XIAOMI A PRO 2026 vs Philips PUS7000

Direct comparison

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

5.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.0

    4.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.7

    5.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.7

    4.9

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    6.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    5.8

  • Watching in bright light

    4.9

    3.5

  • Utility functions

    6.1

    5.0

  • Apps

    9.6

    6.7

  • Sound quality

    5.0

    5.8

Advantages

  • VA panel with good native contrast and decent blacks

  • Supports Game Boost mode at 120 Hz in 1080p and 1440p

  • Low input lag in 120 Hz mode

  • Google TV – vast selection of apps and services

  • Wide colour gamut coverage (around 94% DCI-P3)

  • Good colours after calibration in SDR mode

  • Supports popular audio formats (Dolby Atmos, DTS:X)

  • Large, easy-to-read remote with numeric keypad – convenient for seniors

  • Attractive price

  • High contrast VA panel

  • Very low input lag

  • Gaming features – presence of VRR, ALLM, and a dedicated Game Bar

  • Supports HDR10+

  • Quite decent image processing (for such a cheap TV)

  • Good readability of fonts – suitable as a large monitor

  • Backlit remote with numeric keypad

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Lack of real support for HDR10+ and other more advanced HDR formats (e.g., Dolby Vision)

  • Significant limitations when working with PC – no chroma 4:4:4, heavy dithering, poor font readability

  • Poor viewing angles (typical for VA)

  • Clunky build, legs mounted in plastic with screws

  • Weird system issues – stuttering, errors with Miracast and sound switching

  • Upscaling and digital image processing is virtually non-existent

  • Very weak sound, practically no bass (we felt it performed worse than the "2025" model)

  • Very low brightness – 200 nits

  • No Ambilight

  • Lack of any features to improve fluidity makes the image feel very "raw"

  • Titan OS system – the interface is slow, lacking many popular applications

  • The remote works on infrared

Our verdict

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television that, at first glance, doesn’t reveal significant changes compared to its predecessor. Someone might even think it’s just a copy of last year's model with a different sticker. And there’s some truth to that, as the main novelty, or rather the only noticeable difference, is the 120 Hz mode at lower resolutions. It must be said that Xiaomi has done well here; this addition really makes a difference – it’s not a solution for professional gamers, but a nod towards those looking for a smoother image during casual gaming. This is where the A Pro 2026 can stand out – with a simple yet clever idea that sets it apart in the “super budget” segment. Unfortunately, when we start looking at the television more broadly, the enthusiasm quickly wanes. Even though the year has changed on the calendar, most of the issues known from the A Pro 2025 are still with us – the system can still experience strange stutters, and the occasional errors can be quite frustrating. On top of that, there's a lack of any serious digital image processing tools, which worked quite decently last year. As a result, there are many limitations in the design that the competition in a similar price range is already trying to cover up in some way. When it comes to image quality, we won't sugarcoat it either. Brightness at the level of 200–300 nits doesn’t stand a chance against more demanding content. Sure, with simpler streaming content, you can watch something, but with high-budget productions, it’s immediately clear why the television costs what it does. The impression that we are viewing a flat image stripped of details accompanies us pretty much every time. And this brings us to the crux of the matter. The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television for those who really don’t demand much. As a daily screen for series, news, or YouTube, it performs decently, especially thanks to its operating system, which is GoogleTV. Also, if someone is looking for budget equipment and would additionally like a taste of smoother gameplay in games thanks to the 120 Hz mode, they might even be satisfied. However, anyone expecting at least average image quality, a stable system, and proper functionality will soon notice that there are other budget models on the market that simply perform better.

If you're looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, the price is pretty much it. This model is primarily meant to be cheap, and it fulfills that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally upgrade to 4K without emptying the wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget 60 Hz" model, Philips hasn't forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which realistically improve the gaming experience when connected to a console and make everything quite responsive. But... indeed. The biggest problem with this TV is its brightness, or rather the lack thereof. 200 nits is a figure that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The picture will be pale and not very clear despite the fact that it features a high-contrast VA panel. HDR is essentially just a label on the box here. With such a dim panel, HDR materials look artificial and simply lack the necessary punch, so it's better to forget about them and stick to standard SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 doesn’t drastically stand out from the other budget screens. The question is whether you'll get along with the Titan OS system, which is still a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard with competitors. Given today's prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are churning out QLEDs and Mini-LEDs like there’s no tomorrow, the Philips PUS7000 faces a really tough battle. If you value the logo of a well-known brand and a low price: you can go ahead. However, if you’re looking for picture quality... it’s better to double-check your budget before making a purchase.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Budget
Average
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.1/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,000:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,550:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,600:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,900:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

One of the biggest advantages of even a budget construction like the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the VA panel it uses. This is responsible for quite decent contrast, which in our measurements oscillated between 5000:1 and 7000:1. On the screen, this translates to a stable image with fairly deep blacks – something that's hard to find in competing models with IPS panels without local dimming. Xiaomi has also added a global dimming function for the entire panel. It sounds good, but… we advise turning it off straight away. Why? Because the screen behaves very strangely in darker scenes – sometimes it dims so much that you can hardly see anything, and other times it brightens so much that the already dark blue-black turns into a bright blue. At those moments, it felt as if the TV was simply damaged. Fortunately, without this function, the contrast looks really solid. It’s definitely not on the level of advanced TVs with local dimming, but in its price range, it will easily satisfy most users – especially if you’re not watching in a completely dark room and have at least some background light that effectively masks the imperfections of the "blue-black".

The model PUS7000 we tested, measuring 55 inches, is equipped with a VA panel. This is crucial for black quality, as in such budget constructions, we won't find local dimming systems that could assist the screen in dark scenes. Therefore, all the work relies on the panel itself, which, thanks to its characteristics, offers decent contrast at a level of 6000:1. In practice, this translates to significantly better experiences during evening viewings compared to competing TVs with IPS panels. The blacks here are better separated from bright elements, so dark parts of the image don’t appear washed out, and details in the shadows remain visible. However, it’s worth noting that with completely turned off lights, the black may slightly lean towards shades of navy blue and won't be as perfectly “pitch-black” as in more expensive models. To mitigate this effect and improve the perception of depth, it’s advisable to watch the TV with some light, additional illumination in the room. Usually, this problem was somewhat resolved by the well-known Ambilight system in Philips TVs, which optically increases contrast through the glow on the wall. Unfortunately, in the PUS7000 model, the manufacturer opted to seek savings, which is why we won’t find this lighting system here, which is standard in higher series like PUS8000.

HDR effect quality

4.1/10

3.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.6%, Bt.2020: 71.7%
DCI P3: 78.3%, Bt.2020: 57.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

248 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

322 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

315 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

326 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

197 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

209 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PUS7000

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

If you're counting on the cinematic HDR experience in the new Xiaomi A Pro 2026, it's best to temper your expectations. This TV is simply too dim to fully realise the potential of contemporary films or series designed for the highest quality image. Our measurements showed brightness levels in the range of 200–300 nits, which are values that are more suited to SDR content than to ambitious HDR productions. In practice, this means that while most films look decent, they certainly won't evoke the 'wow' effect that other TVs do. Fortunately, not everything is lost – credit has to be given to the PFS LED filter used here, a solution similar to the quantum dot technology found in QLEDs. Thanks to this, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette reaches about 94%, resulting in vibrant, saturated colours in the vast majority of materials.

Unfortunately, the PUS7000 is not suitable for watching HDR content. This screen is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is insufficient to display this format correctly. Even if a HDR signal message appears on the screen, the image will resemble a standard SDR recording. Therefore, it’s better to stick with the latter format to avoid errors in displaying bright scenes, as you will read below. The situation is worsened by the fact that this is a classic LCD model without additional layers that improve colours, such as QLED or PFS. As a result, colours in HDR may seem washed out. Ultimately, this provides a worse effect than in the standard SDR format, which is simply better suited to the capabilities of this panel.

Factory color reproduction

3.5/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

What we saw in Filmmaker mode really surprised us – and unfortunately not in a good way. The mode advertised as the Hollywood standard resembled more of a display in a shop window. The white balance was shifted towards blue, which led to massive colour errors and the effect of blown-out scenes in SDR content. It was a bit better, though far from perfect, in HDR materials. There were also problems there – colour saturation and the entire palette consistently drifted towards cooler tones, resulting in an image that had an artificial, cold tint rather than a cinematic character. In other words: even in Filmmaker mode, which should be the showcase of this television, we got an effect far from expectations.

We tested the television in movie mode, which theoretically should provide the best and most natural colours. And indeed, this mode is quite correct; however, when we connected the calibration equipment, its biggest flaw became apparent. The PUS7000 has significant shortcomings in displaying reds. Poorly tuned white balance and too low saturation of this colour cause the image to appear too cool. As a result, one might get the impression that the displayed content lacks vibrant colours. The situation is worsened by the fact that both SDR and HDR content are excessively brightened. This is confirmed by the gamma curve and EOTF graphs, which show that the television displays the image brighter than it should. This causes scenes to lose their depth and can make them seem slightly washed out. Fortunately, in the Philips menu, we find plenty of features to improve these aspects, so we immediately proceeded to calibration to see what we could extract from this screen.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Even though Xiaomi isn't a brand associated with top-tier televisions, it's fair to say that even in a budget model like the A Pro 2026, the manufacturer left plenty of calibration settings. After a few adjustments, the SDR picture took on a completely new look. The colours stopped veering into blue tones, the whites gained a sense of naturalness, and most errors dropped to a practically invisible level. As a result, SDR content looked very good, surprisingly so for this price range.

It was a slightly different story with HDR materials. Here, it was immediately noticeable what we had already mentioned – the overexposure of bright scenes and issues with balance control. Calibration helped only partially, as the limitations of the panel itself were at play. However, it must be emphasized that in the case of SDR, the television changed beyond recognition, and definitely for the better.

After professional calibration, it’s evident that the PUS7000 responds well to image adjustments. In this price range, that’s not a given. The effects are best evaluated in two scenarios, depending on the content we plan to watch. SDR performs the best. After our adjustments, the image looks really good. Most colour errors have dropped below level 3, which is the threshold at which discrepancies usually become visible to the naked eye. Movies, series, sports, and regular television present naturally, without unpleasant deviations. If someone mainly watches classic channels or streams in HD quality, the difference after calibration will be noticeable straight away. However, it must be said clearly that the PUS7000 is still not a television suited for proper HDR, and calibration doesn't change much in this regard. The reason lies in the hardware: colours remain too unsaturated. The television lacks solutions that widen the colour gamut, such as PFS filters or a quantum dot layer, so the panel simply cannot display the intense colours required by HDR. This is most evident in reds, which still look washed out. This limitation cannot be circumvented through menu settings, as it stems from the design of the backlighting and the panel itself.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.3/10

6/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The television really handles colour blending well, and in most scenes it's hard to spot any imperfections. This is best showcased in the brighter parts of films, where tonal transitions look almost perfect, and the image is smooth and natural. Darker scenes are somewhat less impressive, where the characteristic banding can be seen. Fortunately, this isn't a flaw that stands out, and for most viewers, it will remain virtually unnoticeable.

When it comes to colour gradation in bright scenes, the PUS7000 model performs surprisingly well. It's hard to have any major complaints here. The colour transitions are natural and smooth, which means there are no disturbing bands or jumps between shades on a bright background. During the viewing of cheerful scenes, nothing should distract your attention from the screen. However, the situation changes dramatically when darker shades of grey or simply very dark colours appear on the screen. Unfortunately, quite strong "banding" of colours becomes noticeable then. Instead of smooth transitions, we get distinct breaks between the individual tones. In dark, atmospheric films, this can be quite annoying and detract from the viewing experience, as the tonal transitions are not as clean as in the bright areas of the image.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

3/10

6.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Upscaling and digital image processing in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 are not among the model's strong points. One might expect that since the television was not designed to achieve record brightness levels, the manufacturer would have opted for a more robust processor and a set of features that would "enhance" lower quality images. Unfortunately – we were also met with significant disappointment here. On the plus side, it has reasonably decent upscaling, which handles HD content and boosts it to 4K in an acceptable manner. However, that is where the list of advantages ends. The television does not offer any features to improve tonal transitions or smooth out digital imperfections, so in most cases, we receive a raw image, exactly as we deliver it from an external source. On a large screen, this lack of support makes lower quality content look simply bland. An additional problem is the phenomenon of overscan. When watching older material, it happens that part of the image is cut off, which only intensifies the impression that Xiaomi has quite a bit of catching up to do in this category.

The PUS7000 handles digital image processing quite well. The distortion reduction feature deserves praise, as it effectively smooths unwanted tonal transitions even at a low setting. However, it has its downside: with too aggressive operation, it can introduce undesirable artifacts on the screen. It would be a good idea to experiment with this setting to find the golden mean between a smooth image and the clarity of details.

The upscaling, or enhancing the quality of lower materials to 4K, is decent. The image after processing is very "soft," which is typical of almost all Philips TVs. The edges are plastic and smooth, making the image look cohesive. If someone finds it too soft, it can always be adjusted with the sharpness slider in the menu for a more pronounced effect.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.5/10

3.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
No
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (1440p@120Hz):

Blur ():

The motion fluidity in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is an interesting compromise that results from the hybrid matrix used here. At a native resolution of 4K, the maximum refresh rate is 60 Hz – sufficient for those who mainly watch movies and series. It is with them in mind that the manufacturer added a motion smoother, allowing users to adjust the image to their own preferences – one can opt for greater fluidity or leave it with more "cinematic" frames depending on the settings.

In this regard, we actually have no good news. It might seem that the biggest downside is the lack of a 120 Hz panel, but in this price range, that's actually the norm, and it's hard to expect more. However, the worst part is that the television has no motion smoothing features. There are no supporting systems in place for either movies or sports. We have to come to terms with the fact that the image on the PUS7000 is processed "raw." This means that during dynamic scenes or fast camera movements, motion can appear choppy or unclear. We have no option to enable any smoothers that could alleviate this effect.

Console compatibility and gaming features

3.6/10

4.7/10

  • ALLM
    No
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

No indeed – since Xiaomi has added the "Game Boost 120 Hz" feature here, one might expect that they'd follow up with a solid gaming package. Unfortunately, reality quickly dampens that enthusiasm. Aside from this mode (which, it must be said, is a great addition in a budget build), we only have a rather peculiar player panel. It's hard to call it a full-fledged "game bar" – it's more of a simple overlay on the TV's Menu with limited options. And that’s about it. There’s no ALLM, so the TV won’t switch to game mode automatically. There’s no VRR, so you can forget about smooth frame synchronisation. We also won’t find support for Dolby Vision in games or the HGiG format, which are increasingly becoming the standard on consoles. In short: apart from Game Boost 120 Hz, which indeed allows for a more enjoyable experience at 1080p or 1440p, Xiaomi A Pro 2026 offers nothing that particularly appeals to gamers.

Even though the PUS7000 isn’t marketed as a gaming TV, it doesn't perform as poorly in this category as one might expect. True, it doesn't support 120 Hz refresh rates, which is understandable at this price point, but the manufacturer has included several important features that significantly improve the console gaming experience. The most important of these are VRR and ALLM technologies. VRR is responsible for synchronising the screen with the number of frames generated by the console. This means the image doesn't "tear" and remains consistent even during sudden drops in frame rates while playing. On the other hand, ALLM is a solution that automatically switches the TV to a mode with the lowest latency immediately after detecting a signal from the console. All these parameters are easily accessible thanks to the Game Bar feature. This is a special control panel for gamers that can be brought up on the screen at any time. It allows for a quick view of current settings and connection status without interrupting gameplay, which is a very convenient solution.

Input lag

9.5/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
12 ms
1080p120
8 ms
2160p60
25 ms
12 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
25 ms
13 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Input lag on the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is quite decent and definitely isn't its weak point. The best results were achieved in 1080p@120 Hz and 1440p@120 Hz modes – there the TV drops below 10 ms, which can easily be called a phenomenal result and sufficient even for more demanding gamers. The situation changes with 60 Hz content – input lag then increases to around 25 ms. These might not be the best figures on the market, but for casual gaming or firing up the console in the evening, they will be fully acceptable. Especially since in most cases, it’s worth activating the 120 Hz mode, which is the most beneficial for gamers.

Another plus for gamers is the very low input lag at around 12 ms. In this price range, the result is impressive. The delay is so minimal that the response to controller movements feels instantaneous, and in practice, it’s hard to notice at all. Gaming remains comfortable even in fast, dynamic titles where every millisecond counts. In this respect, the PUS7000 can keep up with much more expensive televisions.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

5.8/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
25ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 as a computer monitor? There's no beating around the bush – it’s very poor. While you can still utilise the 120 Hz mode in lower resolutions for gaming, the TV is completely unsuitable for everyday work. It lacks full support for chroma 4:4:4, so fonts appear blurred, and sometimes even rainbow-like. Additionally, there's strong dithering, which makes the image look uneven – some pixels shine brighter while others dimmer, and vertical lines can even break apart. In practice, this means that text (especially coloured and on dark backgrounds) becomes difficult to read. Light text manages to hold up somewhat, but it’s hard to talk about any real comfort. In this category, we give the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 a score of 2/10 (+1 for the additional high refresh rate mode), and there’s really no sense in elaborating on this further.

When it comes to connecting a computer, the possibilities for gaming are quite limited. The screen supports a maximum of 60 Hz and does not offer G-Sync technology, so it’s not equipment for demanding PC gamers. However, the PUS7000 surprisingly performs well for text work. The readability of fonts is at a very high level. The television correctly handles 4:4:4 chroma subsampling. This means that each letter, regardless of its size or colour, is displayed sharply and without any distortion on the edges. As a result, office work or browsing the internet on this screen is simply comfortable and doesn’t strain the eyes like some cheap panels that struggle with clean font rendering.

Viewing angles

3/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
63%
70%

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 features a VA panel, which immediately suggests that viewing angles are not its strong suit. When looking at the screen from the side, you will quickly notice a loss of quality – colours noticeably fade, and the whole image appears washed out. The drop in brightness may not be as drastic as in some constructions based on similar technology, but that doesn’t change the fact that it’s clearly a weak point of this model. If we plan to use it as a large, cheap screen for the lounge, one must take this limitation into account.

The viewing angles on this model are weak, which is directly due to the use of a VA-type panel. Although this panel provides decent contrast, as I mentioned earlier, it has one major flaw: it requires you to sit directly in front of the screen. Just shifting slightly to the side is enough for the colours to start losing saturation, and the image becomes noticeably worse.

Daytime performance

4.9/10

3.5/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Philips PUS7000: 202 cd/m2

XIAOMI A PRO 2026: 334 cd/m2

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 performs quite well during the day. The display has a satin finish that helps reduce reflections, so colours don’t lose their vibrancy, even when the room is bright. Just bear in mind that it’s not an extremely bright screen – the average brightness is around 350 nits. In an ordinary, moderately sunny living room, it’s sufficient, but if you have large windows that let in a lot of sunlight, it might simply be tough without blinds or curtains.

In a sunny room, the PUS7000 performs poorly. This is due to the fact that the display is simply too dim. A brightness level of 200 nits is very low, which does not allow for comfortable viewing in a lot of daylight. On the plus side, the satin screen coating does a decent job of reducing reflections. Thanks to this, reflections are not overly noticeable on the display, but it's not enough to save the situation. The brightness of this model is too low to cut through strong sunlight, so in very bright rooms, the image will simply be quite unclear.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
White LED
Software version during testing
UKN1.240806.017.V816.0.25.5.13.621.4.URTMIXM
TPN256E_V056.002.236.141
Image processor
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1530 MHz

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

Philips PUS7000

TV features

6.1/10

5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features

SmartTV- Google TV

The biggest plus of the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the Google TV system. It gives the television a second life – you can run almost any app on it, from Netflix and YouTube to music services and even lesser-known programs from the Google Play store. We are not limited to what the manufacturer has pre-installed, as is often the case with other budget televisions. On top of that, we have AirPlay, voice search via Google Assistant, and even integration with Gemini. We did experience some small hiccups – for instance, screen mirroring from a laptop didn’t always work – but despite these shortcomings, Google TV is a huge advantage of this model.

Classic TV functions

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 can be described as a "senior-friendly" television. The large remote with a numeric keypad and a considerable number of physical buttons makes it intuitive to operate. Support for teletext and a clear EPG interface make it easy to use classic television functions. We won’t find many advanced features like USB recording or PiP functionality, but the presence of an analogue headphone jack output can be surprisingly practical for some users. It gives the impression that this is a set of features tailored to the needs of the most traditional viewers.

System stability

However, not everything works as it should. During testing, we encountered annoying system lags, issues with Miracast, and problems when switching audio sources. There were times when a reset of the television was necessary by unplugging it from the power. This only shows that while Google TV offers enormous possibilities, the stability can still be very problematic in such a budget-friendly model.

Titan OS System

Titan OS is still a fairly new operating system, and unfortunately, this is noticeable in everyday use. The whole system operates sluggishly, at times even clumsily. The response to commands from the remote is slow, which is further complicated by the fact that the device uses infrared connectivity instead of Bluetooth / RF. This means we need to aim the remote fairly precisely at the television for the system to respond at all. During testing, we again failed to launch the screen mirroring feature with computers running Windows. Fortunately, transmitting video from Apple devices via AirPlay worked without any issues. Another downside of Titan OS is its very modest app library. The selection is much smaller than in systems like webOS or Tizen, not to mention Google TV, where the choice of programs is almost unlimited.

Classic Features

On the other hand, the PUS7000 might be a good choice for people who primarily watch traditional television. Here, we find a properly functioning teletext and a clear EPG interface, which is an electronic program guide. The remote included is backlit, which makes it very handy to use after dark, and it features standard numeric buttons for quick channel selection. An interesting addition is the presence of a classic jack headphone input. This is a rarely seen feature in new televisions, allowing for the connection of older home theatre systems or wired headphones without the need to purchase adapters.

Apps

9.6/10

6.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

6.8/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is quite a conundrum. On one hand, it plays most popular audio and video formats without major issues. On the other hand, it can struggle with basic things like Polish characters. Files with letters such as ą, ł, ć, or ś in the name often refuse to open or display incorrectly. It looks strange, because we supposedly have codec support, yet the TV simply gets lost on straightforward matters related to the alphabet. Fortunately, this isn’t a huge problem, as thanks to Google TV we can simply install another player, like VLC. At that point, the issue with Polish characters totally disappears and media usage becomes seamless.

The built-in media player works quite well and handles most popular video formats without any major issues. The television easily reads subtitles from files and manages various audio formats, so those who keep movies on a drive or USB shouldn't feel restricted. The only hitch concerns the photo browser – not everything worked properly, and some files, especially in selected resolutions, did not open at all.

Sound

5/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Last year, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 surprised us with its pretty decent sound for a super budget segment television. Unfortunately, this year's edition – the A Pro 2026, has completely let us down. The sound feels like it's coming from underwater: flat, lacking any bass or depth. The only positive is the wide support for audio formats like Dolby Atmos and DTS:X, but in practice, it doesn't really change much. If you're considering this television, you'll need to factor in a soundbar straight away, as the audio experience without it will be quite disappointing.

The sound is pretty much at a budget level. It's sufficient for news and talk shows, but with films and music, it quickly lacks depth and bass. At this price, it's hard to expect much more, so if we’re after better experiences, it’s worth considering a soundbar or connecting external audio, even just through the headphone jack.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC