LG 55 B4 vs Samsung Q7F

Direct compare

B46 / B42 / B43

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”77”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.1

5.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    8.1

    5.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.8

    5.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.6

    5.3

  • Gaming on console

    9.3

    6.3

  • TV as a computer monitor

    7.6

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    5.7

    3.9

  • Utility functions

    8.9

    6.6

  • Apps

    9.1

    8.7

  • Sound quality

    7.1

    5.8

Advantages

  • Reference colour mapping after calibration

  • Very good image compliance with the director's intentions

  • Excellent compatibility with consoles and PCs

  • Advanced motion smoothing system

  • Deep and vivid image

  • Advanced WebOs system and "mouse" remote control

  • Solid native contrast (VA Panel)

  • Vivid colours thanks to QLED filter

  • Low input lag (around 10ms)

  • Advanced and smooth Tizen operating system

  • Compact sleek design with Type-C charging

Disadvantages

No like
  • Visible tonal transitions

  • Very low brightness (only 250 nits in HDR)

  • Lack of many features for gamers including VRR and HGiG – the manufacturer promised something, but in the end, those features are simply not available

  • Lack of many classic "television" features e.g. recording to USB or PIP

  • No Dolby Vision

  • Average quality of digital image processing

Our verdict

LG OLED B4 is an exceptionally versatile device in the semi-premium category. For how else could one describe an OLED television that is so well-priced, and whose price, as history shows, will quickly fall? Ideal blacks and contrast are two things that inevitably mesmerise, and we are certain that anyone who has owned a device with this panel will not be able to return to LCD units. The brightness results of the television in HDR content may seem rather low; however, in this case, thanks to this particular panel, they will appear optically much higher. It is worth noting their stability and uniformity in practically every scene. In this case, a minor downside is the brightness of a full-frame shot filled with a large amount of white. However, we do not believe this to be a serious problem, as there are not many such instances anyway. The factory colour reproduction also deserves praise, which in our specimen is very decent, but one cannot help but remember how beneficial calibration has been for the image, allowing the director's intentions to be conveyed fully. LG B4 will be an excellent choice for all kinds of gamers, as well as sports enthusiasts. The former will certainly appreciate the rich support in the form of all the conveniences stemming from the HDMI 2.1 standard. Meanwhile, the latter will benefit from the advanced motion smoothing with multi-step adjustments. And lastly, one cannot overlook the convenience provided by the remote control with a built-in gyroscope, allowing it to function like a mouse. The WebOS system, which we will navigate, is extremely smooth and responsive. It offers a multitude of applications, which will be more than sufficient for the vast majority of users. The heart of the LG B4 television is the advanced Alpha processor, responsible for the smoothness of the image and advanced signal analysis. In summary: who is the LG OLED B4 for? It is the perfect device for those expecting the highest possible image quality within a given budget, but not only that. The LG B4 stands out significantly above its competition at this price point, which cannot offer such high-quality images.

The Samsung Q7F is the manufacturer's cheapest model from the QLED line, and it must be admitted that a few advantages can easily be specified here. After calibration, the colours look really good, and the additional QLED filter makes the hues more saturated than in typical budget LCD televisions. Additionally, it features a VA panel that offers quite decent native contrast. It is certainly not at the level of top-tier models, but it performs adequately for everyday viewing. However, the biggest plus is the Tizen system, which is Samsung's flagship offering. It operates smoothly, is feature-rich, provides access to a multitude of applications and add-ons, and at the same time allows for straightforward connection of the television to the SmartThings ecosystem and control of other devices in the home. And basically, this is where the list of advantages ends, as the longer you use the Q7F, the more apparent it becomes that this is a product that is significantly underdeveloped. It's not just about the panel itself with its low brightness and mediocre picture quality in HDR films, but also about the lack of features that typically worked flawlessly in Samsung models. The manufacturer claims the presence of VRR and HGiG, but in practice, they offer no benefit, making it difficult to recommend this television even to casual gamers. It also does not perform particularly well for regular television as the digital image processing is at best average, and the tone transition enhancement feature, which usually worked excellently in Samsung models, hardly functions here. The Q7F is a piece of equipment that can only be recommended to those looking for a television with two phrases on the box: “QLED” and “good Smart TV”. Everyone else receives a rather bland product that falls significantly short of competing even with other more budget-friendly options. It’s a pity because usually, the word "QLED" in Samsung meant something more than just an ordinary television.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Stand type
stand-type-Black
stand-type-Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Height adjustment, Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

4.7/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review LG 55 B4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG 55 B4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG 55 B4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG 55 B4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG 55 B4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,850:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,300:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,050:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

LG B4 uses OLED panels produced by LG Displays. The use of this type of panel provides us with perfect contrast and black levels. With such conditions, the picture is incredibly vivid and one might even get the impression that it is three-dimensional. The series of the manufacturer with the letter "B" has always been an ideal solution for those seeking very good picture quality while not wanting to pay extra for features that are only available in higher series. Therefore, these models have become something of a dark horse in this price range, as their advantageous pricing primarily competes with Mini LED televisions. It is not difficult to say that these models have won these battles due to the absence of characteristic flaws associated with LCD receivers with multi-zone backlighting, such as blooming/halo effects or dimming of images containing fine bright details. And as we can see in the test scenes from the films "Oblivion" and "Sicario 2," the fidelity is at the highest level. Looking at the first one, we see a spectacular play of lights that, despite their brightness, are perfectly separated from one another. Even a more challenging scene with a helicopter poses no problem for LG B4, showcasing a wealth of details and a unique colour grading specific to this title.

The Samsung Q7F in the tested size of 55 inches has a VA panel, which immediately translates to decent native contrast. Values around 3000:1 may not be record-breaking, as we know that panels with more than double the contrast are currently being produced, but it still performs much better than IPS or ADS panels, where black quickly fades into shades of grey or navy blue. Unfortunately, we do not find typical local dimming zones here, but the manufacturer has included something akin to global dimming – that is, dimming the entire screen in relation to the content. The effect? In most scenes, black appears rather solid, although during night viewing sessions, we will still see that it more closely resembles dark navy or grey than true pitch black. Overall, it's okay, but without fireworks – it's not spectacular, but it's also not a disaster.

HDR effect quality

6.3/10

3.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 99.0%, Bt.2020: 75.0%
DCI P3: 92.4%, Bt.2020: 69.2%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review LG 55 B4 Brightness measurement

Result

664 nit

Review LG 55 B4 Brightness measurement

Result

650 nit

Review LG 55 B4 Brightness measurement

Result

677 nit

Review LG 55 B4 Brightness measurement

Result

662 nit

Review LG 55 B4 Brightness measurement

Result

410 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

215 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

225 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

267 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

113 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: HDR10+

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung Q7F

HDR luminance

LG 55 B4

HDR luminance

Luminance of RGB colors

The brightness results in HDR materials for LG B4 are very good. It is true that none of them exceed 1000 nits, although the stability of luminance is excellent and looks practically the same in every scenario. The only moment where the tested television performs worse is the last of the scenes, although this should not be surprising. Large frames filled with a lot of white have always been, and probably will continue to be, somewhat of a weakness for OLED televisions. However, the combination of perfect contrast, black levels, and brightness of LG B4 allows for a full experience of the HDR effect. Additionally, the incredibly high coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut deserves recognition, reaching 99%. This makes the colours look incredibly vivid and striking.

Unfortunately, the Samsung Q7F is not one of the brighter televisions, and this has a direct impact on the quality of HDR films. The peak brightness of the panel is just around 250 nits, which is definitely too low to speak of true cinematic experiences. In practice, the image in HDR content does not differ significantly from classic SDR, making it difficult to talk about any "wow effect" that usually accompanies us when watching such films. During tests of film scenes, the image simply looked dark, and the brightness almost always hovered around the aforementioned 250 nits. The worst performances were with shots that included small, intensely shining elements – the global dimming technique used reacted very aggressively in these cases, dimming the entire screen to maintain the effect of black. However, it is worth noting the presence of the QLED coating that expands the colour palette. For a budget QLED model, the Q7F performs quite decently here: the coverage of the DCI-P3 palette is about 93%, and BT.2020 reaches 70%. This means that, despite the low brightness, the colours can still look quite vivid and attractive.

Factory color reproduction

8.4/10

5/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode prepared by the manufacturer is "Filmmaker," which is exactly what we used throughout the entire testing procedure. We must admit that the unit we received out of the box had quite good colour reproduction. The biggest problem in both SDR and HDR content turned out to be white balance. In the former, a strong red hue was evident, causing the displayed image to have a pronounced yellow tint, particularly noticeable on skin tones and whites. In higher quality materials, this colour was also accentuated, but due to a lack of blue, there were also signs of green visible. Apart from these issues, we also encountered problems with grayscale and the colours themselves.

The factory colour accuracy of the Samsung Q7F is certainly not one of its strong points. In Filmmaker mode, which theoretically should be the closest to neutral, the issue with white balance immediately stands out. There is too much red on the screen, while blue is lacking. The consequences of this are very easy to notice – white, instead of being neutral, takes on warm, almost slightly orange tones. In the long run, this makes the entire image look somewhat unnatural, and bright areas of the scene may seem unrealistic. The problems become even more evident in HDR content. The graphs show that the television has significant errors in the Color Checker palette, which translates to visible inaccuracies in the actual image. Practically, this means that the colours are not presented as they should be. The Q7F also heavily manipulates brightness; darker elements are overly boosted, losing their cinematic quality, while bright parts may appear dimmed. As a result, the image seems flattened, and contrast, instead of helping to bring out details, only highlights its own limitations. This is particularly frustrating in HDR material, where every detail matters. In scenes where there should be a subtle play of light and shadow, the Q7F either oversteps by brightening too much or conversely – suppresses elements that should draw the eye. This causes the image to lose its depth, and instead of cinematic realism, we have a rather simplified effect.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.3/10

7.6/10

LG B4 has been providing very advanced calibration tools in its televisions for years. We can even say that as the only manufacturer on the market, it allows for such deep intervention in image adjustment. It is thanks to these tools that we were able to calibrate the device so well. Evidence of this is the extremely low deltaE errors, which can be said to be at a reference level. Both SDR and HDR materials now look exactly as intended by the film director. It is no coincidence that televisions of this brand are most often used as preview screens for various graphic or post-production studios.

After professional calibration, we managed to bring the Q7F into order – at least in terms of SDR content. The picture in this mode looks really good: the white balance has been set correctly, the colours appear natural, and errors in the colour palette have dropped to levels that are practically invisible to the eye. Gamma behaves exemplary, and the only minor drawback is a slight lightening of smaller elements, which results from the lack of local dimming. For everyday watching of television or films in standard quality, the Q7F performs surprisingly well.

It was significantly harder to tame HDR content. Despite adjusting the white balance, the television still heavily manipulates brightness, causing scenes to sometimes look unnatural – what should be subtly darker can be overly brightened, and bright areas of the picture can occasionally appear dimmed. The end result is better than in factory settings, but it is evident that the structural limitations of the Q7F do not allow for the full potential of HDR materials to be fully realised.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.4/10

9/10

The fluidity of tonal transitions, often overlooked in various tests on competing portals, is an equally important aspect of image quality assessment. It is particularly important when watching material that features a wealth of colours and many intricate effects, where textures blend. This often leads to the so-called banding of colours, which is a lack of smooth gradation. The tested television handles tonal transition smoothing quite well. However, it is worth noting that it has its weaker moments, such as a bright coloured sky in the film "Kingsman" or "The Martian". Nevertheless, these are not aspects that detract from the viewing pleasure. Therefore, we positively assess the quality of tonal transitions in LG B4.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the Q7F is really quite good. The gradients are smooth, without strong stair-stepping or artificial divisions that can be quite noticeable in cheaper televisions. Even in more challenging scenes, such as the one from The Revenant or the red shot with the actor swimming in water, the image maintained quality and simply looked good. If someone were to look very closely, they might notice slight imperfections in extremely demanding moments, but they are subtle enough that most people won't even notice them. For this price range, the Q7F performs surprisingly solidly in terms of gradation, and it's hard to find anything significant to criticise.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.9/10

4.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

In this paragraph, we will take another look at the function for smoothing tonal transitions, but we will also check how the television handles lower quality material. As we have managed to verify, the setting responsible for smooth gradation works quite efficiently, although it has its weaker moments. Just as the function works correctly in SDR content, it becomes rather useless in HDR content. Even at the lowest of the options, it blurs essential details, which is why we advise against using it.

The image scaling on LG B4 is rated rather moderately positively. Although there is no edge doubling, the image itself is naturally "soft." We can change this by adjusting the sharpness slider.

Upscaling and digital image processing on the Q7F is a bit of a sine wave. On one hand, we have really nice upscaling – weaker sources look better than one might expect. The image becomes clearer, sharper, and even older films or terrestrial television perform adequately. Samsung has been strong in this area for years, and the Q7F confirms that. On the other hand… there are some issues. The television has a problem with overscan – part of the image is simply cut off, and it doesn't look very elegant. Additionally, we were let down by a feature called "noise reduction", which should improve the smoothness of tonal transitions in weaker materials. In other Samsungs, it works relatively well, but here it makes practically no difference – the banding in gradients is still there. It's a bit of a shame, as one could have expected more from a model that is aimed at users looking for a display for SDR content.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

5.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
120Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 120Hz
-
Brightness drop with BFI
49%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

The maximum refresh rate that we can set on the LG B4 is 120 Hz. This is the absolute minimum for those requiring high image fluidity. The manufacturer has implemented a multi-step motion smoother called "TruMotion". It has been divided into two separate sliders adjusting the sharpness of moving images (De-Blur) and jitter (De-Judder). Both sliders can be set in the range from 0 to 10, with each degree affecting the level of fluidity, so everyone can find their golden mean.

The LG OLED B4 panel features an average response time of 0.1 ms (which directly results from our measurements), allowing for an incredibly clear image, unattainable for LCD televisions, whose response times can be as high as several milliseconds. This is clearly evident in the pictures from the "UFO Test", showing no trail following the object.

Ghosting and motion smoothness in the Q7F are probably the most budget-friendly elements of this television. The 60 Hz panel makes itself known, with noticeable ghosting, especially in dynamic scenes, and it's rather difficult to regard this model as equipment designed for watching sports or playing fast-paced games. In tests with the little green man, a long trail was left behind, similarly to how a ball in a football match would leave streaks.

On the plus side, the presence of motion smoothing must be acknowledged. In films, it actually makes a difference – especially since most material is recorded at 24 frames per second. Here we can decide whether we prefer a more "cinematic" image, with slight judder typical of cinema, or a smoother, more "television" approach. This part works quite well and helps to improve the viewing experience for series and films.

Console compatibility and gaming features

10/10

3.3/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    40 - 120Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The LG B4 television is equipped with four fully-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports with a full bandwidth of 48Gbps. All features that are identical to this standard were activated without any issues, and throughout the entire testing process, they did not cause any problems. The combination of such extensive functionality and low input lag suggests that the tested television is truly made for gaming. This is not surprising, considering that the manufacturer has always placed great emphasis on this. Therefore, we can enjoy both the properly implemented HGIG mode and gaming in Dolby Vision with low latency. This pairing will certainly attract the attention of all passionate gamers for whom quality is paramount.

An additional standard in televisions from this Korean manufacturer is the implementation of GameBar, allowing for quick adjustment of settings "on the fly," without the need to exit the game. It also enables image adjustments for individuals with visual impairments, which is a very nice touch. Another important piece of information is that when VRR technology is enabled, we will not experience a drop in contrast. This is thanks to the construction of the panel and the lack of conventional backlighting. However, it is normal for shades of grey to flicker slightly; nevertheless, this is a characteristic feature of this function regardless of the manufacturer or television.

In summary: the LG B4, like all of the manufacturer’s OLEDs equipped with 120Hz panels and HDMI 2.1 ports, creates a harmonious whole with the console. In practice, this is a comprehensive television, and if we expect the highest possible efficiency in gaming, B4 will be the ideal choice.

Features for gamers in the Samsung Q7F is a topic that evokes quite a lot of mixed feelings. On the one hand – no sensible person expected miracles here, as it is after all a 60 Hz television and it was clear from the start that it would not be a device for squeezing the maximum out of a console or PC. On the other hand, since the manufacturer promised specific solutions in promotional materials, it is natural that we wanted to see them in practice. At the outset, it’s quite decent. The automatic game mode (ALLM) works, so there’s no need to manually fiddle with the settings; the console automatically switches the television to low-latency mode. Additionally, we have the Game Bar, which looks impressive and allows you to check a few basic parameters without leaving the game. And this is where the good news ends.

The biggest problem with the Q7F is VRR, or rather its absence. Yes, an appropriate icon appears in the menu, and you can even see it in the Game Bar, but throughout the entire test, the feature remained inactive and could not be enabled in any way. The situation with HGiG is even more painful; this option was indeed available at the beginning, but after a software update, it completely vanished, which is simply unprofessional. Therefore, the Q7F is only suited for the absolute basics. Of course, you can turn on the console, play some calmer titles, and enjoy low input lag, but if someone is counting on more advanced features that the manufacturer promised, they will be disappointed. This is not a television to buy with gaming in mind, and it's better to be aware of that before making a purchase.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
13 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
13 ms
13 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

Input lag for the LG B4 is at an incredibly low level in every scenario. Even the most dedicated gamers will certainly appreciate the very low input lag at demanding 4K 120 Hz settings with HDR, which is just 5 ms. It is also worth noting that the lag at these same settings, but with Dolby Vision HDR enabled, remains consistent, which is not as evident with the competition. Therefore, it deserves the highest rating and recommendation.

Input lag on the Samsung Q7F is really good for a television with a 60 Hz panel. Measurements showed values below 12 ms, which means that for regular gaming on a console, this model is more than sufficient. Of course, it is not on the level of high-end 120 Hz screens, which can go as low as 6–7 ms, but in everyday practice, it is hard to talk about noticeable delay. In this respect, the Q7F does not fall behind its competitors in its segment and can easily be considered a safe choice for casual or sports gaming. At least in this regard.

Compatibility with PC

7.6/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
5ms
13ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RWBG
BGR
Max refresh rate
120Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

LG B4 combined with a PC performs excellently, thanks to a very low latency of just 13.5 ms, which is practically an instant response between the mouse, the eye, and the screen. An extremely important factor when working on a screen is primarily the readability of the text, which in the case of the tested television is very good. However, it is worth noting that to achieve sharp fonts, one must enable the passthrough option in the settings.

The RWBG pixel layout has no significant impact on the display of fonts or letters, which provides a considerable advantage over Samsung's QD-OLED matrices. Users of both Windows and macOS equipped computers are sure to be pleased with the performance on the screen of the tested television.

Collaboration with a PC on the Q7F is decent, although it is not a television that will satisfy the most demanding users. Fonts are displayed clearly and sharply, so it is perfectly fine to work on it – especially for daily office tasks or browsing the internet. With thin letters, one can notice slight shadowing, but it is not something that interferes with normal use. In a smaller size, the Q7F can indeed work as a computer screen, although one must remember its limitations. The lack of variable refresh rate means we cannot use G-Sync or FreeSync, and 60 Hz practically closes the door to more demanding PC gaming. For work and light usage, it will be okay, but for serious gaming, it is definitely better to look for something higher in Samsung's offering.

Viewing angles

7.4/10

3.5/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
29%
78%

The undisputed advantage of OLED panels is their performance in the context of group viewing, that is, from various angles. LG B4 maintains very good contrast, colour saturation, and fidelity. Although this is not the result of organic televisions supported by MLA technology, one cannot say that anyone who purchased the device was dissatisfied with the results obtained. However, it should be noted that at sharp angles, a slight greenish tint can be observed. This is a characteristic feature of LG's WRGB panels, without the aforementioned micro-lens technology, and unfortunately, there is nothing that can be done about it.

The viewing angles on the Q7F are simply poor – typical for a VA panel. Just sitting slightly to the side immediately shows that the image loses quality. Colours fade, contrast clearly drops, and blacks start to resemble grey more than anything deep. This is a television that is definitely best viewed head-on, and any wider viewing angle comes with compromises.

TV efficiency during daytime

5.7/10

3.9/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Samsung Q7F: 237 cd/m2

LG 55 B4: 374 cd/m2

The maximum brightness of the television in SDR materials is 370 nits. For an OLED television, this is a very good result and allows for quite comfortable viewing during the day. It is worth paying attention to two things. The first is the rather mediocre handling of reflections caused by the satin finish of the panel, which means that direct light hitting the television will be quite obtrusive. The second issue is the brightness of the screen when filled 100% with white, oscillating around 260 nits, which is an excellent result, as until recently, OLED televisions in this price range could "boast" a brightness twice as low. Thanks to this, the conditions for watching, for example, winter sports will be very good.

The performance of the Q7F during the day unfortunately does not impress. Due to its low brightness, the screen quickly capitulates in very sunny rooms. It is therefore hard to recommend it to those who plan to watch television in a bright living room with large windows. In moderately lit rooms, it still performs adequately, but in bright light, the picture loses clarity. Additionally, the fact that the panel does not always effectively handle glare means reflections can be distracting during the day. This is more of a screen for evening viewing rather than for daily sessions in full sunlight.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
QLED
Software version during testing
03.11.10
T-RSLFDEUC-0090-1110.7, E2500007, BT-S
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

LG 55 B4

Samsung Q7F

TV features

8.9/10

6.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

LG B4 uses the well-known proprietary system WebOS. The system offers practically all the most important applications, and those that are lacking can be counted on one hand, such as CDA or KODI.

WebOS also boasts a highly appreciated ability to perform operations using a cursor that appears when the remote control is moved. The convenience of such a feature is invaluable when entering queries or passwords for portals. WebOS, like most systems, also supports functions such as screen mirroring, AirPlay, voice search in Polish, and the capability to connect headphones via Bluetooth. On a more practical note, WebOS allows us to use both headphones and the television speaker simultaneously, which will certainly be a great help for those with hearing impairments. Among the more interesting features, particularly appreciated by sports fans, is the option to enable an alert for upcoming matches, ensuring that we never miss a broadcast. The home panel also deserves praise for allowing control of all smart devices connected to the home network. For example, the end of a washing cycle will be signalled by a notification in the top right corner.

In summary, the WebOS system, despite being less known and having certain limitations compared to Android TV, offers stable and fast operation and supports most functions that users may need. It is a solid solution for those looking for a simple and effective operating system in a television.

Smart TV – Tizen System

Here Q7F shows its strongest side. Samsung has been developing the Tizen system for years, and it is evident that we are dealing with a mature, well-refined platform. Everything runs smoothly, the menu does not lag even when switching between heavier applications, and installing additional programmes from the library is quick and hassle-free. In addition, there is full support for AirPlay, integration with voice assistants, as well as a wide range of add-ons – from cooperation with devices in the SmartThings ecosystem to the ability to control Philips Hue smart lighting or other smart gadgets. Samsung strongly focuses on advanced networking features, and this is evident – in terms of Smart TV, the Q7F has absolutely nothing to be ashamed of, and on the contrary, it can embarrass more expensive competitors.

Classic Features

On the side of classic, “television” solutions, it is clear that the manufacturer has bet everything on the smart card. We will not find any USB recording or PiP mode here, which used to be standard features. It is evident that the Q7F is meant to be primarily a multimedia centre, rather than a device for those accustomed to more traditional solutions. Fortunately, several practical additions are not lacking – we have Bluetooth for pairing headphones or speakers, and the option to change the font size in the menu, which will be appreciated by users with weaker eyesight.

Playing files from USB

8.5/10

9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
No
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
No
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The default file player in LG B4 definitely handles most images well, although the absence of a few equally popular formats is surprising. We can successfully play videos recorded in virtually all the most popular formats, including Dolby Vision. The only codec that LG B4 will not play is H.266 VVC, although this is currently rather unused. However, it is worth noting the supported image formats, of which there are only two: JPEG and PNG. Users of Apple devices may feel disappointed by the lack of support for the HEIC format, which is the default format when taking photos. The remedy for this is to use the built-in AirPlay feature. We will also mention the lack of support for TXT subtitles.

In the Q7F we have a built-in file player, and as is usually the case with Samsung televisions, it works quite well – most popular films or music will play without fuss. For basic use, it is sufficient, and there is no real need to reach for external solutions like connecting a laptop. It is worse if someone wants to upload photos – here it can lag, especially with Apple's HEIC or PNG, which are visible in the player menu but do not necessarily want to work.

Apps

9.1/10

8.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

7.1/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    80dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The audio system built into the LG OLED B4 can be considered quite good. We can say that it performs well for its price range. The bass is quite noticeable, but does not overpower the other frequencies. It can be said that the sound is fairly well balanced. We believe that those opting for this class of display are, or will be, in possession of an appropriate audio system. Therefore, the presence of DTS-HD Master Audio and Dolby Atmos codecs is not insignificant.

The Samsung Q7F comes with a 20 W speaker system and… well, let’s not kid ourselves, it’s nothing revolutionary. The television itself sounds quite decent, meaning we can clearly hear series, news, or daily programmes; dialogues do not get lost, but there’s a significant lack of depth and sound space. There is virtually no bass; it thuds somewhat, but it resembles more of a box being tapped rather than true low tones. Music comes across flat, and films don't make any significant impression – we won’t feel like we're in a cinema. It’s sound from the ‘acceptable’ category, just enough to have something built-in, but if someone is counting on a stronger experience, they will inevitably reach for a soundbar sooner or later. And to be honest – even the simplest model will make a considerable difference, and Samsung has quite a few in their offering.

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

80dBC (Max)

75dBC