Samsung DU7192 (IPS) vs XIAOMI A PRO 2025

Direct compare

DU7192 / DU7172

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”

Available screen sizes: 43”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.2

5.6

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.6

    5.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    4.2

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.8

    5.1

  • Gaming on console

    6.4

    6.2

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    1.0

  • Watching in bright light

    2.8

    3.8

  • Utility functions

    7.2

    6.5

  • Apps

    9.3

    10.0

  • Sound quality

    5.4

    6.0

Advantages

  • Excellent cooperation with the computer - low input lag, chroma 4:4:4

  • Faithful colour reproduction after calibration

  • Minimal colour degradation at an angle

  • Smooth operation of the Tizen system

  • Expanded Google TV operating system

  • Voice control in Polish

  • Good image processing

  • High native contrast

  • Attractive price

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness of HDR materials

  • No tone transition smoothing feature

  • Average image scaling

  • Low brightness

  • Poor font readability

  • The system can freeze

Our verdict

Samsung DU7192 is a very budget-friendly solution that is primarily suited for typical Sunday viewing. The television performs best during daytime viewing, as ambient light effectively masks its less-than-ideal black levels. Thanks to the IPS panel, colours will maintain their hues and saturation even from an angle. The brightness of the Samsung DU7192 also suggests the usage it will excel in, namely television or YouTube, as HDR content on streaming platforms will be too dark. The biggest advantage of the television is the colour reproduction after calibration, as they are of good quality and allow for viewing content that is quite similar to what the film director intended. Praise for the image quality is also warranted for the quality of tonal transitions, which definitely stands out as a hallmark of this television, placing it well above its competitors. Regarding smaller features that can be considered good in the Samsung DU7192, compatibility with computers and the operating system are noteworthy. The former performs exceptionally well, and thanks to the correctly implemented chroma 4:4:4, the tested television can successfully serve as a monitor, as the readability of text will be at a high level. The system operates very smoothly and efficiently. During the tests conducted, there was no situation where it froze. Additionally, the default media player is excellent and handled practically every file we prepared for it. So, who is the Samsung DU7192 for? Primarily for less demanding individuals, for whom the television serves merely as a small escape in their daily routine. The DU7192 Samsung features a modern and elegant design that will fit into most interiors. The matte frame finish adds style to the device and makes it not only a functional but also an aesthetically pleasing element of living room decor. It’s worth noting that the Samsung DU7192 has an exceptionally thin profile, making it easy to mount on the wall, thereby saving space in the room. This is an ideal solution for those who wish to enjoy minimalism in their interiors without compromising on high-quality equipment.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is an affordable QLED model that works well as a basic television at home. The Google TV operating system deserves special mention. Thanks to it, you can easily use apps like Netflix or YouTube. The interface is clear and easy to navigate, and the voice search capability in Polish ensures that we can quickly find the content we are interested in. The picture quality of the A Pro 2025 is sufficient for everyday TV watching or movies. Smooth tonal transitions and the enhancement of older materials make even lower resolution content look good. However, the screen brightness may disappoint in very sunny rooms – here, the TV performs moderately, but it fares much better in a darkened room. The television is more suited to occasional gaming. The low input lag provides quick response times, which is important for dynamic games. However, the 60 Hz panel and lack of more advanced features may not appeal to gamers looking for perfect image fluidity. On the other hand, A Pro 2025 may be sufficient for those who play from time to time. Not everything works perfectly. When connecting the TV to a computer, the fonts are hard to read, which can be an issue when working with text. The Google TV system itself can be a bit slow, which sometimes makes it difficult to switch between apps quickly. Xiaomi A Pro 2025 is a simple and functional TV that is good for everyday TV watching and using apps. It has its drawbacks, such as average brightness and issues with font readability, but at this price, it offers a lot. It’s a good choice for those looking for budget equipment for basic uses.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps

Where to buy

No links

No links

Contrast and black detail

1.6/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Samsung DU7192 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review Samsung DU7192 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

950:1

Review Samsung DU7192 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review Samsung DU7192 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review Samsung DU7192 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,300:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,200:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,100:1

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Samsung DU7192 uses an IPS panel, which, as can be seen, does not boast the highest contrast and black levels. Measurements indicated that the tested television can only provide maximum values of 950:1, which is a very low result and unlikely to promise high efficiency in the context of home cinema. However, it is worth noting that we are testing the 43" version, so a different size may have a different type of panel. Regarding the panel used in Samsung DU7192, it belongs to the lower-end categories of IPS screens, as these can deliver much higher results. However, it should also be remembered that we are dealing with a very budget-friendly unit, which will primarily find its use in a secondary room, or will serve as a cheap receiver for a senior, for whom the quality of the displayed image is often irrelevant. In the first image from the film "Oblivion," we primarily see navy black, but also very good separation of lights coming from the spotlight. For better visibility, we recommend taking a closer look at the image in zoom. And just as there was no significant reason to deny the TV's performance in the first scene, in the second scene from "Sicario 2," it can be said that this does not require further comment. Due to the practically zero contrast, the scene lacks any depth. There are also very noticeable bright spots in the corners of the panel, which are typical of budget units. On the positive side, the detail sharpness is quite good, however, that is searching for any positivity against the backdrop of disappointing results.

Xiaomi A Pro is equipped with a VA panel, which inherently offers distinctly better black depth and colour intensity compared to IPS panels, especially in darker conditions. Based on the tests conducted, the contrast measurement tool indicated a maximum value of around 6000:1. This is a solid result, ensuring good separation of image elements in darker scenes. An example is the film Oblivion, where the TV excelled at separating bright and dark areas, enhancing the visual effects. Unfortunately, the TV does not support local dimming technology, which is an obvious fact in this price range. This particularly stands out in tougher scenes, such as those from the film Sicario 2. In such moments, the black loses intensity and starts to resemble a navy blue shade. The lack of dynamic dimming of image segments means that details that should be deeply dimmed remain slightly illuminated.

HDR effect quality

3.3/10

3.2/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 82.2%, Bt.2020: 61.2%
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 70.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Samsung DU7192 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

200 nit

Review Samsung DU7192 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review Samsung DU7192 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

246 nit

Review Samsung DU7192 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

233 nit

Review Samsung DU7192 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

245 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

205 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

220 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

243 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

213 nit

Review XIAOMI A PRO 2025 Brightness measurement

Result

237 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

HDR luminance chart:

XIAOMI A PRO 2025

Samsung DU7192 (IPS)

The maximum luminance in HDR materials is 245 nits, which is often surpassed by even lower results. Such values will definitely not be sufficient for comfortable viewing of HDR materials, due to the lack of appropriate image dynamics and colour distortions caused by the low brightness of the unit. Although the manufacturer has equipped its device with an HDR format offering dynamic metadata, HDR10+, which is what we're talking about, is very rarely used compared to Dolby Vision, which Samsung has not yet introduced in its televisions. It’s also worth mentioning that Samsung DU7192 offers only 82% coverage of the wide DCI-P3 colour gamut, which is another reason we shouldn't provide a signal in a wide dynamic range, as colour losses will be very noticeable. Samsung DU7192 delivers high-quality image that will satisfy most users.

In the HDR category, the television Xiaomi A Pro performs, to be blunt – poorly. In ideal conditions, it offers brightness at around 250 nits. This is a weak result; however, in this price range, many competing models offer similar or lower values. Such brightness is too low to fully capture the potential of HDR content. In practice, this means that the image lacks the proper depth and intensity expected from high-quality HDR. These values are more characteristic of Standard Dynamic Range (SDR), which means the true HDR effect remains out of reach for this model, and scenes that should stand out with spectacular brightness and contrast seem flat and lacking in vibrancy. However, for its price, the television offers good coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette at 92%, thanks to quantum dot technology (specifically PFS LED). This results in vibrant and saturated colours, which will appeal particularly to gamers and movie enthusiasts who appreciate richer hues and better colour reproduction compared to traditional televisions without this technology.

Factory color reproduction

4/10

5.1/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode we used throughout the testing process was "Filmmaker". This, like the vast majority of modes, had its flaws. Starting with the most basic graph, which is white balance, we can notice a significant dominance of red colour, both in SDR mode and HDR. Although in the latter there was also some green, which didn’t have a major impact on the overall perception. A graph with such results, in both cases, gives us an image characterised by strong yellowing, clearly visible on whites and on the faces of the actors. Another important graph, if not more important, is gamma. This, which is supposed to control contrast in materials with a standard colour palette, was quite good in factory mode with one "but" regarding the beginning. In the darkest scenes, it was significantly lowered, resulting in strong brightening, which left the film lacking contrast and suspense overall. As we mentioned, HDR materials regarding white balance remained at a similar level. The main change is the EOTF curve graph. At the very beginning, we can observe a bulge, which, just like in the case of gamma, strongly brightened the darkest scenes. However, after that, the graph significantly changed its characteristics and the measured result dived below the reference line, causing the film to lose even more dynamism.

The Xiaomi A Pro 2025 TV has been tested in movie mode, which offers the best colour reproduction straight out of the box. However, it’s worth noting that it is not without flaws. Analysing the white balance, one can see that the green values are in the negative. This phenomenon leads to some distortions in the shades of white, and at full white, the graph shows clear deviations. The high-contrast image results in inadequate tonal transitions in red, which negatively affects the quality of colour display. Generally, in the image below, it can be seen that the entire scenery before calibration takes on pink hues. Additionally, when analysing the gamma contrast, the graph is significantly below the value of 2.4, suggesting that the TV overly emphasises dark tones, while the brighter areas of the image may appear less pronounced. Furthermore, the EOTF curve shows a strong spike at the start, which can lead to a loss of detail in bright scenes and an unpleasant feeling of over-exaggeration. These aspects indicate the need for further calibration to achieve a more balanced colour reproduction and improve overall picture quality. Users who expect precise colour reproduction may need to take action to adjust the TV settings to achieve more realistic and natural visual results. In xiaomi tv a pro 2025, the factory colour settings in Xiaomi are average and may require calibration. After appropriate colour adjustment, the image gains a natural and vibrant colour palette, significantly closer to cinematic standards. It’s worth adding that the issue of inaccurate colour reproduction is typical for many TVs of this class, meaning it’s not a fault unique to the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 TV. For those who value perfect colour reproduction, professional calibration will be a key element that enhances overall picture quality.

Color reproduction after calibration

5.9/10

7/10

Samsung has equipped even its lowest-end TVs with advanced tools for carrying out the calibration process. So we got to work, and the results of our efforts are more than satisfactory. The white balance, which previously had a strong yellow tint in both scenarios, now looks much, much better, even if there are slight deviations from the norm. The picture will still look significantly cleaner than it did before the calibration process. We managed to model the gamma in SDR materials very well, allowing the image to be as contrasty as the TV permits. The EOTF curve has also changed its face and doesn’t brighten or darken the image in such a drastic manner. However, it is worth mentioning that in the case of HDR materials, the deltaE errors are still very high, but this is due to the unit's insufficient brightness.

Now it’s time to check how the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 TV performed after calibration. The biggest beneficiary of this process is white balance. After calibration, all previous errors were corrected in both HD and 4K content, and most errors no longer fell significantly outside the value of "2". This means a much more balanced and natural colour reproduction, which certainly affects the viewing comfort. In terms of gamma, the drop has been greatly mitigated, resulting in a more consistent tone reproduction across various scenes. However, the EOTF curve has not improved significantly due to a lack of effective control over dynamic tone mapping. This limitation means that there are still some issues with detail reproduction in bright scenes, which can affect the perception of certain materials. Nevertheless, despite these minor shortcomings, the overall shape of the picture is definitely better after calibration. The TV has gained quality, and the improved white balance along with reduced gamma issues means that users can enjoy a more realistic and pleasant visual experience. Further adjustments to the settings could improve the picture quality even more, but already the TV is demonstrating its capabilities, meeting the expectations of many users.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.7/10

9.3/10

The place where we must praise the TV Samsung DU7192 is our procedure for checking the smoothness of tonal transitions. The tested TV handled them very smoothly, and in practice, there is nothing that could cause us any inconvenience. The only place where something can be noticed is in the last scene and slight posterisation in the reds on the left side. At this point, we must mention one more issue, which is no longer related to this testing procedure. Namely, on the vast majority of scenes, there are noticeable strong inconsistencies in the backlighting, which will be much more bothersome when watching in the evening.

During the fluidity tests of tonal transitions in Xiaomi A Pro 2025, the gradation proved to be close to ideal. In most of the test sequences, there were no noticeable issues. Only in the scene with red water did very cosmetic imperfections appear, which, however, have no significant impact on the overall image quality. Both colour and grey gradients were reproduced with almost perfect precision, making this TV model a very good choice for those who pay attention to this particular feature of a television.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

3.2/10

6.9/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
No
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Let's return for a moment to the tonal transition smoothing function. We can set it in only two ways - off and auto. As you can easily guess, the first of these causes significant issues with gradation. However, if we set the second option, both movies and series will offer us smooth colour transitions. It is worth mentioning, though, that this function has its drawbacks. It heavily interferes with the director's intent, softens the film grain effect, and worse, often misinterprets small details, blurring them as well. Consequently, we consider that this function does not exist and do not recommend using it, as this is how the smoothness of tonal transitions was tested on the tested display.

The next thing we will check in this paragraph is the image scaling process, which is extremely important when watching material in lower resolution. Unfortunately, as this is the manufacturer's lowest model, this function doesn't work very well. All details are heavily blurred, and a characteristic white halo forms around the characters.

How does the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 handle tonal transitions, especially with lower quality materials? Thanks to advanced digital processing, the colour contour removal feature works surprisingly well. We recommend setting this option to "Medium" – this way, the television significantly improves the smoothness of tonal transitions while avoiding excessive smoothing of other image elements, such as film grain.

In the case of the test shot with the model and numerous branches in the background, the Xiaomi A Pro 2025 showcased its capabilities in the context of digital processing. Adding artificial sharpness to this scene made the details of the model clearer, and her hair appeared more detailed. However, delicate contours appeared around the branches in the background, which were a result of digital intervention. While this enhances the overall impression of details, excessive sharpness can make some elements of the image seem unnaturally emphasised.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.9/10

4.3/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 120Hz (double contours)
Nie
BFI function 120Hz
Nie
Nie
Brightness drop with BFI
47%
0%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Despite the fact that Samsung DU7192 is the lowest model in the manufacturer's portfolio, it has implemented a motion smoothing system. Although it is quite limited in features compared to higher models, its very existence is a significant plus in the context of competition in a similar price range. The maximum refresh rate that we will give to the tested television is 60 Hz, which is entirely sufficient for films and series, although not when it comes to sports. In the motion smoothing menu, we find two functions responsible for improving smoothness. These are "Motion Blur Reduction" and "Clear Motion (LED)". We'll discuss the latter a bit later. Let's focus on the former, as it is quite mysterious. Unfortunately, despite its presence, we did not find any usefulness. At each of the settings, the picture looked the same, characterised by the typical judder known from materials recorded at 24 fps.

The panel Samsung DU7192 features an average response time. It's worth mentioning that due to this specific type of panel, it is better than VA panels in a similar price range. Therefore, it can be said that it won't be the worst in terms of watching sports.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 offers a motion smoothing feature called "Motion Smoothing," which primarily works for films. It can be customised to favour either a more cinematic, film-like effect with visible frames or a smoother, theatrical image. This feature should satisfy those who intend to watch mainly films on it. However, gamers and sports fans may feel disappointed. The panel with a refresh rate of 60 Hz, typical for this price range, does not impress. Our "Ufo" test revealed some blurring. Those expecting better clarity for moving objects may be slightly let down.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.2/10

3.3/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    No
    No
  • VRR range
    No
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    No
    Yes

The Samsung DU7192 television is equipped only with HDMI 2.0 ports, which isn’t surprising considering the device’s price and its consumer profile. Therefore, it’s also logical that we won’t achieve maximum quality on the latest generation consoles. That’s why it only features the most basic options for gamers, namely ALLM. It’s a pity the manufacturer didn’t implement at least a GameBar, as this is now standard, even in lower-end TVs, and could offer significant conveniences in terms of quickly changing settings.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 offers several features useful for gamers, including Game Bar, which differs from the typical “dashboards” with interfaces found in other manufacturers. With this, users can quickly access game-related settings, which is convenient during intense gaming sessions. The TV also supports automatic low-latency mode (ALLM), meaning it automatically switches to a mode optimised for gaming, reducing signal delay. Unfortunately, it lacks support for HDMI 2.1, limiting the connection capabilities for the latest gaming consoles that may require higher bandwidth. Additionally, the TV does not support features such as VRR (variable refresh rate) or G-Sync, which are increasingly desired by gamers as they allow for smoother images and eliminate tearing. For these reasons, although Xiaomi A Pro 2025 has some features for gamers, in this price range, better options can be found that offer more advanced gaming solutions.

Input lag

10/10

9.8/10

SDR

1080p60
11 ms
15 ms
1080p120
2160p60
11 ms
15 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
14 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The results of the input lag measurements in DU7192 are at a high level, regardless of the signal or resolution. All gamers will surely appreciate the manufacturer's efforts, thanks to which a game running at 4K 60 Hz with HDR will have only 11 ms of lag, which is practically unnoticeable even in online games.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 delivers outstanding performance, regardless of resolution or HDR mode. With measurements as low as 15 ms, this TV ranks among the best in terms of responsiveness.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

1/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
11ms
105ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

After connecting the television to the computer and wanting to use it as a monitor, we can expect a low input lag of 11 ms, which is practically imperceptible on the mouse-screen-eye line. Thanks to the proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4, the readability of fonts is at a high level, so you can confidently connect the DU7192 to a computer as a monitor and expect comfortable work with text. It's also worth mentioning that such good cooperation with the computer is also due to the IPS panel itself, which allows for very sharp fonts due to its construction. The subpixel layout is BGR, which does not negatively affect the use of the television as a monitor. However, since operating systems are not adapted to such a subpixel format, this may cause slightly less sharp outlines. This is practically negligible, and only a handful of people might notice it. As for gaming, the lack of G-Sync and a frequency of 60 Hz are limitations that may disappoint computer game enthusiasts, especially those requiring quick reactions. For this reason, the television receives a lower rating in this category, although it performs decently as a monitor for everyday work.

In the category of collaboration with PCs, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 performs very poorly. The fonts are of low quality, and their display on the screen is often problematic. Dithering is ubiquitous; when zooming in on the fonts against a dark background, they are displayed in three colours, which is definitely eye-catching and can significantly hinder comfortable use of the device. Such issues can be a significant drawback for users planning to use the television as a computer monitor.

Viewing angles

6.8/10

2.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
64%
81%

IPS panels, unlike VA panels, are known for having very good viewing angles. This is also true for Samsung DU7192, as even with a slight change in angle, the colours maintain a very good hue and saturation. However, it is worth noting the drop in contrast, which is typical for LCD panels.

In the viewing angles category, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 with its VA panel simply performs poorly. While directly in front you can enjoy better blacks, the image loses quality from side perspectives. Our specialists found during the testing of the television that sitting a metre away from the device, the image on the right side is brightened and desaturated. However, moving a bit to the side improves everything, highlighting how significant the difference in image reception is depending on the viewing angle. All this makes the viewing experience in a larger group potentially less satisfying.

TV efficiency during daytime

2.8/10

3.8/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Słabe
Average
Black levels during daytime
Average
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

XIAOMI A PRO 2025: 249 cd/m2

Samsung DU7192 (IPS): 227 cd/m2

The Samsung DU7192 panel has a satin finish; unfortunately, this did not help the tested television in reducing reflections directly hitting the panel. The situation is not improved by the fact that the maximum brightness of the panel in SDR materials is 227 nits. One could say that the tested television is rather not suited for daytime use.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 presents itself as average. The panel coating is satin, which may help reduce reflections, but the suppression of glare is moderate. The brightness of the television is only 250 nits, which is relatively low compared to other models on the market. As a result, during sunny days or in brightly lit rooms, the image quality may suffer, and details may be hard to discern.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
White LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
T-KSU2EDDEUC-1043.3
RTM5.220609.003.1850
Image processor
-
M7632 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity:

Samsung DU7192 (IPS)

XIAOMI A PRO 2025

TV features

7.2/10

6.5/10

  • System
    Tizen
    Google TV
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • AirPlay
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    Yes
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    RF
    RF
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes

The operation of Samsung DU7192 is managed by the proprietary Tizen system. This software is quite well-known as the manufacturer has been developing it in their televisions for a really long time. Its main advantage is smooth operation and the lack of significant stutters, which we can confirm through conducted tests. The biggest downside, however, is its closed nature. Although the app store is quite extensive, we are still at the mercy of the manufacturer. Therefore, we will not be able to install missing items, even from a USB drive. On the other hand, a benefit, especially for Apple device users, is the implementation of AirPlay functionality, allowing for easy screen mirroring from a device to the television. Fortunately, Samsung has also provided the option to connect a keyboard and mouse for much quicker navigation through the television's menu. It’s worth mentioning that the manufacturer has fortunately included a Bluetooth remote this year, which was often not the case in the past. The Tizen system has one more advantage. It integrates very well with external devices, such as the NC+ decoder and soundbars. The connection process is very quick and does not require special skills.

The Tizen system is very efficient software, which is certainly a strong advantage of the television. Although more advanced users may complain about the lack of KODI, the rest will be satisfied.

In the functionality category, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 stands out with the Google TV system, which is one of its biggest advantages. This allows users access to a wide range of apps and streaming services, significantly enhancing the convenience of using the television. The Google TV system also offers a voice assistant that facilitates navigation and allows for quick content searches without the need to dig through menus. One of the key strengths of this system is the ability to download virtually unlimited apps from the Google Play Store, enabling personalisation of the television according to individual needs. Users can install apps for streaming, gaming, and various tools, making the television a multimedia entertainment hub. However, it is worth noting that this model lacks recording functions and AirPlay, which may be disappointing for some users. Additionally, there are quite significant lags in the operating system, affecting the ease of use. On the positive side, it also features the ability to pair other peripheral devices via Bluetooth and a remote that does not require aiming at the screen, which significantly improves user comfort. Despite some shortcomings, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 has the potential to meet the needs of users looking for a modern television.

Playing files from USB

9.1/10

6.8/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
No
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in player Samsung DU7192 is a significant advantage. It handled almost all video and audio files prepared for the testing process exceptionally well. The only exceptions in this regard are, of course, the Dolby Vision format (which is not surprising) and less popular codecs. It also deserves a plus for supporting Polish characters and the ability to change font colours. However, it struggles more with image formats, as it only supports the popular JPEG. There's definitely a lack of formats like PNG or Apple's HEIC.

Xiaomi A Pro 2025 offers a decent built-in media player that meets the basic expectations of users. However, the TV has its drawbacks and sometimes encounters issues with playing certain file formats, which can be frustrating. Fortunately, with access to Google Play Store, users can easily download alternative players that better meet their needs. In our test of the Xiaomi TV A Pro 2025, we demonstrated that its compatibility with applications is high, and additional media playback applications work flawlessly. It is also worth highlighting that the Xiaomi TV A Pro 2025 is equipped with the Android TV platform, enabling access to a wide range of applications and streaming services. Installing alternative media players enhances the overall functionality of the device and eliminates format compatibility issues. As a result, Xiaomi A Pro becomes a more versatile television that can meet the diverse expectations of users, even those with higher demands regarding media playback.

Apps

9.3/10

10/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
OK
Kodi

Sound

5.4/10

6/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    5.4/10
    6/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    No
    Yes

When assessing the sound from the DU7192, it should be noted that its speakers are not the best. Unfortunately, this carries consequences in the form of very poor sound quality. We recommend using half of the volume scale due to potential distortion. Fortunately, the television offers a wide range of audio codecs, including the two most important ones: DTS-HD Master Audio and Dolby Digital Plus, which allow for the transmission of surround sound to an external device. This ensures high sound quality that will satisfy users seeking better audio experiences.

When it comes to sound, Xiaomi A Pro 2025 pleasantly surprises, especially considering its price. The sound quality is really solid, and the audio does not deviate from what one might expect in this class. Additionally, the TV supports DTS audio formats, which are often missing in much more expensive TVs. It's worth noting that this rating is subjective and may vary depending on individual preferences.