Samsung QN990F vs Philips PUS7000

Direct comparison

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”98”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA (wide viewing angle)

Resolution: 7680x4320

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.6

5.3

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.7

    4.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.7

    5.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.6

    4.9

  • Gaming on console

    9.2

    6.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    7.9

    5.8

  • Watching in bright light

    5.2

    3.5

  • Utility functions

    7.5

    5.0

  • Apps

    9.3

    6.7

  • Sound quality

    7.9

    5.8

Advantages

  • Amazing Design

  • Wireless module Wiraless One Connect

  • Great black

  • High brightness

  • Matte display effectively reduces reflections

  • Good viewing angles

  • The fastest TV in the world - refresh rate 4K@240Hz and 8K@120Hz great for sports

  • Many features for gamers: HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, HGiG, Gamebar

  • Very fast and intuitive operating system Tizen OS

  • Attractive price

  • High contrast VA panel

  • Very low input lag

  • Gaming features – presence of VRR, ALLM, and a dedicated Game Bar

  • Supports HDR10+

  • Quite decent image processing (for such a cheap TV)

  • Good readability of fonts – suitable as a large monitor

  • Backlit remote with numeric keypad

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very high price

  • Local dimming algorithms could be better refined

  • Missing Dolby Vision and DTS:X

  • High input lag with wireless connection using Wiraless One Connect

  • Very low brightness – 200 nits

  • No Ambilight

  • Lack of any features to improve fluidity makes the image feel very "raw"

  • Titan OS system – the interface is slow, lacking many popular applications

  • The remote works on infrared

Our verdict

Samsung QN990F is a television that makes a huge impression from the very first moment. It's probably one of the most beautiful models on the market – ultra-slim, with an almost invisible frame and a stand that makes it look like the screen is levitating above the table. On top of that, there's the futuristic Wiraless One Connect module, this time in a wireless version, which helps to reduce the number of cables in the living room and gives the whole setup a modern character. But it doesn't stop at design. The QN990F also boasts a powerful specification. Mini-LED with over a thousand dimming zones can generate contrast that occasionally rivals that of OLEDs. "Additionally, there's very high HDR brightness and a new matte screen that effectively eliminates reflections. And when we add excellent motion smoothness with a refresh rate of up to 240 Hz in 4K, we have a set of features that truly impress. Samsung hasn't forgotten about gamers – we have Game Bar, VRR, ALLM, five HDMI 2.1 ports, and phenomenal input lag at the level of 10–15 ms (when connected via micro HDMI).

And this is where we get to the crux of the matter. Because while the QN990F impresses on paper and in many tests, in practice, some solutions still require fine-tuning. The wireless One Connect module raises input lag to unacceptable levels for gamers, Mini-LED can struggle in challenging scenes with a lot of detail, and the lack of Dolby Vision or DTS:X reminds us that Samsung is stubbornly following its own path, sometimes at the expense of the user. Despite this, the QN990F is a television that shows the direction of industry development. It's not a model for everyone – but for those who love gadgets, technological innovations, and want a screen in their living room that looks like it's from the future. However, if someone is looking solely for the best picture quality, they will even find models within Samsung's portfolio that perform significantly better – maybe without 8K, but with more refined contrast or colours. Because 8K still remains a technology that looks firmly towards the future and QN990F shows what televisions of tomorrow might look like. But are we – the viewers – ready to pay such a high price for this vision and accept the compromises that come with it?

If you're looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, the price is pretty much it. This model is primarily meant to be cheap, and it fulfills that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally upgrade to 4K without emptying the wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget 60 Hz" model, Philips hasn't forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which realistically improve the gaming experience when connected to a console and make everything quite responsive. But... indeed. The biggest problem with this TV is its brightness, or rather the lack thereof. 200 nits is a figure that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The picture will be pale and not very clear despite the fact that it features a high-contrast VA panel. HDR is essentially just a label on the box here. With such a dim panel, HDR materials look artificial and simply lack the necessary punch, so it's better to forget about them and stick to standard SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 doesn’t drastically stand out from the other budget screens. The question is whether you'll get along with the Titan OS system, which is still a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard with competitors. Given today's prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are churning out QLEDs and Mini-LEDs like there’s no tomorrow, the Philips PUS7000 faces a really tough battle. If you value the logo of a well-known brand and a low price: you can go ahead. However, if you’re looking for picture quality... it’s better to double-check your budget before making a purchase.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Super Premium
Average
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Silver
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand, One Connect Box
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.6/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 1344 (28 x 48)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

89,250:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

28,200:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

12,100:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,050:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

QN990F is the top representative of the Neo QLED series, so it had to feature Mini-LED technology. The 65-inch unit we tested received a VA panel and as many as 1344 local dimming zones, which looks really impressive on paper. In practice, this can provide a level of contrast that is close to ideal. In less demanding scenes, such as in the film Oblivion, the QN990F performed on par with OLED televisions – the blacks were practically infinite, and the picture looked stunning. However, it wasn't always so rosy. Or perhaps black and white? Like every Mini-LED, the QN990F has its limitations, and in more challenging sequences, it can leave mixed impressions. Where there is a vast amount of fine detail on the screen, the algorithms controlling the zones simply got confused. The contrast dropped, and a noticeable glow appeared around bright elements – the so-called halo effect. Additionally, in films recorded in a 21:9 (2.35:1) format, we noticed that the QN990F was unable to perfectly dim the pitch-black film bars, leaving a silver/blue haze on them. One could say that Samsung in this model prioritized the visibility of details over the perfect depth of black. On one hand, this yields very good results in several scenes, but on the other hand, in a television of this class, we expected the local dimming issue to be refined even further. The end result is simply "okay," and at this price point, we would expect something more than just a satisfactory outcome.

The model PUS7000 we tested, measuring 55 inches, is equipped with a VA panel. This is crucial for black quality, as in such budget constructions, we won't find local dimming systems that could assist the screen in dark scenes. Therefore, all the work relies on the panel itself, which, thanks to its characteristics, offers decent contrast at a level of 6000:1. In practice, this translates to significantly better experiences during evening viewings compared to competing TVs with IPS panels. The blacks here are better separated from bright elements, so dark parts of the image don’t appear washed out, and details in the shadows remain visible. However, it’s worth noting that with completely turned off lights, the black may slightly lean towards shades of navy blue and won't be as perfectly “pitch-black” as in more expensive models. To mitigate this effect and improve the perception of depth, it’s advisable to watch the TV with some light, additional illumination in the room. Usually, this problem was somewhat resolved by the well-known Ambilight system in Philips TVs, which optically increases contrast through the glow on the wall. Unfortunately, in the PUS7000 model, the manufacturer opted to seek savings, which is why we won’t find this lighting system here, which is standard in higher series like PUS8000.

HDR effect quality

6.6/10

3.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.1%, Bt.2020: 67.0%
DCI P3: 78.3%, Bt.2020: 57.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

802 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

689 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

1076 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

577 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

735 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

197 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

209 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PUS7000

Samsung QN990F

Samsung QN990F is one of the bright televisions, and this is immediately apparent in tests. In measurements, it achieved around 1300 nits, which in practice allows you to enjoy films as their creators intended. Bright scenes have the right strength, lights shine, and the impression is truly cinematic. In standard test patterns, sequences number 1, 3, and 5 performed the best – there, brightness remained around 800-1000 nits, and the image looked very natural. In more difficult segments, it could dip to around 600 nits, but the level was still sufficient for details to be clearly visible. However, it should be added that with such highly contrasted shots, the halo effect returns – the same one we mentioned regarding blacks. Bright elements can leave a glow on dark backgrounds, and this is immediately noticeable. As we are dealing with a QLED, the colour palette is expanded, and the colours present themselves impressively. The problem is that with such a flagship model, we expected better numbers. 91% coverage of DCI-P3 and about 67% BT.2020 are results that can be considered solid but not outstanding. This gives an image that is vibrant and appealing; however, the competition in this and lower price ranges can show even more.

Unfortunately, the PUS7000 is not suitable for watching HDR content. This screen is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is insufficient to display this format correctly. Even if a HDR signal message appears on the screen, the image will resemble a standard SDR recording. Therefore, it’s better to stick with the latter format to avoid errors in displaying bright scenes, as you will read below. The situation is worsened by the fact that this is a classic LCD model without additional layers that improve colours, such as QLED or PFS. As a result, colours in HDR may seem washed out. Ultimately, this provides a worse effect than in the standard SDR format, which is simply better suited to the capabilities of this panel.

Factory color reproduction

7/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the QN990F in Filmmaker mode, which is the best out-of-the-box setting available. Right from the start, we noticed a few significant issues. The biggest problem was with white balance. Due to too little blue, as well as incorrect ratios between red and blue, the image—especially in scenes with a lot of white—appeared too yellow, and at times even orange. On the Color Checker palette, these errors didn't look dramatic as they hovered around a value of 4, but in everyday viewing, especially with strong whites, they were most noticeable. We also noticed problems with brightness management—the TV struggled to maintain details in the smallest parts of the image, mainly due to how it manages backlight zones. Fortunately, Samsung provides plenty of room for adjustment when it comes to setting corrections. We know that with proper calibration, much more can be extracted from this screen.

We tested the television in movie mode, which theoretically should provide the best and most natural colours. And indeed, this mode is quite correct; however, when we connected the calibration equipment, its biggest flaw became apparent. The PUS7000 has significant shortcomings in displaying reds. Poorly tuned white balance and too low saturation of this colour cause the image to appear too cool. As a result, one might get the impression that the displayed content lacks vibrant colours. The situation is worsened by the fact that both SDR and HDR content are excessively brightened. This is confirmed by the gamma curve and EOTF graphs, which show that the television displays the image brighter than it should. This causes scenes to lose their depth and can make them seem slightly washed out. Fortunately, in the Philips menu, we find plenty of features to improve these aspects, so we immediately proceeded to calibration to see what we could extract from this screen.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.5/10

7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After carrying out the calibration, we managed to bring the white balance into order and eliminate the earlier shortcomings in shades of blue. As a result, the picture no longer looked like it had a slight yellowish filter – the whites are cleaner, and the whole thing presents itself much more naturally. We also managed to tame the brightness characteristic in HDR content to some extent. The television now handles maintaining detail in blacks much better and does not lose them as much as before. However, when we look at the EOTF curve and how the QN990F reproduces brightness in films, it is evident that it still tends to accentuate details in dark areas more strongly. This is a characteristic feature of Mini-LED technology and, more specifically, how it is managed by the QN990F, which is practically impossible to eliminate completely. Despite this, after calibration, the picture looks significantly more natural, mainly due to the correct exposure of white light. The final effect is definitely more pleasant to the eye and closer to what we expect from a flagship television.

After professional calibration, it’s evident that the PUS7000 responds well to image adjustments. In this price range, that’s not a given. The effects are best evaluated in two scenarios, depending on the content we plan to watch. SDR performs the best. After our adjustments, the image looks really good. Most colour errors have dropped below level 3, which is the threshold at which discrepancies usually become visible to the naked eye. Movies, series, sports, and regular television present naturally, without unpleasant deviations. If someone mainly watches classic channels or streams in HD quality, the difference after calibration will be noticeable straight away. However, it must be said clearly that the PUS7000 is still not a television suited for proper HDR, and calibration doesn't change much in this regard. The reason lies in the hardware: colours remain too unsaturated. The television lacks solutions that widen the colour gamut, such as PFS filters or a quantum dot layer, so the panel simply cannot display the intense colours required by HDR. This is most evident in reds, which still look washed out. This limitation cannot be circumvented through menu settings, as it stems from the design of the backlighting and the panel itself.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.2/10

6/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

In terms of tonal transition fluidity, the QN990F shows class. It is one of the best results we have seen so far. In most scenes, there is no question of visible colour banding or typical stair-stepping – the transitions are smooth and natural, and the image gives an impression of being incredibly coherent. Of course, as with practically every television, some issues with gradation can be observed in very dark shots. Banding can be noticeable there, but this is a typical phenomenon and should not affect the evaluation of the QN990F itself. Compared to the competition, it looks really very good, and the experience of viewing is simply excellent, and you can be sure that nothing will distract us from our sight.

When it comes to colour gradation in bright scenes, the PUS7000 model performs surprisingly well. It's hard to have any major complaints here. The colour transitions are natural and smooth, which means there are no disturbing bands or jumps between shades on a bright background. During the viewing of cheerful scenes, nothing should distract your attention from the screen. However, the situation changes dramatically when darker shades of grey or simply very dark colours appear on the screen. Unfortunately, quite strong "banding" of colours becomes noticeable then. Instead of smooth transitions, we get distinct breaks between the individual tones. In dark, atmospheric films, this can be quite annoying and detract from the viewing experience, as the tonal transitions are not as clean as in the bright areas of the image.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

6.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The QN990F deserves the highest praise for its upscaling capabilities. The processor responsible for 'lifting' classic TV to 8K resolution does a really decent job. Watching footage in 576p, we had no illusions that we would suddenly see a miraculous transformation like in an advertisement, where the image magically turns into crystal-clear 8K. Nevertheless, the final effect was surprisingly good; the picture looked clean and sharp. It's just a shame that the TV, like most Samsung models, has an overscan issue, which slightly cuts off the edges of the screen from the left side.

When it comes to image processing, Samsung offers a feature called "noise reduction," which in theory should improve tonal transitions in older materials, where they are usually more noticeable. Unfortunately, here we felt quite disappointed. The feature performs poorly – it struggles with unwanted banding and can even introduce its own artifacts. On the plus side, it’s worth noting that the TV doesn’t remove film grain when using this feature, but in practice, that’s a poor consolation when the noise reduction itself turns out to be practically useless.

The PUS7000 handles digital image processing quite well. The distortion reduction feature deserves praise, as it effectively smooths unwanted tonal transitions even at a low setting. However, it has its downside: with too aggressive operation, it can introduce undesirable artifacts on the screen. It would be a good idea to experiment with this setting to find the golden mean between a smooth image and the clarity of details.

The upscaling, or enhancing the quality of lower materials to 4K, is decent. The image after processing is very "soft," which is typical of almost all Philips TVs. The edges are plastic and smooth, making the image look cohesive. If someone finds it too soft, it can always be adjusted with the sharpness slider in the menu for a more pronounced effect.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.9/10

3.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
240Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
No
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
76%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (4K@240Hz):

Blur ():

QN990F can easily be called one of the fastest TVs in the world. In 4K mode, it can display images at a frequency of up to 240 Hz, which until now was more associated with gaming monitors than with living room TVs. However, in everyday viewing, what's more important is how it handles an 8K signal at 120 Hz – and it performs very well here too. Motion remains smooth, and the TV handles even the most demanding content without breaking a sweat. Additionally, there's the motion smoother, or "Image Clarity." Thanks to this, you can adjust the picture to your preferences – leave it slightly cinematic with a bit of judder or switch to maximum smoothness, which works brilliantly for things like sports broadcasts.

In this regard, we actually have no good news. It might seem that the biggest downside is the lack of a 120 Hz panel, but in this price range, that's actually the norm, and it's hard to expect more. However, the worst part is that the television has no motion smoothing features. There are no supporting systems in place for either movies or sports. We have to come to terms with the fact that the image on the PUS7000 is processed "raw." This means that during dynamic scenes or fast camera movements, motion can appear choppy or unclear. We have no option to enable any smoothers that could alleviate this effect.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

4.7/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 240Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

It has to be said straightforwardly – the QN990F is one of those televisions that scream they were designed with gamers in mind. Samsung has been developing its gaming solutions for years, but here we have a true package. Sure, it lacks Dolby Vision support in games, which is a downside that will always come up in discussions. However, aside from that, the list of features is truly impressive. To start, we have the Game Bar – a handy menu that allows you to quickly check and change game-related settings. You can see things like VRR enabled, frame rate, or aspect ratio settings there. It's like a little “dashboard” so you don’t have to dig deep into the menu to fix something. Since the word VRR was mentioned: yes, variable refresh rate is present here and works flawlessly. Plus, there's ALLM, which automatically switches the television to game mode as soon as the console is turned on. These may seem like small details, but together they make using the QN990F simply convenient and hassle-free.

However, the greatest impression comes from the number of ports. Four wireless HDMI 2.1 ports as standard is already great news, as there's no need to choose whether to connect the console, the receiver, or maybe even the PC. There's comfortably enough room for everything here. And if we add another micro HDMI (which we recommend connecting directly to the console), hidden within the casing, then in practice we have five inputs in full 2.1 standard. Let’s also add support for high refresh rates – 120 Hz in 8K or even 240 Hz in 4K – and we get a television that not only keeps up with the new consoles but also feels ready for consoles that aren’t even out yet.

Even though the PUS7000 isn’t marketed as a gaming TV, it doesn't perform as poorly in this category as one might expect. True, it doesn't support 120 Hz refresh rates, which is understandable at this price point, but the manufacturer has included several important features that significantly improve the console gaming experience. The most important of these are VRR and ALLM technologies. VRR is responsible for synchronising the screen with the number of frames generated by the console. This means the image doesn't "tear" and remains consistent even during sudden drops in frame rates while playing. On the other hand, ALLM is a solution that automatically switches the TV to a mode with the lowest latency immediately after detecting a signal from the console. All these parameters are easily accessible thanks to the Game Bar feature. This is a special control panel for gamers that can be brought up on the screen at any time. It allows for a quick view of current settings and connection status without interrupting gameplay, which is a very convenient solution.

Input lag

9.9/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
15 ms
12 ms
1080p120
9 ms
2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120
10 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
13 ms
2160p120
10 ms
4320p60
17 ms

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

If we look at the table with input lag results, the QN990F performs phenomenally – in the range of 10–15 ms, which is practically on par with gaming monitors. But there are a few "buts". First of all, the measurements taken using an additional micro HDMI, which Samsung cleverly hid in the TV's casing, show its full capabilities. At that point, the image reacts instantly and gaming is pure pleasure. The problem starts when we connect the console to the wireless One Connect module. Here, input lag spikes – the measuring device showed values higher by even 20 ms for the first 1–2 seconds, before the delays stabilised at around 40 ms. That's a level which is noticeable in faster games. Interestingly, the module was sitting nearby, at a distance of 2–3 metres, so the signal did not have any difficult conditions. It's not hard to imagine that if we hide it, for example, behind a couch at a distance of 6–10 metres, input lag could exceed even 100-150 ms. And those are values that are completely unacceptable for gaming.

Input lag measurements for Wireless One Connect from a distance of 2-3m are as follows:

SDR

Input lag

HDR

Input lag

1080p60

39 ms

1080p120

25 ms

2160p60

39 ms

2160p60

39 ms

2160p120

26 ms

2160p120

26 ms

4320p60

43 ms

4320p60

43 ms

Another plus for gamers is the very low input lag at around 12 ms. In this price range, the result is impressive. The delay is so minimal that the response to controller movements feels instantaneous, and in practice, it’s hard to notice at all. Gaming remains comfortable even in fast, dynamic titles where every millisecond counts. In this respect, the PUS7000 can keep up with much more expensive televisions.

Compatibility with PC

7.9/10

5.8/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Average
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
10ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
240Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

QN990F can impress when we connect a computer for gaming. The panel with a refresh rate of up to 240 Hz, support for G-Sync, and a really decent input lag make the TV function like a gigantic gaming monitor. For gaming, this setup is a dream come true, and the responsiveness here is at a level rarely seen in regular TVs.

Unfortunately, the situation is much worse for regular PC work. It’s a shame because the 8K resolution theoretically has huge potential - you can put even a 65-inch screen on your desk and sit close to the screen, taking advantage of the high pixel density. However, in practice, the magic fades. Despite proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4, which should guarantee sharp fonts, the readability on the QN990F is not perfect. The letters have slight edge issues, and prolonged work with text is simply not comfortable. It’s a shame, as gamers truly have a lot of room to play here, and the capabilities in games are excellent. However, this TV is not really suitable for everyday office work.

When it comes to connecting a computer, the possibilities for gaming are quite limited. The screen supports a maximum of 60 Hz and does not offer G-Sync technology, so it’s not equipment for demanding PC gamers. However, the PUS7000 surprisingly performs well for text work. The readability of fonts is at a very high level. The television correctly handles 4:4:4 chroma subsampling. This means that each letter, regardless of its size or colour, is displayed sharply and without any distortion on the edges. As a result, office work or browsing the internet on this screen is simply comfortable and doesn’t strain the eyes like some cheap panels that struggle with clean font rendering.

Viewing angles

6.5/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
57%
70%

Samsung has applied a viewing angle enhancing coating in the QN990F and it actually works. We feel that this year it performs a bit worse than last year's models, but the effect is still impressive. For a VA panel, the viewing angles are really very good – to the point that they can be compared to what IPS panel TVs offer. This means that even when viewing from the side, we do not lose clarity or colour.

The viewing angles on this model are weak, which is directly due to the use of a VA-type panel. Although this panel provides decent contrast, as I mentioned earlier, it has one major flaw: it requires you to sit directly in front of the screen. Just shifting slightly to the side is enough for the colours to start losing saturation, and the image becomes noticeably worse.

Daytime performance

5.2/10

3.5/10

Panel finish
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Average
Good

Panel brightness

Philips PUS7000: 202 cd/m2

Samsung QN990F: 363 cd/m2

One of the biggest innovations in this year's Neo QLED 8K TVs is the matte displays. Yes, you read that right – Samsung has implemented a matte finish in its flagship model, and we have to admit that the effect is truly impressive. Reflections practically vanish, the screen doesn’t turn into a mirror, and watching in a bright living room suddenly becomes much more enjoyable. Of course, every rose has its thorns. The matte finish means that black looks a bit washed out during the day, and colours lose some of their vibrancy. It’s a compromise – either we battle reflections, or we maintain maximum depth of colours.

As for brightness, the QN990F is not a record-breaker. In TV mode, it reaches around 370–400 nits, which is acceptable for everyday TV viewing, but in very bright, sunlit rooms, it may prove insufficient to completely "break through" the light coming into the room.

In a sunny room, the PUS7000 performs poorly. This is due to the fact that the display is simply too dim. A brightness level of 200 nits is very low, which does not allow for comfortable viewing in a lot of daylight. On the plus side, the satin screen coating does a decent job of reducing reflections. Thanks to this, reflections are not overly noticeable on the display, but it's not enough to save the situation. The brightness of this model is too low to cut through strong sunlight, so in very bright rooms, the image will simply be quite unclear.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
White LED
Software version during testing
T-RSPFDEUC-0090-1050.6 E2500007, BT-S
TPN256E_V056.002.236.141
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QN990F TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details
Review Samsung QN990F TV Panel details
Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details

Samsung QN990F

Philips PUS7000

TV features

7.5/10

5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features

Classic Features and Connections

Even though the QN990F looks like a television from the future, if someone just wants to watch regular TV – it's possible to do so quite comfortably. Onboard, we have several practical additions, such as PiP, which allows viewing two sources simultaneously. There's no point even mentioning Bluetooth, as it's already standard. However, special attention should be given to the whole concept of wireless operation. The One Connect module can be placed in a different location than the television itself, which is a significant convenience for those who frequently switch devices. Of course, it still needs to be plugged in, so it’s not completely cable-free, but it’s hard not to see it as a display of Samsung's capabilities – a taste of what televisions of the future may look like.

Smart TV System: Tizen

As for the operating system, Samsung has opted for its proprietary Tizen, which, despite being a closed ecosystem, operates incredibly smoothly. It's one of the fastest, if not the fastest operating systems in televisions, and very intuitive at that. All classic smart features are in place: AirPlay, screen mirroring, voice search in multiple languages, and quick access to the most important streaming applications. There may be a few niche programmes missing, but the vast majority of users will find everything they need here.

Titan OS System

Titan OS is still a fairly new operating system, and unfortunately, this is noticeable in everyday use. The whole system operates sluggishly, at times even clumsily. The response to commands from the remote is slow, which is further complicated by the fact that the device uses infrared connectivity instead of Bluetooth / RF. This means we need to aim the remote fairly precisely at the television for the system to respond at all. During testing, we again failed to launch the screen mirroring feature with computers running Windows. Fortunately, transmitting video from Apple devices via AirPlay worked without any issues. Another downside of Titan OS is its very modest app library. The selection is much smaller than in systems like webOS or Tizen, not to mention Google TV, where the choice of programs is almost unlimited.

Classic Features

On the other hand, the PUS7000 might be a good choice for people who primarily watch traditional television. Here, we find a properly functioning teletext and a clear EPG interface, which is an electronic program guide. The remote included is backlit, which makes it very handy to use after dark, and it features standard numeric buttons for quick channel selection. An interesting addition is the presence of a classic jack headphone input. This is a rarely seen feature in new televisions, allowing for the connection of older home theatre systems or wired headphones without the need to purchase adapters.

Apps

9.3/10

6.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

QN990F handles playback of files from USB practically without a hitch. Movies, music, photos – most popular formats work without the slightest issues and there's no need to fiddle with additional players or devices. Only with rarely encountered photo formats may limitations arise. It’s a pity that despite the manufacturer's claims, there is a lack of proper support for HEIC files. The TV detects them in the media browser, but in practice, it can't open them.

The built-in media player works quite well and handles most popular video formats without any major issues. The television easily reads subtitles from files and manages various audio formats, so those who keep movies on a drive or USB shouldn't feel restricted. The only hitch concerns the photo browser – not everything worked properly, and some files, especially in selected resolutions, did not open at all.

Sound

7.9/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

QN990F can really play nicely. For such a slim design, the sound is surprisingly clear and detailed, so one can be satisfied for everyday movie watching or gaming. Unfortunately, as is often the case with Samsung's ultra-thin TVs, there’s a lack of bass – and you notice it straight away. Action scenes or more intense effects don't have the depth that a decent soundbar or home theatre system would provide. On the positive side, it does support Dolby Atmos. This is currently the most popular surround sound codec in films and gives a much greater sense of immersion in the action. Unfortunately, as always with Samsung, there is a lack of support for DTS:X. This format is indeed appearing less frequently in new productions, but it is still valued by fans of physical Blu-ray media.

The sound is pretty much at a budget level. It's sufficient for news and talk shows, but with films and music, it quickly lacks depth and bass. At this price, it's hard to expect much more, so if we’re after better experiences, it’s worth considering a soundbar or connecting external audio, even just through the headphone jack.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC