LG MRGB85B vs Samsung S90H (WOLED)

Direct comparison

MRGB85 / MRGB86 / MRGB87 / MRGB88

Info

S90H / S92H / HAE / HAT

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”86”

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”83”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.9

8.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.2

    8.6

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.0

    8.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.4

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    8.3

    9.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.4

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    6.1

    6.5

  • Utility functions

    7.7

    7.3

  • Apps

    9.1

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    6.4

    8.4

Advantages

  • Extensive gaming features

  • Three full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Supports 4K at 144 Hz, VRR, G-Sync and FreeSync

  • Low input lag

  • Supports Dolby Vision HDR

  • Fast and user-friendly webOS

  • Magic Remote with gyroscope

  • Decent brightness and a wide colour gamut

  • Perfect blacks and infinite contrast (OLED)

  • Very high HDR brightness (up to 1400 nits)

  • Effective anti-reflective coating (matte, glare-free)

  • Reference-grade colour reproduction after calibration

  • Excellent motion clarity (no motion blur)

  • Excellent for gamers (4x HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, low input lag)

  • Game Motion Plus feature

  • Refresh rate up to 165 Hz

  • Wide viewing angles

  • Fast and fully featured Tizen

  • Good audio

Disadvantages

No like
  • Average black level

  • Aggressive local dimming control (edge-lit)

  • Average HDR picture quality

  • Poor viewing angles and noticeable VA panel smearing

  • In strong light colours lose some depth (a characteristic of matte coatings)

  • No TV features such as USB recording or PIP

  • No support for DTS:X (an issue for Blu-ray fans)

  • Limited colour saturation compared with the QD-OLED variant

Our verdict

The LG MRGB85 is a television that is best suited to gamers and users who are attached to webOS. In that respect it is hard to fault. It offers plenty of benefits for gamers thanks to a very high panel refresh rate. Add to that the smoothly operating webOS, which stands out above all for the convenient Magic Remote and a full set of features for traditional television. The problem begins when you look at the overall picture quality and compare it with the price the manufacturer is asking for this model. The MRGB85’s launch price is, to say the least, difficult to regard as attractive compared with competing models. For similar money you can find televisions offering much more advanced backlighting and, above all, better black level control. What causes the most controversy, however, is the naming and the way LG positions this model. True, the MRGB85 uses a tri-colour backlight, but it is edge-lit. It is therefore hard to call this a fully fledged RGB Mini-LED in the sense commonly used for TVs that employ a large number of independently controlled zones behind the panel. In practice the limitations of local dimming are very noticeable and they significantly harm the viewing experience in dark scenes. That does not mean the MRGB85 is a bad television. It handles everyday content well, offers decent colours, respectable brightness and a very wide feature set. Picture from a standard SDR source can look really good, and Dolby Vision partly helps to hide weaker brightness handling in HDR. However, it is hard to shake the impression that the biggest problem with this model is not the hardware itself but its price and its overly ambitious positioning in the market. If someone is looking mainly for a gaming TV, values the convenience of webOS and finds it on a large promotion, the MRGB85 can make sense. At its current price, however, it falls behind, because the competition today simply offers more in terms of picture quality.

The Samsung S90H is a TV that simply makes a superb impression. The combination of an OLED’s absolute black, high brightness and excellent motion clarity gives a picture that’s hard to look away from. And that’s exactly what we expect from a good OLED TV. The matte anti-reflective coating also works very well. Reflections in bright sunlight stop being a major problem, and thanks to the presence of a conventional polariser blacks do not shift as much towards greyish maroon tones as with the QD-OLED variant. Add a lightning-fast Tizen, an excellent suite of gaming features led by Game Motion Plus, and surprisingly good, full-bodied sound from the built-in speakers. Are there any weak points? Of course. Tonal gradations are not quite as perfect as on QD-OLED, and viewing angles remain slightly inferior. In practice, though, these are mostly minor quibbles, especially since WOLED has its own advantages, particularly in a bright room where it better preserves blacks and colour saturation. Overall, the QD-OLED variant still comes out slightly ahead, but this time the difference is not as pronounced as it was a year ago. For most people it should not be the deciding factor. So our advice is this: rather than obsessing over panel type, choose the size that best fits the room. Whether you buy a WOLED or a QD-OLED model, you’ll get a mature, versatile and very well-balanced TV. As every year, the S90H series has a firm place among the best-value OLEDs of 2026.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 3 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Premium
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5/10

10/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 6 (1 x 6)

Contrast:

Review LG MRGB85B Contrast and black detail

Result

12,100:1

Review LG MRGB85B Contrast and black detail

Result

6,200:1

Review LG MRGB85B Contrast and black detail

Result

15,900:1

Review LG MRGB85B Contrast and black detail

Result

6,000:1

Review LG MRGB85B Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

LG MRGB85 uses a VA panel, so even without additional measures it offers better black levels than models based on IPS or ADS panels. In simpler scenes the image has decent depth and can look quite convincing. The biggest limitation appears, however, when local dimming is enabled. The TV uses an edge-lit backlight positioned at the bottom of the screen. As a result it cannot precisely control the brightness of small parts of the picture. When a single bright element appears on a dark background, an entire vertical band often lights up. This is accompanied by a distinct halo, and even more noticeable is the backlight's behaviour itself. When scenes change, brightness can jump up and down sharply, causing the image to noticeably pulse in a dark room. Local dimming can be turned off completely in the TV menu. Contrast then drops noticeably, but the image becomes much more stable and the frequent flicker of the backlight disappears. In practice some users may therefore willingly give up deeper blacks in favour of a calmer, more predictable picture.

Since the Samsung S90H uses an organic display, it deserves the highest possible score in terms of contrast and black level. This applies, of course, to both variants available on the market, both the WOLED version we tested and the QD-OLED variant. Because each pixel is an independent light source and can switch off completely, the TV delivers utterly perfect blacks and infinite contrast. In practice this translates into exceptional image depth and a perfectly sharp separation of bright details from a dark background. There is no sign of any halo effect (blooming), which even top LCD TVs with Mini LED backlighting still struggle with today. You will appreciate the true magic of the WOLED panel above all during evening viewing in a darkened room, when dark areas of the frame gain extraordinary richness, a striking three-dimensionality and a wealth of details hidden in the shadows.

HDR effect quality

5.7/10

7.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 96.2%, Bt.2020: 74.4%
DCI P3: 99.4%, Bt.2020: 75.9%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review LG MRGB85B Brightness measurement

Result

583 nit

Review LG MRGB85B Brightness measurement

Result

401 nit

Review LG MRGB85B Brightness measurement

Result

569 nit

Review LG MRGB85B Brightness measurement

Result

423 nit

Review LG MRGB85B Brightness measurement

Result

455 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1374 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1419 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1570 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1395 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

713 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung S90H (WOLED)

LG MRGB85B

Luminance of RGB colors

LG MRGB85 offers moderate brightness. On test patterns it reaches about 700 nits, which by itself is a decent result. In actual movie scenes the values are lower and most often fall between 400 and 600 nits. Bright, expansive shots perform best. In scenes with a lot of black the TV noticeably limits luminance, trying to maintain the highest possible contrast. The HDR effect is therefore visible, but it is far from the level offered by more advanced Mini-LED designs. Especially in darker parts of films the limitations of edge-lit backlighting and imprecise local dimming become noticeable again.

HDR Colors

A much stronger suit of the MRGB85 is its colors. The TV covers about 95% of the DCI-P3 color space and 74% of BT.2020, allowing HDR material to look vivid and striking. Colors are well saturated, and the difference compared with basic LCD TVs is clearly visible. It is worth noting, however, that this is not a classic RGB backlight, where each of the three primary colors is generated by a separate diode. Red is produced by a PFS phosphor, which expands the palette and yields more saturated red shades. This solution works well for color reproduction, but it does not change the limitations of dimming itself. The LEDs are not driven independently in the way the series name might suggest... so it turns out that Mini RGB is not the same as Mini-LED RGB!

Samsung S90H in the WOLED variant is still an exceptionally bright TV for its price bracket, although compared with the QD-OLED version it is slightly dimmer. The difference is not as significant as in last year’s F series, where the gap could reach as much as 500 nits. Here the parameters of both panels are very similar, and differences in peak brightness are only in the order of 100–150 nits. In small-area measurements the S90H on the WOLED panel easily reaches levels close to 1500 nits. Such a reserve of power allows HDR dynamics to be reproduced phenomenally; all highlights, light reflections and explosions have the necessary punch, exactly as the creators intended in the editing studio. As with most OLED displays, when a very bright scene fills the whole screen protection systems activate and brightness naturally falls to around 700 nits. It is worth emphasising that this is still an excellent result on the market. Often noticeably better than many Mini LED screens in the same segment.

Colour gamut coverage

The biggest difference between the two S90H variants lies in colour reproduction and saturation. This results directly from the different construction of the WOLED panel, which uses an additional white subpixel. As a consequence, colours at very high brightness do not reach the same intense saturation, and the volume of the wide gamut is somewhat more limited than in QD-OLED. That does not change the fact that in everyday use these differences will be hard for most viewers to spot. The DCI-P3 space we measured reaches nearly 99% on the WOLED panel, which means that in the vast majority of real film scenes both variants will present an almost identical picture. The true distance only reveals itself in rarer, exceptionally demanding productions that use the ultra-wide BT.2020 gamut. Due to the specifics of the WOLED panel’s construction, coverage of that standard is about 15% lower compared with the S90HAT with a QD-OLED panel, so the brightest, heavily lit colours in HDR may appear slightly less vivid.

Factory color reproduction

5.6/10

7.6/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the TV in Filmmaker Mode, because among the available settings it offered the image closest to the reference. However, the out-of-the-box colour reproduction was not perfect. The largest deviations concerned the white balance, with the image showing too much red and not enough blue, which caused the whole picture to shift noticeably towards warmer tones. Whites took on a slightly yellowish tint, and skin tones and bright parts of the image did not always look natural. It was not a fault that completely ruined the viewing experience, but in direct comparison with the same screen after calibration the difference was readily apparent.

In Filmmaker mode, which we strongly recommend switching on straight out of the box, the S90H offers very good factory colour tuning. Colours are natural and faithful to the creators' intent, without the irritating oversaturation found in more aggressive presets. However, as is often the case without full calibration, no two units are identical. In our test the white balance was slightly lacking in blue, causing the image to lean a little towards warmer, yellowish tones. This was most noticeable in bright scenes, such as the snowy sequences from Star Wars. Additionally, the gamma curve was slightly low at 2.2, which produced a minor lift in shadow detail. In HDR mode the tuning was somewhat better, showing only a slight undersaturation in the red region.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

9.2/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Calibration primarily allowed us to correct the white balance and remove the previously noticeable warm tint. After adjustment the whites stopped leaning towards a yellow cast and the colours became more neutral and natural. The biggest improvement was seen in SDR material, where the picture looked even and much closer to reference. A similar effect was achieved in HDR. After calibration the image became more organised, although not all of the TV's limitations could be eliminated. The greatest reservations still concerned intense reds, which were not always reproduced with sufficient precision. In practice the MRGB85 handles everyday SDR content very well, whereas in more demanding HDR material its limitations remain clearly visible.

After a full calibration it’s fair to say the S90H in WOLED guise looks almost perfect. In SDR mode colour inaccuracies drop to ultra-low levels and Delta E values very rarely exceed 2. That’s a phenomenal result, so if you care about perfectly faithful colour reproduction it’s definitely worth considering calibration. The calibrated HDR mode also performs very well, with the white balance stabilised and earlier deviations eliminated. After professional fine-tuning it’s really hard to find anything to criticise, because the TV delivers an image with almost reference-level naturalness and three-dimensionality. The slightly lower score in this category compared with the QD-OLED variant is solely due to the aforementioned limitation in saturation in extremely bright scenes; the tuning options and colour fidelity themselves are at the highest level.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.9/10

8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

LG MRGB85 handles tonal transitions quite well. In bright scenes posterization is least noticeable and the TV has no problem separating individual shades. Tonal transitions fare somewhat worse in dark scenes, where posterization, in the most demanding moments transitioning into dark shades of grey, can be more noticeable. However, this is rather typical for most TVs. It is worth adding that similar behaviour can be observed in Dolby Vision mode, where posterization on the MRGB85 is slightly worse than usual.

The smoothness of tonal transitions here is at a very solid level, and the variant with a WOLED panel has been noticeably improved compared with last year’s F-series model. Troublesome gradient errors and visible banding occur much less often. Despite this clear improvement, it still does not reach the level offered by QD-OLED technology. In almost every direct comparison, a QD-OLED panel handles transitions between shades a little more precisely. In summary: regarding gradients, the WOLED panel is clearly better than in previous generations, but the QD-OLED variant still maintains a noticeable advantage in this category.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.8/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Upscaling and digital image processing perform quite well on the LG MRGB85. The Alpha 8 AI 4K Gen7 processor efficiently upscales lower-resolution content, and regardless of source you can also easily disable overscan. The TV also copes well with compression artefacts. The "Smooth Gradation" feature can effectively reduce visible banding and tonal unevenness, but it is not always precise. At higher settings it can also smooth out fine details, for example surface textures. On the plus side, it does not remove film grain. It's safest to use the "Low" or "Medium" setting, which gives the best compromise between artefact reduction and preserving detail.

In terms of posterisation reduction itself, Samsung has kept the solutions known from last year’s models. The dedicated gradient-smoothing function performs quite well and can effectively mask unwanted tonal banding, which is useful on a WOLED panel that is slightly more prone to banding. However, you should be aware of its aggressive behaviour. This mechanism, alongside the artefacts themselves, can clean up fine film grain and gently soften detail. Ultimately it is a matter of compromise, but if you want an absolutely faithful reproduction, it is safer to leave this option off.

Similarly, in the area of scaling it is difficult to call this a breakthrough. The S90H uses the same NQ4 Gen3 processor as its predecessor, so the upscaling quality was almost identical. The chip sharpens lower-resolution material very well, extracting a satisfying level of detail. Samsung still has not dealt with the longstanding overscan issue, though. With some older recordings or archive footage the edges of the image can be slightly cropped. It’s a minor flaw, but it’s a pity the manufacturer still hasn’t eliminated it.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.3/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
63%
50%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (4K@165Hz ):

The LG MRGB85 is equipped with a VA panel with a native 144 Hz refresh rate, so it performs very well in terms of motion handling. The TV easily handles 120 Hz content from consoles and higher refresh rates when connected to a PC. That matters not only for gaming but also when watching sport, where camera movement is noticeably smoother than on basic models with 60 Hz panels. We also have TruMotion, which lets you set the level of motion smoothing yourself. You can keep a more cinematic feel to motion or increase smoothness, which works well for sports broadcasts and TV programmes. The adjustment range is wide, so you can easily tailor the smoothing to your own preferences.

In terms of motion handling, the S90H is simply excellent. This year's panel offers a boosted refresh rate of up to 165 Hz, though in practice the benefit will mainly be for gamers connecting a high-end PC. For films, series or sports broadcasts such a high refresh rate makes no difference and the picture looks exactly the same as at the standard 120 Hz. Regardless of the source, however, the OLED panel's lightning-fast response time does its job, so motion is clean and the ghosting or smearing familiar from LCD screens simply does not occur here.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

9.6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

When it comes to gaming, the LG MRGB85 performs by far the best. The manufacturer didn't skimp on features and has essentially brought the full suite of functions from pricier TVs to this model. You get three HDMI 2.1 ports with the full 48 Gbit/s bandwidth. Each supports 4K at 120 Hz from a console, and when connected to a PC also 4K at 144 Hz. So you don't need to worry which port to plug your console or PC into, because they all offer the same capabilities. Also on board are VRR, AMD FreeSync Premium, NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible, ALLM and HGiG. There's also Dolby Vision Gaming, which means in supported games you can use high refresh rates and dynamic HDR simultaneously on Xbox. The package is rounded off by Game Optimizer, a handy in-game menu for gamers. Without leaving the game you can change the picture profile, brighten shadow details or check the current frame rate. In terms of gaming features, the MRGB85 therefore offers almost the same as much more expensive LG models.

Players should feel at home with the S90H, because Samsung has left few reasons to complain in that respect. The TV has four HDMI 2.1 ports, each of which supports VRR, ALLM and high refresh rates. There’s also the Game Bar, a handy menu that lets you quickly check key parameters and change settings without leaving the game. Importantly, Samsung has also improved HGiG mode. In last year’s models it could cause problems when used with a console, but on the S90H it now works as it should. What really stands out against the competition is the Game Motion Plus feature. It’s a special motion smoothing mode for games that works best with titles running at 30 or 60 fps. Motion becomes noticeably smoother, while latency remains at a reasonable level. In our measurements it was under 50 ms, so gaming is still comfortable. That’s important, because on many TVs enabling a similar smoothing feature causes such a large increase in input lag that controls become noticeably sluggish. Samsung has managed to find a good compromise here. There’s still no Dolby Vision Gaming, but in practice Game Motion Plus may prove to be a much more useful feature.

Input lag

9.7/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
19 ms
10 ms
1080p120
10 ms
6 ms
2160p60
18 ms
10 ms
2160p120
9 ms
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
18 ms
10 ms
2160p120
9 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
21 ms
2160p120 DV
9 ms

Input lag in the LG MRGB85 is really low. Our measured value was around 10 ms with a 120 Hz signal and about 20 ms at 60 Hz. Importantly, we obtained similar results in Dolby Vision mode as well. They may not be the absolute best figures on the market, but in practice they are more than enough for comfortable, smooth gameplay. The delay is not noticeable and should not be a problem even in fast-paced action games or online titles.

Input lag is another area that's really hard to fault. With a 120 Hz signal we measured just around 5/6 ms, which is an absolutely superb result. When switching to even higher refresh rates the delay fell to almost astronomically low levels, practically imperceptible during gameplay. The Samsung S90H delivers truly class-leading results.

Compatibility with PC

8.4/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
9ms
6ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
RWGB
Max refresh rate
144Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

MRGB85 works very well with PCs. Support for 4K at 144 Hz and compatibility with G-Sync Compatible and FreeSync Premium mean it's not just a gaming screen but also a perfectly capable monitor for work. In terms of text readability, it's simply good. The TV properly supports 4:4:4 chroma, so small fonts and system elements remain sharp. Only when viewed from very close can you spot minor artefacts on the edges of letters, but at a normal distance from a 55" screen or larger it makes no difference at all.

The S90H performs very well as a large-format monitor for PC, and not just because of its full set of gaming features. NVIDIA G-Sync certification, low input lag and support for refresh rates up to 165 Hz mean it works smoothly with typical gaming PCs. In terms of motion and image sharpness in PC games, there is little to criticise. The picture is a little different during everyday office work, web browsing or text editing. Although fonts remain legible, the specific subpixel layout of the WOLED panel (with an additional white subpixel) can make itself felt. When sitting very close to the screen, letter edges and small interface elements may show slight coloured fringing or appear a little softened. This is a characteristic of WOLED panels. In practice, however, it is not a major problem. We tested the 65-inch variant, which is naturally used at a distance of around a metre or more. From that distance the effect effectively disappears and does not interfere with daily work. It may be more noticeable in the smallest sizes, such as 42 or 48 inches, which are often placed on a desk and used at distances of only a few dozen centimetres.

Viewing angles

3.4/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
71%
31%

Viewing angles on the LG MRGB85 are mediocre. Because it uses a VA panel the image loses colour saturation quite quickly, even when viewed from a slight angle. This is a typical trait of this type of panel — in return for high contrast you get poorer viewing angles. IPS panels work the opposite way: they offer lower contrast but retain colours better when the screen is viewed from the side. In theory the MRGB85 belongs to the family of RGB TVs, which can have better viewing angles than models that use additional QLED filters. Here, however, that does not provide much advantage. The modest number of zones located at the edge of the screen and the way they operate mean that, when viewed from an angle, the image quickly loses quality much like on ordinary LCD panels.

The viewing angles on the Samsung S90H are very good and among the best on the market. That's due to the OLED panel, which, when viewed from the side, does not lose brightness or colour saturation as quickly as many LCD TVs. The picture therefore keeps its proper appearance for longer, which matters especially when watching TV in a larger group and not everyone is sitting directly in front of the screen. Only at very large viewing angles can you notice the advantage of QD-OLED panels. In their case the viewing angles are practically perfect, whereas in the WOLED version the colours and brightness begin to change slightly.

Daytime performance

6.1/10

6.5/10

Panel finish
Satin
Matte
Reflection suppression
Decent
Very Good
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Samsung S90H (WOLED): 473 cd/m2

LG MRGB85B: 515 cd/m2

LG MRGB85 copes quite well in a bright room. Its average brightness reaches around 500 nits, noticeably above average. That means in a moderately sunlit living room the picture remains clear and doesn’t look dim. The screen coating is less effective and only average at reducing reflections. Direct reflections from windows or lamps can be clearly visible, so it’s best not to place the TV directly opposite large windows or strong light sources.

There is, however, one area where the S90H with a WOLED panel performs better than the QD-OLED version. It concerns viewing in a heavily sunlit room. Thanks to the presence of a conventional polariser, blacks do not shift as much towards grey or a dark cherry tint as they do in QD-OLED panels. Combined with the new matt coating, this delivers very good results. Even in strong light the image retains more depth and the colours do not lose their vibrancy so quickly. That does not mean the screen remains completely black in all conditions. Under very strong lighting you can notice a faint purple tint, typical of WOLED panels. In the S90H it is partially suppressed by the matt coating and is not as obvious.

Ultimately both variants perform similarly in this category. WOLED handles maintaining black levels in a bright room better, but on the other hand it achieves slightly lower brightness in SDR. At times the difference versus the QD-OLED version may reach around 150 nits.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED PFS LED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
43.11.79
T-RSMHDEUC-0100-120 4.3, E4601200, BT - G. albo 1204
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review LG MRGB85B TV Panel details
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV Panel details

LG MRGB85B

Samsung S90H (WOLED)

TV features

7.7/10

7.3/10

  • System
    WebOS
    Tizen
  • System performance
    Very good
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 3 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    No
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review LG MRGB85B TV features
Review LG MRGB85B TV features
Review LG MRGB85B TV features
Review LG MRGB85B TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Atmos Flex Connect
    Bluetooth, Atmos Flex Connect

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

The LG MRGB85 runs webOS, which is fast, clear and provides access to all the major streaming apps. The menu is smooth and navigating it is straightforward. The TV also performs well with conventional broadcast TV. You’ll find features such as Time Shift, HbbTV and a convenient programme guide. The MRGB85 is therefore suitable both for using Netflix or YouTube and for everyday TV viewing.

Control is handled by a newer version of the Magic Remote. Compared with older models it has been noticeably slimmed down and no longer has a conventional numeric keypad, but it fits better in the hand and is more comfortable for daily use. It still retains the distinctive gyroscope, which lets you control the on-screen cursor by moving your hand. Combined with webOS, this works very well.

Classic television

When it comes to ordinary cable or terrestrial TV, Samsung offers no revolutions compared with last year’s model. Discounting the marketing AI features, you simply get a solid, traditional package: a full set of tuners, a CI slot for a decryption card, teletext and a convenient RF remote that doesn’t need to be pointed directly at the screen. The problem is that the market competition offers exactly the same today, and the S90H adds nothing in this area. What’s more, the S90 series has dropped the PIP function, that is picture-in-picture. If you liked to keep an eye on the news in the corner of the screen while watching another programme, unfortunately you can’t do that here.

Smart TV: Tizen

While there’s little that’s new for traditional TV, Tizen in its 2026 version performs really well. The main point is that the system runs incredibly smoothly and responds to commands without unnecessary hesitation. Any stutters in animations or lag when navigating the menus have gone. Although it’s Samsung’s proprietary platform rather than the Google TV many dislike, the app base is complete, and you’ll find absolutely all the major VOD services. Cloud gaming fans will also be pleased, because the gaming section has been significantly refined. For everyday Smart TV use, it’s an exceptionally fast and mature environment.

Apps

9.1/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player handles most common video, music and photo formats, so for everyday use you shouldn't be missing anything. The only unusual issue occurred with HEIC files. The TV correctly displayed their thumbnails, but when opened it couldn't show the image at full resolution. Aside from that, the player worked without any major issues.

The built-in media player handles most popular video, audio and image formats without any problems. The range of supported files is wide enough that the inability to install external apps such as VLC is not an issue at all. However, we encountered one serious bug when trying to open HEIC photos from an iPhone. Not only did the TV fail to display the files, it caused Tizen to freeze completely. The system stopped responding to the remote and we had to unplug the TV from the mains. This is a clear software bug that Samsung should patch as soon as possible in the next firmware update.

Sound

6.4/10

8.4/10

  • Maximum volume
    86dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The sound in the LG MRGB85 is simply adequate and there’s not much more to say about it. The 2.0 system used here, with a total power of 20 W, performs like most TVs on the market. It lacks pronounced bass and a wider soundstage, although it must be admitted it can get fairly loud. For everyday TV viewing this setup will do. However, those who want fuller, more impressive sound should consider purchasing a soundbar or a home cinema system.

The audio specification in the S90 series has, in theory, remained unchanged for several years. We still get a 2.1 system with a total power of 40 W, so before testing we assumed any noticeably better sound would be limited mainly to the largest variants. Yet the 65-inch model we tested sounded noticeably better than its predecessors. The sound is fuller, more dynamic and has more 'weight' than the dry specifications would suggest. We don't know whether Samsung changed the actual speakers or whether the improvement is mainly down to better tuning and software optimisation, but the effect is audible from the first moments. For such a slim S90H, it performs very well and for many people may be sufficient even without a soundbar. The only real complaint is the lack of DTS:X support, which, unfortunately, is increasingly being dropped from televisions. It does, however, support Dolby Atmos, so users of streaming services are unlikely to notice a major problem. The main disappointment will be for people who use Blu-ray discs, where DTS tracks still appear fairly often.

* In the test we used the S90H variant. Also available for sale is the S92H model, equipped with two additional 20 W drivers. That gives a 2.1.2 configuration with a total power of 60 W, so you can expect stronger and more spacious sound. We cannot confirm this, however, as we did not have the opportunity to test that version.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

86dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy