TCL C75B vs SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2)

Direct comparison

BRAVIA 3 II / XR35M2

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”100”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.6

7.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.4

    6.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.0

    6.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.2

    6.7

  • Gaming on console

    8.4

    8.1

  • TV as a computer monitor

    7.6

    7.2

  • Watching in bright light

    4.9

    5.8

  • Utility functions

    6.6

    7.9

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    6.6

    6.8

Advantages

  • Great TV for gamers - HDMI 2.1: VRR, ALLM, Game Bar

  • Very high refresh rate - 240Hz in FullHD and 144Hz in 4K

  • Very low input lag - 9ms

  • Advanced operating system - GoogleTV

  • Support for Dolby Vision, HDR10+

  • Decent black levels thanks to VA panel

  • Very good motion clarity and exceptionally low motion blur for a 120Hz LCD TV

  • Finally, 4 × HDMI 2.1 48 Gb/s!

  • Lots of gaming features: VRR, ALLM, low input lag

  • Wide colour gamut: QLED (PFS)

  • Dolby Vision support

  • Google TV with a wide range of apps and features

  • Broad audio format support: Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Record programmes to USB

  • Two remotes included

Disadvantages

No like
  • Limited brightness (350 cd/m²), making it difficult to watch in bright rooms

  • Issues with the smoothness of the Google TV system

  • Missing traditional features like USB recording or PIP

  • Average response time of the panel causing motion blur

  • High price for what it offers; for only a little more you can buy the much better BRAVIA 5 model

  • No local dimming

  • No proper HGiG support

  • Average processing of lower-quality source material

Our verdict

The mid-range television segment is expanding rapidly, and TCL C75B demonstrates that it’s possible to get really solid equipment in this price category. This model is clearly designed with gamers in mind – the HDMI 2.1 port offers a lot of potential, providing VRR, ALLM, and impressive 144 Hz refresh rate in 4K (or 240 Hz in Full HD), which will certainly please both gaming and sports fans. The TV’s operation is pleasant and intuitive, mainly thanks to the Google TV system. While there may be minor stutters, the wealth of available apps and features more than compensates for this – practically everything we need is at our fingertips or even at the sound of our voice if we wish to talk to the remote in Polish. As for picture quality, TCL C75B also performs well. Thanks to the VA panel, it boasts quite good contrast, and the presence of Dolby Vision allows for enjoyable HDR effects, even if the brightness isn’t mind-blowing. Of course, it isn't without its flaws – despite the fast panel, there is some motion blur, and the lack of traditional features (like USB recording) may disappoint some users. Nevertheless, in its price category, the C75B is a very attractive option, especially for those looking for a screen designed for high-level gaming.

The Sony Bravia 3 II is a TV where you can quickly see what the manufacturer had in mind for this model. It’s meant above all to be a sensible Bravia for gaming, and in that respect the changes are quite significant. Sony has finally fixed one of the biggest headaches of its TVs, namely having only two full HDMI 2.1 ports. This one has four, and that alone makes the Bravia 3 II a much more convenient choice for anyone who wants to connect a lot of gaming gear. Fortunately it’s not limited to gaming. The 120 Hz panel performs very well for motion, motion blur is minimal, and the motion-enhancing systems work surprisingly effectively, at times even better than on Sony’s top sets. That makes sport another use case where the Bravia 3 II feels right at home. Add Google TV with its full suite of apps and features, and in terms of everyday use it’s just the Sony we’ve known for years.

The biggest problem with this model, however, isn’t the TV itself but its current price. The Bravia 3 II is today dangerously close in price to the Bravia 5, and when the extra cost for the higher model is just a few percent, choosing the lower series starts to make less sense. The Bravia 5 already offers a full Mini-LED backlight with local dimming, which is exactly what the Bravia 3 II most lacks for evening viewing and HDR. That’s why we look at this model mainly through the lens of price. The Bravia 3 II itself is a very successful lower-mid-range TV and, at the right price, could easily be one of the more interesting choices for a gamer or sports fan. However, if the gap to the Bravia 5 remains small, it will be hard to recommend it wholeheartedly.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Two remote controls, Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.9/10

5.6/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review TCL C75B Contrast and black detail

Result

5,400:1

Review TCL C75B Contrast and black detail

Result

5,700:1

Review TCL C75B Contrast and black detail

Result

6,600:1

Review TCL C75B Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Review TCL C75B Contrast and black detail

Result

4,100:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,050:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,650:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,850:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

6,400:1

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,350:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The TV we tested, TCL C75B in size X," is equipped with a VA panel, which naturally provides quite decent contrast results – and that’s what we observed during our tests. On each test pattern, the TV achieved a contrast level of around 5500:1. This is a result that can be considered very good in this price category. The black in this model performs really well, though of course, it’s far from perfect.

Due to the C75B belonging to the mid-range segment, we won’t find local dimming technology here. This is particularly noticeable in more demanding scenes, such as those from the film Sicario 2, where we noticed that the black takes on a navy hue instead of a pitch-black. This limitation of panels without local dimming can be particularly evident in evening viewings with the lights off, when dark elements of the image are more pronounced. It's worth keeping this in mind when choosing a TV in this category, especially if we care about the best quality of black while watching movies at night.

Bravia 3 II uses a VA panel, a solution that by nature delivers significantly better contrast than IPS or ADS panels. In our unit the native contrast ratio was around 5000:1 and, for a TV without local dimming, that's a pretty good result. In practice that means in a lightly lit room blacks can look genuinely decent. Dark parts of the image do not immediately go grey, and night scenes have noticeably more depth than on many TVs with IPS panels. The poorer black performance becomes visible, however, when you turn the lights off. The Bravia 3 II does not have local dimming, so the entire backlight operates in a similar way regardless of what is happening in a given area of the image. In a dark room it is easy to notice that black is no longer truly black but starts to shift towards a dark navy. It is not a level that severely spoils the film, but during an evening viewing the difference compared with Mini-LED, and even more so with an OLED TV, becomes very clear.

HDR effect quality

5.3/10

5.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.0%, Bt.2020: 73.0%
DCI P3: 94.2%, Bt.2020: 73.9%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review TCL C75B Brightness measurement

Result

368 nit

Review TCL C75B Brightness measurement

Result

382 nit

Review TCL C75B Brightness measurement

Result

429 nit

Review TCL C75B Brightness measurement

Result

404 nit

Review TCL C75B Brightness measurement

Result

425 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

408 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

430 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

449 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

457 nit

Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) Brightness measurement

Result

455 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2)

TCL C75B

During our brightness test, the TCL C75B "spat out" around 380 nits of brightness. We recorded similar results while watching most of the films we tested. These can be considered average – the TV performs decently in this segment, but around 400 nits is definitely too low to fully experience the magic of HDR effects. Of course, such results are better than those of budget models, which can achieve nearly half the brightness values. However, for HDR enthusiasts seeking stronger lighting effects and greater realism, the C75B may prove insufficient. On the plus side, it's worth mentioning the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut at 95%. This is a very good result that easily suffices to enjoy a wide range of colours in content available on popular streaming platforms. Vivid and rich colours are definitely a strong point of this model.

The Bravia 3 II isn't exactly a TV that tries to impress with brightness. In our measurements it reached around 450 nits, so it's well short of the brightest models on the market. That doesn't mean HDR is just a paper feature here. Compared with standard SDR material, the brightest parts of the image can already punch through noticeably, and highlights, light sources and stronger exposures have a bit more energy and stand out better from the rest of the scene. You can see this best in simpler shots where the screen contains lots of bright elements. Then the Bravia 3 II can give a taste of a higher-dynamic-range picture. The problem only starts with more demanding content, where much greater brightness headroom is needed. There the TV quickly shows its limits and instead of bold, spectacular HDR we’re left with a merely competent picture.

Colours

The Bravia 3 II uses a QLED panel, although technically it doesn't employ a traditional quantum-dot layer. Instead Sony has used a PFS phosphor-based solution, which performs a very similar role: it allows for more saturated reds and greens, and thus reproduces a much wider colour gamut. In our measurements coverage of the DCI-P3 gamut was about 94%, and of the very wide BT.2020 around 74.4%. Those are good results for this class of hardware, which means the Bravia 3 II has no problem showing suitably saturated colours in HDR material. Colours don't look washed out, and the more intense hues can look really attractive.

Factory color reproduction

7.3/10

6.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

TCL C75B offers various picture modes, but in our opinion, the best choice is the “Film” mode. Although its settings are quite decent, the TV struggles with certain colour reproduction issues. In tests, we noticed that the image had a noticeably pinkish hue compared to what could be considered correct. This effect was particularly evident in skin tones, which appeared unnaturally flushed. The main culprit of this phenomenon turned out to be the white balance, characterised by an excess of blue and red in both HD and 4K HDR materials.

An additional problem was the way brightness was reproduced. The gamma, which is responsible for the visibility of details in darker materials, was definitely boosted, causing details in the darkest parts of the screen to be invisible, disappearing into complete black (e.g., the bottom part of the screen in the comparison image - the area around the actress's ear). The situation was similar on the EOTF curve, which was below the correct value, suggesting that a similar issue may be encountered in 4K HDR content.

Thanks to our experience and the appropriate tools, we decided to take matters into our own hands and check how much could be extracted from this model after professional calibration. The details are described in the next section.

In Professional mode the Bravia 3 II delivers a fairly good level of colour reproduction straight out of the box. In SDR the most noticeable issue is a slightly low gamma, which makes the midtones a little brighter. The white balance isn't perfect either; as brightness increases a bit of blue and red drops away, so whites can sometimes appear a touch warmer with a faint greenish tint. These aren't mistakes that immediately jump out when watching a film. Average error values hover around 3, so the factory setup can be considered quite good. The situation in HDR is similar. Here too there's a slight lack of blue, so the picture is marginally warmer than the reference, but the difference isn't large enough to be distracting during normal viewing.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.2/10

8/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, TCL C75B has clearly improved when it comes to colour reproduction. Although the TV doesn't offer too many options for adjusting the white balance, we managed to improve its settings quite a bit. As a result, the image is no longer overly pink, and the colours now look much more natural and harmonious.

The gamma jump that was previously an issue hasn't completely disappeared, but we were able to significantly reduce it. This has made details in dark scenes more visible – both in HD and 4K HDR content.

Unfortunately, the lack of local dimming is still noticeable. The 'blooming black' effect remains, but that's a limitation of the display itself. Still, the colours post-calibration look significantly better, and the image is much more pleasant to watch.

After calibration you can get a lot out of SDR material. The white balance was set almost perfectly, gamma practically matches the reference value, and average colour errors fell from around 3 to about 1. That’s already the level at which differences from the reference image are very hard to spot in practice. The Bravia 3 II therefore shows that despite its place in Sony’s range it has quite a bit of potential for precise picture tuning. Improvement is also visible in HDR, although here you can’t avoid all the limitations of the TV itself. Once the colours are evened out it’s easier to notice that the EOTF curve in film material runs slightly below the reference value in places, meaning the Bravia 3 II gently darkens parts of the image. That isn’t ideal from a reference point of view, but in this particular TV it also has an advantage. With no local dimming and average black levels this behaviour slightly reduces the visibility of the backlight in darker scenes and helps preserve a stronger sense of contrast. You could say Sony is partly masking the limitations of the panel this way, rather than trying at all costs to stick to the reference brightness.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.2/10

9.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

When it comes to tonal transition fluidity, TCL C75B performs really well. It particularly excels in gradation of the darkest colours – here the television does not disappoint and presents a high-quality image.

Some imperfections can be noticed in the brightest areas of the screen, such as in a scene from the film Kingsman (sun in a blue sky). Nevertheless, the final effect should satisfy the vast majority of users.

In terms of the smoothness of tonal transitions, the Bravia 3 II performs very well. In most of the scenes we watched it was hard to notice any problems with the blending of individual shades. Gradients remain smooth both in the bright parts of the image, such as skies or sunsets, and in much more challenging dark shots. The only thing that may stand out in our photos, particularly in the very darkest scenes, is the unevenness of the backlight itself. However, this is not related to colour gradation; it is rather a consequence of using a backlight without local dimming.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

6/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

TCL C75B has a feature for smoothing tonal transitions, but unfortunately, we cannot praise it. Regardless of the selected level – low or high – tonal transitions in older materials remained visible, as if the feature wasn’t working at all. It’s hard to say anything positive about it, as in practice it seems completely useless.

Image scaling is better. The TV handles it quite decently, although on thinner elements, like branches in the background, you can see slight jaggedness. However, this is not something that significantly hinders everyday viewing.

Unfortunately, a bigger problem turned out to be overscan, or cropping of the image edges. In our tests, it happened that news ticker or other elements close to the edge of the screen were cut off. This is definitely something to pay attention to, especially if we use the TV for watching news programs or content with text on the screen.

Bravia 3 II is Sony's first TV to use the new MediaTek Pentonic 800 chip, and you can see a few changes in the image processing. Starting with the basics: the upscaling itself is decent. The TV can sensibly upscale lower-resolution material and doesn't have a strong tendency to over‑emphasise jagged edges or other source imperfections. With regular broadcast TV or lower-quality streaming material the picture therefore remains quite attractive.

We have more reservations about the digital image processing. In this model Sony has replaced the well-known "Smooth Gradation" function with a new setting called "Digital Noise Reduction". Its job is basically the same: to smooth out ugly tonal transitions and artifacts caused by heavy compression. Unfortunately, this function performs noticeably worse than before. At the "Large" setting (the only one that had any visible effect) the TV can smooth away too many image elements at once, which causes film grain to disappear and object textures or even skin to start looking unnatural. Worse still, the effect is not particularly stable. When there's more motion in a scene, the function's effect noticeably weakens and at times it looks as if the TV stops intervening in the image altogether. So for everyday viewing we wouldn't recommend using it at a high level. It can help on static shots, but the trade-off is often too much loss of detail.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.3/10

8.2/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
240Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
BFI function 120Hz
No
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
0%
25%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

TCL C75B definitely has something to offer gamers. The television is equipped with a panel that can display images with a refresh rate of 144 Hz in 4K, and even 240 Hz in Full HD. These are really impressive results, especially for a model from the budget range.

On top of that, there are features for improving smoothness and reducing motion blur in films. The "Motion" option allows for precise adjustment of the effect on a 10-point scale, providing significant personalisation possibilities – everyone can set the smoothness to their liking.

Motion handling is definitely one of the Bravia 3 II's strongest points. The TV uses a 120 Hz VA panel, a solution that by nature, despite the high refresh rate, doesn't always cope well with motion blur. Sony has, however, managed that issue very well here. Fast-moving objects remain sharp, and the characteristic motion trails and blur are reduced to a very low level, if not to zero. It's one of the least motion-blur-prone LCD TVs we've had the chance to test. Interestingly, in this respect the Bravia 3 II can even outperform the much more expensive flagship True RGB series, the Bravia 9 II.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

8.1/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 240Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

TCL C75B is undoubtedly a television designed with gamers in mind. It has almost everything needed for even the most demanding console users. With the implementation of full bandwidth HDMI 2.1, the TV supports features like ALLM (automatic low latency mode) and VRR (variable refresh rate) – operating within the full capabilities of the TV, up to 240 Hz in Full HD resolution.

Additionally, the television supports advanced HDR technologies, including Dolby Vision and HGiG, which allows for even better detailing in HDR-optimised games. C75B is also equipped with a very convenient interface for gamers in the form of Game Bar, where you can check all key parameters such as refresh rate, input lag, or picture settings – all just a click away.

In one sentence: C75B is a great choice for gamers, offering a wide range of features that fully enable enjoyment of the capabilities of modern consoles and games.

The Sony Bravia 3 II is a very good TV for gamers, although not everything has been solved the way we’d like. The biggest change concerns the connectors. For the first time in a Sony TV we get four full HDMI 2.1 ports with 48 Gb/s bandwidth, thanks to the new MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset. That removes one of the problems that has hung over this manufacturer’s TVs for years. You can connect several devices at once and on each input use the device’s full capabilities, including VRR and ALLM. There’s also a simple Game Bar that lets you check the key signal parameters and change a few useful settings, such as black level, when you want to improve visibility in darker parts of a game.

There are, however, two limitations worth knowing. The first is the lack of support for 1440p at 120 Hz. That won’t be an issue for everyone, but people using that resolution on a console or PC—for example to get higher frame rates in certain games—will have to choose 1080p. We have more reservations about HGiG support. Sony doesn’t let you disable tone mapping on the Bravia 3 II, so the TV keeps processing HDR even when you’d prefer to leave that task to the console. It’s easiest to spot during HDR setup—the checkerboard test pattern doesn’t disappear at the point where it should based on the TV’s actual capabilities. That doesn’t mean HDR in games will look bad. You just need to set up a little differently and, rather than relying on the pattern, manually set the peak brightness to about 450 nits. So the issue can be worked around, but you should know about it before you start configuring your console.

Input lag

9.8/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
17 ms
14 ms
1080p120
9 ms
8 ms
2160p60
17 ms
14 ms
2160p120
8 ms
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
17 ms
14 ms
2160p120
8 ms
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
19 ms
14 ms
2160p120 DV
11 ms
8 ms

The input lag on the TCL C75B is something that truly impresses. With a refresh rate of 144 Hz, the lag is just 9 ms, making the TV's response to our actions on the controller or keyboard practically instantaneous. For 60 Hz, the result is 19 ms – it's not a record low value, but it still falls within a range where the lag is practically unnoticeable during gaming. One could say that the difference is hardly felt, which makes this TV a good choice even for more demanding gamers.

In terms of input lag, the Bravia 3 II performs very well. With a 120 Hz signal latency is about 8 ms, while at 60 Hz it rises to around 14 ms, so in both cases the response to controls is very quick and during normal gameplay you’d be unlikely to notice any delay. It’s also worth noting the TV’s behaviour in Dolby Vision Gaming mode on Xbox. Input lag then remains practically just as low, and until recently Sony used to have a noticeable problem with this.

Compatibility with PC

7.6/10

7.2/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
8ms
8ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
240Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

TCL C75B is quite a good choice for connecting to a computer. With high refresh rates, low input lag, and G-Sync support, the television performs exceptionally well in games – both fast-paced and more demanding ones. The image is smooth, and the response to our actions is quick, which gamers will undoubtedly appreciate.

For office work, the television also holds up well. Text is readable, although on a dark background some imperfections can be noticed – some fonts appear as if they are missing pieces of vertical lines. This may be distracting if we work a lot with documents or text editing. However, if the computer is mainly used for gaming or watching movies, TCL C75B will easily serve its purpose as a monitor. It’s a versatile device that can handle most applications.

Working with a computer is generally good, although, again, not without a few caveats. The Bravia 3 II correctly handles chroma 4:4:4, so in typical use text and the system interface look sharp and legible. However, grey fonts can draw attention, since their vertical edges may be noticeably brighter than the horizontal ones. On the larger screen this isn't particularly bothersome, but if someone is considering the smaller Bravia 3 II as a monitor for text work, it's worth keeping in mind.

What bothers us more, though, is the lack of additional modes with increased refresh rates. It's not even about 144 or 165 Hz at 4K, but rather the option to get higher smoothness at Full HD. This solution is increasingly appearing in rival TVs (DLG 240Hz), while Sony still does not offer it, even in its pricier models. For most users, 4K at 120 Hz will of course be perfectly sufficient, especially for consoles. But those who also use the TV as a PC gaming monitor may feel somewhat disappointed.

Viewing angles

2.7/10

3.3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
86%
72%

The viewing angles on the TCL C75B are, unfortunately, very poor. This is a typical compromise with VA panels – better blacks at the expense of off-angle visibility. The picture quickly loses quality when viewed from the side, which is the complete opposite of what IPS panel televisions offer. If we plan to watch the TV mainly head-on, this won't be a big problem. However, with a larger number of viewers sitting at different angles, the picture quality may disappoint.

Viewing angles are fairly typical for a VA panel, meaning simply average and, for some, probably poor. The Bravia 3 II looks best when you're sitting directly in front of the screen. As you move to the side, colours start to lose saturation and blacks become greyer. That's unfortunately the price we pay for this panel's high native contrast. Watching with two or three people shouldn't be much of an issue, but with a wide sofa those sitting at the ends will notice a clearly worse image.

Daytime performance

4.9/10

5.8/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2): 447 cd/m2

TCL C75B: 366 cd/m2

TCL C75B performs okay during the day. The satin display somewhat limits reflections, but it's not an ideal solution. Brightness is also an issue – 350 cd/m² is simply not enough for comfortable viewing in a brightly sunlit room.

In less extreme conditions, for example, in a moderately lit room, the TV does alright. However, if the sun starts streaming directly onto the screen in summer, watching can become tiring. It's worth keeping this in mind when choosing this model.

During the day the Bravia 3 II performs quite well, although a lot depends on where you place the TV. The satin finish handles reflections reasonably — it doesn't act like a mirror, but strong light sources, particularly a window opposite the screen, can interfere with viewing. On the plus side, the VA panel keeps blacks fairly deep in daylight, so the image doesn't immediately look grey or washed out. The brightness of around 450 nits also helps, and the Bravia 3 II can sustain that regardless of how many bright elements are on-screen. That's more than enough for a typical living room and the picture remains readable during the day. However, if the TV will be placed in a very bright room with large windows and a lot of direct light, you can find models with noticeably more effective coatings and greater brightness headroom.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
v8-t653t01-lf1v412
6140200730
Image processor
mt5896 2,5gb ram
PENTONIC 800 4GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review TCL C75B TV Panel details
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV Panel details

TV features

6.6/10

7.9/10

  • System
    Google TV
    Google TV
  • System performance
    SystemResponsiveness-
    Good
  • HDMI inputs
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review TCL C75B TV features
Review TCL C75B TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features
Review SONY BRAVIA 3 II (XR35M2) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    Yes
  • Audio description
    No
    Yes

TCL C75B is a television that primarily relies on the Google TV system. The platform offers access to most popular apps, such as Netflix, YouTube, and Prime Video, making it great for watching content from the internet. However, it's worth mentioning that the system can sometimes stutter slightly, which may be noticeable during everyday use.

In terms of smart features, the C75B performs well. Voice control with the help of the built-in assistant works smoothly, and thanks to AirPlay and Miracast, we can easily transfer content from our phone or laptop. Bluetooth allows for effortless connection of headphones, controllers, or other devices.

However, anyone expecting classic television features may be disappointed. There is no option to record programmes on a USB drive or a picture-in-picture (PiP) feature. TCL has been skipping such features for some time, which may not appeal to users who mainly rely on traditional television.

Smart TV features: Google TV

Bravia 3 II runs Google TV and, in terms of capabilities, it’s one of the more fully featured systems you’ll find in TVs today. First and foremost, you get access to a very large number of apps, so beyond the most popular streaming platforms you’ll also find plenty of less obvious services. Sony also supports AirPlay and Chromecast, making it very convenient to cast content from a smartphone. Voice search is good too, powered by Gemini, which handles commands in many languages and can genuinely make using the TV easier. During our tests we did encounter one issue: Bravia 3 II wouldn’t reliably receive a picture from a Windows 11 PC over Miracast. So if you want to use the TV as a secondary screen for a computer, the most reliable solution remains a connection via HDMI.

Traditional TV features

Sony hasn’t forgotten people who still mainly watch regular television. Bravia 3 II supports recording programmes to USB with the ability to schedule them in advance via PVR, which is rare nowadays, especially in cheaper models. There’s also teletext and a clear channel guide, so in terms of basic TV functions we weren’t really missing anything, maybe apart from picture-in-picture (PiP). A curiosity is the two remotes included in the set. The first is modern and pared-back (non-backlit), while the other is a classic design with a full numeric keypad. Although it may look a little old-fashioned, viewers who watch a lot of traditional TV might actually find it more convenient, for example when entering channel numbers.

Apps

9.6/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.2/10

9.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
Yes
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in TCL C75B works really well. It handles most popular image and audio formats with ease. Although there are some shortcomings in the support of certain formats, thanks to Google TV, you can easily install an alternative player that will solve this issue.

The Bravia 3 II's built-in player works really well and, during our tests, handled most popular video and audio formats with no trouble. Basically, there's little that would make us install an additional player or use an external device. The only exception might be videos with subtitles saved in .txt format, which the TV doesn't support, but let's be honest, at this point that would be nitpicking.

Sound

6.6/10

6.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    87dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The sound on the TCL C75B is really pleasant, especially at lower volume levels. The bass is noticeable and complements the sound well, but only up to about 40% volume. At higher settings, problems start to arise – the bass causes unpleasant vibrations, and the speakers begin to crackle. If we plan to use higher volume levels more frequently, it’s worth considering purchasing a soundbar, as the built-in speakers may not meet more demanding situations.

Pod względem dźwięku Bravia 3 II wypada poprawnie, ale trudno powiedzieć o niej coś znacznie więcej. Głośniki dobrze radzą sobie z dialogami i zwykłą telewizją, natomiast zdecydowanie brakuje im niższych częstotliwości. Bas zaczyna szybko tracić energię, przez co przy muzyce, filmach akcji czy grach dźwięk jest dość lekki i brakuje mu uderzenia. Nie jest to oczywiście nic niezwykłego w telewizorach tej klasy, ale jeśli zależy nam na bardziej efektownym brzmieniu, soundbar będzie tutaj bardzo wskazanym dodatkiem.

Znacznie lepiej wygląda kwestia obsługiwanych formatów audio. Bravia 3 II radzi sobie praktycznie ze wszystkim, czego możemy potrzebować, włącznie z Dolby TrueHD, DTS-HD Master Audio czy DTS:X, a więc formatami coraz częściej pomijanymi przez innych producentów. Telewizor może również przesłać je dalej do zewnętrznego zestawu audio. Wyjątkiem jest Dolby Atmos zapisany w Dolby TrueHD, którego wbudowane głośniki nie odtworzą bezpośrednio, ale przy korzystaniu z odpowiedniego soundbara lub amplitunera nie powinno stanowić to większego problemu.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

87dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy