XIAOMI A PRO 2026 vs TCL C69K / Q6C

Direct comparison

C69K / Q6C / C6K

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”98”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

7.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.0

    6.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.7

    6.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.7

    6.3

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    8.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    4.9

    6.4

  • Utility functions

    6.1

    7.0

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.0

    6.5

Advantages

  • VA panel with good native contrast and decent blacks

  • Supports Game Boost mode at 120 Hz in 1080p and 1440p

  • Low input lag in 120 Hz mode

  • Google TV – vast selection of apps and services

  • Wide colour gamut coverage (around 94% DCI-P3)

  • Good colours after calibration in SDR mode

  • Supports popular audio formats (Dolby Atmos, DTS:X)

  • Large, easy-to-read remote with numeric keypad – convenient for seniors

  • Very good contrast and black levels: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Good motion fluidity: High refresh rate of 144Hz

  • Decent panel brightness

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HDMI 2.1, HGiG

  • Additional mode for PC gamers: 240Hz

  • GoogleTV system with a wide selection of apps

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Very attractive price

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Lack of real support for HDR10+ and other more advanced HDR formats (e.g., Dolby Vision)

  • Significant limitations when working with PC – no chroma 4:4:4, heavy dithering, poor font readability

  • Poor viewing angles (typical for VA)

  • Clunky build, legs mounted in plastic with screws

  • Weird system issues – stuttering, errors with Miracast and sound switching

  • Upscaling and digital image processing is virtually non-existent

  • Very weak sound, practically no bass (we felt it performed worse than the "2025" model)

  • Managing the backlighting could be more precise

  • Minor, occasional errors in the system

  • Slight trailing visible in dynamic scenes

  • Great chaos in the naming (many derivative models that differ in nothing)

Our verdict

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television that, at first glance, doesn’t reveal significant changes compared to its predecessor. Someone might even think it’s just a copy of last year's model with a different sticker. And there’s some truth to that, as the main novelty, or rather the only noticeable difference, is the 120 Hz mode at lower resolutions. It must be said that Xiaomi has done well here; this addition really makes a difference – it’s not a solution for professional gamers, but a nod towards those looking for a smoother image during casual gaming. This is where the A Pro 2026 can stand out – with a simple yet clever idea that sets it apart in the “super budget” segment. Unfortunately, when we start looking at the television more broadly, the enthusiasm quickly wanes. Even though the year has changed on the calendar, most of the issues known from the A Pro 2025 are still with us – the system can still experience strange stutters, and the occasional errors can be quite frustrating. On top of that, there's a lack of any serious digital image processing tools, which worked quite decently last year. As a result, there are many limitations in the design that the competition in a similar price range is already trying to cover up in some way. When it comes to image quality, we won't sugarcoat it either. Brightness at the level of 200–300 nits doesn’t stand a chance against more demanding content. Sure, with simpler streaming content, you can watch something, but with high-budget productions, it’s immediately clear why the television costs what it does. The impression that we are viewing a flat image stripped of details accompanies us pretty much every time. And this brings us to the crux of the matter. The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television for those who really don’t demand much. As a daily screen for series, news, or YouTube, it performs decently, especially thanks to its operating system, which is GoogleTV. Also, if someone is looking for budget equipment and would additionally like a taste of smoother gameplay in games thanks to the 120 Hz mode, they might even be satisfied. However, anyone expecting at least average image quality, a stable system, and proper functionality will soon notice that there are other budget models on the market that simply perform better.

The TCL C69K / Q6C is a TV that perfectly targets gamers and movie fans on a reasonable budget. Its biggest strength is the combination of a VA panel with Mini-LED backlighting. Simply put, contrast is high and blacks are deep, making evening movie sessions look truly impressive. Add to that a 144 Hz refresh rate, which does wonders not only for sports but especially for gaming. And for gamers, it’s a full package: HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, HGiG, and even a 240 Hz option for PC. Throw in Dolby Vision, which gives movies a cinematic touch, and you get a picture that’s just pleasing to the eye. On the software side, it runs Google TV with the Gemini AI assistant, so there’s no shortage of apps. The sound system holds up well too — Dolby Atmos and DTS support are nice additions, complemented by branded Onkyo speakers. Of course, it’s not perfect. The local dimming system can sometimes struggle in complex scenes, slightly lifting black levels. And those Polish translations in the menu... let’s just say they could use some work. Still, the C69K / Q6C makes a very strong case for itself. Considering the price, it’s one of the most interesting all-around TVs for both movies and gaming. Definitely worth watching out for during sales — and hoping for TCL’s usual post-launch firmware improvements.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Budget
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.1/10

7.3/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Contrast:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,000:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,550:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,600:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,900:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

113,750:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

17,350:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

16,300:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

9,850:1

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

Result

4,850:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Contrast and black detail

One of the biggest advantages of even a budget construction like the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the VA panel it uses. This is responsible for quite decent contrast, which in our measurements oscillated between 5000:1 and 7000:1. On the screen, this translates to a stable image with fairly deep blacks – something that's hard to find in competing models with IPS panels without local dimming. Xiaomi has also added a global dimming function for the entire panel. It sounds good, but… we advise turning it off straight away. Why? Because the screen behaves very strangely in darker scenes – sometimes it dims so much that you can hardly see anything, and other times it brightens so much that the already dark blue-black turns into a bright blue. At those moments, it felt as if the TV was simply damaged. Fortunately, without this function, the contrast looks really solid. It’s definitely not on the level of advanced TVs with local dimming, but in its price range, it will easily satisfy most users – especially if you’re not watching in a completely dark room and have at least some background light that effectively masks the imperfections of the "blue-black".

The heart of the picture in TCL C69K / Q6C is the VA panel (specifically HVA from TCL CSOT), which offers a robust native contrast of around 6000–7000:1, even before local dimming is activated. However, the real strength of this model lies in the Mini-LED backlighting with the ability to dim individual zones. In the 55-inch unit we tested, we counted approximately 180 of these zones (this number increases with the diagonal size). For this price segment, the contrast is truly impressive. In less complicated movie scenes, such as segments from “Oblivion,” it looks magnificent, and shots immersed in black are very striking. Nevertheless, the characteristics of Mini-LED technology mean that we won’t always avoid issues – in more demanding frames with many bright details, halo effects or excessive dimming of certain elements can appear (regardless of the chosen local dimming settings). Nonetheless, contrast is undeniably a strong point of C69K / Q6C.

HDR effect quality

4.1/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.6%, Bt.2020: 71.7%
DCI P3: 92.7%, Bt.2020: 71.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

248 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

322 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

315 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

326 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

610 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

425 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

148 nit

Review TCL C69K / Q6C Brightness measurement

Result

589 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 HDR effect quality
Review TCL C69K / Q6C HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 HDR effect quality
Review TCL C69K / Q6C HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 HDR effect quality
Review TCL C69K / Q6C HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 HDR effect quality
Review TCL C69K / Q6C HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C69K / Q6C

HDR luminance

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

HDR luminance

If you're counting on the cinematic HDR experience in the new Xiaomi A Pro 2026, it's best to temper your expectations. This TV is simply too dim to fully realise the potential of contemporary films or series designed for the highest quality image. Our measurements showed brightness levels in the range of 200–300 nits, which are values that are more suited to SDR content than to ambitious HDR productions. In practice, this means that while most films look decent, they certainly won't evoke the 'wow' effect that other TVs do. Fortunately, not everything is lost – credit has to be given to the PFS LED filter used here, a solution similar to the quantum dot technology found in QLEDs. Thanks to this, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette reaches about 94%, resulting in vibrant, saturated colours in the vast majority of materials.

In terms of brightness, TCL C69K / Q6C is a moderate model. In optimal movie conditions, it shows its full potential, reaching a maximum of around 600 nits. In scenes with large, intense light sources, the HDR effect can be truly satisfying, giving a cinematic glow. However, it's important to keep in mind that when managing the backlight zones, there are situations where parts of the image are dimmed, and at times become barely visible. This suggests that there is still a lack of proper optimization of the algorithms, although considering the technical parameters in this price range, the overall construction still looks very good.

Factory color reproduction

3.5/10

5/10

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Factory color reproduction
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Factory color reproduction
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

What we saw in Filmmaker mode really surprised us – and unfortunately not in a good way. The mode advertised as the Hollywood standard resembled more of a display in a shop window. The white balance was shifted towards blue, which led to massive colour errors and the effect of blown-out scenes in SDR content. It was a bit better, though far from perfect, in HDR materials. There were also problems there – colour saturation and the entire palette consistently drifted towards cooler tones, resulting in an image that had an artificial, cold tint rather than a cinematic character. In other words: even in Filmmaker mode, which should be the showcase of this television, we got an effect far from expectations.

The Filmmaker Mode, which has been introduced in this year's TCL TVs (including the C69K / Q6C), is definitely the best choice "to start with". This is the mode we recommend for everyday movie and series viewing. Unfortunately, as is often the case, best does not mean perfect. In SDR materials, the image turned out to be too warm, with a strong red tint in the white balance. The opposite impression was had with HDR content – here the image became cooler than it should have been, due to an excess of blue. Additionally, there is the brightness characteristic, which at times resulted in overexposures. In practice, this translated to fairly noticeable errors in color tests, which is difficult to accept in a mode branded as "by the creators".

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

7.5/10

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Color reproduction after calibration
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Color reproduction after calibration
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Color reproduction after calibration

Even though Xiaomi isn't a brand associated with top-tier televisions, it's fair to say that even in a budget model like the A Pro 2026, the manufacturer left plenty of calibration settings. After a few adjustments, the SDR picture took on a completely new look. The colours stopped veering into blue tones, the whites gained a sense of naturalness, and most errors dropped to a practically invisible level. As a result, SDR content looked very good, surprisingly so for this price range.

It was a slightly different story with HDR materials. Here, it was immediately noticeable what we had already mentioned – the overexposure of bright scenes and issues with balance control. Calibration helped only partially, as the limitations of the panel itself were at play. However, it must be emphasized that in the case of SDR, the television changed beyond recognition, and definitely for the better.

Through white balance adjustment, we were able to significantly reduce the tendency of ChooseTV C69K / Q6C to distort colours, which resulted in a very good final outcome. After calibration, the problem of excessive warming of scenes in SDR and over-cooling of the image in HDR disappeared. However, it's worth analysing the brightness characteristics more closely. While in SDR content there are few complaints – the picture looks really good, especially in older films, TV programmes, or on YouTube – it performs much worse with HDR content. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests that everything is fine, but in practice (EOTF in films), the limitations of the actual construction become evident. This model tends to excessively brighten small parts of the frame, while in other situations, it darkens the entire scene too much. The effect of calibration is therefore undeniable, and in terms of colourimetry, ChooseTV C69K / Q6C gains a lot. Unfortunately, certain limitations arising from local dimming management simply cannot be bypassed.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.3/10

9.5/10

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Smoothness of tonal transitions

The television really handles colour blending well, and in most scenes it's hard to spot any imperfections. This is best showcased in the brighter parts of films, where tonal transitions look almost perfect, and the image is smooth and natural. Darker scenes are somewhat less impressive, where the characteristic banding can be seen. Fortunately, this isn't a flaw that stands out, and for most viewers, it will remain virtually unnoticeable.

In the C69K / Q6C model, the tonal transitions (between colours) are very smooth and it's difficult to notice any banding. The image appears natural, and any minor imperfections are only visible on bright test screens, and that only upon very close inspection. In everyday viewing, the effect is simply fantastic. It's safe to say that in this category, the C69K / Q6C performs exceptionally well.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

3/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
No
No

Smooth transition function

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Upscaling and digital image processing in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 are not among the model's strong points. One might expect that since the television was not designed to achieve record brightness levels, the manufacturer would have opted for a more robust processor and a set of features that would "enhance" lower quality images. Unfortunately – we were also met with significant disappointment here. On the plus side, it has reasonably decent upscaling, which handles HD content and boosts it to 4K in an acceptable manner. However, that is where the list of advantages ends. The television does not offer any features to improve tonal transitions or smooth out digital imperfections, so in most cases, we receive a raw image, exactly as we deliver it from an external source. On a large screen, this lack of support makes lower quality content look simply bland. An additional problem is the phenomenon of overscan. When watching older material, it happens that part of the image is cut off, which only intensifies the impression that Xiaomi has quite a bit of catching up to do in this category.

In terms of image scaling, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. Lower quality content is presented acceptably, and due to the lack of overscan issues, the image is displayed in full without any cropping. However, don’t expect miracles – materials of very low quality won’t gain a second life here, as the image processor has its limitations.

On thin lines and details, there is noticeable jaggedness, which reveals the lack of more advanced image enhancement algorithms. It's also a shame that the C69K / Q6C lacks a feature for smoothing tonal transitions. As a result, in older films or video materials, color banding can be visible and may become distracting during extended viewing.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.5/10

7.3/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
BFI function 120Hz
No
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (1440p@120Hz):

Blur ():

The motion fluidity in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is an interesting compromise that results from the hybrid matrix used here. At a native resolution of 4K, the maximum refresh rate is 60 Hz – sufficient for those who mainly watch movies and series. It is with them in mind that the manufacturer added a motion smoother, allowing users to adjust the image to their own preferences – one can opt for greater fluidity or leave it with more "cinematic" frames depending on the settings.

The use of a 144 Hz panel in TCL C69K / Q6C is a significant advantage in this price range. This represents an important step forward compared to its predecessor (C655 PRO), which only offered 60 Hz at 4K. The difference is particularly noticeable when watching sports or gaming – the ball, players, and dynamic action in games are displayed more clearly and without losing detail. An interesting feature is also the panel's ability to operate at 240 Hz (which the manufacturer does not officially mention) – we will revisit this topic in relation to the PC gaming mode. TCL has also added a feature for movie fans: “Motion Clarity.” This allows users to adjust the picture to their own preferences using two simple sliders. We can either leave the visible film frame or opt for a very smooth one, "

Console compatibility and gaming features

3.6/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    No
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 240Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

No indeed – since Xiaomi has added the "Game Boost 120 Hz" feature here, one might expect that they'd follow up with a solid gaming package. Unfortunately, reality quickly dampens that enthusiasm. Aside from this mode (which, it must be said, is a great addition in a budget build), we only have a rather peculiar player panel. It's hard to call it a full-fledged "game bar" – it's more of a simple overlay on the TV's Menu with limited options. And that’s about it. There’s no ALLM, so the TV won’t switch to game mode automatically. There’s no VRR, so you can forget about smooth frame synchronisation. We also won’t find support for Dolby Vision in games or the HGiG format, which are increasingly becoming the standard on consoles. In short: apart from Game Boost 120 Hz, which indeed allows for a more enjoyable experience at 1080p or 1440p, Xiaomi A Pro 2026 offers nothing that particularly appeals to gamers.

TCL C69K / Q6C is a television that can confidently be called equipment designed for gamers. Here we have 4K at 144 Hz, VRR support, automatic game mode (ALLM), and Dolby Vision Gaming. Additionally, there's a practical Game Bar, which is a panel with the most important settings within easy reach – handy when we want to change something quickly during gameplay (e.g., aspect ratio: Yes, it can be done!). The wide range of VRR, reaching up to 240 Hz, is noteworthy. However, this option is mainly for PC gamers looking to go below native 4K resolution. In this case, the television can spread its wings and show additional smoothness, particularly in fast e-sport titles. For consoles, we stick to the standard limit of 120 Hz, but even so, the possibilities are truly extensive. The only minor criticism is slight ghosting that can sometimes be seen in dynamic scenes. Other than that, C69K / Q6C offers everything gamers expect from a television.

Input lag

9.5/10

9.7/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
18 ms
1080p120
8 ms
10 ms
2160p60
25 ms
18 ms
2160p120
10 ms

HDR

2160p60
25 ms
17 ms
2160p120
11 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
17 ms
2160p120 DV
9 ms

Input lag on the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is quite decent and definitely isn't its weak point. The best results were achieved in 1080p@120 Hz and 1440p@120 Hz modes – there the TV drops below 10 ms, which can easily be called a phenomenal result and sufficient even for more demanding gamers. The situation changes with 60 Hz content – input lag then increases to around 25 ms. These might not be the best figures on the market, but for casual gaming or firing up the console in the evening, they will be fully acceptable. Especially since in most cases, it’s worth activating the 120 Hz mode, which is the most beneficial for gamers.

In terms of input lag, TCL C69K / Q6C performs remarkably well. With 120 Hz content, the delay is around 10 ms, and at times even less. This is a level where the response is practically instantaneous, and it's hard to find any complaints. For 60 Hz materials, the result is around 18 ms – still a very good result, completely sufficient for comfortable gaming.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
25ms
11ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Compatibility with PC
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Compatibility with PC

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 as a computer monitor? There's no beating around the bush – it’s very poor. While you can still utilise the 120 Hz mode in lower resolutions for gaming, the TV is completely unsuitable for everyday work. It lacks full support for chroma 4:4:4, so fonts appear blurred, and sometimes even rainbow-like. Additionally, there's strong dithering, which makes the image look uneven – some pixels shine brighter while others dimmer, and vertical lines can even break apart. In practice, this means that text (especially coloured and on dark backgrounds) becomes difficult to read. Light text manages to hold up somewhat, but it’s hard to talk about any real comfort. In this category, we give the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 a score of 2/10 (+1 for the additional high refresh rate mode), and there’s really no sense in elaborating on this further.

As a computer monitor, TCL C69K / Q6C performs excellently. At its native resolution, we achieve 4K at 144 Hz, and by lowering the resolution, it can even reach up to 240 Hz. The TV also works with Nvidia and AMD cards, supporting both G-Sync and FreeSync. For office work, there are also very few complaints. Thanks to 4:4:4 chroma support, the fonts are sharp and readable, and any minor imperfections are so small that in everyday use they remain unnoticed.

Viewing angles

3/10

3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
63%
78%

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 features a VA panel, which immediately suggests that viewing angles are not its strong suit. When looking at the screen from the side, you will quickly notice a loss of quality – colours noticeably fade, and the whole image appears washed out. The drop in brightness may not be as drastic as in some constructions based on similar technology, but that doesn’t change the fact that it’s clearly a weak point of this model. If we plan to use it as a large, cheap screen for the lounge, one must take this limitation into account.

In the TCL C69K / Q6C, the viewing angles are typical for a VA panel. When sitting directly in front, the picture looks very good, but any shift to the side results in a noticeable drop in colour saturation and brightness. The difference is especially visible in colourful scenes – the hues become washed out, and the contrast loses its depth. Compared to IPS panels, this is a clearly weaker result, although the better black levels and higher native contrast remain a compensation.

Daytime performance

4.9/10

6.4/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Daytime performance
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Daytime performance
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Daytime performance
Review TCL C69K / Q6C Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

TCL C69K / Q6C: 532 cd/m2

XIAOMI A PRO 2026: 334 cd/m2

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 performs quite well during the day. The display has a satin finish that helps reduce reflections, so colours don’t lose their vibrancy, even when the room is bright. Just bear in mind that it’s not an extremely bright screen – the average brightness is around 350 nits. In an ordinary, moderately sunny living room, it’s sufficient, but if you have large windows that let in a lot of sunlight, it might simply be tough without blinds or curtains.

In bright lighting conditions, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. The panel offers decent brightness (around 550 nits in SDR materials), which allows for comfortable TV viewing in an average lit living room, even on days when strong light comes in through the windows. As a result, daytime screenings do not require complete room blackout. We also appreciate the fact that the screen coating does quite well in reducing reflections, so the TV doesn't become a "mirror" even in strong light. However, this is not on the level of top models with more advanced anti-reflective coatings – in very challenging conditions (e.g., with large windows), reflections will be visible.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
UKN1.240806.017.V816.0.25.5.13.621.4.URTMIXM
V8-T653T01-LF1V531.002396
Image processor
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1530 MHz
MT5896 2,5GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV Panel details
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV Panel details

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

TCL C69K / Q6C

TV features

6.1/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features
Review TCL C69K / Q6C TV features

SmartTV- Google TV

The biggest plus of the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the Google TV system. It gives the television a second life – you can run almost any app on it, from Netflix and YouTube to music services and even lesser-known programs from the Google Play store. We are not limited to what the manufacturer has pre-installed, as is often the case with other budget televisions. On top of that, we have AirPlay, voice search via Google Assistant, and even integration with Gemini. We did experience some small hiccups – for instance, screen mirroring from a laptop didn’t always work – but despite these shortcomings, Google TV is a huge advantage of this model.

Classic TV functions

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 can be described as a "senior-friendly" television. The large remote with a numeric keypad and a considerable number of physical buttons makes it intuitive to operate. Support for teletext and a clear EPG interface make it easy to use classic television functions. We won’t find many advanced features like USB recording or PiP functionality, but the presence of an analogue headphone jack output can be surprisingly practical for some users. It gives the impression that this is a set of features tailored to the needs of the most traditional viewers.

System stability

However, not everything works as it should. During testing, we encountered annoying system lags, issues with Miracast, and problems when switching audio sources. There were times when a reset of the television was necessary by unplugging it from the power. This only shows that while Google TV offers enormous possibilities, the stability can still be very problematic in such a budget-friendly model.

Multimedia Features: Google TV

The Google TV system is undoubtedly the strongest user feature of TCL C69K / Q6C. It gives the television character and provides an advantage over many competitors. We receive a full suite of services: from support for popular streaming applications to support for screen mirroring and AirPlay (allowing iPhone users to feel right at home). Additionally, there’s Google Assistant, now in the Gemini AI version, which not only answers questions but also efficiently carries out simple commands (e.g. changing channels or searching for content in VOD). The system itself operates quite responsively. However, we cannot overlook a certain drawback: the awkward translations in the Polish menu can bring a smile, but sometimes require a moment of thought to decipher their meaning.

Classic Features

In terms of classic television features, TCL C69K / Q6C performs rather mediocrely. There’s no USB recording or PiP mode, which may disappoint some users. However, the manufacturer hasn’t forgotten the basics: teletext television and a clear EPG are available, which still matter to some viewers. Daily use is also aided by Bluetooth support for external audio devices. This is a simple way to connect, for example, a speaker or headphones, which can be a practical solution for seniors. Beyond this, it is difficult to find elements that would distinguish C69K / Q6C from its rivals – it is simply a solid but standard package of basic features.

Playing files from USB

6.8/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is quite a conundrum. On one hand, it plays most popular audio and video formats without major issues. On the other hand, it can struggle with basic things like Polish characters. Files with letters such as ą, ł, ć, or ś in the name often refuse to open or display incorrectly. It looks strange, because we supposedly have codec support, yet the TV simply gets lost on straightforward matters related to the alphabet. Fortunately, this isn’t a huge problem, as thanks to Google TV we can simply install another player, like VLC. At that point, the issue with Polish characters totally disappears and media usage becomes seamless.

The built-in media player in TCL C69K / Q6C performs really well – practically all popular file formats work without major issues. There are indeed a few minor exceptions, particularly with less common codecs or unusual video file configurations, but in everyday use, this is rarely noticeable. The biggest plus, however, is that the TV runs on Google TV, which provides complete freedom in choosing additional software. If someone encounters a file that the standard player cannot handle, it's enough to install an alternative – such as VLC – and the problem disappears.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

5/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Last year, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 surprised us with its pretty decent sound for a super budget segment television. Unfortunately, this year's edition – the A Pro 2026, has completely let us down. The sound feels like it's coming from underwater: flat, lacking any bass or depth. The only positive is the wide support for audio formats like Dolby Atmos and DTS:X, but in practice, it doesn't really change much. If you're considering this television, you'll need to factor in a soundbar straight away, as the audio experience without it will be quite disappointing.

In terms of audio, TCL C69K / Q6C performs quite well. The manufacturer has been boasting about its collaboration with the Onkyo brand for several years, and this does reflect in the sound quality. The sound is pleasant, with clear mid-tones and a fairly clean high end, giving an overall impression of being well-balanced. Of course, it won't replace a full-fledged soundbar, especially regarding bass depth, but for built-in speakers in a TV from this price segment – it's really quite good.

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data