Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) vs Dreame S100

Direct comparison

The Frame / LS03FAU

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.0

6.8

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.8

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.5

    6.2

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.4

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    8.8

    7.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.2

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    6.3

    6.0

  • Utility functions

    7.2

    5.9

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    8.3

Advantages

  • Matte panel effectively reduces reflections

  • Screen customisation option with interchangeable frames + art mode

  • Free add-ons including wall mount + OneConnect module

  • High native contrast

  • Good brightness

  • High refresh rate - 120/144Hz

  • Plenty of features for gamers - VRR, ALLM, Gamebar, proprietary motion smoother functioning in games

  • Great viewing angles (thanks to the ADS panel)

  • Pretty good blacks thanks to Mini-LED backlighting

  • Good colours thanks to the PFS filter (advertised as QLED)

  • High motion fluidity (144 Hz panel)

  • Low input lag (in game mode)

  • A lot of gaming features, including two HDMI 2.1 ports (VRR, ALLM, and Game Bar)

  • Google TV system with a rich library of apps

  • Good sound thanks to the built-in “soundbar”

Disadvantages

No like
  • No DTS support – requires additional hardware for some films on Bluray discs

  • Paid image mode

  • Underdeveloped local dimming algorithms (can cause annoying brightness drops)

  • Outdated image processor and poor digital processing of the Google TV system

  • Software bugs, occasional stuttering

  • Useless Filmmaker mode (completely blocks any changes to picture settings)

  • Poor HDR format implementation in games (no HGiG support and high input lag in Dolby Vision mode)

Our verdict

Samsung The Frame 2025 is a TV like no other – and even though competition has emerged, it still does it best. The matte display, flush with the wall, and a single thin cable thanks to the One Connect module make the device resemble a painting more than any other screen. The Art Store app still offers the best art scans on the market (even if they are subscription-based), and with interchangeable frames, we can match the TV to the interior almost like furniture. As for the picture itself, because after all, we are talking about an ordinary TV, there are no significant changes, but also no disappointments compared to last year's LS03D model. The Frame still offers high native contrast and solid brightness at 600 nits, which combined with the matte coating provides very comfortable use during the day. The colours aren't as vibrant as those on glossy screens, but against competitive matte designs – they perform the best. A new feature is the 144 Hz refresh rate, although in practice, it will mainly benefit PC gamers. And indeed – in terms of features for gamers, The Frame has almost everything: low input lag, variable refresh rate (VRR) support, automatic game mode (ALLM), Game Bar, and a one-of-a-kind motion smoother designed for games. Unfortunately, not everything is as perfect as it might seem. Why? Well, because the HGiG mode, which suddenly disappeared from the latest version of the Tizen system, is missing. And Samsung really should respond here, as it is a key element for many gamers when choosing a screen. And we fully understand that. Even though LS03F The Frame 2025 doesn't bring major revolutions, it remains a unique TV that, besides its appearance, offers a quite solid picture and expanded gaming features. It's just a pity that year after year we also get new compromises.

[UPDATE] We have updated our tests of Samsung TVs from the 2025 model year due to the release of software version 1131, which restored the crucial HGiG feature for gamers.

Dreame S100 is a successful, though still somewhat rough debut in the Mini-LED segment. Hardware-wise, the TV stands up for itself: Mini-LED technology with local dimming provides a deep and appealing black for the average viewer, and the IPS/ADS panel offers brilliant viewing angles. This is an interesting combination, as it is extremely rare in the LCD TV segment, which will certainly please those with wide living rooms or large corner sofas. If we add to this a full gaming package (HDMI 2.1, 144 Hz), the Google TV system with an almost endless number of apps, and very strong 4.1.2 audio with 70 W power, which performs well above the market average, we have an incredibly versatile screen.

Where's the catch? In the software. Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 suffers from typical “growing pains” – the outdated processor struggles with advanced digital processing, and the local dimming algorithms can be frustrating in more demanding scenes. Additionally, the Google TV system itself can occasionally experience slight stutters. So if you're looking for a well-equipped Mini-LED for a wide living room and are willing to overlook its minor system hiccups that the manufacturer can hopefully fix with future updates – this is a very interesting option. The hardware potential is huge, although the software still needs some final polishing.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 1 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Changeable Frame
Black
Stand
Height adjustment
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand, Wall bracket, One Connect Box
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 160 (10 x 16)

Contrast:

Review Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,800:1

Review Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,750:1

Review Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) Contrast and black detail

Result

14,900:1

Review Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Review Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,300:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

32,850:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

11,800:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,900:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,650:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

1,700:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The year 2025 is shaping up to be quite interesting when it comes to lifestyle televisions. Why? Because Samsung has prepared two versions of the iconic model The Frame – one standard and the other with the addition of "Pro". In this review, we take a look at the version without "Pro", which – as we will soon see – makes a significant difference. The standard model LS03F lacks any local dimming technology, unlike its more expensive sibling. This is important as it affects not only the overall picture quality but primarily how this television handles black levels.

The VA panel used in The Frame 2025 has a high native contrast – and this obviously works in its favour. In the tested movie scenes, details in the dark areas of the image were well visible, nothing blended together, and there was no uniform black/light blob. For the average viewer, this will be perfectly sufficient. But of course, not everything is ideal. The lack of local dimming means that the black levels on this television are not perfectly deep – they resemble a dark navy blue rather than pitch black. Additionally, in our tested unit, we noticed slight blooming on the right side of the screen, but this may simply be the "character" of the unit rather than a rule. Theoretically, one could try to improve the perception of black by backlighting the screen – for example, with an LED strip – but in the case of The Frame, that’s rather impossible, as this television is meant to sit flush against the wall like a piece of art. So to achieve better blacks visible to our eyes, we are forced to watch LS03F with the lights on. Such is the charm of this technology.

The Dreame S100 is a Mini-LED television that features an IPS/ADS panel in its 65" version. This type of panel doesn't inherently offer the best contrast on the market, but thanks to a fairly dense Mini-LED backlight, the black levels in this model are actually quite impressive. In less demanding scenes, the contrast can reach values of 30,000:1. This is a result several times higher and practically impossible to achieve for any type of LCD panel without local dimming technology. This means that the black levels and contrast in the S100 will be quite appealing for the less demanding viewer.

Unfortunately, in more challenging scenes where a considerable number of small elements appear against a black background, the local dimming algorithms in the Dreame S100 don't perform perfectly. The TV can either dim excessively, making the blacks really deep but rendering almost nothing visible on the screen, or go the other way – showcasing a vast amount of detail, but resulting in very poor contrast. The blacks in very demanding scenes around bright objects then take on a greyish hue (halo effect). This is a typical limitation of Mini-LED televisions in the lower and mid-range segments, and unfortunately, the Dreame S100 is no exception, doing particularly poorly in this regard. However, it should be noted that overall, the contrast and black levels here are definitely better than those found in LCD televisions without any form of local dimming technology.

HDR effect quality

6/10

3.4/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.5%, Bt.2020: 72.2%
DCI P3: 94.6%, Bt.2020: 71.6%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) Brightness measurement

Result

642 nit

Review Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) Brightness measurement

Result

589 nit

Review Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) Brightness measurement

Result

574 nit

Review Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) Brightness measurement

Result

584 nit

Review Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) Brightness measurement

Result

631 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

503 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

71 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

241 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

42 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

589 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Dreame S100

Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F)

The Frame LS03F is a television that can surprise with its brightness. The maximum luminance reaches around 650 nits, which already looks solid on paper. But as we know – lab tests are one thing, and real film scenes are quite another story. When watching HDR materials in natural conditions, The Frame 2025 maintains very good results. In most film scenes, peak brightness stayed at around 550–650 nits. This is enough to feel the difference between standard picture and that in HDR quality – bright highlights, reflections on water, or moonlight look distinct and impressive.

It's also worth noting that the LS03F is a QLED television, which translates to solid colour saturation. The coverage of the DCI-P3 colour space reaches about 92%, allowing for vibrant, intense colours in HDR content. It's not at the level of top premium models, but for a lifestyle screen – the result truly deserves recognition.

The Dreame S100 is a relatively bright television. In movie mode, the brightness we measured reached around 600 nits. This is a really good result, although not the highest considering the competition in this price range. In full-screen scenes, it's clear that the television can generate an image that hits the mark in terms of brightness. Unfortunately, when more complex scenes appeared on the screen, the local dimming algorithm in this model tried above all to maintain the deepest blacks. However, this came at the expense of the HDR effect – and in a drastic way. In such scenes, the brightness of the bright elements fell below 100 nits, which is a downright tragic result, far from any HDR effect. This aspect can be improved, but there are caveats. You just need to change the local dimming setting in the television's menu; however, then the blacks in such scenes simply turn grey. It's a pity that Dreame wasn't able to refine the local dimming algorithms better, and the S100 is another example that the number of local dimming zones doesn't always translate into a better picture. As a consolation, it's worth noting that the Dreame S100 is marketed as a 'QLED' type television, although it actually uses a PFS LED filter. As a result, the colours are appropriately saturated, and our measured DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage exceeded 94%.

Factory color reproduction

7.1/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

When it comes to picture quality right out of the box, even in Filmmaker mode, which is supposed to be the closest to reference, there were some issues. In both HD and 4K HDR content, we noticed clear deviations in white balance. The picture was heavily skewed towards red and blue, giving the screen a distinctive pinkish hue. This effect was most noticeable in bright scenes – for example, in shots with a lot of white, where neutral light should naturally dominate. In such moments, the screen clearly took on pink tones, which is also evident in the attached comparative photo. As for brightness characteristics – it wasn't as bad as one might expect given such colour inaccuracies. Analysis of the gamma curve and EOTF showed a slight brightening of the image compared to the reference, but not enough to drastically spoil the viewing experience.

We tested the Dreame S100 in "movie" mode and definitely recommend using this setting for watching all kinds of content. Interestingly, in the deeper settings of the TV, we also find a dedicated "Filmmaker" mode, which is now available from almost every manufacturer. However, in the case of the Dreame S100, we do not recommend using it – it blocks all settings related to the picture and does not allow for any configuration in the menu - not even a motion smoother. So how do the factory colours fare in the S100? Not too bad, but not great either. The TV itself had a noticeable blue tint, which is clearly evident in our white balance measurements. As a result, the picture was artificially brightened, and the colours had a slight bluish tint. This is also confirmed by the Color Checker palette, which showed how the colour samples leaned towards blue, generating quite significant colour errors. On the other hand, the picture looked definitely better in HDR mode, where the colour errors were not as prominent, although they were still far from ideal. Here, the white balance was also too heavily skewed towards blue, causing quite significant errors in color reproduction.

Color reproduction after calibration

8/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, the movie mode gained a completely new quality. The issue of the pink tint, which was previously clearly visible, especially in bright scenes, has been effectively eliminated. Colours started to look significantly more natural, and the white balance no longer dominated the rest of the image. It was no longer the same oversaturated "picture from a box" – everything took on coherence and a cinematic character. Additionally, the tendency of the TV to slightly brighten scenes, previously visible in the EOTF curve analysis, has been partially corrected. Of course, within the limits of what the design allows without local dimming – it's difficult to speak of perfect brightness management here. Nevertheless, the final effect was definitely closer to what one might expect from a mode named Filmmaker.

The Dreame S100 has proven to be a device very amenable to professional calibration. In its menu, we found a plethora of advanced options that allowed us to effectively correct factory errors. Thanks to the advanced white balance correction – both in SDR and HDR content – we completely eliminated excess blue components. The image instantly became much more natural and pleasant to view. After fully tuning the colours, the errors in the Color Checker test dropped below a Delta E value of 2-3. For the average viewer, this means that any colour distortions became almost impossible to see with the naked eye. It's really a nice surprise, as often new brands in the TV market have significant problems with the correct implementation and functioning of sliders in the calibration menu. Here, everything worked as it should. The only thing we need to criticise is the way the TV manages its brightness in HDR. Due to the specific nature of the local dimming algorithms, our measured EOTF curve shows anomalies. In places where high highlights should appear, there is a slight bump in the curve above the reference line. In practice, this results in unnatural brightening of certain, the brightest elements in movies or games. Despite this minor flaw, professional calibration brings a huge, very positive change to this model.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

In terms of the smoothness of tonal transitions, the LS03F maintains a high standard – just like last year's models. The television didn’t have any issues during testing of more challenging film scenes, where visible transitions between shades can easily occur. The colour gradation performs very well here – both in lighter and darker parts of the image. We did not observe the typical banding effect or any other disturbances that could be noticeable while watching films. If we were to nitpick, in the most demanding scenes – with subtle transitions and delicate gradients – minor imperfections can be seen. But only if you get really close to the screen and start analysing the image from an unintended distance.

The transition between individual shades on the Dreame S100 is quite good. Analyzing most content in HDR10 format, we did not notice significant issues with banding. Only some very extreme and dark scenes revealed the problem of shade stepping. The situation is somewhat worse for content in Dolby Vision format*. Here, the colour gradation clearly deteriorates, and the tonal transitions from one colour to another are more visible and stand out from each other. Thus, the rating of this element on our site is slightly lower when we take into account viewing (on streaming platforms) in this format.

*we'll add the photos after modifying the site 😉

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.7/10

4/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

LS03F is equipped with an NQ4 processor, which is responsible for improving image quality – especially in lower-quality materials. In practice, it works surprisingly well, particularly when it comes to older content and recordings with lower resolution. Activating the "noise reduction" feature delivers noticeable results. The television effectively smooths tonal transitions and removes digital noise that can appear in darker areas of the image. Compared to previous generations, there is a clear improvement – earlier, this feature often smoothed everything too much, including details that it shouldn't have removed. In this year’s model, the smoothing still occurs, but it happens in a much more acceptable way. Textures of materials, skin, or fabric details are not as heavily muted as before – the image retains more naturalness. However, this does not change the fact that film grain is still removed by the television, which may not appeal to everyone. On the other hand, it's no longer such an aggressive intervention as in previous models. It's also worth mentioning that the LS03F may struggle with very weak signals – for example, from VHS tapes or low-resolution video. In such cases, we noticed slight clipping of the image at the edges – the so-called overscan. This can lead to situations where a small part of the image (e.g., subtitles at the bottom edge) gets cut off.

For scaling and digital processing in the Dreame S100, the technology used is proudly called Dreamind™ Pro AI by the manufacturer. However, it must be clearly stated that this is not a proprietary processor but rather a marketing term for a chip from MediaTek – specifically, the model MT5889. Unfortunately, we are talking about a rather outdated unit from a time when MediaTek lagged significantly behind the competition in terms of performance. This, unfortunately, has a direct impact on the image, as this chip also handles that. The upscaling in the S100 is fairly average, and the processor has a tendency to artificially over-sharpen edges (fortunately, this can be somewhat tempered with the sharpness slider in the menu). In the options, we also find a feature called "Contour Smoothing," which theoretically is supposed to improve tonal transitions. In practice, it contributes almost no improvement – setting it to any level rarely eliminates visible colour banding, but it can unnecessarily blur elements of the image that should remain sharp.

Another issue is the phenomenon of overscan (cropping the edges of the frame), which is practically visible all the time. Although there is the possibility to set the screen to display the full frame in low-resolution materials, it requires activating the aforementioned Filmmaker mode. And as you may know, this mode completely blocks any changes to other sliders in the picture menu. In our test tables, we noted that the television offers an option to disable overscan, as such a function technically exists in the system – however, in everyday use, while maintaining reasonable picture settings, you will not be able to take advantage of it.

Blur and motion smoothness

6.9/10

7.7/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
43%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

The new feature in The Frame for 2025 is a 144 Hz refresh rate display. Yes – in a television primarily associated with displaying works of art, you can now not only watch Van Gogh, but also comfortably play on a console or follow fast-paced sporting events. This is a significant step towards greater versatility. In the case of Samsung movies, as usual in models with a 120 Hz display and above, it allows you to adjust motion fluidity according to your preferences. You can set a more cinematic reproduction that maintains frame rate or opt for complete image smoothing. The range of options is broad, allowing you to tailor the effect to your tastes – regardless of whether the screening is meant to look like classic cinema or a performance on a modern theatre panel.

*this part of the test refers to the model LS03FAU in sizes 55 and 65 inches, which is equipped with a 144Hz display; the sizes 43 and 50 inches have 60Hz displays, and consequently perform much worse in terms of motion fluidity.

When it comes to motion fluidity, the Dreame S100 performs really well. It features a 144 Hz refresh rate panel, although in reality, the vast majority of people using it in a conventional way will still be limited to 120 Hz (as this is what today's hardware allows aside from PCs). Thanks to the high refresh rate, the image in motion remains really sharp, largely due to the well-functioning MEMC motion smoother. In the menu, we find predefined modes that enable the TV to efficiently generate artificial frames, which effectively enhances the fluidity of dynamic sports shots, but also helps eliminate motion judder in film and TV series material recorded at 24 frames.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

7.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

As we mentioned earlier – while The Frame is likely to display images and works of art most of the time, Samsung realised that a Van Gogh enthusiast could equally well be an avid gamer. And it must be said that The Frame 2025 has almost everything it needs to become a full-fledged gaming TV.

Onboard, we find support for ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode) and Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) thanks to the implementation of one HDMI 2.1 port. The television handles lower resolutions at higher refresh rates with ease and has an extensive Game Bar – already known from other Samsung models – which allows for quick viewing and changing of the most important gaming-related settings. And for that, it scores extra points with us. The proprietary motion smoothing technology, Auto Motion Plus Game, also deserves special mention, which – it’s worth emphasising – works without increasing input lag. Samsung remains the only manufacturer that has managed to implement this feature in a virtually unnoticed way in terms of delays. The result? Much better smoothness in games, especially those that struggle to maintain stable 60 frames. This solution can significantly improve gameplay comfort in more demanding titles – particularly on consoles that don’t always maintain full fluidity, especially in AAA games.

As for the downsides – the lack of Dolby Vision is already regarded as standard in Samsung televisions, so there’s not much to critique here. However, the problem is something completely different. In the latest version of the Tizen system, the HGiG option has disappeared. Literally – it’s gone. This is a significant hindrance when configuring consoles for the correct HDR content display in games. It's hard to understand why such a decision was made, but one thing is certain – this should be fixed as soon as possible. We are talking about a brand that has set standards for years when it comes to gaming on TVs. If HGiG returns – and we hope it will – The Frame LS03F can confidently aspire to the title of a true gaming television. Not just as a wall decoration but as equipment that truly provides joy in gaming.

[UPDATE] We have updated our tests of Samsung televisions from the 2025 model year due to the release of software version 1131, which restored the key gaming feature, HGiG.

The Dreame S100 seems almost like the ideal screen for gamers. The television is equipped with 2 HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 40 Gbps, allowing features such as automatic game mode (ALLM) or VRR frame synchronization in the range of 48-144 Hz to work seamlessly on consoles. On board, we also find a well-designed gaming panel (Game Bar). It allows you to continuously preview the most important parameters - from the activated picture modes, to the number of frames rendered by the console, right through to the option of adding a crosshair in the centre of the screen. All of this looks great on paper; however, the biggest issue with the S100 is its implementation of HDR in games. The television does not have a correctly implemented HGiG format. This means a clueless user may misconfigure the console during the initial setup of the screen. Poor configuration can result in an image that is too dark or overexposed (as a guideline: we suggest setting the brightness in the Xbox console menu to around 600 nits, and in the PS5 to 12 clicks). The Dolby Vision format also proves problematic, as it often did not activate at all on the XBOX – Dreame S100 line. And when it was eventually activated, playing was impossible due to the very high input lag often exceeding 100ms. If the manufacturer manages to improve the HDR gaming experience with an update, the S100 will be truly outstanding hardware for gamers. For now, however, compromises must be accepted.

Input lag

10/10

9.2/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
15 ms
1080p120
8 ms
6 ms
2160p60
13 ms
15 ms
2160p120
8 ms
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
15 ms
2160p120
8 ms
6 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
127 ms
2160p120 DV
18 ms

When it comes to input lag, Samsung maintains a very high standard. The LS03F, like most of this year's models from the brand, achieves a score of 8 ms for 4K content, which is practically a benchmark value. This result allows you to play even the most dynamic titles without delays and with complete responsiveness. Well done!

Aside from the previously mentioned issue with Dolby Vision, the input lag on the Dreame S100 is really very low. Values of around 5-6 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12-15 ms for 60 Hz are such excellent results that even a professional gamer won't be able to feel any delay during gameplay. The response to movements on the controller is almost instantaneous here.

Compatibility with PC

8.2/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
8ms
6ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Collaboration of The Frame 2025 with a computer poses no major issues. Let's start with gaming, as this is where this model shows its strengths – support for 144 Hz signal, low input lag, and compatibility with G-Sync technology (for NVIDIA cards) make it hard not to consider it a full-fledged gaming monitor. It’s one of the more interesting "gaming with PC" televisions available on the market in this class.

When it comes to everyday work, the situation looks just as good. The Frame easily handles chroma 4:4:4, which translates to good font readability and overall user comfort. We only noticed slight issues with dimming very thin lines and dark details on a light background – this effect may occur, particularly when working with small interface elements. In practice, however, with a 55-inch screen and standard office working distances, it will be hard to realistically notice this problem. Nonetheless, it's worth keeping this in mind if the television is to serve as a monitor not only for entertainment but also for precise graphic or text work.

The Dreame S100 works well as a large gaming monitor. It has a 144 Hz refresh rate and easily supports G-Sync and FreeSync. However, problems arise when you want to use it for text work. Due to a software bug, the TV struggles with full colour sampling (Chroma 4:4:4) at 120 Hz and 144 Hz refresh rates, resulting in blurry fonts. To make the text perfectly sharp, you need to manually lower the refresh rate to 60 Hz in Windows. This is quite an annoying solution that forces constant jumping between settings if you want to use this screen for both work and gaming.

Viewing angles

3.5/10

6.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
70%
68%

As one could expect from a VA panel, the viewing angles on The Frame 2025 are at best mediocre. The image loses saturation and contrast when viewed off-axis. It's a shame, because we're talking about a model that displays digital artworks in standby mode – and it's precisely in such moments that wide viewing angles would make the most sense, enhancing the feeling of interacting with a real piece of art rather than just its screen imitation.

Perhaps in the future, manufacturers will decide to introduce special coatings or modified versions of VA panels that improve this aspect – as it would have real significance not only in terms of functionality but also aesthetics for lifestyle televisions.

The viewing angles on the Dreame S100 are really good, thanks to the ADS panel. Unlike VA panels, this type of screen allows you to watch the image from a wide angle without noticeable loss of colour saturation and brightness. This comes at the expense of worse native contrast, but for most viewers (especially those with a wide couch) this will be quite a good compromise. There is a lack of Mini-LED TVs with good viewing angles at a reasonable price on the market today, so the S100 nicely fills this niche.

Daytime performance

6.3/10

6/10

Panel finish
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Poor
Good

Panel brightness

Dreame S100: 463 cd/m2

Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F): 596 cd/m2

One of the most distinctive features of The Frame is its matte display – and it must be said that Samsung has really perfected this aspect. From our experience, it's one of the best solutions for reducing reflections, especially direct ones. If reflections on the screen can be irritating, it will be hard to find a better screen in this budget than the matte panel used in Samsung TVs. Of course, this comes with a certain compromise. In very bright sunlight, colours may appear slightly faded, and the image loses a bit of depth. However, this is something we consciously accept when opting for a matte screen – you win some, you lose some. In practice, the colours and contrast on Samsung's matte screen still outperform those on Chinese models such as TCL NXT Vision or Hisense Canvas TV. If effective reduction of reflections is a priority and you want to use the TV also as a “digital artwork” in bright rooms, it’s hard to make a better choice.

The Frame achieves around 600 nits of brightness, which, combined with the matte coating, ensures that the TV performs well in well-lit daytime conditions. It may not be at the level of flagship models, but in everyday use – in a living room with plenty of light – it handles it without any problems.

The Dreame S100 works well in most living rooms during the day. The television is equipped with a satin screen coating – while it may not perfectly eliminate reflections, it does a great job of preserving colour saturation, which doesn’t fade when the room is bright. In terms of pure brightness, the S100 has a moderately bright screen. It can reach about 600 nits peak in SDR format. This level allows it to be placed in typically sunlit rooms, although – let’s be honest – it’s not a brightness demon, and it may struggle a bit with direct, harsh sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
QLED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-PTMFDEUC-0090-1110.7, E2500007, BT-S
RTMA.250416.179
Image processor
mt5889 3GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) TV Panel details
Review Dreame S100 TV Panel details

Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F)

Dreame S100

TV features

7.2/10

5.9/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Good
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 1 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) TV features
Review Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) TV features
Review Samsung The Frame 2025 (LS03F) TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    No
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Classic TV Features

In terms of classic features, The Frame doesn’t stand out in any significant way compared to its competitors. There’s no option for USB recording or PiP (picture in picture), which may be disappointing for some users. On the other hand, the TV allows simultaneous use of speakers and headphones, which can be useful – especially for older users. The EPG, or electronic programme guide, is quite readable, and despite the absence of traditional buttons on the remote, we managed to launch even the teletext. In everyday use, the basic functions work smoothly and without major complaints.

Smart System – Tizen and Apps

The Frame 2025 runs on the Tizen system, which has been regarded as one of the most refined Smart TV solutions on the market for years. It’s a system designed for devices that are more than just a television – and it has been designed with this spirit in mind. Tizen offers full integration with external devices – supporting both Apple AirPlay and Miracast. Thanks to the SmartThings app, it’s possible to control not only the television but also other devices within the smart home framework. Since last year, Samsung has also been developing its own voice assistant with support for the Polish language, which significantly facilitates operation. However, the greatest strength of the Smart system in The Frame remains the Art Gallery app. Although access to it is paid (via subscription), it offers the best art scans on the market – we’re talking about scans, not just ordinary photos. This makes the effect of a digital painting hanging on the wall appear significantly better than in any other lifestyle TV.

Smart TV: Google TV

Dreame S100 uses the Google TV operating system. This is great news for anyone looking for a television with access to almost all streaming apps on the market. The system itself runs quite smoothly, although it does experience slight stutters now and then – which is par for the course in most Chinese TVs with Google software. On board, we find almost every necessary Smart TV feature, including screen mirroring and voice search using Google Assistant. Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 lacks support for AirPlay, making it difficult for iPhone users to easily share content from their phones.

Television Features

Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 is not a television designed for traditional TV viewers. Aside from basic options like connecting headphones and a rather simple remote control equipped with a numeric keypad, there are practically no additional features to facilitate the daily viewing of traditional channels. The only pleasant and increasingly rare addition is the presence of a physical minijack headphone output. This allows for connecting older wired headphones or analogue audio sets.

Apps

8.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

During testing, we didn't notice any major issues with playing files from a USB memory stick. The television handled both video materials and photos well. Of course, there are some exceptions – for example, the lack of support for the HEIC format (used by Apple devices) – but it's hard to consider this surprising. On the positive side, it fully supports high-resolution photos – the television displays high megapixel files without any problems, which can be significant for those wanting to treat The Frame as a digital photo frame as well. However, during testing, we noticed a limitation regarding subtitles – the television only correctly handled files in .txt format. It's worth keeping this in mind and ensuring that downloaded subtitles for films are saved in this format; otherwise, they may simply not display.

The built-in media player works well and handled most files we provided from our USB drive without any issues. However, there were times when the app experienced slight stutters, and selected movies or photos only loaded after a few seconds. If the factory player turns out to be not very intuitive or lacks advanced features, the Google TV system saves the day. You just need to go to the app store and install any external media playback program (e.g. VLC) that will resolve this issue.

Sound

6/10

8.3/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    84dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

For such a slim television, the sound is quite decent. It’s full, adequate for everyday viewing, but lacks much excitement – typical of flat designs. There's not much bass, although at times it can be heard. The speakers in a 2.0.2 configuration have a total power of 40 W. (in the 55+ inch version) Unfortunately, the television does not support DTS format, so for movies with that sound, you'll need to rely on external equipment, like a home theatre system. You can connect a soundbar, and thanks to the Q-Symphony feature, the television plays along with it. Samsung also offers visually matching models for The Frame like S700D or S800D, but they are sold separately. (This shouldn’t really surprise anyone😉).

The sound quality of the Dreame S100 is one of the biggest advantages of this model – it's really good. The TV is equipped with a 4.1.2 speaker system with a total power of 70 W. The sound is clear, with a noticeably defined bass, which is confirmed by our acoustic measurements. The large drivers positioned on the sides of the casing effectively widen the soundstage. As a result, we get a noticeably more spacious sound compared to standard 20-watt 2.0 systems. The device supports Dolby Atmos encoding, so we can easily play spatial audio tracks from streaming platforms without the need to purchase an external soundbar. Unfortunately, it lacks support for the DTS format – that's a downside, although it must be honestly admitted that this standard is increasingly being abandoned by most manufacturers. On the plus side, the audio connection options are good. The Dreame S100 can be easily connected to newer home theatres or soundbars via the HDMI eARC port or optical output. A nice and increasingly rare addition is the classic minijack headphone socket, which allows older audio sets to gain a new life.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

84dBC (Max)

75dBC