Samsung Q7F vs LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

Direct compare

QNED85A / QNED86A / QNED87A / A6A / A6B / A6C

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”100”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.7

7.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.7

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.6

    6.2

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.3

    7.2

  • Gaming on console

    6.3

    8.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    8.0

  • Watching in bright light

    3.9

    5.8

  • Utility functions

    6.6

    8.4

  • Apps

    8.7

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    5.8

    6.0

Advantages

  • Solid native contrast (VA Panel)

  • Vivid colours thanks to the QLED filter

  • Low input lag (around 10MS)

  • Robust and smooth Tizen operating system

  • Compact sleek design with Type C charging

  • 120 Hz panel, great for sports and gaming

  • Very low input lag

  • Excellent for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG etc.)

  • Full set of HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Good compatibility with PC (great font readability)

  • Bright picture (about 700 nits in HDR), suitable for moderately bright rooms

  • Good viewing angles (IPS)

  • Support for Dolby Vision

  • User-friendly webOS operating system with Magic Remote control featuring voice assistant

  • Ability to record programs to USB

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very low brightness (only 250 nits in HDR)

  • Lack of many gaming features including VRR and HGiG – the manufacturer promised something, but in the end, those features are simply not there

  • Lack of many classic "TV" features like USB recording or PIP

  • No Dolby Vision

  • Average digital image processing quality

  • Very poor black levels and contrast due to the IPS panel

  • Lack of the advertised 144 Hz in PC mode

  • Aggressive “light stripes” when local dimming is turned on (edge local dimming ruins evening movie sessions)

  • Confusion in model names and versions – even TVs with the same name in different stores can have different stands (central or two legs) or frame colours, which can be quite misleading when making a purchase.

Our verdict

Samsung Q7F is the cheapest model from the manufacturer in the QLED line, and it must be said that a few advantages can easily be pointed out here. After calibration, the colours look really good, and the additional QLED filter ensures that the hues are more saturated than in typical budget LCD televisions. Additionally, there’s a VA panel that offers quite decent native contrast. It’s certainly not on the level of top-tier models, but in everyday viewing, it does the job. However, the biggest plus is the Tizen system, Samsung’s flagship offering. It runs smoothly, is comprehensive, provides access to a plethora of applications and add-ons, and allows for easy integration of the television into the SmartThings ecosystem to control other devices in the home. And essentially, that’s where the list of positives ends, as the longer you use the Q7F, the more apparent it becomes that this is a product that is quite unfinished. It’s not just about the panel itself with its low brightness and mediocre image quality in HDR films, but also about the lack of features that usually worked flawlessly in Samsung devices. The manufacturer claims the presence of VRR and HGiG, but in practice, they are of no use, making it difficult to recommend the television even to casual gamers. For regular TV viewing, it doesn’t perform the best either because the digital image processing is at best average, and the feature for improving tonal transitions, which usually works well for Samsung, is practically ineffective here. The Q7F is a piece of equipment that can only be recommended to those looking for a television with two slogans on the box: “QLED” and “good Smart TV”. The rest get a rather bland product that lacks a lot to even compete with other more budget-friendly offerings. It’s a shame because usually, the term "QLED" in Samsung meant something more than just an ordinary television.

QNED86A6A is a television that really does a great job in its price class when it comes to sports, gaming, and everyday TV viewing. The 120 Hz panel makes the image smooth, and the motion sharp, which will be appreciated by both fans and gamers. Additionally, it has low input lag along with a full suite of gaming features such as HGiG, VRR, and ALLM. The television works just as well with a computer as it does with a console, so in the office or on a desk in the 43” version, it will serve excellently as a work monitor. Another strong point is the webOS system. It’s a fast, stable, and app-rich operating system that paired with the Magic Remote provides very convenient operation. The new version of the remote is slimmer and fits better in the hand, and the on-screen cursor is a feature that many competitors lack. On top of that, there are classic features – USB recording, Bluetooth for headphones, and a full set of HDMI 2.1 with eARC and Dolby Atmos support. This makes the televisions from the QNED85 series some of the most "multimedia" televisions in their class. But there’s no point in sugar-coating it; this model also has some significant drawbacks. Its biggest disadvantage is undoubtedly the contrast, or rather the lack thereof. The IPS panel combined with the edge-lit “mini-LED” is just a very bad idea. The screen simply isn’t suitable for watching movies in a dark living room. Blacks are a greyish-blue, and local dimming can create strips of light reminiscent of lasers, which effectively ruins the viewing experience. For home cinema, it’s not a choice that can be recommended with full conviction. The second issue may not be directly related to the television itself but rather its sales. It concerns chaos in the naming conventions and differences in derivative versions. The same model, even with the same designation, can have a different colour frame or stand depending on the store. This can really be frustrating for the buyer and evoke a sense of confusion. To summarise briefly: LG QNED86A6A is a great television for sports, gaming, and everyday TV, with a convenient system and high functionality. But if you’re looking for a screen strictly for movies or series and require deep blacks, it’s better to look towards televisions that can actually be confidently referred to as Mini-LEDs.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
BuildQuality-Good
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Stand type
stand-type-Graphite
stand-type-Graphite
Stand
Height adjustment, Base adjustment
Height adjustment
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

4.7/10

3.7/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 6 (1 x 6)

Contrast:

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,850:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,300:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

3,050:1

Review Samsung Q7F Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,050:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,750:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,800:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,850:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,350:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

The Samsung Q7F in the 55-inch size we tested has a VA panel, which immediately translates to decent native contrast. Values around 3000:1 may not be record-breaking, as we know that VA panels are currently being produced with more than double the contrast, but it still performs much better than IPS or ADS panels, where black quickly turns into shades of grey or navy blue. Unfortunately, we won't find typical local dimming zones here, but the manufacturer has added something like global dimming – that is, dimming the whole screen relative to the content. The effect? In most scenes, black looks quite solid, although during nighttime viewing, we will still see that it resembles a dark navy or grey more than true pitch black. Overall, it's alright, but without any fireworks – it's not spectacular, but there's also no drama.

While the manufacturer describes the QNED86A as a Mini-LED television, there’s no sign of the multi-zone local dimming system known from pricier models. In practice, we have a classic edge lighting system, which only allows for dimming horizontal strips of the screen from top to bottom. Combined with a low-contrast IPS/ADS panel, the effect is simply poor. If we choose to leave local dimming on, a problem arises - the television can illuminate selected areas in such a way that it looks like “flying lasers” crossing the screen. This is very distracting and in such conditions, it’s hard to talk about truly cinematic experiences. Therefore, in our opinion, it's better to turn this function off. However, one must reckon with the fact that the contrast then drops to around 1500:1, but at least the image doesn’t irritate with artificial flashes.

HDR effect quality

3.7/10

6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 92.4%, Bt.2020: 69.2%
DCI P3: 95.4%, Bt.2020: 73.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

215 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

225 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

267 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

113 nit

Review Samsung Q7F Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

524 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

690 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

512 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

500 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

HDR luminance chart:

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

HDR luminance

Samsung Q7F

HDR luminance

Unfortunately, the Samsung Q7F is not one of the bright televisions, which directly impacts the quality of HDR films. The peak brightness of the panel is only around 250 nits, which is definitely insufficient for claiming a true cinematic experience. In practice, the HDR content does not differ significantly from classic SDR, making it difficult to talk about any "wow effect" that usually accompanies us when watching such films. During testing of film scenes, the image simply looked dark, and the brightness almost always hovered around the aforementioned 250 nits. The worst performance came from shots with small, intensely glowing elements – the global dimming technique used reacted very aggressively in those cases, dimming the entire screen to maintain the black effect. However, it is worth noting the presence of a QLED coating that broadens the colour spectrum. For a budget QLED model, the Q7F performs quite decently here: the DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage is around 93%, and BT.2020 reaches 70%. This means that despite the low brightness, the colours can still look quite vivid and attractive.

Against the backdrop of contrast and black, the brightness of the QNED86A and the overall HDR effect fare much better. It's a television that can achieve around 700 nits under the best conditions, so in terms of luminance alone, there’s nothing to be ashamed of. As a result, scenes with strong lights, explosions, flashes, or bright parts of the landscape – look clear and can make an impression. Interestingly, even in tougher moments with small, contrasting elements on the screen, the television does well with backlighting and details are quite visible. The problem arises when there are many dark tones. The lack of effective local dimming means that black virtually disappears, and instead, we get a grey glow spreading across the entire screen. This kills the depth effect and causes the image to appear flat, as if it lacks cinematic character. In bright animations or family films with vibrant colours, this won't be an issue, as the colours and bright light dominate. But in horror films or productions set in darkness, these limitations are strongly felt. As a consolation, it’s worth noting that the QNED86A is essentially a QLED television with an LED PFS filter, which gives it very good coverage of wide colour gamuts. Both the DCI-P3 palette and the wider BT.2020 perform solidly here. This means that colours in HDR films are saturated, juicy, and have the right depth – even if the black itself is disappointing, the colours can save the viewing experience and make the image look appealing.

Factory color reproduction

5/10

5.6/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The reproduction of factory colours in the Samsung Q7F is definitely not one of its strong points. In Filmmaker mode, which theoretically should be closest to neutral, the white balance issue is immediately noticeable. There’s too much red on the screen, while blue is lacking. The effects are very easy to notice – white, instead of being neutral, takes on warm, almost slightly orange tones. In the long run, this makes the entire image appear a bit unnatural, while bright areas of the scene can seem unrealistic. The problems are even more evident in HDR content. The charts show that the TV has significant errors in the Color Checker palette, which results in visible inaccuracies in the real image. In practice, this means that colours are not presented as they should be. The Q7F also heavily manipulates brightness; darker elements are overly boosted, causing them to lose their cinematic feel, while bright parts can be dimmed. This makes the image seem flattened, and contrast, instead of helping to bring out details, only highlights its own limitations. In HDR materials, this is particularly frustrating because every detail matters. In scenes where a subtle play of light and shadow should be felt, the Q7F either overdoes the lighting or, conversely, suppresses elements that should attract the eye. This causes the image to lose its depth, and instead of cinematic realism, we have a rather simplified effect.

We primarily tested the QNED86A in Filmmaker mode, which is designed to provide the most faithful picture. Unfortunately, right out of the box, there were quite a few shortcomings. The most glaring issue was the poorly calibrated white balance – there was a lack of blue, which caused the overall image to take on a slightly yellowish, and sometimes even an orange hue. An even bigger problem was the way the television manages brightness. Due to its technical limitations – that is, local dimming functioning only along the edges of the screen – the QNED86A has a tendency to oversaturate entire scenes. This is where the flattening of the image that we mentioned earlier comes from. Instead of clear depth and contrast, we get something akin to "boosted brightness," which, in the long run, can strain the eyes.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.6/10

7.6/10

After professional calibration, we managed to bring the Q7F to order – at least in terms of SDR content. The image in this mode looks really good: the white balance has been set correctly, the colours appear natural, and the errors in the colour palette have dropped to levels practically invisible to the eye. Gamma behaves exemplary, and the only minor flaw remains a slight lightening of smaller elements, which stems from the lack of local dimming. For everyday watching of television or films in standard quality, the Q7F performs surprisingly well.

It was significantly more challenging to tame HDR content. Despite adjusting the white balance, the television still heavily manipulates brightness, causing scenes to appear unnatural – what was meant to be subtly darker can sometimes be overly bright, and the bright parts of the image can occasionally be dimmed. The final effect is better than in factory settings, but it’s clear that the construction limitations of the Q7F do not allow for fully utilising the potential of HDR materials.

What was saved in the QNED86A6A is undoubtedly the colours. After calibration, the white balance was set with great precision, ensuring that deviations on the Colour Checker palette mostly did not exceed the visibility threshold for the human eye. In other words – the colours finally looked natural, without strange yellow or orange tones that had previously marred the perception. Unfortunately, even the best calibration cannot overcome structural limitations. The already mentioned very modest number of local dimming zones and their unfortunate placement meant that the analysis of the EOTF curve in films still showed noticeable scene over-exposures. The image tended to flatten, lacking cinematic depth. Fortunately, this effect is not as visible in older productions or in SDR content. There, calibration really does its job and allows the QNED to be tamed so the image can be pleasing. However, the specifics of this construction – especially the contrast issues – cannot be completely bypassed.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

8.9/10

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the Q7F is really quite good. The gradients are smooth, without harsh steps or artificial divisions that can be quite noticeable in cheaper TVs. Even in more challenging scenes, like the one from The Revenant or the red shot with the actor swimming in water, the picture maintained its quality and simply looked good. If someone is looking very closely, they might notice slight imperfections in extremely demanding moments, but they are subtle enough that most people won’t even notice them. Given this price range, the Q7F performs surprisingly well in terms of gradation, and it's hard to find anything serious to complain about.

Colour gradation is one of the strong points of the QNED86A. In everyday viewing, the picture looks really smooth, without noticeable "steps" or sudden transitions between colours. The TV handles colour blending quite naturally, so with most content, it’s hard to spot any issues with gradation. Any imperfections only appear in extreme conditions – for example, in the darkest parts of films, where even much more expensive TVs can have problems. There, you might notice slight banding or characteristic stripes, but these are marginal situations that shouldn’t be a bother during regular use. Overall, the QNED86A performs well in this category and has nothing to be ashamed of compared to the competition.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

4.5/10

7.8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Upscaling and digital image processing in the Q7F is a bit of a rollercoaster. On one hand, we have really nice upscaling – weaker sources look better than you might expect. The image becomes clearer, sharper, and even older films or free-to-air TV hold up well. Samsung has been strong in this area for years, and the Q7F confirms that. On the other hand… things start to get tricky. The TV has a problem with overscan – part of the image is simply cut off, and it doesn't look very elegant. Additionally, we were let down by a feature called "noise reduction," which should improve the smoothness of tonal transitions in weaker materials. In other Samsungs, it works relatively well, but here it practically makes no difference – the banding in gradients is still there. It's a bit of a shame because we expected more from a model that is aimed at users looking for a display for SDR content.

If someone is worried about potential "steps" when blending colours, the QNED86A has a simple solution for that. Just turn on the feature called Smooth Gradation and set it to the medium level. Then the TV really smooths out all those unwanted transitions – especially in older productions – and it does so in a way that the film grain doesn’t disappear, nor do any strange artefacts appear. In other words, you can use it without any worries.

The upscaling itself also turns out quite well. Of course, there are no miracles here – with poorer quality sources, you can notice characteristic jagged edges. Fortunately, there is a sharpness slider in the menu, and if someone prefers a more "soft" image, it can be quickly adjusted to their own taste.

Blur and motion smoothness

5.5/10

7.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
-
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
49%
62%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Motion blur and motion fluidity in the Q7F is probably the most budget-friendly aspect of this television. The 60 Hz panel makes the motion blur quite noticeable, especially in dynamic scenes, and it's rather hard to consider this model as equipment designed for watching sports or playing fast-paced games. In tests with the little green man, there was a long trail, similarly, the ball in a football match would leave behind streaks.

On the positive side, the presence of motion smoothing is worth noting. In films, it really makes a difference – especially since most materials are recorded in 24 frames. Here we can decide whether we prefer a more "cinematic" image, with a slight judder typically found in cinema, or a smoother, more “TV-like” one. This actually works quite well and helps improve the viewing comfort for series or movies.

QNED86A has been equipped with a 120 Hz refresh rate panel, so right from the start, it can be said to be suitable for both sports and gaming. And indeed it is – the picture looks smooth, and motion blur isn’t too much of an issue. IPS panels have always had a bit of a problem with this, and here too you can sometimes notice slight blurring, especially in very dynamic scenes, but it’s not something that ruins watching a match or a fast-paced game. For cinema and sports fans, LG has included the traditional TruMotion smoothing feature. In the menu, we have two sliders – one for movies (De-Judder), and the other for sports (De-Blur). The first adds missing frames and allows you to adjust the character of motion – from raw, cinematic to a more fluid, “theatrical” feel. The second improves sharpness during dynamic actions, so it’s worth turning it up a bit if you watch a lot of sports.

Console compatibility and gaming features

3.3/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    Yes
  • VRR range
    No
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The features for gamers on the Samsung Q7F is a topic that stirs up quite a few mixed emotions. On one hand – no reasonable person was expecting miracles here, after all, it’s a 60 Hz television and it was clear from the get-go that this wouldn’t be equipment to squeeze the maximum from a console or PC. On the other hand, since the manufacturer promised specific solutions in promotional materials, it is only natural that we wanted to see them in practice. At the start, it’s looking pretty good. The automatic game mode (ALLM) works, so there’s no need to manually fiddle with the settings; the console switches the TV to low latency mode by itself. Plus, we have the Game Bar, which looks impressive and allows you to check a few basic parameters without leaving the game. And this is where the good news ends.

The biggest problem with the Q7F is VRR, or rather its absence. Indeed, the appropriate icon appears in the menu, you can even see it in the Game Bar, but throughout the entire test, the function remained dead and could not be activated in any way. Even more disappointing is the matter of HGiG; this option was actually available in the beginning, but after a software update, it disappeared completely, which is just unprofessional. Therefore, the Q7F is only suitable for absolute basics. Sure, you can turn on the console, play calmer titles, and enjoy low input lag, but if someone is counting on more advanced features that the manufacturer promised, they will be disappointed. This is not a television one buys with gaming in mind, and it’s better to be aware of this before purchasing.

When it comes to gaming, the LG QNED86A6A is a complete tool. It features four HDMI 2.1 ports with a full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s, which means that whether you connect a PlayStation 5, an Xbox Series X, or a powerful PC – everything will work in full 4K at 120 Hz with support for all functions. This is a significant advantage, as some competitors still only feature two such ports, which can be troublesome when dealing with multiple devices. It also includes VRR, or variable refresh rate, which eliminates screen tearing, and ALLM, which automatically activates game mode when the console powers on. Dolby Vision Gaming is included as well, alongside proper implementation of the HGiG format, so titles that support these formats look livelier and more detailed. Additionally, there's the Game Optimizer – a kind of control centre for gamers. From this interface, you can view image parameters in real time, quickly switch modes, activate additional features, or adjust picture settings to your own preferences. The LG QNED86A6A has basically everything you would expect from a modern gaming television.

Input lag

10/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
15 ms
1080p120
6 ms
2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
14 ms
2160p120
6 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
15 ms
2160p120 DV
6 ms

Input lag on the Samsung Q7F is really good for a 60 Hz TV. Measurements showed values below 12 ms, which means this model is more than sufficient for regular gaming on a console. Of course, it doesn't compare to the top-tier 120 Hz screens that can drop below 6–7 ms, but in everyday use, it's hard to talk about noticeable delay. In this regard, the Q7F doesn't fall behind its competitors in its segment and can easily be considered a safe choice for casual or sports gaming. At least in this respect.

There’s really nothing to complain about here. The QNED86A6A achieves excellent results – around 5 ms with 120 Hz content and about 15 ms with 60 Hz. These values will comfortably satisfy both console gamers and those who connect a PC to the TV. The response to movements is instantaneous, so you can forget about delays between the image and the action on the pad.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

8/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
13ms
6ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

Collaboration with a PC on the Q7F is decent, though it's not a television that will satisfy the most demanding users. Fonts are displayed clearly and sharply, so you can comfortably work on it – especially for everyday office tasks or browsing the internet. With thin letters, you can notice slight shading, but it's not something that hinders normal use. In a smaller size, the Q7F can indeed serve as a computer screen, although you have to keep its limitations in mind. The lack of variable refresh rate means we won't benefit from G-Sync or FreeSync, and the 60 Hz effectively limits more demanding PC gaming. It will be fine for work and light use, but for serious gaming, it's definitely better to look for something higher up in Samsung's range.

LG QNED86A, with its IPS panel, full RGB subpixel layout, and proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4, makes text look fantastic on the QNED86A6A. The text is sharp, clear, and readable, making the TV ideal for office work. This is important as this year the model also debuts in a 43" size, which can easily sit on a desk and serve as a large monitor. Of course, some users opting for the 43" will be gamers, and here too there are no complaints. The TV supports 4K at 120 Hz, so gameplay is smooth and enjoyable. It's a bit of a shame that there wasn't a mode with a higher refresh rate, such as the 144Hz claimed by the manufacturer, as PC gamers would definitely appreciate that. Despite this, the QNED86A6A performs really well as a monitor for gaming and work.

Viewing angles

3.5/10

6.9/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
78%
61%

The viewing angles on the Q7F are simply poor – typical for a VA panel. Just sitting slightly off to the side immediately shows that the picture loses quality. Colours fade, contrast noticeably drops, and blacks start to resemble grey more than anything deep. This is a television that is definitely best viewed head-on, and any larger viewing angle involves compromises.

QNED86A6A performs very well in this regard. The IPS panel used here ensures that the image retains its brightness and colour saturation even when viewed at an angle. There is no fading effect here, which often occurs in cheaper TVs with VA panels. Of course – it’s not worth comparing it to the level offered by organic panels, where colours and contrast hold perfectly at almost any angle. But as far as LCD TVs go, this is definitely one of the better results and is more than sufficient for watching movies or sports together on the couch with a larger group.

TV efficiency during daytime

3.9/10

5.8/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A: 462 cd/m2

Samsung Q7F: 237 cd/m2

The performance of the Q7F during the day unfortunately doesn't impress. Due to its low brightness, the screen quickly capitulates in very sunny rooms. Therefore, it’s hard to recommend it to those who plan to watch television in a bright living room with large windows. In moderately lit rooms, it manages reasonably well, but in bright light, the image loses clarity. Additionally, the fact that the panel doesn’t always effectively handle reflections means that glares can be bothersome during the day. This is rather a screen for evening viewing than for daily sessions in full sunlight.

QNED86A6A is not a master of brightness, but it manages adequately. Thanks to the moderately high brightness of the panel and quite decent glare reduction, the TV performs well in typical, moderately lit living rooms. The picture remains clear, and the colours do not lose their intensity in daylight. However, let's not kid ourselves, this is not a screen that will handle extremely bright conditions, where sunlight floods in through large windows and strongly saturates the room.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
QLED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-RSLFDEUC-0090-1110.7, E2500007, BT-S
33.20.74
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Samsung Q7F

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

TV features

6.6/10

8.4/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

Smart TV – Tizen System

Here the Q7F shows its strongest side. Samsung has been developing the Tizen system for years, and it's clear that we are dealing with a mature, refined platform. Everything runs smoothly, the menu doesn’t lag even when switching between heavier applications, and installing additional programs from the library is quick and hassle-free. Additionally, there’s full support for AirPlay, integration with voice assistants, as well as a wide range of add-ons – from cooperation with devices in the SmartThings ecosystem to the ability to control Philips Hue smart lighting or other smart gadgets. Samsung strongly emphasises expanded network features, and it's evident – in terms of Smart TV, the Q7F has absolutely nothing to be ashamed of; on the contrary, it can put to shame more expensive competitors.

Classic Features

On the side of classic, “television” solutions, it’s clear that the manufacturer has put everything on the smart card. We won’t find USB recording or PiP mode here, which were once standards. It’s apparent that the Q7F is meant to be primarily a multimedia centre, rather than a device for those accustomed to more traditional solutions. Fortunately, there are a few practical additions – we have Bluetooth for pairing headphones or speakers and an option to change the font size in the menu, which users with weaker eyesight will appreciate.

Smart Features: webOS

QNED86A6A runs on the well-known webOS – a system that has been a strong point of LG TVs for years. Everything operates quickly and smoothly, applications launch without significant delays, although the interface can sometimes feel a bit overloaded with ads. Fortunately, day to day, the convenience outweighs the shortcomings. A significant advantage is the Magic Remote, which allows you to control the cursor like a mouse – it's one of those solutions that you quickly get used to and later find hard to give up. In the new version, the remote is slimmer, as it has been stripped of the numeric keypad. Some will appreciate the simplicity, while others will miss the classic set of buttons; it’s more a matter of habit.

Classic Features

On board, we also find some solutions that in 2025 are not always obvious. There is the option to record programs from the built-in DVB-T2 tuners to USB, so you can easily return to a match or series at any time. In the evening, Bluetooth headphone support is handy – especially if someone in the house falls asleep quicker than we do. Additionally, there’s a full set of HDMI 2.1 ports with eARC support and audio formats such as Dolby Digital or Dolby Atmos.

Playing files from USB

9/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

In the Q7F, we have a built-in file player and, as is usually the case with Samsung TVs, it works quite well – most popular movies or music play without any fuss. For basic use, it’s sufficient and you probably won’t need to reach for external solutions like connecting a laptop. It’s a different story if someone wants to upload photos – it can struggle here, especially with Apple’s HEIC or PNG, which are visible in the player menu but don’t necessarily want to work.

The built-in media player in the QNED86A6A handles the most popular audio and video formats quite well. During testing, we had no issues playing MP4, MKV, or MP3 files; everything played smoothly and without hiccups. The TV also managed most images, although here we encountered a common barrier for many manufacturers – the lack of full support for the HEIC format from Apple. So, if you regularly use an iPhone and store photos in this standard, you'll need to convert them beforehand or, better yet, transfer them using AirPlay. Other than that, it's hard to find fault; as far as built-in solutions go, it's really decent.

Apps

8.7/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

5.8/10

6/10

  • Maximum volume
    80dB
    84dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Samsung Q7F has a speaker set with a power of 20 W and… well, let's not kid ourselves, it's not a revelation. The TV itself sounds quite decent, meaning series, news, or daily programs are clearly audible, dialogues are not lost, but there's a significant lack of depth or sound space. There's practically no bass; something thuds, but it resembles tapping on a box more than real low frequencies. Music sounds flat, films also don't leave a strong impression – you won't feel like you're in a cinema. It's a sound in the "acceptable" category, just to have something built-in, but if someone is hoping for a stronger experience, they'll end up reaching for a soundbar sooner or later. And to be honest – even the simplest model will make a noticeable difference, and Samsung has quite a few of those on offer.

In terms of sound, the QNED86A6A performs quite decently, but let's not kid ourselves – it’s not a level that will impress home cinema enthusiasts. The sound is clear and distinct, dialogues are easily heard, but overall it sounds rather flat and definitely lacks solid bass tones. For everyday TV watching, streaming services, or news, it’s an acceptable level, however, if you're planning to watch movies or play games more often, even a basic soundbar will make a significant difference.

Acoustic Measurements

80dBC (Max)

75dBC

84dBC (Max)

75dBC