SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) vs SHARP JP7765E

Direct comparison

S95F / FAT / FAE

Info

JP7

Available screen sizes: 55”65”77”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Panel type: QD-OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.8

6.2

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    9.3

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    9.3

    6.0

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.9

    3.9

  • Gaming on console

    9.9

    6.1

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.8

    5.0

  • Watching in bright light

    7.1

    7.3

  • Utility functions

    7.9

    6.4

  • Apps

    9.3

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    8.0

    6.0

Advantages

  • Perfect black and outstanding contrast

  • High brightness of the image

  • Amazing image quality after calibration

  • Ultra-fast QD-OLED 165 Hz panel

  • Best choice for gamers – full support for HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, and HGiG, with input lag of just 5 ms (highest rating on the portal!)

  • Best reflection suppression thanks to the matte screen finish

  • Wide viewing angles without loss of quality – top level thanks to the QD-OLED panel

  • Intuitive and fast Tizen operating system with a rich set of features

  • Modern and elegant design

  • One Connect module for easy and aesthetic cable management

  • Good black and contrast – mini-LED backlighting with a VA panel

  • High brightness – will handle bright living rooms

  • Google TV system – unlimited app base and smart features

  • Very good file player – plays almost everything

  • Mini-jack output – rare and useful headphone connection

  • Extremely loud – up to 90 dB (ideal for seniors)

  • Very attractive price

Disadvantages

No like
  • No support for DTS:X (home theatre)

  • No USB recording from built-in tuners

  • Cherry black effect in very difficult lighting conditions

  • Massive trailing and only a 60Hz panel

  • Poor mini-LED local dimming algorithms

  • Narrow viewing angles (a natural characteristic of VA panels)

  • No VRR and HGiG – features for gamers

  • Odd sound – the audio has a "hole" in the dialogues

Our verdict

Samsung S95F is an excellent continuation and an improvement on last year's S95D model. Thanks to the QD-OLED panel, we receive a picture that captivates from the first minutes of viewing. The blacks are deep and natural, without any traces of backlighting, and the brightness of the new generation panel reaches levels that not long ago seemed beyond the reach of OLEDs. These values are high enough that the S95F can confidently be compared with the best Mini-LED screens – both in terms of HDR effect and in everyday use in strong daylight. After a slight adjustment of settings, the TV can offer reference image quality, creating a cohesive and cinematic experience. However, it is not just a screen for movie lovers, but also one of the absolute favourites for gamers. The 165 Hz panel with rapid response, input lag of just a few milliseconds, a full suite of gaming features – including VRR, ALLM and excellently implemented HGiG – along with four HDMI 2.1 ports make the S95F effortlessly meet the requirements of both next-gen console owners and PC gamers. It offers a range of capabilities that make the S95F one of the best gaming TVs on the market. Samsung has also taken care of practical details. The matte screen coating effectively eliminates reflections, ensuring that even in a bright living room, the picture remains clear and comfortable. The One Connect module organizes the cables, moving all connections to a separate box, which will be appreciated by anyone who likes to regularly juggle connected devices. The design of the TV is slim, elegant and well thought out – it is evident that this is a Super Premium class product that looks great in any interior. Of course, like any equipment, the S95F has its minor compromises, but at this level and completeness, it is easy to forget about them.

This is a TV that combines the best image quality with functionality and user comfort. Undoubtedly, it competes with the strongest rivals, and can confidently be regarded as one of the main contenders for the title of TV of the Year 2025.

Sharp JP7765 is yet another offering in the market that tries to prove that Mini-LED technology doesn't have to cost a fortune. The low price is matched by an exceptionally high brightness – a peak of 1000 nits in HDR is a result that is simply impressive in this price range. Although the proprietary processor doesn't always handle backlighting management in demanding scenes perfectly, support for Dolby Vision effectively saves the day. With dynamic metadata, the picture becomes vivid, deep, and simply attractive to the eye. Adding to this the Google TV system, extreme volume, and a rarely found headphone jack, we have a device that is a brilliant option for seniors or less demanding viewers switching from a regular, cheap LCD. In such a scenario, the Sharp JP7 presents itself as a really good and cost-effective choice. However, it's necessary to state the matter clearly: contrary to marketing slogans, this isn't gear for everyone. Gamers or sports fans will definitely not find this suitable. The biggest drawback of the JP7765 model is the slow, 60Hz panel and significant motion blur, which essentially disqualifies this TV for watching fast-paced matches or playing quick titles. The image loses sharpness during rapid movements to such an extent that for a football or racing fan, this could be an unacceptable barrier.

So who is the Sharp JP7765 for? It's a sensible option for budget-conscious individuals who don't have high demands for motion fluidity but value a "kick" of brightness. By choosing the Sharp JP7, you'll definitely make a better deal than buying basic (non-dimming) TVs from competitors. At a similar price, rivals usually offer standard LCD panels that can't compete with the capabilities of even such a basic Mini-LED model as the JP7. Ultimately, it comes down to a simple equation: you accept poorer motion fluidity in exchange for immense brightness, which is hard to find with other manufacturers at this price.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Super Premium
Average
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Silver
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand, One Connect Box
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

7.3/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 160 (10 x 16)

Contrast:

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

64,100:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

18,250:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

46,350:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

7,000:1

Review SHARP JP7765E Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The Samsung S95F with a QD-OLED panel shows that when it comes to blacks and contrast, it's hard to find anything better. Even the first test scenes prove that this television can achieve absolute black, while simultaneously delivering the tiniest points of light flawlessly. The effect is stunning – a star-filled sky looks as if it’s been directly transported from an observatory, and the film's darkness takes on depth and drama. Details in the shadows are preserved with reference-level accuracy, making home cinema viewing gain a new dimension.

When it comes to what’s most important in Mini-LEDs, namely contrast and black levels, the Sharp JP7 in the 55-inch size we've tested uses a VA panel. Combined with backlighting divided into 160 zones (in a 10x16 layout), this promises really solid performance. Measurements on static film test patterns can be downright shocking, with reported contrast reaching five-digit values, even hitting levels of 50,000:1. On paper, this is a result that even much more expensive models would envy, and black levels under such conditions look very appealing.

Unfortunately, a TV is bought for watching movies, not for admiring static test patterns, and here the magic tends to fade. When something more begins to happen on the screen – especially in complex, dark scenes with a lot of small, bright elements – the backlight system in the JP7 starts to literally go haywire. Zones can "dance" before the viewer's eyes, flickering on and off in a manner that can be just plain annoying and distracts from the action. It is clear that Sharp has a huge area for improvement regarding local dimming management. The hardware potential in the form of Mini-LEDs is substantial, but the control algorithms clearly struggle to tame them.

HDR effect quality

8.7/10

5.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 99.3%, Bt.2020: 87.1%
DCI P3: 94.0%, Bt.2020: 70.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

2044 nit

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

2159 nit

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

2167 nit

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

2180 nit

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1427 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

1014 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

247 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

606 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

180 nit

Review SHARP JP7765E Brightness measurement

Result

605 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

SHARP JP7765E

SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED)

The new generation of QD-OLED panels in Samsung's S95F showcases its full potential, and the brightness results are simply astounding. In test film scenes, such as “Life of Pi” or “Sicario 2”, where smaller light elements appear – stars, the moon, or spotlights – the television managed to achieve over 2000 nits of brightness. This is a result that surpasses even most top Mini-LED models.

The secret lies in the technology itself – instead of a limited number of dimming zones like in Mini-LED televisions, here we have millions of glowing pixels, allowing the television to fully demonstrate its power without technological compromises. Of course, since it is still an organic panel, in scenes that are full-screen and flooded with white – like in the final sequence from The Meg – brightness drops to around 1400 nits. Nevertheless, the result remains excellent and definitely exceeds what any OLEDs, both QD-OLED and WOLED, have offered so far. The colour reproduction is also particularly noteworthy. Thanks to QD-OLED technology, the television achieves almost 100% coverage of the DCI-P3 colour space and around 80% in BT.2020. These values make HDR images not only dazzling in brightness but also stunning in their range of colours.

So how does the brightness of the Sharp JP7 perform in the most demanding titles? Honestly, we were quite surprised at first. The TV is able to achieve over 1000 nits of brightness, which is an outstanding and rare result for a device costing just under 2000 zł (for 55 inches). Watching bright, full-screen scenes, you can get the impression that you are dealing with really good equipment. But unfortunately, we have to return to the issue we mentioned earlier, which is local dimming management. When small, bright spots appear on a dark background (like in test scenes from the films Life of Pi or Sicario 2), it’s clear how poorly the JP7 handles these zones. The TV dims them almost to the maximum, crushing the whole HDR effect, which at such moments resembles a flat SDR image (less than 200 nits). This instability means that in demanding, contrast-rich films, the image on the JP7 unfortunately loses its appeal.

As a consolation, it's worth noting that the panel has the potential to display colours well. A PFS (phosphor) filter has been employed here, which allows the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut to reach a solid 94%. The manufacturer calls its product a “QLED,” even though it technologically relies mainly on the aforementioned PFS filter. Considering the recent market battles between manufacturers over what can and cannot be called QLED, we leave the issue of the correctness of this terminology to your judgement. However, it remains a fact that the potential for reproducing saturated colours in this panel is simply good.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

4/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best picture mode straight out of the box is undoubtedly Filmmaker Mode – a mode that Samsung has been using for several years and which is intended to faithfully convey the creators' vision. In SDR content, its implementation is not bad, although some imperfections can be noticed. The image is slightly dimmed, and the screen has a subtle pinkish hue resulting from an excess of red and blue in the white balance. Colour errors remained at a level of 3–4 ΔE units – and for the uninitiated: a value above 3 is the threshold where the average human eye starts to notice differences.

Much bigger problems arise in HDR content, however. Here, the white balance was not as much of an issue – a slight excess of blue did not significantly hinder things. The problem became brightness management. In practice, the TV "blows out" the image too much, causing details in the blacks to completely disappear. The final effect was far from what was expected, and the colour errors in this mode became quite significant. It’s hard to say why such a design decision was made, but it was clear that the factory HDR settings do not allow this TV to showcase its full potential.

When it comes to colours straight out of the box, the Sharp JP7 was tested in the Film mode, which traditionally offers the most cohesive image compared to the yellowed “Eco” mode or the glaring blue of the “Dynamic” mode. Although this is the best choice among the available settings, the results still fall short of ideal. The white balance clearly lacked red and blue components, causing many scenes to take on an unnatural, greenish hue. Another issue was the gamma – in full-screen scenes, the TV produced excessively bright images, completely robbing it of its cinematic character. All of this resulted in colour reproduction errors, especially in shades of grey, which exceeded the Delta E 10 value. To remind you: errors above 2-3 are already noticeable to the human eye, so here we are dealing with a significant distortion of reality.

In HDR mode, the situation is reversed, but not in a better way. Here, the white balance is dominated by blue, giving the image an unnatural, almost “store-like” sharpness, reminiscent of aggressive demonstration modes. Moreover, the measurements of the EOTF curve emphasise the store-like nature of the image. The graph clearly shows that the TV generates images that are significantly brighter than the standards predict, resulting in an artificially boosted and unrealistic final effect. The Sharp JP7 is evidently trying to appear stronger than it actually is, but it does so at the expense of fidelity to the original content.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.4/10

6.7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, it was possible to make subtle adjustments to the white balance and significantly improve the image characteristics. In SDR content, the quality has become practically reference-level – most colour errors have dropped below a ΔE value of 1, which is the level at which the human eye can no longer perceive differences. This is a result that places the S95F among the absolute top TV models available on the market.

In HDR material, calibration also brought a significant improvement. The tendency of the TV to blow out the image was managed, as confirmed by the analysis of the EOTF curve. There is still a slight tendency to brighten the entire scene or occasional loss of detail in the blacks, but this does not significantly affect the overall perception. After calibration, the S95F shows its full potential and can be regarded as one of the best TVs on the market!

We subjected the JP7 to our standard calibration procedure and honestly... the television gained a second life thanks to it, especially with SDR content (YouTube, traditional television, series, or older films). With our precise adjustments to the white balance and stabilisation of the gamma, colour errors dropped to a value of below 3. This is a level at which the human eye struggles to perceive discrepancies. In this scenario, the Sharp JP7 delivers an image with truly excellent colour accuracy, which is a significant advantage in this price range. However, the HDR content turned out to be much more problematic. Here, despite our efforts and interventions in the settings, the television simply refused to cooperate. In the JP7 menu, we won’t find any option to effectively control how brightness is managed (EOTF). Although a significant portion of the colour errors has been reduced, the image still remained unnaturally oversaturated. It’s a bit disappointing because the potential of the mini-LED backlit panel is great, but the software presents a clear barrier.

The conclusion is simple: when watching less demanding content (SDR) on the JP7, you can expect an image that is more than satisfactory, but in HDR you will have to accept a certain degree of "artificiality" that cannot be bypassed even with professional equipment.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.9/10

7.5/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The Samsung S95F with a QD-OLED panel handles tonal transitions really well. It's hard to find any serious issues here – the colour gradation is smooth, and the image looks natural. Only in very dark scenes and shades close to black can you notice some slight imperfections, but they don't matter much during everyday viewing. The overall impression is that the fluidity of transitions is at a very high level and doesn't distract the viewer's attention.

When it comes to image clarity, posterisation on the Sharp JP7 fortunately doesn’t distract too much from the content being viewed. In most scenes, it’s hard to spot annoying stripes or the so-called “jaggies” of colour, which often ruin the experience during scenes with smooth colours. Of course, you can't expect miracles here, as in some extremely demanding scenes, a trained eye might notice issues in the tonal transitions. However, it’s not at a level that would realistically distract during a film. Well, unless you have good eyesight and are looking for artefacts on the screen – then you’ll probably find something.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

3.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Samsung S95F offers a noise reduction feature that smooths tonal transitions. It works very effectively, but in practice, it can be too aggressive. Materials of lower quality – e.g. older recordings or videos from YouTube – become soft and plastic when it is enabled, resembling an image digitally smoothed in graphic software. Unfortunately, the natural film grain, which often adds authenticity to the image, disappears in the process. Fortunately, the television does not lose too much fine detail, e.g. in skin textures or environmental elements. Therefore, this feature is best used judiciously – depending on preferences, one can achieve a smooth but less natural image or one that is truer to the original. In our opinion, the most universal choice is the “Standard” setting.

Image scaling performs significantly better. The television handles lower resolution materials well – even 576p content looks quite decent, though slight blockiness can be observed. Overall, the effect is very good, although it slightly trails behind what Sony Bravia 8 (II) or LG G5 can achieve. It’s also worth mentioning a small imperfection of the S95F – in older materials, overscan may occur, causing a slight trimming of the left edge of the image.

When it comes to lower quality materials and how Sharp JP7 handles them, the situation is ambiguous. Let's start with the upscaling itself – here we have no major objections. The process of scaling the image to a higher resolution is correct; the picture remains readable and clear, without the overscan effect, which means no cropped edges. Of course, it's not at the level of top models and at times you can notice slight tearing on the edges, but in this price range, the effect is fully acceptable.

However, the actual digital image processing performs much worse, as aside from the scaling, it practically doesn’t exist. In the JP7 menu, we won’t find any options that would effectively smooth out unwanted tonal transitions or reduce noise in the image. As a result, the signal hits the panel in a very raw form, which with heavily compressed materials (e.g., from YouTube) results in noticeable posterisation. Either this is a programming error or a very strange design decision, because in earlier Sharp models this function was available and, more importantly, worked with noticeable effect. Here, we are stuck with what the source delivers, without any digital support from the image processor.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

2/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
165Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
-
BFI function 120Hz
No
-
Brightness drop with BFI
50%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@165Hz):

Blur ():

The Samsung S95F excels in motion fluidity, presenting phenomenal performance. The panel operates at a native resolution of 4K with a refresh rate of up to 165 Hz, and when combined with QD-OLED organic technology, it delivers incredible results. Sports and games look sensational – the picture is fast, dynamic, and very natural. Additionally, the built-in motion smoother and blur reduction system allow you to customise the character of the image to your own preferences. You can opt for a more 'framey' effect with visible film texture or a smooth, cinematic spectacle. Every viewer will find a setting that suits them.

The motion fluidity on the Sharp JP7 is quite average, and the reason is simple: the TV uses a 60Hz panel. This immediately makes it hard to recommend for watching sports or serious gaming, where higher refresh rates are already the standard. The only real plus is the presence of a motion smoother, which we can control in films with a slider called De-judder. Lower settings give a more raw, “cinematic” (framey) image, while higher ones add artificial fluidity. We suggest setting it somewhere in the middle of the scale, around 3-5 – this is the best compromise to avoid the soap opera effect while also getting rid of the annoying image skipping. Interestingly, in the menu, we also find a slider for "motion blur reduction," which usually indicates the presence of a 120Hz panel. However, in the case of the JP7, it doesn’t actually enhance the image and serves more as a dummy – it looks good in the settings, but technically it shouldn’t work on this panel.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

4/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    48 - 165Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The same advantages of low motion blur and excellent motion fluidity characteristic of OLED panels are just the beginning, as the Samsung S95F has been designed with gamers in mind. The manufacturer has equipped it with four HDMI 2.1 ports – though limited to a bandwidth of 40 Gb/s, in practice, this has no impact on compatibility with consoles or PCs. We get a full package of gaming features: variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic game mode (ALLM), as well as a very well-implemented HGiG standard, ensuring that HDR titles look as the creators intended. This is complemented by Game Bar – a clear settings hub, where with one motion, we can preview and change all key image parameters. The proprietary motion smoother Game Motion Plus also deserves praise, as it can smooth out animation, which is especially useful in productions running at 60 frames, where stability is not always exemplary. While there is no support for Dolby Vision in games, it’s hard to consider this a serious drawback – Samsung compensates with other solutions. This is one of the best, if not the best, gaming TVs available on the market today.

As we mentioned earlier, the 60Hz panel is not a feature that will attract gamers to the Sharp JP7. Perhaps for the casual gamer, whose console still generates most titles at 60 frames per second, there might be something interesting? When it comes to specific additions, we find here:

  • ALLM mode: Automatically switches the TV to low latency game mode (input lag).

  • Player menu: Which is hard to call a fully-fledged “Game Bar,” as the functionality is minimal. Aside from enabling ALLM, there’s only a dedicator for gaming which we advise against as it introduces very noticeable artifacts and spoils responsiveness.

  • Dolby Vision Gaming: For Microsoft's consoles.

Unfortunately, the list of shortcomings is much longer and more painful than the positives. The biggest disappointment is the lack of support for 120Hz, even when reducing the resolution to Full HD. The presence of 120Hz would allow for performance modes to be activated in many games on the PS5 or Xbox Series X. Another shortcoming is the VRR, which means that during frame drops, we are susceptible to screen tearing. Very problematic is also the lack of proper implementation of the HGiG standard. This results in the fact that during HDR calibration in the console menu, it is very easy to "overshoot" the brightness settings. As a result, instead of clear details in the highlights, we end up with an unnaturally oversaturated image with cut-off details. The Sharp JP7 is a proposal only for those who game very occasionally.

Input lag

10/10

9.3/10

SDR

1080p60
10 ms
13 ms
1080p120
5 ms
29 ms
2160p60
10 ms
13 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
9 ms
13 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
2160p120 DV

The input lag on the S95F is at a level where it’s hard to even talk about lag. 5 ms at 120 Hz content means there’s no space for hesitation between pressing a button and the response on the screen. It’s pure immediacy. And if someone’s worried about the 60 Hz mode – don’t stress, there we’re talking about 10 ms, which is still a figure that places the TV in the absolute top tier and gives no reason for complaints.

The issue of input lag in the Sharp JP7 is quite intriguing. In all 60Hz modes, the TV boasts a mere 13 ms result. This is truly an excellent result, making the lag practically unnoticeable during gameplay. In this regard, Sharp has risen to the occasion, and even in dynamic titles, the controls remain responsive.

However, during our tests, we encountered a certain technical conundrum. Using our professional Murideo generator, we were able to force and measure input lag at 120Hz refresh rate in Full HD resolution. This sounds promising, but in reality, it is merely a 'paper' curiosity, as standard external devices like consoles or computers were unable to coax the Sharp into operating in that mode. Although professional diagnostic tools see some hidden potential here, for the end user, the JP7 remains just a 60Hz screen.

Compatibility with PC

8.8/10

5/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
5ms
13ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
BGR
Max refresh rate
165Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

S95F with a QD-OLED panel is a true magnet for PC gamers. The 165 Hz refresh rate combined with virtually negligible input lag and full support for G-Sync and FreeSync means the TV functions like a top-tier monitor. Dynamic action games, shooters, and racing games gain fluidity and responsiveness that are hard to find in competing models. When working with text, you may notice a subtle rainbow halo around letters, characteristic of the sub-pixel layout of QD-OLED, but thanks to proper handling of chroma 4:4:4, everything remains readable and does not interfere with everyday use.

Sharp JP7 performs moderately as a monitor. While the readability of standard fonts on a white or black background is acceptable, the clarity significantly drops with darker and thinner text, making it difficult to work with text for extended periods. For occasional browsing of news in the browser, this panel is sufficient; however, we definitely do not recommend it as a permanent screen for PC gaming. Besides the rigid limit of 60Hz, the television does not support any form of frame synchronization (no G-Sync or FreeSync), which combined with the significant motion blur of the panel makes the user experience in dynamic scenarios quite poor.

Viewing angles

9.8/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
11%
77%

Samsung S95F with a QD-OLED panel currently offers some of the best viewing angles on the market. Whether we're sitting directly in front or off to the side of the couch, the picture remains consistent – colours don't lose their intensity, and contrast doesn't degrade. It's a screen that's hard to find a weak point in this category.

Sharp JP7 uses a VA panel, which automatically means narrow viewing angles. It's a classic compromise: we get quite good blacks and contrast, but at the cost of image degradation when viewed from the side. At an angle, the colours clearly fade and wash out, losing their saturation, so the JP7 is definitely a device for watching "straight on," rather than from the corner of the couch.

Daytime performance

7.1/10

7.3/10

Panel finish
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Poor
Good

Panel brightness

SHARP JP7765E: 708 cd/m2

SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED): 671 cd/m2

One of the biggest distinguishing features of the Samsung S95F compared to its competitors is the matte screen coating. This solution performs best on the market in terms of reducing reflections and glare – the image remains clear even in a brightly lit living room. However, it’s important to keep in mind that the characteristics of the QD-OLED panel come with a certain compromise. Under intense lighting, black can brighten, taking on a cherry black hue, which affects color saturation. On the other hand, the brightness of the panel, reaching around 700 nits in SDR mode, is fully sufficient for the TV to perform flawlessly in typical daylight conditions.

The satin coating applied in the Sharp JP7 quite effectively reduces reflections, although it’s still far from being fully matte. The real 'gamechanger' in bright rooms, however, is the brightness of the device itself in SDR content. With an average result of 700 nits and peaks around 1000 nits, this is an exceptional performance in the segment under 2000 PLN. Thanks to such high luminance, the television can easily handle even brightly lit living rooms. One just has to watch out for direct reflections, for instance from a window opposite, because the satin used here won’t eliminate them completely, but at this brightness, the picture will remain legible.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-RSMFDEUC-0090-104 2.5, E2500007, BT-S
UKN4.250714.091
Image processor
MT5896 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) TV Panel details
Review SHARP JP7765E TV Panel details

SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED)

SHARP JP7765E

TV features

7.9/10

6.4/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
    4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features
Review SHARP JP7765E TV features

SmartTV in S95F: Tizen

Compared to the competition, the Samsung S95F not only shines with its picture quality but also shows that smart features can be really well thought out. Tizen runs very quickly, doesn’t hang up, and gives the impression that everything is at your fingertips – from AirPlay to simple voice search, which works even when the remote goes missing. Admittedly, the system isn't open like Android, but to be honest, very few will notice any shortcomings here – there are plenty of apps, and additional features like integration with SmartThings only enhance the feeling of completeness.

Classic features of S95F

Interestingly, Samsung reminds us that a television is still a television. Therefore, alongside the modern gadgets, we also find the classics – PiP, teletext, and the option to pair headphones via Bluetooth. There’s no recording to USB from DVB-T/T2 tuners, but instead, we get a remote that can also manage the Canal+ decoder and other devices in the living room. And the cherry on top is the One Connect module – all connections in a separate box, making connecting devices no longer an extreme sport.

Smart TV Features - Google TV

The main advantage of the Sharp JP7 is the Google TV system, which currently offers the widest access to apps on the market. The library is almost limitless – from all popular streaming services to niche VOD solutions and multimedia players. The system provides significant freedom for personalisation and access to the latest versions of popular platforms. In the package, we receive a Bluetooth remote that allows for the use of the built-in voice assistant without the need to point at the television. The only notable shortcoming in the multimedia area that we encountered is the lack of support for AirPlay. Apple device users, such as iPhone or iPad owners, will not be able to wirelessly stream images directly to the screen of this Sharp.

Classic Features and Connections

Regarding traditional TV functions, the Sharp JP7 does not offer anything that goes beyond the market standard. There is no option to record programs to external storage (PVR) or a dual tuner, which excludes the use of picture-in-picture (PiP) functionality. The television provides only basic solutions such as teletext and the ability to wirelessly connect accessories via Bluetooth.

As for connections, the Sharp JP7 offers 4 HDMI ports, which the manufacturer proudly describes as standard 2.1. However, let's make this clear: this is purely a marketing move, as in practice these ports offer only full functionality of standard 2.0 due to the limitations of the television. On the plus side, it is worth noting the presence of a classic mini-jack headphone output, which allows connection of older audio systems or speakers without the need for adapters or HDMI eARC standard. This is a rather rare and very practical addition nowadays.

Apps

9.3/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9/10

9.4/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in player in the S95F does the job – movies and music start without a hitch, so it's more than enough for everyday use. The trouble starts when we expect complete compatibility with what the manufacturer claims. Not all photo formats work, and HEIC files simply refuse to cooperate. However, for most people, this won't be an issue – for basic applications, such a player performs flawlessly.

When it comes to multimedia support from external sources, the Sharp JP7 simply excels. The built-in player is a real surprise, as it handled almost every file format we supplied. It even managed to support the HEIC format (mainly used in Apple devices) without any issues, which many TVs struggle with. Here, Sharp displayed the photos without the slightest hitch. Of course, a significant advantage is the presence of the Google TV system, which allows the installation of external apps like VLC or Kodi in case of any problems. However, in our opinion, this would be an unnecessary step as the factory player is refined and versatile enough to satisfy even the most demanding users.

Sound

8/10

6/10

  • Maximum volume
    82dB
    89dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

The built-in speakers of the S95F can be surprisingly good – they sound pleasant and clear, and despite the slim design of the TV, it's hard to say the audio is flat. Sure, there could be more bass, but that’s a natural compromise with such a thin casing. For everyday watching of movies or series, the set works excellently. Those who enjoy stronger experiences should consider a soundbar – preferably one with Q-Symphony support. Then the TV speakers and the Samsung soundbar work together.

The sound coming from the JP7765E model can be described as unusual, and even – looking at our measurements – quite peculiar. The first thing that stands out is the massive scale of volume. The TV can reach levels of almost 90 decibels (89 dBC on the chart), which is a record result in this class. Such strong "loudness" is sure to appeal to seniors or those who need a device with very high audibility.

However, a glance at the frequency chart explains why the sound seems so "weird." The characteristic is extremely uneven: we have solid boosts in the lower registers (around 200 Hz) and in the high tones, but the mid-range – where most of the information about the human voice lies (between 500 Hz and 1.5 kHz) – experiences a huge drop. This makes the sound unnatural and can seem "withdrawn" at key moments of dialogues.

On the plus side, there is support for the Dolby Atmos format. However, it must be honestly admitted that to truly feel the potential of this system, connecting at least a decent soundbar will be necessary. The JP7's own speakers, despite being very loud, are unable to convey the cinematic depth and precision required by this standard.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

82dBC (Max)

75dBC

89dBC (Max)

75dBC