Samsung QN85F vs Philips MLED920 / MLED910

Direct comparison

QN85F

MLED920 / MLED910

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.5

6.5

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    7.3

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    7.1

    6.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.7

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    8.6

    8.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.4

    4.0

  • Watching in bright light

    6.9

    5.5

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    5.5

  • Apps

    8.7

    6.7

  • Sound quality

    7.6

    6.2

Advantages

  • High HDR brightness (even 1700–1800 nits)

  • Very good contrast and deep blacks

  • 2 times the number of dimming zones compared to its predecessor (55")

  • 144 Hz panel supporting VRR and ALLM

  • Unique Game Motion Plus feature – a distinctive smoother for gaming

  • Low input lag

  • Satin finish on the panel works great during the day combined with high brightness

  • Advanced Tizen platform: with AirPlay, SmartThings, and a convenient solar remote

  • Well-designed stand. Hybrid – can be a central base or side legs

  • Solid sound with pleasant bass and Dolby Atmos support

  • Solid black and high contrast thanks to mini-LED backlighting

  • HDR brightness reaching 700–800 nits in real movie scenes

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Ambilight – an element that adds atmosphere, especially in the evening

  • A lot of supported audio formats: DTS:X, Dolby Atmos, Dolby True HD 7.1

  • 144 Hz panel with support for VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Loud sound (up to 88 dB)

  • Illuminated remote

Disadvantages

No like
  • No support for Dolby Vision and DTS:X

  • No recording function from built-in tuners and PiP

  • Issue with HEIC files in the player

  • No proper HGiG* support in game mode

*This seems to be an update bug that we hope Samsung will fix quickly. We're keeping an eye on the situation for you.

  • Titan OS is quite underdeveloped – there are significant errors and missing features in the applications

  • Few user-friendly features

  • Hybrid infrared remote

  • Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions in dark scenes

  • The television is not suitable (aside from gaming) for working with a PC – strong dithering and poor readability of fonts, especially coloured ones and on dark backgrounds

Our verdict

The Samsung QN85F is a television that perfectly demonstrates the purpose of the Neo QLED line. On one hand, it has everything that a modern user expects – high brightness, excellent fluidity, and full support for gamers. On the other, it’s still an LCD, so it’s a technology that comes with certain compromises. The question is whether these compromises actually hinder everyday use? In practice, it’s hard not to be impressed by how the QN85F performs with HDR movies. A brightness level of 1700–1800 nits makes watching dynamic scenes truly feel like experiencing the “HDR spark,” which many competitive televisions lack. The lighting effects in films or series can literally overwhelm with intensity, yet the television doesn’t lose detail and doesn’t turn the entire image into a washed-out blob. This is precisely the kind of spectacular experience that viewers investing in a new screen are searching for. Gamers also have reasons to be pleased. (Well, maybe apart from one shortcoming related to HGIG.) It supports 144 Hz, variable refresh rate VRR, and automatic game mode ALLM. This is already a must-have set in this class, but Samsung goes further by adding a unique feature called Game Motion Plus. Thanks to this, the image in games becomes smoother, resembling the operation of a motion smoother in films, but without a noticeable increase in latency. This solution truly sets the QN85F apart from the competition. On top of all this, there’s everyday convenience. The Tizen system is fast, stable, and full of apps that we actually use – from Netflix to Apple TV to YouTube and Disney+. There’s also AirPlay support, a comprehensive SmartThings platform, and a remote that, instead of being intimidating with dozens of buttons, offers simple navigation and quick access to the most important functions. This makes the QN85F a television that you just want to reach for every day. Sure, you can point out the shortcomings. There’s no Dolby Vision, no USB recording, and the viewing angles typical of a VA panel won't impress if you sit at a steep angle. But all of this pales in comparison to how versatile and refined the QN85F is. During the day, it handles bright rooms excellently, in the evening it delivers cinematic emotions in HDR, and in games, it provides smoothness and low input lag that other models could envy. Overall, the QN85F is a television that not only successfully continues the value-for-money tradition of its predecessor, the QN85D, but even expands it with several strong points. It’s equipment that’s hard to describe in any other way than as a “safe choice” – one that won’t disappoint in any scenario and is very likely to meet the expectations of even the most demanding users.

Philips MLED920 is a natural continuation of last year’s PML9000 model, but it’s not a rehash. It’s clear that the manufacturer has done their homework – primarily, the local dimming algorithms have been improved, which last year could really spoil the viewing experience. Now, black levels and contrast are definitely better, and combined with Dolby Vision here, even HDR content looks quite decent. The picture can sometimes shine where it should, and it doesn’t strain the eyes in more challenging scenes. Undoubtedly, the greatest asset of the MLED920 is its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided backlighting can give films and games a whole new atmosphere – it’s as if the screen is extending beyond its boundaries, and the whole room becomes part of the viewing experience. This is something that will be appreciated not only by movie buffs but also by gamers, who, in addition to the lights, get a full set of features typical of modern gaming TVs: 144 Hz, VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming. In this regard, Philips has a lot to offer. But. Well, there’s a big but – this is where we reach the most difficult part of this verdict – it’s still a dual-purpose device. On one hand, we have strong picture quality and the unique Ambilight feature, on the other, there are hardware limitations that are hard to ignore. Titan OS in its current form is a big hindrance, full of bugs and shortcomings that make the TV lag behind the competition. Added to this is the price, which is by no means low for the features offered. Therefore, it’s hard to recommend it unequivocally to everyone. However, if you’re looking for Philips' brightest screen at a reasonable price, with Ambilight, a full set of features for gamers, and basic apps – the MLED920 will be quite a good choice.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Silver
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment, Base adjustment
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7/10

7.9/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 240 (20 x 12)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 144 (12 x 12)

Contrast:

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

101,800:1

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

18,650:1

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

47,050:1

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

9,700:1

Review Samsung QN85F  Contrast and black detail

Result

4,350:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

298,900:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

38,500:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

23,950:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

16,850:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,000:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review Samsung QN85F Contrast and black detail
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail
Review Samsung QN85F Contrast and black detail
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Our editorial team received a 55-inch model with a VA panel. In the case of NeoQLEDs, which are TVs with Mini-LED backlighting, size is crucial because the larger the screen, the more local dimming zones it can have. This directly translates to higher contrast. In the version we tested, we counted as many as 240 dimming zones, which is twice as many as last year's QN85D. Theoretically, such an increase should deliver an equally impressive improvement in contrast. Unfortunately, practice showed otherwise – the QN85F delivers results very close to its predecessor. Yes, in some scenes with a lot of black or in areas where details in highlights are crucial, there is a noticeable improvement, but it is not proportional to the number of zones. The Mini-LED technology can be temperamental, and sometimes delicate halos appear around small, bright objects. This is a typical compromise that one must accept with such a solution. However, this doesn’t change the fact that the contrast in the QN85F is at a very high level and will easily satisfy most users, even the more demanding ones. However, we have the impression that Samsung could fine-tune the algorithms controlling the dimming because we know from experience that they can perform really well in other models.

Philips MLED920 in the 55-inch version that we had the opportunity to test uses a high-contrast VA panel. The panel itself is one thing, but the real standout feature of this model is the mini-LED backlighting. This largely determines how black and contrast look – and it must be said that Philips has taken a big step forward compared to the models from 2024, where the local dimming algorithms performed just average. In this new version, it is significantly better, and the contrast presented by the MLED920 can truly surprise in a positive way. At times, it even approaches the level known from the best LCD TVs on the market – blacks can be deep, the image gains a three-dimensional quality, and viewing experiences in a dark room leave a great impression. Of course, as with any mini-LED TV, this is not an image completely free of compromises. With a large number of small elements on the screen, the local dimming algorithms can sometimes get confused – at times dimming details more than we would like and other times brightening the background, resulting in slight, light blue halos around objects (the so-called halo effect). Despite these imperfections, we must emphasize that black and contrast are truly strengths of the Philips MLED920 and definitely one of the reasons to consider it in the mid-range segment.

HDR effect quality

6.9/10

5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 89.7%, Bt.2020: 69.8%
DCI P3: 89.9%, Bt.2020: 65.6%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

1248 nit

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

860 nit

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

1093 nit

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

465 nit

Review Samsung QN85F  Brightness measurement

Result

957 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

722 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

775 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

131 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

677 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review Samsung QN85F HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review Samsung QN85F HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review Samsung QN85F HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review Samsung QN85F HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

Philips MLED920 / MLED910

HDR luminance

Samsung QN85F

HDR luminance

Although more than twice the number of dimming zones compared to its predecessor did not result in a spectacular leap in black levels and contrast, we definitely felt it in the HDR effect itself. The QN85F is up to 50% brighter than last year's model and it makes a huge impression in dynamic scenes. Peak brightness can reach almost 1700–1800 nits, which is an impressively high result for this Mini-LED class. The best part is that almost regardless of the scene being watched, the HDR effect remains strong and vibrant. In four out of five test scenes, brightness was maintained around 1000 nits, a level that in most cases allows the viewer to feel the true magic of this format. Of course, in scene number 4 from the film Sicario 2, the limitations of Mini-LED technology become apparent – the brightness of the helicopter's subtle light drops to around 500 nits. This isn't an outstanding result, but it is still much more acceptable than last year's model. Samsung deserves applause for the dramatic improvement in brightness with the QN85F compared to its predecessor. However, there's a certain trend visible in this year's televisions – the manufacturer has worsened colour gamut coverage. Although the QN85F has a QLED panel, its result at around 90% DCI-P3 is average, and in the most demanding films, it may lead to less vibrant colours than its predecessor. Despite this drawback, the overall HDR effect is at an excellent level and truly makes a big impression in this class of devices.

Philips MLED920 in our measurements in static tests even reached around 900 nits, which for a mid-range model is quite an impressive result. In practice, this translates to a lot of satisfaction during viewing – in scenes rich in bright light, such as the first, third, or fifth test patterns, the screen was able to generate around 700 nits, which is sufficient to feel the real "HDR effect". However, it cannot be denied that the limited number of backlight zones and the typical mini-LED compromises in dimming algorithms reveal their flaws in more demanding scenes. In sequences with small light sources – like the moon or a scene from the film Sicario 2 – the television clearly prioritises maintaining deeper blacks at the expense of the brightness of these small elements. For most viewers, this is still a reasonable compromise, as the dark background looks much better, although it should be noted that the details themselves may not dazzle with intensity. The question of colours also leaves a bit to be desired. Although the employed PFS filter (the equivalent of quantum dots known from QLEDs) does its job and the colours appear quite vibrant, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour space reaches "only" 90%. In everyday viewing, this will be sufficient, but in extremely colourful productions – like the latest Disney animations – one can notice that some tones are not as vivid as they could be in other constructions.

Factory color reproduction

4.8/10

5/10

Review Samsung QN85F Factory color reproduction
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review Samsung QN85F Factory color reproduction
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Samsung QN85F offers several preset picture modes, but out of the box, the television starts in 'Eco' mode. We could almost end the discussion here, as using this setting on such a model makes little sense – the picture is washed out, unpleasant, and far from what we expect from a television of this class. Therefore, we conducted our tests in the best available mode, which is Filmmaker mode. Its purpose is to faithfully reproduce what the directors saw during filming, and indeed, it is the setting that performs best among all factory options. However, this doesn't mean it's free from flaws.

Both in SDR and HDR, the QN85F prominently highlighted warm colours. This was due to a lack of white balance, where the blue colour was noticeably absent. Additionally, the image was sometimes overexposed – both the gamma brightness characteristic and the EOTF curve indicated that the television has a tendency to blow out scenes. In SDR, colour reproduction errors (Delta E around 4–5) were still acceptable, but in HDR, the inaccuracies became quite significant and clearly deviated from what the creators intended to show us. Fortunately, Samsung provides a wide range of calibration tools in its televisions, so – as always – we proceeded with professional calibration to see how much could be improved.

Like every Philips TV we've tested, the MLED920 was primarily assessed in Filmmaker mode – the so-called "most honest" mode, designed for films and to faithfully convey the intentions of the creators. Indeed, in terms of colour accuracy, it performs best among all the modes available on the TV, but it is not without flaws. The first thing that stands out is the white balance. The image has a slight tendency towards purple-pink tones, giving it a somewhat unnatural character. However, an even bigger problem turned out to be what we mentioned earlier – image clipping. Just looking at the gamma or EOTF charts reveals that the line deviates significantly from the norm, dropping below a value of 1.8. In practice, this means "bleeding" of the brightest whites, where the image becomes almost milky. Fortunately, most of these issues can be corrected – the MLED920 responds to calibration, and with a few adjustments, image quality can be significantly improved.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.5/10

7.5/10

Review Samsung QN85F Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Color reproduction after calibration
Review Samsung QN85F Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Color reproduction after calibration

After calibrating the movie mode, we managed to tame the colours in both modes almost to perfection – most of them did not exceed an error value of 3, which is the threshold of perceivability by the human eye. The image became more natural, fuller, and at the same time free of the overexposure that was noticeable right after taking the television out of the box. This demonstrates the significant potential that lies within the QN85F and how well it responds to precise settings. However, this does not change the fact that certain technological barriers cannot be overcome. Despite the enormous benefits of calibration, there are still limitations to the panel itself. Although the number of dimming zones has doubled compared to its predecessor, the algorithms controlling the backlighting can manipulate brightness in their own way. Sometimes this leads to slight colour inaccuracies or subtly visible halo effects around bright objects. Nonetheless, the viewing experience after calibration is really enjoyable and shows how good a screen the QN85F can be if we just take a moment for the right settings.

After calibration, we managed to largely tame the white balance – to the extent that the average viewer will not be able to detect colour inaccuracies. The characteristic pink-purple glow that previously disrupted the naturalness of the image has also disappeared. The colour palette has been organised, and the colours appear more cohesive and neutral. The gamma in SDR content looks really good after calibration – there’s no sign of the earlier “bleeding” effect in bright scenes. The image has become more contrasty and free from the milky effect that previously severely affected the viewing experience. In the case of HDR content, the improvement is also noticeable, although here it is still evident that the television goes “its own way”. The EOTF curve cannot be fully adjusted, as Philips simply does not offer tools for precise control of this parameter in its settings. In many films, the television still exposes the image “in its own way”. Despite these limitations, calibration has brought a lot of good – the majority of colour inaccuracies have been minimised and the overall image balance has significantly improved. However, one must remember that certain barriers arise from the very hardware construction and simply cannot be overcome.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

6.5/10

Review Samsung QN85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung QN85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung QN85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Samsung QN85F Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions

Minor colour errors are often practically unnoticeable; it is the fluidity of tonal transitions that is a category that even a less experienced viewer will pay attention to. Unfortunate stripes and artificial lines can completely ruin the perception of the image. Fortunately, the QN85F handles this aspect almost perfectly. Gradients are smooth, transitions between colours are seamless, and no artificial lines or distinct boundaries separating hues appear on the screen. The image remains consistent, and nothing distracts our attention from the content. Only in very extreme conditions did we notice slight issues in the grey palette, but this is a flaw typical of most televisions and it's hard to consider it a serious drawback. In practice, while watching films, we encountered no problems.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the Philips MLED920 is not its strongest suit. In our tests, we quickly noticed that the television has noticeable issues in darker scenes – examples include segments from the film The Green Knight or test grey palettes. There, you can see characteristic banding of colours and too harsh transitions between shades, which can be quite noticeable in productions with a darker aesthetic. Fortunately, the situation looks better in brighter scenes – there, the image presents smoothly and without significant artifacts.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review Samsung QN85F Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review Samsung QN85F Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Although the native tonal transitions on the QN85F perform excellently with 4K content, we don't always have to deal with the highest resolution material. This is where how the TV handles upscaling and digital image processing becomes crucial. This process is managed by Samsung's proprietary processor – AI NQ4 Gen2. In practice, it works very effectively. If visible colour banding or other undesirable phenomena appear on the screen, for instance with content from YouTube, they can easily be smoothed out using the "noise reduction" feature. Set to medium, it improves tonal transitions while not overly blurring desired details. However, it should be noted that – like in most Samsung TVs – this feature heavily interferes with film grain. Therefore, during movie screenings, it’s wise to use it cautiously to avoid losing the natural character of the image.

The upscaling itself looks very good. Test materials in lower resolutions were displayed sharply and clearly, with a lot of details. The only drawback remains the issue with overscan, which cuts off the edges of the screen. In most situations, this isn't noticeable, but with very old materials below HD quality, there may be instances where a fragment of the image from the left side gets slightly cut off.

The manufacturer has equipped this model with several features that improve signal quality, and although we usually approach such “enhancers” with caution, here they prove to be really helpful. The key option is called “distortion reduction” – it works best at a medium level because, on one hand, it effectively smooths out unwanted steps and colour transitions, and on the other, it doesn’t excessively cut details, meaning the image still looks natural.

It’s a bit worse when it comes to upscaling. Lower quality materials – such as the test video with the model – appeared soft and lacking sharpness. Of course, it can be partially adjusted with the sharpness slider in the menu, but the result still falls short compared to what competitors offer at a similar price. Philips still needs to work on this aspect because, in light of the successful improvement of tonal transitions, the upscaling simply comes off weak.

Blur and motion smoothness

7/10

7.7/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
68%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Smużenie (4K@144Hz):

Smużenie (4K@144Hz):

Motion blur and fluidity of movement in the QN85F is a topic worth discussing further because the TV is equipped not with a standard 120 Hz panel but with a 144 Hz one. The extra hertz will mainly be appreciated by PC gamers, but the very fact of having such an option can be seen as a nice addition and a sign of the times – it's hard to complain about the trend of faster panels since in practice, each of us would like the picture to be as smooth as possible. However, the most important thing is how the TV performs with typical 120 Hz refresh rates – in the case of consoles, sports, or films recorded at 24 or 30 frames per second. And here, the QN85F performs really well. In films, you can easily adjust the character of the picture thanks to the "image clarity" feature, where you'll find two control sliders. Key in the case of screenings is the one responsible for reducing motion judder. Lower values give the image a more cinematic character with preserved "frame-ness," while higher values lead to strong smoothing, reminiscent of television theatre.

Philips MLED920 features a 144 Hz panel, which immediately suggests that we shouldn’t complain about motion smoothness. And indeed – for a VA panel, the motion blur is relatively low here, and while you can sometimes notice slight issues on darker backgrounds, they’re not something that will catch the eye of most people during regular viewing.

A big plus is also the presence of a motion smoother called “Motion Style.” It allows you to adjust the smoothness to your own preferences – if someone prefers a more “theatrical,” almost television-like character of the image, they can increase the sliders, and if they want to maintain the natural “judders” of a cinematic frame, they just need to set lower values. This way, everyone can find a happy medium.

Console compatibility and gaming features

8.2/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The Samsung QN85F makes a fantastic impression from a gamer’s perspective. It features four HDMI 2.1 ports, so we can easily connect multiple devices at the same time. There’s also Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) to prevent screen tearing, as well as Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM), which allows the TV to automatically switch to the appropriate settings when we start the console. Additionally, it supports refresh rates of up to 144 Hz – something that PC gamers will particularly appreciate, but the mere fact that this option is available shows that Samsung is committed to full support for gamers. The Game Bar panel also deserves praise. It provides a quick overview of key parameters – from frame rates to refresh mode, and even shortcuts to picture settings. Instead of sifting through the entire menu, everything is at our fingertips, which proves to be really convenient in practice. However, the most interesting addition is the Game Motion Plus feature. It’s essentially a motion smoothing function, brought into the gaming world. When activated, the picture becomes smoother, sometimes it even looks like we’ve gotten a few extra frames, and importantly – the response delay doesn’t increase enough to hinder gameplay. This solution truly sets Samsung’s 120Hz TVs apart from the competition.

The only serious downside remains the lack of proper HGiG support. This standard is responsible for accurate tone mapping in HDR games, which ensures that brightness and contrast are displayed according to how creators intended. Without HGiG, we have to manually adjust brightness, which doesn’t always yield perfect results. The feature was available in previous models, but it disappeared from the QN85F after one of the updates. We hope that Samsung will quickly rectify this issue, and we will be keeping an eye on whether they succeed.

For gamers, the Philips MLED920 is truly a complete tool. The manufacturer has taken care of everything that is now considered standard in televisions for consoles and PCs. It has ALLM, so the console automatically switches the screen to game mode, there’s VRR and a 144 Hz refresh rate that ensures smooth gameplay even in fast-paced titles. All key HDR formats are supported – including HGiG and Dolby Vision Gaming for Xbox – which means that regardless of what you’re playing and on which console, the television will be able to extract the maximum potential from the image. In everyday gaming, the Game Bar proves useful too – a relatively simple implementation by Philips, but a functional panel where you can quickly check image parameters, enable VRR, or adjust details without leaving the game. It’s not as elaborate as the competition, but it does its job without any complaints. And finally, something that sets Philips apart from the competition – Ambilight. The three-sided LED backlighting can make a huge impression in games, especially in the evening. It’s also a way to slightly 'expand' the screen and create a greater sense of immersion. And since coloured LEDs have recently become almost an essential element of a gamer’s room, the MLED920 fits perfectly into this trend.

Input lag

9.8/10

9.6/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
18 ms
1080p120
9 ms
9 ms
2160p60
16 ms
17 ms
2160p120
9 ms
9 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
17 ms
2160p120
12 ms
9 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
35 ms
2160p120 DV
9 ms

The input lag in the QN85F is exceptionally high. With content at 120 or 144 Hz, the values often hovered below 10 ms, which is an outstanding result. Naturally, when playing at 60 Hz, the lag doubles, but it still remains low enough to be practically unnoticeable. This makes the QN85F suitable for both dynamic e-sports games and more relaxed console titles.

The input lag on the Philips MLED920 is really very good – in 120 Hz mode, we measured values below 10 ms, which places this model among the absolute top of LCD TVs in terms of responsiveness. Even at 60 Hz, a result of around 18 ms is fully acceptable and won't interfere with any type of gameplay. One exception is the Dolby Vision mode at 60 frames, where the latency can increase to as much as 35 ms. This is a result that may be a bit glaring for esports players, but it must be stated honestly – for most so-called "casual gamers," it will be absolutely imperceptible. Especially since we're talking about values that still allow for comfortable gaming without major compromises.

Compatibility with PC

8.4/10

4/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
9ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes
Review Samsung QN85F Compatibility with PC
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Compatibility with PC

The QN85F performs really well in terms of collaboration with computers. Thanks to the PC mode with a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz, support for G-Sync, and low input lag, gaming on a personal computer is very enjoyable and should not cause frustration even for more demanding gamers. The readability of the fonts is also good – the TV supports 4:4:4 chroma, so standard texts look sharp and clear. The problem only arises with very thin letters. Regardless of the refresh rate setting – whether it’s 144, 120, or 60 Hz – horizontal, thin lines were poorly visible. Reducing the refresh rate slightly improved the situation, but never to the point where one could say they were displayed perfectly.

When it comes to working with a PC, the Philips MLED920 evokes quite mixed feelings. On one hand, it looks impressive on paper – we have 144 Hz, support for G-Sync and FreeSync, so in terms of gaming on PC, the TV does not disappoint. Anyone looking for a large screen for computer games gets a solid package of features here. However, when we try to use it as a typical monitor for everyday work, its limitations quickly become apparent. The fonts do not look the best – there is noticeable strong dithering, coloured letters can be jagged, and with very dark text, there are even strange anomalies, as if the panel is losing thin lines and having trouble reproducing them correctly. In short: For PC gaming, yes. For any work and reading text: a definite no.

Viewing angles

3.2/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
73%
68%

The viewing angles on the QN85F are the classic Achilles' heel of most LCD TVs with VA panels. When looking at the screen from an angle, the drop in brightness becomes apparent quite quickly, with whites starting to grey and colours losing their intensity. This is the price to pay for the high contrast that this technology offers. Samsung could have opted for a better coating to enhance viewing angles in this model, but it is not present here. In practice, this means that the best viewing experience will be obtained when sitting directly in front of the television, and any significant deviation will result in a noticeable loss of picture quality.

The viewing angles on the MLED920 are classic for VA type panels – even a slight tilt from the centre causes the image to start losing colours, contrast weakens, and the overall picture becomes quite flat and less appealing. There are no miracles here. So if you’re watching films with a larger group and everyone is sitting a bit to the side, this will be slightly noticeable. On the other hand, you get what you pay for: thanks to this panel, the MLED920 can display a much deeper black than TVs with IPS panels.

Daytime performance

6.9/10

5.5/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good
Review Samsung QN85F Daytime performance
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Daytime performance
Review Samsung QN85F Daytime performance
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips MLED920 / MLED910: 421 cd/m2

Samsung QN85F : 690 cd/m2

QN85F performs exceptionally well during the day. The satin finish of the screen combined with high brightness makes it a television designed for bright rooms. Colours do not lose their intensity, and the image does not wash out even when a lot of light floods in. The television itself is bright enough to handle a lounge with large windows facing south. Therefore, the QN85F gives us an image that allows us to watch movies or matches during the day without annoying reflections and the feeling that the picture disappears in the sunlight.

Philips MLED920 performs quite well in everyday use. The satin finish on the panel effectively reduces reflections, and in most moderately sunny living rooms, it manages unwanted glare quite well. However, it's important to remember that this is not a TV that dazzles with brightness – the average value in SDR hovers around 450 nits. In very bright rooms, particularly with large south-facing windows, the screen doesn't always stand up to the intense daylight. In such situations, it's worth supporting it with even light curtains, so viewing comfort doesn't suffer too much.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-PTMFDEUC-0090-1126.0, E2540300, BT-S
TPN258E_V058.002.179.041
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QN85F TV Panel details
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV Panel details
Review Samsung QN85F TV Panel details
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV Panel details

Samsung QN85F

Philips MLED920 / MLED910

TV features

7.3/10

5.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QN85F  TV features
Review Samsung QN85F TV features
Review Samsung QN85F  TV features
Review Samsung QN85F TV features
Review Samsung QN85F  TV features
Review Samsung QN85F TV features
Review Samsung QN85F  TV features
Review Samsung QN85F TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features

Smart TV and Tizen System

Samsung QN85F runs on its proprietary operating system Tizen, which has long been one of the strongest points of the Korean manufacturer. The platform operates quickly, is well-developed and provides access to virtually all the necessary applications. Here we have AirPlay support, screen mirroring, voice search, and a very clear interface. Everything is controlled by a remote with a minimal number of buttons, designed to give us quick access to the most important applications.

Classic TV Features

When it comes to classic television features, the QN85F offers a rather basic set. The EPG interface is clear and easy to use, resembling a traditional teletext programme list. A downside is the lack of USB recording and the absence of PiP functionality, which Samsung has offered in many other models. This is because the QN85F uses single tuners. For some people, this may be a disadvantage, but considering how few viewers today use traditional linear television, it won’t matter much to most users.

SmartThings and Device Support

A strong element of the entire platform is the SmartThings app. Thanks to it, we can integrate the TV with other smart home devices – not just those from Samsung. We can connect smart lighting like Philips Hue or Yeelight, video intercoms, and many other devices to the system. SmartThings also allows us to control the TV without using a traditional remote – we can use the app on our smartphone, mouse mode, or gesture control if we have a Samsung watch. This makes the QN85F a part of a larger ecosystem and fits perfectly into the trend of smart IoT homes.

Smart TV – Titan OS

Philips MLED920 uses the proprietary Titan OS, which is just starting its adventure in the TV market and unfortunately, this is evident at every turn. On one hand, we have basic features – such as AirPlay support or the ability to mirror content from a smartphone, but on the other hand, its limitations quickly become apparent. Screen mirroring works only with a phone, but not with a laptop. Voice search? Yes, but it only works with Amazon Alexa and in languages supported by this assistant. The system operates fairly quickly, but every now and then it can "fail" and gives the impression of something that is underdeveloped and still evolving.

Classic TV Functions

Titan OS also doesn't excel in terms of classic TV functions. Aside from the hybrid remote with a numeric keypad – which is indeed backlit and thoughtfully designed in two modes, it unfortunately operates on infrared – there’s nothing here that would truly set the MLED920 apart from the competition. There’s a lack of USB recording or a PiP function, and such solutions could be useful in this class. From unusual additions, we have an analog output in the form of a jack, which allows for connecting headphones or older speakers. It’s a small nod to users who still use older equipment.

Ambilight TV

What definitely draws attention away from the shortcomings of Titan OS is the unique, three-sided Ambilight system. Here, Philips still plays in its own league and can impress those who haven't experienced this feature before. The colour backlighting that reacts to the content on the screen adds a unique atmosphere to viewing sessions and is something that the competition does not offer in a similar form. It is precisely Ambilight that is meant to ensure that other shortcomings – both system-related and functional – take a back seat.

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

8.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The player in the QN85F works as most people expect, supporting practically all popular formats and is comfortably sufficient even for more demanding users. Movies, music, photos – everything runs without any issues. The only hiccup occurs with HEIC files, which are photos from Apple devices. According to the specifications, they should work, but in practice, they simply do not open. Thumbnails are visible, but the file itself refuses to launch. This looks like a common software bug. Aside from that one case, the player performs correctly and gives no reasons for complaints.

The built-in player in the Philips MLED920 works quite well and handles most popular audio and video files without any major issues – just as you can see in our test table. So there’s no worry about typical movie or music formats. The only complaint we can have is regarding its rather selective support for photo formats and some resolutions.

Apps

8.7/10

6.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

7.6/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    84dB
    88dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

The Samsung QN85F is equipped with a 2.2 system with a power output of 40 W, and it performs really well for built-in speakers. The bass is pleasant, and the dialogue is clear and easy to hear even during louder scenes. Even at maximum volume, the TV doesn't experience any unwanted vibrations, and nothing rattles. At the bottom of the cabinet, there is a woofer responsible for the bass – therefore, when installing, it's important to ensure it isn't obstructed.

As for formats, the QN85F does not support DTS:X audio, which for Samsung has been a standard for several years now and forces Blu-ray enthusiasts to connect audio devices first to the home theatre system and then to the TV. However, in return, we get support for the more popular Dolby Atmos format, which can add extra depth to the sound of movies and series.

The sound in the Philips MLED920 is probably not the element that will impress you the most. It sounds fairly flat, lacking depth and clearer bass, which means movies or concerts don't have that extra layer of immersion that a better audio system can provide. However, it must be said that the volume is at a really decent level – the TV can ramp up to even 88 decibels. A big plus of the MLED920 is not so much the sound quality itself, but the support for audio formats. Philips has ensured compatibility with virtually all the major standards, including Dolby Atmos, DTS, and Dolby TrueHD 7.1. This means that if someone decides to connect an external soundbar or amplifier, they won't encounter any limitations and will be able to enjoy the full cinema sound.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

88dBC (Max)

75dBC