Samsung The Frame Pro vs Dreame S100

Direct comparison

The Frame Pro / LS03FW

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.3

6.8

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.8

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.6

    6.2

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    8.6

    7.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.4

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    7.0

    6.0

  • Utility functions

    7.7

    5.9

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    6.4

    8.3

Advantages

  • Premium design – symmetrical frame, the ability to fit interchangeable frames, the effect of a real picture on the wall

  • Wireless One Connect module – no visible cables by the television, easier space arrangement

  • Matte screen coating – no reflections even in bright rooms

  • Exceptionally high brightness – up to 900 nits

  • Wide colour palette – QLED

  • Smooth tonal transitions, practically no banding (colour stepping)

  • High motion fluidity – 144 Hz panel

  • Gaming features – VRR, ALLM, 144 Hz, Game Bar, low input lag (wired)

  • Tizen system – fast, intuitive, with a full suite of apps and support for AirPlay and voice assistant

  • Art Store – unique feature, television as a digital picture frame

  • Bracket included

  • Great viewing angles (thanks to the ADS panel)

  • Pretty good blacks thanks to Mini-LED backlighting

  • Good colours thanks to the PFS filter (advertised as QLED)

  • High motion fluidity (144 Hz panel)

  • Low input lag (in game mode)

  • A lot of gaming features, including two HDMI 2.1 ports (VRR, ALLM, and Game Bar)

  • Google TV system with a rich library of apps

  • Good sound thanks to the built-in “soundbar”

Disadvantages

No like
  • Hard to call it a true Mini-LED – edge lighting

  • Poor viewing angles (they could be better for a nicer wall image effect)

  • Lack of HGiG feature*

  • Flat sound, not much bass. Definitely need a soundbar

  • Issues with font readability and significant delays (input lag) when using the wireless One Connect module.

*The HGiG feature disappeared with the latest TV update. We are monitoring the situation and if anything changes regarding this matter, we will let you know.

  • Underdeveloped local dimming algorithms (can cause annoying brightness drops)

  • Outdated image processor and poor digital processing of the Google TV system

  • Software bugs, occasional stuttering

  • Useless Filmmaker mode (completely blocks any changes to picture settings)

  • Poor HDR format implementation in games (no HGiG support and high input lag in Dolby Vision mode)

Our verdict

Samsung The Frame Pro 2025 is a television that brings a breath of fresh air to the lifestyle model segment. Its design stands out - a symmetrical frame, the ease of swapping decorative frames, and above all, the image effect on the wall thanks to the matte finish and special mount. In everyday use, it makes a great impression, and the Art Store feature combined with high screen brightness means that this television works well not only as a display for movies and series but also as a part of interior decor. It's also hard not to appreciate the gadgetry addition of the wireless One Connect box – the ability to hide the port box anywhere in the living room offers considerable design flexibility. In terms of image quality, The Frame Pro holds up quite well. Brightness levels of up to 900 nits in peak scenes allow for enjoyable HDR effects even in brightly lit rooms, and the VA panel provides stable and solid contrast. On the other hand, there are quite a few question marks. Primarily - the naming. The "Pro" designation and the Mini-LED suffix suggest that we are dealing with an advanced local dimming system. Meanwhile, in the 65-inch variant, we counted only 24 zones, all located at the bottom edge of the screen. The effect after reading this review is probably already known to you. The blacks and contrast are decent, but far from what Mini-LED televisions with full, dense backlighting offer. The issue with the wireless module also raises mixed feelings. While it does work reasonably well for connecting an amplifier or decoder, gamers and PC users will quickly find that direct connection to the television via MICRO-HDMI is a necessity. Otherwise, they have to contend with high input lag and poorer readability of fonts. Therefore, it's hard to call The Frame Pro "Pro" in the strictly technological sense – it would be more appropriate to say it’s “Frame Plus.” A great lifestyle television, refined and visually striking, that will successfully find its place in a bright, modern living room, but at the same time, it doesn’t reach the level of quality we might expect from a product labelled as Mini-LED. This is a device that will impress with its design and additional features but will leave a slight sense of disappointment for those who anticipated a true breakthrough in image quality.

Dreame S100 is a successful, though still somewhat rough debut in the Mini-LED segment. Hardware-wise, the TV stands up for itself: Mini-LED technology with local dimming provides a deep and appealing black for the average viewer, and the IPS/ADS panel offers brilliant viewing angles. This is an interesting combination, as it is extremely rare in the LCD TV segment, which will certainly please those with wide living rooms or large corner sofas. If we add to this a full gaming package (HDMI 2.1, 144 Hz), the Google TV system with an almost endless number of apps, and very strong 4.1.2 audio with 70 W power, which performs well above the market average, we have an incredibly versatile screen.

Where's the catch? In the software. Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 suffers from typical “growing pains” – the outdated processor struggles with advanced digital processing, and the local dimming algorithms can be frustrating in more demanding scenes. Additionally, the Google TV system itself can occasionally experience slight stutters. So if you're looking for a well-equipped Mini-LED for a wide living room and are willing to overlook its minor system hiccups that the manufacturer can hopefully fix with future updates – this is a very interesting option. The hardware potential is huge, although the software still needs some final polishing.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Black
Black
Stand
Fixed, Height adjustment
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand, Wall bracket, One Connect Box
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.7/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 24 (1 x 24)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 160 (10 x 16)

Contrast:

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

5,100:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

4,650:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

4,350:1

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Contrast and black detail

Result

4,300:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

32,850:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

11,800:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,900:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,650:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

1,700:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Samsung The Frame Pro has officially been labelled as a Mini-LED backlit television, but… is it really? In our tested 65-inch variant, we counted only 24 dimming zones. The number itself seems modest, but more important is their distribution – all of them are along the lower edge of the screen. In practice, this means that The Frame Pro should be treated more as edge-lit than a full-fledged Mini-LED with dense, direct local dimming. Samsung has previously employed a similar manoeuvre, renaming the Q70 series to Neo QLED televisions – mainly for marketing purposes. How does this translate to picture quality? Black levels and contrast appear satisfactory, but there are no effects known from televisions with advanced local dimming as seen in the QN80 series. Much of this is due to the high-spec VA panel, which provides solid parameters on its own – a contrast ratio of around 5000:1 looks good and importantly, is stable, with minimal fluctuations. Nevertheless, if someone purchases The Frame Pro hoping to experience "true Mini-LED," they might be disappointed. We ourselves expected this model to significantly differentiate itself from the classic The Frame series in terms of contrast quality; however, the differences turned out to be smaller or even non-existent than the “Pro” designation might suggest.

The Dreame S100 is a Mini-LED television that features an IPS/ADS panel in its 65" version. This type of panel doesn't inherently offer the best contrast on the market, but thanks to a fairly dense Mini-LED backlight, the black levels in this model are actually quite impressive. In less demanding scenes, the contrast can reach values of 30,000:1. This is a result several times higher and practically impossible to achieve for any type of LCD panel without local dimming technology. This means that the black levels and contrast in the S100 will be quite appealing for the less demanding viewer.

Unfortunately, in more challenging scenes where a considerable number of small elements appear against a black background, the local dimming algorithms in the Dreame S100 don't perform perfectly. The TV can either dim excessively, making the blacks really deep but rendering almost nothing visible on the screen, or go the other way – showcasing a vast amount of detail, but resulting in very poor contrast. The blacks in very demanding scenes around bright objects then take on a greyish hue (halo effect). This is a typical limitation of Mini-LED televisions in the lower and mid-range segments, and unfortunately, the Dreame S100 is no exception, doing particularly poorly in this regard. However, it should be noted that overall, the contrast and black levels here are definitely better than those found in LCD televisions without any form of local dimming technology.

HDR effect quality

5.8/10

3.4/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 92.2%, Bt.2020: 71.2%
DCI P3: 94.6%, Bt.2020: 71.6%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Brightness measurement

Result

745 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Brightness measurement

Result

458 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Brightness measurement

Result

476 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Brightness measurement

Result

446 nit

Review Samsung The Frame Pro Brightness measurement

Result

660 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

503 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

71 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

241 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

42 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

589 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Dreame S100

Samsung The Frame Pro

Samsung The Frame Pro is one of the relatively bright televisions. In synthetic tests, we managed to achieve values around 900 nits, which is quite a decent result for a lifestyle model. In full-screen scenes, such as the frame from the movie The Meg or the opening sequence in Life of Pi, the brightness maintained a level of 700–800 nits. These values allow you to fully enjoy the HDR effects and capture their cinematic magic. However, the situation complicates when smaller, point light sources appear on the screen. The edge lighting used here, equipped with the ability to local dim whole strips, does not handle them very well. It happens that small elements are overly darkened, which weakens the effect, or conversely – they become heavily brightened, but at the cost of losing black depth in that part of the image. This can be compared to light halos reminiscent of a laser beam spreading in dense fog – an effect that is visible and bright but at the same time not very natural and distracting. Fortunately, the colour aspect performs better. Thanks to the use of a quantum dot filter (QLED), the colours are saturated, and the reproduction of the DCI-P3 palette reaches over 92%. Generally, movies or series watched in HDR on The Frame Pro present a rich colour palette, even if contrast and the performance of the lighting algorithms can sometimes draw our attention away.

The Dreame S100 is a relatively bright television. In movie mode, the brightness we measured reached around 600 nits. This is a really good result, although not the highest considering the competition in this price range. In full-screen scenes, it's clear that the television can generate an image that hits the mark in terms of brightness. Unfortunately, when more complex scenes appeared on the screen, the local dimming algorithm in this model tried above all to maintain the deepest blacks. However, this came at the expense of the HDR effect – and in a drastic way. In such scenes, the brightness of the bright elements fell below 100 nits, which is a downright tragic result, far from any HDR effect. This aspect can be improved, but there are caveats. You just need to change the local dimming setting in the television's menu; however, then the blacks in such scenes simply turn grey. It's a pity that Dreame wasn't able to refine the local dimming algorithms better, and the S100 is another example that the number of local dimming zones doesn't always translate into a better picture. As a consolation, it's worth noting that the Dreame S100 is marketed as a 'QLED' type television, although it actually uses a PFS LED filter. As a result, the colours are appropriately saturated, and our measured DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage exceeded 94%.

Factory color reproduction

5.5/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best results were, of course, achieved in Filmmaker mode, which immediately showed that Samsung had put effort into the factory settings. In SDR content – the most commonly viewed materials – The Frame Pro performed really well. The white balance and gamma were almost perfectly set, making the image look natural and cohesive. Yes, there were some noticeable errors, particularly in skin tones and reds, which could be overly saturated, giving everything a slightly "warmed up" character, but in everyday use, it didn't hinder the viewing experience too much. For HDR content, the situation was similar regarding the white balance. It was at a good level, however, the biggest issue turned out to be managing brightness. The EOTF curve was set in such a way that in many scenes the image appeared blown out, and the brightest areas lost detail and resulted in uniform patches of light. This severely affected realism and made colours appear very oversharpened. Fortunately, Samsung provides the option for manual adjustment of the curve in their TVs, so we opted for calibration and its results can be seen below.

We tested the Dreame S100 in "movie" mode and definitely recommend using this setting for watching all kinds of content. Interestingly, in the deeper settings of the TV, we also find a dedicated "Filmmaker" mode, which is now available from almost every manufacturer. However, in the case of the Dreame S100, we do not recommend using it – it blocks all settings related to the picture and does not allow for any configuration in the menu - not even a motion smoother. So how do the factory colours fare in the S100? Not too bad, but not great either. The TV itself had a noticeable blue tint, which is clearly evident in our white balance measurements. As a result, the picture was artificially brightened, and the colours had a slight bluish tint. This is also confirmed by the Color Checker palette, which showed how the colour samples leaned towards blue, generating quite significant colour errors. On the other hand, the picture looked definitely better in HDR mode, where the colour errors were not as prominent, although they were still far from ideal. Here, the white balance was also too heavily skewed towards blue, causing quite significant errors in color reproduction.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.5/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, the SDR mode looks almost perfect. We managed to eliminate the overly intense red saturation that previously gave the image a somewhat excessively warm character. The colours became more balanced, which translated into a natural and pleasant viewing experience for everyday content – from television to movies and series from streaming services or materials on YouTube. In HDR mode, the EOTF curve required the most work, as the factory settings caused excessive clipping of the entire image. The calibration significantly helped to "tame" this issue – the image stopped being overexposed, and details in the bright areas became more visible. Of course, the limits are set by the design of the television itself, as edge lighting reveals its limitations, and even the smallest elements of light can still appear overly bright or blend into the background. However, this is a matter of technology, not just calibration. After the correction, The Frame Pro is much more enjoyable to watch, and it is definitely worth considering if you want to make the most of the television's capabilities.

The Dreame S100 has proven to be a device very amenable to professional calibration. In its menu, we found a plethora of advanced options that allowed us to effectively correct factory errors. Thanks to the advanced white balance correction – both in SDR and HDR content – we completely eliminated excess blue components. The image instantly became much more natural and pleasant to view. After fully tuning the colours, the errors in the Color Checker test dropped below a Delta E value of 2-3. For the average viewer, this means that any colour distortions became almost impossible to see with the naked eye. It's really a nice surprise, as often new brands in the TV market have significant problems with the correct implementation and functioning of sliders in the calibration menu. Here, everything worked as it should. The only thing we need to criticise is the way the TV manages its brightness in HDR. Due to the specific nature of the local dimming algorithms, our measured EOTF curve shows anomalies. In places where high highlights should appear, there is a slight bump in the curve above the reference line. In practice, this results in unnatural brightening of certain, the brightest elements in movies or games. Despite this minor flaw, professional calibration brings a huge, very positive change to this model.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.5/10

8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Here Samsung has truly earned huge applause. The Frame Pro has proven to be one of the best TVs of the year in terms of smooth tonal transitions. During testing, we practically couldn't spot any clear issues with colour blending – the gradients looked smooth and natural, and the typical “banding” found in many TVs simply did not occur. Indeed, in very dark scenes, you can notice minimal imperfections, but you really have to squint to see them – even the keen eye of our editorial team struggled with this. So in everyday viewing, there's no chance of anything interrupting your experience. This is a huge plus, as it's in darker scenes where TVs typically struggle the most. You won't experience that here.

The transition between individual shades on the Dreame S100 is quite good. Analyzing most content in HDR10 format, we did not notice significant issues with banding. Only some very extreme and dark scenes revealed the problem of shade stepping. The situation is somewhat worse for content in Dolby Vision format*. Here, the colour gradation clearly deteriorates, and the tonal transitions from one colour to another are more visible and stand out from each other. Thus, the rating of this element on our site is slightly lower when we take into account viewing (on streaming platforms) in this format.

*we'll add the photos after modifying the site 😉

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

4/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Although in 4K HDR materials the fluidity of tonal transitions in the ChooseTV Pro is not a problem at all, naturally with weaker signal quality – such as with television, HD materials, or older Full HD films – imperfections may occur. Therefore, it's crucial how the television handles these limitations thanks to the image processor. The noise reduction feature works really effectively here. At the medium setting, it eliminates unwanted bands or artifacts, smoothing the image in a visible yet not overdone way. However, it's important to remember that Samsung has a tendency to be aggressive – even at the lowest level of this feature, it can "eat" film grain. So, it's wise to use it with caution and adjust the settings according to the material being watched.

The upscaling itself is of a high standard. The ChooseTV Pro effectively boosts older materials to a native 4K resolution, maintaining good sharpness and clarity. Movies and series in lower quality simply look better here. However, it's worth mentioning a minor downside – typical for many Samsung televisions. With very old sources in poor quality, you may notice some cropping of the image edges on the left side of the screen. It's not a problem that will ruin the viewing experience, but it's good to know that it may occur.

For scaling and digital processing in the Dreame S100, the technology used is proudly called Dreamind™ Pro AI by the manufacturer. However, it must be clearly stated that this is not a proprietary processor but rather a marketing term for a chip from MediaTek – specifically, the model MT5889. Unfortunately, we are talking about a rather outdated unit from a time when MediaTek lagged significantly behind the competition in terms of performance. This, unfortunately, has a direct impact on the image, as this chip also handles that. The upscaling in the S100 is fairly average, and the processor has a tendency to artificially over-sharpen edges (fortunately, this can be somewhat tempered with the sharpness slider in the menu). In the options, we also find a feature called "Contour Smoothing," which theoretically is supposed to improve tonal transitions. In practice, it contributes almost no improvement – setting it to any level rarely eliminates visible colour banding, but it can unnecessarily blur elements of the image that should remain sharp.

Another issue is the phenomenon of overscan (cropping the edges of the frame), which is practically visible all the time. Although there is the possibility to set the screen to display the full frame in low-resolution materials, it requires activating the aforementioned Filmmaker mode. And as you may know, this mode completely blocks any changes to other sliders in the picture menu. In our test tables, we noted that the television offers an option to disable overscan, as such a function technically exists in the system – however, in everyday use, while maintaining reasonable picture settings, you will not be able to take advantage of it.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.8/10

7.7/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
70%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

The fluidity of movement in The Frame Pro is not only due to the panel itself, which operates at a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz, but also the image processor and motion smoothing system. It is thanks to this that we can adjust the way movies or sports broadcasts are displayed to our own preferences. Available are sliders for blur reduction and motion judder reduction – the first function enhances the sharpness of fast movements, while the second helps to soften the effect of the "jumping" image during camera pans. Everyone can choose between a cinematic character of motion and a smoother, more "television" style.

When it comes to motion fluidity, the Dreame S100 performs really well. It features a 144 Hz refresh rate panel, although in reality, the vast majority of people using it in a conventional way will still be limited to 120 Hz (as this is what today's hardware allows aside from PCs). Thanks to the high refresh rate, the image in motion remains really sharp, largely due to the well-functioning MEMC motion smoother. In the menu, we find predefined modes that enable the TV to efficiently generate artificial frames, which effectively enhances the fluidity of dynamic sports shots, but also helps eliminate motion judder in film and TV series material recorded at 24 frames.

Console compatibility and gaming features

8.2/10

7.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Samsung The Frame Pro doesn’t pretend to be just a “living room” TV; gamers will also find something for themselves here. The manufacturer has ensured a full package of gaming features: we have support for variable refresh rate (VRR), auto low latency mode (ALLM), refresh rates up to 144 Hz, and compatibility with both G-Sync and FreeSync Premium Pro. Additionally, there’s the well-known Game Bar panel, which is a quick menu where you can check key parameters on-the-fly – from refresh rates to active image processing modes. Are there downsides? Yes, The Frame Pro doesn’t support Dolby Vision in game mode, but it’s hard to consider this a serious issue – most gamers use HDR10 anyway... so the HGIG mode. Exactly. The biggest surprise was the latest software update. Samsung... completely removed this option from The Frame PRO. In practice, this means that the TV independently interprets HDR tone mapping in games, and the user cannot enable settings designed with consoles in mind. This is a step backwards, which may disappoint more aware gamers hoping for full compliance with HGiG guidelines. We can only hope that this mistake will be quickly fixed.

An interesting feature of The Frame Pro is also the unusual placement of HDMI 2.1 ports. We have as many as five at our disposal – four are located in the One Connect module, and the fifth, in micro HDMI form, is located directly on the TV. This solution is quite unusual but very practical. Samsung clearly suggests that this is the port to connect your console or computer. Why? Because it minimises any potential delays associated with communication through the wireless One Connect, and in gaming, every millisecond counts. We have written separately about input lag, but we can reveal here that by connecting the equipment directly to the TV, we get the absolute maximum response speed from it.

The Dreame S100 seems almost like the ideal screen for gamers. The television is equipped with 2 HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 40 Gbps, allowing features such as automatic game mode (ALLM) or VRR frame synchronization in the range of 48-144 Hz to work seamlessly on consoles. On board, we also find a well-designed gaming panel (Game Bar). It allows you to continuously preview the most important parameters - from the activated picture modes, to the number of frames rendered by the console, right through to the option of adding a crosshair in the centre of the screen. All of this looks great on paper; however, the biggest issue with the S100 is its implementation of HDR in games. The television does not have a correctly implemented HGiG format. This means a clueless user may misconfigure the console during the initial setup of the screen. Poor configuration can result in an image that is too dark or overexposed (as a guideline: we suggest setting the brightness in the Xbox console menu to around 600 nits, and in the PS5 to 12 clicks). The Dolby Vision format also proves problematic, as it often did not activate at all on the XBOX – Dreame S100 line. And when it was eventually activated, playing was impossible due to the very high input lag often exceeding 100ms. If the manufacturer manages to improve the HDR gaming experience with an update, the S100 will be truly outstanding hardware for gamers. For now, however, compromises must be accepted.

Input lag

9.9/10

9.2/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
15 ms
1080p120
9 ms
6 ms
2160p60
14 ms
15 ms
2160p120
8 ms
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
15 ms
2160p120
9 ms
6 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
127 ms
2160p120 DV
18 ms

The Frame Pro in wired mode records really great results. Latencies remain in the range of 9–14 ms, which ensures smooth and immediate response in games. These values can easily be considered reference standards – even in dynamic titles, the action proceeds without delays, and the controls are precise and predictable. The situation changes when the wireless One Connect module comes into play. While it allows you to hide cables and enjoy greater freedom in room arrangement, it significantly worsens input lag results. In tests conducted at a distance of 2–3 meters from the television, without any furniture obstacles, values jumped to 50 ms. While this is acceptable for watching movies since input lag doesn't concern us at all, it becomes problematic in games and severely ruins the experience. It's a bit of a paradox – on one hand, we have a television that offers some of the best results on the market in wired mode, while on the other hand, Samsung promotes a solution that turns out to be quite detrimental for gamers. After all, the console is one of the key devices we usually connect to the television...

For clarity, we are including our wireless measurements from a distance of 2-3m:

SDR

HDR

1080p60 Hz: 39

2160p60 Hz HDR: 40

1080p120 Hz: 25

2160p120 Hz HDR: 25

2160p60 Hz: 40

2160p120 Hz: 25

Aside from the previously mentioned issue with Dolby Vision, the input lag on the Dreame S100 is really very low. Values of around 5-6 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12-15 ms for 60 Hz are such excellent results that even a professional gamer won't be able to feel any delay during gameplay. The response to movements on the controller is almost instantaneous here.

Compatibility with PC

8.4/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Very Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
8ms
6ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Connecting The Frame Pro to a computer via cable is essentially no big deal – it works as it should. The image is clear, the fonts look good, you can easily manage daily tasks in Word or Excel, and then fire up a game and it's still fine. The fun really begins when we use the wireless module. And this is where the whole paradox of this TV comes to light – the solution that was meant to make life easier can actually complicate it quite a bit in practice. It's not just about the aforementioned delays, which can be felt immediately when using the mouse, but also about the readability of the image itself. Fonts begin to look worse, at times you can see faint lines, and letters lose sharpness, making working with text simply tiring. It's really strange that such a simple thing as displaying letters on the screen can fall apart due to the wireless module. So if someone is planning to use The Frame Pro with a computer – whether for work or gaming – it's definitely worth connecting it via cable straight away. Otherwise, you can quickly get irritated and instead of enjoying the large screen, you'll feel like your eyes are fighting the TV for every paragraph of text.

The Dreame S100 works well as a large gaming monitor. It has a 144 Hz refresh rate and easily supports G-Sync and FreeSync. However, problems arise when you want to use it for text work. Due to a software bug, the TV struggles with full colour sampling (Chroma 4:4:4) at 120 Hz and 144 Hz refresh rates, resulting in blurry fonts. To make the text perfectly sharp, you need to manually lower the refresh rate to 60 Hz in Windows. This is quite an annoying solution that forces constant jumping between settings if you want to use this screen for both work and gaming.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

6.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
73%
68%

The Frame Pro features a VA panel, which immediately indicates that viewing angles are not its strong suit. Just sitting a bit off to the side shows how the screen starts to lose quality – brightness drops, colours fade, and blacks, which look solid from a central perspective, suddenly resemble more of a dark grey velvet than deep tar. This is most noticeable at around a 40–45 degree angle – there, the image clearly brightens, and colour saturation significantly decreases. Overall, this is nothing new, as most LCD TVs with VA panels behave this way. At the cost of better blacks compared to IPS panels, we get worse viewing angles.

The viewing angles on the Dreame S100 are really good, thanks to the ADS panel. Unlike VA panels, this type of screen allows you to watch the image from a wide angle without noticeable loss of colour saturation and brightness. This comes at the expense of worse native contrast, but for most viewers (especially those with a wide couch) this will be quite a good compromise. There is a lack of Mini-LED TVs with good viewing angles at a reasonable price on the market today, so the S100 nicely fills this niche.

Daytime performance

7/10

6/10

Panel finish
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Dreame S100: 463 cd/m2

Samsung The Frame Pro: 614 cd/m2

The Frame series has stood out for several years due to its matte screen coating, and The Frame Pro from 2025 is no exception. Thanks to this, you can rest assured that light reflections won’t irritate you even in a brightly lit lounge. Samsung has refined this technology to near perfection over the years, and today it can confidently be said that this is the best matte screen available in televisions. The colours still look good and don’t drastically lose saturation, as is the case with cheaper Chinese models. The black levels also remain decent, although it must be acknowledged that in extremely bright lighting conditions, the colours may slightly flatten and lose depth. However, this is a small price to pay for the total lack of reflections on the screen – which can be invaluable in everyday use. Brightness is also a plus – around 600 nits in SDR mode means that the picture breaks through daylight easily and will look satisfactory in most rooms.

The Dreame S100 works well in most living rooms during the day. The television is equipped with a satin screen coating – while it may not perfectly eliminate reflections, it does a great job of preserving colour saturation, which doesn’t fade when the room is bright. In terms of pure brightness, the S100 has a moderately bright screen. It can reach about 600 nits peak in SDR format. This level allows it to be placed in typically sunlit rooms, although – let’s be honest – it’s not a brightness demon, and it may struggle a bit with direct, harsh sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-RSMFDEUC-0090-1126.0, E2500007, BT-S
RTMA.250416.179
Image processor
mt5889 3GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung The Frame Pro TV Panel details
Review Dreame S100 TV Panel details
Review Samsung The Frame Pro TV Panel details
Review Dreame S100 TV Panel details

Samsung The Frame Pro

Dreame S100

TV features

7.7/10

5.9/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Good
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung The Frame Pro TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro TV features
Review Samsung The Frame Pro TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    No
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Smart Features

Samsung The Frame Pro operates on the Tizen system, which has been the hallmark of the Korean manufacturer for years. It is one of the most refined smart TV environments – fast, stable, and intuitive. Almost none of the popular streaming apps are missing here, and the interface runs smoothly and without significant delays. It also supports features like AirPlay 2, screen mirroring, and the ability to control the TV using voice commands via Bixby, Alexa, or Google Assistant.

TV Features

When it comes to classic TV functions – like in almost every Samsung – this is not the strongest side of the device. We receive a clear EPG guide, teletext support, the ability to connect headphones via Bluetooth, and that's pretty much it. You won’t find more advanced tools known from other TVs (e.g., USB recording or PiP). However, this is standard in Samsung's offering. The manufacturer has been setting trends for several years and mainly focuses on smart features, while classic television is somewhat neglected.

Art Store and Interchangeable Frames – a Unique Element of the Series

What distinguishes The Frame series from the very beginning is the Art Mode and the Art Store application. Thanks to this, we can display reproductions of artworks on the screen from classics to modern graphics. Although the service is paid (in the form of a subscription or a one-off annual fee), it ensures that the materials are prepared in the highest quality, making the displayed images look almost like they were painted. It is this element, along with the ability to change the TV frames, that allows The Frame Pro to serve a dual purpose as both a television and a design element in the interior.

Wireless One Connect Module

The second unique element of The Frame PRO is the wireless One Connect module, where we find all the HDMI ports and other connections. Thanks to this, the TV itself can hang on the wall almost like a real painting, while all the electronics and cables can go into a separate box placed even a few meters away. The device is powered via USB-C and takes over all the “thinking” processes of the TV. While this solution has its limitations for gamers or PC users (latency, degradation of font quality), it works great for connecting an amplifier, decoder, or individual multimedia devices. It's a very “gadgety” solution, but in everyday use, it turns out to be simply convenient and allows for better space arrangement in the living room.

Smart TV: Google TV

Dreame S100 uses the Google TV operating system. This is great news for anyone looking for a television with access to almost all streaming apps on the market. The system itself runs quite smoothly, although it does experience slight stutters now and then – which is par for the course in most Chinese TVs with Google software. On board, we find almost every necessary Smart TV feature, including screen mirroring and voice search using Google Assistant. Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 lacks support for AirPlay, making it difficult for iPhone users to easily share content from their phones.

Television Features

Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 is not a television designed for traditional TV viewers. Aside from basic options like connecting headphones and a rather simple remote control equipped with a numeric keypad, there are practically no additional features to facilitate the daily viewing of traditional channels. The only pleasant and increasingly rare addition is the presence of a physical minijack headphone output. This allows for connecting older wired headphones or analogue audio sets.

Apps

9.3/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The Frame Pro handles playback of media from USB memory correctly. Most popular video, music, and photo formats work without major issues, and the television handles them efficiently. During testing, we noticed only one inconvenience – files in HEIC format, which is a standard used by Apple, do not open even though the system sees them and displays them in the player. For those who often transfer photos from their iPhone, this may be a slight annoyance, but apart from that, the player fulfills its role well and it's hard to have major complaints about it.

The built-in media player works well and handled most files we provided from our USB drive without any issues. However, there were times when the app experienced slight stutters, and selected movies or photos only loaded after a few seconds. If the factory player turns out to be not very intuitive or lacks advanced features, the Google TV system saves the day. You just need to go to the app store and install any external media playback program (e.g. VLC) that will resolve this issue.

Sound

6.4/10

8.3/10

  • Maximum volume
    84dB
    84dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The sound on the ChooseTV Pro isn't one of the strong points of this television. The slim design means that there's practically no bass, which makes the overall sound a bit flat and average. On the other hand, the television plays loudly – it can easily fill a medium or even larger lounge. Dialogues are clear, but with special effects or music, it lacks depth. This is definitely equipment that it's worth adding a soundbar to, preferably from the Samsung S designer series. Thanks to the decorative frames, you can match it to the decor along with the ChooseTV Pro.

The sound quality of the Dreame S100 is one of the biggest advantages of this model – it's really good. The TV is equipped with a 4.1.2 speaker system with a total power of 70 W. The sound is clear, with a noticeably defined bass, which is confirmed by our acoustic measurements. The large drivers positioned on the sides of the casing effectively widen the soundstage. As a result, we get a noticeably more spacious sound compared to standard 20-watt 2.0 systems. The device supports Dolby Atmos encoding, so we can easily play spatial audio tracks from streaming platforms without the need to purchase an external soundbar. Unfortunately, it lacks support for the DTS format – that's a downside, although it must be honestly admitted that this standard is increasingly being abandoned by most manufacturers. On the plus side, the audio connection options are good. The Dreame S100 can be easily connected to newer home theatres or soundbars via the HDMI eARC port or optical output. A nice and increasingly rare addition is the classic minijack headphone socket, which allows older audio sets to gain a new life.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

84dBC (Max)

75dBC