XIAOMI A PRO 2026 vs LG NANO81A / NANO80A

Direct comparison

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

5.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.0

    5.1

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.7

    5.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.7

    5.4

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    6.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.9

    4.0

  • Utility functions

    6.1

    6.6

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    5.0

    6.2

Advantages

  • VA panel with good native contrast and decent blacks

  • Supports Game Boost mode at 120 Hz in 1080p and 1440p

  • Low input lag in 120 Hz mode

  • Google TV – vast selection of apps and services

  • Wide colour gamut coverage (around 94% DCI-P3)

  • Good colours after calibration in SDR mode

  • Supports popular audio formats (Dolby Atmos, DTS:X)

  • Large, easy-to-read remote with numeric keypad – convenient for seniors

  • Wide viewing angles (IPS panel)

  • Very low input lag (around 10-12 ms)

  • Smooth webOS 2025 system

  • Intuitive Magic remote with pointer

  • Better colour gamut coverage thanks to NanoCell filter

  • Excellent as a PC monitor (sharp fonts, Chroma 4:4:4)

  • Decent features for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG)

  • Extensive calibration options and natural colours after adjustments

  • Good image processing and efficient scaling of older content

  • Noticeable low-frequency boost in sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Lack of real support for HDR10+ and other more advanced HDR formats (e.g., Dolby Vision)

  • Significant limitations when working with PC – no chroma 4:4:4, heavy dithering, poor font readability

  • Poor viewing angles (typical for VA)

  • Clunky build, legs mounted in plastic with screws

  • Weird system issues – stuttering, errors with Miracast and sound switching

  • Upscaling and digital image processing is virtually non-existent

  • Very weak sound, practically no bass (we felt it performed worse than the "2025" model)

  • Poor black level and low contrast

  • Low brightness (around 250 nits – weak for very bright rooms)

  • Only 60 Hz refresh rate

  • USB player does not support HEIC files and very large images (over 20 Mpix)

Our verdict

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television that, at first glance, doesn’t reveal significant changes compared to its predecessor. Someone might even think it’s just a copy of last year's model with a different sticker. And there’s some truth to that, as the main novelty, or rather the only noticeable difference, is the 120 Hz mode at lower resolutions. It must be said that Xiaomi has done well here; this addition really makes a difference – it’s not a solution for professional gamers, but a nod towards those looking for a smoother image during casual gaming. This is where the A Pro 2026 can stand out – with a simple yet clever idea that sets it apart in the “super budget” segment. Unfortunately, when we start looking at the television more broadly, the enthusiasm quickly wanes. Even though the year has changed on the calendar, most of the issues known from the A Pro 2025 are still with us – the system can still experience strange stutters, and the occasional errors can be quite frustrating. On top of that, there's a lack of any serious digital image processing tools, which worked quite decently last year. As a result, there are many limitations in the design that the competition in a similar price range is already trying to cover up in some way. When it comes to image quality, we won't sugarcoat it either. Brightness at the level of 200–300 nits doesn’t stand a chance against more demanding content. Sure, with simpler streaming content, you can watch something, but with high-budget productions, it’s immediately clear why the television costs what it does. The impression that we are viewing a flat image stripped of details accompanies us pretty much every time. And this brings us to the crux of the matter. The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is a television for those who really don’t demand much. As a daily screen for series, news, or YouTube, it performs decently, especially thanks to its operating system, which is GoogleTV. Also, if someone is looking for budget equipment and would additionally like a taste of smoother gameplay in games thanks to the 120 Hz mode, they might even be satisfied. However, anyone expecting at least average image quality, a stable system, and proper functionality will soon notice that there are other budget models on the market that simply perform better.

LG NANO81A is essentially a continuation of the NanoCell series, which has hardly changed over the past few years. Aside from a new operating system, a refreshed remote, and a few marketing add-ons, we are dealing with practically the same construction that we have known for years. Thanks to the nano-particle filter, the television can display better, cleaner colours than standard budget televisions, and the IPS panel ensures really decent viewing angles. Unfortunately, for these advantages, we pay the price of very poor blacks and low contrast, which is immediately noticeable during night screenings. Although webOS is still one of the best systems on the market, the biggest problem with the NANO81A is its price, which we simply do not understand. In 2025, this model has huge competition not only from brands like TCL and Hisense but... from LG itself. The model we tested earlier, QNED80A, is equipped with local dimming technology, has a brighter panel, and offers a wider colour palette. Interestingly, at the time of writing this review, the technically superior QNED80A is often much cheaper than the NANO81A. In this situation, the existence of the NanoCell model loses its meaning – unless your priority is solely wide viewing angles, but in our opinion, the price you have to pay for them (at the expense of terrible blacks and a higher cost) is simply too high.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Budget
Average
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Black
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.1/10

1.5/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,000:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,550:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,600:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

850:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

750:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

One of the biggest advantages of even a budget construction like the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the VA panel it uses. This is responsible for quite decent contrast, which in our measurements oscillated between 5000:1 and 7000:1. On the screen, this translates to a stable image with fairly deep blacks – something that's hard to find in competing models with IPS panels without local dimming. Xiaomi has also added a global dimming function for the entire panel. It sounds good, but… we advise turning it off straight away. Why? Because the screen behaves very strangely in darker scenes – sometimes it dims so much that you can hardly see anything, and other times it brightens so much that the already dark blue-black turns into a bright blue. At those moments, it felt as if the TV was simply damaged. Fortunately, without this function, the contrast looks really solid. It’s definitely not on the level of advanced TVs with local dimming, but in its price range, it will easily satisfy most users – especially if you’re not watching in a completely dark room and have at least some background light that effectively masks the imperfections of the "blue-black".

The NanoCell series, including the model NANO81 we tested, is based on an IPS panel. For anyone who's somewhat familiar with screens, this means one thing: huge problems with blacks and contrast. Our measurements here are merciless. A result of 800:1 is, to put it bluntly, a tragic outcome. In practice, this means that what should appear as deep black on the screen looks like a dark grey blob at night. Watching dark films or series in a completely dark room will simply be torture – the image loses all its depth and appears flat. If you do decide to go for this model, we have one key piece of advice for you: don’t watch it in total darkness. To salvage the situation somewhat, it's best to leave a gentle light on in the room, and the ideal solution would be to install LED strips behind the television. Such wall lighting will trick your eye (this is known as simultaneous contrast) and make that grey on the screen seem a bit darker. Nevertheless, the beginning of the test regarding cinematic experiences is looking grim.

HDR effect quality

4.1/10

3.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 93.6%, Bt.2020: 71.7%
DCI P3: 87.6%, Bt.2020: 65.3%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

248 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

322 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

315 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

326 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

168 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

252 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

If you're counting on the cinematic HDR experience in the new Xiaomi A Pro 2026, it's best to temper your expectations. This TV is simply too dim to fully realise the potential of contemporary films or series designed for the highest quality image. Our measurements showed brightness levels in the range of 200–300 nits, which are values that are more suited to SDR content than to ambitious HDR productions. In practice, this means that while most films look decent, they certainly won't evoke the 'wow' effect that other TVs do. Fortunately, not everything is lost – credit has to be given to the PFS LED filter used here, a solution similar to the quantum dot technology found in QLEDs. Thanks to this, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette reaches about 94%, resulting in vibrant, saturated colours in the vast majority of materials.

If you're hoping that HDR on the NANO81A will bring tears to your eyes, I have to disappoint you. This TV is just too dark to show what this format is really about. With a brightness of only 250 nits, HDR really only exists on paper here. In practice, during viewing, it's very hard to tell whether we're watching material in high dynamic range or regular SDR – it simply lacks that “punch” of light in the bright parts of the image. But, to balance out the criticism, we do have one light at the end of the tunnel – and quite a distinct one at that. It's about colour gamut coverage. Here, the NanoCell filter shows that it's not just marketing nonsense. Our measurements indicated that the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is around 88%. That's a really solid result, placing this model significantly above typical budget models based on regular white LEDs without any filters. Of course, it still lags a bit behind QLED TVs or advanced panels with PFS filters, but for this price range, the colours are surprisingly saturated and vibrant. It’s just a shame that this low brightness doesn't allow them to fully “spread their wings” with the Nano filter.

Factory color reproduction

3.5/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

What we saw in Filmmaker mode really surprised us – and unfortunately not in a good way. The mode advertised as the Hollywood standard resembled more of a display in a shop window. The white balance was shifted towards blue, which led to massive colour errors and the effect of blown-out scenes in SDR content. It was a bit better, though far from perfect, in HDR materials. There were also problems there – colour saturation and the entire palette consistently drifted towards cooler tones, resulting in an image that had an artificial, cold tint rather than a cinematic character. In other words: even in Filmmaker mode, which should be the showcase of this television, we got an effect far from expectations.

For every film fan, the natural choice in LG televisions is the Filmmaker Mode. It is designed to show the image as the director intended – without unnecessary "enhancements". Unfortunately, in the case of our test unit NANO81A, the factory settings left a bit to be desired. The main issue turned out to be the white balance. Measurements revealed a distinct deficiency of blue, which in practice meant that many scenes had a slightly yellowish, even "yellowed" tint. The white wasn’t perfectly clean, which took away the freshness of the image. Additionally, the brightness management wasn't perfect either – the factory-set gamma was too low. The image often appeared oversaturated, as if it had been pulled too much from the shadows, which detracted from its naturalness and depth. Fortunately, LG, even in this relatively low price range, does not block access to advanced settings. The calibration options for this model are extensive, which is a significant plus for those who enjoy "fiddling" in the menu. We decided to approach the matter our way and see how much we could squeeze out of this panel with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Even though Xiaomi isn't a brand associated with top-tier televisions, it's fair to say that even in a budget model like the A Pro 2026, the manufacturer left plenty of calibration settings. After a few adjustments, the SDR picture took on a completely new look. The colours stopped veering into blue tones, the whites gained a sense of naturalness, and most errors dropped to a practically invisible level. As a result, SDR content looked very good, surprisingly so for this price range.

It was a slightly different story with HDR materials. Here, it was immediately noticeable what we had already mentioned – the overexposure of bright scenes and issues with balance control. Calibration helped only partially, as the limitations of the panel itself were at play. However, it must be emphasized that in the case of SDR, the television changed beyond recognition, and definitely for the better.

After calibration, the NANO81A is a completely different television. What LG offers in terms of image enhancement tools, even in such an affordable model, deserves major credit. We were able to completely eliminate that annoying yellowing of whites and make the colours natural, vibrant, and simply "real". In SDR content (i.e., regular television, YouTube, or older films), the picture now looks miles better – it’s clean, well-balanced, and no longer strains the eyes with strange hues. It’s clear that this panel has significant potential, which is simply wasted out of the box due to poor presets. However, we have one serious reservation that calibration cannot fully overcome – it's about brightness management in HDR mode. The LG algorithm in this model is very conservative. The TV deliberately dims the HDR image to avoid clipping the already weak blacks of the IPS panel. The developers faced a choice: either provide more light and accept that black would become light grey, or dial down the brightness to maintain any contrast. They chose the latter. Despite this, after our adjustments, watching anything on the NANO81 is considerably better.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.3/10

9.3/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The television really handles colour blending well, and in most scenes it's hard to spot any imperfections. This is best showcased in the brighter parts of films, where tonal transitions look almost perfect, and the image is smooth and natural. Darker scenes are somewhat less impressive, where the characteristic banding can be seen. Fortunately, this isn't a flaw that stands out, and for most viewers, it will remain virtually unnoticeable.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is an element where the NANO81A really shines. LG proves here that it can refine image processing algorithms even in its cheaper models. During testing, we practically did not notice any banding phenomenon, that annoying "stepping" visible where one colour should smoothly transition into another. Everything looks incredibly natural and smooth. This is clearly evident in bright scenes from the film Kingsman, where the backgrounds remain clean and free from digital artefacts. However, what makes an even greater impression is how the television handles extremely difficult, dark, and foggy shots in The Revenant. Where many budget panels falter and produce ugly blotches instead of a smooth mist, the NANO81A holds its ground, offering very velvety transitions. The only downside is the fact that with darker shades, you may notice the weaker black levels of this television rather than any issues with colour blending.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

3/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Upscaling and digital image processing in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 are not among the model's strong points. One might expect that since the television was not designed to achieve record brightness levels, the manufacturer would have opted for a more robust processor and a set of features that would "enhance" lower quality images. Unfortunately – we were also met with significant disappointment here. On the plus side, it has reasonably decent upscaling, which handles HD content and boosts it to 4K in an acceptable manner. However, that is where the list of advantages ends. The television does not offer any features to improve tonal transitions or smooth out digital imperfections, so in most cases, we receive a raw image, exactly as we deliver it from an external source. On a large screen, this lack of support makes lower quality content look simply bland. An additional problem is the phenomenon of overscan. When watching older material, it happens that part of the image is cut off, which only intensifies the impression that Xiaomi has quite a bit of catching up to do in this category.

It often happens that cheap 4K panels ruthlessly expose all the "dirty laundry" and imperfections in lower resolution materials. However, with the LG NANO81A, the situation is completely different. It's a really solid performer when it comes to handling content that's far from ideal. The built-in processor does a great job with upscaling. Even older recordings look quite decent on this screen – the image is coherent, cleaned of digital noise, and simply pleasant to the eye. A big plus is the gradation reduction feature, which you can find in the settings. It is exceptionally effective in combating colour banding, which is a godsend when watching low bitrate materials, such as from some streaming services or older files from the web. However, it is worth maintaining a certain vigilance. Since we are dealing with a less powerful chip than in LG's top models, too aggressive a setting for this option can sometimes result in minor artifacts or slight blurring of details. Despite this risk, I definitely encourage experimentation with this feature – in many cases, it can save the viewing experience and make low-quality material fully watchable.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.5/10

4.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (1440p@120Hz):

Blur ():

The motion fluidity in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is an interesting compromise that results from the hybrid matrix used here. At a native resolution of 4K, the maximum refresh rate is 60 Hz – sufficient for those who mainly watch movies and series. It is with them in mind that the manufacturer added a motion smoother, allowing users to adjust the image to their own preferences – one can opt for greater fluidity or leave it with more "cinematic" frames depending on the settings.

In terms of motion fluidity, the NANO81A unfortunately has a bit of a hurdle. The television is based on a panel with a refresh rate of 60Hz. If you're looking for perfect sharpness in dynamic football matches or fast-paced action games, you might feel somewhat dissatisfied. With such a low native refresh rate, fast objects on the screen will always be a bit blurry.

Console compatibility and gaming features

3.6/10

6/10

  • ALLM
    No
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

No indeed – since Xiaomi has added the "Game Boost 120 Hz" feature here, one might expect that they'd follow up with a solid gaming package. Unfortunately, reality quickly dampens that enthusiasm. Aside from this mode (which, it must be said, is a great addition in a budget build), we only have a rather peculiar player panel. It's hard to call it a full-fledged "game bar" – it's more of a simple overlay on the TV's Menu with limited options. And that’s about it. There’s no ALLM, so the TV won’t switch to game mode automatically. There’s no VRR, so you can forget about smooth frame synchronisation. We also won’t find support for Dolby Vision in games or the HGiG format, which are increasingly becoming the standard on consoles. In short: apart from Game Boost 120 Hz, which indeed allows for a more enjoyable experience at 1080p or 1440p, Xiaomi A Pro 2026 offers nothing that particularly appeals to gamers.

NANO81A is unfortunately not a device designed with esports in mind. The lack of 120 Hz signal support is a fact that users planning to purchase this model simply have to accept. Nevertheless, LG’s engineers have worked hard to squeeze the maximum potential from this 60 Hz panel, offering a set of features that genuinely improve gaming comfort. First and foremost, the television supports VRR technology (in the range of 48–60 Hz) and ALLM. This ensures that the image remains stable and does not "tear," and the device automatically switches to low latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from a console. Managing these settings is extremely simple thanks to a dedicated system overlay that allows for a quick preview of parameters without leaving the game. A very significant advantage is support for the HGiG format. This solution is crucial for owners of modern consoles, as it allows the television to correctly "understand" the intentions of game developers regarding HDR tone mapping. In practice, this helps avoid the effect of "blown-out" bright spots, such as clouds or light sources, which is unfortunately a common issue in budget LCD televisions.

Input lag

9.5/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
13 ms
1080p120
8 ms
2160p60
25 ms
12 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
25 ms
12 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Input lag on the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is quite decent and definitely isn't its weak point. The best results were achieved in 1080p@120 Hz and 1440p@120 Hz modes – there the TV drops below 10 ms, which can easily be called a phenomenal result and sufficient even for more demanding gamers. The situation changes with 60 Hz content – input lag then increases to around 25 ms. These might not be the best figures on the market, but for casual gaming or firing up the console in the evening, they will be fully acceptable. Especially since in most cases, it’s worth activating the 120 Hz mode, which is the most beneficial for gamers.

When it comes to response speed, the LG NANO81A performs exceptionally well. The input lag we measured is around 12 ms. This is a very low level, which for a gamer means one thing – the delay between moving the stick on the controller and the reaction on the screen is practically unnoticeable. The television excels in dynamic titles where every millisecond counts, and in this respect, it does not fall short of significantly more expensive models.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
No
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
25ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Xiaomi A Pro 2026 as a computer monitor? There's no beating around the bush – it’s very poor. While you can still utilise the 120 Hz mode in lower resolutions for gaming, the TV is completely unsuitable for everyday work. It lacks full support for chroma 4:4:4, so fonts appear blurred, and sometimes even rainbow-like. Additionally, there's strong dithering, which makes the image look uneven – some pixels shine brighter while others dimmer, and vertical lines can even break apart. In practice, this means that text (especially coloured and on dark backgrounds) becomes difficult to read. Light text manages to hold up somewhat, but it’s hard to talk about any real comfort. In this category, we give the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 a score of 2/10 (+1 for the additional high refresh rate mode), and there’s really no sense in elaborating on this further.

Nano81A is a really solid monitor for text work. Thanks to the IPS panel and proper implementation of Chroma 4:4:4, the fonts are very clear and sharp – practically everyone will be satisfied with how this screen performs as a monitor. We only noticed one small detail that we picked up during our laboratory scrutiny: the vertical lines of dark text are slightly darker than the horizontal ones. However, this is such a minimal phenomenon that we did not decide to deduct points for it. The scores only went down with features typically for PC gamers – there was a lack of G-Sync support and high refresh rates above 60 Hz, which will be a significant downside for those looking for a screen for dynamic gaming on the computer.

Viewing angles

3/10

6.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
63%
66%

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 features a VA panel, which immediately suggests that viewing angles are not its strong suit. When looking at the screen from the side, you will quickly notice a loss of quality – colours noticeably fade, and the whole image appears washed out. The drop in brightness may not be as drastic as in some constructions based on similar technology, but that doesn’t change the fact that it’s clearly a weak point of this model. If we plan to use it as a large, cheap screen for the lounge, one must take this limitation into account.

This is the moment when the LG NANO81A can finally "breathe" and make up for the points lost in the black and contrast categories. Due to the use of an IPS panel, the viewing angles here are simply very good. It is in this section that the tested model gains the most and clearly shows its advantage over competing televisions equipped with VA panels. In practice, this means that the image does not lose quality even when viewed at a large angle. This makes the NANO81A a great choice for people who have a wide furniture layout in their living room or often watch matches and movies with a larger group.

Daytime performance

4.9/10

4/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

LG NANO81A / NANO80A : 247 cd/m2

XIAOMI A PRO 2026: 334 cd/m2

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 performs quite well during the day. The display has a satin finish that helps reduce reflections, so colours don’t lose their vibrancy, even when the room is bright. Just bear in mind that it’s not an extremely bright screen – the average brightness is around 350 nits. In an ordinary, moderately sunny living room, it’s sufficient, but if you have large windows that let in a lot of sunlight, it might simply be tough without blinds or curtains.

NANO81A is a relatively dark television, so it works best in rooms where you have control over the lighting. With a brightness of around 250 nits, it's hard to recommend it with a clear conscience for very bright, heavily sunlit lounges – in such conditions, the picture will simply lack punch. Nonetheless, LG deserves a small plus for the screen finish. The satin matrix used here quite effectively suppresses reflections. As a result, even if there is a bit of light in the room, you won't see reflections of every detail from your surroundings on the screen. So, if you can slightly close the blinds, a daytime viewing experience will definitely be possible, but this model simply wasn’t designed to "fight" full sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
White LED
Software version during testing
UKN1.240806.017.V816.0.25.5.13.621.4.URTMIXM
33.21.62
Image processor
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1530 MHz

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details

XIAOMI A PRO 2026

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

TV features

6.1/10

6.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review XIAOMI A PRO 2026 TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features

SmartTV- Google TV

The biggest plus of the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is the Google TV system. It gives the television a second life – you can run almost any app on it, from Netflix and YouTube to music services and even lesser-known programs from the Google Play store. We are not limited to what the manufacturer has pre-installed, as is often the case with other budget televisions. On top of that, we have AirPlay, voice search via Google Assistant, and even integration with Gemini. We did experience some small hiccups – for instance, screen mirroring from a laptop didn’t always work – but despite these shortcomings, Google TV is a huge advantage of this model.

Classic TV functions

The Xiaomi A Pro 2026 can be described as a "senior-friendly" television. The large remote with a numeric keypad and a considerable number of physical buttons makes it intuitive to operate. Support for teletext and a clear EPG interface make it easy to use classic television functions. We won’t find many advanced features like USB recording or PiP functionality, but the presence of an analogue headphone jack output can be surprisingly practical for some users. It gives the impression that this is a set of features tailored to the needs of the most traditional viewers.

System stability

However, not everything works as it should. During testing, we encountered annoying system lags, issues with Miracast, and problems when switching audio sources. There were times when a reset of the television was necessary by unplugging it from the power. This only shows that while Google TV offers enormous possibilities, the stability can still be very problematic in such a budget-friendly model.

Smart Features: WebOS

One of the greatest advantages of the NANO81A model is its “brain,” that is, the operating system. LG has implemented a full-fledged WebOS version for 2025, which in terms of fluidity and usability is on par with the more expensive models from this brand. Applications launch smoothly, and navigating the menu is a pure pleasure - there’s no sign of the annoying stutters often found in budget competitors. This is all thanks to the unique remote with a pointer (cursor) function, which has undergone a visual overhaul this year. The manufacturer has opted for minimalism - the new Magic remote is significantly smaller and more ergonomic than its predecessors. It fits perfectly in the hand, but this change has a downside as well. The physical number section has completely disappeared from the casing. For younger users, accustomed to streaming and selecting tiles, this will be no problem. However, older household members, who are used to entering channel numbers from memory, will have to change their long-standing habits.

Everyday Use

In terms of features that we would call “classic,” the NANO81A relies on tried-and-true standards. It is not a multimedia powerhouse that will surprise you with exotic additions, but in everyday television use, it performs flawlessly. The operation of traditional terrestrial or cable television, including even the old good Teletext, is correct and intuitive. Wireless communication also deserves praise. The Bluetooth module works very reliably, allowing for quick and stable connections to a game console controller or wireless headphones and speakers. It’s simply a television that “works” – it is stable, predictable, and does not cause unnecessary complications in daily use.

Apps

9.6/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

6.8/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the Xiaomi A Pro 2026 is quite a conundrum. On one hand, it plays most popular audio and video formats without major issues. On the other hand, it can struggle with basic things like Polish characters. Files with letters such as ą, ł, ć, or ś in the name often refuse to open or display incorrectly. It looks strange, because we supposedly have codec support, yet the TV simply gets lost on straightforward matters related to the alphabet. Fortunately, this isn’t a huge problem, as thanks to Google TV we can simply install another player, like VLC. At that point, the issue with Polish characters totally disappears and media usage becomes seamless.

Many users still rely on their own USB drives to display movies or photos on a large screen. In this respect, the NANO81A performs quite decently – the built-in player supports a wide range of video and audio codecs, so most movie libraries will fire up "straight away". However, it's important to remember the specifics of the WebOS system. Since it is a closed environment, we are stuck with what the manufacturer has provided for us. There is no option to install alternative players (like the popular VLC), so if the system player can't handle something, there isn't much that can be done about it. During testing, we encountered a few specific limitations. Firstly, there is a lack of support for HEIC files. If you take photos with an iPhone and want to view them directly from a USB drive, the TV simply won't see them – it's worth changing the save format to JPG on the phone right away. We also noticed that the player struggles with processing very large graphic files. Photos with a resolution of around 20–28 Mpix may not load or may cause system errors. Aside from these exceptions, everyday multimedia handling is hassle-free.

Sound

5/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

Last year, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 surprised us with its pretty decent sound for a super budget segment television. Unfortunately, this year's edition – the A Pro 2026, has completely let us down. The sound feels like it's coming from underwater: flat, lacking any bass or depth. The only positive is the wide support for audio formats like Dolby Atmos and DTS:X, but in practice, it doesn't really change much. If you're considering this television, you'll need to factor in a soundbar straight away, as the audio experience without it will be quite disappointing.

In terms of audio, the LG NANO81A is surprisingly good compared to its higher-end brother, the QNED80A model. Interestingly, the NanoCell performs slightly better, likely due to its somewhat thicker casing. The increased volume allows for the extraction of any low-frequency nuances – while the bass may not be powerful, it is more clearly defined than in thinner constructions. However, one shouldn’t expect miracles. It’s still a standard 2.0 speaker setup with a total power of 20 W, so the overall sound characteristic remains similar to other models in this price range. The mid and high tones are decent, making dialogues in films and news programs clear. While this slight improvement in the lower registers is appreciated, for true home theatre or listening to music, it’s still worth considering the addition of even a simple soundbar.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC