SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) vs Philips MLED920 / MLED910

Direct comparison

S95F / FAT / FAE

Info

MLED920 / MLED910

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”77”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Panel type: QD-OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.7

6.5

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    9.3

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    9.3

    6.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.9

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    9.9

    8.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.8

    4.0

  • Watching in bright light

    7.1

    5.5

  • Utility functions

    7.9

    5.5

  • Apps

    8.7

    6.7

  • Sound quality

    8.0

    6.2

Advantages

  • Perfect black and outstanding contrast

  • High brightness of the image

  • Amazing image quality after calibration

  • Ultra-fast QD-OLED 165 Hz panel

  • Best choice for gamers – full support for HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, and HGiG, with input lag of just 5 ms (highest rating on the portal!)

  • Best reflection suppression thanks to the matte screen finish

  • Wide viewing angles without loss of quality – top level thanks to the QD-OLED panel

  • Intuitive and fast Tizen operating system with a rich set of features

  • Modern and elegant design

  • One Connect module for easy and aesthetic cable management

  • Solid black and high contrast thanks to mini-LED backlighting

  • HDR brightness reaching 700–800 nits in real movie scenes

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Ambilight – an element that adds atmosphere, especially in the evening

  • A lot of supported audio formats: DTS:X, Dolby Atmos, Dolby True HD 7.1

  • 144 Hz panel with support for VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming

  • Loud sound (up to 88 dB)

  • Illuminated remote

Disadvantages

No like
  • No support for DTS:X (home theatre)

  • No USB recording from built-in tuners

  • Cherry black effect in very difficult lighting conditions

  • Titan OS is quite underdeveloped – there are significant errors and missing features in the applications

  • Few user-friendly features

  • Hybrid infrared remote

  • Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions in dark scenes

  • The television is not suitable (aside from gaming) for working with a PC – strong dithering and poor readability of fonts, especially coloured ones and on dark backgrounds

Our verdict

Samsung S95F is an excellent continuation and an improvement on last year's S95D model. Thanks to the QD-OLED panel, we receive a picture that captivates from the first minutes of viewing. The blacks are deep and natural, without any traces of backlighting, and the brightness of the new generation panel reaches levels that not long ago seemed beyond the reach of OLEDs. These values are high enough that the S95F can confidently be compared with the best Mini-LED screens – both in terms of HDR effect and in everyday use in strong daylight. After a slight adjustment of settings, the TV can offer reference image quality, creating a cohesive and cinematic experience. However, it is not just a screen for movie lovers, but also one of the absolute favourites for gamers. The 165 Hz panel with rapid response, input lag of just a few milliseconds, a full suite of gaming features – including VRR, ALLM and excellently implemented HGiG – along with four HDMI 2.1 ports make the S95F effortlessly meet the requirements of both next-gen console owners and PC gamers. It offers a range of capabilities that make the S95F one of the best gaming TVs on the market. Samsung has also taken care of practical details. The matte screen coating effectively eliminates reflections, ensuring that even in a bright living room, the picture remains clear and comfortable. The One Connect module organizes the cables, moving all connections to a separate box, which will be appreciated by anyone who likes to regularly juggle connected devices. The design of the TV is slim, elegant and well thought out – it is evident that this is a Super Premium class product that looks great in any interior. Of course, like any equipment, the S95F has its minor compromises, but at this level and completeness, it is easy to forget about them.

This is a TV that combines the best image quality with functionality and user comfort. Undoubtedly, it competes with the strongest rivals, and can confidently be regarded as one of the main contenders for the title of TV of the Year 2025.

Philips MLED920 is a natural continuation of last year’s PML9000 model, but it’s not a rehash. It’s clear that the manufacturer has done their homework – primarily, the local dimming algorithms have been improved, which last year could really spoil the viewing experience. Now, black levels and contrast are definitely better, and combined with Dolby Vision here, even HDR content looks quite decent. The picture can sometimes shine where it should, and it doesn’t strain the eyes in more challenging scenes. Undoubtedly, the greatest asset of the MLED920 is its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided backlighting can give films and games a whole new atmosphere – it’s as if the screen is extending beyond its boundaries, and the whole room becomes part of the viewing experience. This is something that will be appreciated not only by movie buffs but also by gamers, who, in addition to the lights, get a full set of features typical of modern gaming TVs: 144 Hz, VRR, ALLM, and Dolby Vision Gaming. In this regard, Philips has a lot to offer. But. Well, there’s a big but – this is where we reach the most difficult part of this verdict – it’s still a dual-purpose device. On one hand, we have strong picture quality and the unique Ambilight feature, on the other, there are hardware limitations that are hard to ignore. Titan OS in its current form is a big hindrance, full of bugs and shortcomings that make the TV lag behind the competition. Added to this is the price, which is by no means low for the features offered. Therefore, it’s hard to recommend it unequivocally to everyone. However, if you’re looking for Philips' brightest screen at a reasonable price, with Ambilight, a full set of features for gamers, and basic apps – the MLED920 will be quite a good choice.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Super Premium
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
Yes
No
Accessories
Stand, One Connect Box
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

7.9/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 144 (12 x 12)

Contrast:

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

298,900:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

38,500:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

23,950:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

16,850:1

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,000:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Contrast and black detail
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Contrast and black detail

The Samsung S95F with a QD-OLED panel shows that when it comes to blacks and contrast, it's hard to find anything better. Even the first test scenes prove that this television can achieve absolute black, while simultaneously delivering the tiniest points of light flawlessly. The effect is stunning – a star-filled sky looks as if it’s been directly transported from an observatory, and the film's darkness takes on depth and drama. Details in the shadows are preserved with reference-level accuracy, making home cinema viewing gain a new dimension.

Philips MLED920 in the 55-inch version that we had the opportunity to test uses a high-contrast VA panel. The panel itself is one thing, but the real standout feature of this model is the mini-LED backlighting. This largely determines how black and contrast look – and it must be said that Philips has taken a big step forward compared to the models from 2024, where the local dimming algorithms performed just average. In this new version, it is significantly better, and the contrast presented by the MLED920 can truly surprise in a positive way. At times, it even approaches the level known from the best LCD TVs on the market – blacks can be deep, the image gains a three-dimensional quality, and viewing experiences in a dark room leave a great impression. Of course, as with any mini-LED TV, this is not an image completely free of compromises. With a large number of small elements on the screen, the local dimming algorithms can sometimes get confused – at times dimming details more than we would like and other times brightening the background, resulting in slight, light blue halos around objects (the so-called halo effect). Despite these imperfections, we must emphasize that black and contrast are truly strengths of the Philips MLED920 and definitely one of the reasons to consider it in the mid-range segment.

HDR effect quality

8.7/10

5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 99.3%, Bt.2020: 87.1%
DCI P3: 89.9%, Bt.2020: 65.6%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

2044 nit

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

2159 nit

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

2167 nit

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

2180 nit

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1427 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

722 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

775 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

131 nit

Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Brightness measurement

Result

677 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Static HDR10

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) HDR effect quality
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 HDR effect quality

HDR luminance chart:

Philips MLED920 / MLED910

HDR luminance

SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED)

HDR luminance

The new generation of QD-OLED panels in Samsung's S95F showcases its full potential, and the brightness results are simply astounding. In test film scenes, such as “Life of Pi” or “Sicario 2”, where smaller light elements appear – stars, the moon, or spotlights – the television managed to achieve over 2000 nits of brightness. This is a result that surpasses even most top Mini-LED models.

The secret lies in the technology itself – instead of a limited number of dimming zones like in Mini-LED televisions, here we have millions of glowing pixels, allowing the television to fully demonstrate its power without technological compromises. Of course, since it is still an organic panel, in scenes that are full-screen and flooded with white – like in the final sequence from The Meg – brightness drops to around 1400 nits. Nevertheless, the result remains excellent and definitely exceeds what any OLEDs, both QD-OLED and WOLED, have offered so far. The colour reproduction is also particularly noteworthy. Thanks to QD-OLED technology, the television achieves almost 100% coverage of the DCI-P3 colour space and around 80% in BT.2020. These values make HDR images not only dazzling in brightness but also stunning in their range of colours.

Philips MLED920 in our measurements in static tests even reached around 900 nits, which for a mid-range model is quite an impressive result. In practice, this translates to a lot of satisfaction during viewing – in scenes rich in bright light, such as the first, third, or fifth test patterns, the screen was able to generate around 700 nits, which is sufficient to feel the real "HDR effect". However, it cannot be denied that the limited number of backlight zones and the typical mini-LED compromises in dimming algorithms reveal their flaws in more demanding scenes. In sequences with small light sources – like the moon or a scene from the film Sicario 2 – the television clearly prioritises maintaining deeper blacks at the expense of the brightness of these small elements. For most viewers, this is still a reasonable compromise, as the dark background looks much better, although it should be noted that the details themselves may not dazzle with intensity. The question of colours also leaves a bit to be desired. Although the employed PFS filter (the equivalent of quantum dots known from QLEDs) does its job and the colours appear quite vibrant, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour space reaches "only" 90%. In everyday viewing, this will be sufficient, but in extremely colourful productions – like the latest Disney animations – one can notice that some tones are not as vivid as they could be in other constructions.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

5/10

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Factory color reproduction
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Factory color reproduction
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Factory color reproduction

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best picture mode straight out of the box is undoubtedly Filmmaker Mode – a mode that Samsung has been using for several years and which is intended to faithfully convey the creators' vision. In SDR content, its implementation is not bad, although some imperfections can be noticed. The image is slightly dimmed, and the screen has a subtle pinkish hue resulting from an excess of red and blue in the white balance. Colour errors remained at a level of 3–4 ΔE units – and for the uninitiated: a value above 3 is the threshold where the average human eye starts to notice differences.

Much bigger problems arise in HDR content, however. Here, the white balance was not as much of an issue – a slight excess of blue did not significantly hinder things. The problem became brightness management. In practice, the TV "blows out" the image too much, causing details in the blacks to completely disappear. The final effect was far from what was expected, and the colour errors in this mode became quite significant. It’s hard to say why such a design decision was made, but it was clear that the factory HDR settings do not allow this TV to showcase its full potential.

Like every Philips TV we've tested, the MLED920 was primarily assessed in Filmmaker mode – the so-called "most honest" mode, designed for films and to faithfully convey the intentions of the creators. Indeed, in terms of colour accuracy, it performs best among all the modes available on the TV, but it is not without flaws. The first thing that stands out is the white balance. The image has a slight tendency towards purple-pink tones, giving it a somewhat unnatural character. However, an even bigger problem turned out to be what we mentioned earlier – image clipping. Just looking at the gamma or EOTF charts reveals that the line deviates significantly from the norm, dropping below a value of 1.8. In practice, this means "bleeding" of the brightest whites, where the image becomes almost milky. Fortunately, most of these issues can be corrected – the MLED920 responds to calibration, and with a few adjustments, image quality can be significantly improved.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.4/10

7.5/10

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Color reproduction after calibration
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Color reproduction after calibration
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Color reproduction after calibration

After calibration, it was possible to make subtle adjustments to the white balance and significantly improve the image characteristics. In SDR content, the quality has become practically reference-level – most colour errors have dropped below a ΔE value of 1, which is the level at which the human eye can no longer perceive differences. This is a result that places the S95F among the absolute top TV models available on the market.

In HDR material, calibration also brought a significant improvement. The tendency of the TV to blow out the image was managed, as confirmed by the analysis of the EOTF curve. There is still a slight tendency to brighten the entire scene or occasional loss of detail in the blacks, but this does not significantly affect the overall perception. After calibration, the S95F shows its full potential and can be regarded as one of the best TVs on the market!

After calibration, we managed to largely tame the white balance – to the extent that the average viewer will not be able to detect colour inaccuracies. The characteristic pink-purple glow that previously disrupted the naturalness of the image has also disappeared. The colour palette has been organised, and the colours appear more cohesive and neutral. The gamma in SDR content looks really good after calibration – there’s no sign of the earlier “bleeding” effect in bright scenes. The image has become more contrasty and free from the milky effect that previously severely affected the viewing experience. In the case of HDR content, the improvement is also noticeable, although here it is still evident that the television goes “its own way”. The EOTF curve cannot be fully adjusted, as Philips simply does not offer tools for precise control of this parameter in its settings. In many films, the television still exposes the image “in its own way”. Despite these limitations, calibration has brought a lot of good – the majority of colour inaccuracies have been minimised and the overall image balance has significantly improved. However, one must remember that certain barriers arise from the very hardware construction and simply cannot be overcome.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.9/10

6.5/10

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Smoothness of tonal transitions

The Samsung S95F with a QD-OLED panel handles tonal transitions really well. It's hard to find any serious issues here – the colour gradation is smooth, and the image looks natural. Only in very dark scenes and shades close to black can you notice some slight imperfections, but they don't matter much during everyday viewing. The overall impression is that the fluidity of transitions is at a very high level and doesn't distract the viewer's attention.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in the Philips MLED920 is not its strongest suit. In our tests, we quickly noticed that the television has noticeable issues in darker scenes – examples include segments from the film The Green Knight or test grey palettes. There, you can see characteristic banding of colours and too harsh transitions between shades, which can be quite noticeable in productions with a darker aesthetic. Fortunately, the situation looks better in brighter scenes – there, the image presents smoothly and without significant artifacts.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

Samsung S95F offers a noise reduction feature that smooths tonal transitions. It works very effectively, but in practice, it can be too aggressive. Materials of lower quality – e.g. older recordings or videos from YouTube – become soft and plastic when it is enabled, resembling an image digitally smoothed in graphic software. Unfortunately, the natural film grain, which often adds authenticity to the image, disappears in the process. Fortunately, the television does not lose too much fine detail, e.g. in skin textures or environmental elements. Therefore, this feature is best used judiciously – depending on preferences, one can achieve a smooth but less natural image or one that is truer to the original. In our opinion, the most universal choice is the “Standard” setting.

Image scaling performs significantly better. The television handles lower resolution materials well – even 576p content looks quite decent, though slight blockiness can be observed. Overall, the effect is very good, although it slightly trails behind what Sony Bravia 8 (II) or LG G5 can achieve. It’s also worth mentioning a small imperfection of the S95F – in older materials, overscan may occur, causing a slight trimming of the left edge of the image.

The manufacturer has equipped this model with several features that improve signal quality, and although we usually approach such “enhancers” with caution, here they prove to be really helpful. The key option is called “distortion reduction” – it works best at a medium level because, on one hand, it effectively smooths out unwanted steps and colour transitions, and on the other, it doesn’t excessively cut details, meaning the image still looks natural.

It’s a bit worse when it comes to upscaling. Lower quality materials – such as the test video with the model – appeared soft and lacking sharpness. Of course, it can be partially adjusted with the sharpness slider in the menu, but the result still falls short compared to what competitors offer at a similar price. Philips still needs to work on this aspect because, in light of the successful improvement of tonal transitions, the upscaling simply comes off weak.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

7.7/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
165Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
50%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@165Hz):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

The Samsung S95F excels in motion fluidity, presenting phenomenal performance. The panel operates at a native resolution of 4K with a refresh rate of up to 165 Hz, and when combined with QD-OLED organic technology, it delivers incredible results. Sports and games look sensational – the picture is fast, dynamic, and very natural. Additionally, the built-in motion smoother and blur reduction system allow you to customise the character of the image to your own preferences. You can opt for a more 'framey' effect with visible film texture or a smooth, cinematic spectacle. Every viewer will find a setting that suits them.

Philips MLED920 features a 144 Hz panel, which immediately suggests that we shouldn’t complain about motion smoothness. And indeed – for a VA panel, the motion blur is relatively low here, and while you can sometimes notice slight issues on darker backgrounds, they’re not something that will catch the eye of most people during regular viewing.

A big plus is also the presence of a motion smoother called “Motion Style.” It allows you to adjust the smoothness to your own preferences – if someone prefers a more “theatrical,” almost television-like character of the image, they can increase the sliders, and if they want to maintain the natural “judders” of a cinematic frame, they just need to set lower values. This way, everyone can find a happy medium.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.6/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 165Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

The same advantages of low motion blur and excellent motion fluidity characteristic of OLED panels are just the beginning, as the Samsung S95F has been designed with gamers in mind. The manufacturer has equipped it with four HDMI 2.1 ports – though limited to a bandwidth of 40 Gb/s, in practice, this has no impact on compatibility with consoles or PCs. We get a full package of gaming features: variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic game mode (ALLM), as well as a very well-implemented HGiG standard, ensuring that HDR titles look as the creators intended. This is complemented by Game Bar – a clear settings hub, where with one motion, we can preview and change all key image parameters. The proprietary motion smoother Game Motion Plus also deserves praise, as it can smooth out animation, which is especially useful in productions running at 60 frames, where stability is not always exemplary. While there is no support for Dolby Vision in games, it’s hard to consider this a serious drawback – Samsung compensates with other solutions. This is one of the best, if not the best, gaming TVs available on the market today.

For gamers, the Philips MLED920 is truly a complete tool. The manufacturer has taken care of everything that is now considered standard in televisions for consoles and PCs. It has ALLM, so the console automatically switches the screen to game mode, there’s VRR and a 144 Hz refresh rate that ensures smooth gameplay even in fast-paced titles. All key HDR formats are supported – including HGiG and Dolby Vision Gaming for Xbox – which means that regardless of what you’re playing and on which console, the television will be able to extract the maximum potential from the image. In everyday gaming, the Game Bar proves useful too – a relatively simple implementation by Philips, but a functional panel where you can quickly check image parameters, enable VRR, or adjust details without leaving the game. It’s not as elaborate as the competition, but it does its job without any complaints. And finally, something that sets Philips apart from the competition – Ambilight. The three-sided LED backlighting can make a huge impression in games, especially in the evening. It’s also a way to slightly 'expand' the screen and create a greater sense of immersion. And since coloured LEDs have recently become almost an essential element of a gamer’s room, the MLED920 fits perfectly into this trend.

Input lag

10/10

9.6/10

SDR

1080p60
10 ms
18 ms
1080p120
5 ms
9 ms
2160p60
10 ms
17 ms
2160p120
5 ms
9 ms

HDR

2160p60
9 ms
17 ms
2160p120
5 ms
9 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
35 ms
2160p120 DV
9 ms

The input lag on the S95F is at a level where it’s hard to even talk about lag. 5 ms at 120 Hz content means there’s no space for hesitation between pressing a button and the response on the screen. It’s pure immediacy. And if someone’s worried about the 60 Hz mode – don’t stress, there we’re talking about 10 ms, which is still a figure that places the TV in the absolute top tier and gives no reason for complaints.

The input lag on the Philips MLED920 is really very good – in 120 Hz mode, we measured values below 10 ms, which places this model among the absolute top of LCD TVs in terms of responsiveness. Even at 60 Hz, a result of around 18 ms is fully acceptable and won't interfere with any type of gameplay. One exception is the Dolby Vision mode at 60 frames, where the latency can increase to as much as 35 ms. This is a result that may be a bit glaring for esports players, but it must be stated honestly – for most so-called "casual gamers," it will be absolutely imperceptible. Especially since we're talking about values that still allow for comfortable gaming without major compromises.

Compatibility with PC

8.8/10

4/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
5ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RGB
BGR
Max refresh rate
165Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Compatibility with PC
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Compatibility with PC

S95F with a QD-OLED panel is a true magnet for PC gamers. The 165 Hz refresh rate combined with virtually negligible input lag and full support for G-Sync and FreeSync means the TV functions like a top-tier monitor. Dynamic action games, shooters, and racing games gain fluidity and responsiveness that are hard to find in competing models. When working with text, you may notice a subtle rainbow halo around letters, characteristic of the sub-pixel layout of QD-OLED, but thanks to proper handling of chroma 4:4:4, everything remains readable and does not interfere with everyday use.

When it comes to working with a PC, the Philips MLED920 evokes quite mixed feelings. On one hand, it looks impressive on paper – we have 144 Hz, support for G-Sync and FreeSync, so in terms of gaming on PC, the TV does not disappoint. Anyone looking for a large screen for computer games gets a solid package of features here. However, when we try to use it as a typical monitor for everyday work, its limitations quickly become apparent. The fonts do not look the best – there is noticeable strong dithering, coloured letters can be jagged, and with very dark text, there are even strange anomalies, as if the panel is losing thin lines and having trouble reproducing them correctly. In short: For PC gaming, yes. For any work and reading text: a definite no.

Viewing angles

9.8/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
11%
68%

Samsung S95F with a QD-OLED panel currently offers some of the best viewing angles on the market. Whether we're sitting directly in front or off to the side of the couch, the picture remains consistent – colours don't lose their intensity, and contrast doesn't degrade. It's a screen that's hard to find a weak point in this category.

The viewing angles on the MLED920 are classic for VA type panels – even a slight tilt from the centre causes the image to start losing colours, contrast weakens, and the overall picture becomes quite flat and less appealing. There are no miracles here. So if you’re watching films with a larger group and everyone is sitting a bit to the side, this will be slightly noticeable. On the other hand, you get what you pay for: thanks to this panel, the MLED920 can display a much deeper black than TVs with IPS panels.

Daytime performance

7.1/10

5.5/10

Panel finish
Matte
Satin
Reflection suppression
Very Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Poor
Good
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Daytime performance
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Daytime performance
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) Daytime performance
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 Daytime performance

Panel brightness

Average luminance SDR

Philips MLED920 / MLED910: 421 cd/m2

SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED): 671 cd/m2

One of the biggest distinguishing features of the Samsung S95F compared to its competitors is the matte screen coating. This solution performs best on the market in terms of reducing reflections and glare – the image remains clear even in a brightly lit living room. However, it’s important to keep in mind that the characteristics of the QD-OLED panel come with a certain compromise. Under intense lighting, black can brighten, taking on a cherry black hue, which affects color saturation. On the other hand, the brightness of the panel, reaching around 700 nits in SDR mode, is fully sufficient for the TV to perform flawlessly in typical daylight conditions.

Philips MLED920 performs quite well in everyday use. The satin finish on the panel effectively reduces reflections, and in most moderately sunny living rooms, it manages unwanted glare quite well. However, it's important to remember that this is not a TV that dazzles with brightness – the average value in SDR hovers around 450 nits. In very bright rooms, particularly with large south-facing windows, the screen doesn't always stand up to the intense daylight. In such situations, it's worth supporting it with even light curtains, so viewing comfort doesn't suffer too much.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-RSMFDEUC-0090-104 2.5, E2500007, BT-S
TPN258E_V058.002.179.041
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) TV Panel details
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV Panel details

SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED)

Philips MLED920 / MLED910

TV features

7.9/10

5.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    Yes
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review SAMSUNG OLED S95F (QD-OLED) TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features
Review Philips MLED920 / MLED910 TV features

SmartTV in S95F: Tizen

Compared to the competition, the Samsung S95F not only shines with its picture quality but also shows that smart features can be really well thought out. Tizen runs very quickly, doesn’t hang up, and gives the impression that everything is at your fingertips – from AirPlay to simple voice search, which works even when the remote goes missing. Admittedly, the system isn't open like Android, but to be honest, very few will notice any shortcomings here – there are plenty of apps, and additional features like integration with SmartThings only enhance the feeling of completeness.

Classic features of S95F

Interestingly, Samsung reminds us that a television is still a television. Therefore, alongside the modern gadgets, we also find the classics – PiP, teletext, and the option to pair headphones via Bluetooth. There’s no recording to USB from DVB-T/T2 tuners, but instead, we get a remote that can also manage the Canal+ decoder and other devices in the living room. And the cherry on top is the One Connect module – all connections in a separate box, making connecting devices no longer an extreme sport.

Smart TV – Titan OS

Philips MLED920 uses the proprietary Titan OS, which is just starting its adventure in the TV market and unfortunately, this is evident at every turn. On one hand, we have basic features – such as AirPlay support or the ability to mirror content from a smartphone, but on the other hand, its limitations quickly become apparent. Screen mirroring works only with a phone, but not with a laptop. Voice search? Yes, but it only works with Amazon Alexa and in languages supported by this assistant. The system operates fairly quickly, but every now and then it can "fail" and gives the impression of something that is underdeveloped and still evolving.

Classic TV Functions

Titan OS also doesn't excel in terms of classic TV functions. Aside from the hybrid remote with a numeric keypad – which is indeed backlit and thoughtfully designed in two modes, it unfortunately operates on infrared – there’s nothing here that would truly set the MLED920 apart from the competition. There’s a lack of USB recording or a PiP function, and such solutions could be useful in this class. From unusual additions, we have an analog output in the form of a jack, which allows for connecting headphones or older speakers. It’s a small nod to users who still use older equipment.

Ambilight TV

What definitely draws attention away from the shortcomings of Titan OS is the unique, three-sided Ambilight system. Here, Philips still plays in its own league and can impress those who haven't experienced this feature before. The colour backlighting that reacts to the content on the screen adds a unique atmosphere to viewing sessions and is something that the competition does not offer in a similar form. It is precisely Ambilight that is meant to ensure that other shortcomings – both system-related and functional – take a back seat.

Playing files from USB

9/10

8.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in player in the S95F does the job – movies and music start without a hitch, so it's more than enough for everyday use. The trouble starts when we expect complete compatibility with what the manufacturer claims. Not all photo formats work, and HEIC files simply refuse to cooperate. However, for most people, this won't be an issue – for basic applications, such a player performs flawlessly.

The built-in player in the Philips MLED920 works quite well and handles most popular audio and video files without any major issues – just as you can see in our test table. So there’s no worry about typical movie or music formats. The only complaint we can have is regarding its rather selective support for photo formats and some resolutions.

Apps

8.7/10

6.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

8/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    82dB
    88dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

The built-in speakers of the S95F can be surprisingly good – they sound pleasant and clear, and despite the slim design of the TV, it's hard to say the audio is flat. Sure, there could be more bass, but that’s a natural compromise with such a thin casing. For everyday watching of movies or series, the set works excellently. Those who enjoy stronger experiences should consider a soundbar – preferably one with Q-Symphony support. Then the TV speakers and the Samsung soundbar work together.

The sound in the Philips MLED920 is probably not the element that will impress you the most. It sounds fairly flat, lacking depth and clearer bass, which means movies or concerts don't have that extra layer of immersion that a better audio system can provide. However, it must be said that the volume is at a really decent level – the TV can ramp up to even 88 decibels. A big plus of the MLED920 is not so much the sound quality itself, but the support for audio formats. Philips has ensured compatibility with virtually all the major standards, including Dolby Atmos, DTS, and Dolby TrueHD 7.1. This means that if someone decides to connect an external soundbar or amplifier, they won't encounter any limitations and will be able to enjoy the full cinema sound.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

82dBC (Max)

75dBC

88dBC (Max)

75dBC