Philips PUS8500 vs Samsung U8000F (VA)

Direct compare

PUS8500 / PUS8560 / PUS8510 / PUS8600

Info

U8000F / U8092F

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.6

5.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.6

    5.7

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.2

    5.9

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.2

    5.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.7

    6.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.6

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.9

    3.8

  • Utility functions

    4.7

    5.5

  • Apps

    4.6

    8.7

  • Sound quality

    6.2

    5.7

Advantages

  • Ambilight System

  • High native contrast - VA panel

  • Low input lag

  • Essential features for gamers: ALLM and VRR

  • Full support for audio formats: Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Backlit remote with numerical keypad

  • Great blacks and contrast (VA panel version)

  • Advanced Smart system: Tizen

  • Excellent for text work - displays fonts beautifully

  • Basic features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Low input lag

Disadvantages

No like
  • Average panel brightness

  • The TitanOS system feels unfinished (some features don't work, gaps in applications)

  • Infrared remote control

  • Font readability issues (PC)

  • Low brightness

  • Worse viewing angles than the version with an IPS panel (Obvious, isn't it? 😉)

  • Infrared remote

  • Inferior appearance compared to its predecessor

Our verdict

Ambilight because that's exactly where we need to start, it's the biggest reason to buy the PUS8500. The three-sided backlighting on the TV looks fantastic, especially in the evening. It creates atmosphere, masks contrast imperfections, and makes viewing simply more enjoyable. Even if the black isn’t perfect here, at high contrast the native VA panel is just good. On top of that, there’s really decent input lag and several gaming features like ALLM and VRR. Although there’s no HDMI 2.1 or 120Hz panel, casual gaming should be a pleasure. Especially since it plays responsively and without delays. Let’s add full support for audio formats – it includes both Dolby Atmos and DTS, so soundbar owners also have something to be happy about.

But let’s not kid ourselves – this is still a budget TV, and at times that’s quite obvious. Brightness is average – not so weak that you can't watch anything, but if you hit an exceptionally sunny day, watching under such conditions without blinds can be problematic. However, in our opinion, the biggest disappointment with the PUS8560 is the Titan OS operating system. Despite the fact that the system debuted some time ago, some things just didn’t work – for example, screen mirroring from a phone despite the manufacturer stating that this feature is present. There are fewer apps than the competition, and the system itself feels a bit clunky. Generally, it seems to do something already, but it clearly lacks refinement.

Of course, this isn’t a TV meant to compete with top models. But if someone is looking for something simple, with the cool atmosphere that the Ambilight system provides, it’s quite a fair proposition. You just need to know what to expect and accept the compromises, of which there are plenty here.

Samsung U8000F with a VA panel is a television that can pleasantly surprise in its class – of course, if we know what to expect from it. The greatest strength of this variant is definitely the quality of blacks. Compared to the version with an IPS panel, the difference is huge – the image gains depth, contrast looks significantly better, and evening movie sessions no longer resemble watching content through a grey filter. For a device from the budget segment, this is really a nice surprise. Additionally, we have the proven Tizen system, which not only runs smoothly but also offers access to a full range of applications, support for SmartThings, and voice assistant (via an app). The PC mode and console connection work flawlessly – fonts are clear and readable. Plus, there are basic features for gamers, such as VRR and ALLM, which – although they won’t turn this television into an esports machine – are perfectly adequate for occasional gaming.

Of course, like any construction in this budget, the U8000F with a VA panel also has its limitations. Viewing angles are not its strong suit – watching the image from the side reveals a drop in quality. However, it’s hard to regard this as a serious drawback – because you gain some advantages elsewhere. Better blacks always come with a bit less flexibility in setting. When it comes to HDR, we have a rather symbolic approach – the brightness is too low to talk about a true “wow” effect, and the color palette is limited. But let's face it – that’s not the reason you buy such a television. So if you’re planning to purchase the U8000F, we definitely recommend opting for the variant with the VA panel. It’s still a very basic model, but in this version, it offers more than you might expect – especially in terms of black quality. And in this price range, that’s quite a lot.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Average
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Stand type
stand-type-Graphite
stand-type-Black
Stand
stand-Base Adjustment
stand-Fixed
Accessories
accessories-Stand
accessories-Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.1/10

5.3/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

6,000:1

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS8500  Contrast and black detail

Result

5,750:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,150:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,900:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,750:1

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,400:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Philips PUS8560 in the size version we tested is equipped with a VA panel. This means that black levels – for an LCD TV – can be considered decent. And that is indeed the case with this model. Both blacks and the overall impression of contrast in the movie scenes we tested are really quite good – the image doesn't bleed, and details are visible even in more challenging segments.

But the panel alone is not everything. Unfortunately, the PUS8500 does not come with local dimming (which is a given looking at the TV segment), so one has to reckon with the fact that in completely dark conditions, black can resemble shades of navy more than true black. On the other hand – and here's a plus for Philips – the Ambilight system does an excellent job. The backlighting really affects the perception of contrast. As a result, even if technically the black isn't perfect, the subjective experience of the picture becomes much more enjoyable. For many people, that's enough to make an evening viewing really spectacular.

It’s worth noting that the test concerns variants with a VA panel, which perform several times better in the categories of black levels and contrast than the 55-inch version equipped with an IPS panel. Thanks to the higher native contrast (although it’s not the top result among VA panels), the tested scenes looked significantly better – without noticeable greyish hues or the typical washed-out shadow effect found in IPS panels. The black levels in the U8092F model can be considered really good and satisfying, especially in this price range. Of course, this is not a design equipped with local dimming, so it’s hard to expect spectacular results in very challenging scenes. On the other hand, we’re talking about a remarkably budget-friendly television that performs quite solidly in its category.

HDR effect quality

4.8/10

3.1/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 90.4%, Bt.2020: 65.8%
DCI P3: 79.1%, Bt.2020: 58.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

273 nit

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

300 nit

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

324 nit

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

343 nit

Review Philips PUS8500  Brightness measurement

Result

334 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

212 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

173 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

265 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

90 nit

Review Samsung U8000F (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung U8000F (VA)

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

Philips PUS8500

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

When it comes to HDR performance on the PUS8560, it's safe to say that it's rather average. The brightness of the panel is around 350 nits, so we consider this to be the absolute minimum for watching content in this format. However, it’s not a result that will impress viewers looking for the best possible picture.

On the plus side, it's worth noting that the PUS8500 series – including the PUS8560/12 tested here – is marketed as a QLED television. And indeed, we can expect a wider colour gamut here. This model is equipped with an additional filter (PFS), and the DCI-P3 coverage of around 90% should suffice for most users. This filter operates very similarly to quantum dots. As a result, colours are quite well-saturated. It's not an outstanding result, but it's entirely sufficient for watching movies and series from streaming platforms.

While the U8000F with its VA panel can still be praised for decent blacks, there are no such accolades when it comes to brightness—particularly in HDR scenes. The television only achieves a maximum of just under 250 nits, which is simply too low to talk about any impressive light effects. Bright elements appear washed out, and scenes that should shine look rather flat. An interesting situation occurred during our testing of a scene from the movie Sicario 2— the screen noticeably darkened, as if the television was trying to hide its limitations in displaying blacks. One might get the impression that the device artificially darkens the image to improve contrast, but in practice, the effect doesn't make much difference, apart from the fact that we see less on the screen. Additionally, there’s the issue of colours—the U8000F doesn’t support a wide colour gamut, so one shouldn’t expect vibrant, saturated hues known from better models. The HDR image here resembles a slightly brightened SDR and... maybe that’s not such a bad thing. For this model, it’s not worth expecting a cinematic experience—better to treat HDR as a modest addition.

Factory color reproduction

6.2/10

6.5/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the television on the best available factory settings, that is, in Film/Filmmaker mode – this is the mode we recommend for everyday viewing. Unfortunately, it is not without its flaws. Both in HD and HDR content, the image had a distinct tendency to pinkness, caused by an excess of red and blue in the white balance. Another issue turned out to be excessive brightness of the image, as confirmed by both the gamma graph and the EOTF curve. This characteristic was responsible for the loss of detail and washed-out colours in more challenging HDR scenes we mentioned earlier. All of this led to quite significant colour reproduction errors – in extreme cases, the delta E value exceeded 7, while the threshold for visibility of errors for the human eye is about 3. This situation can be improved through calibration, and you can read about its effects below.

Samsung U8000F has been tested by us in the best picture mode it offers out of the box – that is, Filmmaker Mode. This profile is supposed to theoretically provide a neutral, cinematic image, free of unnecessary enhancements and artificial beautifications. In the case of SDR content – mainly in HD or SD resolution – the television already presented itself surprisingly reasonably right out of the box. The only noticeable imperfection was brightness management. The gamma chart showed some deviations – slight brightening or dimming of certain tones – but in practice, this did not significantly affect the viewing experience. For a television in this segment, it performs quite well.

However, the situation in HDR mode looks significantly weaker. Although white balance was still acceptable, colour errors were very evident. In the Color Checker test, almost every sample was outside the target point, and the image itself appeared unnatural – colours were skewed, sometimes too cool, and at other times simply dull and lifeless. The main issue lies in hardware limitations – the U8000F does not support the wide colour gamut of DCI-P3, so it is physically unable to reproduce the colours that the HDR standard intends. Unfortunately, this is evident in almost every more demanding scene.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.4/10

7.5/10

The Dutch manufacturer offers quite a large dose of settings in its products, so as usual, we decided to tinker with them a bit. The effects are immediately noticeable – we managed to correct the white balance, which made the image cease to appear overly pinkish. The brightness characteristics were also partially equalised, of course within the limits that the television itself allows. The picture is no longer so excessively brightened, and the overall reception after calibration is definitely better than in the factory settings of the Filmmaker mode.

You could only nitpick about the characteristics of the EOTF curve, which still indicates that the image tends to brighten HDR content. Despite our efforts, the darkest parts of the scenes can still be too bright, and the brightest ones do not always reach their full contrast potential. However, it must be clearly stated that we are dealing with a typically budget-oriented design – one cannot expect reference-quality rendering of HDR content from it.

Calibration has definitely helped this model – it improved the balance, toned down the aggressive colour palette, and brought the image closer to what one can expect from a well-configured movie mode. However, there are certain limitations that cannot be overcome.

Right out of the box, the U8000F offered a pretty decent picture in SDR for its price range. We managed to tweak it a bit further – we reduced a slight purple tint and improved the gamma characteristics, giving it a more natural curve. Despite these adjustments, the TV still has a tendency to overly brighten the brightest details – the gamma chart shows a clear break that cannot be fully corrected.

On the other hand, in HDR mode, it’s noticeably weaker. It's hard to talk about any significant improvement – despite attempts to fine-tune the settings, the picture still presents considerable colour errors. A Delta E exceeding 7 indicates noticeable deviations that we couldn’t effectively reduce. Unfortunately, this is a limitation of the construction itself – the U8000F simply wasn't designed for serious HDR. In daily SDR viewing, it performs quite well, but for HDR content... it’s best not to have overly high expectations.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.3/10

9.5/10

The PUS8560 handles colour blending into smooth gradients very well. During testing, the image appeared coherent and natural, with serious issues regarding tonal transitions occurring only in very dark scenes – for example, in a shot with red water, where subtle cut-offs between colours could be observed. However, these are rather exceptions that don’t spoil the perception of most content. It’s worth mentioning another phenomenon that has a greater impact on image quality – this relates to the so-called dithering, which is a slight “tingling” visible on solid backgrounds. This effect can be particularly noticeable in high-quality materials and may slightly detract from the impression of image clarity. It is for this fault that we deducted some points in the rating.

One of the essential elements affecting the perception of the image is the way in which the television handles tonal transitions – that is, blending colours and shades without clear boundaries. In the case of the Samsung U8092F model, this performed really well. On the test screens, we did not observe any visible banding or disturbances in the colour gradients. The image retains a natural character, without excessive digital interference, which unfortunately tends to be the norm in this class of equipment. Minimal imperfections appeared in very bright sections, but they are practically unnoticed and do not affect the daily use of the television.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.1/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

Philips PUS8560 offers a deinterlacing function, hidden under the name “distortion reduction”. And while it indeed serves its purpose, smoothing out problematic tonal transitions, it operates a bit too broadly. In practice, it affects not just colourful gradients but also softens faces, clothing textures, and furniture surfaces. This undermines the authenticity of the image – especially in films where natural texture is of great importance. However, if someone is looking for smoothing at any cost, it’s best to set this option to “Low”. For cinema image enthusiasts – we definitely do not recommend it.

On the plus side, the quality of scaling older materials is worth noting – the PUS8560 model handles them surprisingly well. The image retains a natural softness without artificially boosted sharpness. It’s also worth mentioning that the TV correctly displays very low-resolution content, avoiding issues with image cropping (so-called overscan).

When it comes to how the Samsung U8000F handles lower-quality materials, we have to admit that Samsung has made progress compared to its predecessor from last year – the DU7192 model, which theoretically occupies the same place in the lineup. This year’s model is equipped with a feature that improves the smoothness of tonal transitions, which has been implemented much better than last year. Yes, the television still uses quite strong algorithms that can distort details or remove film grain, but still – it can be confidently said that it works effectively. However, not everything has gone perfectly. The U8000F has noticeable issues with slight image stuttering when watching very old content in very low resolution. If someone plans to play their old VHS tape, they must be prepared for the image to look slightly “choppy”.

Blur and motion smoothness

4/10

5.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Nie
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
Nie
-
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
47%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Smużenie ():

Smużenie (Upłynniacz ruchu 4K@60Hz):

The Philips PUS8560 is a television equipped with a 60 Hz refresh rate panel, which already limits its capabilities for displaying dynamic content right from the start. Watching sports or playing on a console is not one of the more enjoyable experiences. The situation is further worsened by the absence of any option to improve film fluidity. In the menu, you won’t find settings that would allow for the activation of motion smoothing or even a slight motion blur for films recorded at 24 frames per second. You can imagine the effect. The image can appear choppy, especially in shots with panoramic camera movements.

The Samsung U8000F comes with a 60 Hz panel, so right from the start, it's clear that you can't expect miracles. It's simply the standard in this class – sufficient for everyday viewing, but without any fireworks. The TV offers one motion smoothing slider – a function called "Motion Blur Reduction", which allows us to adjust the smoothness of the image in films. Higher settings provide a more "theatrical" and smoothed effect, while lower settings maintain the original character of the film with a slight 24p effect. Interestingly, there is the "LED Clear Motion" feature, or BFI mode – which inserts black frames between the frames of the image to improve motion sharpness. However, in practice, the screen flickers significantly when this is activated, and it's best to treat this as more of an experiment rather than something that genuinely improves the gaming experience.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

4/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    No

Although the Philips PUS8560 is not designed with gamers in mind, the manufacturer has equipped it with a few features that may prove useful when connecting a console. Onboard, we find automatic switching to game mode (ALLM), as well as a simple connection status information bar – the so-called Game Bar. It doesn't make a particularly visual impression, but it serves its purpose. The presence of variable refresh rate (VRR), operating in the range of 48 to 60 Hz, may come as a surprise. This is not a wide range, but for less demanding games or titles with unstable frame rates, VRR can help reduce the tearing effect. However, this is the only element that can be considered beyond the minimum.

It must be clearly stated that the PUS8560 is not equipment for gamers looking for a responsive screen and full support for modern console features. It lacks HDMI 2.1 ports, the refresh rate is limited to 60 Hz, and the panel's response time is not among the fastest. This model may at best suit people who play occasionally and want to enjoy the Ambilight system.

Samsung U8000F offers a basic set of features for gamers, which can still prove sufficient for less demanding users. Here we have an automatic gaming mode – when a game is launched on the console, the TV switches to low-latency mode by itself, significantly improving response time. We also find the VRR feature, or variable refresh rate, which operates in the range of 48 to 60 Hz. This means that both Xbox and PS5 will not produce the 'tearing' effect on the screen – as long as we stay within this range.

Unfortunately, that's about it when it comes to advantages. Add-ons like Game Bar or higher refresh rates are reserved for higher models of Samsung from the 2025 line. In theory, the TV also supports the HGiG feature, which should adjust the HDR image to the intentions of game developers. Unfortunately – despite this feature appearing in advertising brochures and store materials – its setup on the Xbox console turned out, in practice, to be... impossible.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
11 ms
1080p120
2160p60
13 ms
11 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
12 ms
11 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The input lag on the PUS8560 is very good. When we previously mentioned that this screen is rather for the "casual gamer", there's nothing to be ashamed of in this regard – even compared to screens aimed at gamers. Results around 12 ms are truly remarkable, allowing for an enjoyable responsive gameplay experience. It doesn't matter whether we're playing in Full HD or 4K – the lag remains equally low, so if you're after a fast reaction time, the PUS8560 definitely won't disappoint in this area.

The Samsung U8092F performed phenomenally in our input lag tests. Regardless of the resolution, the results were very low, which is truly impressive for this price segment. One can confidently say that gaming on this TV will not cause frustration due to significant delays between what we do on the controller and what we see on the screen. For most gamers, even the more demanding ones, this result should be more than satisfactory.

Compatibility with PC

5.6/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
13ms
11ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

If we're talking about working with a PC on the PUS8560, it looks… quite strange. Chroma 4:4:4 is present in “Monitor” mode, but there’s a problem with grey fonts – not all subpixels light up, which makes the text appear jagged. Meanwhile, in “Game” mode, chroma 4:4:4 disappears, but the grey fonts look correct. In practice, we are therefore forced to juggle settings if we want to have perfectly readable text all the time. And what about gaming on a computer? Here our opinion remains unchanged compared to consoles – it’s possible, but without fireworks. There’s no variable refresh rate for G-SYNC graphics cards, and the refresh rate itself remains relatively low. On the plus side, we can once again highlight the very low input lag, which saves the situation in fast-paced games.

Working on the computer with this television is a true pleasure. The Samsung U8092F supports chroma 4:4:4, and even though it has a VA panel, the readability of text is very, very good. The television is also suitable for occasional PC gaming, mainly due to its low input lag. However, it should be noted that the G-Sync feature does not work on this model, which is strange because VRR worked without issue on the console.

Viewing angles

3.3/10

3.7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
68%
67%

The viewing angles on the PUS8560 are exactly what you'd expect from a VA panel - it's not the best. The image loses quality even with a slight shift off-axis – colours become washed out, and blacks start to resemble a dark navy. This is, of course, the price for the better contrast that VA offers head-on. In the case of our 55-inch model, it can still be acceptable, especially if the TV is positioned perfectly in front of the couch. But with larger screens or a less central setup in the living room – it could be a problem for comfortable viewing.

TV efficiency during daytime

4.9/10

3.8/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Samsung U8000F (VA): 204 cd/m2

Philips PUS8500 : 331 cd/m2

The PUS8560 performs reasonably well during the day... moderately. The satin finish of the panel does a pretty good job of reducing reflections, which means that light from windows or lamps doesn't interfere too much. The black levels also look decent for a VA panel – even in daylight, there aren't significant contrast losses. But the magic fades when it gets really bright. The panel's brightness is around 300 nits, which is definitely too little to speak of full comfort in a heavily sunlit room. In such conditions, the PUS8560 simply needs to be complemented with blinds – otherwise, the picture starts to look quite washed out.

Thanks to the satin finish of the Samsung U8092F panel, it handles reflection reduction quite well. The screen doesn't act like a mirror, and the colours – given the capabilities of this class of device – remain fairly saturated, even in somewhat brighter conditions. Unfortunately, the finish alone won't perform miracles. The TV is simply too dark to effectively cut through very challenging lighting conditions. If we place it opposite a light source (e.g. a large window or a strong lamp) – unfortunately, one must reckon with the fact that not everything will be clearly visible on it.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
PFS LED
White LED
Software version during testing
TPN256E_V056.002.127.051
1064
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity:

TV features

4.7/10

5.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Infrared
    Infrared
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    Yes
  • Wyszukiwanie głosowe
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

Classic TV Features:

If you’re looking for a TV that, in the basic sense, “works” – the PUS8560 will fill that role. In terms of classic features, we have a rather minimalist set. On the plus side, there’s an electronic program guide (EPG), teletext, a backlit remote with a classic numeric keypad, and a headphone jack input. It sounds a bit like a dream set for seniors – and there’s some truth to that. However, it must be said clearly: this is a TV with very limited capabilities. We won’t find USB recording from DVB tuners here, and there’s no Picture-in-Picture mode or other conveniences known from more expensive models.

Smart TV:

How does SmartTV fare on the PUS8560? Well, it gets a bit trickier here. The PUS8560 runs on the Titan OS, which in this particular implementation posed significant issues. Some functions, though present “on paper,” simply didn’t work. For example: Wireless screen mirroring features like Chromecast or Miracast – we tried to activate them with several different phones and laptops… without success. Perhaps this will be fixed in the future, but at the time of testing – it didn’t work. Also, the speed of the system left much to be desired – switching applications or home screens was simply slow. A substantial portion of the functions in the menu seem to be heavily hidden in the depths of a poorly organised system. To make matters worse, the library of available applications is quite limited. Although the situation with apps is better than last year, it’s still far from ideal. A modern remote tries to save the situation – slim, elegant, backlit and really well-made. Unfortunately, it operates on classic infrared, so you have to aim it at the screen. The only exception is voice control, which works via Bluetooth… it’s just a pity it doesn’t support Polish.

Samsung U8092F – like all this year's models from this brand – runs on the Tizen operating system. The system itself is really well developed: we have access to many applications (although not all), a well-developed smart home support, and various extras, including exclusive Samsung applications. There are also features like AirPlay and Chromecast, which allow us to easily connect our phone to the television and stream multimedia.

Unfortunately, as this is Samsung's cheapest series in 2025, the manufacturer decided not to include a solar remote. In the package, we find a classic infrared remote, which visually resembles the newer version, but unfortunately lacks voice functions. As for typical “television” extras – the recording function and the PiP (picture in picture) mode are missing. However, a plus is the HDMI eARC, which allows for easy control of the included remote for devices like a decoder or soundbar – and it does indeed work seamlessly.

Playing files from USB

8/10

8.7/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

PUS8560 handles most popular video and audio formats from USB memory without much hassle, so there's no need to elaborate on individual compatibilities. In everyday use, it should just work – and it does. The only thing worth noting is the handling of images. Although the television easily recognises popular extensions, with very high resolution graphic files, there are times when some images simply won't display. It might not be a major issue, but it's good to keep it in mind, especially if we want to view photographs straight from the camera. Besides that, PUS8560 shouldn't have any major problems playing files from USB.

Samsung U8092F handles playback of files fairly smoothly – the television supports most popular audio and video formats. Of course, it doesn't support Dolby Vision, but we simply won't find that in any Samsung model.

Some reservations can be made about the support for external text files – those that the user would like to add as subtitles to the film. During our tests, the television only played TXT files, and other formats, such as SRT or SUB, unfortunately did not work. This may not be a problem for everyone, but it's worth knowing. Perhaps it is an issue to be improved in the future with a software update for the television.

Apps

4.6/10

8.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
No
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
No
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

6.2/10

5.7/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    6.2/10
    5.7/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    Yes
    No

The television sounds quite pleasant, and it can confidently be said that the audio level will be fully adequate for most users – for both watching daily programs and enjoying an evening binge of a series. Moreover, it's a nice surprise that even in such an affordable Philips series, they decided to acquire licenses for full audio formats such as Dolby Atmos and DTS. This is great news for home theatre and soundbar owners, as it means complete compatibility and no need to "fiddle around" with connecting external devices.

U8092F doesn't pretend to have a home theatre on board. We get a standard set of 2 x 10 W, which sounds fine but without much emotion, though with a light bass. For everyday viewing, such an audio setup is more than sufficient. We were pleasantly surprised that it managed to play a film with the built-in Dolby Atmos codec (JOC) – although, of course, we're not talking about true surround sound here.