SHARP JP7765E vs LG OLED C6 (WOLED)

Direct comparison

JP7

C6 / C64 / C6E / C6H / C61

Info

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.2

8.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.4

    8.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.0

    8.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    3.9

    8.6

  • Gaming on console

    6.1

    9.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.0

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    7.3

    6.6

  • Utility functions

    6.4

    8.4

  • Apps

    9.6

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    7.0

Advantages

  • Good black and contrast – mini-LED backlighting with a VA panel

  • High brightness – will handle bright living rooms

  • Google TV system – unlimited app base and smart features

  • Very good file player – plays almost everything

  • Mini-jack output – rare and useful headphone connection

  • Extremely loud – up to 90 dB (ideal for seniors)

  • Very attractive price

  • Perfect blacks and OLED-level contrast

  • Very high HDR brightness, up to around 1,500 nits

  • Excellent picture quality in HDR films, including Dolby Vision

  • Very good image processing and upscaling

  • 165 Hz panel with virtually no motion blur

  • Great gaming package: VRR, G-Sync, HGiG, Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Very low input lag, about 5 ms at 120 Hz

  • Wide viewing angles

  • Intuitive, modern WebOS

  • Convenient control with the Magic Remote featuring a gyroscope

Disadvantages

No like
  • Massive trailing and only a 60Hz panel

  • Poor mini-LED local dimming algorithms

  • Narrow viewing angles (a natural characteristic of VA panels)

  • No VRR and HGiG – features for gamers

  • Odd sound – the audio has a "hole" in the dialogues

  • Different versions of the remote depending on the C6 variant, so before buying it's hard to be certain which Magic Remote will be included

  • Visible grain (dithering) around blacks, noticeable from close viewing distance

  • Average reflection handling, in a very bright living room strong reflections may be noticeable

  • No DTS:X support, for that format you'll need an external AV receiver or player

Our verdict

Sharp JP7765 is yet another offering in the market that tries to prove that Mini-LED technology doesn't have to cost a fortune. The low price is matched by an exceptionally high brightness – a peak of 1000 nits in HDR is a result that is simply impressive in this price range. Although the proprietary processor doesn't always handle backlighting management in demanding scenes perfectly, support for Dolby Vision effectively saves the day. With dynamic metadata, the picture becomes vivid, deep, and simply attractive to the eye. Adding to this the Google TV system, extreme volume, and a rarely found headphone jack, we have a device that is a brilliant option for seniors or less demanding viewers switching from a regular, cheap LCD. In such a scenario, the Sharp JP7 presents itself as a really good and cost-effective choice. However, it's necessary to state the matter clearly: contrary to marketing slogans, this isn't gear for everyone. Gamers or sports fans will definitely not find this suitable. The biggest drawback of the JP7765 model is the slow, 60Hz panel and significant motion blur, which essentially disqualifies this TV for watching fast-paced matches or playing quick titles. The image loses sharpness during rapid movements to such an extent that for a football or racing fan, this could be an unacceptable barrier.

So who is the Sharp JP7765 for? It's a sensible option for budget-conscious individuals who don't have high demands for motion fluidity but value a "kick" of brightness. By choosing the Sharp JP7, you'll definitely make a better deal than buying basic (non-dimming) TVs from competitors. At a similar price, rivals usually offer standard LCD panels that can't compete with the capabilities of even such a basic Mini-LED model as the JP7. Ultimately, it comes down to a simple equation: you accept poorer motion fluidity in exchange for immense brightness, which is hard to find with other manufacturers at this price.

The LG C6 is a very successful evolution of one of the market’s most popular OLEDs. The TV itself hasn’t changed drastically compared with last year’s C5; the look is very similar, webOS offers comparable features, and gamers again get pretty much everything you’d expect from a modern TV. You can’t really complain, since the C5 was already a very complete device in that respect. The most important change is where there was room for improvement: the panel itself. The new WOLED panel is noticeably brighter, and roughly 1500 nits in HDR makes it increasingly hard to see the C6 as just a ‘mid-range’ OLED. HDR movies look very impressive, blacks remain perfect, colours are very good, and the new processor, the same one found in the flagship G6, handles upscaling and lower-quality sources very well. There’s also a really strong offering for gamers. 165 Hz from a PC, VRR, G-Sync and very low input lag mean you can just as easily hook up a console as a powerful PC. During the day the C6 also performs better than previous generations, though of course in a very bright living room you’ll still find brighter TVs on the market. And it’s probably that versatility we like most about the C series. The C6 doesn’t try to be the best TV in every possible category, but it doesn’t really fall short in any. It’s suitable for movies, sport, gaming, regular TV and everyday streaming. If its price starts to fall after launch as it did with previous generations, it could be one of the most interesting OLEDs to buy in 2026.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
IR (remote)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Premium
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Silver
Silver
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.3/10

10/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 160 (10 x 16)

Contrast:

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

64,100:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

18,250:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

46,350:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

7,000:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

When it comes to what’s most important in Mini-LEDs, namely contrast and black levels, the Sharp JP7 in the 55-inch size we've tested uses a VA panel. Combined with backlighting divided into 160 zones (in a 10x16 layout), this promises really solid performance. Measurements on static film test patterns can be downright shocking, with reported contrast reaching five-digit values, even hitting levels of 50,000:1. On paper, this is a result that even much more expensive models would envy, and black levels under such conditions look very appealing.

Unfortunately, a TV is bought for watching movies, not for admiring static test patterns, and here the magic tends to fade. When something more begins to happen on the screen – especially in complex, dark scenes with a lot of small, bright elements – the backlight system in the JP7 starts to literally go haywire. Zones can "dance" before the viewer's eyes, flickering on and off in a manner that can be just plain annoying and distracts from the action. It is clear that Sharp has a huge area for improvement regarding local dimming management. The hardware potential in the form of Mini-LEDs is substantial, but the control algorithms clearly struggle to tame them.

If it’s about black levels, there’s not much to discuss. The LG C6 uses an OLED panel, so each pixel can be completely turned off. The result is what you’d expect: perfect black, very high contrast and no haloing around bright elements. You can see this clearly in night scenes, where single lamps, text or other bright points appear against a very dark background. The C6 handles them without any trouble and there are none of the limitations typical of Mini LED TVs with local dimming. Interestingly, in this respect it doesn’t matter whether we’re talking about this C6 or the more expensive Tandem OLED variant. When it comes to black levels themselves, both TVs perform practically identically. The differences between them are mainly in brightness and colours.

NOTE: In the helicopter scene from Sicario 2 we noticed graininess and flickering in the darkest parts of the image. It looks like a software bug that LG should fix with an update. On the Tandem OLED version the issue is even more noticeable, and we observed similar behaviour on the flagship LG G6.

HDR effect quality

5.3/10

7.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 94.0%, Bt.2020: 70.1%
DCI P3: 99.5%, Bt.2020: 75.7%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

1014 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

247 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

606 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

180 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

605 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1489 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1288 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1527 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1345 nit

Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

649 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG OLED C6 (WOLED)

SHARP JP7765E

Luminance of RGB colors

So how does the brightness of the Sharp JP7 perform in the most demanding titles? Honestly, we were quite surprised at first. The TV is able to achieve over 1000 nits of brightness, which is an outstanding and rare result for a device costing just under 2000 zł (for 55 inches). Watching bright, full-screen scenes, you can get the impression that you are dealing with really good equipment. But unfortunately, we have to return to the issue we mentioned earlier, which is local dimming management. When small, bright spots appear on a dark background (like in test scenes from the films Life of Pi or Sicario 2), it’s clear how poorly the JP7 handles these zones. The TV dims them almost to the maximum, crushing the whole HDR effect, which at such moments resembles a flat SDR image (less than 200 nits). This instability means that in demanding, contrast-rich films, the image on the JP7 unfortunately loses its appeal.

As a consolation, it's worth noting that the panel has the potential to display colours well. A PFS (phosphor) filter has been employed here, which allows the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut to reach a solid 94%. The manufacturer calls its product a “QLED,” even though it technologically relies mainly on the aforementioned PFS filter. Considering the recent market battles between manufacturers over what can and cannot be called QLED, we leave the issue of the correctness of this terminology to your judgement. However, it remains a fact that the potential for reproducing saturated colours in this panel is simply good.

The HDR performance of the LG C6 is really very good. LG Display’s new WOLED panel has mainly brought a significant increase in brightness. In our unit we measured around 1500 nits and, importantly, the TV can show similar values in many normal movie scenes as well. That gives HDR real punch. Bright highlights, lamps and sunlight can be genuinely intense, and most HDR movies simply look very impressive. Of course it’s still an OLED, so brightness falls in scenes with a lot of white. The fifth scene from the movie The Meg illustrates this well, where the C6 reached around 600 to 700 nits. That’s still a very good result, but it also shows the new panel hasn’t shed all the limitations typical of OLEDs.

Colours

When it comes to colours, it’s also hard to raise major objections. The C6 covers about 99% of the DCI-P3 gamut and roughly 75% of BT.2020. In practice colours are very saturated and, importantly, stable regardless of the scene. That’s worth emphasising, because not every TV behaves the same in this respect. In some RGB Mini LED models colour saturation can depend more strongly on image brightness. A wider colour gamut today is mainly offered by QD-OLED TVs and new SQD models with a new generation of quantum dots. However, the C6 still performs very strongly here and is able to produce suitably saturated colours in most movie scenes.

Factory color reproduction

4/10

7.8/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

When it comes to colours straight out of the box, the Sharp JP7 was tested in the Film mode, which traditionally offers the most cohesive image compared to the yellowed “Eco” mode or the glaring blue of the “Dynamic” mode. Although this is the best choice among the available settings, the results still fall short of ideal. The white balance clearly lacked red and blue components, causing many scenes to take on an unnatural, greenish hue. Another issue was the gamma – in full-screen scenes, the TV produced excessively bright images, completely robbing it of its cinematic character. All of this resulted in colour reproduction errors, especially in shades of grey, which exceeded the Delta E 10 value. To remind you: errors above 2-3 are already noticeable to the human eye, so here we are dealing with a significant distortion of reality.

In HDR mode, the situation is reversed, but not in a better way. Here, the white balance is dominated by blue, giving the image an unnatural, almost “store-like” sharpness, reminiscent of aggressive demonstration modes. Moreover, the measurements of the EOTF curve emphasise the store-like nature of the image. The graph clearly shows that the TV generates images that are significantly brighter than the standards predict, resulting in an artificially boosted and unrealistic final effect. The Sharp JP7 is evidently trying to appear stronger than it actually is, but it does so at the expense of fidelity to the original content.

Right out of the box the LG C6 is quite well set up, especially if you choose the Filmmaker mode. In SDR material the white balance is decent, although as brightness increases there is a slight lack of red. The image becomes a bit cooler, but not enough for it to be very noticeable during normal viewing. More is happening in the brightness characteristic. Gamma is a little low and instead of holding at 2.4, for a large part of the range it sits closer to 2.1–2.2. In practice the C6 slightly brightens midtones. Shadows are therefore more readable, but the image loses some depth compared with how it should look in a darkened room.

In HDR the situation is a bit more interesting. The start of the greyscale looks very good, but from about 20–30% brightness the white balance starts to drift increasingly. As brightness rises there is more red and a noticeable lack of blue. In the brightest sections the difference is already significant and also affects the reproduction of some colours. The EOTF curve itself is followed quite well through most of the range. The C6 only tends to slightly brighten the image, which we also saw in our film comparisons. The largest deviation appears around the brightest parts, where the TV starts adapting the signal to the panel's capabilities.

The factory Filmmaker setting in HDR is therefore not perfect, but overall performs well. The biggest area for improvement is the white balance, especially at high brightness.

Color reproduction after calibration

6.7/10

9.1/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

We subjected the JP7 to our standard calibration procedure and honestly... the television gained a second life thanks to it, especially with SDR content (YouTube, traditional television, series, or older films). With our precise adjustments to the white balance and stabilisation of the gamma, colour errors dropped to a value of below 3. This is a level at which the human eye struggles to perceive discrepancies. In this scenario, the Sharp JP7 delivers an image with truly excellent colour accuracy, which is a significant advantage in this price range. However, the HDR content turned out to be much more problematic. Here, despite our efforts and interventions in the settings, the television simply refused to cooperate. In the JP7 menu, we won’t find any option to effectively control how brightness is managed (EOTF). Although a significant portion of the colour errors has been reduced, the image still remained unnaturally oversaturated. It’s a bit disappointing because the potential of the mini-LED backlit panel is great, but the software presents a clear barrier.

The conclusion is simple: when watching less demanding content (SDR) on the JP7, you can expect an image that is more than satisfactory, but in HDR you will have to accept a certain degree of "artificiality" that cannot be bypassed even with professional equipment.

LG TVs have long responded very well to calibration, and the C6 is no exception. After adjustments we managed to set the white balance practically perfectly, and most colour errors fell below 3, often down to around 2. In practice this means very accurate colour reproduction in both SDR and HDR. An interesting detail only appeared with the HDR brightness response. On a classic EOTF chart everything looks almost perfect and at first glance it would be hard to find fault. Only when we measured the TV’s behaviour using filters based on real film scenes did it become clear that the C6 has a slight tendency to artificially boost image brightness.

It’s not a huge difference and many viewers may even see it as a positive, because HDR looks a bit more striking as a result. From the point of view of fidelity to the source material, however, it’s not ideal — some scenes are simply a touch brighter than the filmmaker intended. Interestingly, this is rather unusual for LG. In previous generations the brand’s TVs typically held very closely to the reference picture curve after calibration. The C6 is still very close to the standard, but that subtle brightness 'boost' can indeed be noticed in films and TV series.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

When it comes to image clarity, posterisation on the Sharp JP7 fortunately doesn’t distract too much from the content being viewed. In most scenes, it’s hard to spot annoying stripes or the so-called “jaggies” of colour, which often ruin the experience during scenes with smooth colours. Of course, you can't expect miracles here, as in some extremely demanding scenes, a trained eye might notice issues in the tonal transitions. However, it’s not at a level that would realistically distract during a film. Well, unless you have good eyesight and are looking for artefacts on the screen – then you’ll probably find something.

LG C6 handles tonal transitions very well. In most film scenes it was hard to notice obvious posterization problems. Both in dark parts of the image and in bright gradations the colours remain relatively smooth and do not break up into visible bands. That's very good news, because WOLED panels have not always been perfect in this respect. In the C6 it's noticeably better and during normal viewing this aspect of the picture shouldn't draw attention to itself.

One drawback, however, is dithering visible in near-black areas. Up close you can notice slight flicker and graininess in the darkest parts of the image. It's not as pronounced as on the Tandem OLED panel version, but it still occurs, so in this category we decided to deduct a few points from the C6.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

3.5/10

8.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

When it comes to lower quality materials and how Sharp JP7 handles them, the situation is ambiguous. Let's start with the upscaling itself – here we have no major objections. The process of scaling the image to a higher resolution is correct; the picture remains readable and clear, without the overscan effect, which means no cropped edges. Of course, it's not at the level of top models and at times you can notice slight tearing on the edges, but in this price range, the effect is fully acceptable.

However, the actual digital image processing performs much worse, as aside from the scaling, it practically doesn’t exist. In the JP7 menu, we won’t find any options that would effectively smooth out unwanted tonal transitions or reduce noise in the image. As a result, the signal hits the panel in a very raw form, which with heavily compressed materials (e.g., from YouTube) results in noticeable posterisation. Either this is a programming error or a very strange design decision, because in earlier Sharp models this function was available and, more importantly, worked with noticeable effect. Here, we are stuck with what the source delivers, without any digital support from the image processor.

Here the LG C6 has taken a really big step forward. The TV uses the same processor found in the flagship G6, and in terms of image processing the two models are very close. That's a big plus, because in this area LG's processor this year performs excellently. The "Smooth Gradation" function works particularly well. With heavily compressed material it can effectively hide ugly tonal banding and artefacts that often appear, for example, in lower-quality streaming. It's best to leave it on the "Low" setting. Then the improvement is clear, and the TV doesn't yet start blurring fine detail. Higher levels smooth the image more aggressively, but can already remove some of the natural texture of objects on screen. Upscaling itself also performs very well. Lower-resolution content is properly sharpened, edges look clean, and the processor quite effectively reconstructs fine details. In that respect the C6 is really close to LG's best TVs and the differences compared with the G6 are small.

Blur and motion smoothness

2/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
165Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
-
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
-
-
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (4K@165Hz):

The motion fluidity on the Sharp JP7 is quite average, and the reason is simple: the TV uses a 60Hz panel. This immediately makes it hard to recommend for watching sports or serious gaming, where higher refresh rates are already the standard. The only real plus is the presence of a motion smoother, which we can control in films with a slider called De-judder. Lower settings give a more raw, “cinematic” (framey) image, while higher ones add artificial fluidity. We suggest setting it somewhere in the middle of the scale, around 3-5 – this is the best compromise to avoid the soap opera effect while also getting rid of the annoying image skipping. Interestingly, in the menu, we also find a slider for "motion blur reduction," which usually indicates the presence of a 120Hz panel. However, in the case of the JP7, it doesn’t actually enhance the image and serves more as a dummy – it looks good in the settings, but technically it shouldn’t work on this panel.

The LG C6 features a panel with a maximum refresh rate of 165 Hz, which is great news especially for gamers using a powerful PC. For movies, sport and consoles we’ll of course be limited to 120 Hz at most, but even then it’s hard to fault the motion clarity. As you’d expect from an OLED, the panel’s response time is near-instant. Moving objects therefore don’t leave the characteristic smearing you still see on LCD TVs. This is especially noticeable in sport and fast-paced games, where the picture remains very clean even during dynamic movement.

For movies and TV, LG has also included a motion smoothing system called TruMotion. In the user settings you’ll find two separate sliders. De-Judder is primarily for low-frame-rate material, namely movies and TV series at 24 fps. You can use it to slightly reduce the characteristic judder or increase it if you prefer a much smoother picture. De-Blur, on the other hand, is useful for higher-frame-rate content, mainly sports broadcasts and 50/60 fps TV.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4/10

10/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    40 - 165Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

As we mentioned earlier, the 60Hz panel is not a feature that will attract gamers to the Sharp JP7. Perhaps for the casual gamer, whose console still generates most titles at 60 frames per second, there might be something interesting? When it comes to specific additions, we find here:

  • ALLM mode: Automatically switches the TV to low latency game mode (input lag).

  • Player menu: Which is hard to call a fully-fledged “Game Bar,” as the functionality is minimal. Aside from enabling ALLM, there’s only a dedicator for gaming which we advise against as it introduces very noticeable artifacts and spoils responsiveness.

  • Dolby Vision Gaming: For Microsoft's consoles.

Unfortunately, the list of shortcomings is much longer and more painful than the positives. The biggest disappointment is the lack of support for 120Hz, even when reducing the resolution to Full HD. The presence of 120Hz would allow for performance modes to be activated in many games on the PS5 or Xbox Series X. Another shortcoming is the VRR, which means that during frame drops, we are susceptible to screen tearing. Very problematic is also the lack of proper implementation of the HGiG standard. This results in the fact that during HDR calibration in the console menu, it is very easy to "overshoot" the brightness settings. As a result, instead of clear details in the highlights, we end up with an unnaturally oversaturated image with cut-off details. The Sharp JP7 is a proposal only for those who game very occasionally.

LG has long focused heavily on gamers, and the C6 essentially lacks nothing important. The TV supports 4K at 120 Hz from consoles, and when connected to a PC it can even run at 165 Hz. On top of that there’s VRR from 40 to 165 Hz, ALLM and a properly functioning HGiG. Another big plus is support for Dolby Vision in games, so the Xbox Series X can use that format without giving up game mode. The package is rounded out by the Game Bar, which lets you quickly check key signal parameters and change settings without leaving your game. In terms of features alone, the C6 is one of those TVs it’s really hard to fault. Whether you play on PlayStation, Xbox or PC, practically everything you could expect from a modern gaming TV is available here.

Input lag

9.3/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
14 ms
1080p120
29 ms
5 ms
2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
22 ms
2160p120 DV
14 ms

The issue of input lag in the Sharp JP7 is quite intriguing. In all 60Hz modes, the TV boasts a mere 13 ms result. This is truly an excellent result, making the lag practically unnoticeable during gameplay. In this regard, Sharp has risen to the occasion, and even in dynamic titles, the controls remain responsive.

However, during our tests, we encountered a certain technical conundrum. Using our professional Murideo generator, we were able to force and measure input lag at 120Hz refresh rate in Full HD resolution. This sounds promising, but in reality, it is merely a 'paper' curiosity, as standard external devices like consoles or computers were unable to coax the Sharp into operating in that mode. Although professional diagnostic tools see some hidden potential here, for the end user, the JP7 remains just a 60Hz screen.

In terms of input lag the C6 performs like a good gaming TV should. At 120 Hz we measured about 5 ms, so controller input is practically instantaneous. At 60 Hz the result increases to around 14 ms, but that's still a good figure. Latency is a bit higher in Dolby Vision. At 120 Hz it's about 14 ms, and at 60 Hz roughly 22 ms. In practice, during normal Xbox gameplay this isn't something that will really bother you.

Compatibility with PC

5/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
13ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RWBG
Max refresh rate
60Hz
165Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Sharp JP7 performs moderately as a monitor. While the readability of standard fonts on a white or black background is acceptable, the clarity significantly drops with darker and thinner text, making it difficult to work with text for extended periods. For occasional browsing of news in the browser, this panel is sufficient; however, we definitely do not recommend it as a permanent screen for PC gaming. Besides the rigid limit of 60Hz, the television does not support any form of frame synchronization (no G-Sync or FreeSync), which combined with the significant motion blur of the panel makes the user experience in dynamic scenarios quite poor.

The C6 also performs very well when connected to a computer. The TV correctly supports 4:4:4 chroma, so text, icons and other small UI elements are displayed clearly. You can therefore use it not only for gaming but also for regular work in Windows without much trouble. A limitation is the four‑subpixel panel layout. If you sit really close to the screen, you might notice slight coloured fringing on the edges of some fonts. It isn’t particularly bothersome and becomes practically invisible from a normal viewing distance.

The C6 also has a lot to offer PC gamers. From a PC you can use the full 165 Hz, and it also supports G-Sync, VRR and very low input lag, which is around 5 ms at the maximum refresh rate. Combined with the OLED’s lightning-fast response time, this delivers a very smooth, clean image with no visible motion blur. So if you plan to connect a powerful PC to the C6, the TV can comfortably serve as a large gaming monitor and will also work quite well for everyday productivity.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

7.4/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
77%
33%

Sharp JP7 uses a VA panel, which automatically means narrow viewing angles. It's a classic compromise: we get quite good blacks and contrast, but at the cost of image degradation when viewed from the side. At an angle, the colours clearly fade and wash out, losing their saturation, so the JP7 is definitely a device for watching "straight on," rather than from the corner of the couch.

Viewing angles on the LG C6 are very good and actually rank among the best you can currently find in TVs. This is largely due to the OLED panel itself. Even if you sit well off to one side, the picture still retains good contrast and the colours don't lose much saturation. That makes the C6 very well suited to a larger living room, where not everyone sits directly in front of the screen. Only at very extreme angles can you notice slight colour shifts, but during normal viewing it's hard to count that as any real issue. In this respect, really only Samsung Display's QD-OLED panels perform better.

Daytime performance

7.3/10

6.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

LG OLED C6 (WOLED): 469 cd/m2

SHARP JP7765E: 708 cd/m2

The satin coating applied in the Sharp JP7 quite effectively reduces reflections, although it’s still far from being fully matte. The real 'gamechanger' in bright rooms, however, is the brightness of the device itself in SDR content. With an average result of 700 nits and peaks around 1000 nits, this is an exceptional performance in the segment under 2000 PLN. Thanks to such high luminance, the television can easily handle even brightly lit living rooms. One just has to watch out for direct reflections, for instance from a window opposite, because the satin used here won’t eliminate them completely, but at this brightness, the picture will remain legible.

The LG C6 has a glossy panel that handles direct reflections quite well, but it doesn’t eliminate them completely. If there’s a large window or a bright lamp facing the TV, their reflections will still be visible. On the other hand, the screen preserves blacks well in a lit room and even during the day the picture doesn’t go grey or washed out. The C6 is also fairly bright in SDR. With typical content we measured around 470 nits, so in most living rooms it should cope during the day without much trouble. Brightness only starts to fall off more noticeably when a large part of the screen is white. That’s still a typical characteristic of OLEDs and it becomes noticeable with very bright content, for example winter sports. Overall, the C6 performs well in a normally lit living room. However, if the TV is going to sit opposite huge windows and spend most of the day fighting strong sunlight, a bright Mini LED will still be the better choice.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED PFS LED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
UKN4.250714.091
43.11.77
Image processor
MT5896 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review SHARP JP7765E TV Panel details
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV Panel details

SHARP JP7765E

LG OLED C6 (WOLED)

TV features

6.4/10

8.4/10

  • System
    Google TV
    WebOS
  • System performance
    Decent
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
    IR (remote)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV features
Review LG OLED C6 (WOLED) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    No
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Smart TV Features - Google TV

The main advantage of the Sharp JP7 is the Google TV system, which currently offers the widest access to apps on the market. The library is almost limitless – from all popular streaming services to niche VOD solutions and multimedia players. The system provides significant freedom for personalisation and access to the latest versions of popular platforms. In the package, we receive a Bluetooth remote that allows for the use of the built-in voice assistant without the need to point at the television. The only notable shortcoming in the multimedia area that we encountered is the lack of support for AirPlay. Apple device users, such as iPhone or iPad owners, will not be able to wirelessly stream images directly to the screen of this Sharp.

Classic Features and Connections

Regarding traditional TV functions, the Sharp JP7 does not offer anything that goes beyond the market standard. There is no option to record programs to external storage (PVR) or a dual tuner, which excludes the use of picture-in-picture (PiP) functionality. The television provides only basic solutions such as teletext and the ability to wirelessly connect accessories via Bluetooth.

As for connections, the Sharp JP7 offers 4 HDMI ports, which the manufacturer proudly describes as standard 2.1. However, let's make this clear: this is purely a marketing move, as in practice these ports offer only full functionality of standard 2.0 due to the limitations of the television. On the plus side, it is worth noting the presence of a classic mini-jack headphone output, which allows connection of older audio systems or speakers without the need for adapters or HDMI eARC standard. This is a rather rare and very practical addition nowadays.

Smart TV – webOS

Regardless of which C6 variant you come across, the set of features remains the same. The heart of the television is, of course, webOS, the system LG has been developing for many years. It runs quickly, is well optimised and, above all, provides access to practically all popular apps. Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video, YouTube, Max and other streaming services — in this respect it is hard to find major gaps. The system itself also offers a lot of extra options. There is AirPlay, easy screen casting from a smartphone, control of smart home devices and the ability to personalise the home screen. LG has been significantly expanding webOS for several generations and at times the number of available tabs or recommendations can be a little overwhelming (especially with ads in the background), but once you get used to it the system is convenient and, most importantly, works smoothly.

Classic television features

The C6 also handles being used as a normal television very well, not just as a screen for Netflix. Terrestrial TV support, the programme guide and channel switching all work smoothly and there is little to complain about. LG still offers the ability to record programmes to USB, so in terms of traditional features the equipment is really comprehensive. In fact we only miss two things here. The first is PiP, the ability to display two video sources at the same time. The second is a backlight for the remote, which would be particularly useful for evening viewing. Apart from that, the C6 has pretty much everything you can expect from a modern television.

Magic Remote: DIFFERENT VERSIONS

When buying the C6 it is worth paying attention to the remote, because LG has caused a bit of confusion here. During our tests we had, among others, the C64 variant, commonly found in large retail chains. The set included the new, much smaller Magic Remote Slim. It has fewer buttons and looks decidedly more modern, but still retains two of LG remotes' most distinctive features: the scroll wheel and cursor control by moving the remote. The C6E we tested, on the other hand, was equipped with the older, larger version of the Magic Remote. It works essentially the same, but has a classic numeric keypad and many more physical buttons. It looks less modern, but some people — especially those used to traditional remotes — may find it more convenient. So there is no single answer as to which remote is better. The new one is smaller, simpler and decidedly more contemporary; the older one offers faster access to a larger number of functions without having to navigate through menus. It's worth knowing that depending on the C6 marking, you may find one or the other variant in the box.

Apps

9.6/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.4/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
Yes
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

When it comes to multimedia support from external sources, the Sharp JP7 simply excels. The built-in player is a real surprise, as it handled almost every file format we supplied. It even managed to support the HEIC format (mainly used in Apple devices) without any issues, which many TVs struggle with. Here, Sharp displayed the photos without the slightest hitch. Of course, a significant advantage is the presence of the Google TV system, which allows the installation of external apps like VLC or Kodi in case of any problems. However, in our opinion, this would be an unnecessary step as the factory player is refined and versatile enough to satisfy even the most demanding users.

During our tests the TV handled virtually all of the most popular video formats we copied onto a USB stick without any problems. There were no issues with high bitrates, subtitles or more demanding files, so it's hard to criticise it on that front. The only exception was material with a DTS audio track. That's not surprising, because the TV simply doesn't support that codec. Otherwise, the built-in player is good enough that most users will be fine without installing external apps or connecting an additional player.

Sound

6/10

7/10

  • Maximum volume
    89dB
    88dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The sound coming from the JP7765E model can be described as unusual, and even – looking at our measurements – quite peculiar. The first thing that stands out is the massive scale of volume. The TV can reach levels of almost 90 decibels (89 dBC on the chart), which is a record result in this class. Such strong "loudness" is sure to appeal to seniors or those who need a device with very high audibility.

However, a glance at the frequency chart explains why the sound seems so "weird." The characteristic is extremely uneven: we have solid boosts in the lower registers (around 200 Hz) and in the high tones, but the mid-range – where most of the information about the human voice lies (between 500 Hz and 1.5 kHz) – experiences a huge drop. This makes the sound unnatural and can seem "withdrawn" at key moments of dialogues.

On the plus side, there is support for the Dolby Atmos format. However, it must be honestly admitted that to truly feel the potential of this system, connecting at least a decent soundbar will be necessary. The JP7's own speakers, despite being very loud, are unable to convey the cinematic depth and precision required by this standard.

In terms of sound the C6 is practically unchanged from last year’s C5. It still uses a 2.2-channel setup with a total output of 40 W, so a somewhat more solid base than many TVs that rely on simple 2.0 20 W arrangements. In practice the sound is quite good. Dialogue is clear, it doesn’t sound overly flat, and the additional speakers deliver a bit more bass than many basic TVs. Of course it still won’t replace a good soundbar, let alone a home theatre, but it’s more than enough for everyday TV viewing.

There’s a small step backwards, however, in the settings. LG removed some of the preset sound modes this year, which makes it a bit harder to tailor the sound to your preferences than on the previous generation. For that reason our rating is slightly lower, although the speakers’ capabilities remain practically unchanged. On the plus side it supports Dolby Atmos, the most popular surround-sound format in films and streaming right now. DTS support is still missing, which may matter mainly to people using their own movie libraries on discs or files.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

89dBC (Max)

75dBC

88dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy