Samsung S90H (WOLED) vs Samsung S85H

Direct comparison

S90H / S92H / HAE / HAT

Info

S85H

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”83”

Available screen sizes: 48”55”65”77”83”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.4

7.9

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    8.6

    8.0

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.8

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.5

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    9.7

    9.6

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    6.5

    5.1

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    7.3

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    8.4

    7.2

Advantages

  • Perfect blacks and infinite contrast (OLED)

  • Very high HDR brightness (up to 1400 nits)

  • Effective anti-reflective coating (Matte, Glare Free)

  • Excellent colour accuracy after calibration

  • Great motion handling (no motion blur)

  • Excellent for gamers (4× HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, low input lag)

  • Game Motion Plus feature

  • Refresh rate up to 165 Hz

  • Wide viewing angles

  • Fast, fully featured Tizen

  • Good sound

  • Perfect blacks and infinite contrast, OLED

  • Decent HDR brightness of up to around 800 nits

  • High image fidelity after calibration

  • Very good motion handling, 120 Hz OLED panel

  • Rich set of gaming features: VRR, Game Bar, low input lag

  • 4 HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48 Gbps bandwidth

  • Feature-rich, smoothly running Tizen system

  • Solar-powered remote with many features

  • Support for Dolby Atmos spatial audio

Disadvantages

No like

- In bright light colours lose some depth (a characteristic of matte coatings) - Lack of TV features such as USB recording or picture-in-picture (PiP) - No support for DTS:X (an issue for Blu-ray disc fans) - Reduced colour saturation compared with the QD-OLED variant

  • Poorer anti-reflective performance than its predecessor, a characteristic of the new OLED SE panel

  • Average SDR brightness, best suited to a room with controlled lighting

  • No DTS:X support, mainly a downside for owners of Blu-ray collections

  • No Dolby Vision, not essential but would be welcome 🙂

Our verdict

Samsung S90H is a TV that simply makes a brilliant impression. The combination of OLED’s absolute black, high brightness and excellent motion clarity produces a picture that’s hard to look away from. And that’s exactly what you expect from a good OLED TV. The matte anti-reflective coating also works very well. Reflections on a sunny day become less of an issue, and thanks to the standard polariser blacks don’t shift as much toward greyish-maroon tones as they do on QD-OLED. Add a snappy Tizen, an excellent set of gaming features led by Game Motion Plus, and surprisingly good, full-bodied sound from the built-in speakers. Any weaknesses? Of course. Tone transitions aren’t quite as perfect as on QD-OLED, and viewing angles remain slightly worse. In practice these are minor points, especially since WOLED also has its own advantages, particularly in a bright room where it preserves black levels and colour saturation better. Overall, QD-OLED still comes out a bit ahead, but this time the difference isn’t as pronounced as it was a year ago. For most people this won’t be a deciding factor when choosing a TV. So our advice is this: instead of obsessing over panel type, pick the size that best fits your room. Whether you buy the WOLED or QD-OLED version, you’ll get a mature, versatile and very well-balanced TV. As every year, the S90H series holds a top spot among the best-value OLEDs of 2026.

Samsung S85H is a very successful continuation of the S85 series and a TV that still performs its main role well: to be an affordable entry into the world of OLEDs. The biggest change from its predecessor is the use of LG Display's new OLED SE panel, but the overall character of this model remains practically unchanged. Its greatest strengths are still perfect blacks, very high contrast and a picture that can look truly excellent in the evening. Add to that good colors and the ability to achieve a high degree of fidelity to the director's vision. The S85H also works very well as a versatile TV. Gamers get four HDMI 2.1 ports, 120 Hz, VRR, very low input lag and Game Motion Plus, so there is little to complain about here. Tizen runs fast and is user-friendly, and the whole system clearly targets users who today mainly use Netflix, YouTube and other streaming services, while traditional broadcast TV is treated as an extra.

However, the new OLED SE panel is not without flaws. This is most noticeable when watching during the day, because its glare handling is worse than previous OLED panels. Its peak brightness is also not high enough for the S85H to perform particularly well in a very sunlit living room. It is still a TV that shows its strengths best in the evening or in a room with at least partial control over ambient light. And that is probably the best way to look at the S85H. It is not an OLED meant to break brightness records or compete with the most expensive panels. It simply aims to offer what people like most about the technology, but at a lower price. Perfect blacks, very good movie picture quality, excellent gaming features and a convenient smart system make the S85H one of the easiest ways to get into OLED without spending a fortune.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Base adjustment
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

10/10

Contrast:

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85H Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

As the Samsung S90H uses an organic display, it deserves the highest possible rating for contrast and blacks. This applies to both variants on the market: the WOLED model we tested and the QD-OLED version. Because each pixel is an independent light source and can switch completely off, the TV delivers absolutely perfect black and infinite contrast. In practice that translates into brilliant image depth and perfectly sharp separation of bright details from a dark background. Any haloing (blooming), which still affects even top Mini LED-backlit LCD TVs, is completely absent here. The true magic of the WOLED panel is most evident during evening viewing in a darkened room; the dark areas of the picture gain remarkable texture, impressive three-dimensionality and a wealth of details hidden in the shadows.

The switch to LG Display's new WOLED SE panel has essentially changed nothing in terms of black levels and contrast. And it was hard to expect any major improvement here, because it’s still OLED, a technology that can completely switch off each individual pixel. In practice that means perfect black and huge image depth, especially in darker scenes. Black bars are truly black, there’s no haloing around bright elements, and contrast remains practically infinite. Even very expensive Mini-LEDs with thousands of local dimming zones still can’t offer the same precision as the S85H. And that’s exactly its biggest advantage. The S85H may be Samsung’s cheapest OLED, but when it comes to black levels it can show exactly the same as much pricier models using organic panels.

HDR effect quality

7.7/10

6.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 99.4%, Bt.2020: 75.9%
DCI P3: 95.2%, Bt.2020: 70.9%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1374 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1419 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1570 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1395 nit

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

713 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

733 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

744 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

837 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

755 nit

Review Samsung S85H Brightness measurement

Result

404 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung S85H

Samsung S90H (WOLED)

Luminance of RGB colors

Luminance of RGB colors

The Samsung S90H in the WOLED variant is still an exceptionally bright TV for its price bracket, although it is slightly dimmer compared with the QD-OLED version. That difference is not as pronounced as in last year’s F series, where gaps sometimes reached 500 nits. Here the parameters of both panels are very similar, with differences in peak brightness of only about 100–150 nits. In small-window measurements the S90H with the WOLED panel easily reaches close to 1,500 nits. That headroom lets it phenomenally convey the dynamics of HDR effects — blooms, light reflections and explosions have the right punch, exactly as intended by the studio creators. As with most OLED displays, when a very bright scene fills the entire screen, panel protection systems kick in and brightness naturally falls to around 700 nits. It’s worth stressing that this is still an excellent result on the market, often noticeably better than many Mini LED screens in the same segment.

Colour gamut coverage

The biggest difference between the two S90H variants lies in colour reproduction and saturation. This stems directly from the different construction of the WOLED panel, which uses an additional white subpixel. As a result, very high-brightness colours don’t achieve quite the same saturation, and the wide-colour volume is slightly more limited than with QD-OLED. That said, in everyday use these differences will be hard for most viewers to notice. Our measured DCI-P3 coverage on the WOLED panel reaches almost 99%, meaning that for the vast majority of real film scenes both variants will present an almost identical image. The real gap only appears in rarer, especially demanding productions that use the ultra-wide BT.2020 gamut. Because of the WOLED panel’s construction, coverage of that standard is roughly 15% lower compared with the S90HAT with a QD-OLED panel, so the brightest, heavily lit HDR colours may appear a touch less vivid.

Interestingly, the new WOLED SE panel has brought a slight improvement in brightness to the S85 lineup. In the same film scenes last year’s model sat closer to about 700 nits, while the S85H can reach roughly 800 nits. That’s not a change that completely transforms the HDR experience, but the extra headroom is noticeable, especially with point highlights, reflections or stronger special effects. Around 800 nits is a very good result for an entry-level OLED and in most films it’s enough for HDR to have the necessary punch. Bright elements can clearly stand out against perfect blacks, and that contrast is still doing most of the work here. However, you need to remember the typical limitation of OLED technology. When a very bright scene covers a large portion of the screen, brightness can drop to almost half. This is the result of panel protections that limit its output with large bright areas.

Colours

The S85H can deliver very pleasant, saturated colours and in most HDR films it looks really good in that regard. We measured around 95% coverage of DCI-P3, so the palette most commonly used in films is reproduced to a very high degree. Skin tones, greens and stronger reds still have appropriate intensity and under normal viewing it’s hard to have major complaints. Only when you look more broadly at BT.2020 do the limitations of the new WOLED SE panel become apparent. Coverage was about 70%, a bit less than WOLEDs of the previous generation and noticeably less than QD-OLED panels. In films this isn’t a big loss, since most productions rarely use such heavily saturated colours. You’re more likely to notice it in games, where developers more often opt for more intense colours.

Factory color reproduction

7.6/10

7/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

In Filmmaker mode, which we strongly recommend switching on straight out of the box, the S90H offers very good factory colour tuning. Colours are natural and faithful to the creators' intent, without the annoying oversaturation seen in more aggressive profiles. However, as is often the case without full calibration, there is unit-to-unit variation. In our test the white balance was a little deficient in the blue component, so the image leaned slightly towards warmer, yellowish tones. This was most noticeable in bright scenes, such as the snowy sequences from Star Wars. Additionally, the gamma curve was slightly low at around 2.2, which caused a small lift in shadow detail. In HDR mode the tuning was a bit better, showing only a slight undersaturation in the red region.

To evaluate colours we of course used Filmmaker mode, and in SDR our S85H unit was set very well from the factory. The largest deviation appears in the white balance, where as brightness increases it starts to lose a bit of blue. In practice this means whites and greys have a slightly warmer tint than they should. However, it's not a big fault and during normal viewing it generally isn't very noticeable. Gamma also stays close to the reference value, so the picture is neither overly bright nor unnecessarily dim. The S85H's SDR picture therefore looks really good straight out of the box. A few more imperfections appear in HDR. Here the white balance shifts more with rising brightness, with blue starting to dominate and the red component clearly lacking. This also results in larger errors in some colours. These aren't yet colour errors that completely change the character of the picture, but in direct comparison with the reference the difference is easier to spot. Overall, Filmmaker mode is a very good starting point before professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.2/10

9.1/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After full calibration, you can safely say the S90H in the WOLED version looks almost perfect. In SDR mode colour errors fall to ultra-low levels and Delta E values very rarely exceed 2. That's a phenomenal result, so if perfectly faithful colour reproduction matters to you, it's definitely worth getting it calibrated. The calibrated HDR mode also performs very well, where the white balance was stabilised and previous deviations eliminated. After professional tuning it's really hard to fault anything, because the TV delivers an image with almost exemplary naturalness and three-dimensionality. The slightly lower score in this category compared with the QD-OLED variant is solely due to the saturation limitation in extremely bright scenes, while the tuning potential and colour fidelity are at the highest level.

Calibration delivers really good results on the S85H. First and foremost, we were able to set the white balance almost perfectly, which removes the slightly too-warm picture tone previously seen in SDR. Colour reproduction also improves significantly, with most errors falling to very low levels, and in everyday viewing it's hard to find any visible inaccuracies. You can also improve HDR quite a bit, although some issues remain that stem from the TV's inherent characteristics. The S85H doesn't always hold the luminance curve perfectly. The darkest parts are slightly boosted, while, as you approach the panel's limits, you can see small deviations in the brightest highlights. Add to that the limited coverage of the wider BT.2020 colour gamut, which of course cannot be overcome by any calibration. Despite that, the end result is very good, and after calibration the S85H can deliver a really well-tuned, natural image.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8/10

7/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The smoothness of tonal transitions is at a very solid level here, and the WOLED panel variant has been noticeably improved compared with last year’s F-series model. Troublesome gradient artefacts and visible banding occur much less often. Despite this clear improvement, it still does not reach the level of QD-OLED technology. In almost every direct comparison the QD-OLED panel handles smooth transitions between shades a little more precisely. In summary, when it comes to gradients the WOLED panel is clearly better than earlier generations of these panels, but the QD-OLED variant still holds a noticeable advantage in this area.

The smoothness of tonal transitions is definitely not a strong suit for the S85H compared with other OLEDs. This is most noticeable in bright gradients, where fairly obvious banding appears between successive shades. Instead of a perfectly smooth transition you can see distinct colour bands, and you don't have to look hard to find them. Gradients in motion fare even worse. When tonal transitions move the imperfections become more visible and the image looks simply average in that respect. Dark gradients aren't perfect either. You can also notice irregularities here, so the problem isn't limited to the brightest areas of the picture. Of course, in a normal film you won't see this all the time, but scenes with large areas of similar colour, like sky, fog, sunsets or dark backgrounds, can expose the panel's limitations. Compared with older WOLEDs there's still some improvement, but looking at the TVs we tested this year the S85H is average in this respect, as is its competitor the LG B6 that uses the same panel. And it's one of those characteristics where the difference compared with last year's QD-OLED panel becomes very clear. QD-OLEDs handle the smooth blending of successive shades much better and, in terms of gradation, clearly beat the WOLED SE panel used here.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

When it comes to banding reduction itself, Samsung has kept the same solutions known from last year’s models. The dedicated gradient-smoothing function works quite well and can effectively mask unwanted tonal transitions, which can be useful on a WOLED panel that’s somewhat more prone to banding. However, it’s important to remember it acts aggressively. This mechanism, aside from the artefacts themselves, can remove fine film grain and subtly soften detail. Ultimately it’s a trade-off, but if you want perfectly faithful image reproduction, it’s safer to leave this option off.

There’s also no breakthrough in scaling. The S90H uses the same NQ4 Gen3 processor as its predecessor, so upscaling quality was almost identical. The chip sharpens lower-resolution material very well, pulling a satisfying level of detail out of it. However, Samsung still hasn’t solved the old overscan problem. For some older recordings or archival footage the edges of the image can be slightly cropped. It’s a minor drawback, but it’s a shame the manufacturer still hasn’t fixed it.

Samsung's S85H uses the same proprietary AI processor, AI NQ4 Gen2, as last year’s S85F, and in terms of digital image processing it performs quite well. Upscaling is one of the model's stronger points. Lower-resolution material is well sharpened, edges look natural and the picture doesn't come across as overly artificial. Just remember a common quirk of Samsung TVs: at very low resolutions you can't completely turn off overscan, so the TV may slightly crop the left edge of the picture. The "noise reduction" function, that is smoothing weaker tonal transitions, also works very well. The processor can effectively remove posterisation and other artefacts visible in lower-quality material. However, be careful with the strength of this function, because Samsung can be fairly aggressive here. When it's activated, along with unwanted artefacts, fine details such as skin or clothing texture also start to disappear.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
165Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
50%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@165Hz ):

Blur (4K@60Hz):

When it comes to motion handling the S90H is simply excellent. This year's panel offers its refresh rate boosted to 165 Hz, although in practice the benefit will mainly be for gamers connecting a powerful PC. For movies, TV series or sports broadcasts such a high refresh rate makes no difference and the picture looks exactly the same as at the standard 120 Hz. Regardless of the source, the OLED panel's lightning-fast response time does the job. Motion is clean, and the ghosting or smearing seen on LCDs simply doesn't occur here.

The S85H uses an OLED panel, so it performs brilliantly when it comes to motion blur. Pixels respond almost instantly, so moving objects don't produce the characteristic ghosting seen on some LCD TVs. This is especially noticeable with sport or fast-paced games, where the picture stays very clean even during rapid motion. The panel itself runs at 120 Hz. That's more than enough for movies, TV shows, sport or console gaming. It's a shame Samsung didn't include a higher refresh rate aimed at PC gamers, as more and more TVs now offer 144 or even 165 Hz at 4K. However, that doesn't affect motion handling in films or sport.

There's also the classic motion smoothing feature with two settings: blur reduction and judder reduction. So you can choose whether films should keep their cinematic 24 frames per second, or whether you'd prefer to smooth them a bit. The S85H gives plenty of freedom here, and the interpolation itself works well and, with sensible settings, doesn't generate too many artefacts.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

9.6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 165Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Gamers should feel right at home with the S90H, because Samsung has left few reasons to complain in this area. The TV has four HDMI 2.1 ports, each supporting VRR, ALLM and high refresh rates. There's also the Game Bar, a handy menu that lets you quickly check key parameters and change settings without leaving the game. Importantly, Samsung has also improved HGiG. In last year's models it could cause issues when used with a console, but on the S90H it now works as it should. What really stands out against the competition is Game Motion Plus. It's a specialised motion-smoothing mode for games that works best with titles running at 30 or 60 frames per second. Motion becomes noticeably smoother and latency remains at a reasonable level. In our measurements it was under 50 ms, so gaming is still comfortable. That's important, because on many TVs enabling a similar smoothing feature causes such a big increase in input lag that controls become noticeably sluggish. Samsung has managed to find a good compromise here. There's still no Dolby Vision Gaming, but in practice Game Motion Plus may prove to be the more useful feature.

Samsung S85H is very well prepared for gaming, essentially regardless of whether you connect a console or a computer. The manufacturer didn’t skimp on connectors and all four HDMI ports support full HDMI 2.1. That means you can use 4K at 120 Hz, VRR and ALLM without worrying which input to plug your console into. With multiple devices that matters a lot, since you don’t have to choose between a console, a PC or a soundbar connected via eARC. The feature set itself is very complete. The S85H supports VRR, FreeSync and automatic switching to Game Mode, and Samsung also offers its expanded Game Bar, which lets you quickly view the key signal parameters and change settings without leaving the game. The only real omission is Dolby Vision, which will matter mainly for Xbox owners. That’s a typical trait of Samsung TVs. Game Motion Plus performs very well and it’s one of the features that has set Samsung TVs apart for years. It smooths motion in games running at 30 or 60 fps, but does so without as large an increase in input lag as a classic motion interpolator. In practice, for slower-paced games, racing or action titles it can genuinely improve motion perception, especially if you’re sensitive to low frame rates.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
10 ms
10 ms
1080p120
6 ms
5 ms
2160p60
10 ms
10 ms
2160p120
6 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
10 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Input lag is another aspect that's hard to fault. At 120 Hz we measured just about 5 to 6 ms, which is truly outstanding. Switching to even higher refresh rates, the delay fell to astronomically low levels, practically imperceptible during gameplay. The Samsung S90H delivers top-tier results.

Samsung S85H also performs very well in terms of input lag. At 120 Hz we measured input lag below 5 ms, which is at a level where the TV's response to controls is practically instantaneous. At 60 Hz the delay is of course higher, but still remains very low, about 10 ms, so in that respect the S85H gives little cause for complaint.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
6ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RWGB
RGWB
Max refresh rate
165Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

The S90H works very well as a large-format monitor for PC, and not just because of its comprehensive gaming features. NVIDIA G-Sync certification, low input lag and support for refresh rates up to 165 Hz mean it runs smoothly with typical gaming PCs. In terms of motion and image sharpness in PC games it’s hard to find fault. The situation is a little different for everyday office work, web browsing or text editing. Although fonts remain legible, the specific subpixel structure of the WOLED panel (with an additional white subpixel) can be noticeable. When sitting very close to the screen, letter edges and small interface elements can show slight coloured fringing or appear a bit softened. This is characteristic of WOLED panels. In practice, however, it’s not a major issue. We tested the 65-inch variant, which is naturally used from about a metre or more. From that distance the effect practically disappears and doesn’t interfere with daily work. It may be more noticeable in the smallest sizes, like 42 or 48 inches, which often sit on a desk and are used from a distance of a few dozen centimetres.

The Samsung S85H also performs very well as a large PC monitor. Text readability is good and, from the typical viewing distance for such a large screen, text looks really good. You just need to remember the four-subpixel layout of the WOLED panel, which means that up close the edges of letters aren't quite as perfectly sharp as on a traditional RGB monitor. However, that's a characteristic of OLED technology itself and, during normal TV use, it shouldn't be an issue.

The S85H also has plenty to offer PC gamers. You get 120 Hz, G-Sync support, very low input lag and, of course, the lightning-fast response time of the OLED panel. The only thing missing for a truly complete experience is the ability to run the panel at a higher refresh rate. More and more TVs already support 144 or 165 Hz at 4K, so an additional mode like that would be welcome here.

Viewing angles

7.6/10

7.5/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
31%
34%

Viewing angles on the Samsung S90H are very good and among the best on the market. That's thanks to the OLED panel, which when viewed from the side does not lose brightness or colour saturation as quickly as many LCD TVs. The picture therefore keeps its proper appearance for longer, which matters especially when watching TV in a larger group and not everyone is sitting directly in front of the screen. Only at a really large angle can you notice the advantage of QD-OLED panels. In their case viewing angles are practically perfect, while with the WOLED version the colours and brightness then start to change slightly.

Viewing angles are one of the big advantages of the S85H and OLED panels in general. Even when you view the screen from well off to the side, the picture still retains good contrast, brightness and colour saturation. In this respect the S85H performs decidedly better than practically any LCD or Mini-LED TV on the market today. Only QD-OLED panels really do even better, keeping colours even more stable at wide angles. Those, however, are only found in higher-end models.

Daytime performance

6.5/10

5.1/10

Panel finish
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Samsung S85H: 350 cd/m2

Samsung S90H (WOLED): 473 cd/m2

There is, however, one area where the S90H with a WOLED panel performs better than the QD-OLED version. It's viewing in a brightly sunlit room. Thanks to the presence of a traditional polariser, blacks here don't shift toward grey or a dark burgundy as much as they do on QD-OLED panels. Combined with the new matte coating, this delivers very good results. The picture retains more depth even in strong light, and colours don't lose their vibrancy so quickly. That doesn't mean the screen remains completely black in every condition. Under very strong illumination you can notice a faint purple tint typical of WOLED panels. In the S90H it is partly muted by the matte coating and isn't as obvious. Ultimately both variants perform similarly in this category. WOLED handles black retention in a bright room better, but on the other hand it achieves slightly lower SDR brightness. At times the difference compared with the QD-OLED version can reach around 150 nits.

Samsung S85H is a moderately bright TV. In our measurements the average SDR brightness was around 350 nits, so it should be enough for normal daytime viewing unless the TV is in a very sunlit living room. In a moderately lit room the picture remains viewable, but with large windows and light falling directly on the screen the S85H’s capabilities start to run out. We have a few more comments about the WOLED SE panel itself. The panel design change compared with the previous generation has affected how the screen handles reflections, and unfortunately it’s not for the better. Reflections are more noticeable than on earlier WOLED panels. LG Display tried to partly mask this effect with a more satin screen finish that diffuses light, but it doesn’t solve the issue completely. With a strong light source the reflection becomes quite large and a characteristic greyish halo appears around it. Photos clearly show that such a reflection can occupy a large part of the image and strongly affect how it’s perceived. So the S85H doesn’t really change the approach compared with cheaper OLEDs when it comes to daytime viewing. It performs best in the evening or in a room where you have at least partial control over the light. You can still use it comfortably during the day, but it’s definitely not a TV designed for a very bright living room.

Panel details

Backlight Type
WRGB OLED
WRGB OLED
Software version during testing
T-RSMHDEUC-0100-120 4.3, E4601200, BT - G. albo 1204
1204
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV Panel details
Review Samsung S85H TV Panel details

Samsung S90H (WOLED)

Samsung S85H

TV features

7.3/10

7.3/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Tizen
  • System performance
    Very good
    Very good
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S90H (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features
Review Samsung S85H TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    No
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Classic TV

With regular cable or terrestrial TV, Samsung doesn't offer any revolutions compared with last year's model. Putting the marketing AI features to one side, you simply get a solid, traditional package: a full set of tuners, a CI slot for a conditional-access module (CAM), teletext and a convenient RF remote that doesn't need to be pointed directly at the screen. The problem is that the competition offers exactly the same today, and the S90H adds nothing in this area. What's more, the S90 series has lost the PIP function, picture-in-picture. If you liked keeping an eye on the news in the corner of the screen while watching another programme, you can't do that here.

Smart TV: Tizen

While there are few novelties for traditional TV, Tizen for 2026 performs really well. The main point is that the system runs incredibly smoothly and responds to commands without hesitation. Any animation stutter or lag when navigating menus has disappeared. Although it's Samsung's proprietary platform rather than the Google TV many prefer, the app library is complete and includes all the major VOD services. Cloud-gaming fans will also be pleased, as the gaming section has been thoroughly polished. For everyday Smart TV use, it's an exceptionally fast and mature environment.

Tizen

The Samsung S85H runs on Tizen and it's hard to fault its smart features. The system is fast, responsive and offers one of the largest app selections on the market. Besides the major streaming platforms, you'll also find plenty of less popular services, so it's unlikely you'll miss anything essential. Samsung is also expanding SmartThings, integration with other devices and an increasing number of AI-powered features. There are really a lot of capabilities here and some users will probably never even explore half of them. A big plus is Samsung's promised seven years of system updates. For a TV, which we typically keep much longer than a phone or computer, that matters. Tizen should therefore keep receiving new features and fixes for a long time, rather than being abandoned after two or three years. The S85H doesn't feel like a cheaper model either – you essentially get the same extensive ecosystem that Samsung offers in its more expensive TVs.

Traditional features

Samsung's approach to traditional TV features looks completely different. It's clear the company has been increasingly prioritising "modern" services over traditional ones for several years. So the S85H isn't a TV that will especially appeal to people used to full-featured handling of regular broadcast TV. The included remote illustrates this well. It's small, minimalist and only has the essential buttons, but lacks a traditional number pad. For streaming this is convenient, but for frequent viewing of traditional broadcast TV without a set-top box, not everyone will like it. It's simply a consequence of the direction Samsung is taking with its TVs...

Apps

9.3/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player handles most popular video, audio and photo formats without any problems. The range of supported files is broad enough that the inability to install external apps like VLC isn't an issue at all. However, we encountered one serious bug when trying to open HEIC photos from an iPhone. The TV not only failed to display the files, it caused Tizen to completely freeze. The system stopped responding to the remote and we had to unplug it. This is a clear software bug that Samsung should patch as soon as possible in the next firmware update.

The USB file player on the Samsung S85H works quickly and without major problems. The TV handles both videos and photos well, and with the latter we had no issues with unusual resolutions or high megapixel counts. Subtitle support is also a plus, as Polish characters display correctly and nothing extra needs to be set up. The only thing we really missed was support for HEIC, the image format commonly used by Apple devices. Aside from that, the built-in player performs very well and will be more than enough for most people for everyday use with a USB stick or USB drive.

Sound

8.4/10

7.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    86dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Theoretically, the audio specification in the S90 series has been unchanged for several years. We still get a 2.1 setup with a total power of 40 W, so before testing we assumed that noticeably better sound would mainly concern the largest variants. Yet the 65-inch model we tested sounded noticeably better than its predecessors. The sound is fuller, more dynamic and has more "body" than the dry technical specs would suggest. We don't know whether Samsung changed the speakers themselves or if the improvement mainly comes from better tuning and software optimisation, but the effect is audible from the first moments. For such a slim TV the S90H performs really well and for many people may be sufficient even without a soundbar. Our only real gripe is the lack of DTS:X support, which is unfortunately disappearing from TVs more and more. There is Dolby Atmos, though, so streaming service users are unlikely to notice much of a problem. Those who mainly use Blu-ray discs may be left wanting, since DTS tracks still appear quite often on them.

* In the review we used the S90H variant. The S92H is also available for sale, equipped with two additional 20 W drivers. That gives a 2.1.2 configuration with a total power of 60 W, so you can expect stronger, more spacious sound. We can't confirm this, however, as we didn't have the opportunity to test that version.

Sound-wise the S85H hasn’t really changed compared with its predecessor. It still uses a fairly basic 2.0 setup with a total output of 20 W, which sounds fine and, for such a slim TV, can even add a bit of bass. It’s perfectly adequate for everyday TV viewing, but it doesn’t reach the level of pricier models that can deliver fuller, more immersive sound. With that picture, it practically begs for at least a soundbar. All the more so as the S85H supports Dolby Atmos and Samsung’s proprietary Q-Symphony, which lets a compatible Samsung soundbar work with the TV speakers rather than completely replace them. If you want to get more from this setup for movies, an external sound system is the most sensible addition.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

86dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy