Samsung QN900F vs Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

Direct comparison

NeoQLED 8K / QN900F

PQS9011 / PQS9001 / the one 2026

Info

Available screen sizes: 65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.8

6.8

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.3

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.3

    6.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    7.4

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    9.1

    7.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.4

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    7.1

    6.1

  • Utility functions

    7.2

    7.6

  • Apps

    9.3

    7.2

  • Sound quality

    8.2

    6.9

Advantages

  • Good blacks

  • Very high brightness - up to 2000 nits in HDR

  • Excellent motion fluidity - 4k@165hz with low motion blur

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, Game-bar, low input lag

  • Decent viewing angles

  • High usability efficiency in difficult lighting conditions: Matte screen + high brightness

  • Pleasant and very fast operating system: Tizen

  • Pleasant sound from built-in speakers

  • Ambilight, which gives evening viewing sessions a unique ambience and improves the perceived native contrast of the VA panel

  • Excellent panel response time: minimal motion blur of moving objects

  • Many features for gamers: four HDMI 2.1 ports, VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • 144 Hz refresh at 4K and 240 Hz at Full HD from a PC

  • Good coverage of a wide colour gamut: PFS LED

  • Dolby Vision, which genuinely helps the TV with HDR content

  • Decent brightness of around 500 nits, useful for daytime viewing

  • Rotating stand

Disadvantages

No like
  • Local dimming algorithms could have been better refined

  • Missing support for recording from built-in tuners

  • Missing DTS:X (home theatre)

  • No local dimming: average blacks in the evening and a limited HDR effect

  • Smaller app library than the competition

  • Poor viewing angles (can be mitigated with a swivel stand)

  • Very high input lag in games with Dolby Vision

  • Significant errors in HDR colour reproduction (no CMS adjustment available)

  • IR remote that requires aiming

Our verdict

The Samsung QN900F is a television that can make a huge impression. The greatest strength of this model is the combination of Mini-LED backlighting with a matte panel. This not only provides decent blacks but above all incredible brightness and excellent visibility in any conditions. During the day, in a brightly lit room, it is probably the best-performing television in Samsung's offering this year. Gamers will also find plenty to like here – even though it's an 8K screen, it can run at 165 Hz in 4K. In addition, it comes with a full suite of HDMI 2.1, VRR and ALLM features, and low input lag, so the QN900F is well-suited for both next-gen consoles and PCs. The design also deserves big praise – when mounted on the wall, with its thick metal frame, this model resembles a more luxurious version of the iconic The Frame. Combined with the matte panel and Art Store mode, it can actually be treated as a piece of equipment that not only plays and shines but also decorates the living room.

However, not everything is perfect. Despite its impressive specs, managing local dimming doesn't always perform as well as one might expect. Given the large number of zones, Samsung could improve its control over blacks and HDR effects – it’s clear that the potential is enormous, but this doesn't always translate to top-tier picture quality. Additionally, it’s worth noting that 8K resolution is still more of a novelty than a real necessity, and the price of this model makes it easy to start looking for cheaper alternatives, even within Samsung's own offerings. Despite these reservations, the QN900F is a television that can definitely impress. Its strength lies not in the 8K itself, but in how it presents the picture, how it looks, and the enjoyment it provides when using it.

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

The idea behind The One series has remained practically unchanged for years, and with the Philips PQS9001 this is both an advantage and its biggest weakness. Once again, we get a versatile mid-range TV whose main distinguishing feature is Ambilight. The lighting that follows what is happening on the screen can completely change the atmosphere of an evening movie session, and for many people it will be the main reason to choose this TV. That is hardly surprising, because once you get used to the effect, it can be difficult to go back to watching without it. The picture quality itself is good, but we have already seen a very similar level from this series in previous years. The VA panel provides decent blacks, colours are nicely saturated, and the brightness is sufficient for comfortable viewing in a typical living room. It is a shame, however, that Philips did not take another step forward and introduce at least basic local dimming. In a dark room, blacks can look noticeably bluish, and HDR, while clearly visible, does not make as strong an impression as it could. After so many years of The One being on the market, we would have expected a little more progress here.

There has, however, been a noticeable improvement in Titan OS. Compared with last year, and especially with the version from two years ago, the system has become much more pleasant to use. There are more apps, many smaller functions have been improved, and a number of irritating bugs we previously complained about have been fixed. Overall, it works reasonably well, although we are once again frustrated by the remote control, which still requires you to point it directly at the TV. Philips continues to rely on infrared for regular navigation, even though voice control uses a wireless connection. That makes it even harder to understand why the same connection was not used for navigating the menus. The One also has quite a lot to offer gamers. Four HDMI 2.1 ports and a broad set of gaming features are one thing, but what impressed us most was the panel’s response time. Our unit showed practically no visible smearing, even on dark backgrounds, which is quite rare for an LCD TV with a VA panel. Philips deserves a lot of credit for that. The ability to play at 4K 144 Hz or Full HD 240 Hz also makes the TV an interesting option for PC users. Unfortunately, there is still one unfinished element: using Dolby Vision in games on Xbox results in very high input lag.

The PQS9000 therefore leaves us with mixed feelings. It can surprise with excellent motion handling and shows that Philips has clearly worked on its operating system, but we do not see a similar step forward in picture quality. This is a TV we can recommend primarily to fans of Ambilight. If that lighting system is the main reason you are considering a Philips, then buying The One makes a lot of sense. It is still worth checking, however, whether you can find a Mini LED model with good local dimming at a similar price. Such a TV may offer deeper blacks and more impressive HDR performance. In the end, the choice comes down to what matters more to you: the atmosphere created by Ambilight or better picture quality itself.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio), IR (remote)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.2/10

5.8/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 1056 (24 x 44)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

126,000:1

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

41,650:1

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

49,800:1

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,350:1

Review Samsung QN900F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,250:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,950:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,600:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,750:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The QN900F is equipped with a VA panel, which in itself provides decent contrast, but that’s not where its greatest strength lies. This is a mini-LED TV, so we have local dimming technology here, allowing selected areas of the image to be dimmed. In the 65-inch variant, we counted as many as 1,056 zones, which resulted in really solid performance. In the best possible scenario, the QN900F achieved a contrast exceeding 100,000:1, which is an absolutely impressive result – at such a moment, the blacks could really resemble those of an OLED. However, it's important to remember that it is not an OLED and has its classic mini-LED quirks. Because the TV must decide which zone to brighten and which to dim, there are moments when the algorithm doesn’t quite know what to do. This was the case, for example, in one of our test scenes, where the QN900F prioritised brightness over the depth of black, resulting in a significant drop in contrast to a level of 2,300:1. Yes, elements on the screen were brighter, but around them was a characteristic glow (halo effect) – the black then resembled more of a navy blue. Generally, the black in the QN900F is really very good – but not quite enough to compare it with TVs that have organic panels.

Black levels and contrast on the Philips PQS9000 are decent for an LCD TV without local dimming. That's mainly down to the VA panel — in our movie scenes contrast often exceeded 5000:1, and at weaker points fell to around 4000:1. That delivers an image with quite good depth and a clear advantage over typical IPS panels, where blacks much more easily look grey. Unfortunately, that's about as far as the panel's capabilities go. The TV has no local dimming, so it can't dim a dark background separately while keeping strong highlights in another part of the screen. All it has is global dimming, which brightens or dims the whole backlight at once. In a completely dark room those limitations become visible: blacks take on a dark navy tint, and shadowy scenes lack the depth of a good screen with zoned local dimming. Thankfully Ambilight helps here. The light on the wall makes on-screen blacks appear deeper and helps mask the panel's glow a little. It doesn't change the TV's actual contrast, but it affects how our eyes perceive it. In this case Ambilight is therefore not just decorative, because it can also make evening viewing more pleasant.

HDR effect quality

6.4/10

5.5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 90.6%, Bt.2020: 66.0%
DCI P3: 94.5%, Bt.2020: 75.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

1200 nit

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

609 nit

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

850 nit

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

214 nit

Review Samsung QN900F Brightness measurement

Result

1415 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

449 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

467 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

487 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

486 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

507 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

Samsung QN900F

QN900F is a seriously bright TV – it can generate nearly 2000 nits, which is a level that remains unattainable for most models on the market. But the ability to achieve such brightness isn’t everything – it also matters whether the TV can make good use of it. And here it’s not always perfect. Our tests on cinematic scenes showed that in scenes like those from Life of Pi or The Meg, the QN900F can really shine – both literally and figuratively. In such moments, its greatest advantage, which is brightness, makes a huge impression. However, in more demanding scenes, things start to get tricky – similar to assessing contrast. When smaller, bright elements appear on the screen, the TV often struggles with the decision of whether to highlight them at the cost of black levels or perhaps maintain deep blacks but tone down the brightness. The result is situations where, for example, in the movie Sicario 2, the brightness dropped to just 200 nits, making details barely visible. The dimming algorithms could definitely be better, considering the class of this television.

The Philips PQS9000 is a moderately bright TV — in our HDR scenes it reached roughly 450 to just over 500 nits. That’s enough to notice a difference compared with SDR. Sun reflections, lamps or flares have a bit more punch than on basic TVs, whose brightness often tops out around 300 nits. It’s not, however, a level where bright elements look especially striking. The biggest limitation remains contrast. Without local dimming, brightening a bright object also lifts the black level around it. So there’s no clear separation between strong highlights and a dark background, and it’s that kind of pairing that really shows what HDR can do. The PQS9000 offers more than the cheapest models, but despite decent brightness the effect remains fairly basic.

Colours

Philips deserves praise for the colours. Although the manufacturer markets this model as QLED, it actually uses a PFS phosphor instead of quantum dots. The solution itself doesn’t prevent good results. On test patterns and in measurements of film scenes we recorded about 94% DCI-P3 coverage and 75% BT.2020. For this class of TV that’s really good. In practice this means the vast majority of colours used in HDR films and series will have appropriate saturation. Lush greens or intense reds aren’t a problem and add appeal to the picture. Limitations are easier to notice in some games and rarer content that use the most saturated shades of the wide BT.2020 gamut. In those situations, displays with wider colour coverage, such as SQD or RGB LED, can show more. At its price point the PQS9000 has nothing to be ashamed of.

Factory color reproduction

5/10

5.1/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Testing the QN900F in Filmmaker mode, the distinct characteristics of the image quickly became apparent, despite this mode being designed to reflect the director's vision. The white balance was not perfect – the television had noticeable deficits in blue. This caused the entire scene to take on a warmer tone, as if someone had applied a subtle filter in shades of yellow and orange to the image. In films where bright shots dominate – for example, scenes in the snow or under strong daylight – this gave an impression of a slight warmth that does not always convey the director's intention. The second noticeable element was the management of brightness. The QN900F sometimes brightened the image more than necessary. It looked as if the exposure had been slightly "pushed up," which caused the scene to lose some naturalness. Shadows could be too shallow, and contrast slightly weakened. These are not disqualifying errors, but for a television in this price range, it is clear that the Filmmaker mode has not been perfected one hundred percent. This is particularly noticeable when we compare its image to what was visible after the screen calibration.

The factory picture settings for Movie mode on the PQS9000 unfortunately need tweaking. In SDR the biggest problem is an excess of red in the white balance, which makes whites, greys and skin tones too warm, in places even slightly pink. Gamma runs below the reference across most of the range. The TV therefore brightens midtones and highlights, making the image look flatter than it should.

In HDR the white balance itself performs significantly better. Apart from minor deviations the components sit close together, so there isn’t the same obvious tint as in SDR. The EOTF curve, however, shows a slight brightening of parts of the image, and the biggest issue appears when measuring the wide colour gamut. Many shades deviate substantially from the target, with errors reaching ΔE 8–9. The good gamut coverage we praised earlier therefore doesn’t mean the TV hits specific colours accurately. It can display a wide range of colours, but out of the box it doesn’t use that range very precisely.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.7/10

7.7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, we managed to reduce the errors in white balance and adjust them to a level that can be considered acceptable. It's not perfect, but definitely better than the factory settings. Most colour errors now fall within the deltaE 2–3 range, so in practice, they shouldn't be noticeable during everyday viewing. The biggest improvement is evident in how the television handles brightness in SDR content. Shadows and details are no longer flattened, giving the image depth and naturalness. As for 4K HDR materials – colours themselves are no longer an issue, but one can still notice some imperfections in Mini-LED technology. The QN900F tends to excessively dim the smallest bright elements, causing them to sometimes disappear from view. However, it's worth noting that this is a much better solution than boosting the entire screen, which would ruin the contrast. This is more of a characteristic of the technology rather than a typical flaw, but it's worth keeping in mind. The effects of the calibration are really very good.

Calibration brought a big improvement, especially with SDR content. We managed to even out the white balance and remove the earlier colour cast, and the Color Checker measurements now look very good. Colours are much closer to what they should be on screen, so with regular TV or SDR movies we can be happy with the result. Unfortunately HDR spoils that a bit. On the one hand it's limited by the panel itself, because calibration won't improve contrast or replace local dimming. On the other hand there are colour errors we couldn't correct because the CMS settings, i.e. colour management, were greyed out and inactive. That loses Philips points with us. The white balance can be fine-tuned, but without access to wide gamut controls you can't as effectively sort out colours in HDR. It's a shame, because the SDR results show the potential is there, but we weren't allowed to fully make use of it everywhere.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.3/10

8.6/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The QN900F performs really well in terms of gradation. The tonal transitions are smooth and natural, without clear contours or banding. Interestingly, it is one of the few televisions that handles dark transitions better than bright ones – we only noticed subtle imperfections in strongly illuminated scenes like that from the Kingsman film. In most cases, the image simply looks very good and we have nothing to complain about.

Philips PQS9000 handles tonal transitions very well. It looks especially good in dark scenes, where shades blend smoothly into one another without visible banding or clear boundaries between colours. As a result, even on large, uniform areas the image looks smooth. Minor imperfections only appear in the brighter tones, but you have to look closely to notice them. During normal viewing they are unlikely to distract from the film. In this category, Philips performs really well.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

If we want to get rid of awkward tonal transitions that can be annoying, for example, while watching YouTube, we can use a feature called noise reduction. It works really effectively – it eliminates issues with colour blending when set to Standard level. However, as with most Samsung TVs, this comes with some compromises. Although we didn't notice this feature having a significant impact on the structure of objects in the image, it unfortunately reacts quite aggressively to film grain. Most people will likely appreciate this effect – the noise is simply removed – but if someone is looking for an image as close as possible to reference settings, we definitely recommend turning this option off.

When it comes to upscaling, or dealing with very low-quality content, the QN900F performs really well. On the test pattern with a model, the image looked clear, with only slight jaggedness that shouldn't bother most viewers. However, it’s worth mentioning one issue – the TV sometimes struggles with so-called overscan, which means older content may be slightly cut off. This can manifest, for example, with disappearing subtitles at the bottom of the screen.

Digital image processing on the Philips PQS9000 performs well, although we have a few reservations. The "Distortion Reduction" function helps smooth tonal transitions in lower-quality sources, but it works rather unevenly. It can improve one part of the picture, only to, moments later and still within the same scene, lose its way and show banding between shades again. On the plus side, it doesn't strip away film grain or fine noise, so the image retains its texture. We found the "Medium" setting worked best and that's the one we recommend.

The upscaling to 4K itself is adequate, though the image is very soft. Edges are heavily smoothed, which may leave some viewers wanting more clarity. In that case, it's worth slightly increasing the sharpness in the TV menu, as this will help emphasise edges more. Don't overdo the sharpness slider, though, or you'll get artificial halos instead of an improvement.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.8/10

8.1/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
165Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
74%
0%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@165Hz):

Blur (1080p@240Hz):

There’s really nothing to nitpick here – the QN900F looks great when it comes to motion. Thanks to its 165 Hz panel in 4K, you can confidently say that this TV is suited for both watching sports and gaming. The motion smoother plays a key role here. It works brilliantly – not just with sports broadcasts, where it can eliminate blurring and image judder, but also in games, where animation becomes clearer and more fluid. And of course, if someone likes to experiment with movies – they have that option as well. At lower settings, you can see a slight graininess and a filmic quality, while higher settings introduce a soap opera effect. So everyone can tailor the picture to their preferences, and the TV has the power to handle it.

In terms of motion handling the Philips PQS9000 performs exceptionally well for an LCD TV. It's not just about the 144 Hz refresh rate, but above all how quickly the panel itself responds. At 120 Hz you can hardly see the typical trailing smears behind moving objects. What's particularly pleasing is that this also applies to darker backgrounds, where many VA panels clearly struggle. Here motion remains clear, and in this respect Philips has pleasantly surprised us.

The "Motion Styles" feature is used to adjust how motion is displayed. It includes two sliders: "Smoothness" and "Blur Reduction", allowing you to tailor the effect to the material you're watching and your personal preferences. Our suggested settings are shown in the photo. Treat them as a starting point and see which level of smoothing suits you best.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

9.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 165Hz
    48 - 240Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

It's really good here. The QN900F offers a full set of features that we would expect from a top-notch gaming TV – we have VRR, ALLM, Game Bar, as well as cloud gaming apps. However, the biggest standout is its proprietary motion smoother, which also works in games and – importantly – does not add noticeable input lag. This is something we won't find in other competitors. Unfortunately, there is also something concerning. This year, Samsung has clearly messed up something with its TVs. During the testing of the QN900F before its update, it had the HGIG feature, which allowed for perfect adjustment of HDR settings for consoles. However, according to our procedures, we always update the hardware to the latest version – to give the manufacturer a chance to fix any issues. And here… it went the other way.After the update, the HGIG feature disappeared from the menu, making proper configuration of the console for HDR practically impossible. It was supposed to be complete – 165Hz, four HDMI 2.1 ports, a full gaming package… but unfortunately, it turned out to be a little mishap. What a shame.

Features for gamers

In terms of gaming features the Philips PQS9000 has a lot to offer. Four HDMI 2.1 ports let you connect multiple devices without having to choose which one gets the full capabilities. Consoles can use 120 Hz at Full HD, 1440p and 4K, and a PC can also run 144 Hz at 4K or 240 Hz if you drop to Full HD. There's also VRR, which matches the refresh rate to the frame rate and prevents screen tearing. Its range runs from 48 to 240 Hz, with the upper limit applying to Full HD mode.

It also includes ALLM, so the TV switches itself into game mode, and a properly working HGiG, which is handy when setting HDR on the console. There's a Game Bar for quick access to settings and signal information. The list even includes Dolby Vision gaming, but it's hard to enjoy because of very high input lag. Apart from that caveat, the feature set is really solid.

Input lag

9.8/10

7.2/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
32 ms
1080p120
12 ms
16 ms
2160p60
14 ms
32 ms
2160p120
11 ms
16 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
32 ms
2160p120
10 ms
16 ms
4320p60
18 ms

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
213 ms
2160p120 DV
106 ms

In terms of input lag, the QN900F presents a class of its own. Regardless of the resolution or refresh rate set – the response time remains instantaneous. It's one of those TVs where it's really hard to feel any delay. Gamers can count on full responsiveness and certainty that every action from the controller will be instantly reflected on the screen. In this category – it's simply the top shelf.

Input lag is less impressive than the rest of the gaming hardware. At 60 Hz we measured 32 ms, both in SDR and HDR. That's enough for more relaxed games, but in fast shooters you can already feel a slight lag. At 120 Hz the delay drops to 16 ms and gaming is noticeably more pleasant, though rivals can respond even faster. The biggest problem appears when Dolby Vision is enabled. At 60 Hz the delay is as much as 213 ms, and at 120 Hz it reaches 106 ms. The response to controller input is then clearly delayed, which seriously disrupts gameplay. So with the PQS9000 it's definitely better to stick with HDR10. Dolby Vision is supported in games, but its practical usefulness remains limited.

Compatibility with PC

8.4/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
18ms
16ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
165Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

QN900F is an 8K television, so even in a larger size it can be considered a fully-fledged work monitor – of course, provided that someone can actually fit such a colossus on their desk. The device supports chroma 4:4:4, so overall font readability is good, although we noticed some issues with the thinnest lines. This may be due to the fact that at its native 8K resolution, some texts are simply so microscopic that the television isn't necessarily perfectly suited for it. It sounds a bit silly, but how else can you explain it? 😉

On the other hand, the QN900F can be a great choice for PC gamers. It supports G-Sync technology, and at 4K resolution, it offers a refresh rate of up to 165 Hz. So if you have a very powerful computer, the QN900F will allow it to spread its wings and showcase its gaming prowess in full glory.

The PQS9000 earns a high mark for PC use mainly thanks to its gaming capabilities. Its 144 Hz refresh rate at 4K and support for G-Sync Compatible and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro let you synchronise frames on compatible NVIDIA and AMD cards. Working with text also fares well. Regular fonts are sharp and legible, and with proper 4:4:4 chroma support coloured letters, icons and small desktop elements do not lose their clarity. The biggest caveat concerns very small, dark text: the horizontal strokes of letters are noticeably darker than the vertical ones, which makes some characters look uneven. You probably won't notice this from the couch, but if someone plans to put The One on their desk and work up close, that flaw may become annoying.

Viewing angles

5/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
67%
68%

The viewing angles on the QN900F are pretty decent, but we feel that the "Ultra Viewing Angle" coating that Samsung heavily advertises underperforms compared to last year. Yes – the effect is still much better than most LCD TVs with VA panels, but it's still a fair way off from OLEDs or high-quality IPS panels. The image holds up reasonably well from the side, with colours not fading as quickly as with standard VAs; however, we expected more, especially since previous generations from Samsung have managed to perform better. Perhaps the addition of the matte coating that appeared in this year's 8K series is having an impact on this.

Viewing angles are one of the weakest points of the Philips PQS9001. Just move to the side and the colours noticeably lose saturation, and the image looks washed out and loses contrast. When watching with several people, seats directly in front of the screen will therefore be by far the best.

Unfortunately, this is a typical trait of VA panels. Good contrast when viewed head-on comes at the expense of poorer off‑axis performance. Most TVs with that panel have a similar problem and The One is no exception. The rotating stand helps a little by letting you angle the screen toward the viewer, but with widely spaced seats it won't solve the issue.

Daytime performance

7.1/10

6.1/10

Panel finish
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Average
Good

Panel brightness

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026): 502 cd/m2

Samsung QN900F: 723 cd/m2

One of the new features in 8K from Samsung is the matte display. The Koreans have been gradually "matting" their televisions this year, and it's fair to say that the QN900F is at the very top in this regard – reflections are suppressed better than in any other model on the market. Practically, this means that even in a brightly lit lounge, the image remains clear, and reflections virtually disappear from the screen. Of course, such a coating comes at a cost. Colours lose a bit of intensity, and black in bright light doesn't appear as deep as on glossy screens. But this is more of a detail than a real problem, because after all, the vibrancy of colours and depth of black matter most in the evening, with the lights off – and then this effect completely disappears.

Philips PQS9001 performs quite well for daytime viewing. The biggest advantage is a stable brightness of around 500 nits, regardless of how many bright elements appear on the screen. Even when watching winter sports or an all-white scene, the picture doesn't dim. In a typical living room that level is more than enough to comfortably watch TV without having to block out the windows.

The satin finish does a decent job of reducing reflections, though it doesn't remove them completely. A window opposite the screen will be visible and can be distracting, especially in darker scenes. Blacks hold up well in daylight, so the image doesn't become overly washed out. For everyday viewing it's therefore quite good, as long as the sun isn't shining directly on the screen.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-OSCPFDEUC-0090-1110.7, E2500007, BT-S
TPM267E_V167.002.054.151
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QN900F TV Panel details
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV Panel details
Review Samsung QN900F TV Panel details
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV Panel details

Samsung QN900F

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

TV features

7.2/10

7.6/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Titan OS
  • System performance
    Very good
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), IR (remote)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QN900F TV features
Review Samsung QN900F TV features
Review Samsung QN900F TV features
Review Samsung QN900F TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Television Features

QN900F has a lot to offer. In addition to standard connections and tuners, it also has many television-specific features. There’s teletext, a clear EPG, and even a PiP function, which is quite rare these days. The QN900F easily handles other devices using the included solar remote, which in a sense compensates for the lack of recording from the built-in antenna tuners.

Smart TV

When it comes to smart features, Samsung as usual provides plenty – there’s a large number of applications (though not all), and Tizen on the QN900F ran very smoothly. It’s also hard to find a better television for connecting external devices – AirPlay, Miracast, Chromecast – everything works flawlessly. An interesting feature is the Art Gallery mode, which – like in The Frame – allows you to display images on the screen when it’s off. With quite a thick, massive frame, the effect is really impressive – it looks like a digital painting on the wall and could leave a lasting impression. So, you could call the QN900F extravagantly The Frame Super Extra Pro 😉

Titan OS in this year’s The One shows that Philips has been working on its system. Compared with last year’s version, many little things and functions that didn’t work properly before have been fixed. Now we can easily use AirPlay, mirror a computer screen via Miracast, or do voice searches in Polish. The system itself runs decently, though it’s far from the fastest. The app library has also grown. It includes Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, CANAL+, Apple TV and YouTube. The selection is still smaller than on Google TV, but when using popular services Titan increasingly gives fewer reasons to complain.

Classic features also show an improvement in everyday convenience. You can connect Bluetooth headphones and listen through them at the same time as the TV speakers. There’s also a mode that turns off the screen and leaves only the audio. Recording to USB and picture-in-picture (PiP) are missing. What’s most disappointing is the remote. Despite backlit buttons, it still controls the TV via infrared, so you have to point it at the screen. The system has picked up a number of useful fixes, but that part of the user experience remains unchanged and can be irritating in everyday use.

Apps

9.3/10

7.2/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.6/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
No
6 Mpix
Yes
No
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the QN900F works really well. During testing, we didn’t notice any major issues with handling various audio and video formats – and you can check this for yourself in our file list. The only puzzle that arose was with the subtitles – we could only get those saved in .txt format to work, even though according to Samsung's information, the TV should support many more extensions. What could be the reason for this? It's hard to say. It’s possible that it’s just a temporary bug that will be fixed in one of the upcoming updates.

The built-in USB player runs quickly and smoothly and handles most of the files we tested without trouble. Music playback is solid, from common MP3s to FLAC files, including 96 kHz/24-bit. It's perfectly adequate for everyday media playback from a USB stick. However, our biggest complaint is again the handling of photos. The player is quite selective about resolution: it opened our 8, 16 and 32 Mpix files but failed with, among others, 4, 12 and 24 Mpix. It's hard to find any logic in that when a larger photo works but a smaller one doesn't. That can be annoying when browsing holiday photos.

Sound

8.2/10

6.9/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    96dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

The QN900F performs really nicely – as you’d expect from a premium television. The bass is quite strong but slightly muted. We wouldn’t compare it to top-tier audio systems, but for built-in speakers, it does the job. The high tones also stand out – quite clear and distinct, which is particularly helpful when watching films with a lot of dialogue. Unfortunately, Samsung still doesn’t support the DTS:X format in its televisions. This means that if we want to hear sound recorded in that standard, we need to connect an external home theatre system via an amplifier – the television alone simply won’t play it.

The Philips PQS9001 has a 2.0 audio system with a total power of 40 W, that is, two 10 W speakers on each side. It sounds fairly good and definitely better than most budget TVs. There's plenty of volume, but the sound itself lacks depth. The biggest issue is the lack of low end, so explosions in films or heavier sections of music don't have the proper weight.

High frequencies aren't reproduced evenly either. Measurements show a noticeable dip around 2 kHz, then a boost at 6-7 kHz and a drop above about 8 kHz. That can emphasise sibilance and add a bit of harshness to the sound, despite the rolled-off top end. It's fine for everyday viewing, but for films and music it's worth considering additional audio. All the more so because the TV supports spatial audio formats, including Dolby Atmos and DTS. A compatible soundbar or AV receiver will make better use of those formats than the built-in speakers.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

96dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy