Samsung Q8F vs Panasonic W85

Direct comparison

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Amazon FireTV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.3

6.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.3

    5.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.0

    5.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.1

    5.8

  • Gaming on console

    7.2

    7.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    5.6

    4.2

  • Utility functions

    7.3

    6.8

  • Apps

    9.3

    7.6

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    5.8

Advantages

  • Solid contrast thanks to the VA panel

  • Pretty good brightness in SDR and HDR (up to about 500 nits)

  • Satin finish does well with reflections

  • Tizen operating system – fast, intuitive, with a rich app selection

  • Solar remote with USB-C charging

  • Integration with the SmartThings ecosystem

  • Great input lag

  • Good font readability when working with a PC, suitable as a text work monitor

  • Adjustable stand on multiple planes

  • VA matrix with high native contrast

  • High refresh rate of 120/144 Hz

  • Two HDMI 2.1 ports with support for ALLM, VRR, and Dolby Vision in gaming

  • Very low input lag

  • Fairly good colour gamut coverage thanks to the QLED filter

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Sturdy central stand

  • Great compatibility with PC – full chroma 4:4:4, clear fonts

Disadvantages

No like
  • Severely limited features for gamers

  • No USB recording or PiP functionality

  • Average digital image processing

  • Low brightness (below 270 nits) – no real HDR

  • HDR mode in games is poorly refined, with incorrect HGiG implementation

  • Poor multimedia file player

  • The FireTV system in Europe is poorly refined: there are micro stutters and awkward translations, lacking many apps

  • Average sound quality, lacking depth

  • Motion smoother won’t work

Our verdict

Samsung Q8F is quite a successful continuation of the Q67D model. It offers similar image quality in HDR content, and with a brightness of around 500 nits, it creates an effect that is hard to call ordinary. The support for the HDR10+ format also helps, which has been competing with Dolby Vision for some time and provides comparable experiences in many productions. The contrast is another plus – for a VA panel, it holds up well and allows for enjoyable blacks in movies and series. However, the biggest asset of the Q8F remains its operating system. Tizen runs quickly, provides access to many applications, and works well with the SmartThings ecosystem, so the TV can easily be integrated into a larger network of home devices. Interestingly, the Q8F also has a niche use – thanks to very good font readability, it works excellently as a screen for text work. Additionally, the adjustable stand allows the TV to be placed on virtually any desk or in a narrower TV cabinet. The biggest drawback, in our opinion, is not the image quality itself – as it's hard to expect miracles in this price class – but rather what has happened to the features for gamers. Due to updates, options such as VRR and HGiG, which were available even in simpler constructions in previous generations, have disappeared. In fact, the manufacturer even boasts about the availability of these features in their catalogue. This makes it hard to recommend the Q8F to anyone planning to connect a console and counting on full support for new technologies. Therefore, the Q8F is a TV that can appeal – primarily due to its design, above-average image quality, and efficient Tizen system. But at the same time, a step backward compared to its predecessor is evident. Let's hope Samsung can quickly rectify these shortcomings, as otherwise, even such a successful “everyday” TV may leave some users feeling unsatisfied.

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

The Panasonic W85B is a television that aims to prove that the Japanese brand can produce not only high-end devices but also something more "for the people." And indeed — on paper, it looks quite good: a VA panel with solid contrast, high refresh rates of 120/144 Hz, two full HDMI 2.1 ports, and low input lag. It sounds like an excellent set for a gamer or someone who simply wants a cheap television with good fundamentals. However, the reality is a bit more complicated. The W85B performs well primarily with SDR content, especially after calibration, and it will suit typical daily use. But when we start to demand more from it — e.g. expecting strong HDR effects or greater immersion in games with that mode enabled — the television quickly reveals its limitations. Its brightness is low, and the lack of local dimming is noticeably problematic during evening viewing. Therefore, we see the W85B more as a "daily" television — ideal for someone who watches terrestrial TV, YouTube, or streaming in SDR and wants to connect a console or PC at 120/144 Hz (but without HDR). In that role, it works very well. Is it a television for everyone? Definitely not. But if we accept its limitations and approach it without lofty expectations, the W85B can deliver quite a bit of enjoyment for relatively reasonable money.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Average
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment, Base adjustment
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.5/10

5.3/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung Q8F Contrast and black detail

Result

5,200:1

Review Samsung Q8F Contrast and black detail

Result

4,650:1

Review Samsung Q8F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,650:1

Review Samsung Q8F Contrast and black detail

Result

4,100:1

Review Samsung Q8F Contrast and black detail

Result

4,150:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,300:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,250:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,200:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,400:1

Review Panasonic W85 Contrast and black detail

Result

3,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Samsung Q8F uses a VA LCD panel, which immediately puts it in a good position regarding contrast. By nature, such panels offer deeper blacks than IPS panels, and you can actually see this effect here. On test patterns, the contrast ranged from about 4000:1 to even 6000:1, which practically results in a surprisingly engaging image, especially in a slightly dimmed living room. Of course, this is not the level of LCD screens with local dimming, let alone OLED — sometimes the blacks can verge on a shade of navy, and the overall image can appear flat. However, Samsung employs a simple trick: so-called global dimming, which dims the entire screen when there are many dark sections. The effect can be impressive, but it comes at the cost of losing some details, which may not appeal to everyone. Nevertheless, the Q8F still performs significantly better than televisions with IPS panels, offering solid contrast and blacks that can immerse you in the cinematic atmosphere.

W85B is Panasonic's entry-level LCD, so you shouldn't expect miracles in this category, but… the VA panel really does a great job here. Its biggest advantage is simply better contrast than in popular IPS panels – there, blacks often look like grey, but here you can actually see deeper tones. In the scenes we tested, the contrast held around 4000:1, which translates to roughly four times better performance than in IPS displays. Of course, there's no local dimming, so in challenging conditions, when the room gets really dark, the blacks can resemble navy more than absolute pitch black. This is the difference you can see when comparing it to OLEDs or Mini-LEDs. But for everyday viewing – series, matches, evening movies in the living room – this contrast is more than sufficient. The image has the right depth, and the W85B does not give the feeling of a “washed-out” television.

HDR effect quality

5.2/10

4.2/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 90.7%, Bt.2020: 66.2%
DCI P3: 95.6%, Bt.2020: 75.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung Q8F Brightness measurement

Result

473 nit

Review Samsung Q8F Brightness measurement

Result

417 nit

Review Samsung Q8F Brightness measurement

Result

457 nit

Review Samsung Q8F Brightness measurement

Result

210 nit

Review Samsung Q8F Brightness measurement

Result

471 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

249 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

283 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

282 nit

Review Panasonic W85 Brightness measurement

Result

297 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Panasonic W85

Samsung Q8F

In terms of brightness, the Samsung Q8F performs surprisingly well for a TV without local dimming. It measures up to 500 nits, which in practice means that most movie and series scenes look pleasant, and it cannot be faulted for lacking the "HDR effect." In films like Life of Pi or The Meg, the screen can burst with bright light, delivering a level of lighting effect that is satisfying. It struggles more in challenging moments—such as dark scenes with single bright points. The global dimming used causes the TV to darken the image to maintain deep blacks, but at the expense of detail brightness. This is clearly visible in the scene from Sicario 2, where the brightness of the helicopter lights dropped to around 200 nits. This is a deliberate design choice that gives the impression of deeper blacks but takes some shine away from individual elements, and one should simply keep that in mind. Regarding colour reproduction, the Q8F uses quantum dot technology, which expands the colour gamut. A coverage of the DCI-P3 palette at 91% can be considered a decent result, although it is not a record-breaking figure compared to other QLEDs.

Unfortunately, we don't have good news here. The Panasonic W85B is quite a dark television – its peak brightness doesn't exceed 300 nits, making it hard to talk about any real HDR effect. In practice, this means that scenes which can 'shine' and impress on other screens simply look like regular SDR with a slight colour boost here. Our measurements and film tests confirmed this – regardless of the content, the W85B won't draw anything more from HDR. So if someone is looking for a television specifically for HDR, it's better to look at other models. On a positive note, the W85B does quite well in terms of colours. It's a QLED television, so its colour gamut coverage is wide, and most films and series look natural, without a noticeable 'faded' effect. The colours are saturated, so in everyday viewing, there's no feeling that something is seriously off.

Factory color reproduction

4.6/10

4.2/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We decided to check out the Filmmaker mode because right out of the box it gave us the best picture. However, that doesn't mean it was perfect. The white balance had too much of a blue and red tint, causing the whites to lean towards a slight purple-pink hue. Such imbalance affected the visibility of virtually all colours, which is clearly seen in the comparison photo below. The brightness characteristics in SDR content were quite well calibrated, although in HDR materials we noticed that the TV didn't always handle its global dimming well — at times the screen was too dim, while at other times it could suddenly brighten up. Fortunately, issues related to colours can be effectively corrected with calibration tools, so we decided to get to work.

Testing the Panasonic W85B, we obviously started with the Filmmaker mode, as it's the gold standard for watching content "the way the director intended." The problem is that this TV is quite far from those intentions. The biggest issue turned out to be an excess of red – both in SDR and HDR. The image often looked too warm because of this, and in some scenes, it was almost "on fire." Added to this is the issue of brightness management. When we looked at the gamma and EOTF charts, it was clear as day that in most scenes, the TV brightens the image more than it should. The effect was easy to predict. Details can get lost, leading to flattening and clipping across the entire screen. We obviously know how to fix this, but to be fair, it does require a lot of calibration work. Out of the box, the W85B doesn't produce an image close to reference quality – it's more of a TV that, without professional adjustments, will always interpret colours and brightness a bit "in its own way." Unfortunately, this is to the detriment of the viewer.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.8/10

6.9/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, we managed to correct the white balance to almost perfection. Older SDR content looks fantastic — most errors are within a value of 2, which is definitely below the threshold of human perceptibility. In HDR, we also brought the white balance to an acceptable level, but a different problem arises here. So why are there still relatively large errors in colour reproduction? This is mainly due to the limited colour palette and the way the television manages brightness. The global dimming technique used does not give the user control in the settings, so analysing the EOTF curve in HDR films, it's clear that the Q8F can modify luminance on its own. This can be seen as a limitation, but still, the image after calibration is much more enjoyable to watch than in the factory version.

Fortunately, calibration made a significant difference for the Panasonic W85B, especially for SDR content. Here, the improvement was quite evident – we managed to even out the white balance and reasonably tame the TV's tendency to overly brighten the entire image. The picture became more coherent and the colours gained the naturalness that was lacking in the factory settings. Admittedly, the results from the Color Checker are not perfect, as the W85B has noticeable issues with green saturation, but overall, we rate the post-calibration effect in SDR quite positively. The situation with HDR is a bit different. Here too, we managed to reduce the tendency to warm up the entire scene, so the image performed definitely better than in the factory settings. However, there is still the same problem we mentioned earlier – the TV interprets the image too strongly "in its own way" and brightens the whole screen. And the lack of local dimming only exacerbates this effect. In summary, briefly, in SDR content, the W85B performs really well after calibration and is perfectly suitable for everyday viewing. However, in HDR, even after adjustments, it is still difficult to unambiguously recommend it for more serious viewing.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

9.1/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the Q8F performs really well. The television beautifully blends colours, both in bright segments of the sky and in darker scenes, where visible "steps" in colour can easily occur. Admittedly, sporadic errors do happen, but you have to look closely to catch them. In practice, while watching movies or series, the picture looks cohesive and doesn’t get distracted by any artefacts. Therefore, the rating in this category had to be high. 😉

Here we can calmly praise the Panasonic W85B. The TV handles colour blending and tonal transitions remarkably well. Gradients appear smooth, without visible banding or artificial contours. As a result, the image gains a sense of naturalness, and sequences with a lot of subtle shades – like the sky or blurred backgrounds – look exceptionally good for this class of equipment.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

6/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Let's see how the Q8F handles older content, which often has poor quality. Starting with the positives: the upscaling works really well. The TV performs nicely with both classic television and materials from YouTube, not giving the impression that we're dealing with something completely unattractive. It struggles more with content in very low resolutions, such as 576p — the image can be cropped, and unfortunately, the overscan phenomenon cannot be disabled. Moreover, the digital processing does not look great either. The noise reduction feature, instead of removing unwanted artefacts, smooths out almost everything: film grain (which many viewers desire) disappears along with the texture of the image, and actors' faces start to resemble characters from cheap Turkish soap operas. It's hard to consider this option useful — it's best left completely off. Perhaps Samsung will refine the function’s performance in updates, but for now, it’s difficult to view it as anything other than an unnecessary addition.

With native SDR content, the Panasonic W85B performs very well – tonal transitions are smooth and natural, without artificial bands or clear outlines. However, the situation is worse with lower resolution materials. This is where the TV has the biggest problem with "beautifying" the image. The lack of any menu option to improve gradation means that with older films or materials from YouTube, one can sometimes notice slight issues with colour blending.

Fortunately, upscaling, or enhancing the quality of lower resolution content, performs much better. This is definitely a strong point of this model – the image is scaled cleanly and in detail, and the TV handles this better than one might expect from such an inexpensive setup. This is thanks to the HCX processor, which Panasonic has been developing for years, and it shows that even in the lower series, it can do a good job.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.5/10

6.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
No
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
No
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
50%
77%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Due to the applied 60 Hz panel, it's hard to call the Q8F a television made for gaming or watching sports. The panel isn't particularly fast, making motion blur clearly visible. If you were expecting a spectacular, almost 'stadium-like' experience during broadcasts, you might feel a bit disappointed. Fortunately, for movies and series, Samsung hasn't given up on the motion smoothing function. It's nothing more than a smoother that allows for improved fluidity of productions recorded at 24 or 30 frames per second. This way, you can decide for yourself whether you prefer a more fluid, 'television-like' image or to retain the cinematic character. It all depends on the viewer's preferences, and the ability to adjust this parameter is undoubtedly a plus.

At first glance, everything looks good – the Panasonic W85B has a 120 Hz panel and even a 144 Hz mode, so it seems like it should handle smooth motion really well. The problem starts when we delve into the settings. The options for improving fluidity are supposedly present in the menu, but in practice… they don't change anything. No matter what we choose, the image looks the same. On top of that, there’s a lack of BFI, or black frame insertion, which in many TVs helps sharpen motion. And suddenly, it turns out that despite the strong panel, the W85B doesn’t give us any real tools to adjust that motion to our needs. It’s only good when the source itself operates at a higher frequency – for example, games at 120 Hz. But when it comes to movies or sports, we just have to accept what the TV shows us because there’s nothing more that can be done about it.

Console compatibility and gaming features

5/10

8.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

It's not entirely clear what Samsung has messed up this year with its TVs, but the Q8F isn't free from all the confusion with updates and shortcomings. While its older cousin, the Q67D, could still be recommended with a clear conscience to casual gamers, it's hard to find a reason to do so here. Aside from the automatic game mode and the attractively designed Game Bar, we get practically nothing that could appeal to gamers. The lack of proper HGiG implementation is a major issue, especially since the feature simply disappeared after the 1126 update. The situation with VRR is even worse. Even though it appears in the manufacturer's brochures and shows up in the Game Bar, we couldn't get it to work. The Xbox Series X console wouldn't allow it to be activated at all, and the option remained greyed out and inactive. It's difficult to praise such a TV even to casual gamers, which is a shame because Samsung has had a strong selling point in the gaming segment for years.

[UPDATE] We have updated our 2025 Samsung TV reviews following the release of firmware version 1131, which officially restores the essential HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) support.

On paper, the Panasonic W85B looks really solid. It has two full HDMI 2.1 ports, support for ALLM, variable refresh rates, Dolby Vision in games, and of course, a high refresh rate for the panel itself. Additionally, there's the characteristic Panasonic game bar, which allows you to view key parameters with a single click and quickly change them if needed. It sounds great, but the problem arises when we enable HDR. Here, the W85B really struggles because the implementation of HGiG is practically nonexistent – the TV poorly manages brightness, and instead of faithful images, we get scenes that are too bright, sometimes even blown out. The solution? The simplest one – turn off HDR in the console settings and keep everything in SDR. And here it gets really interesting, because in this scenario, the W85B shows its better side. Low input lag, high smoothness thanks to 120 Hz – all of this makes gaming look phenomenal. Yes, HDR can be skipped, but if responsiveness and smooth gameplay are the priorities, the W85B provides plenty of fun.

Input lag

9.9/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
17 ms
1080p120
8 ms
2160p60
14 ms
17 ms
2160p120
8 ms

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
17 ms
2160p120
8 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
17 ms
2160p120 DV
10 ms

Fortunately, when it comes to gaming, Samsung didn't try to "improve" anything and the input lag remained at an excellent level. Results hovering around 10–15 ms mean that the delays are practically unnoticeable. The controls are instant, and the responses from the console or computer appear on the screen without any noticeable delay. In this regard, the Q8F performs exceptionally well and it's hard to fault it.

There’s really nothing to worry about here. The Panasonic W85B reacts instantly to our movements, and the values measured in tests can easily compete with gaming monitors. At a 120 Hz signal, the input lag is around 8–10 ms, and at 60 Hz it hovers around 17–20 ms. In practice, this means one thing – no delays, no frustration! You press the button, and the action happens immediately on the screen.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
14ms
8ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

While playing on the Q8F isn't exactly the most attractive option—it's lacking modes with lower resolution and higher refresh rates, plus there are issues with VRR (G-Sync) and the panel is limited to 60 Hz—it performs excellently as a monitor for work. Font readability is at a very high level, so working with text or spreadsheets in Excel is a pure pleasure. In this regard, the Q8F could be a viable alternative to a large office monitor.

The Panasonic W85B performs surprisingly well as a computer monitor. It is perfect for office work – the fonts are sharp and very readable thanks to full 4:4:4 chroma support, so writing, browsing the web, or working on spreadsheets is a breeze. But the real "fun" starts when gaming. The TV handles up to 144 Hz refresh rates for PC effortlessly, and it supports popular image synchronisation technologies like NVIDIA G-Sync and AMD FreeSync. This means we don't have to worry about screen tearing or micro-stuttering – gameplay is smooth and looks simply fantastic.

Viewing angles

3.4/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
79%
77%

The viewing angles on the Q8F can be described as average, resulting from the applied VA matrix. Watching the television head-on, the picture looks very good, but just shifting slightly to the side causes it to start fading and losing contrast. Colours gradually lose their saturation, and black takes on a greyish hue. This is a typical limitation of this type of panel, and it’s hard to expect miracles here. Compared to IPS matrices, the difference is clear — while these have weaker contrast, they hold colour better at an angle. The Q8F is best suited for a classic setup, where viewers sit centrally in front of the screen. If you’re planning screenings with a larger group, with people spread wider across the living room, the effect may not be as satisfying.

Here you can see the biggest price we pay for the high quality of the VA matrix contrast. The W85B, like most TVs with this type of panel, doesn't perform well when viewed at wider angles. Colours lose intensity and the image begins to fade as soon as you move away from the screen's axis. This is not a flaw of Panasonic itself, but rather a characteristic of VA technology – great contrast in exchange for poorer viewing angles. So, if you plan to watch movies with a larger group and often sit "off to the side", it's something to keep in mind.

Daytime performance

5.6/10

4.2/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Good
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Panasonic W85: 263 cd/m2

Samsung Q8F: 430 cd/m2

The Q8F performs quite well during the day. Its brightness hovers around 450 nits, which proves to be a sufficient level for moderately bright living rooms. It's not a TV that will win a battle against sunlight streaming directly through the window, but in typical home conditions, the picture remains clear and appealing. A big plus is the satin finish of the panel, which effectively reduces light reflections and helps maintain colour saturation even when the room is bright. This makes watching series during the day or evening sports broadcasts with the lights on no problem. The Q8F doesn't aspire to be a cinema TV in full sunlight, but as a daily screen in normal home conditions, it performs really well.

The Panasonic W85B features a satin-finished panel that does quite well in reducing reflections and maintaining colours even in bright light coming from windows or lamps. There’s no ‘mirror’ effect here, so in a typical lounge during the day, watching TV is comfortable. However, the problem arises when you’re in really bright rooms – the TV doesn’t have high brightness, so it won’t cut through very strong sunlight. It’s simply a screen that performs best in controlled conditions.

Panel details

Backlight Type
QLED
QLED
Software version during testing
T-RSLFDEUC-0090-1126.0, E2540300, BT-S
Fire OS 8.1.4.6 (RS8146/3057
Image processor
MT5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung Q8F TV Panel details
Review Panasonic W85 TV Panel details

Samsung Q8F

Panasonic W85

TV features

7.3/10

6.8/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung Q8F TV features
Review Samsung Q8F TV features
Review Samsung Q8F TV features
Review Samsung Q8F TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features
Review Panasonic W85 TV features

SmartTV Features: Tizen

In terms of smart features, the Q8F is right up there with what Samsung has made us accustomed to. It comes with the Tizen system – fast, intuitive, and well integrated with other devices. AirPlay, screen mirroring, and simple voice commands work seamlessly, so the basics are ticked off perfectly. Added to this is SmartThings, an app that turns the TV into the hub of a home ecosystem. You can connect a washing machine, vacuum cleaner, light bulbs, or speakers and control everything from one place, including the TV. There are also plenty of apps in Tizen for watching movies and series – Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, and Prime Video are all readily available. However, it should be noted that Tizen is a closed system, so if someone is hoping to install less popular programs, they might be disappointed.

Traditional Television

Traditional television falls short. The Q8F simply serves as a screen here – it will display the picture, but additional features like USB recording or PiP mode are absent. The remote is small and very minimalist. It looks modern and can be charged via solar batteries on the back cover or through USB-C, but it's worth noting that it might not suit everyone – particularly older users may miss traditional buttons. However, it's fair to say that Samsung has been consistently steering its TVs (and competitors who are copying some of their ideas) towards the smart home direction rather than towards devices "for grandma and grandpa". Given the enormous popularity of the brand, one can assume that most users, even the older ones, have already gotten used to the fact that the era of remotes with a whole range of rubber buttons is slowly coming to an end.

SmartTV: FireTV

The W85B runs on the Fire TV system and it must be said – it’s a significant step forward compared to Panasonic's previous proprietary solutions. We have support for AirPlay, screen mirroring, and even voice control via Alexa. It sounds modern and, in practice, it actually offers quite a lot of possibilities. The problem is that in Europe Fire TV still looks a bit like a “guest with luggage.” It works decently, but there are occasional micro-stutters, the interface doesn’t always respond as smoothly as we would like, and the menu can have awkward translations. It’s not yet at the level of the biggest players like Google TV or even Tizen, but it's still an improvement over what Panasonic had before. The worst part of it all is that the Fire TV app library is quite modest, and that is its biggest drawback.

Classic TV Functions

In terms of typical TV features, it’s quite good – we have a classic remote with a full numeric keypad, a clear EPG guide, and the ability to record programs from the built-in tuner onto an external USB drive (e.g. a flash drive). The downside is the lack of an option to schedule recordings in advance – you can record “here and now,” but can't set recordings for later.

Apps

9.3/10

7.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
No
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
No
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

3.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

Samsung Q8F handles playback of files from USB quite efficiently. It supports almost all popular video formats as well as photos, so you can easily load a holiday movie or a family album. There are occasional exceptions with less popular photo formats, but the essential JPEG works flawlessly, which will be crucial for most users. It's a shame that Tizen doesn't allow the installation of alternative players, such as VLC. Then even less popular formats wouldn't pose any problem.

The biggest pain point of the built-in player with Fire TV is the lack of support for external subtitle files. If you have your own movie library and use text files, you simply won't be able to display them on this TV. The player itself handles basic video formats, but if someone wants to fully utilise files from USB, they'll probably end up installing an additional app from the store (e.g., VLC).

Sound

6/10

5.8/10

  • Maximum volume
    84dB
    87dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The sound on the Q8F can be described as acceptable. You can hear a slightly defined bass, but it's really minimal – the slim design of the television simply doesn't allow the pair of 2 × 10 W speakers to spread their wings. This is a typical scenario for most televisions: if someone cares about truly cinematic experiences, it's worth considering a soundbar. Samsung has a really wide range in this category across different budgets, so it's easy to find something suitable. The television itself is fine for watching traditional TV and series occasionally, but you wouldn't expect much in terms of audio excitement.

Here the Panasonic W85B unfortunately has nothing to brag about. The speakers sound flat and quite “plasticky”, so there’s definitely no cinematic experience to be had here. There's no depth, no clear bass – just basic sound that’s simply meant to “be”. It's a pity because we thought the external subwoofer used here would actually make a difference. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The only advantage is that the TV can play really loud. This may appeal to older users who often need higher volume to comfortably watch programs or news. For everyday TV watching, it’s sufficient, but if someone is thinking about movies and games – an additional soundbar or audio system is basically a requirement.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

84dBC (Max)

75dBC

87dBC (Max)

75dBC