Hisense UR8S vs Samsung R85H / R86H

Direct comparison

R85H / R86H / Micro RGB

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”100”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: VIDAA

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.2

7.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.4

    7.3

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.6

    7.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.4

    7.2

  • Gaming on console

    8.4

    8.9

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.5

    8.0

  • Watching in bright light

    9.5

    7.3

  • Utility functions

    9.4

    7.3

  • Apps

    8.3

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    7.8

    7.1

Advantages

  • Very high contrast and good black levels

  • High image brightness

  • Potentially wider colour gamut thanks to RGB backlighting

  • Excellent image processing and upscaling

  • Panel with a refresh rate of up to 180 Hz

  • Very good gaming performance

  • Good viewing angles for a Mini-LED LCD

  • Matt finish and excellent performance in daylight

  • Fast VIDAA and many user-focused features

  • Support for Dolby Vision, HDR10+, Dolby Atmos and DTS

- Good black levels and contrast, VA panel with local dimming - High HDR brightness, approx. 1000 nits - Very wide colour gamut and colour volume - Matte anti-reflective coating - 144 Hz / 240 Hz panel (DLG) - 4x HDMI 2.1 - Extensive gaming features (ALLM, VRR, low input lag, G-Sync) - Fast and functional Tizen system (7 years of support) - Good viewing angles (for a VA panel) - Adjustable stand width and height

Disadvantages

No like
  • The full potential of RGB Mini-LED is not always realised in films

  • HDR brightness can differ from the creators' vision

  • No proper HGiG implementation

  • The VIDAA system still lacks a few apps

  • Limited number of local dimming zones

  • RGB backlighting isn't always able to realise its full potential

  • Visible smearing on the VA panel

  • No Dolby Vision / DTS:X

Our verdict

Hisense UR8S is above all a very versatile high-end television that, in most uses, simply performs well or very well. It is not a model aimed solely at cinema, gaming or watching in a bright living room. Its greatest advantage is that it can combine all those things in a single set and it does not have any one clearly weak point. In terms of picture the UR8S has a lot to offer. Contrast is high, HDR can look very impressive, and its brightness is at a level that easily suffices for daytime viewing. Added to that are very good image processing and smooth motion handling. RGB Mini-LED also gives it a very wide colour gamut and it is clear that the technology has significant potential. However, it should be remembered that it does not completely change the character of an LCD television. In more demanding scenes the limitations of local dimming are still visible, and very high colour saturation cannot always be maintained to the same extent as on simple test patterns.

One of the UR8S's strongest points is its everyday usability. The television performs well with sports, is well suited to gaming, and the high brightness and matte finish make a big difference in a bright room. In addition the VIDAA system runs quickly, and Hisense has not removed many features that remain useful in everyday TV use. That is why we mainly see the UR8S as a television for people looking for a single, solid screen for everything. RGB Mini-LED is an interesting addition and provides some real benefits, but it is not the technology alone that makes this model perform well. Its main strength is that it is complete, well equipped and very versatile.

The Samsung R85H is, above all, a very versatile television that performs well in almost any use. You can place it in a bright living room, connect a console, watch a film or series in the evening, and use it for everyday broadcast TV, and each time you’ll get a picture of a good standard. It may not be a model that makes as strong an impression from the first minutes as Samsung’s best OLEDs, but it’s hard to point to a single feature that would significantly limit its use. That versatility is probably its greatest strength. Naturally, the most attention around the R85H goes to the new "Micro RGB" backlight. From our tests, we’d say it can indeed give some advantage over conventional Mini-LED, although not always in the areas the manufacturer emphasises most. On measurement charts its colour reproduction capabilities are impressive, but in real, more complex scenes the TV is not always able to exploit the full potential of the three-colour backlight. Its strength is most evident in simpler parts of the image, where intense reds, greens or blues can look really striking. Viewing angles are also a little better, as colours viewed at an angle retain their saturation longer than on classic LCD TVs. However, Micro RGB does not solve all the limitations of RGB technology. With very saturated elements you can sometimes notice slight colour bleeding onto neighbouring bright parts of the image, and a relatively small number of local dimming zones means the backlight cannot always operate as precisely as its on-paper capabilities would suggest. The R85H therefore shows that RGB genuinely has potential and could be the next step in the development of LCD televisions, but simply using coloured LEDs does not automatically deliver a huge jump in picture quality. For that reason we would treat the R85H primarily as a slightly better and more interesting alternative to the QN80H, rather than a TV you must buy at all costs just because it carries the Micro RGB badge. If the price difference between the models is reasonable, we would choose the R85H. We would not, however, pay a large premium solely for the new backlight, because its advantage in everyday viewing is not always as great as marketing materials might suggest. Regardless, the R85H is a successful all-purpose TV and that is probably the best way to view it.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment
Height adjustment, Base adjustment
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

8/10

7.9/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 936 (26 x 36)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 150 (10 x 15)

Contrast:

Review Hisense UR8S Contrast and black detail

Result

267,450:1

Review Hisense UR8S Contrast and black detail

Result

48,550:1

Review Hisense UR8S Contrast and black detail

Result

19,450:1

Review Hisense UR8S Contrast and black detail

Result

14,850:1

Review Hisense UR8S Contrast and black detail

Result

10,800:1

Review Samsung R85H / R86H Contrast and black detail

Result

182,800:1

Review Samsung R85H / R86H Contrast and black detail

Result

46,750:1

Review Samsung R85H / R86H Contrast and black detail

Result

22,450:1

Review Samsung R85H / R86H Contrast and black detail

Result

10,900:1

Review Samsung R85H / R86H Contrast and black detail

Result

9,050:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

We tested the Hisense UR8S in the 65-inch size, and this variant uses a VA panel, so native contrast is already at a very good level and reaches much higher values than those of IPS panels. The most important factor, however, is local dimming. Our unit had 936 zones, and you can clearly see that they can significantly help in dark scenes. For films where a large part of the screen is black, the UR8S performs very well. Black is deep, the black letterbox bars do not glow blue, and in some shots the effect can even slightly resemble OLED. Of course only slightly, because the difference is still visible. It is easiest to notice with small bright elements on a black background. Then a slight halo may appear around the object. It is not large and, during normal viewing, is unlikely to be very distracting, but it shows that this is still a TV with 936 zones, not a screen that can dim each pixel individually.

The Samsung R85H uses a Micro RGB backlight with local dimming and can perform very well in terms of blacks. In the 55-inch version we tested we counted about 150 zones, so it’s not on a par with the most advanced Mini-LEDs, where that number can run into the thousands. Even so, in many scenes the local dimming algorithm handles things quite effectively. With larger, clearly separated bright objects on a dark background the blacks are deep and the contrast can be very impressive. The halo effect is also reasonably well controlled, so during typical viewing the R85H does demonstrate the benefits of local dimming. The limitations of the small number of zones do show up with more demanding material, particularly when the screen contains many very small bright elements. A good example are scenes with starry skies. In such situations the TV can practically abandon local dimming, causing the black level to rise noticeably and the image to lose a large part of its contrast. Interestingly, we observed similar behaviour even when the bright points were already much fewer, so it appears to be more a quirk of how the algorithm works than solely a physical zone count. Overall, however, the R85H’s blacks are good. It’s not at the level of the most expensive Mini-LEDs with thousands of independently controlled zones, and in difficult scenes the difference is clear. In most material the local dimming nevertheless does its job and delivers significantly better blacks.

HDR effect quality

6/10

5.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 100.0%, Bt.2020: 94.6%
DCI P3: 96.9%, Bt.2020: 92.7%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Hisense UR8S Brightness measurement

Result

1241 nit

Review Hisense UR8S Brightness measurement

Result

269 nit

Review Hisense UR8S Brightness measurement

Result

594 nit

Review Hisense UR8S Brightness measurement

Result

188 nit

Review Hisense UR8S Brightness measurement

Result

1452 nit

Review Samsung R85H / R86H Brightness measurement

Result

860 nit

Review Samsung R85H / R86H Brightness measurement

Result

214 nit

Review Samsung R85H / R86H Brightness measurement

Result

758 nit

Review Samsung R85H / R86H Brightness measurement

Result

235 nit

Review Samsung R85H / R86H Brightness measurement

Result

912 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung R85H / R86H

Hisense UR8S

UR8S is a slightly higher-end Mini-LED, so you could expect a lot in terms of brightness. And indeed, on a synthetic test pattern peak brightness reached around 2200 nits. That’s a very good result, but as always what’s much more important is what the TV does in normal film scenes. Here the results are a bit more uneven. In bright scenes, where there’s a lot of light on screen, the UR8S can deliver really strong HDR. Brightness then reaches about 1500 nits, so the image is very intense and has plenty of punch. It’s worse with small bright elements on a dark background. The TV clearly dims them to keep good blacks and to prevent excessive bloom. As a result things like single stars or tiny reflections can be only around 200 nits. And here HDR is no longer as impressive. So you can see that the local dimming algorithm works effectively, but it also has its cost: sometimes it simply sacrifices the brightness of small details in favour of contrast.

Colours

With RGB Mini-LED TVs colours should be judged a little differently than usual. If we look solely at the panel’s native capabilities, the UR8S performs excellently. We measured around 94% coverage of BT.2020 and practically full DCI-P3. These are among the highest values currently found in LCD TVs and this is where the potential of the RGB backlight is most obvious. The problem is that this potential is not always realised in real scenes. When we ran the same measurements on test patterns with a film background applied, saturation of some colours began to fall noticeably. Individual zones are not always able to control the three RGB components so precisely when the scene becomes more complex. This is most visible with blue and magenta. On simple test patterns they can look very strong, but in more demanding scenes samples of those colours visibly shrink. So the UR8S’s capabilities are enormous, it’s just that the TV cannot fully make use of them in every scene.

When it comes to brightness, the R85H performs really respectably. In most of our test scenes the TV reaches around 800 to 900 nits, and with larger bright elements it can exceed 1000 nits. These are not, of course, levels on a par with the pricier Mini-LEDs, but they are more than enough for watching films and TV shows in HDR, and the effect can already be quite noticeable. The problem reappears in more demanding scenes where there is a small bright element on a very dark background. Here the TV can significantly limit its brightness so as not to light up too large a portion of the screen. In our measurements such small highlights fell even to around 200 to 250 nits, so it is clear that a small number of zones combined with the particular behaviour of the algorithm has consequences here. Fortunately, this is not something that disturbs viewing all the time. In typical mixed HDR scenes the R85H looks good and can deliver appropriate image dynamics. It's just that with very small points of light you shouldn't expect an effect as strong as on TVs with many more zones or on OLEDs.

Factory color reproduction

5.1/10

5.4/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

For assessing the out-of-the-box colours we used Filmmaker mode, which is intended to show an image that is as close as possible to how the material was prepared. Looking at the white balance alone, the UR8S performs quite well. There is no strong tint that immediately jumps out, although as brightness increases a little too much blue and red start to appear, with a simultaneous shortfall of green. Colour errors therefore show up in measurements, but the image itself does not look bad. We have far greater reservations about how the UR8S manages picture brightness. In SDR the gamma sits around 1.9–2.0 for most of the range instead of the target 2.4. In practice this simply means the picture is too bright, especially in the midtones. Shadows are lifted too much, causing the image to lose some depth. A similar tendency is visible in HDR. The EOTF curve is above the reference value for a large part of its range, so the UR8S again brightens the image more than it should. This is not due to a lack of brightness — the TV has plenty — but to the way it manages that brightness. As a result, HDR content can look very striking, but not always precisely as it should.

In Filmmaker mode our R85H sample performed acceptably in SDR, but a few things stood out immediately in the measurements. In the white balance red increased with rising brightness while blue decreased. As a result the brighter parts of the picture had a slightly too warm tint. Gamma only held to the target value at the start. It then gradually fell, which left most of the image a little too bright. The combination of these two effects also showed up in the colours, with errors growing particularly in the brighter and more saturated samples. It did not look bad, but for Filmmaker mode we had expected a bit more accuracy. Interestingly, in HDR our sample fared noticeably better. The white balance was much more even and, over most of the range, the individual components stayed close together. Only in the very brightest areas did red start to be lacking, causing white to shift subtly. The EOTF curve, by contrast, looked very good and followed the target luminance levels across almost the entire range. That does not mean HDR colours were perfect. The Colour Checker still showed some deviations, especially for some of the more saturated hues, but the errors were clearly smaller than in SDR.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

8.6/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Hisense provides plenty of calibration options and, in SDR, these can yield a very good result. After calibration, the white balance is practically even across the entire range, and colour errors fall to very low values. The UR8S can be adjusted very precisely here. HDR is somewhat different. The white balance itself can also be noticeably improved, although at the highest brightness levels larger deviations begin to appear. The most interesting aspect, however, is the behaviour of the EOTF curve. Even after it has been correctly set on test patterns, the UR8S still tends to interpret brightness in its own way when watching films. Depending on the scene, parts of the image are slightly brightened while others are dimmed relative to how they should appear. This shows that the algorithms controlling the local dimming have a significant influence on the final image. Calibration therefore allows colours to be improved very effectively, but we are not able to completely 'turn off' the way the UR8S manages brightness in HDR.

After calibration the R85H shows it has genuinely substantial capabilities in colour reproduction. It performed best in SDR, where the white balance could be brought almost perfectly into line and the gamma stays very close to the target value across most of the range. This also translated into very low errors on the Colour Checker, so there is really little to pick fault with. HDR also shows a clear improvement, although some things can no longer be corrected as well. At the highest brightness levels the character of the backlight begins to make itself felt and the individual components of the white balance start to drift apart. The same applies to the most saturated colours, which do not always land exactly where they should. Despite these limitations the overall image is much more accurate than with the factory settings, and the biggest difference is definitely seen in SDR. There is, however, one thing calibration cannot fix. With heavily saturated elements the colour can slightly bleed onto adjacent bright areas of the image. It is easiest to notice this on white, which can pick up a faint tint of a neighbouring colour. It does not appear in every scene, but when the material is demanding the effect can be visible. This is more a characteristic of the way the RGB backlight works than a matter of picture settings.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.3/10

8.9/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Tonal transitions on the UR8S are really very good. In most scenes colours shift between successive shades practically without any visible steps or banding. This applies to both darker and brighter parts of the image. Only in very extreme shades of grey can small imperfections be noticed. It looks a little worse in Dolby Vision. In the same scenes subtle banding is easier to notice, particularly in the darker parts of the image. It's still good, but because of that difference the rating is slightly lower.

Samsung R85H handles tonal transitions quite well, and during normal viewing this is not something that particularly draws attention. On bright gradients the transitions are mostly smooth, and only on closer inspection can slight steps between some brightness levels be noticed. These are not pronounced and do not noticeably affect the viewing experience. It is very similar in darker areas. Here you can also sometimes pick up small steps between similar shades, but there is no issue with heavy banding or obvious breaking up of gradients. Bright skies, fog and darker shadows are all displayed smoothly and without major problems.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

8/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

A big plus of the UR8S is the use of the MediaTek Pentonic 800 processor, and digital image processing is one of this model's stronger points. The TV handles smoothing tonal transitions very well, especially with lower-quality content. The feature responsible for this effect works effectively without overprocessing the picture. Even on the medium setting it can noticeably reduce visible banding and unevenness without heavily blurring details. Upscaling itself also performs very well. Lower-resolution content is displayed cleanly, edges look natural, and the image is not overly sharpened. The UR8S simply copes very well with a weaker signal, and in this respect it is one of its most notable strengths.

In the R85H image processing is handled by the Micro RGB AI Processor. The name is new, but when it comes to upscaling lower-quality material the TV’s behaviour is very similar to what Samsung has shown before. And that’s not a bad thing, because the manufacturer has dealt with this aspect quite well for years. Lower-resolution content is displayed cleanly, edges do not become excessively soft, and the TV does not try to artificially extract details at any cost. The result is simply well balanced, and with regular broadcasts or older recordings the R85H performs as you would expect from a Samsung in this class. There remains only a minor drawback in the form of overscan, which cannot be completely turned off at the lowest resolutions. A separate matter is the additional processing of weaker sources. The R85H can smooth posterisation and somewhat tidy up heavily compressed footage, but it is worth emphasising that it does this relatively aggressively. At stronger noise reduction settings it begins to remove not only compression artefacts but also fine details and the natural film grain. It is therefore best used only when the material truly needs it.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.8/10

7.4/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
180Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
69%
73%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (1080P@340Hz):

Blur (1080p@240Hz):

The UR8S is equipped with a panel with a native 180 Hz refresh rate, so right from the start it offers excellent motion handling. The panel itself performs really well here, although some limitations typical of VA panels are still visible. Motion blur is relatively minor for this type of screen, but with faster motion (especially on darker backgrounds) it can still be noticed, particularly when compared with the same image on OLED TVs.

The R85H has a 144 Hz panel, so motion is really smooth here. Just bear in mind that the extra hertz above 120 are mainly used when connected to a PC, so in this category we don't treat them as any particular advantage. For films and TV, what's more important is that the panel is fast enough to provide access to an advanced motion-smoothing feature, "Motion Clarity", which lets you set motion anywhere from more film-like to very smooth. The panel's response time is a bit worse. Because it's a VA panel, fast-moving objects can leave a slight trail. On bright backgrounds this isn't very noticeable, but the darker the scene, the more pronounced the smearing becomes. This is a typical trait of this type of panel and it's easiest to notice in dark shots.

Console compatibility and gaming features

8.5/10

9.6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 330Hz
    48 - 240Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

In terms of gamer features the UR8S performs really well. The TV supports practically everything you can expect from a modern console or PC display. It offers ALLM, VRR and 4K at 120 Hz. There is also Dolby Vision in Game Mode, so when using, for example, the Xbox Series X you do not have to give up that HDR format. PC gamers get even more options. The panel can run at 4K at 180 Hz, and dropping to Full HD can raise the refresh rate to as much as 330 Hz. There is also a Game Bar that lets you quickly check key information and change gaming-related settings. The only clear omission is a correct implementation of HGiG. With it enabled the TV still alters HDR brightness mapping, so we do not get the effect intended by that standard. Aside from that, the UR8S is very well prepared for both consoles and a powerful PC.

Samsung has been steadily expanding its gaming features for several years, and the R85H really doesn't miss anything important here. The TV supports 4K at 120 Hz, VRR and ALLM, so we can easily take advantage of the PlayStation 5 or Xbox Series X. HGiG also works correctly, so with HDR properly set on the console, games retain the correct brightness and we don't unnecessarily lose detail in the brightest parts of the picture. The only major omission is Dolby Vision Gaming, which Samsung does not support on any of its TVs. The Game Bar is also very useful — a handy menu you can bring up without leaving the game. We can quickly check the frame rate, VRR status or change key picture settings. Samsung also adds a few less obvious features, such as the ability to change the aspect ratio and Game Motion Plus, which can further smooth games running at 30 or 60 frames per second. Of course this comes at the cost of higher input lag (around 55 ms), but for slower-paced titles it may be an interesting addition for some people.

Input lag

9.8/10

9.6/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
18 ms
1080p120
10 ms
13 ms
2160p60
16 ms
18 ms
2160p120
10 ms
13 ms

HDR

2160p60
15 ms
17 ms
2160p120
9 ms
12 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
15 ms
2160p120 DV
9 ms

Input lag on the UR8S is very low. With a 60 Hz signal we measured around 15–16 ms, while switching to 120 Hz reduces the delay to around 9–10 ms. Importantly, we obtained similar results in HDR and Dolby Vision, so using those formats does not noticeably increase the lag. In practice the response to controls is very quick and even more demanding gamers should have no reason to complain.

Input lag on the R85H is low, though not record-breaking. At 120 Hz it is around 12–13 ms, and at 60 Hz around 17–18 ms. In practice this makes little difference; the controls are responsive and you won't notice any lag during normal gaming.

Compatibility with PC

8.5/10

8/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
9ms
13ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
180Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The UR8S also works very well as a large computer monitor. The TV correctly handles 4:4:4 chroma subsampling at maximum resolution and refresh rate, so small fonts remain legible and do not have severely jagged or coloured edges. The BGR subpixel layout used is not a major issue here and text still looks good, although picky users will notice that they are not perfect.

There is also a refresh rate of up to 180 Hz at 4K, G-Sync support and very low input lag, which at the maximum refresh rate is around 9 ms. So if someone wanted to use the UR8S not only for a console but also for gaming on a powerful PC, the TV is really well suited to that.

The R85H has a lot to offer when connected to a PC as well. In 4K we can use the full 144 Hz, and if you prioritise frame rate above all else, dropping to Full HD lets the TV push the refresh rate up to 240 Hz. It also supports G-Sync and FreeSync and has low input lag, so the R85H can easily double as a large gaming monitor. Text legibility is somewhat weaker, though. The TV correctly supports 4:4:4 chroma subsampling, so in theory it has everything needed to render fonts sharply. In practice, however, some fonts show small colour artefacts, especially with dark text and high-contrast edges. It’s not a problem that prevents normal use, but if you plan to sit close to the screen and use the R85H mainly as a monitor for text, it’s worth bearing in mind. It is far better suited to PC gaming.

Viewing angles

5.5/10

4.8/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
74%
80%

Viewing angles on the UR8S are quite good, helped by the use of RGB backlighting. Thanks to the three-colour LEDs, colours seen at an angle hold up better than on many conventional Mini-LEDs that use white or blue backlighting. Of course, it is still not at the level of OLED, and certainly not QD-OLED. At wider angles the image loses a little contrast and saturation, but for an LCD TV the result is really decent.

Viewing angles on the R85H are rather acceptable and that's basically all the praise they get. It's still a VA panel, and panels of this type are not the best choice if you often watch the television from a wide angle. As you move to the side the image loses contrast and blacks start to look increasingly grey. The R85H does, however, have an advantage over conventional VA TVs. Thanks to its tri-colour RGB backlight, colours viewed at an angle don't lose saturation as quickly and the 'washed-out' effect is somewhat less noticeable. If you often watch the television with a larger group and some people sit well to the side, there are screens on the market that handle this task much better.

Daytime performance

9.5/10

7.3/10

Panel finish
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Good
Black levels during daytime
Average
Good

Panel brightness

Samsung R85H / R86H: 726 cd/m2

Hisense UR8S: 1468 cd/m2

The UR8S performs excellently for daytime viewing. First and foremost it is a very bright TV: in SDR we measured around 1500 nits, so even with a lot of ambient light the picture remains punchy and easy to read. A big plus is the matt finish, which very effectively scatters reflections from windows and lamps. Instead of a distinct reflection on the screen you see more of a soft, blurred glow that is far less distracting while watching.

It is worth noting, however, that the coating works best when you view the TV straight on. At a wider angle it starts to resemble a satin finish and reflections become more pronounced and therefore more bothersome. In a brightly lit room blacks also lose some of their depth, but at such high brightness this is not a major problem. Overall the UR8S is simply a very good choice for a bright living room.

In a bright room the R85H performs quite well, although much depends on the local dimming setting. For daytime viewing we recommend setting it to High, because the TV noticeably increases its brightness then. On large bright areas it reaches around 600 nits, and on smaller sections it can approach 1000 nits, so the picture remains easy to see even with stronger light in the living room. The satin coating handles reflections reasonably well and in most cases does not turn the screen into a mirror, although strong light sources will of course still be visible.

However, bear in mind that the High setting means the local dimming algorithm works more aggressively. Therefore for evening viewing we recommend switching it to Low. The TV won't be as bright then, but it preserves details in the brightest parts of the image better, which at night we think is much more important than maximum brightness.

Local dimming

5%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Low

445

485

517

532

537

542

551

556

556

573

556

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED RGB
Mini-LED RGB
Software version during testing
V01.09.60W.Q0624
1204
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Hisense UR8S TV Panel details
Review Samsung R85H / R86H TV Panel details

Hisense UR8S

Samsung R85H / R86H

TV features

9.4/10

7.3/10

  • System
    VIDAA
    Tizen
  • System performance
    Very good
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Hisense UR8S TV features
Review Hisense UR8S TV features
Review Hisense UR8S TV features
Review Samsung R85H / R86H TV features
Review Samsung R85H / R86H TV features
Review Samsung R85H / R86H TV features
Review Samsung R85H / R86H TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Classic features

Hisense is one of those manufacturers that, fortunately, has not yet abandoned the classic functions of a television. The UR8S allows you to record programmes to USB, schedule recordings, has teletext and an audio-only mode. You can also use the TV’s speakers and Bluetooth headphones at the same time. The only thing missing is picture-in-picture (PiP). The remote deserves praise as well. It is well made, backlit and has plenty of buttons, so you can access most key functions without digging through menus. It communicates with the TV via radio, so you do not need to point it directly at the screen.

VIDAA system

The VIDAA system itself runs very quickly and responsively on the UR8S. Apps launch smoothly, navigation is fluid and during our tests we had no major complaints about its performance. The app library is already large enough to include all the major streaming services. There are also extra Smart features. The UR8S supports AirPlay, Miracast, Polish voice search and the ability to connect a keyboard and mouse. VIDAA may not offer as much freedom as Google TV, but for everyday use it provides pretty much everything you need.

Television features

If the R85H is also to be used for watching traditional broadcast TV, Samsung offers pretty much everything you would expect from a modern model. Channel navigation is convenient, the programme guide is clear, and switching between channels doesn't take too long. There is also the standard set of tuners and support for CI+ modules. It's a pity, though, that Samsung has for some time been limiting some of the more traditional features that once distinguished feature-rich TVs. It's clear that streaming and the whole Smart TV ecosystem have become far more important to the manufacturer today. For example, you won't find the ability to record TV channels to USB storage or to split the screen using PiP.

Smart TV features

This is handled by the well-known Tizen. The system runs smoothly and provides access to virtually all popular VOD apps, so Netflix, Disney+, Max, Prime Video, YouTube and other local services are available without much trouble. The interface itself is fairly feature-rich and takes a moment to get used to, but afterwards navigating it is very straightforward. Samsung is also developing features that go beyond simply watching films and series. SmartThings lets you connect the R85H to smart home devices and control them directly from the screen. There is AirPlay, smartphone screen mirroring, and Multi View if you want to display two different sources side by side. So it's hard to fault the system in terms of capabilities.

Apps

8.3/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.5/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
Yes
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The USB file player works correctly and handles most popular content without major problems. Our main reservation concerns photo handling. The UR8S is rather selective about photos' resolutions; for example, it can open a 16 or 32 Mpix image but refuse to display a 10, 12 or 20 Mpix file. There's little logic to it, so if someone often views photos directly from a USB stick, they may occasionally encounter a file the TV simply won't open.

The built-in media player handles most popular video, audio and photo formats. The on-screen menu runs smoothly, and thumbnails load without delay even in folders containing hundreds of files. For photos you can open JPEG, PNG or BMP files in high resolution without any problem, although the list of supported formats has gaps. The most noticeable omission is support for HEIC (iPhone photos) and some more niche formats such as WebP, GIF or TIFF. For a traditional holiday photo slideshow the player is entirely adequate.

Sound

7.8/10

7.1/10

  • Maximum volume
    92dB
    89dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

In terms of sound, the UR8S performs very similarly to the lower-tier Hisense U7S Pro, and that's no coincidence. The manufacturer has used practically the same 2.1.2 configuration rated at a total of 50 W. There's an additional subwoofer at the back of the cabinet, while the other speakers are positioned in the lower part of the TV. For built-in speakers, the performance is quite good. The subwoofer adds some bass, so the sound isn't as flat as in basic TVs, and the whole set can get really loud. In our measurement, the maximum loudness reached about 92 dBC. Of course it's not a replacement for a good soundbar, but it's more than enough for casual TV or YouTube watching.

The audio section of the R85H is a replica of the setup from the QN80H. It uses the same 2.0 stereo kit with 30 W of power, which easily handles dialogue clarity in news programmes and TV series, though for movie blockbusters it's definitely worth adding a soundbar. On board are support for Dolby Atmos, Q-Symphony technology (for pairing with Samsung soundbars) and an "AI Football" mode. The latter lets you use sliders to boost or almost completely remove the commentator's voice relative to the stadium crowd, and although the algorithm can sometimes hesitate, it can be a great addition for fans.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

92dBC (Max)

75dBC

89dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy