Samsung Q6F (IPS) vs Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

Direct comparison

Q6F

PQS9011 / PQS9001 / the one 2026

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.1

6.8

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.8

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    4.7

    6.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    6.4

    7.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    1.8

    6.1

  • Utility functions

    5.9

    7.6

  • Apps

    9.3

    7.2

  • Sound quality

    5.8

    6.9

Advantages

  • Tizen System: Works quickly, doesn't lag and

  • Large app library (Netflix, YouTube, HBO, Disney)

  • IPS matrix provides a good picture even when you're not sitting directly in front

  • Great font readability – good as a large monitor for text work

  • Basic features for gamers: VRR and ALLM

  • Very low input lag

  • Senior-friendly remote: Classic layout with numeric buttons

  • Very attractive price

  • Ambilight, which gives evening viewing sessions a unique ambience and improves the perceived native contrast of the VA panel

  • Excellent panel response time: minimal motion blur of moving objects

  • Many features for gamers: four HDMI 2.1 ports, VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • 144 Hz refresh at 4K and 240 Hz at Full HD from a PC

  • Good coverage of a wide colour gamut: PFS LED

  • Dolby Vision, which genuinely helps the TV with HDR content

  • Decent brightness of around 500 nits, useful for daytime viewing

  • Rotating stand

Disadvantages

No like
  • Brightness of 250 nits is too low to feel any difference in HDR mode

  • Low contrast of the IPS panel ruins night movie sessions

  • Average brightness of 150 nits during the day makes it hard to see anything in a sunny room

  • No optical output

  • Infrared remote (requires aiming at the screen)

  • No local dimming: average blacks in the evening and a limited HDR effect

  • Smaller app library than the competition

  • Poor viewing angles (can be mitigated with a swivel stand)

  • Very high input lag in games with Dolby Vision

  • Significant errors in HDR colour reproduction (no CMS adjustment available)

  • IR remote that requires aiming

Our verdict

Samsung Q6F is a television that’s difficult to assess through the lens of typical QLED models. We must remember that this is a budget offering aimed at a very specific audience. If you’re looking for an inexpensive device with the logo of a well-known manufacturer that simply needs to work, display multimedia, and offer basic remote control with buttons – the Q6F could be an interesting option for you. It’s a great choice for seniors or anyone who needs a large screen “on the cheap” for everyday television, where its IPS panel and good viewing angles really make a difference. However, we must say it plainly: the biggest drawback of this model is its very low brightness and poor blacks. These are the two foundations on which image quality is built, and here they are simply very fragile. It’s definitely not a television we would recommend for watching HDR content – this format exists here in name only. Although the Q6F has a QLED filter and belongs to the Quantum Dot family, fully utilizing the potential of this technology is practically impossible, as the device is technically unsuitable for such content. We know it’s tempting with its very low price and may appeal to many people with modest expectations. However, you should know that the suffix “QLED” suggesting a premium product is, in this case, far from what Samsung has accustomed us to in recent years. It’s a ticket into the world of Samsung, but in a very basic version.

The idea behind The One series has remained practically unchanged for years, and with the Philips PQS9001 this is both an advantage and its biggest weakness. Once again, we get a versatile mid-range TV whose main distinguishing feature is Ambilight. The lighting that follows what is happening on the screen can completely change the atmosphere of an evening movie session, and for many people it will be the main reason to choose this TV. That is hardly surprising, because once you get used to the effect, it can be difficult to go back to watching without it. The picture quality itself is good, but we have already seen a very similar level from this series in previous years. The VA panel provides decent blacks, colours are nicely saturated, and the brightness is sufficient for comfortable viewing in a typical living room. It is a shame, however, that Philips did not take another step forward and introduce at least basic local dimming. In a dark room, blacks can look noticeably bluish, and HDR, while clearly visible, does not make as strong an impression as it could. After so many years of The One being on the market, we would have expected a little more progress here.

There has, however, been a noticeable improvement in Titan OS. Compared with last year, and especially with the version from two years ago, the system has become much more pleasant to use. There are more apps, many smaller functions have been improved, and a number of irritating bugs we previously complained about have been fixed. Overall, it works reasonably well, although we are once again frustrated by the remote control, which still requires you to point it directly at the TV. Philips continues to rely on infrared for regular navigation, even though voice control uses a wireless connection. That makes it even harder to understand why the same connection was not used for navigating the menus. The One also has quite a lot to offer gamers. Four HDMI 2.1 ports and a broad set of gaming features are one thing, but what impressed us most was the panel’s response time. Our unit showed practically no visible smearing, even on dark backgrounds, which is quite rare for an LCD TV with a VA panel. Philips deserves a lot of credit for that. The ability to play at 4K 144 Hz or Full HD 240 Hz also makes the TV an interesting option for PC users. Unfortunately, there is still one unfinished element: using Dolby Vision in games on Xbox results in very high input lag.

The PQS9000 therefore leaves us with mixed feelings. It can surprise with excellent motion handling and shows that Philips has clearly worked on its operating system, but we do not see a similar step forward in picture quality. This is a TV we can recommend primarily to fans of Ambilight. If that lighting system is the main reason you are considering a Philips, then buying The One makes a lot of sense. It is still worth checking, however, whether you can find a Mini LED model with good local dimming at a similar price. Such a TV may offer deeper blacks and more impressive HDR performance. In the end, the choice comes down to what matters more to you: the atmosphere created by Ambilight or better picture quality itself.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

1.9/10

5.8/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,000:1

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,050:1

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,050:1

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,950:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,600:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,750:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

It’s clear here where the manufacturer decided to cut costs. The IPS panel used, despite the support of QLED technology, highlights issues with lack of depth in the image. Results at a level of 1000:1 speak for themselves – the black in this model unfortunately resembles grey. You can try to salvage the situation by turning on the lights in the room, and best of all, placing them directly behind the television, which can somewhat trick our eyes. However, no matter what, the contrast in the Q6F with the IPS panel is simply weak and this will be noticeable in dark scenes.

Black levels and contrast on the Philips PQS9000 are decent for an LCD TV without local dimming. That's mainly down to the VA panel — in our movie scenes contrast often exceeded 5000:1, and at weaker points fell to around 4000:1. That delivers an image with quite good depth and a clear advantage over typical IPS panels, where blacks much more easily look grey. Unfortunately, that's about as far as the panel's capabilities go. The TV has no local dimming, so it can't dim a dark background separately while keeping strong highlights in another part of the screen. All it has is global dimming, which brightens or dims the whole backlight at once. In a completely dark room those limitations become visible: blacks take on a dark navy tint, and shadowy scenes lack the depth of a good screen with zoned local dimming. Thankfully Ambilight helps here. The light on the wall makes on-screen blacks appear deeper and helps mask the panel's glow a little. It doesn't change the TV's actual contrast, but it affects how our eyes perceive it. In this case Ambilight is therefore not just decorative, because it can also make evening viewing more pleasant.

HDR effect quality

3/10

5.5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 87.7%, Bt.2020: 65.7%
DCI P3: 94.5%, Bt.2020: 75.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

152 nit

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

247 nit

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

93 nit

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

256 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

449 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

467 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

487 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

486 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

507 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

Samsung Q6F (IPS)

Unfortunately, the Samsung Q6F is a very dark model. Its peak brightness in HDR does not exceed 250 nits, which is definitely too low to even talk about any "high dynamic range" or HDR effect. In practice, it's better to stick to content in SDR format, which simply looks more predictable on this TV. Another issue is the global dimming technique – in scenes with a lot of black, the TV drastically dims the entire screen to artificially improve the black levels. This results in the image becoming even darker, with brightness sometimes dropping below 100 nits. The only consolation is the QLED technology, but even here it's average. The applied quantum dot layer is not of the highest quality, as the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut does not exceed 90%. Because of this, colours in HDR content may simply appear unsaturated.

The Philips PQS9000 is a moderately bright TV — in our HDR scenes it reached roughly 450 to just over 500 nits. That’s enough to notice a difference compared with SDR. Sun reflections, lamps or flares have a bit more punch than on basic TVs, whose brightness often tops out around 300 nits. It’s not, however, a level where bright elements look especially striking. The biggest limitation remains contrast. Without local dimming, brightening a bright object also lifts the black level around it. So there’s no clear separation between strong highlights and a dark background, and it’s that kind of pairing that really shows what HDR can do. The PQS9000 offers more than the cheapest models, but despite decent brightness the effect remains fairly basic.

Colours

Philips deserves praise for the colours. Although the manufacturer markets this model as QLED, it actually uses a PFS phosphor instead of quantum dots. The solution itself doesn’t prevent good results. On test patterns and in measurements of film scenes we recorded about 94% DCI-P3 coverage and 75% BT.2020. For this class of TV that’s really good. In practice this means the vast majority of colours used in HDR films and series will have appropriate saturation. Lush greens or intense reds aren’t a problem and add appeal to the picture. Limitations are easier to notice in some games and rarer content that use the most saturated shades of the wide BT.2020 gamut. In those situations, displays with wider colour coverage, such as SQD or RGB LED, can show more. At its price point the PQS9000 has nothing to be ashamed of.

Factory color reproduction

5.1/10

5.1/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the television in Filmmaker mode, which showed us two completely different sides of this model. Looking at SDR content, we were honestly shocked at how good this television looks straight out of the box. It was really hard to pick on anything here. Despite a slight 'messiness' in white balance and some slightly brightened details in the blacks (which directly stems from the IPS panel construction), colour errors hovered around the '2' level. This is not only a surprisingly good result but rather phenomenal, considering the price of the device.

On the other hand, what the Q6F showed in terms of colours when switched to HDR mode was a very unpleasant surprise. The errors in colour reproduction and palette were so massive that our charts literally ran out of scale. Of course, since Samsung even in such a budget model offers very extensive calibration options, we decided to approach the issue professionally and see what could be done during calibration.

The factory picture settings for Movie mode on the PQS9000 unfortunately need tweaking. In SDR the biggest problem is an excess of red in the white balance, which makes whites, greys and skin tones too warm, in places even slightly pink. Gamma runs below the reference across most of the range. The TV therefore brightens midtones and highlights, making the image look flatter than it should.

In HDR the white balance itself performs significantly better. Apart from minor deviations the components sit close together, so there isn’t the same obvious tint as in SDR. The EOTF curve, however, shows a slight brightening of parts of the image, and the biggest issue appears when measuring the wide colour gamut. Many shades deviate substantially from the target, with errors reaching ΔE 8–9. The good gamut coverage we praised earlier therefore doesn’t mean the TV hits specific colours accurately. It can display a wide range of colours, but out of the box it doesn’t use that range very precisely.

Color reproduction after calibration

6.5/10

7.7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After our calibration, the colours in SDR mode looked even better – the result is truly surprising, as colour errors at a level of "1" are something typically seen in devices costing several thousand dollars. In this respect, the Q6F is really a great screen for everyday television, less demanding series, or movies. Unfortunately, our intervention in HDR mode did not yield a noticeable improvement. The television, due to its weak blacks and low coverage of a wide colour gamut, still has significant issues with proper colour saturation, especially reds. This is an example of a device where HDR primarily exists as a label on the box – for everyday use, we definitely recommend watching content in SDR format.

Calibration brought a big improvement, especially with SDR content. We managed to even out the white balance and remove the earlier colour cast, and the Color Checker measurements now look very good. Colours are much closer to what they should be on screen, so with regular TV or SDR movies we can be happy with the result. Unfortunately HDR spoils that a bit. On the one hand it's limited by the panel itself, because calibration won't improve contrast or replace local dimming. On the other hand there are colour errors we couldn't correct because the CMS settings, i.e. colour management, were greyed out and inactive. That loses Philips points with us. The white balance can be fine-tuned, but without access to wide gamut controls you can't as effectively sort out colours in HDR. It's a shame, because the SDR results show the potential is there, but we weren't allowed to fully make use of it everywhere.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

9/10

8.6/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Samsung Q6F handles the phenomenon of posterization very well. In most scenes, the colour transitions are smooth and there are no problematic "steps" when blending colours. Only in very extreme moments, particularly in scenes with brightness close to pure grey, can slight banding be noticed. However, to be honest, we personally found the issue of slight clouding (uneven backlighting) and the poor contrast of the IPS panel to be much more bothersome than the tonal transitions themselves.

Philips PQS9000 handles tonal transitions very well. It looks especially good in dark scenes, where shades blend smoothly into one another without visible banding or clear boundaries between colours. As a result, even on large, uniform areas the image looks smooth. Minor imperfections only appear in the brighter tones, but you have to look closely to notice them. During normal viewing they are unlikely to distract from the film. In this category, Philips performs really well.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Q6F handles upscaling lower resolution content to native 4K very well. The scaling is surprisingly good, even for such an inexpensive QLED model. The only downside is when watching very low-resolution materials like 576p (typical for old DVD players) – the image may appear slightly cropped. This is because the TV does not allow the option to turn off the Overscan feature, which is a common issue with Samsung devices.

The situation is completely different when it comes to digital processing, or the attempt to smooth the image of unwanted artifacts. Here, the TV completely fails. Although in the menu we find a feature called "Noise Reduction," it does not produce any noticeable results regardless of the slider setting. The only thing it seems to do is introduce undesirable errors into the image. Despite its presence in the system, we definitely do not recommend using it.

Digital image processing on the Philips PQS9000 performs well, although we have a few reservations. The "Distortion Reduction" function helps smooth tonal transitions in lower-quality sources, but it works rather unevenly. It can improve one part of the picture, only to, moments later and still within the same scene, lose its way and show banding between shades again. On the plus side, it doesn't strip away film grain or fine noise, so the image retains its texture. We found the "Medium" setting worked best and that's the one we recommend.

The upscaling to 4K itself is adequate, though the image is very soft. Edges are heavily smoothed, which may leave some viewers wanting more clarity. In that case, it's worth slightly increasing the sharpness in the TV menu, as this will help emphasise edges more. Don't overdo the sharpness slider, though, or you'll get artificial halos instead of an improvement.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.6/10

8.1/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
49%
0%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (1080p@240Hz):

The 60 Hz panel in the Samsung Q6F is standard in this price range, making it a rather average model for dynamic sports or gaming. However, when it comes to movies, the TV performs quite well thanks to its smoothing feature. The "Motion Vibration Reduction" option allows you to adjust the motion smoothness to your own preferences – from preserving a cinematic feel to full smoothness.

In terms of motion handling the Philips PQS9000 performs exceptionally well for an LCD TV. It's not just about the 144 Hz refresh rate, but above all how quickly the panel itself responds. At 120 Hz you can hardly see the typical trailing smears behind moving objects. What's particularly pleasing is that this also applies to darker backgrounds, where many VA panels clearly struggle. Here motion remains clear, and in this respect Philips has pleasantly surprised us.

The "Motion Styles" feature is used to adjust how motion is displayed. It includes two sliders: "Smoothness" and "Blur Reduction", allowing you to tailor the effect to the material you're watching and your personal preferences. Our suggested settings are shown in the photo. Treat them as a starting point and see which level of smoothing suits you best.

Console compatibility and gaming features

5.3/10

9.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 240Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

We won’t beat around the bush – the Q6F is not a television designed with gamers in mind. While it does include features like ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode) and VRR frame syncing for consoles, that's pretty much where the list of advantages ends. Beyond these basics, the television offers nothing more that could satisfy those who spend a lot of time in front of a console. It's a real shame that a useful tool like Game Bar, which allows for quick control of game parameters in higher-end Samsung models, is missing here. In terms of gaming, this is an absolutely basic model and it will only suit 'casual' gamers.

Features for gamers

In terms of gaming features the Philips PQS9000 has a lot to offer. Four HDMI 2.1 ports let you connect multiple devices without having to choose which one gets the full capabilities. Consoles can use 120 Hz at Full HD, 1440p and 4K, and a PC can also run 144 Hz at 4K or 240 Hz if you drop to Full HD. There's also VRR, which matches the refresh rate to the frame rate and prevents screen tearing. Its range runs from 48 to 240 Hz, with the upper limit applying to Full HD mode.

It also includes ALLM, so the TV switches itself into game mode, and a properly working HGiG, which is handy when setting HDR on the console. There's a Game Bar for quick access to settings and signal information. The list even includes Dolby Vision gaming, but it's hard to enjoy because of very high input lag. Apart from that caveat, the feature set is really solid.

Input lag

10/10

7.2/10

SDR

1080p60
11 ms
32 ms
1080p120
16 ms
2160p60
11 ms
32 ms
2160p120
16 ms

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
32 ms
2160p120
16 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
213 ms
2160p120 DV
106 ms

As a consolation for the modest list of features for gamers, it's worth mentioning that the Q6F has absolutely no issues with input lag. The response to the controller's movements is immediate, and the television does not introduce any additional delay regardless of the resolution we are currently playing in. In this respect, the control is very precise and comfortable, which is a big plus in this class of equipment.

Input lag is less impressive than the rest of the gaming hardware. At 60 Hz we measured 32 ms, both in SDR and HDR. That's enough for more relaxed games, but in fast shooters you can already feel a slight lag. At 120 Hz the delay drops to 16 ms and gaming is noticeably more pleasant, though rivals can respond even faster. The biggest problem appears when Dolby Vision is enabled. At 60 Hz the delay is as much as 213 ms, and at 120 Hz it reaches 106 ms. The response to controller input is then clearly delayed, which seriously disrupts gameplay. So with the PQS9000 it's definitely better to stick with HDR10. Dolby Vision is supported in games, but its practical usefulness remains limited.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
11ms
16ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Although the Q6F isn't a screen designed specifically for PC gaming, it deserves praise for how well it handles font display. As a monitor for text work, browsing websites, or daily news reading, the television performs exceptionally well. The readability of text is at a very high level, thanks to the proper implementation of the Chroma 4:4:4 signal and the use of an IPS panel. If you're looking for a cheap, large screen for office work, the Q6F holds up really well in this regard. Especially since Samsung offers very good integration with the Windows system and built-in Microsoft Office tools.

The PQS9000 earns a high mark for PC use mainly thanks to its gaming capabilities. Its 144 Hz refresh rate at 4K and support for G-Sync Compatible and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro let you synchronise frames on compatible NVIDIA and AMD cards. Working with text also fares well. Regular fonts are sharp and legible, and with proper 4:4:4 chroma support coloured letters, icons and small desktop elements do not lose their clarity. The biggest caveat concerns very small, dark text: the horizontal strokes of letters are noticeably darker than the vertical ones, which makes some characters look uneven. You probably won't notice this from the couch, but if someone plans to put The One on their desk and work up close, that flaw may become annoying.

Viewing angles

5.6/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
78%
68%

The viewing angles are one of the better aspects of the Q6F model, which is directly attributed to the use of an IPS matrix. They are much better than in televisions based on VA panel technology. As a result, the image viewed at an angle remains clear and does not become "washed out" or faded. However, it is worth noting that while the colours look really good, the drop in brightness at a greater angle is already quite noticeable. Nonetheless, this is a solid result for those who don't always sit directly in front of the screen.

Viewing angles are one of the weakest points of the Philips PQS9001. Just move to the side and the colours noticeably lose saturation, and the image looks washed out and loses contrast. When watching with several people, seats directly in front of the screen will therefore be by far the best.

Unfortunately, this is a typical trait of VA panels. Good contrast when viewed head-on comes at the expense of poorer off‑axis performance. Most TVs with that panel have a similar problem and The One is no exception. The rotating stand helps a little by letting you angle the screen toward the viewer, but with widely spaced seats it won't solve the issue.

Daytime performance

1.8/10

6.1/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026): 502 cd/m2

Samsung Q6F (IPS): 125 cd/m2

What more can I say – aside from the satin finish of the panel, which barely reduces reflections, the Q6F is dark enough that it’s not suitable even for moderately lit rooms. A brightness of around 150 nits is simply astronomically low by today’s standards. With such a result, any larger light source in the room will make the image hard to read. This is definitely not a model for a sunlit living room.

Philips PQS9001 performs quite well for daytime viewing. The biggest advantage is a stable brightness of around 500 nits, regardless of how many bright elements appear on the screen. Even when watching winter sports or an all-white scene, the picture doesn't dim. In a typical living room that level is more than enough to comfortably watch TV without having to block out the windows.

The satin finish does a decent job of reducing reflections, though it doesn't remove them completely. A window opposite the screen will be visible and can be distracting, especially in darker scenes. Blacks hold up well in daylight, so the image doesn't become overly washed out. For everyday viewing it's therefore quite good, as long as the sun isn't shining directly on the screen.

Panel details

Backlight Type
QLED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-KSU2EFDEUC-0090-1110.7
TPM267E_V167.002.054.151
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV Panel details
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV Panel details

Samsung Q6F (IPS)

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

TV features

5.9/10

7.6/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Titan OS
  • System performance
    Decent
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV features
Review Samsung Q6F (IPS) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)
    Bluetooth, Samsung Q-Symphony (Speaker extension)

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

It’s really great that Samsung TVs – even the most budget-friendly ones – the Tizen system simply doesn’t slow down. The speed of operation isn’t quite on par with the most expensive models, but it’s definitely better than Google TV at a similar price. Thanks to Tizen, we have access to a truly vast library of apps, AirPlay, and other Smart TV features.

It’s worth noting that the remote control included with the Q6F is an older yet somewhat modernised version of the classic Samsung infrared controller, equipped with a full numeric keypad. Although it works via infrared, it has plenty of buttons, which might appeal to older users who watch traditional television – it simply makes channel switching easier. We also find a clear EPG interface, teletext, and support for Bluetooth headphones. It sounds a bit like a senior's dream come true, and there’s definitely something to that.

However, we must note a serious shortcoming regarding connections: this model lacks an optical output for audio devices. The only option available is an HDMI eARC connection, which could be a significant hassle if we have an external audio system.

Titan OS in this year’s The One shows that Philips has been working on its system. Compared with last year’s version, many little things and functions that didn’t work properly before have been fixed. Now we can easily use AirPlay, mirror a computer screen via Miracast, or do voice searches in Polish. The system itself runs decently, though it’s far from the fastest. The app library has also grown. It includes Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, CANAL+, Apple TV and YouTube. The selection is still smaller than on Google TV, but when using popular services Titan increasingly gives fewer reasons to complain.

Classic features also show an improvement in everyday convenience. You can connect Bluetooth headphones and listen through them at the same time as the TV speakers. There’s also a mode that turns off the screen and leaves only the audio. Recording to USB and picture-in-picture (PiP) are missing. What’s most disappointing is the remote. Despite backlit buttons, it still controls the TV via infrared, so you have to point it at the screen. The system has picked up a number of useful fixes, but that part of the user experience remains unchanged and can be irritating in everyday use.

Apps

9.3/10

7.2/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.3/10

8.6/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
No
6 Mpix
Yes
No
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

When it comes to handling multimedia from external sources, the Samsung Q6F performs exceptionally well, especially considering that we are dealing with a closed system. The TV has no issues with most popular video, audio, or image formats (EVEN HEIC!). The media player operates steadily and quickly loads the contents of USB drives or network servers. It's a solid device for browsing your own film archives or home photo galleries.

The built-in USB player runs quickly and smoothly and handles most of the files we tested without trouble. Music playback is solid, from common MP3s to FLAC files, including 96 kHz/24-bit. It's perfectly adequate for everyday media playback from a USB stick. However, our biggest complaint is again the handling of photos. The player is quite selective about resolution: it opened our 8, 16 and 32 Mpix files but failed with, among others, 4, 12 and 24 Mpix. It's hard to find any logic in that when a larger photo works but a smaller one doesn't. That can be annoying when browsing holiday photos.

Sound

5.8/10

6.9/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    96dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

When it comes to sound, the Samsung Q6F plays... well, flat. However, the sound is clear and loud enough that it's perfectly suitable for watching news or regular television. The voices of the presenters are understandable and don't get lost in the background. However, if someone values even decent experiences when watching films, we definitely recommend purchasing a soundbar. Even the cheapest model from the Korean manufacturer's range will make a huge difference and save the situation.

The Philips PQS9001 has a 2.0 audio system with a total power of 40 W, that is, two 10 W speakers on each side. It sounds fairly good and definitely better than most budget TVs. There's plenty of volume, but the sound itself lacks depth. The biggest issue is the lack of low end, so explosions in films or heavier sections of music don't have the proper weight.

High frequencies aren't reproduced evenly either. Measurements show a noticeable dip around 2 kHz, then a boost at 6-7 kHz and a drop above about 8 kHz. That can emphasise sibilance and add a bit of harshness to the sound, despite the rolled-off top end. It's fine for everyday viewing, but for films and music it's worth considering additional audio. All the more so because the TV supports spatial audio formats, including Dolby Atmos and DTS. A compatible soundbar or AV receiver will make better use of those formats than the built-in speakers.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

0dBC (Max)

75dBC

96dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy