system with a total power of 70 W. At the back of the casing is a subwoofer, which is responsible for quite solid and deep bass. The classic speakers responsible for the rest of the range are located at the bottom of the television, which means that the sound does not always spread in the way we would want. However, the overall sound can be considered acceptable – series, television programmes, or occasional music listening are satisfactory, with a slight bass support. This should be sufficient for daily use, although we still recommend purchasing even an inexpensive soundbar, which will significantly improve the user experience.

Acoustic Measurements

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC