Sharp GR8 is a television created primarily for those who expect an exceptionally smooth image. It is essentially the successor to the FQ8 model, and it's clear that the manufacturer has heavily focused on the aspect of motion dynamics. 144 Hz makes a difference – and not just in games. Sports broadcasts can also look fantastic, without those annoying blurring or "choppiness" that can take the joy out of watching. In terms of image quality, Sharp opted for a VA panel. While it doesn't feature local dimming, you can still count on pleasant contrast. Additionally, there's Dolby Vision, which gives evening movie screenings depth – even if the TV doesn't reach the brightness claimed by the manufacturer. It must be said that when the lights in the room are dimmed, the overall look is really pleasing to the eye. One of the biggest advantages of the GR8 is Google TV. We have access to a full range of applications, voice search in Polish, and a simple, intuitive interface. This means we don't have to limit ourselves to the standard TV functions, as there is always the option to install additional programs and tailor the system to our own needs. Of course, a few things could have been polished. The declared HDR brightness is higher on paper than in reality, which may leave the most discerning cinema enthusiasts feeling unsatisfied. Moreover, a few useful features known from other models are missing: there’s no USB recording or PiP functionality, and Apple device owners will be disappointed by the lack of AirPlay. Nevertheless, this is a television mainly aimed at those who value smooth visuals and high refresh rates. If we primarily care about dynamic gameplay and good support for games, while wanting to quietly enjoy a film in the evenings with pleasing quality, the Sharp GR8 should meet those expectations.
Philips OLED811 is a mid-range OLED for 2026 that stands out from its biggest rivals mainly for one thing: Ambilight. The light that follows the picture and spreads across the wall can change the mood of the whole viewing experience. In the evening the screen seems to extend beyond its frame and watching gains an extra bit of charm. For some it will be a pleasant extra, for others a decisive reason to pick Philips again. The picture itself is very comparable to what models like the LG C6 or Samsung S90H offer when using the same panel type. You get deep, perfect blacks that make bright elements really pop. The OLED811 can deliver strong HDR and, importantly, after calibration the picture is close to the reference. There’s no big advantage over the competition, but there’s also no sense that by choosing Philips for Ambilight you’re sacrificing image quality.
Gamers also get a few solid upgrades over last year’s model. Thanks to the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset we finally have four HDMI 2.1 ports, so connecting several devices, for example consoles, a PC and a soundbar, no longer means you have to decide which one gets the full capabilities of the port. Gaming itself is very enjoyable — the TV responds quickly, supports variable refresh rate, and from a PC it allows gaming in 4K at 165 Hz. It’s a pity the new processor’s capabilities haven’t been put to equally good use when processing lower-quality sources. The biggest doubts, however, concern the operating system. Titan OS replaced the popular Google TV and, although it has clearly developed over the past year, it’s still hard to call the change a good one. True, the system runs more smoothly, has more useful features, and its library already includes most popular streaming services. Still, the choice of apps is much smaller than Google’s (or the competition’s), and in our view that remains the OLED811’s biggest drawback. People using less popular services may feel that difference particularly strongly.
Is it worth buying? Yes, if Titan OS meets your needs. In terms of picture and the gaming features, the OLED811 has as much to offer as its rivals, but Ambilight gives it something others don’t. Philips therefore gives and takes a bit. It adds a unique viewing atmosphere but limits freedom of app choice. If the services you use are available, this compromise may be worth accepting.