TCL C9K vs Philips PUS7000

Direct comparison

C9K

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.7

5.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.4

    4.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.0

    5.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    4.9

  • Gaming on console

    8.9

    6.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    5.8

  • Watching in bright light

    7.0

    3.5

  • Utility functions

    7.7

    5.0

  • Apps

    9.6

    6.7

  • Sound quality

    7.9

    5.8

Advantages

  • Very good contrast and black levels

  • Very high brightness

  • Support for all HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Fast 144Hz panel - for gaming and sports enthusiasts

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, low input lag, etc.

  • GoogleTV operating system with a wide range of applications

  • Great sound branded Bang & Olufsen

  • Improved viewing angles thanks to WHVA panel

  • Attractive price

  • High contrast VA panel

  • Very low input lag

  • Gaming features – presence of VRR, ALLM, and a dedicated Game Bar

  • Supports HDR10+

  • Quite decent image processing (for such a cheap TV)

  • Good readability of fonts – suitable as a large monitor

  • Backlit remote with numeric keypad

Disadvantages

No like
  • Local dimming needs improvement

  • Only 2 HDMI 2.1 ports

  • No recording function from built-in tuners and no PiP

  • No smaller variants like 55"

  • Very low brightness – 200 nits

  • No Ambilight

  • Lack of any features to improve fluidity makes the image feel very "raw"

  • Titan OS system – the interface is slow, lacking many popular applications

  • The remote works on infrared

Our verdict

The TCL C9K is a television that on paper looks like a showcase of the manufacturer's prowess – thousands of Mini-LED zones, a WHVA panel, audio system by Bang & Olufsen, full HDR format support, gaming at 144 Hz, and even 288 Hz at lower resolutions. It’s clear that TCL wanted to pack in absolutely everything they had that was best. And indeed – in many respects, the C9K can impress. The brightness is immense, HDR can be stunning in larger scenes, motion fluidity and gamer capabilities are at a top level, and the sound – for a TV speaker – sounds really good. It’s equipment that can easily be regarded as the hub of home entertainment. But there's also another side to the coin. Brightness management simply falters despite the incredible technical specification – smaller details often get lost in shadows or are burned out. And although synthetic tests of contrast and brightness appear outstanding, in day-to-day watching of films and series the effect isn't as impressive.

To summarise briefly: the C9K is a television full of contrasts – literally and metaphorically. It can deliver experiences close to the top screens, but it’s still clear that TCL needs to work on software and optimisation. If someone is looking for a screen for gaming, sports or spectacular blockbusters – they will be thrilled. However, if they are counting on perfect reproduction of the director's vision and think they have managed to buy an absolutely top model at half the price of the competition, they will unfortunately be disappointed. It’s a pity, because the technological potential here is really immense – just a bit of common sense in its application was lacking.

If you're looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, the price is pretty much it. This model is primarily meant to be cheap, and it fulfills that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally upgrade to 4K without emptying the wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget 60 Hz" model, Philips hasn't forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which realistically improve the gaming experience when connected to a console and make everything quite responsive. But... indeed. The biggest problem with this TV is its brightness, or rather the lack thereof. 200 nits is a figure that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The picture will be pale and not very clear despite the fact that it features a high-contrast VA panel. HDR is essentially just a label on the box here. With such a dim panel, HDR materials look artificial and simply lack the necessary punch, so it's better to forget about them and stick to standard SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 doesn’t drastically stand out from the other budget screens. The question is whether you'll get along with the Titan OS system, which is still a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard with competitors. Given today's prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are churning out QLEDs and Mini-LEDs like there’s no tomorrow, the Philips PUS7000 faces a really tough battle. If you value the logo of a well-known brand and a low price: you can go ahead. However, if you’re looking for picture quality... it’s better to double-check your budget before making a purchase.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Average
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Silver
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

8.1/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 3024 (42 x 72)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

459,000:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

72,750:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

30,350:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

9,800:1

Review TCL C9K Contrast and black detail

Result

12,200:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

What immediately sets the C9K apart from the C8K model is the number of local dimming zones. In the 65-inch version, we counted… over 3000! I must admit – it’s a true show of force from TCL, who crammed literally everything they had on hand into this television. On paper, it makes a huge impression and indeed – in less demanding film scenes, the blacks look fantastic. The level is absolutely top-notch, and the separation of lights from dark parts of the image can be astonishing. The problem is that this impressive specification doesn’t always translate into practice. In our tests, we noticed situations where the C9K, despite having a greater number of zones, got caught in contrast traps and performed… worse than the C8K. For instance, it struggles to perfectly dim the true black bars in 21:9 films (those with black bars at the top and bottom). Sounds strange? Unfortunately, this is the result of a lack of optimisation – the hardware is “packed” with technology, but the algorithms don’t always keep pace with exploiting this potential.

Don’t get us wrong – black is a strong point of the C9K and in many scenes, it simply looks fantastic. In synthetic measurements, the contrast performs exceptionally well, coming close to the level of the best televisions on the market. But in real cinematic use, these numbers don’t always correlate with a better experience than that of its cheaper cousin. And that’s perhaps the biggest disappointment – because the potential was enormous.

The model PUS7000 we tested, measuring 55 inches, is equipped with a VA panel. This is crucial for black quality, as in such budget constructions, we won't find local dimming systems that could assist the screen in dark scenes. Therefore, all the work relies on the panel itself, which, thanks to its characteristics, offers decent contrast at a level of 6000:1. In practice, this translates to significantly better experiences during evening viewings compared to competing TVs with IPS panels. The blacks here are better separated from bright elements, so dark parts of the image don’t appear washed out, and details in the shadows remain visible. However, it’s worth noting that with completely turned off lights, the black may slightly lean towards shades of navy blue and won't be as perfectly “pitch-black” as in more expensive models. To mitigate this effect and improve the perception of depth, it’s advisable to watch the TV with some light, additional illumination in the room. Usually, this problem was somewhat resolved by the well-known Ambilight system in Philips TVs, which optically increases contrast through the glow on the wall. Unfortunately, in the PUS7000 model, the manufacturer opted to seek savings, which is why we won’t find this lighting system here, which is standard in higher series like PUS8000.

HDR effect quality

6.9/10

3.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 96.5%, Bt.2020: 80.5%
DCI P3: 78.3%, Bt.2020: 57.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1425 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

531 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1277 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

331 nit

Review TCL C9K Brightness measurement

Result

1424 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

197 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

209 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PUS7000

TCL C9K

As we mentioned regarding black levels and contrast – the C9K can make a huge impression in synthetic tests. Our measurements showed that on a screen 10% filled with white, the television can achieve... 4000 nits of brightness! It sounds out of this world, but – and here's where the pattern unfortunately repeats – the numbers say one thing, and the practical experience says another. In real movie scenes, the situation looks different. In the best-case scenario, when light effects occupy a large part of the image and the local dimming algorithm doesn't have to ponder too much about what to do with thousands of zones, the effect is really quite good. At that point, the C9K can hit around 1500 nits, which delivers a pleasant, intense burst and can indeed leave a positive impression.

The problem arises with smaller elements – such as stars in the sky, the moon, or individual reflections. That's when the proverbial cat comes out of the bag: the algorithms are not yet refined, and brightness drops to as low as 400–500 nits. That's a huge difference from the potential 4000 nits we saw in lab tests. Why does this happen? Most likely, the television is trying to protect the black levels in this way and minimize the halo effect around bright objects. Unfortunately, this comes at the expense of detail – some details simply vanish, and the scene loses its nature.

Unfortunately, the PUS7000 is not suitable for watching HDR content. This screen is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is insufficient to display this format correctly. Even if a HDR signal message appears on the screen, the image will resemble a standard SDR recording. Therefore, it’s better to stick with the latter format to avoid errors in displaying bright scenes, as you will read below. The situation is worsened by the fact that this is a classic LCD model without additional layers that improve colours, such as QLED or PFS. As a result, colours in HDR may seem washed out. Ultimately, this provides a worse effect than in the standard SDR format, which is simply better suited to the capabilities of this panel.

Factory color reproduction

4.5/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

For colour tests, we once again reached for the Filmmaker mode – a new feature in TCL televisions for 2025. While the direction is a step in the right way, the execution leaves a lot to be desired. The white balance in SDR content turned out to be too warm – there was an excess of red. On the other hand, in HDR, it swung in the opposite direction: the image became excessively blue. The Colour Checker test revealed quite a few colour inaccuracies that were noticeable to the naked eye. An even bigger problem turned out to be what we mentioned above – brightness management. Regardless of whether we were watching SDR or HDR content, the image tended to wash out the entire scene, giving it an unnatural, almost grotesque character. Therefore, it’s hard to call this a "director's mode" – because no director has ever seen such an image.

We tested the television in movie mode, which theoretically should provide the best and most natural colours. And indeed, this mode is quite correct; however, when we connected the calibration equipment, its biggest flaw became apparent. The PUS7000 has significant shortcomings in displaying reds. Poorly tuned white balance and too low saturation of this colour cause the image to appear too cool. As a result, one might get the impression that the displayed content lacks vibrant colours. The situation is worsened by the fact that both SDR and HDR content are excessively brightened. This is confirmed by the gamma curve and EOTF graphs, which show that the television displays the image brighter than it should. This causes scenes to lose their depth and can make them seem slightly washed out. Fortunately, in the Philips menu, we find plenty of features to improve these aspects, so we immediately proceeded to calibration to see what we could extract from this screen.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, we finally managed to tame the white balance – and it immediately translated into a more natural image. Colours finally started to look as they should, and the overall presentation was incomparably better than on the factory settings. In other words – it’s worth taking a moment to improve this, as the gain is really significant. The gamma responsible for brightness management also managed to be brought into order in SDR content, and the effect was more than satisfactory. Unfortunately, when we turned on HDR materials, the situation quickly became complicated. No matter how we set the local dimming, the television had a tendency to do what it liked with the image – either it overexposed everything or darkened the darkest parts too much. Just like we saw in the scene from the movie Billy Lynn. Colour-wise, the improvement after calibration makes a great impression, but brightness management in HDR remains the Achilles' heel of the C9K and presents a certain technological limitation.

After professional calibration, it’s evident that the PUS7000 responds well to image adjustments. In this price range, that’s not a given. The effects are best evaluated in two scenarios, depending on the content we plan to watch. SDR performs the best. After our adjustments, the image looks really good. Most colour errors have dropped below level 3, which is the threshold at which discrepancies usually become visible to the naked eye. Movies, series, sports, and regular television present naturally, without unpleasant deviations. If someone mainly watches classic channels or streams in HD quality, the difference after calibration will be noticeable straight away. However, it must be said clearly that the PUS7000 is still not a television suited for proper HDR, and calibration doesn't change much in this regard. The reason lies in the hardware: colours remain too unsaturated. The television lacks solutions that widen the colour gamut, such as PFS filters or a quantum dot layer, so the panel simply cannot display the intense colours required by HDR. This is most evident in reds, which still look washed out. This limitation cannot be circumvented through menu settings, as it stems from the design of the backlighting and the panel itself.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.7/10

6/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

In terms of tonal transition fluidity, TCL C9K performs quite well. In more challenging movie scenes, there's no typical banding of colours that can break immersion even in more expensive TVs. There may be slight issues in the brightest areas – for example, in scenes from the movie Kingstone – but these are nuances. For the vast majority of viewers, especially with 4K content, colour gradation will appear smooth and practically unnoticeable.

When it comes to colour gradation in bright scenes, the PUS7000 model performs surprisingly well. It's hard to have any major complaints here. The colour transitions are natural and smooth, which means there are no disturbing bands or jumps between shades on a bright background. During the viewing of cheerful scenes, nothing should distract your attention from the screen. However, the situation changes dramatically when darker shades of grey or simply very dark colours appear on the screen. Unfortunately, quite strong "banding" of colours becomes noticeable then. Instead of smooth transitions, we get distinct breaks between the individual tones. In dark, atmospheric films, this can be quite annoying and detract from the viewing experience, as the tonal transitions are not as clean as in the bright areas of the image.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

6.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Digital image processing on the TCL C9K is rather average. The smooth tone transition feature seems to be present, but activating it practically changes nothing – colour bands are still visible, and it can unintentionally highlight elements we’d rather keep hidden, such as object textures. Fortunately, it doesn’t remove film grain, but that’s poor consolation given that the effects are still meagre. It’s therefore hard to recommend using this option.

On the other hand, image scaling presents itself much better. Lower quality materials look quite decent – characters and backgrounds are rendered clearly, although of course, with sources like 576p, the laws of physics cannot be fooled. Occasionally, there’s characteristic edge distortion of objects, but that’s the fault of the source itself, not the algorithm. A plus for not having issues with overscan – the image isn't artificially cropped or enlarged.

The PUS7000 handles digital image processing quite well. The distortion reduction feature deserves praise, as it effectively smooths unwanted tonal transitions even at a low setting. However, it has its downside: with too aggressive operation, it can introduce undesirable artifacts on the screen. It would be a good idea to experiment with this setting to find the golden mean between a smooth image and the clarity of details.

The upscaling, or enhancing the quality of lower materials to 4K, is decent. The image after processing is very "soft," which is typical of almost all Philips TVs. The edges are plastic and smooth, making the image look cohesive. If someone finds it too soft, it can always be adjusted with the sharpness slider in the menu for a more pronounced effect.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.8/10

3.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
No
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
51%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (1080p@288Hz):

Blur ():

Similar to the C8K, the C9K is also a really fast TV – both figuratively and literally. It features a 4K panel with a refresh rate of 144 Hz, and at lower resolutions, the panel can even ramp up to 288 Hz. Such speed translates into practice – while watching sports or playing games, the image looks very smooth and clear. Additionally, in movies, we get an extra motion smoother called Motion Clarity, which allows you to adjust the smoothness to your own preferences – from cinematic "judder" to almost theatrical smoothness.

In this regard, we actually have no good news. It might seem that the biggest downside is the lack of a 120 Hz panel, but in this price range, that's actually the norm, and it's hard to expect more. However, the worst part is that the television has no motion smoothing features. There are no supporting systems in place for either movies or sports. We have to come to terms with the fact that the image on the PUS7000 is processed "raw." This means that during dynamic scenes or fast camera movements, motion can appear choppy or unclear. We have no option to enable any smoothers that could alleviate this effect.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

4.7/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 288Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

From a gaming perspective, the TCL C9K is a complete tool. It features two (out of four) full bandwidth 48 Gbps HDMI 2.1 ports, so all the key technologies work: VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) and ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode). Additionally, the manufacturer has included a really intuitive Game Bar that allows you to quickly check the most important parameters and adjust settings without fumbling through menus. Also, TCL's policy is a plus – the TV isn’t afraid of any HDR formats, even in game mode. Whether it's HGiG or Dolby Vision for the Xbox Series S/X console – everything works as it should, giving the player plenty of freedom.

Even though the PUS7000 isn’t marketed as a gaming TV, it doesn't perform as poorly in this category as one might expect. True, it doesn't support 120 Hz refresh rates, which is understandable at this price point, but the manufacturer has included several important features that significantly improve the console gaming experience. The most important of these are VRR and ALLM technologies. VRR is responsible for synchronising the screen with the number of frames generated by the console. This means the image doesn't "tear" and remains consistent even during sudden drops in frame rates while playing. On the other hand, ALLM is a solution that automatically switches the TV to a mode with the lowest latency immediately after detecting a signal from the console. All these parameters are easily accessible thanks to the Game Bar feature. This is a special control panel for gamers that can be brought up on the screen at any time. It allows for a quick view of current settings and connection status without interrupting gameplay, which is a very convenient solution.

Input lag

9.8/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
12 ms
1080p120
7 ms
2160p60
16 ms
12 ms
2160p120
7 ms

HDR

2160p60
16 ms
13 ms
2160p120
7 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
16 ms
2160p120 DV
7 ms

In terms of input lag, the TCL C9K performs exceptionally well. With 120 Hz content, the lag is only 7 ms, placing it among the very top televisions available on the market. Naturally, with 60 Hz materials, the input lag increases to around 15–16 ms, but in practice, this has little impact on the final responsiveness of the screen to our actions on the controller.

Another plus for gamers is the very low input lag at around 12 ms. In this price range, the result is impressive. The delay is so minimal that the response to controller movements feels instantaneous, and in practice, it’s hard to notice at all. Gaming remains comfortable even in fast, dynamic titles where every millisecond counts. In this respect, the PUS7000 can keep up with much more expensive televisions.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

5.8/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
7ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

When it comes to office work, the TCL C9K does not disappoint – thanks to support for chroma 4:4:4, text readability is at a good level, so typing or working with documents shouldn’t be a problem. While there are some minor issues with dimming horizontal lines, in everyday use it’s hard to call this a real flaw. However, the biggest potential of the C9K reveals itself in PC gaming. Here, the television showcases its full capabilities – it can switch to lower resolutions, such as Full HD, and display images at up to 288 Hz. Additionally, it supports both G-Sync and FreeSync, so synchronisation with the graphics card works excellently. It’s hard to have any significant complaints about this setup – it’s truly a top-tier screen for gaming on a computer.

When it comes to connecting a computer, the possibilities for gaming are quite limited. The screen supports a maximum of 60 Hz and does not offer G-Sync technology, so it’s not equipment for demanding PC gamers. However, the PUS7000 surprisingly performs well for text work. The readability of fonts is at a very high level. The television correctly handles 4:4:4 chroma subsampling. This means that each letter, regardless of its size or colour, is displayed sharply and without any distortion on the edges. As a result, office work or browsing the internet on this screen is simply comfortable and doesn’t strain the eyes like some cheap panels that struggle with clean font rendering.

Viewing angles

4.5/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
75%
70%

A new feature in TCL televisions for 2025 is the WHVA panel, which is designed to provide better viewing angles than standard VA panels. And indeed – progress is noticeable. When viewing the screen from the side, the image is clearer and the colours do not degrade as quickly as in previous models. However, this does not mean that we are encountering the level of top coatings or solutions found in IPS panels, and certainly not OLEDs. The image remains readable, but the brightness noticeably drops. This is definitely a step forward compared to earlier TCL models, but not a full revolution yet.

The viewing angles on this model are weak, which is directly due to the use of a VA-type panel. Although this panel provides decent contrast, as I mentioned earlier, it has one major flaw: it requires you to sit directly in front of the screen. Just shifting slightly to the side is enough for the colours to start losing saturation, and the image becomes noticeably worse.

Daytime performance

7/10

3.5/10

Panel finish
Glare
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

Philips PUS7000: 202 cd/m2

TCL C9K: 642 cd/m2

The new WHVA matrix coating has its strengths and weaknesses. On one hand, it handles smaller reflections quite well, but on the other hand, with stronger light sources, it shows that the suppression of reflections isn't at the highest level. Fortunately, the coating doesn't ruin what's most important: the blacks and colour saturation. This is definitely a plus, as in many competing models, compromises in this area are much more painful. Additionally, it has very high brightness – in SDR content, the C9K can achieve an average of 650 nits in SDR materials. This performance is more than sufficient for watching TV or films in challenging lighting conditions, even on a sunny day.

In a sunny room, the PUS7000 performs poorly. This is due to the fact that the display is simply too dim. A brightness level of 200 nits is very low, which does not allow for comfortable viewing in a lot of daylight. On the plus side, the satin screen coating does a decent job of reducing reflections. Thanks to this, reflections are not overly noticeable on the display, but it's not enough to save the situation. The brightness of this model is too low to cut through strong sunlight, so in very bright rooms, the image will simply be quite unclear.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
White LED
Software version during testing
V8-0012T01-LF1V538.002459
TPN256E_V056.002.236.141
Image processor
MT5896 2,5 GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review TCL C9K TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details

TCL C9K

Philips PUS7000

TV features

7.7/10

5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review TCL C9K TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features

Classic TV Features

In terms of basic TV functions, the TCL C9K does not disappoint – it has everything that most users expect. The EPG guide operates smoothly, teletext is available, and pairing Bluetooth headphones, a mouse or a keyboard goes off without a hitch. However, it should be noted that in the Google TV system – just like in other TCL models – there is a lack of more advanced options such as programme recording or picture-in-picture (PiP) mode. Some people may find this unsatisfactory, especially if they have used such features with competitors. It's also worth mentioning that we only have one USB port – it's enough to connect a hard drive with movies or a USB stick, but if someone plans to use multiple storage devices, they may find this lacking.

Smart Features

While in terms of classic solutions the TCL C9K does not stand out, in the field of smart functions it showcases its full potential. The Google TV system is currently the most popular platform and it’s clear why – the app library is enormous. Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, HBO Max, Amazon Prime Video – all are readily available. Only those very attached to more closed ecosystems, like Apple Music, will feel the absence. A significant advantage is the built-in voice assistant – it works quickly, understands natural commands, and allows for convenient control of the TV: from switching channels to opening apps, as well as searching for content or checking the weather. It’s in this area that the TCL C9K shows that a smart TV is more than just a “TV with internet” – it’s a tool that genuinely simplifies everyday use of the device.

Titan OS System

Titan OS is still a fairly new operating system, and unfortunately, this is noticeable in everyday use. The whole system operates sluggishly, at times even clumsily. The response to commands from the remote is slow, which is further complicated by the fact that the device uses infrared connectivity instead of Bluetooth / RF. This means we need to aim the remote fairly precisely at the television for the system to respond at all. During testing, we again failed to launch the screen mirroring feature with computers running Windows. Fortunately, transmitting video from Apple devices via AirPlay worked without any issues. Another downside of Titan OS is its very modest app library. The selection is much smaller than in systems like webOS or Tizen, not to mention Google TV, where the choice of programs is almost unlimited.

Classic Features

On the other hand, the PUS7000 might be a good choice for people who primarily watch traditional television. Here, we find a properly functioning teletext and a clear EPG interface, which is an electronic program guide. The remote included is backlit, which makes it very handy to use after dark, and it features standard numeric buttons for quick channel selection. An interesting addition is the presence of a classic jack headphone input. This is a rarely seen feature in new televisions, allowing for the connection of older home theatre systems or wired headphones without the need to purchase adapters.

Apps

9.6/10

6.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.2/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The C9K had no trouble handling most of the materials we threw onto the USB drive – from MKV formatted films, through older AVI files, to audio tracks in DTS and FLAC. The only issue remains the lack of support for HEIC photos from Apple devices, but this is a problem for practically all manufacturers. However, the most important thing is that if someone is missing support for some exotic format, they can always reach for an alternative player available in the Google Play store. And this is where the advantage of the Google TV system shines through – the ease with which you can expand the television’s capabilities with additional applications.

The built-in media player works quite well and handles most popular video formats without any major issues. The television easily reads subtitles from files and manages various audio formats, so those who keep movies on a drive or USB shouldn't feel restricted. The only hitch concerns the photo browser – not everything worked properly, and some files, especially in selected resolutions, did not open at all.

Sound

7.9/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    77dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The sound in the TCL C9K is handled by the same setup as in the C8K model – prepared in collaboration with Bang & Olufsen. It features a 4.2.2 configuration with a total power of 90 W, consisting of eight speakers arranged to create a fuller sense of space. And I must admit – the effect is impressive. The dialogues are clear, the highs and mids sound pure, and the bass does not falter, even during louder screenings. Of course, this won't replace a dedicated soundbar or home theatre system, but for built-in speakers – there’s really something to listen to.

*During maximum volume tests, we noticed unusual behaviour from the audio system. With the slider set to 100%, the television reaches around 76–78 dB, but it’s clear that it tries to generate more power, after which the sound level is immediately corrected back to the mentioned value. On the other hand, when we lower the volume to, say, 70%, it initially decreases as expected, but after a moment, it slowly rises back up to that same level of 76 dB. This effect gives the impression of an aggressive limiter at work, which regardless of the slider position always brings the volume back to a single level. We checked this behaviour multiple times, and in each case, the result was the same – no additional functions for 'intelligent' volume adjustment or AI were active during these tests.

The sound is pretty much at a budget level. It's sufficient for news and talk shows, but with films and music, it quickly lacks depth and bass. At this price, it's hard to expect much more, so if we’re after better experiences, it’s worth considering a soundbar or connecting external audio, even just through the headphone jack.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

77dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC