Samsung U8000F (IPS) vs Philips OLED820

Direct compare

U8000F / U8092F

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”77”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3810x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.4

8.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.9

    8.3

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    4.8

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.8

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.3

    9.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    6.5

  • Watching in bright light

    3.4

    5.7

  • Utility functions

    5.3

    6.8

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.7

    7.7

Advantages

  • Advanced Smart system: Tizen

  • Good viewing angles (IPS Matrix)

  • Great for working with text - excellently displays fonts

  • Low input lag

  • Basic features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Perfect contrast and black level thanks to the WOLED panel

  • High HDR brightness (up to 1300 nits) and wide coverage of the DCI-P3 colour space (99%)

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Excellent motion smoothness, no blur, refresh rate up to 144 Hz

  • Full support for gamers: HDMI 2.1 (2 ports), VRR, ALLM, HGiG, Dolby Vision in games, low input lag

  • Ambilight, which significantly enhances the viewing experience and sets the TV apart from the competition

  • Google TV system with a massive app base and an excellent voice assistant

  • Extras including: Backlit remote and swivel stand

  • Support for audio formats Dolby Atmos and DTS:X

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness

  • Very poor black level and contrast (IPS panel)

  • Inferior appearance compared to its predecessor

  • Infrared remote control

  • Only two HDMI 2.1 ports (with 2 consoles and a soundbar, we are forced to "juggle" the cables)

  • Lack of many classic "TV" features such as USB recording or PiP mode, infrared remote may be annoying

  • Slight issues with colour matching (much better than last year but still far from the competition)

  • Issues with font readability when working with PC (lack of full Chroma 4:4:4 support)

Our verdict

The U8000F is a very basic television that may find its buyers among those looking for the cheapest Samsung 4K with Smart TV. And that is exactly its purpose. Thanks to the Tizen system, this model offers quite a bit in terms of smart features – the number of applications and possibilities may catch the attention of those who want a reasonably smart device at the lowest price possible. When it comes to picture quality – it's average, which isn't surprising in this class. Nonetheless, there are a few upsides: quite decent viewing angles will work well for traditional TV viewing from different parts of the room, and the basic features for gamers (like VRR and ALLM) may be enough for typical "Sunday" gamers. The PC mode also deserves a mention – the television handles font display very well, so it can also serve as a cheap monitor. Of course, this is not a model that can be recommended to everyone "sight unseen." But if someone is looking for a cheap Samsung with 4K resolution and a solid Smart system, then the U8000F is just that kind of device.

The Philips OLED820 is a very successful and significant step forward compared to last year's model, the OLED 819. For many people, the main reason for purchasing will, of course, be Ambilight: a multicoloured backlighting system that distinguishes Philips televisions from the competition. It's no surprise, as it made a huge impression on us as well. It’s not just an impressive gadget, but a real addition that can change the perception of the content being watched and add depth to it. However, Ambilight should not overshadow what the OLED820 offers as a screen. We have almost infinite contrast, high brightness in HDR films, and excellent colour reproduction, which becomes even better after a slight adjustment or professional calibration. This set guarantees one of the best images available on the market today, and we are also aware that the television offers something unique and unprecedented anywhere else. It is also equipment that will perform well in gaming. The 144 Hz panel and HDMI 2.1 ports provide access to the full capabilities of next-generation consoles, and the low input lag makes gameplay exceptionally responsive. The operating system – Google TV – also deserves praise. It’s a much better solution than the proprietary Titan OS found in lower Philips models, such as the OLED770. This is a significant argument for paying extra for this model. A larger library of applications, a more efficient voice assistant, and fewer system errors translate to a clearly better everyday experience. Of course, the Philips OLED 820 is not free from minor shortcomings – there are some software gaps, and some features could be better refined. Nevertheless, the overall presentation is very solid. Perhaps the OLED820 is not a revolutionary television, but it is a very successful and well-balanced offering in Philips' lineup. It combines excellent picture quality, a full set of features for gamers, and a unique addition in the form of Ambilight. If you are looking for a solid mid-range OLED that gives not only a good picture but also something distinctive and exceptional, the OLED820 should be high on your shopping list.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Premium
Stand type
Legs
Central
Stand type
stand-type-Black
stand-type-Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Swivel
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

1.1/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

700:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

700:1

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

650:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Samsung U8000F, or more precisely the U8092F model in the 55-inch version, is equipped with an IPS panel. Let’s be honest – this is not the best choice when it comes to properly displaying blacks and contrast. The results in this category are simply poor. The contrast is abysmal, and watching dark scenes with any kind of “cinematic” effect is nearly impossible. Additionally, the fact that the TV lacks local dimming doesn’t help, making it difficult to achieve better results. The only thing that deserves praise is the quite decent uniformity of the panel – but that’s more of a minor consolation. Overall, it’s not good. If you care about deep blacks and reasonable contrast, it’s definitely better to go for a variant with a VA panel, which performs significantly better in this particular series.

Contrast and black are the domain of OLEDs, and the Philips OLED820 is no exception. The WOLED panel from LG Display works exactly like the models LG C5 or Samsung S90F and delivers precisely what we expect – perfect black and infinite contrast. Whether we're watching challenging scenes full of fine details or simpler shots drenched in uniform black, the television always performs superbly. It separates light from dark with surgical precision, creating an extraordinary sense of depth in the image. And while there can be discussions about different technologies, in this category OLED simply rules, and the Philips OLED820 only confirms this rule.

HDR effect quality

3/10

7.5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 81.0%, Bt.2020: 59.0%
DCI P3: 99.3%, Bt.2020: 76.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

191 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

224 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

241 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

79 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

234 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1035 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1235 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1356 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1315 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

521 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED820

HDR luminance

Luminance of RGB colors

Samsung U8000F (IPS)

HDR luminance

Better doesn't mean good – and that's exactly how you can sum up the capabilities of the U8092F when it comes to displaying bright movie scenes in HDR mode. The brightness of the panel is just under 250 nits, which is definitely too low to enjoy any light effects. An interesting situation was observed during measurements of the fourth scene from the movie Sicario 2 – the television clearly dimmed the entire screen in an attempt to achieve better black levels (which still remain weak). One could even suggest that the device employs some form of "global dimming," but unfortunately – the effects are still very poor. To make matters worse, the television does not support a wide colour gamut – the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is around 80%, so don’t count on truly vibrant colours. The HDR image here looks more like slightly brightened SDR, and that’s the approach we would suggest you stick to when it comes to this television.

When it comes to HDR quality, the Philips OLED820 uses the same class of WOLED panel found in its biggest rivals – the LG C5 and the Samsung S90F. This means we can expect really solid results. This year, mid-range OLED panels can exceed the threshold of a thousand nits, and the tested model reaches around 1300 nits in some films. This is an outstanding result, allowing the director's vision to be conveyed with incredible precision, as this is the brightness range in which modern productions are mastered. Of course, there are situations where even the OLED820 has to compromise. Full-screen scenes flooded with white, like those in the film The Meg, can drop brightness to 400–500 nits, which clearly diminishes the effect. This is a characteristic of OLED technology that has not yet been fully eliminated. Despite this limitation, it's hard not to appreciate the HDR in this model – high luminance and a wide coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette at 99% make the image look simply fantastic.

Factory color reproduction

6.5/10

6.7/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

Samsung U8000F has been tested in the best possible built-in picture mode on the television, which is Filmmaker Mode. This mode should – at least in theory – provide a cinematic, reference image without unnecessary enhancements. For SDR content (mainly HD/SD), the television presented itself surprisingly well out of the box. White balance errors hovered around a value of 3, which is roughly on the edge of perceptibility. The only criticism could be directed at brightness management – the gamma chart showed a slight tendency to brighten or darken certain sections, but overall it performs quite well for this price segment.

Unfortunately, it looks much worse in HDR mode. Although the white balance was not terrible, the television had significant colour errors – particularly evident on the Color Checker chart, where almost every sample fell outside the target point. The image in HDR simply looks unnatural, and the colours can be shifted, muted, or too cool. This largely stems from the fact that U8000F does not support a wide colour gamut (DCI-P3). The television is physically unable to display correct colours in the HDR standard – and this is unfortunately felt in every more demanding material.

The colour reproduction in the factory settings really surprised us, and in a positive way. The Philips OLED820, switched to Filmmaker mode, immediately showed that it was quite well tuned in terms of colour. The white balance was relatively accurate, although there was a slight deficiency in the blue hue, which sometimes gave the image a slightly yellowish tint. However, this is not a drawback that particularly interferes with everyday viewing. A bigger problem arose with the brightness characteristics. The gamma chart clearly deviated from the ideal, as the line was below the expected values, causing the image to be excessively brightened, and the colours looked as if they were covered with a light milky filter. This effect was also noticeable in tests using the Colour Checker pattern, where more pronounced errors appeared.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.5/10

9.3/10

Even though the U8000F already offered a fairly good picture in SDR straight out of the box, we managed to tweak it a bit more. We were able to remove a slight purple tint and adjust the gamma to a more reasonable level. However, the television still tends to over-brighten the smallest and brightest parts of the image – the gamma chart shows a characteristic "dip" that is hard to fully straighten out.

Unfortunately, the situation looks worse in HDR. It's difficult to talk about any significant improvement here – the television simply isn't designed for HDR content. We tried to adjust the picture in the advanced settings, but despite our efforts, the colour errors remained quite noticeable – a delta E above 7 is already significantly visible deviations. It's a bit unfortunate, but that's the charm of a budget build. In SDR, the U8000F performs reasonably, whereas HDR is simply not its league.

After calibration, both the Filmmaker mode and the gaming mode improved quite a bit. A slight adjustment of the white balance and enhancement of the brightness characteristics yielded excellent results with SDR content – the image looked nearly perfect, natural, and very close to the reference. For HDR material, the situation was similar; the colours looked fantastic, and it was hard to find fault with anything. However, we did notice a certain characteristic, which we had already pointed out when comparing scenes from the film Billy Lynn. The analysis of the EOTF curve showed that the TV has a slight tendency to dim details in the blacks, meaning that the darkest parts are not always displayed exactly as the director intended. Nevertheless, the effect after calibration is superb, and the OLED820 is emerging as one of the more interesting screens in its class. A little bit of fine-tuning is all that’s needed, and there’s really nothing to worry about.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

6.5/10

Another important thing to pay attention to when assessing image quality is the smoothness of tonal transitions – that is, how the television handles blending colours and shades. And here the Samsung U8092F performs... almost perfectly. On the tested images, there are no noticeable banding transitions, no issues with colourful gradients, and the whole picture isn't artificially sharpened, which unfortunately happens with many televisions in this class. The image looks natural and very clear. We noticed minimal problems with the brightest scenes, but that's more of a nitpick that only a very trained eye would catch.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is unfortunately the Achilles' heel of the Philips OLED820. During testing, we noticed slight issues with colour blending – both in bright and darker scenes, there is a noticeable banding that detracts from the naturalness of the image. It must be said that compared to last year's model, the OLED 819, there is a significant improvement, but nonetheless, the competition performs better in this category.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

When it comes to how the Samsung U8000F handles lower quality materials, we must admit that Samsung has made progress compared to its predecessor from last year – the DU7192 model, which theoretically occupies the same place in the offering.

This year's model has been equipped with a function to improve the smoothness of tonal transitions, which has been implemented significantly better than last year. Yes, the TV still uses quite strong algorithms that can distort details or remove film grain, but even so – it can be confidently said that it operates effectively.

However, not everything has gone perfectly. The U8000F has noticeable issues with slight frame stuttering when watching very old content in very low resolution. If someone plans to play their old VHS tape, they must be aware that the picture may appear slightly "choppy".

Fortunately, the earlier effects of the mentioned posterisation can be quite effectively mitigated. The "distortion reduction" feature set to medium handles unwanted colour banding well, improving the smoothness of tonal transitions. It does sometimes work a bit too aggressively and smooths out some details – such as the minor imperfections of the actors’ skin – but despite that, it can be considered worth using without major compromises. The upscaling in the OLED820 also performs well. The test image with the model is exceptionally soft, sometimes perhaps too much, although this can be remedied with a slight increase in sharpness in the picture menu – that's a matter of individual preference. The absence of overscan issues with very low-resolution content is also commendable, allowing us to not worry about the image being unnecessarily cropped.

Blur and motion smoothness

6/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
48%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Smużenie ():

Smużenie (4K@144Hz):

Samsung U8000F is equipped with a 60 Hz panel, so right from the start, it's clear that we shouldn't expect miracles. This is simply the standard in this class – sufficient for everyday viewing, but without any fireworks.

The television offers one motion smoothing slider – a feature called “Motion Blur Reduction”, which allows us to adjust the smoothness of the image in movies. Higher settings provide a more “theatrical” and smoothed effect, while lower ones maintain the original character of the film with a slight 24p effect. An interesting feature is “Clear Motion LED”, or BFI mode – which inserts black frames between the image frames to enhance motion clarity. However, in practice, the screen flickers significantly when it's activated, and it's better viewed as an experiment rather than something that truly enhances gaming comfort.

Motion fluidity is an area where OLEDs always shine, and the Philips OLED820 confirms this rule. The panel itself offers a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which will mainly benefit PC gamers, but even with standard TV sources or consoles, where it operates at 120 Hz, motion is fast, sharp, and simultaneously smooth, without any signs of smearing. This is thanks to the remarkable response time between pixels, which ensures the image maintains clarity in every dynamic scene. The manufacturer has also added their own smoothness enhancer called "Motion Style." In the menu, we find two sliders – the first, responsible for smoothness, allows for the adjustment of the number of artificially added frames in films. This way, we can choose a raw, cinematic character with clearly visible film frames or a more theatrical image with smooth motion. The second slider is for motion blur reduction, particularly useful in sports broadcasts. Here, we definitely recommend setting it to the maximum value, as the effect is truly excellent.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

Samsung U8000F offers a basic set of features for gamers, which may still be sufficient for less demanding users. It has an automatic game mode – when a game is launched on the console, the TV automatically switches to low latency mode, which significantly improves response time. It also includes a VRR function, or variable refresh rate, which works within the range of 48 to 60 Hz. This means that both Xbox and PS5 won't produce the "tearing" effect – as long as we stay within this range.

And unfortunately, that's about it for the advantages. Additional features like Game Bar or higher refresh rates are reserved for higher models of Samsung’s 2025 line. In theory, the TV also supports the HGiG function, which should adjust the HDR image to the intentions of game developers. Unfortunately – although this function appears in brochures and store materials – its setup on the Xbox console turned out to be... impossible in practice.

The Philips OLED820 is one of the most comprehensive TVs for gamers. Onboard, we find practically everything one could expect: two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps (shame there aren't four), Variable Refresh Rate (VRR), Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM), support for Dolby Vision in games, and a good implementation of the HGiG mode. The TV also handles lower resolutions at 120 Hz without issue, so you can count on great flexibility when choosing different picture modes on your console. Philips also adds a Game Bar – a panel that allows you to change picture modes, add a crosshair, or preview parameters. Although it looks a bit clunky and is less refined than its competitors, it gets the job done. In practice, therefore, the OLED820, in addition to a full set of four HDMI 2.1 connections, offers almost everything a gamer could need.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
13 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
12 ms
13 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
13 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

The Samsung U8092F performed phenomenally well in our input lag tests. Regardless of resolution or mode – the results were very low, which is quite impressive for this price segment. Therefore, it’s safe to say that gaming on this TV will not cause frustration due to significant delays between what we do on the controller and what we see on the screen. For most gamers, even the more demanding ones, this result should be more than satisfactory.

The input lag on the Philips OLED820 is truly at a reference level. Measurements showed values below 5 ms, placing it among the very best TVs available on the market. Even the Dolby Vision mode does not cause it any issues in this regard, which is quite a rare phenomenon. In practice, this means an instantaneous response to every movement, no noticeable delays, and complete comfort in dynamic games. In short, excellent results that will please even the most demanding gamers.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

6.5/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Very Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
12ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RWBG
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

Working on the computer using this television is a real pleasure. The Samsung U8092F supports chroma 4:4:4, and thanks to the arrangement of the sub-pixels in the IPS panel, the readability of fonts – regardless of colour or size – is very, very good. The television is also suitable for occasional gaming on PC, mainly due to the low input lag. However, one must keep in mind that the G-Sync feature does not work on this model, which is strange because VRR worked without any issues when it came to the console.

Cooperation with a PC for the Philips OLED820 varies depending on the usage. It performs exceptionally well for gaming: the high refresh rate of 144 Hz combined with G-Sync support provides a smoothness and responsiveness that other TVs would envy. However, the situation is less favourable for text work. The lack of proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4 means that fonts on coloured backgrounds can appear slightly blurry, which significantly lowers the comfort of working. Therefore, it’s hard to recommend the OLED820 as a screen for office work with text or numbers. It's a pity that the manufacturer couldn’t learn from last year’s models, and this flaw continues to persist.

Viewing angles

7/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
34%
34%

The viewing angles on the Samsung U8092F are very good – as is typical for an IPS panel. The image doesn’t lose much in terms of brightness or colour saturation, even with a greater deviation from the axis. Of course, it’s not on the level of organic screens – but it’s entirely sufficient for comfortably watching the image at an angle, for example, from the side of the couch.

The viewing angles on the Philips OLED820 are another advantage that should please you. OLEDs have always been characterised by nearly perfect angles, so regardless of where we're looking from, the image remains clear and readable. True, the classic WOLED panel doesn't measure up to technologies like MLA OLED or QD-OLED, but it's still hard to find fault here. The angles are simply excellent.

TV efficiency during daytime

3.4/10

5.7/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips OLED820: 345 cd/m2

Samsung U8000F (IPS): 218 cd/m2

Thanks to the satin coating of the Samsung U8092F display, it handles reflections quite well. The screen doesn’t act like a mirror, and the colours – for a device of this class – remain fairly saturated, even in somewhat brighter conditions. Unfortunately, the coating alone can’t work miracles. The TV is just too dark to effectively shine through very challenging lighting conditions. If we place it opposite a light source (e.g. a large window or a strong lamp) – unfortunately, we need to accept that not everything will be clearly visible on it.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
White LED
Software version during testing
T-KSU2EFDEUC-0090-1064.4, E2500007, BT-S
TPM231WW_R.201.100.146.207
Image processor
MT5896 3GB

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

TV features

5.3/10

6.8/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    No
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

Samsung U8092F – like all this year's models from this brand – runs on the Tizen operating system. The system itself is really well developed: we have access to many applications (although not all), a well-developed smart home support, and various additions, including exclusive Samsung applications. Features such as AirPlay and Chromecast are also included, allowing us to easily connect our phone to the TV and stream multimedia.

Unfortunately, as this is Samsung's cheapest series in 2025, the manufacturer did not decide to include a solar remote. In the package, we find a classic infrared remote that visually resembles a newer version, but unfortunately lacks voice functions. When it comes to typical "TV" features – it misses recording functionality and the PiP (picture-in-picture) mode. On the positive side, though, the HDMI eARC works well, allowing for easy control of the included remote with devices like a decoder or soundbar – and it really works seamlessly.

GoogleTV on OLED820

Philips OLED820 runs on the Google TV system, which immediately places it among televisions that truly provide user freedom. It’s a fantastic platform that doesn’t need any introduction – we find almost an endless number of apps here, from popular VOD services to niche programmes or games. Google TV also allows for personalisation of the home screen, tailoring content to our preferences, so the television actually “learns” our viewing style. A huge plus is also the Google voice assistant – fast, natural, and effective. It can understand even less obvious questions, and in practice, it works significantly better than many competitors. Unfortunately, there was a hiccup – the screen mirroring function simply didn’t work during testing. This can be seen as a minor issue, but in 2025, such things simply shouldn’t happen.

Classic Features of OLED820

When it comes to classic features, the OLED820 doesn’t attempt to play conservatively. On one hand, we get a backlit remote control with a numeric keypad, which is quite well organised and comfortable to use. On the other hand, you have to aim it at the screen, as it works on infrared, which is more reminiscent of equipment from a decade ago than a modern television. It also lacks a few features that are often found in competitors – there’s no USB recording from tuners or a PiP mode. A nice touch among the classic solutions is the mini jack analogue input for headphones. This is rare nowadays and can be quite useful – whether for a senior citizen with an additional headphone station or for someone wanting to connect older speakers.

AmbilightTV OLED820

You can’t overlook Ambilight, which is a hallmark of Philips. This solution impacts not only the appearance of the television but also the reception of content. The lighting system can be set in various ways, from a multi-coloured mode dynamically tracking the image to calmer, static lighting. We definitely recommend the latter option, as the gentle light behind the screen makes the content viewed, in combination with the OLED matrix, appear even deeper and more engaging. It’s a simple yet very striking addition that has characterised Philips televisions for years.

Playing files from USB

9.3/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Samsung U8092F handles playback of files quite smoothly – the television supports most popular audio and video formats. Of course, it doesn’t support Dolby Vision, but you simply won’t find that in any Samsung model.

There are some reservations regarding the support for external text files – the ones that users would like to add as subtitles to a film. During our tests, the television only played TXT files, and other extensions like SRT or SUB unfortunately did not work. This may not be an issue for everyone, but it’s worth knowing. Perhaps this is a problem to be improved in the future with a software update for the television.

The Philips OLED820 has a built-in file player with USB, which at first glance looks quite clunky, but in practice works surprisingly well. You could even say it's one of the best built-in players available in televisions. It handles virtually every type of file: photos, videos, or music, with minor exceptions that most of the competition also does not support. And if someone still finds something missing, there's always the option to install the VLC app from the Google Play library and the problem disappears.

Apps

8.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

5.7/10

7.7/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

U8092F doesn't pretend to have a home theatre on board. We get the standard set of 2 x 10 W, which sounds fine but lacks excitement, albeit with a bit of bass. For everyday viewing, this audio setup is more than adequate. We were pleasantly surprised that it managed to play a movie with the built-in Dolby Atmos (JOC) codec – though of course, we're not talking about true surround sound here.

Philips OLED 820 features a built-in 4.1 speaker system with a total output of 70 W. At the back of the casing, there’s a subwoofer that delivers quite solid and deep bass. The classic speakers responsible for the remaining sound range are located at the bottom of the television, which means that the audio doesn't always distribute as we would like. However, the overall sound quality can be considered satisfactory – series, TV shows, or the occasional music listening all perform well with a slight bass enhancement. For everyday use, this should be sufficient, although we still recommend purchasing even an inexpensive soundbar, which will significantly improve the user experience.

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC