Samsung QN990F vs Philips OLED820

Direct compare

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”98”

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”77”

Panel type: LCD VA (wide viewing angle)

Resolution: 7680x4320

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3810x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.6

8.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.7

    8.3

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.7

    8.6

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.6

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    9.2

    9.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    7.9

    6.5

  • Watching in bright light

    5.2

    5.7

  • Utility functions

    7.5

    6.8

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.9

    7.7

Advantages

  • Amazing Design

  • Wireless module Wiraless One Connect

  • Great black

  • High brightness

  • Matte display effectively reduces reflections

  • Good viewing angles

  • The fastest TV in the world - refresh rate 4K@240Hz and 8K@120Hz great for sports

  • Many features for gamers: HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, HGiG, Gamebar

  • Very fast and intuitive operating system Tizen OS

  • Perfect contrast and black level thanks to the WOLED panel

  • High HDR brightness (up to 1300 nits) and wide coverage of the DCI-P3 colour space (99%)

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Excellent motion smoothness, no blur, refresh rate up to 144 Hz

  • Full support for gamers: HDMI 2.1 (2 ports), VRR, ALLM, HGiG, Dolby Vision in games, low input lag

  • Ambilight, which significantly enhances the viewing experience and sets the TV apart from the competition

  • Google TV system with a massive app base and an excellent voice assistant

  • Extras including: Backlit remote and swivel stand

  • Support for audio formats Dolby Atmos and DTS:X

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very high price

  • Local dimming algorithms could be better refined

  • Missing Dolby Vision and DTS:X

  • High input lag with wireless connection using Wiraless One Connect

  • Only two HDMI 2.1 ports (with 2 consoles and a soundbar, we are forced to "juggle" the cables)

  • Lack of many classic "TV" features such as USB recording or PiP mode, infrared remote may be annoying

  • Slight issues with colour matching (much better than last year but still far from the competition)

  • Issues with font readability when working with PC (lack of full Chroma 4:4:4 support)

Our verdict

Samsung QN990F is a television that makes a huge impression from the very first moment. It's probably one of the most beautiful models on the market – ultra-slim, with an almost invisible frame and a stand that makes it look like the screen is levitating above the table. On top of that, there's the futuristic Wiraless One Connect module, this time in a wireless version, which helps to reduce the number of cables in the living room and gives the whole setup a modern character. But it doesn't stop at design. The QN990F also boasts a powerful specification. Mini-LED with over a thousand dimming zones can generate contrast that occasionally rivals that of OLEDs. "Additionally, there's very high HDR brightness and a new matte screen that effectively eliminates reflections. And when we add excellent motion smoothness with a refresh rate of up to 240 Hz in 4K, we have a set of features that truly impress. Samsung hasn't forgotten about gamers – we have Game Bar, VRR, ALLM, five HDMI 2.1 ports, and phenomenal input lag at the level of 10–15 ms (when connected via micro HDMI).

And this is where we get to the crux of the matter. Because while the QN990F impresses on paper and in many tests, in practice, some solutions still require fine-tuning. The wireless One Connect module raises input lag to unacceptable levels for gamers, Mini-LED can struggle in challenging scenes with a lot of detail, and the lack of Dolby Vision or DTS:X reminds us that Samsung is stubbornly following its own path, sometimes at the expense of the user. Despite this, the QN990F is a television that shows the direction of industry development. It's not a model for everyone – but for those who love gadgets, technological innovations, and want a screen in their living room that looks like it's from the future. However, if someone is looking solely for the best picture quality, they will even find models within Samsung's portfolio that perform significantly better – maybe without 8K, but with more refined contrast or colours. Because 8K still remains a technology that looks firmly towards the future and QN990F shows what televisions of tomorrow might look like. But are we – the viewers – ready to pay such a high price for this vision and accept the compromises that come with it?

The Philips OLED820 is a very successful and significant step forward compared to last year's model, the OLED 819. For many people, the main reason for purchasing will, of course, be Ambilight: a multicoloured backlighting system that distinguishes Philips televisions from the competition. It's no surprise, as it made a huge impression on us as well. It’s not just an impressive gadget, but a real addition that can change the perception of the content being watched and add depth to it. However, Ambilight should not overshadow what the OLED820 offers as a screen. We have almost infinite contrast, high brightness in HDR films, and excellent colour reproduction, which becomes even better after a slight adjustment or professional calibration. This set guarantees one of the best images available on the market today, and we are also aware that the television offers something unique and unprecedented anywhere else. It is also equipment that will perform well in gaming. The 144 Hz panel and HDMI 2.1 ports provide access to the full capabilities of next-generation consoles, and the low input lag makes gameplay exceptionally responsive. The operating system – Google TV – also deserves praise. It’s a much better solution than the proprietary Titan OS found in lower Philips models, such as the OLED770. This is a significant argument for paying extra for this model. A larger library of applications, a more efficient voice assistant, and fewer system errors translate to a clearly better everyday experience. Of course, the Philips OLED 820 is not free from minor shortcomings – there are some software gaps, and some features could be better refined. Nevertheless, the overall presentation is very solid. Perhaps the OLED820 is not a revolutionary television, but it is a very successful and well-balanced offering in Philips' lineup. It combines excellent picture quality, a full set of features for gamers, and a unique addition in the form of Ambilight. If you are looking for a solid mid-range OLED that gives not only a good picture but also something distinctive and exceptional, the OLED820 should be high on your shopping list.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Super Premium
Premium
Stand type
Central
Central
Stand type
stand-type-Silver
stand-type-Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Swivel
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand, One Connect Box
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.6/10

10/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 1344 (28 x 48)

Contrast:

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

89,250:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

28,200:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

12,100:1

Review Samsung QN990F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,050:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED820 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

QN990F is the top representative of the Neo QLED series, so it had to feature Mini-LED technology. The 65-inch unit we tested received a VA panel and as many as 1344 local dimming zones, which looks really impressive on paper. In practice, this can provide a level of contrast that is close to ideal. In less demanding scenes, such as in the film Oblivion, the QN990F performed on par with OLED televisions – the blacks were practically infinite, and the picture looked stunning. However, it wasn't always so rosy. Or perhaps black and white? Like every Mini-LED, the QN990F has its limitations, and in more challenging sequences, it can leave mixed impressions. Where there is a vast amount of fine detail on the screen, the algorithms controlling the zones simply got confused. The contrast dropped, and a noticeable glow appeared around bright elements – the so-called halo effect. Additionally, in films recorded in a 21:9 (2.35:1) format, we noticed that the QN990F was unable to perfectly dim the pitch-black film bars, leaving a silver/blue haze on them. One could say that Samsung in this model prioritized the visibility of details over the perfect depth of black. On one hand, this yields very good results in several scenes, but on the other hand, in a television of this class, we expected the local dimming issue to be refined even further. The end result is simply "okay," and at this price point, we would expect something more than just a satisfactory outcome.

Contrast and black are the domain of OLEDs, and the Philips OLED820 is no exception. The WOLED panel from LG Display works exactly like the models LG C5 or Samsung S90F and delivers precisely what we expect – perfect black and infinite contrast. Whether we're watching challenging scenes full of fine details or simpler shots drenched in uniform black, the television always performs superbly. It separates light from dark with surgical precision, creating an extraordinary sense of depth in the image. And while there can be discussions about different technologies, in this category OLED simply rules, and the Philips OLED820 only confirms this rule.

HDR effect quality

6.6/10

7.5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.1%, Bt.2020: 67.0%
DCI P3: 99.3%, Bt.2020: 76.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

802 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

689 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

1076 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

577 nit

Review Samsung QN990F Brightness measurement

Result

735 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1035 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1235 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1356 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

1315 nit

Review Philips OLED820 Brightness measurement

Result

521 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED820

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

Samsung QN990F

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

Samsung QN990F is one of the bright televisions, and this is immediately apparent in tests. In measurements, it achieved around 1300 nits, which in practice allows you to enjoy films as their creators intended. Bright scenes have the right strength, lights shine, and the impression is truly cinematic. In standard test patterns, sequences number 1, 3, and 5 performed the best – there, brightness remained around 800-1000 nits, and the image looked very natural. In more difficult segments, it could dip to around 600 nits, but the level was still sufficient for details to be clearly visible. However, it should be added that with such highly contrasted shots, the halo effect returns – the same one we mentioned regarding blacks. Bright elements can leave a glow on dark backgrounds, and this is immediately noticeable. As we are dealing with a QLED, the colour palette is expanded, and the colours present themselves impressively. The problem is that with such a flagship model, we expected better numbers. 91% coverage of DCI-P3 and about 67% BT.2020 are results that can be considered solid but not outstanding. This gives an image that is vibrant and appealing; however, the competition in this and lower price ranges can show even more.

When it comes to HDR quality, the Philips OLED820 uses the same class of WOLED panel found in its biggest rivals – the LG C5 and the Samsung S90F. This means we can expect really solid results. This year, mid-range OLED panels can exceed the threshold of a thousand nits, and the tested model reaches around 1300 nits in some films. This is an outstanding result, allowing the director's vision to be conveyed with incredible precision, as this is the brightness range in which modern productions are mastered. Of course, there are situations where even the OLED820 has to compromise. Full-screen scenes flooded with white, like those in the film The Meg, can drop brightness to 400–500 nits, which clearly diminishes the effect. This is a characteristic of OLED technology that has not yet been fully eliminated. Despite this limitation, it's hard not to appreciate the HDR in this model – high luminance and a wide coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette at 99% make the image look simply fantastic.

Factory color reproduction

7/10

6.7/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the QN990F in Filmmaker mode, which is the best out-of-the-box setting available. Right from the start, we noticed a few significant issues. The biggest problem was with white balance. Due to too little blue, as well as incorrect ratios between red and blue, the image—especially in scenes with a lot of white—appeared too yellow, and at times even orange. On the Color Checker palette, these errors didn't look dramatic as they hovered around a value of 4, but in everyday viewing, especially with strong whites, they were most noticeable. We also noticed problems with brightness management—the TV struggled to maintain details in the smallest parts of the image, mainly due to how it manages backlight zones. Fortunately, Samsung provides plenty of room for adjustment when it comes to setting corrections. We know that with proper calibration, much more can be extracted from this screen.

The colour reproduction in the factory settings really surprised us, and in a positive way. The Philips OLED820, switched to Filmmaker mode, immediately showed that it was quite well tuned in terms of colour. The white balance was relatively accurate, although there was a slight deficiency in the blue hue, which sometimes gave the image a slightly yellowish tint. However, this is not a drawback that particularly interferes with everyday viewing. A bigger problem arose with the brightness characteristics. The gamma chart clearly deviated from the ideal, as the line was below the expected values, causing the image to be excessively brightened, and the colours looked as if they were covered with a light milky filter. This effect was also noticeable in tests using the Colour Checker pattern, where more pronounced errors appeared.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.5/10

9.3/10

After carrying out the calibration, we managed to bring the white balance into order and eliminate the earlier shortcomings in shades of blue. As a result, the picture no longer looked like it had a slight yellowish filter – the whites are cleaner, and the whole thing presents itself much more naturally. We also managed to tame the brightness characteristic in HDR content to some extent. The television now handles maintaining detail in blacks much better and does not lose them as much as before. However, when we look at the EOTF curve and how the QN990F reproduces brightness in films, it is evident that it still tends to accentuate details in dark areas more strongly. This is a characteristic feature of Mini-LED technology and, more specifically, how it is managed by the QN990F, which is practically impossible to eliminate completely. Despite this, after calibration, the picture looks significantly more natural, mainly due to the correct exposure of white light. The final effect is definitely more pleasant to the eye and closer to what we expect from a flagship television.

After calibration, both the Filmmaker mode and the gaming mode improved quite a bit. A slight adjustment of the white balance and enhancement of the brightness characteristics yielded excellent results with SDR content – the image looked nearly perfect, natural, and very close to the reference. For HDR material, the situation was similar; the colours looked fantastic, and it was hard to find fault with anything. However, we did notice a certain characteristic, which we had already pointed out when comparing scenes from the film Billy Lynn. The analysis of the EOTF curve showed that the TV has a slight tendency to dim details in the blacks, meaning that the darkest parts are not always displayed exactly as the director intended. Nevertheless, the effect after calibration is superb, and the OLED820 is emerging as one of the more interesting screens in its class. A little bit of fine-tuning is all that’s needed, and there’s really nothing to worry about.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9.2/10

6.5/10

In terms of tonal transition fluidity, the QN990F shows class. It is one of the best results we have seen so far. In most scenes, there is no question of visible colour banding or typical stair-stepping – the transitions are smooth and natural, and the image gives an impression of being incredibly coherent. Of course, as with practically every television, some issues with gradation can be observed in very dark shots. Banding can be noticeable there, but this is a typical phenomenon and should not affect the evaluation of the QN990F itself. Compared to the competition, it looks really very good, and the experience of viewing is simply excellent, and you can be sure that nothing will distract us from our sight.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is unfortunately the Achilles' heel of the Philips OLED820. During testing, we noticed slight issues with colour blending – both in bright and darker scenes, there is a noticeable banding that detracts from the naturalness of the image. It must be said that compared to last year's model, the OLED 819, there is a significant improvement, but nonetheless, the competition performs better in this category.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

The QN990F deserves the highest praise for its upscaling capabilities. The processor responsible for 'lifting' classic TV to 8K resolution does a really decent job. Watching footage in 576p, we had no illusions that we would suddenly see a miraculous transformation like in an advertisement, where the image magically turns into crystal-clear 8K. Nevertheless, the final effect was surprisingly good; the picture looked clean and sharp. It's just a shame that the TV, like most Samsung models, has an overscan issue, which slightly cuts off the edges of the screen from the left side.

When it comes to image processing, Samsung offers a feature called "noise reduction," which in theory should improve tonal transitions in older materials, where they are usually more noticeable. Unfortunately, here we felt quite disappointed. The feature performs poorly – it struggles with unwanted banding and can even introduce its own artifacts. On the plus side, it’s worth noting that the TV doesn’t remove film grain when using this feature, but in practice, that’s a poor consolation when the noise reduction itself turns out to be practically useless.

Fortunately, the earlier effects of the mentioned posterisation can be quite effectively mitigated. The "distortion reduction" feature set to medium handles unwanted colour banding well, improving the smoothness of tonal transitions. It does sometimes work a bit too aggressively and smooths out some details – such as the minor imperfections of the actors’ skin – but despite that, it can be considered worth using without major compromises. The upscaling in the OLED820 also performs well. The test image with the model is exceptionally soft, sometimes perhaps too much, although this can be remedied with a slight increase in sharpness in the picture menu – that's a matter of individual preference. The absence of overscan issues with very low-resolution content is also commendable, allowing us to not worry about the image being unnecessarily cropped.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.9/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
240Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
No
Brightness drop with BFI
76%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Smużenie (4K@240Hz):

Smużenie (4K@144Hz):

QN990F can easily be called one of the fastest TVs in the world. In 4K mode, it can display images at a frequency of up to 240 Hz, which until now was more associated with gaming monitors than with living room TVs. However, in everyday viewing, what's more important is how it handles an 8K signal at 120 Hz – and it performs very well here too. Motion remains smooth, and the TV handles even the most demanding content without breaking a sweat. Additionally, there's the motion smoother, or "Image Clarity." Thanks to this, you can adjust the picture to your preferences – leave it slightly cinematic with a bit of judder or switch to maximum smoothness, which works brilliantly for things like sports broadcasts.

Motion fluidity is an area where OLEDs always shine, and the Philips OLED820 confirms this rule. The panel itself offers a refresh rate of 144 Hz, which will mainly benefit PC gamers, but even with standard TV sources or consoles, where it operates at 120 Hz, motion is fast, sharp, and simultaneously smooth, without any signs of smearing. This is thanks to the remarkable response time between pixels, which ensures the image maintains clarity in every dynamic scene. The manufacturer has also added their own smoothness enhancer called "Motion Style." In the menu, we find two sliders – the first, responsible for smoothness, allows for the adjustment of the number of artificially added frames in films. This way, we can choose a raw, cinematic character with clearly visible film frames or a more theatrical image with smooth motion. The second slider is for motion blur reduction, particularly useful in sports broadcasts. Here, we definitely recommend setting it to the maximum value, as the effect is truly excellent.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 240Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

It has to be said straightforwardly – the QN990F is one of those televisions that scream they were designed with gamers in mind. Samsung has been developing its gaming solutions for years, but here we have a true package. Sure, it lacks Dolby Vision support in games, which is a downside that will always come up in discussions. However, aside from that, the list of features is truly impressive. To start, we have the Game Bar – a handy menu that allows you to quickly check and change game-related settings. You can see things like VRR enabled, frame rate, or aspect ratio settings there. It's like a little “dashboard” so you don’t have to dig deep into the menu to fix something. Since the word VRR was mentioned: yes, variable refresh rate is present here and works flawlessly. Plus, there's ALLM, which automatically switches the television to game mode as soon as the console is turned on. These may seem like small details, but together they make using the QN990F simply convenient and hassle-free.

However, the greatest impression comes from the number of ports. Four wireless HDMI 2.1 ports as standard is already great news, as there's no need to choose whether to connect the console, the receiver, or maybe even the PC. There's comfortably enough room for everything here. And if we add another micro HDMI (which we recommend connecting directly to the console), hidden within the casing, then in practice we have five inputs in full 2.1 standard. Let’s also add support for high refresh rates – 120 Hz in 8K or even 240 Hz in 4K – and we get a television that not only keeps up with the new consoles but also feels ready for consoles that aren’t even out yet.

The Philips OLED820 is one of the most comprehensive TVs for gamers. Onboard, we find practically everything one could expect: two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gbps (shame there aren't four), Variable Refresh Rate (VRR), Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM), support for Dolby Vision in games, and a good implementation of the HGiG mode. The TV also handles lower resolutions at 120 Hz without issue, so you can count on great flexibility when choosing different picture modes on your console. Philips also adds a Game Bar – a panel that allows you to change picture modes, add a crosshair, or preview parameters. Although it looks a bit clunky and is less refined than its competitors, it gets the job done. In practice, therefore, the OLED820, in addition to a full set of four HDMI 2.1 connections, offers almost everything a gamer could need.

Input lag

9.9/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
15 ms
13 ms
1080p120
9 ms
5 ms
2160p60
13 ms
13 ms
2160p120
10 ms
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
13 ms
2160p120
10 ms
5 ms
4320p60
17 ms

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

If we look at the table with input lag results, the QN990F performs phenomenally – in the range of 10–15 ms, which is practically on par with gaming monitors. But there are a few "buts". First of all, the measurements taken using an additional micro HDMI, which Samsung cleverly hid in the TV's casing, show its full capabilities. At that point, the image reacts instantly and gaming is pure pleasure. The problem starts when we connect the console to the wireless One Connect module. Here, input lag spikes – the measuring device showed values higher by even 20 ms for the first 1–2 seconds, before the delays stabilised at around 40 ms. That's a level which is noticeable in faster games. Interestingly, the module was sitting nearby, at a distance of 2–3 metres, so the signal did not have any difficult conditions. It's not hard to imagine that if we hide it, for example, behind a couch at a distance of 6–10 metres, input lag could exceed even 100-150 ms. And those are values that are completely unacceptable for gaming.

Input lag measurements for Wireless One Connect from a distance of 2-3m are as follows:

SDR

Input lag

HDR

Input lag

1080p60

39 ms

1080p120

25 ms

2160p60

39 ms

2160p60

39 ms

2160p120

26 ms

2160p120

26 ms

4320p60

43 ms

4320p60

43 ms

The input lag on the Philips OLED820 is truly at a reference level. Measurements showed values below 5 ms, placing it among the very best TVs available on the market. Even the Dolby Vision mode does not cause it any issues in this regard, which is quite a rare phenomenon. In practice, this means an instantaneous response to every movement, no noticeable delays, and complete comfort in dynamic games. In short, excellent results that will please even the most demanding gamers.

Compatibility with PC

7.9/10

6.5/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Average
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
10ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RWBG
Max refresh rate
240Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

QN990F can impress when we connect a computer for gaming. The panel with a refresh rate of up to 240 Hz, support for G-Sync, and a really decent input lag make the TV function like a gigantic gaming monitor. For gaming, this setup is a dream come true, and the responsiveness here is at a level rarely seen in regular TVs.

Unfortunately, the situation is much worse for regular PC work. It’s a shame because the 8K resolution theoretically has huge potential - you can put even a 65-inch screen on your desk and sit close to the screen, taking advantage of the high pixel density. However, in practice, the magic fades. Despite proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4, which should guarantee sharp fonts, the readability on the QN990F is not perfect. The letters have slight edge issues, and prolonged work with text is simply not comfortable. It’s a shame, as gamers truly have a lot of room to play here, and the capabilities in games are excellent. However, this TV is not really suitable for everyday office work.

Cooperation with a PC for the Philips OLED820 varies depending on the usage. It performs exceptionally well for gaming: the high refresh rate of 144 Hz combined with G-Sync support provides a smoothness and responsiveness that other TVs would envy. However, the situation is less favourable for text work. The lack of proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4 means that fonts on coloured backgrounds can appear slightly blurry, which significantly lowers the comfort of working. Therefore, it’s hard to recommend the OLED820 as a screen for office work with text or numbers. It's a pity that the manufacturer couldn’t learn from last year’s models, and this flaw continues to persist.

Viewing angles

6.5/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
57%
34%

Samsung has applied a viewing angle enhancing coating in the QN990F and it actually works. We feel that this year it performs a bit worse than last year's models, but the effect is still impressive. For a VA panel, the viewing angles are really very good – to the point that they can be compared to what IPS panel TVs offer. This means that even when viewing from the side, we do not lose clarity or colour.

The viewing angles on the Philips OLED820 are another advantage that should please you. OLEDs have always been characterised by nearly perfect angles, so regardless of where we're looking from, the image remains clear and readable. True, the classic WOLED panel doesn't measure up to technologies like MLA OLED or QD-OLED, but it's still hard to find fault here. The angles are simply excellent.

TV efficiency during daytime

5.2/10

5.7/10

Matrix coating
Matte
Glare
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Average
Very Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips OLED820: 345 cd/m2

Samsung QN990F: 363 cd/m2

One of the biggest innovations in this year's Neo QLED 8K TVs is the matte displays. Yes, you read that right – Samsung has implemented a matte finish in its flagship model, and we have to admit that the effect is truly impressive. Reflections practically vanish, the screen doesn’t turn into a mirror, and watching in a bright living room suddenly becomes much more enjoyable. Of course, every rose has its thorns. The matte finish means that black looks a bit washed out during the day, and colours lose some of their vibrancy. It’s a compromise – either we battle reflections, or we maintain maximum depth of colours.

As for brightness, the QN990F is not a record-breaker. In TV mode, it reaches around 370–400 nits, which is acceptable for everyday TV viewing, but in very bright, sunlit rooms, it may prove insufficient to completely "break through" the light coming into the room.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Software version during testing
T-RSPFDEUC-0090-1050.6 E2500007, BT-S
TPM231WW_R.201.100.146.207
Image processor
MT5896 3GB

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

TV features

7.5/10

6.8/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 5 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Wyszukiwanie głosowe
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

Classic Features and Connections

Even though the QN990F looks like a television from the future, if someone just wants to watch regular TV – it's possible to do so quite comfortably. Onboard, we have several practical additions, such as PiP, which allows viewing two sources simultaneously. There's no point even mentioning Bluetooth, as it's already standard. However, special attention should be given to the whole concept of wireless operation. The One Connect module can be placed in a different location than the television itself, which is a significant convenience for those who frequently switch devices. Of course, it still needs to be plugged in, so it’s not completely cable-free, but it’s hard not to see it as a display of Samsung's capabilities – a taste of what televisions of the future may look like.

Smart TV System: Tizen

As for the operating system, Samsung has opted for its proprietary Tizen, which, despite being a closed ecosystem, operates incredibly smoothly. It's one of the fastest, if not the fastest operating systems in televisions, and very intuitive at that. All classic smart features are in place: AirPlay, screen mirroring, voice search in multiple languages, and quick access to the most important streaming applications. There may be a few niche programmes missing, but the vast majority of users will find everything they need here.

GoogleTV on OLED820

Philips OLED820 runs on the Google TV system, which immediately places it among televisions that truly provide user freedom. It’s a fantastic platform that doesn’t need any introduction – we find almost an endless number of apps here, from popular VOD services to niche programmes or games. Google TV also allows for personalisation of the home screen, tailoring content to our preferences, so the television actually “learns” our viewing style. A huge plus is also the Google voice assistant – fast, natural, and effective. It can understand even less obvious questions, and in practice, it works significantly better than many competitors. Unfortunately, there was a hiccup – the screen mirroring function simply didn’t work during testing. This can be seen as a minor issue, but in 2025, such things simply shouldn’t happen.

Classic Features of OLED820

When it comes to classic features, the OLED820 doesn’t attempt to play conservatively. On one hand, we get a backlit remote control with a numeric keypad, which is quite well organised and comfortable to use. On the other hand, you have to aim it at the screen, as it works on infrared, which is more reminiscent of equipment from a decade ago than a modern television. It also lacks a few features that are often found in competitors – there’s no USB recording from tuners or a PiP mode. A nice touch among the classic solutions is the mini jack analogue input for headphones. This is rare nowadays and can be quite useful – whether for a senior citizen with an additional headphone station or for someone wanting to connect older speakers.

AmbilightTV OLED820

You can’t overlook Ambilight, which is a hallmark of Philips. This solution impacts not only the appearance of the television but also the reception of content. The lighting system can be set in various ways, from a multi-coloured mode dynamically tracking the image to calmer, static lighting. We definitely recommend the latter option, as the gentle light behind the screen makes the content viewed, in combination with the OLED matrix, appear even deeper and more engaging. It’s a simple yet very striking addition that has characterised Philips televisions for years.

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

QN990F handles playback of files from USB practically without a hitch. Movies, music, photos – most popular formats work without the slightest issues and there's no need to fiddle with additional players or devices. Only with rarely encountered photo formats may limitations arise. It’s a pity that despite the manufacturer's claims, there is a lack of proper support for HEIC files. The TV detects them in the media browser, but in practice, it can't open them.

The Philips OLED820 has a built-in file player with USB, which at first glance looks quite clunky, but in practice works surprisingly well. You could even say it's one of the best built-in players available in televisions. It handles virtually every type of file: photos, videos, or music, with minor exceptions that most of the competition also does not support. And if someone still finds something missing, there's always the option to install the VLC app from the Google Play library and the problem disappears.

Apps

8.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Sound

7.9/10

7.7/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

QN990F can really play nicely. For such a slim design, the sound is surprisingly clear and detailed, so one can be satisfied for everyday movie watching or gaming. Unfortunately, as is often the case with Samsung's ultra-thin TVs, there’s a lack of bass – and you notice it straight away. Action scenes or more intense effects don't have the depth that a decent soundbar or home theatre system would provide. On the positive side, it does support Dolby Atmos. This is currently the most popular surround sound codec in films and gives a much greater sense of immersion in the action. Unfortunately, as always with Samsung, there is a lack of support for DTS:X. This format is indeed appearing less frequently in new productions, but it is still valued by fans of physical Blu-ray media.

Philips OLED 820 features a built-in 4.1 speaker system with a total output of 70 W. At the back of the casing, there’s a subwoofer that delivers quite solid and deep bass. The classic speakers responsible for the remaining sound range are located at the bottom of the television, which means that the audio doesn't always distribute as we would like. However, the overall sound quality can be considered satisfactory – series, TV shows, or the occasional music listening all perform well with a slight bass enhancement. For everyday use, this should be sufficient, although we still recommend purchasing even an inexpensive soundbar, which will significantly improve the user experience.

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC