Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D vs Xiaomi S Pro 2026

Direct comparison

Q70D / Q74D / Q77D

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.8

7.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.1

    6.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.0

    6.2

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.5

    6.3

  • Gaming on console

    8.7

    7.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.0

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    5.4

    7.4

  • Utility functions

    7.4

    7.2

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    6.3

    7.1

Advantages

  • Excellent performance with consoles and computers

  • Colour reproduction after the calibration process

  • Very good performance in sports - advanced motion smoothing system

  • Smooth and trouble-free operation of the Tizen system

  • Very good tonal transition quality within this budget

  • Good black and contrast (SDR)

  • Very high peak brightness (great for a bright lounge)

  • Complete package for gamers (144 Hz panel, HDMI 2.1, VRR)

  • Extremely low input lag in SDR mode (below 10 ms)

  • Surprisingly good, strong sound (branded by Harman Kardon)

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS:X

  • Rich Google TV system (with AirPlay and Chromecast)

  • Proper compatibility with PC (clear fonts and 288Hz mode)

  • Excellent price-to-specification ratio

Disadvantages

No like
  • Possible noticeable light leaks

  • No Dolby Vision support

  • Local dimming algorithms practically don't work in HDR content

  • Useless Dolby Vision Gaming mode (input lag approx. 100 ms)

  • Poorly implemented HGiG mode

  • Strongly visible banding (colour stepping) in dark scenes

  • Very weak upscaling and digital image processing

  • Google TV system can "lag behind"

Our verdict

Samsung Q70D performed in the test exactly as it should for its price range – very competently. The strongest aspects of the television are certainly its performance when using a console and colour reproduction after the calibration process. The former will undoubtedly catch the attention of gamers with a range of conveniences that Samsung Q70D can offer, and there are quite a few, including that which is almost exclusive to the manufacturer's units – the ability to smooth out gameplay while still maintaining reasonable input lag, allowing titles running at 30 fps to perform like those at native 60 frames per second. In the context of gaming, one cannot forget the well-implemented HGIG mode, which, when set correctly, is on par with games using Dolby Vision. We must also acknowledge the easy pairing of the television with the Canal+ decoder, which is not such an obvious advantage, but we know that many people experience issues with this. Staying on the topic of television, it must be noted that the Samsung Q70D offers very good brightness in SDR content for its price range, making daytime viewing more than comfortable. A downside for the tested television is the lack of Dolby Vision, which would have significantly enhanced performance at the maximum brightness of the Samsung Q70D. The device's construction flaws should not be overlooked, as they may (though not necessarily) lead to light bleed that can be noticed in dark situations during dimly lit scenes. What cannot be taken away from the Samsung Q70D is the fact that it features one of the better motion smoothers in its price bracket, which works excellently for sports events or fast-paced action scenes. The system responsible for the television's operation runs very smoothly, and the only thing we can criticise it for is the absence of the Tidal app. In summary, the Samsung Q70D represents a good continuation of the manufacturer's seventh series, which year after year is gaining – firstly, in quality, and secondly, in popularity.

Is it worth buying the Xiaomi S Pro 2026? The answer to this question is quite complicated. Let's start with what is really great about this TV. First of all, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 has an outstanding price-to-performance ratio. It features a Mini LED panel with very high brightness, which performs excellently in a sunlit living room. Additionally, it has a fast 144 Hz (or even 288 Hz) panel and a full gaming package: two HDMI 2.1 ports, support for VRR, and impressively low input lag (below 10 ms). If you mainly watch 'regular' content and play games, this is a fantastic screen. Even the built-in 30W speakers are surprisingly good and support Dolby Atmos. Unfortunately, there is also a second, very problematic side to this model. In short: the software. We have the impression that Xiaomi has given us great 'parts', but hasn't managed to make them work together properly. The biggest issue is the HDR mode – the main reason why people buy TVs today. For unknown reasons, the TV in HDR mode (HDR10, Dolby Vision) does not manage its dimming zones well. As a result, blacks that should be deep become grey or navy blue, like in a regular LCD TV. On top of that, there are other software issues such as the terrible implementation of HGiG or the fact that the Dolby Vision mode for gamers is unusable due to immense input lag (100 ms). Additionally, the TV's capability to process image digitally is very poor. So how can we summarise this in terms of price? In its price range, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 crushes the competition in terms of specifications. Other TVs for this money are usually basic LCD models without dimming, and often only have a 60 Hz panel. The question then is: what is more important to you? If you're simply looking for a very bright and affordable TV for watching during the day and gaming, and you're willing to calibrate it – you will be very pleased with it. However, if you're looking for a TV to enjoy impressive HDR in movies and games straight out of the box, you will be terribly disappointed with this model. In that case, in our opinion, it's better to pay a bit more for a basic OLED TV or a more refined Mini-LED model from the competition.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.4/10

7.4/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 532 (28 x 19)

Contrast:

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

2,450:1

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

6,550:1

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

5,850:1

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Contrast and black detail

Result

2,800:1

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

1,001,650:1

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

52,600:1

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

17,900:1

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

17,200:1

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Contrast and black detail

Result

10,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Samsung Q70D and its related models, such as Q77D and Q74D, use a VA panel, which should inherently provide decent contrast. Typically, it is several times higher than that of IPS/ADS screens that do not come equipped with an advanced local dimming system. As you can see, contrast results are quite varied, which is caused by the unevenness of the panel. Therefore, we might sometimes get good contrast, and other times it can be significantly worsened, but generally, it remains fairly consistent, aside from light bleed. Let’s take a look at the film scenes we prepared from "Oblivion" and "Revenant." As we can see, in the first one, the lights are well separated, which is a positive phenomenon, as the visibility of details in bright areas in further tests should be equally good. What stands out the most here is the unusual oversharpening of the smoke visible under the light and the navy black in the background. In the frame from the second film, the first thing that stands out is the unevenness of the backlighting of our piece. This was significant and strongly affected the perceived image. Nonetheless, the details in the film were well visible.

Let's get to the point, which is what’s most important in the Mini LED panel: blacks and contrast. The Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is built on a VA matrix, which right off the bat promises deep blacks. On top of that, it features Mini LED backlighting with a very large number of local dimming zones. In the 65-inch variant we tested, we counted as many as 532. That’s a solid figure that should provide precise control over the backlighting. It should be noted that this number is proportional to size – opting for the smaller 55-inch variant will have fewer zones, while larger models will have more.

So, how does the black level perform on the S Pro 2026? The answer is complex.

Overall, it’s really not bad, and we see a clear improvement compared to the problematic model from 2025. As you can see on our measurement charts, the results are occasionally spectacular. In the majority of the film scenes we measured in SDR (standard dynamic range), the contrast could easily be called very good and even comparable to constructions three times more expensive. Well, it could be... and this brings us to the paradox of this model. The problem is how the television manages zones in scenarios other than SDR. As soon as we feed the TV a higher-quality signal, such as an HDR series or Dolby Vision from streaming platforms (Netflix, HBO Max, or Disney+), something strange happens. We have an irresistible impression that the TV suddenly... forgets it was equipped with local dimming zones at all. As shown in our video below, black levels in such scenes resemble more dark gray or navy shades. To this is added a slight flickering of the entire screen. This is a level we would expect from televisions completely lacking local dimming systems. It seems that Xiaomi, over the course of a year, chose to fix one key issue from last year’s 2025 model. And they succeeded – there’s no more annoying “zone disco”, the image is stable. It’s just a shame that when consuming high-quality content (HDR), this entire advanced system becomes completely useless.

HDR effect quality

5.5/10

6.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 92.2%, Bt.2020: 68.7%
DCI P3: 93.6%, Bt.2020: 70.9%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

433 nit

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

461 nit

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

477 nit

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

475 nit

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D Brightness measurement

Result

490 nit

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

809 nit

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

526 nit

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

1033 nit

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

469 nit

Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 Brightness measurement

Result

718 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Xiaomi S Pro 2026

Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D

Luminance of RGB colors

The brightness that the Samsung Q70D can offer is at a rather average level, although it cannot be said that the HDR effect will not be noticeable. Any brightness above 400 nits allows for a clear distinction between SDR and HDR content. As was the case in the paragraph about contrast and black levels, we can also observe here that the first scene, featuring a bright sunny sky and a darker foreground, has the lowest luminance of those measured. The result, which can be considered very good for this price range and display class, is that one. In a scene where we see a large light source filling a significant portion of the frame, the brightness of the TV is at its highest, reaching nearly 500 nits. However, it is worth noting the rather low coverage of the wide DCI-P3 colour gamut, which sometimes results in noticeable shortcomings in the colour reproduction. Additionally, users can enjoy rich colours and high precision in rendering shades, making movie screenings a unique experience. It is also worth mentioning that the Q70D Samsung panel performs excellently in eliminating blur during dynamic action scenes, which enhances the viewing comfort of sports broadcasts or games.

When it comes to HDR quality, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is undoubtedly a very bright television. On our synthetic measurement patterns, we were able to achieve peak brightness of around 1400 nits. This result is not only very good but quite spectacular, considering the price of this model. However, as we always say, our editorial team values measurements and the viewing experience of content that people watch on a daily basis – from movies to series. So let’s analyse how Xiaomi performs with film material. The result is, unfortunately, quite mixed. When very bright scenes appear on screen, the S Pro 2026 truly shows its full capabilities and can achieve a real 800-1000 nits on bright elements. Moreover, even smaller objects can "burn" the eyes – in scenes from the movie Sicario 2, small metallic parts of the helicopter were really vivid. The problem is – and here the story comes full circle, returning to our contrast assessment – that in such scenes, we can’t count on absolutely cinematic black. In our opinion, this compromise is too significant; the high visibility of details in bright sections should not come at the expense of such a substantial drop in blacks. And even though the HDR effect can create a stunning impression here, it’s important to remember that when very challenging, mixed scenes appear on screen, we may feel a slight disappointment. Precisely the one we mentioned in the previous paragraph regarding issues with dimming in HDR mode. As a consolation, it’s worth adding that the S Pro 2026 is equipped with an additional PFS filter (similar in function to a QLED layer), which effectively broadens the colour gamut coverage. As a result, measurements showed DCI-P3 coverage reaching 94%. This gives us confidence that in most colourful scenes, the image will look rich and properly saturated.

Factory color reproduction

6.1/10

4.1/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode in Samsung Q70D is "Filmmaker," and it was this mode that we used during all our tests. Before the calibration process, it had several flaws that effectively hindered the presentation of the director's intentions. In both SDR and HDR material, the white balance was dominated by red and green colours. As a result, there was a characteristic yellow tint on the image, which caused whites to appear yellowed and skin tones to be noticeably too warm. The reduced gamma in standard colour palette materials caused a significant drop in contrast, which was already not the highest. This led to the highlighting of details in the blacks, but also to clipping in brighter scenes. In this case, the EOTF curve proved to be much better and only brightened those scenes with quite low luminance. This was clearly visible in the section where we measured the maximum brightness of the television in HDR materials. At that time, a shot from the film "Billy Lynn" appeared unnaturally bright and lacking depth.

Of course, all our measurements were conducted in "Film" mode, which is typically the best and most faithful choice we get straight after taking the TV out of the box. And to put it bluntly: while this is the best mode, it is still very far from perfect. Above all, the TV has a clear tendency to give the picture a cool, blueish tint – this is due to poorly set colour balance. Additionally, there is the issue of how the S Pro 2026 manages its brightness straight out of the box, which results in an over-saturated image. These two flaws contribute to really significant colourimetric errors (Delta E). In HDR content, they could double exceed our expected error scale of "10" (i.e. reaching values close to 20). Just to remind you – the threshold of perceivable error by the human eye is a Delta E value of around 3. Results at the level of 20 mean that the image significantly deviates from what the director intended.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.1/10

7.2/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Fortunately, Samsung provides a wide range of calibration tools in all its TVs, including 2- and 20-point grey scale adjustments and advanced CMS. As a result, we were able to significantly improve the quality of SDR and HDR content. The vast majority of errors have been corrected, and the image that the Samsung Q70D now delivers is definitely much closer to the reference. Higher deltaE errors in wide dynamic range content primarily result from the display's insufficient luminance.

So how does the S Pro 2026 perform after our calibration process? We must admit that after calibration, the TV becomes a really enjoyable device for watching everyday content. As you can see in the charts, in HD (SDR) material, both white balance and gamma values have been brought to nearly perfection. Most importantly, colourimetric errors have become practically invisible to the human eye. In this scenario, the S Pro 2026 is simply a great TV that, after professional calibration, can provide a lot of joy from viewing. However, it is worth noting clearly – our efforts did little to help in 4K HDR mode. Despite the calibration, the TV still interprets the image quite strongly in its "own way," which is clearly evident in the measurement of the EOTF curve (brightness tracking). It's a bit of a shame because it shows that the problem lies not with the panel itself, but with the software. Poorly refined image management algorithms in HDR content can, unfortunately, rule this TV out for many more discerning users.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.9/10

6.9/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Considering how important lighting is in films and series, the overlapping structures and fluidity of tonal transitions constitute an extremely significant element in assessing image quality. The colour grading on the tested television is at quite a decent level. It cannot be said that it is outstanding, but it is not bad either. We assess it as acceptable. Brighter scenes perform best here, demonstrating the least amount of choppiness. In scenes recorded in darker settings, slight shortcomings in grading can already be noticeable, although it is not an issue that would cause discomfort while watching. This may be disturbed by the leaking backlight, which is clearly visible in the last image.

Now, let’s move on to the analysis of tonal transitions, which refers to the fluidity with which the television can render transitions between closely related shades. In the case of the Xiaomi S Pro 2026, the image that emerges is extremely dualistic. On one hand, we have bright gradations. When scenes with a blue sky or other smooth transitions appear in the bright parts of the image, the S Pro 2026 handles them excellently. They look perfectly smooth, without any visible artifacts.

Unfortunately, the situation changes dramatically as soon as dark scenes take over the screen. To put it bluntly – they look really poor. Instead of a smooth tonal transition in the darkness, the screen clearly shows colour banding and unsightly "stepping" of gradients. This is very noticeable in darker films or games and can effectively ruin the viewing experience.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7/10

4.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The function responsible for improving gradation is named "Noise Reduction" in the menu. As we have confirmed, it is worth enabling as it has a beneficial impact on tonal transitions. More importantly, it does not negatively affect film grain or fine details, which sometimes the competition "offers" us.

The image scaling on Samsung Q70D should be rated as average. The manufacturer does not aim to artificially sharpen the image, but rather to keep it naturally softened.

Let's start with the issue we raised in the previous paragraph: can a TV even fix the problem of terrible tonal transitions in dark scenes? Theoretically yes – in the menu, we find a feature with the promising name "Colour Contour Removal." Well, "theoretically." Unfortunately, in practice, this setting – regardless of which of the three power levels is chosen – yielded absolutely no real results. So we are dealing with a feature that practically only exists in the menu. Moving on to the quality of upscaling (scaling from a lower resolution to 4K), unfortunately, we have more bad news for you. The S Pro 2026 handles this task very poorly. Interestingly, the phenomenon of "overscan" (slight image cropping) is not a major issue here. The problem is that the TV simply shows a very raw, unprocessed image. Its attempt to boost the signal to a higher resolution looks simply dull and lacks any "intelligent" enhancement. There's no denying it – the entire digital image processing is the true Achilles' heel of this model.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.4/10

7.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
120Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
30%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (1080p@288Hz):

Samsung Q70D is the first model in the manufacturer's portfolio with a 120Hz panel. As a result, its motion smoothing features are more advanced than those in lower-tier models. In the menu, we find three functions responsible for improving fluidity. They are "Blur Reduction," "Judder Reduction," and "Clear Motion (LED)." We'll discuss the third one later. The first function enhances sharpness in motion, while the second adjusts the level of smoothing. The smoothness enhancer in Samsung Q70D works satisfactorily, and each setting makes a noticeable difference. Therefore, those who dislike the characteristic stuttering of films or who passionately watch sports will be able to achieve their preferred level of smoothness. In the image, we present a setting with slight smoothing, without the soap opera effect.

The panel used in Samsung Q70D has a fairly good response time for this type of display. Of course, it won't deliver an image as sharp as a proverbial razor, but at this price point, it is a recommended choice for all kinds of sports.

On paper, the specifications of the S Pro 2026 look impressive. The television is equipped with a native 144 Hz panel, capable of displaying images at up to 288 Hz in a dedicated gaming mode. These are incredible results, but what we were most interested in, in the context of everyday use, was how the TV handles motion blur and how the picture looks at 120 Hz. After all, this is the frequency used today by consoles such as the PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X/S, and it is desirable for sports fans. Generally, the panel "holds up". The matrix is quick enough to meet these challenges, and objects displayed at a native smoothness of 120 Hz are rendered correctly. When it comes to software, the TV is equipped with motion smoothing technology, but with a key caveat – it only works for input signals up to 60 Hz. This means it's mainly suitable for traditional TV, movies, and series. With it, we can adjust the smoothness of the picture to our own preferences – ranging from a very smooth, "theatrical" approach, to setting the slider at "zero" and maintaining a fully cinematic character.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.5/10

8.2/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 120Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The tested television is equipped with four HDMI 2.1 ports. Interestingly, all of them have a bandwidth of 40 Gbps; however, during the testing process, we did not observe any negative effects associated with this situation. More importantly, Samsung Q70D supports all features stemming from the aforementioned standard. This news will surely delight all gamers, as it means that whether using a console or a PC, we can expect the highest possible comfort during gameplay. Given the standard absence of Dolby Vision HDR for this manufacturer, it is significant that the HGIG mode has been implemented correctly and there are no issues with setting up the calibration chessboard. We particularly note that Samsung is the only manufacturer to allow gaming with the smoothness enhancer switched on, without significant degradation. This means that titles running at 30 fps will be perceived like those with native 60 frames per second.

Samsung, as one of the first manufacturers, introduced the Game Bar to its televisions, which has since been consistently refined. It contains all the necessary information regarding gameplay parameters that we can change "on the fly".

In summary: Samsung Q70D will perform excellently both with consoles and with computers. All functions worked brilliantly, and there were no issues with them. The ability to enable the smoothness enhancer without significant increases in input lag is a true gamechanger.

For gamers, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is on paper an almost perfect proposition. It has been equipped with two HDMI 2.1 ports, which allow us to unlock (although these options are somewhat hidden in the menu) the full suite of features: ALLM, VRR, and, crucially, the ability to operate in 4K at 144 Hz. This last feature should particularly please owners of powerful PCs. The TV also has something resembling a gamer panel – and while it’s hard to call it a full-fledged "Gamebar," it does its job by displaying key information. It’s just a shame that in its default form, it covers a relatively large part of the screen.

The biggest problem we have with this model, however, concerns how the S Pro 2026 handles games in HDR mode. To put it bluntly: it doesn’t handle it well. Due to the poorly implemented HGiG feature (the HDR tone mapping standard for games), during the initial HDR calibration on the console, it’s very easy to "blow out" the image. If someone is unaware of this software flaw and follows the on-screen instructions, they will simply set the picture incorrectly, with burnt-out details in bright areas. Another significant issue is the Dolby Vision mode for games. While it works, it generates such a high input lag that it becomes noticeable in dynamic titles. (You can check all our lag measurements in the paragraph below). In summary: Generally, this is a really very good screen for gamers, but with one small caveat. We would rather avoid HDR mode on it – unless we decide to manually set the brightness slider on the console "by eye," completely ignoring the tips from the console's pictogram.

Input lag

10/10

8.5/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
17 ms
1080p120
7 ms
8 ms
2160p60
13 ms
17 ms
2160p120
7 ms
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
17 ms
2160p120
7 ms
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
110 ms
2160p120 DV
77 ms

Results of latency on the Samsung Q70D are at a high level, regardless of the signal or resolution. All gamers will certainly appreciate the manufacturer's efforts, which allow a game running in 4K 120 Hz with HDR to have only 7 ms of latency, which is practically unnoticeable even in online gaming. It's worth adding that lag with the motion smoother turned on roughly doubles, which still means very comfortable gaming in this case.

We’re moving on to one of the most important measurements for gamers, which is signal delay (input lag). Overall, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 performs excellently here. Generally, in game mode, the lag is very low. With 120 Hz content (from consoles or PC), we easily achieved results below 10 ms. These are truly outstanding results and, in practice, absolutely unnoticeable for most people, even those who are very sensitive. Unfortunately, there is one "but," which constitutes the biggest drawback of this model for gaming. We're talking about Dolby Vision Gaming mode. When this mode is activated, the input lag rises to an astronomical level of about 100 ms. At such a value, the delay between our movements on the controller (we tested on an Xbox console) and what is displayed on the screen becomes really very large and annoying. Therefore, our recommendation is simple: we absolutely do not recommend using Dolby Vision Gaming mode on this television.

Compatibility with PC

8/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Average
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
13ms
8ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
Max refresh rate
120Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

After connecting the television to the computer and wishing to use it as a monitor, we can expect a low input lag of 13 ms, which is practically unnoticeable on the mouse-screen-eye line. Thanks to the correct implementation of chroma 4:4:4, the readability of fonts is at a high level, so you can confidently connect Samsung Q70D to your computer as a monitor and expect a comfortable experience with text.

The subpixel layout is BGR, which does not negatively affect the use of the television as a monitor. However, as operating systems are not adapted to this type of subpixel format, it may cause slightly less distinct contours. This is, however, something practically negligible, and only a handful of people may notice it.

Generally, when it comes to gaming, the S Pro 2026 is a great screen for PC owners. It offers a refresh rate of up to 288 Hz at Full HD resolution or a full 144 Hz at 4K. All of this, supported by technologies like AMD FreeSync and G-Sync, really means a lot for very demanding gamers. And what about "desktop" work? Here we have good news. Although the displayed font may not be perfectly sharp (like on a dedicated PC monitor with an IPS panel), it is presented in a really pleasant and readable way. This is due to the correct implementation of Chroma 4:4:4 sampling, which ensures that the text is clear and there are no issues with colour fringing.

Viewing angles

2.9/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
71%
66%

Due to the VA panel, the performance of Samsung Q70D in terms of viewing angles is its Achilles' heel. Even a slight shift off-axis leads to a significant loss of contrast and a substantial degradation of colours.

As for a TV equipped with a VA panel, we must admit that the drop in brightness when deviating from the screen's axis is relatively minor on the Xiaomi S Pro 2026. However, it is important to remember the second, crucial aspect – colour saturation degrades significantly at an angle. This is typical behaviour for TVs with VA panels that lack additional coatings to widen viewing angles. Is this a disadvantage of this TV? Not really. It's simply a characteristic, the price we have to pay for the key benefits of a VA panel in terms of its high native contrast.

Daytime performance

5.4/10

7.4/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Average
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

Xiaomi S Pro 2026: 771 cd/m2

Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D: 449 cd/m2

The satin finish of the panel in the Q70D allows for quite good performance in a well-lit room. It is worth noting that reflections do not spread beyond their source, and thus do not bleed onto the rest of the panel. We also commend the maximum brightness of the TV in SDR content, which is 450 nits, allowing for comfortable content consumption during the day.

Due to its extremely high peak brightness, the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 performs really well in bright, sunlit rooms. In most scenarios, it's able to "break through" even very strong lighting in the room. However, it's worth noting that the matrix used here does a fairly average job of suppressing reflections. This means that in darker areas of the image, or when the TV is displaying a dark scene, direct reflections (e.g., window or lamp reflections) can be irritating. Nevertheless, the S Pro 2026, as a TV for a bright living room, excels really well thanks to its powerful brightness.

Panel details

Backlight Type
QLED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-NKM2DDEUC-1053.2
UKN1.240806.107.V816.0.25.6.6.ULBMIXM
Image processor
mt5896 2,5gb ram

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D TV Panel details
Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 TV Panel details

Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D

Xiaomi S Pro 2026

TV features

7.4/10

7.2/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Good
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    No
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D TV features
Review Samsung QLED Q70D / Q74D / Q77D TV features
Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 TV features
Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 TV features
Review Xiaomi S Pro 2026 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

The operation of Samsung Q70D is managed by the proprietary Tizen system. This is fairly well-known software, as the manufacturer has been developing it in their TVs for quite a long time. Its main advantage is smooth operation and a lack of significant stutters, which we can confirm through conducted tests. The biggest downside, however, is its closed nature. Although the app store is quite extensive, we are still dependent on the grace or displeasure of the manufacturer. Therefore, we will not be able to install missing items, even from a USB drive. A perfect example of this is this year's discontinuation of support for the Tidal app. On the other hand, a benefit, especially for Apple device users, is the implementation of AirPlay functionality, which allows for easy screen mirroring from a device to the TV. Fortunately, Samsung also provided the option to connect a keyboard and mouse for much quicker navigation through the TV menu. It’s worth mentioning that the manufacturer has thankfully included a remote that connects via Bluetooth this year, which often wasn't the case in the past. The Tizen system has one more advantage. It integrates very well with external devices, such as the NC+ decoder or soundbars. The connection process is very quick and does not require special skills.

In summary: The Tizen system is very efficiently functioning software, which is certainly a strong advantage of the TV. While more advanced users may complain about the lack of something like KODI, the rest will be satisfied.

Operating System (Google TV)

An enormous advantage of the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is undoubtedly the presence of the Google TV system. This gives us access to a gigantic library of apps – we can literally find everything here, from leading VOD platforms to niche players. The system also offers plenty of useful features, such as built-in Chromecast, support for AirPlay and Screen Mirroring, and efficiently functioning voice search. The Google TV system itself is great, but Xiaomi's implementation needs a little adjustment. During our tests, it occasionally experienced a proverbial "breathlessness." Animations would stutter slightly, and the response to commands was not immediate. This is certainly not the level of fluidity we know from top-tier, significantly more expensive models equipped with more powerful processors.

TV Features and Connectivity

So how does the S Pro 2026 perform as a "regular" television? Unfortunately, we have less good news here. In terms of traditional television viewing, we can mainly praise this model for having a convenient remote with a numeric keypad – which (surprisingly) is no longer a standard today. However, this is where the conveniences end. We won’t find either USB recording functionality (PVR) or PiP (Picture-in-Picture) options. On the plus side, we acknowledge the extensive Bluetooth connectivity options. We were able to connect external devices to the TV without any problems, such as wireless headphones, a keyboard, or a mouse, which significantly eases operation.

Apps

9.3/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

6.8/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in player Samsung Q70D is a significant advantage. It handled nearly all video and audio files prepared for the testing process exceptionally well. The only exceptions in this regard are of course the Dolby Vision format (which is not surprising) and less popular codecs. Additionally, it is worth noting the support for Polish characters and the ability to change font colours as a positive aspect. However, it struggles more with photo formats, as it only supports JPEG among the popular ones. There's definitely a lack of formats like PNG or Apple's HEIC here.

The built-in, default media player in the Xiaomi S Pro 2026 is – considering the capabilities of the Google TV system – simply poor. Its biggest disadvantage is that it does not support characters beyond those from the standard alphabet. Consequently, it does not display, among other things, Polish fonts in subtitles or file names. Fortunately, as we mentioned earlier, the heart of the television is Google TV. This system allows for the quick installation of an external player, which is significantly better, such as VLC or Kodi. For this television, we recommend installing an alternative player immediately after the first startup.

Sound

6.3/10

7.1/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    82dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

The built-in audio system Samsung Q70D, due to its slim design, is not among the most outstanding. Overall, it's fairly balanced, although we wouldn't recommend cranking up the volume to levels higher than 2/4 of the scale. However, if we have a home theatre system, there is a range of codecs available, and we can enjoy the presence of the most important ones, namely DTS-HD Master Audio and Dolby Atmos.

We have to admit that the S Pro 2026 really surprised us in a positive way. The television is equipped with a 30W speaker system, which, for its class, sounds really very good. There’s even a perceivable hint of bass, and the mids and highs are quite well balanced. Of course, all this is within the capabilities of the television's speakers, but it’s a level we didn't expect from such a relatively cheap model. A huge plus is also the support for top audio technologies. The television is able to decode not only the very popular Dolby Atmos format but also the recently rather rare DTS:X, which we mainly find on Blu-ray discs.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

82dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy