Samsung S85F (WOLED) vs Philips OLED950

Direct comparison

S85F / FAU / FAE

Info

OLED950 / OLED+

Available screen sizes: 65”77”83”

Available screen sizes: 65”77”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.8

8.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.9

    8.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.6

    8.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.5

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    9.0

    9.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    7.6

    6.5

  • Watching in bright light

    5.3

    7.3

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    6.5

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.2

    8.2

Advantages

  • Remarkable black and contrast

  • Great picture in SDR and HDR content after calibration

  • Very good motion smoothness – 120 Hz OLED panel

  • Rich set of features for gamers: VRR, Game Bar, low input lag

  • 4 HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps

  • Advanced and smoothly operating Tizen system

  • Solar Remote with multiple capabilities

  • Amazing peak brightness, exceeding 2000 nits on test panels (Tandem OLED matrix)

  • Perfect black and infinite contrast

  • Support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Excellent gaming features: supports 4K@120Hz, VRR, ALLM, and 144 Hz mode

  • Very low input lag

  • Impressive, 4-sided Ambilight system

  • Google TV system offering access to a vast library of apps

  • Backlit remote, charging via USB-C connector

Disadvantages

No like
  • No USB recording function and no PiP

  • No Dolby Vision

  • Poorer viewing angles, colour gamut coverage, and lower brightness than the QD-OLED panel variant

  • Only two HDMI ports in standard 2.1

  • Remote control communicating via infrared (requires aiming at the receiver)

  • Very high price compared to market competition

  • Sound quality noticeably weaker than in the lower model OLED910

  • Slight issues with posterisation

Our verdict

Samsung S85F in the tested version with a WOLED panel is a television that must be evaluated primarily through the lens of its price. As befits organic technology, it offers perfect, almost ideal black levels and infinite contrast in cinematic conditions. This feature alone will make a huge impression on most buyers, especially when transitioning from any LCD television. However, it cannot be denied that in direct comparison with the 55-inch QD-OLED variant, the WOLED version shows some weaknesses. It is slightly dimmer, particularly in bright full-screen scenes, and offers noticeably worse viewing angles. Nevertheless, the rest of its advantages remain intact. Motion smoothness is at a high level – the 120 Hz panel handles both sports and action films exceptionally well. And if someone plans to connect a console to the S85F, they will receive a complete set of advantages: low input lag, variable refresh rate, Game Bar, and full HDMI 2.1 support. In everyday use, we were assisted by the Tizen system – closed but incredibly polished. It reacts quickly, offers a rich selection of applications, and features like AirPlay and voice control make it hard to find something more complete in this category. Indeed, the S85F in the WOLED variant is not the perfect television and takes a backseat to its sibling with the QD-OLED panel. However, its biggest weapon is its absurdly low price. The purchase cost is almost laughable in relation to the offered capabilities. It remains an excellent and, above all, affordable OLED that for a vast number of users will be one of the best and most cost-effective televisions on the market.

Philips OLED950 is undoubtedly a technological showcase that redefines many aspects of what we can expect from a home entertainment centre. The use of the groundbreaking Tandem OLED panel brings us to the absolute peak in terms of image quality. The combination of infinite black and perfect contrast with brightness that can exceed the magical barrier of 2000 nits in HDR mode produces effects that are, at times, breathtaking. Whether we’re watching movies in a sunlit lounge or gaming at night with the support of a four-sided Ambilight system, the experience is simply phenomenal. It’s a complete screen that will satisfy both the cinema enthusiast seeking fidelity in Dolby Vision, and the gamer demanding 144 Hz and perfect motion response.

However, this awe for the raw performance of the panel is mixed with a sense of inadequacy when we consider the manufacturer's promises regarding image processing. Philips has heavily promoted the use of the "dual" P5 processor, suggesting that it would be a remedy for all the woes of digital signal processing. However, reality proved to be less revolutionary. In our tests, the difference compared to models equipped with the standard, single P5 chip was nearly imperceptible in everyday use. Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions and posterization in difficult scenes, although rare, still occur. Considering the astronomical price of this model, we expected a significantly greater qualitative leap in this aspect that would justify such high positioning of the equipment. The question of value for money becomes the biggest problem for this otherwise outstanding television. When we look at the market with a cool eye, the situation for the 950 model becomes complicated. It’s not just about the strong competition from cheaper flagships like the LG G5 or Samsung S95F, but also about the "fratricidal" battle within Philips' own offerings. It turns out that the lower positioned OLED910 model offers us practically the same, brilliant image generated by the identical panel. Moreover, the 910 model outshines in audio, offering an integrated soundbar from Bowers & Wilkins, which is simply missing in the more expensive 950 model due to a different design. We are thus faced with a paradox: we get the same image and inferior sound, but we have to pay significantly more. Therefore, although the OLED950 is a fantastic screen, in 2025 the title of "Best Philips Television" and our recommendation goes to the model OLED910.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Premium
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Base adjustment
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

10/10

Contrast:

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

When it comes to black and contrast, we must be honest – this is the area where the differences between QD-OLED and WOLED panels are virtually non-existent under typical cinema conditions. We can state with full responsibility: the Samsung S85F equipped with a WOLED panel achieves incredible and unparalleled results in this aspect. No matter what scene you’re watching – whether it’s a dynamic action movie or a dark thriller – we get the infinite contrast and perfect black that we expect from any OLED television. These are results that can impress even the most demanding movie enthusiasts. It’s worth highlighting that such deep, absolute blacks can only be offered by televisions with organic panels. Under cinema conditions, as seen in our measurements, the luminance level of black is zero. So if you dream of a screen that can "turn off" the light in a scene just as effectively as an arthouse cinema in a dark room, we are pleased to state that the S85F, also in the WOLED variant, is one of those televisions.

There’s no need to elaborate here. Like every OLED TV, the Philips OLED950 has perfect black levels and contrast. Regardless of the film scene being watched, whether it's night shots or materials in a 2.39:1 aspect ratio with black bars, you can count on flawless black without any blooming or brightening. This is one of the biggest advantages of OLED technology over LCD and Mini-LED TVs. There are no local dimming algorithm games or compromises here. Black always remains black. The only thing that can be noticed in our tests is the scene with the helicopter from Sicario 2. The OLED950 quite clearly accentuates details in the shadows. However, this is a feature of our test unit, more related to the character of the image reproduction than the quality of black itself. In this regard, everything here is at the highest level.

HDR effect quality

5.9/10

8.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 97.0%, Bt.2020: 70.7%
DCI P3: 99.7%, Bt.2020: 82.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

672 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

673 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

718 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

670 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

276 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1910 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2084 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2194 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2179 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1370 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED950

Samsung S85F (WOLED)

Luminance of RGB colors

Luminance of RGB colors

For most of the time, let's say in 90% of film scenes, viewers will hardly see any difference between the S85F versions. When small but very bright light points appear on screen – a lantern in a dark alley, a gunshot, the sun breaking through the clouds – this WOLED panel (just like the smaller S85F) performs exceptionally well. Our measurements showed a peak brightness of around 750 nits. We can confidently state: this is a great result that guarantees fantastic HDR effects. The problem arises in a very specific, uncomfortable situation for any OLED. We're talking about the moment when the entire screen has to shine at full brightness clearly. Examples include a white background screen, a skiing scene, or our test sequences (5) from the film The Meg. And here, unfortunately, the results diverge quite significantly against the WOLED panel variant. Our measurement equipment was able to measure a maximum of around 250 to 300 nits of brightness under such conditions. To be clear: the same model on a QD-OLED panel in the same test is almost twice as bright. The second issue: colours. And here we also have to be honest – QD-OLED has a structural advantage. Why? It’s simple. QD-OLED creates colours from three components (red, green, and blue) and doesn’t need an additional white subpixel. The WOLED panel we’re testing here uses that white subpixel, mainly to boost overall brightness. The effect is that QD-OLED is able to display a slightly wider colour palette, and the colours are a bit "cleaner." But let’s be clear: it’s not that the colours on this WOLED panel are bad! Quite the opposite, they are really very good. Coverage of the DCI-P3 film colour gamut at 97% and 71% for the wider BT.2020 palette is still high-end. We just have to honestly admit that those few percentage points of coverage advantage lie with QD-OLED technology and may be noticeable in very specific moments.

OLED950 is a phenomenal TV for consuming content in HDR format, primarily thanks to the use of innovative Tandem OLED technology. With this technology, the screen can generate astronomical brightness levels, reaching over 2000 nits in movie scenes (on test patterns). This is an outstanding result that places the OLED950 model among the elite displays available on the market. However, it is worth noting a specific aspect of this solution – at moments when full-screen flashes of light appear, brightness can drop by as much as half. Nonetheless, it is important to highlight that levels above 1000 nits on a full screen are still an outstanding result. This allows HDR content to be displayed exactly as filmmakers intended, maintaining the dynamics and impact of bright scenes.

The use of Tandem OLED technology also brought tangible benefits in terms of colour reproduction, improving elements that traditional WOLED panels had issues with compared to QD-OLED competition. In the case of the OLED950, the colour gamut coverage is wider than in classic WOLED panels, reaching nearly 100% of the DCI-P3 colour space and a solid 82% of the demanding BT.2020 palette. While these results still do not match the highly refined achievements of QD-OLED panels, the difference becomes less noticeable during real-world use. We cannot deny that in the vast majority of films, colours look simply fantastic on this model – they are saturated, vibrant, and full of depth.

Factory color reproduction

5.5/10

5.5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

When it comes to factory colour reproduction, our test unit in SDR mode suffered from a slight deficit in red and yellow. This resulted in a subtle yellowish tint visible in shades of white. However, this is not the biggest issue with the S85F. Similar to the QD-OLED panel variant, the main problem with this model is the way it presents HDR content. When we look at the EOTF curve graph, it’s easy to see that the TV has quite significant issues with strong image over-brightening. This results in the final image becoming very unnatural in many scenes.

We tested the OLED950 model in Film mode. Although it is intended to be the best and most accurate preset on this television, in practice, it proved to be not without flaws. Interestingly, in the specimen we tested, the biggest challenge was not the white balance itself – although it did show a slight tendency to give the image a pinkish tint. The main issue lay in the way the television managed brightness, both in everyday SDR content and in demanding HDR scenes. Analysis of the gamma chart and the EOTF curve leads to one key conclusion: the television excessively exposes brightness in the lower registers. This results in the image appearing less contrasty than what the panel technology allows. Details in dark areas, which should remain perfectly dimmed (the characteristic "OLED black"), are simply unnecessarily highlighted and brightened. Fortunately, these errors can be corrected using the appropriate tools, so – as always – we proceeded with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

9/10

9.4/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After conducting calibration in Filmmaker mode, we managed to eliminate most unwanted effects. In SDR content, the TV performs exceptionally well, and its colour reproduction errors do not exceed a value of 2, which is an outstanding result. The HDR content looks a bit worse, though still very good. Although we managed to eliminate a significant unnaturalness of the image caused by an overly high EOTF curve, the most discerning observers may notice that it is not perfectly aligned. It runs slightly below the reference curve, which would suggest that the S85F has minor issues in displaying all details in the image. We must immediately point out that it is highly unlikely for the average viewer to notice any deficiencies in the picture. We assess the final result after calibration as exemplary.

As you can see, the OLED950, after a professional calibration process, becomes an absolutely phenomenal display that, without a shadow of a doubt, can be placed alongside the best televisions currently available in the world. This equipment needed only a professional touch to showcase its full potential and eliminate factory shortcomings. The residual errors in the Color Checker tests and the fidelity of the colour palette speak for themselves. We are dealing with an almost perfect device here. A true window to the world, offering image quality of the highest order.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.3/10

7.1/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Another issue with the S85F version featuring the WOLED panel, noticeable compared to the QD-OLED variant, is the quality of fluidity in tonal transitions. In very bright moments, it's evident that the colour blending is not perfect, and sometimes it can be seen with the naked eye. While the overall quality of gradients is still good, certain flaws of the panel produced by LG Displays become apparent, which are not as visible in competing panels (QD-OLED).

If we had to point out the weaker point of the OLED950 model compared to market competitors like the G5 and S95F, it would be – as with most TVs from this manufacturer – the digital signal processing. Although the processor used here is referred to as a "dual" one, our tests in practice did not show significant changes compared to the lower positioned OLED910 model. The differences are actually minimal, which only reflected in a slight cosmetic increase in rating in this category. In very demanding, especially dark scenes, one can still occasionally notice issues with slight posterization. However, it should be clearly stated that this is a "flaw" that the average viewer will very rarely notice during normal usage, and the overall reception remains at a high level.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7.1/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The processing of tonal transitions (gradients) in the S85F is at a high level. The television effectively handles posterization (the "stepping" effect of colours), even with heavily compressed content, for example, from streaming services. However, using this feature requires a certain compromise. We noticed that the noise reduction algorithm is quite aggressive – even at the lowest setting, it can eliminate the natural film grain, which for many viewers is part of the film's aesthetics. The "Standard" setting seems to be a golden mean, without causing a noticeable loss of important details, so we can recommend it. However, we advise against using the "High" level, which, in addition to noise, also removes desired details such as texture or the structure of objects on the screen.

The upscaling process of lower resolution content works very well in the S85F. The image is sharp and clear. The only minor imperfection we managed to observe is occasional slight aliasing on the edges. The television still displays characteristics typical of this manufacturer, namely active "overscan" (a slight image enlargement). This should be kept in mind, especially when watching older content, as it may result in minimal clipping of the original frame.

Upscaling

In terms of the scaling of the image, the proprietary P5 processor performs just as well as in most of the manufacturer's models. Lower resolution content gains a very soft and plastic character. This presentation will certainly appeal to many people. However, if you prefer sharper contours, you can gently enhance them using the appropriate slider in the TV menu. In this aspect, it's really hard to nitpick. The image simply looks very good and additionally, there are no issues with overscan.

Smoothing and Distortion Reduction

The smoothing of tonal transitions performs somewhat worse. In the settings, we find an option called "Distortion Reduction." This allows for a three-level adjustment of the processor's intervention. Unfortunately, the Minimum setting works poorly and the smoothing effects are minimal. The Medium level gives a decent result, but it also begins to smooth out the details of the actors' skin. On the other hand, the Maximum setting works too aggressively. It removes far too many details from the face and background elements or can even eliminate film grain. To achieve the optimal effect, it's worth playing around with these settings at home and adjusting them to your liking. It might seem that the Medium option represents the best compromise here.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
120Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
50%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

S85F is a model with impressive speed. The use of a 120 Hz OLED panel ensures that dynamic scenes, both in games and during sports broadcasts, perform as expected: smoothly, sharply, and without loss of clarity. A key role here is played by the lightning-fast pixel response time, which is a natural advantage of OLED technology. Transitions between frames are instantaneous, and the image remains clear even during the fastest camera movements. Moving objects, like a ball on the field or a car in a chase scene, are clear and free from the characteristic smearing of LCD panels (so-called "trail").

The motion reproduction on the OLED950 model is simply perfect. This is typical for screens of this kind (OLED 120Hz+), as the panel shows no motion blur at all. This allows us to enjoy perfect sharpness in practically any conditions. A significant part of this is due not only to the nature of organic technology itself. Equally important work is done here by the smoothing systems employed by the manufacturer.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.2/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 120Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

85F has practically everything on board to become the dream screen for gaming. It features four full-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 48 Gb/s, support for VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) and ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode). Additionally, there is a super-detailed Game Bar that clearly shows all the key parameters. However, the real gem is the Game Motion Plus feature. This motion smoother dedicated to games makes the animation more pleasant to the eye while only slightly increasing input lag. This is a rare and well-functioning combination that deserves big applause for Samsung.

Now comes the moment where we need to vent a little. The lack of Dolby Vision in Samsung TVs has become standard, so there's no use hoping (unless something changes in the future). Unfortunately, it's much harder to explain the disappearance of support for HGiG after one of the software updates. HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) is a key mode that allows for precise representation of brightness in HDR games, as intended by the creators. Without it, HDR calibration on consoles becomes less accurate, which may result in images that are too dark in the shadows or overly bright in the light areas. Perhaps Samsung will fix this in the next update – we have high hopes for that. Because if HGiG returns, the S85F will become nearly the perfect TV for gamers.

[UPDATE] We have updated our tests of Samsung TVs from the 2025 lineup due to the release of software version 1131, which restored the crucial HGiG feature for gamers.

OLED950 is almost the perfect television for gamers. This is due not only to the unique atmosphere created by the Ambilight system during gameplay. The most important aspect here is the solid hardware support. We literally have everything you would expect from a modern gaming display. The manufacturer has implemented two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s. This gives us access to gaming in 4K resolution at 120 frames per second. There is, of course, support for VRR technology and the automatic game mode ALLM. The device handles any HDR signal with ease, whether we’re using Dolby Vision or the HGiG standard.

We have access to all settings from one place thanks to the special Game Bar overlay. While this interface may not be the most graphically attractive on the market, it fully accomplishes its task. It displays all the important signal parameters and offers useful additions. Gamers can take advantage of the minimap zoom function or add a fixed crosshair on the screen, which can be seen as a small aid in online competition. The adjustment of contrast range also proves to be useful. It allows you to brighten shadows and achieve better visibility of enemies hiding in dark corners of the map.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
10 ms
12 ms
1080p120
5 ms
5 ms
2160p60
10 ms
12 ms
2160p120
5 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
10 ms
12 ms
2160p120
5 ms
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
12 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

In this category, the S85F shows its true colours. The measured values – 5 ms for 120 Hz content and around 10 ms for 60 Hz – are results that can be described in one word in the world of televisions: phenomenal. This means that the response to player movements is practically instantaneous. Pressing a button on the controller results in action on the screen with no noticeable delay. In dynamic games, where a fraction of a second determines victory or defeat, such values make a huge difference. There's no question of a nervy "wait" until the image catches up with our commands. The S85F gives a sense of full control – and that's how it should be in equipment aspiring to be the perfect screen for gamers.

According to what we have come to expect from TVs in this segment, the signal delay in this model is practically negligible. Our measurements indicated nearly reference values: just 5 ms at 120 Hz refresh rate and 12 ms for the 60 Hz signal. This means an instantaneous response to every command issued via the controller, mouse, or keyboard. With such low results, the only limitation during dynamic online gameplay remains your own reflexes and lack of "skill," rather than the hardware. 😉

Compatibility with PC

7.6/10

6.5/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
5ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RWGB
BWRG
Max refresh rate
120Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

What about connecting to a computer? We’re quick to respond: the S85F excels in this role. The combination of lightning-fast input lag and a 120 Hz panel is the recipe for a great gaming experience on PC. Both fast-paced shooters and more leisurely RPG titles benefit from the rapid response and smooth animations, capable of captivating you for hours on end. Of course, it’s not perfect. We must mention the specific construction of the WOLED panel. It consists of four subpixels (WRGB), which is a different structure than the classic RGB found in monitors. As a result, if we sit very close to the screen, we might notice that fonts aren’t as perfectly sharp as we would like them to be. However, this is not a major issue and shouldn't be a bother in everyday use. Especially since the TV properly handles 4:4:4 chroma signal.

In this category, the situation looks quite specific. If we look at the OLED950 through the eyes of a gamer, we get a phenomenal display. It performs excellently not only with consoles but also when connected to a powerful computer. We have access here to an additional 144 Hz mode, full support for G-Sync and FreeSync technology, and very low signal latency. One could risk saying that for PC gamers, this is an almost ideal monitor.

However, problems arise when we examine the readability of fonts. We are not only referring to the unusual subpixel arrangement of the WOLED panels (BWRG), which causes specific edge discoloration of text in all televisions of this type. The tested model struggles with correctly displaying Chroma 4:4:4 sampling. This is mainly noticeable when we display coloured text on another colourful background. The letters then gain strange shading, unnatural contours, and unwanted artifacts. It’s a bit of a shame, although we must honestly admit that this is a very specific flaw. For 99% of you, no one is likely to notice this during normal entertainment. However, if you belong to that 1% of people planning to purchase the OLED950 strictly as a monitor for office work, you may feel disappointed.

Viewing angles

7.5/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
29%
29%

As is typical for OLED technology, the viewing angles on the S85F are very good. The image maintains its properties even when viewed from the side, which is a clear advantage over most LCD televisions. However, we must note that it is not on the level known from QD-OLED panels. In the case of the tested WOLED panel, with considerable deviation from the screen axis, a slight drop in brightness and a subtle change in white shades can be observed. QD-OLED remains unmatched in this regard, offering nearly perfect picture quality no matter where we are looking at it from.

As befits organic technology, the viewing angles here are practically very good. We can enjoy a great image no matter where on the couch we look at the screen. The only caveat arises when directly comparing the Tandem OLED matrix used here with the competitors' solutions. Compared to last year's LG panels equipped with the MLA filter or the best QD-OLED screens from Samsung, the angles in the OLED950 are slightly weaker. They are not quite as perfect as those of the mentioned rivals. Nevertheless, they generally still maintain a very high level, and in everyday use, it’s hard to consider this a downside.

Daytime performance

5.3/10

7.3/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

Philips OLED950: 615 cd/m2

Samsung S85F (WOLED): 305 cd/m2

We must state clearly that working in a brightly lit room is not the strongest suit of the S85F. We are dealing with a moderately bright OLED panel here. Our measurements showed that the average brightness of the screen in "TV" mode hovers around 300 nits. For some users, this may be too low, especially in rooms with a lot of daylight. Of course, for moderately bright living rooms, this TV is perfect. However, it is not a model we would recommend for exceptionally bright, sun-drenched interiors. This issue is exacerbated by the anti-reflective coating used. We noted that it does not suppress reflections from the surroundings as well as the version with a QD-OLED panel, especially when direct sunlight hits the screen.

The OLED950 model performs exceptionally well in really bright rooms without any concerns. A key advantage here is the previously mentioned very high brightness of the panel. Considering it's OLED technology, the performance is impressive. One could confidently say that in this regard, this television can compete with mid-range Mini-LED models. In the world of organic panels, this is not such a given, which is a significant plus for the device being tested.

However, there is one drawback that could be termed as its Achilles' heel. Similar to most Tandem OLED panels, the manufacturer has applied a glossy screen coating here. Unfortunately, it doesn't handle direct light reflections very well. It's worth bearing this in mind when planning the placement of the television in relation to windows, as reflections may be noticeable.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Software version during testing
T-PTMFDEUC-0090-1110.7
Image processor
MT5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV Panel details
Review Philips OLED950 TV Panel details

TV features

7.3/10

6.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features

Features of the Classic S85F TV

The S85F was not really designed with fans of traditional television in mind. You'll find no PiP function here (which is a bit surprising since Samsung usually offers it) nor the ability to record programmes to USB from built-in tuners. Fortunately, the basics are all here – teletext and a clear channel guide – so it's perfectly adequate for regular, everyday viewing. The included remote, although at first glance simple and lacking a numerical keypad, allows you to control multiple devices. This means that when you connect, for example, a Canal+ decoder, you won't need to have two remotes on the coffee table – the one for the TV will be entirely sufficient.

SmartTV S85F: Tizen

The smart portion is quite a different story. Tizen is one of the most advanced operating systems in televisions. It runs smoothly and supports all popular internet functions – from screen mirroring, through AirPlay, to voice search. The strongest point of Tizen is its integration with the SmartThings app, which can serve as a central hub for controlling the entire home. Of course, like any closed system, Tizen has its limitations – such as a smaller app library compared to GoogleTV. However, looking at the current list of available applications, it's hard to point out anything that could actually be missing.

Smart Features

The biggest plus of the OLED950 is the Google TV system — the manufacturer is increasingly moving away from it in cheaper models in favour of TitanOS, but here we thankfully still have a fully-fledged Android-based environment. This means access to a vast library of apps, a voice assistant, and convenient features like Chromecast. For unknown reasons, we were once again unable to activate Windows Miracast in the editorial office, despite the manufacturer declaring this option is available. On the plus side: Apple device users can sleep easy, as the TV supports AirPlay.

Classic Features

In terms of “classics,” the TV offers a rather basic set: teletext and Bluetooth connectivity. The biggest complaints revolve around the remote. On one hand, it is sensibly designed with backlighting, “hybrid” switching between typical functions and the numeric keypad, and charging via USB-C. On the other hand, enthusiasm quickly wanes when it turns out that you need to aim it at the screen, as it operates on infrared.

Apps

9.3/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the S85F performs excellently – practically everything you throw on a USB drive or hard drive will be played back without the slightest problem. Minor shortcomings only occur in the handling of some less popular photo formats, but for the vast majority of you, this will be more than sufficient. So it can confidently be said that for home use, the built-in player is more than solid.

The built-in media player in the OLED950 model works exceptionally well. During our tests, the device handled practically every format we threw at it. Whether they were video files, audio tracks, or photos, the TV played them without any issues. It's hard to find any weaknesses in its support for the most popular standards. However, if someone still finds something lacking (which seems unlikely), the operating system comes to the rescue. Thanks to the presence of Google TV, we are not solely reliant on the default solutions. At any time, you can enter the app store and install an external player, such as the popular VLC or Kodi. This ensures that the TV can handle literally any file from our home library.

Sound

7.2/10

8.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    80dB
    85dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Built-in speakers with a power of 20 W on paper may not make a big impression, but in practice, the S85F can surprise. It sounds really nice, and at times you can even pick up a subtle bass, which is not a given in this class of speakers. The TV does not support the DTS format, which by 2025 unfortunately became a standard for most manufacturers. A pleasant surprise, however, is the support for Dolby Atmos. Of course, talking about “spatial” sound in the case of two speakers placed at the bottom of the housing would be a slight exaggeration, but it's good that Samsung offers such a feature in this model.

The speaker setup here is a 2.1 system with a total power of 70 W, which offers a solid dose of quality sound. It plays clearly, and thanks to the additional subwoofer at the back of the enclosure, the sound is deep and has a distinct punch. This element is often lacking in cheaper models, where the bass is practically non-existent. However, we must face the truth when comparing it to the OLED910 model. That television, equipped with a built-in Bowers & Wilkins soundbar, simply performs much better. Was it a good decision? In our opinion, the outstanding audio of the 910 model provides greater value. Choosing the 950 model makes sense mainly if you are big fans of Ambilight, and you’ve got the sound issue sorted out with an external home theatre or soundbar.

Sound Quality Test