Samsung S85F (WOLED) vs Dreame S100

Direct comparison

S85F / FAU / FAE

Info

Available screen sizes: 65”77”83”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.8

6.8

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.9

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.6

    6.2

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.5

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    9.0

    7.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    7.6

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    5.3

    6.0

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    5.9

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.2

    8.3

Advantages

  • Remarkable black and contrast

  • Great picture in SDR and HDR content after calibration

  • Very good motion smoothness – 120 Hz OLED panel

  • Rich set of features for gamers: VRR, Game Bar, low input lag

  • 4 HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps

  • Advanced and smoothly operating Tizen system

  • Solar Remote with multiple capabilities

  • Great viewing angles (thanks to the ADS panel)

  • Pretty good blacks thanks to Mini-LED backlighting

  • Good colours thanks to the PFS filter (advertised as QLED)

  • High motion fluidity (144 Hz panel)

  • Low input lag (in game mode)

  • A lot of gaming features, including two HDMI 2.1 ports (VRR, ALLM, and Game Bar)

  • Google TV system with a rich library of apps

  • Good sound thanks to the built-in “soundbar”

Disadvantages

No like
  • No USB recording function and no PiP

  • No Dolby Vision

  • Poorer viewing angles, colour gamut coverage, and lower brightness than the QD-OLED panel variant

  • Underdeveloped local dimming algorithms (can cause annoying brightness drops)

  • Outdated image processor and poor digital processing of the Google TV system

  • Software bugs, occasional stuttering

  • Useless Filmmaker mode (completely blocks any changes to picture settings)

  • Poor HDR format implementation in games (no HGiG support and high input lag in Dolby Vision mode)

Our verdict

Samsung S85F in the tested version with a WOLED panel is a television that must be evaluated primarily through the lens of its price. As befits organic technology, it offers perfect, almost ideal black levels and infinite contrast in cinematic conditions. This feature alone will make a huge impression on most buyers, especially when transitioning from any LCD television. However, it cannot be denied that in direct comparison with the 55-inch QD-OLED variant, the WOLED version shows some weaknesses. It is slightly dimmer, particularly in bright full-screen scenes, and offers noticeably worse viewing angles. Nevertheless, the rest of its advantages remain intact. Motion smoothness is at a high level – the 120 Hz panel handles both sports and action films exceptionally well. And if someone plans to connect a console to the S85F, they will receive a complete set of advantages: low input lag, variable refresh rate, Game Bar, and full HDMI 2.1 support. In everyday use, we were assisted by the Tizen system – closed but incredibly polished. It reacts quickly, offers a rich selection of applications, and features like AirPlay and voice control make it hard to find something more complete in this category. Indeed, the S85F in the WOLED variant is not the perfect television and takes a backseat to its sibling with the QD-OLED panel. However, its biggest weapon is its absurdly low price. The purchase cost is almost laughable in relation to the offered capabilities. It remains an excellent and, above all, affordable OLED that for a vast number of users will be one of the best and most cost-effective televisions on the market.

Dreame S100 is a successful, though still somewhat rough debut in the Mini-LED segment. Hardware-wise, the TV stands up for itself: Mini-LED technology with local dimming provides a deep and appealing black for the average viewer, and the IPS/ADS panel offers brilliant viewing angles. This is an interesting combination, as it is extremely rare in the LCD TV segment, which will certainly please those with wide living rooms or large corner sofas. If we add to this a full gaming package (HDMI 2.1, 144 Hz), the Google TV system with an almost endless number of apps, and very strong 4.1.2 audio with 70 W power, which performs well above the market average, we have an incredibly versatile screen.

Where's the catch? In the software. Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 suffers from typical “growing pains” – the outdated processor struggles with advanced digital processing, and the local dimming algorithms can be frustrating in more demanding scenes. Additionally, the Google TV system itself can occasionally experience slight stutters. So if you're looking for a well-equipped Mini-LED for a wide living room and are willing to overlook its minor system hiccups that the manufacturer can hopefully fix with future updates – this is a very interesting option. The hardware potential is huge, although the software still needs some final polishing.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio)
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Black
Stand
Base adjustment
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 160 (10 x 16)

Contrast:

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

32,850:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

11,800:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,900:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,650:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

1,700:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

When it comes to black and contrast, we must be honest – this is the area where the differences between QD-OLED and WOLED panels are virtually non-existent under typical cinema conditions. We can state with full responsibility: the Samsung S85F equipped with a WOLED panel achieves incredible and unparalleled results in this aspect. No matter what scene you’re watching – whether it’s a dynamic action movie or a dark thriller – we get the infinite contrast and perfect black that we expect from any OLED television. These are results that can impress even the most demanding movie enthusiasts. It’s worth highlighting that such deep, absolute blacks can only be offered by televisions with organic panels. Under cinema conditions, as seen in our measurements, the luminance level of black is zero. So if you dream of a screen that can "turn off" the light in a scene just as effectively as an arthouse cinema in a dark room, we are pleased to state that the S85F, also in the WOLED variant, is one of those televisions.

The Dreame S100 is a Mini-LED television that features an IPS/ADS panel in its 65" version. This type of panel doesn't inherently offer the best contrast on the market, but thanks to a fairly dense Mini-LED backlight, the black levels in this model are actually quite impressive. In less demanding scenes, the contrast can reach values of 30,000:1. This is a result several times higher and practically impossible to achieve for any type of LCD panel without local dimming technology. This means that the black levels and contrast in the S100 will be quite appealing for the less demanding viewer.

Unfortunately, in more challenging scenes where a considerable number of small elements appear against a black background, the local dimming algorithms in the Dreame S100 don't perform perfectly. The TV can either dim excessively, making the blacks really deep but rendering almost nothing visible on the screen, or go the other way – showcasing a vast amount of detail, but resulting in very poor contrast. The blacks in very demanding scenes around bright objects then take on a greyish hue (halo effect). This is a typical limitation of Mini-LED televisions in the lower and mid-range segments, and unfortunately, the Dreame S100 is no exception, doing particularly poorly in this regard. However, it should be noted that overall, the contrast and black levels here are definitely better than those found in LCD televisions without any form of local dimming technology.

HDR effect quality

5.9/10

3.4/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 97.0%, Bt.2020: 70.7%
DCI P3: 94.6%, Bt.2020: 71.6%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

672 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

673 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

718 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

670 nit

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

276 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

503 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

71 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

241 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

42 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

589 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Dreame S100

Samsung S85F (WOLED)

Luminance of RGB colors

For most of the time, let's say in 90% of film scenes, viewers will hardly see any difference between the S85F versions. When small but very bright light points appear on screen – a lantern in a dark alley, a gunshot, the sun breaking through the clouds – this WOLED panel (just like the smaller S85F) performs exceptionally well. Our measurements showed a peak brightness of around 750 nits. We can confidently state: this is a great result that guarantees fantastic HDR effects. The problem arises in a very specific, uncomfortable situation for any OLED. We're talking about the moment when the entire screen has to shine at full brightness clearly. Examples include a white background screen, a skiing scene, or our test sequences (5) from the film The Meg. And here, unfortunately, the results diverge quite significantly against the WOLED panel variant. Our measurement equipment was able to measure a maximum of around 250 to 300 nits of brightness under such conditions. To be clear: the same model on a QD-OLED panel in the same test is almost twice as bright. The second issue: colours. And here we also have to be honest – QD-OLED has a structural advantage. Why? It’s simple. QD-OLED creates colours from three components (red, green, and blue) and doesn’t need an additional white subpixel. The WOLED panel we’re testing here uses that white subpixel, mainly to boost overall brightness. The effect is that QD-OLED is able to display a slightly wider colour palette, and the colours are a bit "cleaner." But let’s be clear: it’s not that the colours on this WOLED panel are bad! Quite the opposite, they are really very good. Coverage of the DCI-P3 film colour gamut at 97% and 71% for the wider BT.2020 palette is still high-end. We just have to honestly admit that those few percentage points of coverage advantage lie with QD-OLED technology and may be noticeable in very specific moments.

The Dreame S100 is a relatively bright television. In movie mode, the brightness we measured reached around 600 nits. This is a really good result, although not the highest considering the competition in this price range. In full-screen scenes, it's clear that the television can generate an image that hits the mark in terms of brightness. Unfortunately, when more complex scenes appeared on the screen, the local dimming algorithm in this model tried above all to maintain the deepest blacks. However, this came at the expense of the HDR effect – and in a drastic way. In such scenes, the brightness of the bright elements fell below 100 nits, which is a downright tragic result, far from any HDR effect. This aspect can be improved, but there are caveats. You just need to change the local dimming setting in the television's menu; however, then the blacks in such scenes simply turn grey. It's a pity that Dreame wasn't able to refine the local dimming algorithms better, and the S100 is another example that the number of local dimming zones doesn't always translate into a better picture. As a consolation, it's worth noting that the Dreame S100 is marketed as a 'QLED' type television, although it actually uses a PFS LED filter. As a result, the colours are appropriately saturated, and our measured DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage exceeded 94%.

Factory color reproduction

5.5/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

When it comes to factory colour reproduction, our test unit in SDR mode suffered from a slight deficit in red and yellow. This resulted in a subtle yellowish tint visible in shades of white. However, this is not the biggest issue with the S85F. Similar to the QD-OLED panel variant, the main problem with this model is the way it presents HDR content. When we look at the EOTF curve graph, it’s easy to see that the TV has quite significant issues with strong image over-brightening. This results in the final image becoming very unnatural in many scenes.

We tested the Dreame S100 in "movie" mode and definitely recommend using this setting for watching all kinds of content. Interestingly, in the deeper settings of the TV, we also find a dedicated "Filmmaker" mode, which is now available from almost every manufacturer. However, in the case of the Dreame S100, we do not recommend using it – it blocks all settings related to the picture and does not allow for any configuration in the menu - not even a motion smoother. So how do the factory colours fare in the S100? Not too bad, but not great either. The TV itself had a noticeable blue tint, which is clearly evident in our white balance measurements. As a result, the picture was artificially brightened, and the colours had a slight bluish tint. This is also confirmed by the Color Checker palette, which showed how the colour samples leaned towards blue, generating quite significant colour errors. On the other hand, the picture looked definitely better in HDR mode, where the colour errors were not as prominent, although they were still far from ideal. Here, the white balance was also too heavily skewed towards blue, causing quite significant errors in color reproduction.

Color reproduction after calibration

9/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After conducting calibration in Filmmaker mode, we managed to eliminate most unwanted effects. In SDR content, the TV performs exceptionally well, and its colour reproduction errors do not exceed a value of 2, which is an outstanding result. The HDR content looks a bit worse, though still very good. Although we managed to eliminate a significant unnaturalness of the image caused by an overly high EOTF curve, the most discerning observers may notice that it is not perfectly aligned. It runs slightly below the reference curve, which would suggest that the S85F has minor issues in displaying all details in the image. We must immediately point out that it is highly unlikely for the average viewer to notice any deficiencies in the picture. We assess the final result after calibration as exemplary.

The Dreame S100 has proven to be a device very amenable to professional calibration. In its menu, we found a plethora of advanced options that allowed us to effectively correct factory errors. Thanks to the advanced white balance correction – both in SDR and HDR content – we completely eliminated excess blue components. The image instantly became much more natural and pleasant to view. After fully tuning the colours, the errors in the Color Checker test dropped below a Delta E value of 2-3. For the average viewer, this means that any colour distortions became almost impossible to see with the naked eye. It's really a nice surprise, as often new brands in the TV market have significant problems with the correct implementation and functioning of sliders in the calibration menu. Here, everything worked as it should. The only thing we need to criticise is the way the TV manages its brightness in HDR. Due to the specific nature of the local dimming algorithms, our measured EOTF curve shows anomalies. In places where high highlights should appear, there is a slight bump in the curve above the reference line. In practice, this results in unnatural brightening of certain, the brightest elements in movies or games. Despite this minor flaw, professional calibration brings a huge, very positive change to this model.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.3/10

8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Another issue with the S85F version featuring the WOLED panel, noticeable compared to the QD-OLED variant, is the quality of fluidity in tonal transitions. In very bright moments, it's evident that the colour blending is not perfect, and sometimes it can be seen with the naked eye. While the overall quality of gradients is still good, certain flaws of the panel produced by LG Displays become apparent, which are not as visible in competing panels (QD-OLED).

The transition between individual shades on the Dreame S100 is quite good. Analyzing most content in HDR10 format, we did not notice significant issues with banding. Only some very extreme and dark scenes revealed the problem of shade stepping. The situation is somewhat worse for content in Dolby Vision format*. Here, the colour gradation clearly deteriorates, and the tonal transitions from one colour to another are more visible and stand out from each other. Thus, the rating of this element on our site is slightly lower when we take into account viewing (on streaming platforms) in this format.

*we'll add the photos after modifying the site 😉

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

4/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The processing of tonal transitions (gradients) in the S85F is at a high level. The television effectively handles posterization (the "stepping" effect of colours), even with heavily compressed content, for example, from streaming services. However, using this feature requires a certain compromise. We noticed that the noise reduction algorithm is quite aggressive – even at the lowest setting, it can eliminate the natural film grain, which for many viewers is part of the film's aesthetics. The "Standard" setting seems to be a golden mean, without causing a noticeable loss of important details, so we can recommend it. However, we advise against using the "High" level, which, in addition to noise, also removes desired details such as texture or the structure of objects on the screen.

The upscaling process of lower resolution content works very well in the S85F. The image is sharp and clear. The only minor imperfection we managed to observe is occasional slight aliasing on the edges. The television still displays characteristics typical of this manufacturer, namely active "overscan" (a slight image enlargement). This should be kept in mind, especially when watching older content, as it may result in minimal clipping of the original frame.

For scaling and digital processing in the Dreame S100, the technology used is proudly called Dreamind™ Pro AI by the manufacturer. However, it must be clearly stated that this is not a proprietary processor but rather a marketing term for a chip from MediaTek – specifically, the model MT5889. Unfortunately, we are talking about a rather outdated unit from a time when MediaTek lagged significantly behind the competition in terms of performance. This, unfortunately, has a direct impact on the image, as this chip also handles that. The upscaling in the S100 is fairly average, and the processor has a tendency to artificially over-sharpen edges (fortunately, this can be somewhat tempered with the sharpness slider in the menu). In the options, we also find a feature called "Contour Smoothing," which theoretically is supposed to improve tonal transitions. In practice, it contributes almost no improvement – setting it to any level rarely eliminates visible colour banding, but it can unnecessarily blur elements of the image that should remain sharp.

Another issue is the phenomenon of overscan (cropping the edges of the frame), which is practically visible all the time. Although there is the possibility to set the screen to display the full frame in low-resolution materials, it requires activating the aforementioned Filmmaker mode. And as you may know, this mode completely blocks any changes to other sliders in the picture menu. In our test tables, we noted that the television offers an option to disable overscan, as such a function technically exists in the system – however, in everyday use, while maintaining reasonable picture settings, you will not be able to take advantage of it.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

7.7/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
120Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
50%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

S85F is a model with impressive speed. The use of a 120 Hz OLED panel ensures that dynamic scenes, both in games and during sports broadcasts, perform as expected: smoothly, sharply, and without loss of clarity. A key role here is played by the lightning-fast pixel response time, which is a natural advantage of OLED technology. Transitions between frames are instantaneous, and the image remains clear even during the fastest camera movements. Moving objects, like a ball on the field or a car in a chase scene, are clear and free from the characteristic smearing of LCD panels (so-called "trail").

When it comes to motion fluidity, the Dreame S100 performs really well. It features a 144 Hz refresh rate panel, although in reality, the vast majority of people using it in a conventional way will still be limited to 120 Hz (as this is what today's hardware allows aside from PCs). Thanks to the high refresh rate, the image in motion remains really sharp, largely due to the well-functioning MEMC motion smoother. In the menu, we find predefined modes that enable the TV to efficiently generate artificial frames, which effectively enhances the fluidity of dynamic sports shots, but also helps eliminate motion judder in film and TV series material recorded at 24 frames.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.2/10

7.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 120Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

85F has practically everything on board to become the dream screen for gaming. It features four full-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 48 Gb/s, support for VRR (Variable Refresh Rate) and ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode). Additionally, there is a super-detailed Game Bar that clearly shows all the key parameters. However, the real gem is the Game Motion Plus feature. This motion smoother dedicated to games makes the animation more pleasant to the eye while only slightly increasing input lag. This is a rare and well-functioning combination that deserves big applause for Samsung.

Now comes the moment where we need to vent a little. The lack of Dolby Vision in Samsung TVs has become standard, so there's no use hoping (unless something changes in the future). Unfortunately, it's much harder to explain the disappearance of support for HGiG after one of the software updates. HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) is a key mode that allows for precise representation of brightness in HDR games, as intended by the creators. Without it, HDR calibration on consoles becomes less accurate, which may result in images that are too dark in the shadows or overly bright in the light areas. Perhaps Samsung will fix this in the next update – we have high hopes for that. Because if HGiG returns, the S85F will become nearly the perfect TV for gamers.

[UPDATE] We have updated our tests of Samsung TVs from the 2025 lineup due to the release of software version 1131, which restored the crucial HGiG feature for gamers.

The Dreame S100 seems almost like the ideal screen for gamers. The television is equipped with 2 HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 40 Gbps, allowing features such as automatic game mode (ALLM) or VRR frame synchronization in the range of 48-144 Hz to work seamlessly on consoles. On board, we also find a well-designed gaming panel (Game Bar). It allows you to continuously preview the most important parameters - from the activated picture modes, to the number of frames rendered by the console, right through to the option of adding a crosshair in the centre of the screen. All of this looks great on paper; however, the biggest issue with the S100 is its implementation of HDR in games. The television does not have a correctly implemented HGiG format. This means a clueless user may misconfigure the console during the initial setup of the screen. Poor configuration can result in an image that is too dark or overexposed (as a guideline: we suggest setting the brightness in the Xbox console menu to around 600 nits, and in the PS5 to 12 clicks). The Dolby Vision format also proves problematic, as it often did not activate at all on the XBOX – Dreame S100 line. And when it was eventually activated, playing was impossible due to the very high input lag often exceeding 100ms. If the manufacturer manages to improve the HDR gaming experience with an update, the S100 will be truly outstanding hardware for gamers. For now, however, compromises must be accepted.

Input lag

10/10

9.2/10

SDR

1080p60
10 ms
15 ms
1080p120
5 ms
6 ms
2160p60
10 ms
15 ms
2160p120
5 ms
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
10 ms
15 ms
2160p120
5 ms
6 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
127 ms
2160p120 DV
18 ms

In this category, the S85F shows its true colours. The measured values – 5 ms for 120 Hz content and around 10 ms for 60 Hz – are results that can be described in one word in the world of televisions: phenomenal. This means that the response to player movements is practically instantaneous. Pressing a button on the controller results in action on the screen with no noticeable delay. In dynamic games, where a fraction of a second determines victory or defeat, such values make a huge difference. There's no question of a nervy "wait" until the image catches up with our commands. The S85F gives a sense of full control – and that's how it should be in equipment aspiring to be the perfect screen for gamers.

Aside from the previously mentioned issue with Dolby Vision, the input lag on the Dreame S100 is really very low. Values of around 5-6 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12-15 ms for 60 Hz are such excellent results that even a professional gamer won't be able to feel any delay during gameplay. The response to movements on the controller is almost instantaneous here.

Compatibility with PC

7.6/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
5ms
6ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RWGB
RGB
Max refresh rate
120Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

What about connecting to a computer? We’re quick to respond: the S85F excels in this role. The combination of lightning-fast input lag and a 120 Hz panel is the recipe for a great gaming experience on PC. Both fast-paced shooters and more leisurely RPG titles benefit from the rapid response and smooth animations, capable of captivating you for hours on end. Of course, it’s not perfect. We must mention the specific construction of the WOLED panel. It consists of four subpixels (WRGB), which is a different structure than the classic RGB found in monitors. As a result, if we sit very close to the screen, we might notice that fonts aren’t as perfectly sharp as we would like them to be. However, this is not a major issue and shouldn't be a bother in everyday use. Especially since the TV properly handles 4:4:4 chroma signal.

The Dreame S100 works well as a large gaming monitor. It has a 144 Hz refresh rate and easily supports G-Sync and FreeSync. However, problems arise when you want to use it for text work. Due to a software bug, the TV struggles with full colour sampling (Chroma 4:4:4) at 120 Hz and 144 Hz refresh rates, resulting in blurry fonts. To make the text perfectly sharp, you need to manually lower the refresh rate to 60 Hz in Windows. This is quite an annoying solution that forces constant jumping between settings if you want to use this screen for both work and gaming.

Viewing angles

7.5/10

6.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
29%
68%

As is typical for OLED technology, the viewing angles on the S85F are very good. The image maintains its properties even when viewed from the side, which is a clear advantage over most LCD televisions. However, we must note that it is not on the level known from QD-OLED panels. In the case of the tested WOLED panel, with considerable deviation from the screen axis, a slight drop in brightness and a subtle change in white shades can be observed. QD-OLED remains unmatched in this regard, offering nearly perfect picture quality no matter where we are looking at it from.

The viewing angles on the Dreame S100 are really good, thanks to the ADS panel. Unlike VA panels, this type of screen allows you to watch the image from a wide angle without noticeable loss of colour saturation and brightness. This comes at the expense of worse native contrast, but for most viewers (especially those with a wide couch) this will be quite a good compromise. There is a lack of Mini-LED TVs with good viewing angles at a reasonable price on the market today, so the S100 nicely fills this niche.

Daytime performance

5.3/10

6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

Dreame S100: 463 cd/m2

Samsung S85F (WOLED): 305 cd/m2

We must state clearly that working in a brightly lit room is not the strongest suit of the S85F. We are dealing with a moderately bright OLED panel here. Our measurements showed that the average brightness of the screen in "TV" mode hovers around 300 nits. For some users, this may be too low, especially in rooms with a lot of daylight. Of course, for moderately bright living rooms, this TV is perfect. However, it is not a model we would recommend for exceptionally bright, sun-drenched interiors. This issue is exacerbated by the anti-reflective coating used. We noted that it does not suppress reflections from the surroundings as well as the version with a QD-OLED panel, especially when direct sunlight hits the screen.

The Dreame S100 works well in most living rooms during the day. The television is equipped with a satin screen coating – while it may not perfectly eliminate reflections, it does a great job of preserving colour saturation, which doesn’t fade when the room is bright. In terms of pure brightness, the S100 has a moderately bright screen. It can reach about 600 nits peak in SDR format. This level allows it to be placed in typically sunlit rooms, although – let’s be honest – it’s not a brightness demon, and it may struggle a bit with direct, harsh sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-PTMFDEUC-0090-1110.7
RTMA.250416.179
Image processor
mt5889 3GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV Panel details
Review Dreame S100 TV Panel details

Samsung S85F (WOLED)

Dreame S100

TV features

7.3/10

5.9/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Good
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Samsung S85F (WOLED) TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    No
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Features of the Classic S85F TV

The S85F was not really designed with fans of traditional television in mind. You'll find no PiP function here (which is a bit surprising since Samsung usually offers it) nor the ability to record programmes to USB from built-in tuners. Fortunately, the basics are all here – teletext and a clear channel guide – so it's perfectly adequate for regular, everyday viewing. The included remote, although at first glance simple and lacking a numerical keypad, allows you to control multiple devices. This means that when you connect, for example, a Canal+ decoder, you won't need to have two remotes on the coffee table – the one for the TV will be entirely sufficient.

SmartTV S85F: Tizen

The smart portion is quite a different story. Tizen is one of the most advanced operating systems in televisions. It runs smoothly and supports all popular internet functions – from screen mirroring, through AirPlay, to voice search. The strongest point of Tizen is its integration with the SmartThings app, which can serve as a central hub for controlling the entire home. Of course, like any closed system, Tizen has its limitations – such as a smaller app library compared to GoogleTV. However, looking at the current list of available applications, it's hard to point out anything that could actually be missing.

Smart TV: Google TV

Dreame S100 uses the Google TV operating system. This is great news for anyone looking for a television with access to almost all streaming apps on the market. The system itself runs quite smoothly, although it does experience slight stutters now and then – which is par for the course in most Chinese TVs with Google software. On board, we find almost every necessary Smart TV feature, including screen mirroring and voice search using Google Assistant. Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 lacks support for AirPlay, making it difficult for iPhone users to easily share content from their phones.

Television Features

Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 is not a television designed for traditional TV viewers. Aside from basic options like connecting headphones and a rather simple remote control equipped with a numeric keypad, there are practically no additional features to facilitate the daily viewing of traditional channels. The only pleasant and increasingly rare addition is the presence of a physical minijack headphone output. This allows for connecting older wired headphones or analogue audio sets.

Apps

9.3/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the S85F performs excellently – practically everything you throw on a USB drive or hard drive will be played back without the slightest problem. Minor shortcomings only occur in the handling of some less popular photo formats, but for the vast majority of you, this will be more than sufficient. So it can confidently be said that for home use, the built-in player is more than solid.

The built-in media player works well and handled most files we provided from our USB drive without any issues. However, there were times when the app experienced slight stutters, and selected movies or photos only loaded after a few seconds. If the factory player turns out to be not very intuitive or lacks advanced features, the Google TV system saves the day. You just need to go to the app store and install any external media playback program (e.g. VLC) that will resolve this issue.

Sound

7.2/10

8.3/10

  • Maximum volume
    80dB
    84dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Built-in speakers with a power of 20 W on paper may not make a big impression, but in practice, the S85F can surprise. It sounds really nice, and at times you can even pick up a subtle bass, which is not a given in this class of speakers. The TV does not support the DTS format, which by 2025 unfortunately became a standard for most manufacturers. A pleasant surprise, however, is the support for Dolby Atmos. Of course, talking about “spatial” sound in the case of two speakers placed at the bottom of the housing would be a slight exaggeration, but it's good that Samsung offers such a feature in this model.

The sound quality of the Dreame S100 is one of the biggest advantages of this model – it's really good. The TV is equipped with a 4.1.2 speaker system with a total power of 70 W. The sound is clear, with a noticeably defined bass, which is confirmed by our acoustic measurements. The large drivers positioned on the sides of the casing effectively widen the soundstage. As a result, we get a noticeably more spacious sound compared to standard 20-watt 2.0 systems. The device supports Dolby Atmos encoding, so we can easily play spatial audio tracks from streaming platforms without the need to purchase an external soundbar. Unfortunately, it lacks support for the DTS format – that's a downside, although it must be honestly admitted that this standard is increasingly being abandoned by most manufacturers. On the plus side, the audio connection options are good. The Dreame S100 can be easily connected to newer home theatres or soundbars via the HDMI eARC port or optical output. A nice and increasingly rare addition is the classic minijack headphone socket, which allows older audio sets to gain a new life.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

84dBC (Max)

75dBC