Samsung QN990F vs Philips OLED950

Direct comparison

OLED950 / OLED+

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”98”

Available screen sizes: 65”77”

Panel type: LCD VA (wide viewing angle)

Resolution: 7680x4320

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.6

8.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.7

    8.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.7

    8.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.6

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    9.2

    9.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    7.9

    6.5

  • Watching in bright light

    5.2

    7.3

  • Utility functions

    7.5

    6.5

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.9

    8.2

Advantages

  • Amazing Design

  • Wireless module Wiraless One Connect

  • Great black

  • High brightness

  • Matte display effectively reduces reflections

  • Good viewing angles

  • The fastest TV in the world - refresh rate 4K@240Hz and 8K@120Hz great for sports

  • Many features for gamers: HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, HGiG, Gamebar

  • Very fast and intuitive operating system Tizen OS

  • Amazing peak brightness, exceeding 2000 nits on test panels (Tandem OLED matrix)

  • Perfect black and infinite contrast

  • Support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Excellent gaming features: supports 4K@120Hz, VRR, ALLM, and 144 Hz mode

  • Very low input lag

  • Impressive, 4-sided Ambilight system

  • Google TV system offering access to a vast library of apps

  • Backlit remote, charging via USB-C connector

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very high price

  • Local dimming algorithms could be better refined

  • Missing Dolby Vision and DTS:X

  • High input lag with wireless connection using Wiraless One Connect

  • Only two HDMI ports in standard 2.1

  • Remote control communicating via infrared (requires aiming at the receiver)

  • Very high price compared to market competition

  • Sound quality noticeably weaker than in the lower model OLED910

  • Slight issues with posterisation

Our verdict

Samsung QN990F is a television that makes a huge impression from the very first moment. It's probably one of the most beautiful models on the market – ultra-slim, with an almost invisible frame and a stand that makes it look like the screen is levitating above the table. On top of that, there's the futuristic Wiraless One Connect module, this time in a wireless version, which helps to reduce the number of cables in the living room and gives the whole setup a modern character. But it doesn't stop at design. The QN990F also boasts a powerful specification. Mini-LED with over a thousand dimming zones can generate contrast that occasionally rivals that of OLEDs. "Additionally, there's very high HDR brightness and a new matte screen that effectively eliminates reflections. And when we add excellent motion smoothness with a refresh rate of up to 240 Hz in 4K, we have a set of features that truly impress. Samsung hasn't forgotten about gamers – we have Game Bar, VRR, ALLM, five HDMI 2.1 ports, and phenomenal input lag at the level of 10–15 ms (when connected via micro HDMI).

And this is where we get to the crux of the matter. Because while the QN990F impresses on paper and in many tests, in practice, some solutions still require fine-tuning. The wireless One Connect module raises input lag to unacceptable levels for gamers, Mini-LED can struggle in challenging scenes with a lot of detail, and the lack of Dolby Vision or DTS:X reminds us that Samsung is stubbornly following its own path, sometimes at the expense of the user. Despite this, the QN990F is a television that shows the direction of industry development. It's not a model for everyone – but for those who love gadgets, technological innovations, and want a screen in their living room that looks like it's from the future. However, if someone is looking solely for the best picture quality, they will even find models within Samsung's portfolio that perform significantly better – maybe without 8K, but with more refined contrast or colours. Because 8K still remains a technology that looks firmly towards the future and QN990F shows what televisions of tomorrow might look like. But are we – the viewers – ready to pay such a high price for this vision and accept the compromises that come with it?

Philips OLED950 is undoubtedly a technological showcase that redefines many aspects of what we can expect from a home entertainment centre. The use of the groundbreaking Tandem OLED panel brings us to the absolute peak in terms of image quality. The combination of infinite black and perfect contrast with brightness that can exceed the magical barrier of 2000 nits in HDR mode produces effects that are, at times, breathtaking. Whether we’re watching movies in a sunlit lounge or gaming at night with the support of a four-sided Ambilight system, the experience is simply phenomenal. It’s a complete screen that will satisfy both the cinema enthusiast seeking fidelity in Dolby Vision, and the gamer demanding 144 Hz and perfect motion response.

However, this awe for the raw performance of the panel is mixed with a sense of inadequacy when we consider the manufacturer's promises regarding image processing. Philips has heavily promoted the use of the "dual" P5 processor, suggesting that it would be a remedy for all the woes of digital signal processing. However, reality proved to be less revolutionary. In our tests, the difference compared to models equipped with the standard, single P5 chip was nearly imperceptible in everyday use. Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions and posterization in difficult scenes, although rare, still occur. Considering the astronomical price of this model, we expected a significantly greater qualitative leap in this aspect that would justify such high positioning of the equipment. The question of value for money becomes the biggest problem for this otherwise outstanding television. When we look at the market with a cool eye, the situation for the 950 model becomes complicated. It’s not just about the strong competition from cheaper flagships like the LG G5 or Samsung S95F, but also about the "fratricidal" battle within Philips' own offerings. It turns out that the lower positioned OLED910 model offers us practically the same, brilliant image generated by the identical panel. Moreover, the 910 model outshines in audio, offering an integrated soundbar from Bowers & Wilkins, which is simply missing in the more expensive 950 model due to a different design. We are thus faced with a paradox: we get the same image and inferior sound, but we have to pay significantly more. Therefore, although the OLED950 is a fantastic screen, in 2025 the title of "Best Philips Television" and our recommendation goes to the model OLED910.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Super Premium
Premium
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Silver
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand, One Connect Box
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.6/10

10/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 1344 (28 x 48)

Contrast:

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

89,250:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

28,200:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

12,100:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,050:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

QN990F is the top representative of the Neo QLED series, so it had to feature Mini-LED technology. The 65-inch unit we tested received a VA panel and as many as 1344 local dimming zones, which looks really impressive on paper. In practice, this can provide a level of contrast that is close to ideal. In less demanding scenes, such as in the film Oblivion, the QN990F performed on par with OLED televisions – the blacks were practically infinite, and the picture looked stunning. However, it wasn't always so rosy. Or perhaps black and white? Like every Mini-LED, the QN990F has its limitations, and in more challenging sequences, it can leave mixed impressions. Where there is a vast amount of fine detail on the screen, the algorithms controlling the zones simply got confused. The contrast dropped, and a noticeable glow appeared around bright elements – the so-called halo effect. Additionally, in films recorded in a 21:9 (2.35:1) format, we noticed that the QN990F was unable to perfectly dim the pitch-black film bars, leaving a silver/blue haze on them. One could say that Samsung in this model prioritized the visibility of details over the perfect depth of black. On one hand, this yields very good results in several scenes, but on the other hand, in a television of this class, we expected the local dimming issue to be refined even further. The end result is simply "okay," and at this price point, we would expect something more than just a satisfactory outcome.

There’s no need to elaborate here. Like every OLED TV, the Philips OLED950 has perfect black levels and contrast. Regardless of the film scene being watched, whether it's night shots or materials in a 2.39:1 aspect ratio with black bars, you can count on flawless black without any blooming or brightening. This is one of the biggest advantages of OLED technology over LCD and Mini-LED TVs. There are no local dimming algorithm games or compromises here. Black always remains black. The only thing that can be noticed in our tests is the scene with the helicopter from Sicario 2. The OLED950 quite clearly accentuates details in the shadows. However, this is a feature of our test unit, more related to the character of the image reproduction than the quality of black itself. In this regard, everything here is at the highest level.

HDR effect quality

6.6/10

8.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.1%, Bt.2020: 67.0%
DCI P3: 99.7%, Bt.2020: 82.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

802 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

689 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

1076 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

577 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

735 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1910 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2084 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2194 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2179 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1370 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED950

Samsung QN990F

Luminance of RGB colors

Samsung QN990F is one of the bright televisions, and this is immediately apparent in tests. In measurements, it achieved around 1300 nits, which in practice allows you to enjoy films as their creators intended. Bright scenes have the right strength, lights shine, and the impression is truly cinematic. In standard test patterns, sequences number 1, 3, and 5 performed the best – there, brightness remained around 800-1000 nits, and the image looked very natural. In more difficult segments, it could dip to around 600 nits, but the level was still sufficient for details to be clearly visible. However, it should be added that with such highly contrasted shots, the halo effect returns – the same one we mentioned regarding blacks. Bright elements can leave a glow on dark backgrounds, and this is immediately noticeable. As we are dealing with a QLED, the colour palette is expanded, and the colours present themselves impressively. The problem is that with such a flagship model, we expected better numbers. 91% coverage of DCI-P3 and about 67% BT.2020 are results that can be considered solid but not outstanding. This gives an image that is vibrant and appealing; however, the competition in this and lower price ranges can show even more.

OLED950 is a phenomenal TV for consuming content in HDR format, primarily thanks to the use of innovative Tandem OLED technology. With this technology, the screen can generate astronomical brightness levels, reaching over 2000 nits in movie scenes (on test patterns). This is an outstanding result that places the OLED950 model among the elite displays available on the market. However, it is worth noting a specific aspect of this solution – at moments when full-screen flashes of light appear, brightness can drop by as much as half. Nonetheless, it is important to highlight that levels above 1000 nits on a full screen are still an outstanding result. This allows HDR content to be displayed exactly as filmmakers intended, maintaining the dynamics and impact of bright scenes.

The use of Tandem OLED technology also brought tangible benefits in terms of colour reproduction, improving elements that traditional WOLED panels had issues with compared to QD-OLED competition. In the case of the OLED950, the colour gamut coverage is wider than in classic WOLED panels, reaching nearly 100% of the DCI-P3 colour space and a solid 82% of the demanding BT.2020 palette. While these results still do not match the highly refined achievements of QD-OLED panels, the difference becomes less noticeable during real-world use. We cannot deny that in the vast majority of films, colours look simply fantastic on this model – they are saturated, vibrant, and full of depth.

Factory color reproduction

7/10

5.5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the QN990F in Filmmaker mode, which is the best out-of-the-box setting available. Right from the start, we noticed a few significant issues. The biggest problem was with white balance. Due to too little blue, as well as incorrect ratios between red and blue, the image—especially in scenes with a lot of white—appeared too yellow, and at times even orange. On the Color Checker palette, these errors didn't look dramatic as they hovered around a value of 4, but in everyday viewing, especially with strong whites, they were most noticeable. We also noticed problems with brightness management—the TV struggled to maintain details in the smallest parts of the image, mainly due to how it manages backlight zones. Fortunately, Samsung provides plenty of room for adjustment when it comes to setting corrections. We know that with proper calibration, much more can be extracted from this screen.

We tested the OLED950 model in Film mode. Although it is intended to be the best and most accurate preset on this television, in practice, it proved to be not without flaws. Interestingly, in the specimen we tested, the biggest challenge was not the white balance itself – although it did show a slight tendency to give the image a pinkish tint. The main issue lay in the way the television managed brightness, both in everyday SDR content and in demanding HDR scenes. Analysis of the gamma chart and the EOTF curve leads to one key conclusion: the television excessively exposes brightness in the lower registers. This results in the image appearing less contrasty than what the panel technology allows. Details in dark areas, which should remain perfectly dimmed (the characteristic "OLED black"), are simply unnecessarily highlighted and brightened. Fortunately, these errors can be corrected using the appropriate tools, so – as always – we proceeded with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.5/10

9.4/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After carrying out the calibration, we managed to bring the white balance into order and eliminate the earlier shortcomings in shades of blue. As a result, the picture no longer looked like it had a slight yellowish filter – the whites are cleaner, and the whole thing presents itself much more naturally. We also managed to tame the brightness characteristic in HDR content to some extent. The television now handles maintaining detail in blacks much better and does not lose them as much as before. However, when we look at the EOTF curve and how the QN990F reproduces brightness in films, it is evident that it still tends to accentuate details in dark areas more strongly. This is a characteristic feature of Mini-LED technology and, more specifically, how it is managed by the QN990F, which is practically impossible to eliminate completely. Despite this, after calibration, the picture looks significantly more natural, mainly due to the correct exposure of white light. The final effect is definitely more pleasant to the eye and closer to what we expect from a flagship television.

As you can see, the OLED950, after a professional calibration process, becomes an absolutely phenomenal display that, without a shadow of a doubt, can be placed alongside the best televisions currently available in the world. This equipment needed only a professional touch to showcase its full potential and eliminate factory shortcomings. The residual errors in the Color Checker tests and the fidelity of the colour palette speak for themselves. We are dealing with an almost perfect device here. A true window to the world, offering image quality of the highest order.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.2/10

7.1/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

In terms of tonal transition fluidity, the QN990F shows class. It is one of the best results we have seen so far. In most scenes, there is no question of visible colour banding or typical stair-stepping – the transitions are smooth and natural, and the image gives an impression of being incredibly coherent. Of course, as with practically every television, some issues with gradation can be observed in very dark shots. Banding can be noticeable there, but this is a typical phenomenon and should not affect the evaluation of the QN990F itself. Compared to the competition, it looks really very good, and the experience of viewing is simply excellent, and you can be sure that nothing will distract us from our sight.

If we had to point out the weaker point of the OLED950 model compared to market competitors like the G5 and S95F, it would be – as with most TVs from this manufacturer – the digital signal processing. Although the processor used here is referred to as a "dual" one, our tests in practice did not show significant changes compared to the lower positioned OLED910 model. The differences are actually minimal, which only reflected in a slight cosmetic increase in rating in this category. In very demanding, especially dark scenes, one can still occasionally notice issues with slight posterization. However, it should be clearly stated that this is a "flaw" that the average viewer will very rarely notice during normal usage, and the overall reception remains at a high level.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

7.1/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The QN990F deserves the highest praise for its upscaling capabilities. The processor responsible for 'lifting' classic TV to 8K resolution does a really decent job. Watching footage in 576p, we had no illusions that we would suddenly see a miraculous transformation like in an advertisement, where the image magically turns into crystal-clear 8K. Nevertheless, the final effect was surprisingly good; the picture looked clean and sharp. It's just a shame that the TV, like most Samsung models, has an overscan issue, which slightly cuts off the edges of the screen from the left side.

When it comes to image processing, Samsung offers a feature called "noise reduction," which in theory should improve tonal transitions in older materials, where they are usually more noticeable. Unfortunately, here we felt quite disappointed. The feature performs poorly – it struggles with unwanted banding and can even introduce its own artifacts. On the plus side, it’s worth noting that the TV doesn’t remove film grain when using this feature, but in practice, that’s a poor consolation when the noise reduction itself turns out to be practically useless.

Upscaling

In terms of the scaling of the image, the proprietary P5 processor performs just as well as in most of the manufacturer's models. Lower resolution content gains a very soft and plastic character. This presentation will certainly appeal to many people. However, if you prefer sharper contours, you can gently enhance them using the appropriate slider in the TV menu. In this aspect, it's really hard to nitpick. The image simply looks very good and additionally, there are no issues with overscan.

Smoothing and Distortion Reduction

The smoothing of tonal transitions performs somewhat worse. In the settings, we find an option called "Distortion Reduction." This allows for a three-level adjustment of the processor's intervention. Unfortunately, the Minimum setting works poorly and the smoothing effects are minimal. The Medium level gives a decent result, but it also begins to smooth out the details of the actors' skin. On the other hand, the Maximum setting works too aggressively. It removes far too many details from the face and background elements or can even eliminate film grain. To achieve the optimal effect, it's worth playing around with these settings at home and adjusting them to your liking. It might seem that the Medium option represents the best compromise here.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.9/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
240Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
76%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur (4K@240Hz):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

QN990F can easily be called one of the fastest TVs in the world. In 4K mode, it can display images at a frequency of up to 240 Hz, which until now was more associated with gaming monitors than with living room TVs. However, in everyday viewing, what's more important is how it handles an 8K signal at 120 Hz – and it performs very well here too. Motion remains smooth, and the TV handles even the most demanding content without breaking a sweat. Additionally, there's the motion smoother, or "Image Clarity." Thanks to this, you can adjust the picture to your preferences – leave it slightly cinematic with a bit of judder or switch to maximum smoothness, which works brilliantly for things like sports broadcasts.

The motion reproduction on the OLED950 model is simply perfect. This is typical for screens of this kind (OLED 120Hz+), as the panel shows no motion blur at all. This allows us to enjoy perfect sharpness in practically any conditions. A significant part of this is due not only to the nature of organic technology itself. Equally important work is done here by the smoothing systems employed by the manufacturer.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 240Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

It has to be said straightforwardly – the QN990F is one of those televisions that scream they were designed with gamers in mind. Samsung has been developing its gaming solutions for years, but here we have a true package. Sure, it lacks Dolby Vision support in games, which is a downside that will always come up in discussions. However, aside from that, the list of features is truly impressive. To start, we have the Game Bar – a handy menu that allows you to quickly check and change game-related settings. You can see things like VRR enabled, frame rate, or aspect ratio settings there. It's like a little “dashboard” so you don’t have to dig deep into the menu to fix something. Since the word VRR was mentioned: yes, variable refresh rate is present here and works flawlessly. Plus, there's ALLM, which automatically switches the television to game mode as soon as the console is turned on. These may seem like small details, but together they make using the QN990F simply convenient and hassle-free.

However, the greatest impression comes from the number of ports. Four wireless HDMI 2.1 ports as standard is already great news, as there's no need to choose whether to connect the console, the receiver, or maybe even the PC. There's comfortably enough room for everything here. And if we add another micro HDMI (which we recommend connecting directly to the console), hidden within the casing, then in practice we have five inputs in full 2.1 standard. Let’s also add support for high refresh rates – 120 Hz in 8K or even 240 Hz in 4K – and we get a television that not only keeps up with the new consoles but also feels ready for consoles that aren’t even out yet.

OLED950 is almost the perfect television for gamers. This is due not only to the unique atmosphere created by the Ambilight system during gameplay. The most important aspect here is the solid hardware support. We literally have everything you would expect from a modern gaming display. The manufacturer has implemented two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s. This gives us access to gaming in 4K resolution at 120 frames per second. There is, of course, support for VRR technology and the automatic game mode ALLM. The device handles any HDR signal with ease, whether we’re using Dolby Vision or the HGiG standard.

We have access to all settings from one place thanks to the special Game Bar overlay. While this interface may not be the most graphically attractive on the market, it fully accomplishes its task. It displays all the important signal parameters and offers useful additions. Gamers can take advantage of the minimap zoom function or add a fixed crosshair on the screen, which can be seen as a small aid in online competition. The adjustment of contrast range also proves to be useful. It allows you to brighten shadows and achieve better visibility of enemies hiding in dark corners of the map.

Input lag

9.9/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
15 ms
12 ms
1080p120
9 ms
5 ms
2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120
10 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120
10 ms
5 ms
4320p60
17 ms

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
12 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

If we look at the table with input lag results, the QN990F performs phenomenally – in the range of 10–15 ms, which is practically on par with gaming monitors. But there are a few "buts". First of all, the measurements taken using an additional micro HDMI, which Samsung cleverly hid in the TV's casing, show its full capabilities. At that point, the image reacts instantly and gaming is pure pleasure. The problem starts when we connect the console to the wireless One Connect module. Here, input lag spikes – the measuring device showed values higher by even 20 ms for the first 1–2 seconds, before the delays stabilised at around 40 ms. That's a level which is noticeable in faster games. Interestingly, the module was sitting nearby, at a distance of 2–3 metres, so the signal did not have any difficult conditions. It's not hard to imagine that if we hide it, for example, behind a couch at a distance of 6–10 metres, input lag could exceed even 100-150 ms. And those are values that are completely unacceptable for gaming.

Input lag measurements for Wireless One Connect from a distance of 2-3m are as follows:

SDR

Input lag

HDR

Input lag

1080p60

39 ms

1080p120

25 ms

2160p60

39 ms

2160p60

39 ms

2160p120

26 ms

2160p120

26 ms

4320p60

43 ms

4320p60

43 ms

According to what we have come to expect from TVs in this segment, the signal delay in this model is practically negligible. Our measurements indicated nearly reference values: just 5 ms at 120 Hz refresh rate and 12 ms for the 60 Hz signal. This means an instantaneous response to every command issued via the controller, mouse, or keyboard. With such low results, the only limitation during dynamic online gameplay remains your own reflexes and lack of "skill," rather than the hardware. 😉

Compatibility with PC

7.9/10

6.5/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Average
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
10ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BWRG
Max refresh rate
240Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

QN990F can impress when we connect a computer for gaming. The panel with a refresh rate of up to 240 Hz, support for G-Sync, and a really decent input lag make the TV function like a gigantic gaming monitor. For gaming, this setup is a dream come true, and the responsiveness here is at a level rarely seen in regular TVs.

Unfortunately, the situation is much worse for regular PC work. It’s a shame because the 8K resolution theoretically has huge potential - you can put even a 65-inch screen on your desk and sit close to the screen, taking advantage of the high pixel density. However, in practice, the magic fades. Despite proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4, which should guarantee sharp fonts, the readability on the QN990F is not perfect. The letters have slight edge issues, and prolonged work with text is simply not comfortable. It’s a shame, as gamers truly have a lot of room to play here, and the capabilities in games are excellent. However, this TV is not really suitable for everyday office work.

In this category, the situation looks quite specific. If we look at the OLED950 through the eyes of a gamer, we get a phenomenal display. It performs excellently not only with consoles but also when connected to a powerful computer. We have access here to an additional 144 Hz mode, full support for G-Sync and FreeSync technology, and very low signal latency. One could risk saying that for PC gamers, this is an almost ideal monitor.

However, problems arise when we examine the readability of fonts. We are not only referring to the unusual subpixel arrangement of the WOLED panels (BWRG), which causes specific edge discoloration of text in all televisions of this type. The tested model struggles with correctly displaying Chroma 4:4:4 sampling. This is mainly noticeable when we display coloured text on another colourful background. The letters then gain strange shading, unnatural contours, and unwanted artifacts. It’s a bit of a shame, although we must honestly admit that this is a very specific flaw. For 99% of you, no one is likely to notice this during normal entertainment. However, if you belong to that 1% of people planning to purchase the OLED950 strictly as a monitor for office work, you may feel disappointed.

Viewing angles

6.5/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
57%
29%

Samsung has applied a viewing angle enhancing coating in the QN990F and it actually works. We feel that this year it performs a bit worse than last year's models, but the effect is still impressive. For a VA panel, the viewing angles are really very good – to the point that they can be compared to what IPS panel TVs offer. This means that even when viewing from the side, we do not lose clarity or colour.

As befits organic technology, the viewing angles here are practically very good. We can enjoy a great image no matter where on the couch we look at the screen. The only caveat arises when directly comparing the Tandem OLED matrix used here with the competitors' solutions. Compared to last year's LG panels equipped with the MLA filter or the best QD-OLED screens from Samsung, the angles in the OLED950 are slightly weaker. They are not quite as perfect as those of the mentioned rivals. Nevertheless, they generally still maintain a very high level, and in everyday use, it’s hard to consider this a downside.

Daytime performance

5.2/10

7.3/10

Panel finish
Matte
Glare
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Average
Very Good

Panel brightness

Philips OLED950: 615 cd/m2

Samsung QN990F: 363 cd/m2

One of the biggest innovations in this year's Neo QLED 8K TVs is the matte displays. Yes, you read that right – Samsung has implemented a matte finish in its flagship model, and we have to admit that the effect is truly impressive. Reflections practically vanish, the screen doesn’t turn into a mirror, and watching in a bright living room suddenly becomes much more enjoyable. Of course, every rose has its thorns. The matte finish means that black looks a bit washed out during the day, and colours lose some of their vibrancy. It’s a compromise – either we battle reflections, or we maintain maximum depth of colours.

As for brightness, the QN990F is not a record-breaker. In TV mode, it reaches around 370–400 nits, which is acceptable for everyday TV viewing, but in very bright, sunlit rooms, it may prove insufficient to completely "break through" the light coming into the room.

The OLED950 model performs exceptionally well in really bright rooms without any concerns. A key advantage here is the previously mentioned very high brightness of the panel. Considering it's OLED technology, the performance is impressive. One could confidently say that in this regard, this television can compete with mid-range Mini-LED models. In the world of organic panels, this is not such a given, which is a significant plus for the device being tested.

However, there is one drawback that could be termed as its Achilles' heel. Similar to most Tandem OLED panels, the manufacturer has applied a glossy screen coating here. Unfortunately, it doesn't handle direct light reflections very well. It's worth bearing this in mind when planning the placement of the television in relation to windows, as reflections may be noticeable.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Software version during testing
T-RSPFDEUC-0090-1050.6 E2500007, BT-S
Image processor
MT5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QN990F TV Panel details
Review Philips OLED950 TV Panel details

TV features

7.5/10

6.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Samsung QN990F TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features

Classic Features and Connections

Even though the QN990F looks like a television from the future, if someone just wants to watch regular TV – it's possible to do so quite comfortably. Onboard, we have several practical additions, such as PiP, which allows viewing two sources simultaneously. There's no point even mentioning Bluetooth, as it's already standard. However, special attention should be given to the whole concept of wireless operation. The One Connect module can be placed in a different location than the television itself, which is a significant convenience for those who frequently switch devices. Of course, it still needs to be plugged in, so it’s not completely cable-free, but it’s hard not to see it as a display of Samsung's capabilities – a taste of what televisions of the future may look like.

Smart TV System: Tizen

As for the operating system, Samsung has opted for its proprietary Tizen, which, despite being a closed ecosystem, operates incredibly smoothly. It's one of the fastest, if not the fastest operating systems in televisions, and very intuitive at that. All classic smart features are in place: AirPlay, screen mirroring, voice search in multiple languages, and quick access to the most important streaming applications. There may be a few niche programmes missing, but the vast majority of users will find everything they need here.

Smart Features

The biggest plus of the OLED950 is the Google TV system — the manufacturer is increasingly moving away from it in cheaper models in favour of TitanOS, but here we thankfully still have a fully-fledged Android-based environment. This means access to a vast library of apps, a voice assistant, and convenient features like Chromecast. For unknown reasons, we were once again unable to activate Windows Miracast in the editorial office, despite the manufacturer declaring this option is available. On the plus side: Apple device users can sleep easy, as the TV supports AirPlay.

Classic Features

In terms of “classics,” the TV offers a rather basic set: teletext and Bluetooth connectivity. The biggest complaints revolve around the remote. On one hand, it is sensibly designed with backlighting, “hybrid” switching between typical functions and the numeric keypad, and charging via USB-C. On the other hand, enthusiasm quickly wanes when it turns out that you need to aim it at the screen, as it operates on infrared.

Apps

9.3/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

QN990F handles playback of files from USB practically without a hitch. Movies, music, photos – most popular formats work without the slightest issues and there's no need to fiddle with additional players or devices. Only with rarely encountered photo formats may limitations arise. It’s a pity that despite the manufacturer's claims, there is a lack of proper support for HEIC files. The TV detects them in the media browser, but in practice, it can't open them.

The built-in media player in the OLED950 model works exceptionally well. During our tests, the device handled practically every format we threw at it. Whether they were video files, audio tracks, or photos, the TV played them without any issues. It's hard to find any weaknesses in its support for the most popular standards. However, if someone still finds something lacking (which seems unlikely), the operating system comes to the rescue. Thanks to the presence of Google TV, we are not solely reliant on the default solutions. At any time, you can enter the app store and install an external player, such as the popular VLC or Kodi. This ensures that the TV can handle literally any file from our home library.

Sound

7.9/10

8.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    85dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

QN990F can really play nicely. For such a slim design, the sound is surprisingly clear and detailed, so one can be satisfied for everyday movie watching or gaming. Unfortunately, as is often the case with Samsung's ultra-thin TVs, there’s a lack of bass – and you notice it straight away. Action scenes or more intense effects don't have the depth that a decent soundbar or home theatre system would provide. On the positive side, it does support Dolby Atmos. This is currently the most popular surround sound codec in films and gives a much greater sense of immersion in the action. Unfortunately, as always with Samsung, there is a lack of support for DTS:X. This format is indeed appearing less frequently in new productions, but it is still valued by fans of physical Blu-ray media.

The speaker setup here is a 2.1 system with a total power of 70 W, which offers a solid dose of quality sound. It plays clearly, and thanks to the additional subwoofer at the back of the enclosure, the sound is deep and has a distinct punch. This element is often lacking in cheaper models, where the bass is practically non-existent. However, we must face the truth when comparing it to the OLED910 model. That television, equipped with a built-in Bowers & Wilkins soundbar, simply performs much better. Was it a good decision? In our opinion, the outstanding audio of the 910 model provides greater value. Choosing the 950 model makes sense mainly if you are big fans of Ambilight, and you’ve got the sound issue sorted out with an external home theatre or soundbar.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video