Xiaomi S Pro 2026 vs TCL C69K / Q6C

Direct comparison

C69K / Q6C / C6K

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”98”

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.2

7.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.7

    6.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.3

    6.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.4

    6.3

  • Gaming on console

    7.7

    8.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    7.4

    6.4

  • Utility functions

    7.2

    7.0

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.1

    6.5

Advantages

  • Good black and contrast (SDR)

  • Very high peak brightness (great for a bright lounge)

  • Complete package for gamers (144 Hz panel, HDMI 2.1, VRR)

  • Extremely low input lag in SDR mode (below 10 ms)

  • Surprisingly good, strong sound (branded by Harman Kardon)

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS:X

  • Rich Google TV system (with AirPlay and Chromecast)

  • Proper compatibility with PC (clear fonts and 288Hz mode)

  • Excellent price-to-specification ratio

  • Very good contrast and black levels: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Good motion fluidity: High refresh rate of 144Hz

  • Decent panel brightness

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HDMI 2.1, HGiG

  • Additional mode for PC gamers: 240Hz

  • GoogleTV system with a wide selection of apps

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Very attractive price

Disadvantages

No like
  • Local dimming algorithms practically don't work in HDR content

  • Useless Dolby Vision Gaming mode (input lag approx. 100 ms)

  • Poorly implemented HGiG mode

  • Strongly visible banding (colour stepping) in dark scenes

  • Very weak upscaling and digital image processing

  • Google TV system can "lag behind"

  • Managing the backlighting could be more precise

  • Minor, occasional errors in the system

  • Slight trailing visible in dynamic scenes

  • Great chaos in the naming (many derivative models that differ in nothing)

Our verdict

Is it worth buying the Xiaomi S Pro 2026? The answer to this question is quite complicated. Let's start with what is really great about this TV. First of all, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 has an outstanding price-to-performance ratio. It features a Mini LED panel with very high brightness, which performs excellently in a sunlit living room. Additionally, it has a fast 144 Hz (or even 288 Hz) panel and a full gaming package: two HDMI 2.1 ports, support for VRR, and impressively low input lag (below 10 ms). If you mainly watch 'regular' content and play games, this is a fantastic screen. Even the built-in 30W speakers are surprisingly good and support Dolby Atmos. Unfortunately, there is also a second, very problematic side to this model. In short: the software. We have the impression that Xiaomi has given us great 'parts', but hasn't managed to make them work together properly. The biggest issue is the HDR mode – the main reason why people buy TVs today. For unknown reasons, the TV in HDR mode (HDR10, Dolby Vision) does not manage its dimming zones well. As a result, blacks that should be deep become grey or navy blue, like in a regular LCD TV. On top of that, there are other software issues such as the terrible implementation of HGiG or the fact that the Dolby Vision mode for gamers is unusable due to immense input lag (100 ms). Additionally, the TV's capability to process image digitally is very poor. So how can we summarise this in terms of price? In its price range, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 crushes the competition in terms of specifications. Other TVs for this money are usually basic LCD models without dimming, and often only have a 60 Hz panel. The question then is: what is more important to you? If you're simply looking for a very bright and affordable TV for watching during the day and gaming, and you're willing to calibrate it – you will be very pleased with it. However, if you're looking for a TV to enjoy impressive HDR in movies and games straight out of the box, you will be terribly disappointed with this model. In that case, in our opinion, it's better to pay a bit more for a basic OLED TV or a more refined Mini-LED model from the competition.

The TCL C69K / Q6C is a TV that perfectly targets gamers and movie fans on a reasonable budget. Its biggest strength is the combination of a VA panel with Mini-LED backlighting. Simply put, contrast is high and blacks are deep, making evening movie sessions look truly impressive. Add to that a 144 Hz refresh rate, which does wonders not only for sports but especially for gaming. And for gamers, it’s a full package: HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, HGiG, and even a 240 Hz option for PC. Throw in Dolby Vision, which gives movies a cinematic touch, and you get a picture that’s just pleasing to the eye. On the software side, it runs Google TV with the Gemini AI assistant, so there’s no shortage of apps. The sound system holds up well too — Dolby Atmos and DTS support are nice additions, complemented by branded Onkyo speakers. Of course, it’s not perfect. The local dimming system can sometimes struggle in complex scenes, slightly lifting black levels. And those Polish translations in the menu... let’s just say they could use some work. Still, the C69K / Q6C makes a very strong case for itself. Considering the price, it’s one of the most interesting all-around TVs for both movies and gaming. Definitely worth watching out for during sales — and hoping for TCL’s usual post-launch firmware improvements.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.4/10

7.3/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 532 (28 x 19)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Contrast:

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

1,001,650:1

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

52,600:1

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

17,900:1

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

17,200:1

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

10,150:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

113,750:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

17,350:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

16,300:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

9,850:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

4,850:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Let's get to the point, which is what’s most important in the Mini LED panel: blacks and contrast. The Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is built on a VA matrix, which right off the bat promises deep blacks. On top of that, it features Mini LED backlighting with a very large number of local dimming zones. In the 65-inch variant we tested, we counted as many as 532. That’s a solid figure that should provide precise control over the backlighting. It should be noted that this number is proportional to size – opting for the smaller 55-inch variant will have fewer zones, while larger models will have more.

So, how does the black level perform on the S Pro 2026? The answer is complex.

Overall, it’s really not bad, and we see a clear improvement compared to the problematic model from 2025. As you can see on our measurement charts, the results are occasionally spectacular. In the majority of the film scenes we measured in SDR (standard dynamic range), the contrast could easily be called very good and even comparable to constructions three times more expensive. Well, it could be... and this brings us to the paradox of this model. The problem is how the television manages zones in scenarios other than SDR. As soon as we feed the TV a higher-quality signal, such as an HDR series or Dolby Vision from streaming platforms (Netflix, HBO Max, or Disney+), something strange happens. We have an irresistible impression that the TV suddenly... forgets it was equipped with local dimming zones at all. As shown in our video below, black levels in such scenes resemble more dark gray or navy shades. To this is added a slight flickering of the entire screen. This is a level we would expect from televisions completely lacking local dimming systems. It seems that Xiaomi, over the course of a year, chose to fix one key issue from last year’s 2025 model. And they succeeded – there’s no more annoying “zone disco”, the image is stable. It’s just a shame that when consuming high-quality content (HDR), this entire advanced system becomes completely useless.

The heart of the picture in TCL C69K / Q6C is the VA panel (specifically HVA from TCL CSOT), which offers a robust native contrast of around 6000–7000:1, even before local dimming is activated. However, the real strength of this model lies in the Mini-LED backlighting with the ability to dim individual zones. In the 55-inch unit we tested, we counted approximately 180 of these zones (this number increases with the diagonal size). For this price segment, the contrast is truly impressive. In less complicated movie scenes, such as segments from “Oblivion,” it looks magnificent, and shots immersed in black are very striking. Nevertheless, the characteristics of Mini-LED technology mean that we won’t always avoid issues – in more demanding frames with many bright details, halo effects or excessive dimming of certain elements can appear (regardless of the chosen local dimming settings). Nonetheless, contrast is undeniably a strong point of C69K / Q6C.

HDR effect quality

6.3/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.6%, Bt.2020: 70.9%
DCI P3: 92.7%, Bt.2020: 71.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

809 nit

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

526 nit

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

1033 nit

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

469 nit

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

718 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

610 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

425 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

148 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

589 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C69K / Q6C

Xiaomi S Pro 2026

When it comes to HDR quality, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is undoubtedly a very bright television. On our synthetic measurement patterns, we were able to achieve peak brightness of around 1400 nits. This result is not only very good but quite spectacular, considering the price of this model. However, as we always say, our editorial team values measurements and the viewing experience of content that people watch on a daily basis – from movies to series. So let’s analyse how Xiaomi performs with film material. The result is, unfortunately, quite mixed. When very bright scenes appear on screen, the S Pro 2026 truly shows its full capabilities and can achieve a real 800-1000 nits on bright elements. Moreover, even smaller objects can "burn" the eyes – in scenes from the movie Sicario 2, small metallic parts of the helicopter were really vivid. The problem is – and here the story comes full circle, returning to our contrast assessment – that in such scenes, we can’t count on absolutely cinematic black. In our opinion, this compromise is too significant; the high visibility of details in bright sections should not come at the expense of such a substantial drop in blacks. And even though the HDR effect can create a stunning impression here, it’s important to remember that when very challenging, mixed scenes appear on screen, we may feel a slight disappointment. Precisely the one we mentioned in the previous paragraph regarding issues with dimming in HDR mode. As a consolation, it’s worth adding that the S Pro 2026 is equipped with an additional PFS filter (similar in function to a QLED layer), which effectively broadens the colour gamut coverage. As a result, measurements showed DCI-P3 coverage reaching 94%. This gives us confidence that in most colourful scenes, the image will look rich and properly saturated.

In terms of brightness, TCL C69K / Q6C is a moderate model. In optimal movie conditions, it shows its full potential, reaching a maximum of around 600 nits. In scenes with large, intense light sources, the HDR effect can be truly satisfying, giving a cinematic glow. However, it's important to keep in mind that when managing the backlight zones, there are situations where parts of the image are dimmed, and at times become barely visible. This suggests that there is still a lack of proper optimization of the algorithms, although considering the technical parameters in this price range, the overall construction still looks very good.

Factory color reproduction

4.1/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Of course, all our measurements were conducted in "Film" mode, which is typically the best and most faithful choice we get straight after taking the TV out of the box. And to put it bluntly: while this is the best mode, it is still very far from perfect. Above all, the TV has a clear tendency to give the picture a cool, blueish tint – this is due to poorly set colour balance. Additionally, there is the issue of how the S Pro 2026 manages its brightness straight out of the box, which results in an over-saturated image. These two flaws contribute to really significant colourimetric errors (Delta E). In HDR content, they could double exceed our expected error scale of "10" (i.e. reaching values close to 20). Just to remind you – the threshold of perceivable error by the human eye is a Delta E value of around 3. Results at the level of 20 mean that the image significantly deviates from what the director intended.

The Filmmaker Mode, which has been introduced in this year's TCL TVs (including the C69K / Q6C), is definitely the best choice "to start with". This is the mode we recommend for everyday movie and series viewing. Unfortunately, as is often the case, best does not mean perfect. In SDR materials, the image turned out to be too warm, with a strong red tint in the white balance. The opposite impression was had with HDR content – here the image became cooler than it should have been, due to an excess of blue. Additionally, there is the brightness characteristic, which at times resulted in overexposures. In practice, this translated to fairly noticeable errors in color tests, which is difficult to accept in a mode branded as "by the creators".

Color reproduction after calibration

7.2/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

So how does the S Pro 2026 perform after our calibration process? We must admit that after calibration, the TV becomes a really enjoyable device for watching everyday content. As you can see in the charts, in HD (SDR) material, both white balance and gamma values have been brought to nearly perfection. Most importantly, colourimetric errors have become practically invisible to the human eye. In this scenario, the S Pro 2026 is simply a great TV that, after professional calibration, can provide a lot of joy from viewing. However, it is worth noting clearly – our efforts did little to help in 4K HDR mode. Despite the calibration, the TV still interprets the image quite strongly in its "own way," which is clearly evident in the measurement of the EOTF curve (brightness tracking). It's a bit of a shame because it shows that the problem lies not with the panel itself, but with the software. Poorly refined image management algorithms in HDR content can, unfortunately, rule this TV out for many more discerning users.

Through white balance adjustment, we were able to significantly reduce the tendency of ChooseTV C69K / Q6C to distort colours, which resulted in a very good final outcome. After calibration, the problem of excessive warming of scenes in SDR and over-cooling of the image in HDR disappeared. However, it's worth analysing the brightness characteristics more closely. While in SDR content there are few complaints – the picture looks really good, especially in older films, TV programmes, or on YouTube – it performs much worse with HDR content. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests that everything is fine, but in practice (EOTF in films), the limitations of the actual construction become evident. This model tends to excessively brighten small parts of the frame, while in other situations, it darkens the entire scene too much. The effect of calibration is therefore undeniable, and in terms of colourimetry, ChooseTV C69K / Q6C gains a lot. Unfortunately, certain limitations arising from local dimming management simply cannot be bypassed.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

9.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Now, let’s move on to the analysis of tonal transitions, which refers to the fluidity with which the television can render transitions between closely related shades. In the case of the Xiaomi S Pro 2026, the image that emerges is extremely dualistic. On one hand, we have bright gradations. When scenes with a blue sky or other smooth transitions appear in the bright parts of the image, the S Pro 2026 handles them excellently. They look perfectly smooth, without any visible artifacts.

Unfortunately, the situation changes dramatically as soon as dark scenes take over the screen. To put it bluntly – they look really poor. Instead of a smooth tonal transition in the darkness, the screen clearly shows colour banding and unsightly "stepping" of gradients. This is very noticeable in darker films or games and can effectively ruin the viewing experience.

In the C69K / Q6C model, the tonal transitions (between colours) are very smooth and it's difficult to notice any banding. The image appears natural, and any minor imperfections are only visible on bright test screens, and that only upon very close inspection. In everyday viewing, the effect is simply fantastic. It's safe to say that in this category, the C69K / Q6C performs exceptionally well.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

4.5/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Let's start with the issue we raised in the previous paragraph: can a TV even fix the problem of terrible tonal transitions in dark scenes? Theoretically yes – in the menu, we find a feature with the promising name "Colour Contour Removal." Well, "theoretically." Unfortunately, in practice, this setting – regardless of which of the three power levels is chosen – yielded absolutely no real results. So we are dealing with a feature that practically only exists in the menu. Moving on to the quality of upscaling (scaling from a lower resolution to 4K), unfortunately, we have more bad news for you. The S Pro 2026 handles this task very poorly. Interestingly, the phenomenon of "overscan" (slight image cropping) is not a major issue here. The problem is that the TV simply shows a very raw, unprocessed image. Its attempt to boost the signal to a higher resolution looks simply dull and lacks any "intelligent" enhancement. There's no denying it – the entire digital image processing is the true Achilles' heel of this model.

In terms of image scaling, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. Lower quality content is presented acceptably, and due to the lack of overscan issues, the image is displayed in full without any cropping. However, don’t expect miracles – materials of very low quality won’t gain a second life here, as the image processor has its limitations.

On thin lines and details, there is noticeable jaggedness, which reveals the lack of more advanced image enhancement algorithms. It's also a shame that the C69K / Q6C lacks a feature for smoothing tonal transitions. As a result, in older films or video materials, color banding can be visible and may become distracting during extended viewing.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.5/10

7.3/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
BFI function 120Hz
No
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (1080p@288Hz):

Blur ():

On paper, the specifications of the S Pro 2026 look impressive. The television is equipped with a native 144 Hz panel, capable of displaying images at up to 288 Hz in a dedicated gaming mode. These are incredible results, but what we were most interested in, in the context of everyday use, was how the TV handles motion blur and how the picture looks at 120 Hz. After all, this is the frequency used today by consoles such as the PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X/S, and it is desirable for sports fans. Generally, the panel "holds up". The matrix is quick enough to meet these challenges, and objects displayed at a native smoothness of 120 Hz are rendered correctly. When it comes to software, the TV is equipped with motion smoothing technology, but with a key caveat – it only works for input signals up to 60 Hz. This means it's mainly suitable for traditional TV, movies, and series. With it, we can adjust the smoothness of the picture to our own preferences – ranging from a very smooth, "theatrical" approach, to setting the slider at "zero" and maintaining a fully cinematic character.

The use of a 144 Hz panel in TCL C69K / Q6C is a significant advantage in this price range. This represents an important step forward compared to its predecessor (C655 PRO), which only offered 60 Hz at 4K. The difference is particularly noticeable when watching sports or gaming – the ball, players, and dynamic action in games are displayed more clearly and without losing detail. An interesting feature is also the panel's ability to operate at 240 Hz (which the manufacturer does not officially mention) – we will revisit this topic in relation to the PC gaming mode. TCL has also added a feature for movie fans: “Motion Clarity.” This allows users to adjust the picture to their own preferences using two simple sliders. We can either leave the visible film frame or opt for a very smooth one, "

Console compatibility and gaming features

8.2/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 240Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Warning Yes, high input lag
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

For gamers, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is on paper an almost perfect proposition. It has been equipped with two HDMI 2.1 ports, which allow us to unlock (although these options are somewhat hidden in the menu) the full suite of features: ALLM, VRR, and, crucially, the ability to operate in 4K at 144 Hz. This last feature should particularly please owners of powerful PCs. The TV also has something resembling a gamer panel – and while it’s hard to call it a full-fledged "Gamebar," it does its job by displaying key information. It’s just a shame that in its default form, it covers a relatively large part of the screen.

The biggest problem we have with this model, however, concerns how the S Pro 2026 handles games in HDR mode. To put it bluntly: it doesn’t handle it well. Due to the poorly implemented HGiG feature (the HDR tone mapping standard for games), during the initial HDR calibration on the console, it’s very easy to "blow out" the image. If someone is unaware of this software flaw and follows the on-screen instructions, they will simply set the picture incorrectly, with burnt-out details in bright areas. Another significant issue is the Dolby Vision mode for games. While it works, it generates such a high input lag that it becomes noticeable in dynamic titles. (You can check all our lag measurements in the paragraph below). In summary: Generally, this is a really very good screen for gamers, but with one small caveat. We would rather avoid HDR mode on it – unless we decide to manually set the brightness slider on the console "by eye," completely ignoring the tips from the console's pictogram.

TCL C69K / Q6C is a television that can confidently be called equipment designed for gamers. Here we have 4K at 144 Hz, VRR support, automatic game mode (ALLM), and Dolby Vision Gaming. Additionally, there's a practical Game Bar, which is a panel with the most important settings within easy reach – handy when we want to change something quickly during gameplay (e.g., aspect ratio: Yes, it can be done!). The wide range of VRR, reaching up to 240 Hz, is noteworthy. However, this option is mainly for PC gamers looking to go below native 4K resolution. In this case, the television can spread its wings and show additional smoothness, particularly in fast e-sport titles. For consoles, we stick to the standard limit of 120 Hz, but even so, the possibilities are truly extensive. The only minor criticism is slight ghosting that can sometimes be seen in dynamic scenes. Other than that, C69K / Q6C offers everything gamers expect from a television.

Input lag

8.5/10

9.7/10

SDR

1080p60
17 ms
18 ms
1080p120
8 ms
10 ms
2160p60
17 ms
18 ms
2160p120
8 ms
10 ms

HDR

2160p60
17 ms
17 ms
2160p120
8 ms
11 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
110 ms
17 ms
2160p120 DV
77 ms
9 ms

We’re moving on to one of the most important measurements for gamers, which is signal delay (input lag). Overall, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 performs excellently here. Generally, in game mode, the lag is very low. With 120 Hz content (from consoles or PC), we easily achieved results below 10 ms. These are truly outstanding results and, in practice, absolutely unnoticeable for most people, even those who are very sensitive. Unfortunately, there is one "but," which constitutes the biggest drawback of this model for gaming. We're talking about Dolby Vision Gaming mode. When this mode is activated, the input lag rises to an astronomical level of about 100 ms. At such a value, the delay between our movements on the controller (we tested on an Xbox console) and what is displayed on the screen becomes really very large and annoying. Therefore, our recommendation is simple: we absolutely do not recommend using Dolby Vision Gaming mode on this television.

In terms of input lag, TCL C69K / Q6C performs remarkably well. With 120 Hz content, the delay is around 10 ms, and at times even less. This is a level where the response is practically instantaneous, and it's hard to find any complaints. For 60 Hz materials, the result is around 18 ms – still a very good result, completely sufficient for comfortable gaming.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
8ms
11ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Generally, when it comes to gaming, the S Pro 2026 is a great screen for PC owners. It offers a refresh rate of up to 288 Hz at Full HD resolution or a full 144 Hz at 4K. All of this, supported by technologies like AMD FreeSync and G-Sync, really means a lot for very demanding gamers. And what about "desktop" work? Here we have good news. Although the displayed font may not be perfectly sharp (like on a dedicated PC monitor with an IPS panel), it is presented in a really pleasant and readable way. This is due to the correct implementation of Chroma 4:4:4 sampling, which ensures that the text is clear and there are no issues with colour fringing.

As a computer monitor, TCL C69K / Q6C performs excellently. At its native resolution, we achieve 4K at 144 Hz, and by lowering the resolution, it can even reach up to 240 Hz. The TV also works with Nvidia and AMD cards, supporting both G-Sync and FreeSync. For office work, there are also very few complaints. Thanks to 4:4:4 chroma support, the fonts are sharp and readable, and any minor imperfections are so small that in everyday use they remain unnoticed.

Viewing angles

3.7/10

3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
66%
78%

As for a TV equipped with a VA panel, we must admit that the drop in brightness when deviating from the screen's axis is relatively minor on the Xiaomi S Pro 2026. However, it is important to remember the second, crucial aspect – colour saturation degrades significantly at an angle. This is typical behaviour for TVs with VA panels that lack additional coatings to widen viewing angles. Is this a disadvantage of this TV? Not really. It's simply a characteristic, the price we have to pay for the key benefits of a VA panel in terms of its high native contrast.

In the TCL C69K / Q6C, the viewing angles are typical for a VA panel. When sitting directly in front, the picture looks very good, but any shift to the side results in a noticeable drop in colour saturation and brightness. The difference is especially visible in colourful scenes – the hues become washed out, and the contrast loses its depth. Compared to IPS panels, this is a clearly weaker result, although the better black levels and higher native contrast remain a compensation.

Daytime performance

7.4/10

6.4/10

Panel finish
Glare
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

TCL C69K / Q6C: 532 cd/m2

Xiaomi S Pro 2026: 771 cd/m2

Due to its extremely high peak brightness, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 performs really well in bright, sunlit rooms. In most scenarios, it's able to "break through" even very strong lighting in the room. However, it's worth noting that the matrix used here does a fairly average job of suppressing reflections. This means that in darker areas of the image, or when the TV is displaying a dark scene, direct reflections (e.g., window or lamp reflections) can be irritating. Nevertheless, the S Pro 2026, as a TV for a bright living room, excels really well thanks to its powerful brightness.

In bright lighting conditions, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. The panel offers decent brightness (around 550 nits in SDR materials), which allows for comfortable TV viewing in an average lit living room, even on days when strong light comes in through the windows. As a result, daytime screenings do not require complete room blackout. We also appreciate the fact that the screen coating does quite well in reducing reflections, so the TV doesn't become a "mirror" even in strong light. However, this is not on the level of top models with more advanced anti-reflective coatings – in very challenging conditions (e.g., with large windows), reflections will be visible.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED PFS LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
UKN1.240806.107.V816.0.25.6.6.ULBMIXM
V8-T653T01-LF1V531.002396
Image processor
mt5896 2,5gb ram
MT5896 2,5GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 TV Panel details
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV Panel details

Xiaomi S Pro 2026

TCL C69K / Q6C

TV features

7.2/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 TV features
Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 TV features
Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features

Operating System (Google TV)

An enormous advantage of the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is undoubtedly the presence of the Google TV system. This gives us access to a gigantic library of apps – we can literally find everything here, from leading VOD platforms to niche players. The system also offers plenty of useful features, such as built-in Chromecast, support for AirPlay and Screen Mirroring, and efficiently functioning voice search. The Google TV system itself is great, but Xiaomi's implementation needs a little adjustment. During our tests, it occasionally experienced a proverbial "breathlessness." Animations would stutter slightly, and the response to commands was not immediate. This is certainly not the level of fluidity we know from top-tier, significantly more expensive models equipped with more powerful processors.

TV Features and Connectivity

So how does the S Pro 2026 perform as a "regular" television? Unfortunately, we have less good news here. In terms of traditional television viewing, we can mainly praise this model for having a convenient remote with a numeric keypad – which (surprisingly) is no longer a standard today. However, this is where the conveniences end. We won’t find either USB recording functionality (PVR) or PiP (Picture-in-Picture) options. On the plus side, we acknowledge the extensive Bluetooth connectivity options. We were able to connect external devices to the TV without any problems, such as wireless headphones, a keyboard, or a mouse, which significantly eases operation.

Multimedia Features: Google TV

The Google TV system is undoubtedly the strongest user feature of TCL C69K / Q6C. It gives the television character and provides an advantage over many competitors. We receive a full suite of services: from support for popular streaming applications to support for screen mirroring and AirPlay (allowing iPhone users to feel right at home). Additionally, there’s Google Assistant, now in the Gemini AI version, which not only answers questions but also efficiently carries out simple commands (e.g. changing channels or searching for content in VOD). The system itself operates quite responsively. However, we cannot overlook a certain drawback: the awkward translations in the Polish menu can bring a smile, but sometimes require a moment of thought to decipher their meaning.

Classic Features

In terms of classic television features, TCL C69K / Q6C performs rather mediocrely. There’s no USB recording or PiP mode, which may disappoint some users. However, the manufacturer hasn’t forgotten the basics: teletext television and a clear EPG are available, which still matter to some viewers. Daily use is also aided by Bluetooth support for external audio devices. This is a simple way to connect, for example, a speaker or headphones, which can be a practical solution for seniors. Beyond this, it is difficult to find elements that would distinguish C69K / Q6C from its rivals – it is simply a solid but standard package of basic features.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

6.8/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in, default media player in the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is – considering the capabilities of the Google TV system – simply poor. Its biggest disadvantage is that it does not support characters beyond those from the standard alphabet. Consequently, it does not display, among other things, Polish fonts in subtitles or file names. Fortunately, as we mentioned earlier, the heart of the television is Google TV. This system allows for the quick installation of an external player, which is significantly better, such as VLC or Kodi. For this television, we recommend installing an alternative player immediately after the first startup.

The built-in media player in TCL C69K / Q6C performs really well – practically all popular file formats work without major issues. There are indeed a few minor exceptions, particularly with less common codecs or unusual video file configurations, but in everyday use, this is rarely noticeable. The biggest plus, however, is that the TV runs on Google TV, which provides complete freedom in choosing additional software. If someone encounters a file that the standard player cannot handle, it's enough to install an alternative – such as VLC – and the problem disappears.

Sound

7.1/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    82dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

We have to admit that the S Pro 2026 really surprised us in a positive way. The television is equipped with a 30W speaker system, which, for its class, sounds really very good. There’s even a perceivable hint of bass, and the mids and highs are quite well balanced. Of course, all this is within the capabilities of the television's speakers, but it’s a level we didn't expect from such a relatively cheap model. A huge plus is also the support for top audio technologies. The television is able to decode not only the very popular Dolby Atmos format but also the recently rather rare DTS:X, which we mainly find on Blu-ray discs.

In terms of audio, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. The manufacturer has been boasting about its collaboration with the Onkyo brand for several years, and this does reflect in the sound quality. The sound is pleasant, with clear mid-tones and a fairly clean high end, giving an overall impression of being well-balanced. Of course, it won't replace a full-fledged soundbar, especially regarding bass depth, but for built-in speakers in a TV from this price segment – it's really quite good.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

82dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data