Philips PUS8359 (VA) vs SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED)

Direct compare

PUS8349 / PUS8359

S90FAE

Info

Available screen sizes: 50”

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”77”83”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.4

8.1

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.2

    8.3

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.4

    8.7

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.5

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.4

    9.6

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    4.7

    6.1

  • Utility functions

    5.3

    7.2

  • Apps

    6.2

    8.7

  • Sound quality

    6.1

    7.4

Advantages

  • Colour representation after calibration

  • Dynamic tone mapping function - recovers details that are too bright for the television

  • Smooth tonal transitions

  • Very good compatibility with computers and consoles - low input lag, chroma 4:4:4

  • Stunning black and contrast

  • High brightness for an OLED TV - 1200 nits peak brightness

  • Very good motion smoothness - 144Hz OLED display

  • Low latency - input lag 5ms

  • Gaming features: 4x HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, Game Motion Plus, etc.

  • PiP function and great support for external devices with solar remote control

  • Expanded operating system: Tizen

  • Pleasant sound with slightly noticeable bass

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness of HDR materials

  • Missing a significant number of essential applications

  • Poor viewing angles

  • Issues with playback of certain formats from USB.

  • Subtle degradation in tonal transitions (performs worse than the previous S90D)

  • Lack of support for DTS:X – an external amplifier is required for full support of this format

Our verdict

Philips PUS8359 in 50" is a fairly simple television, yet sufficiently advanced for a large portion of consumers. Its biggest distinguishing feature (as well as the entire brand) is the Ambilight backlighting, which at this price point is definitely an added value and something that may encourage a purchase. In this price range, it's hard to find anything that will give us flawless picture quality, although we can look for units that offer something more. And in our opinion, this tested television is precisely that. In this context, we pay particular attention to the quality of tonal transitions, colour reproduction after calibration, and the television's performance when connected to a computer. Thanks to its low input lag, a casual gaming session will be quite enjoyable. However, we must also point out the unit's drawbacks. Without a doubt, these will be low luminance in HDR content and narrow coverage of the DCI-P3 colour space. Although it’s worth noting that the dynamic tone mapping feature works very effectively. We will also briefly mention the contrast and black levels, which, while not exceptional, are definitely better than in units based on IPS/ADS panels. The operating system of the television can be considered one of the better ones, although it is in development and lacks many features, which we will discuss more in a dedicated paragraph. It also does not have as wide a library of applications as its competitors, although this will likely change soon. Who is the PUS8359 for? One could say it’s for anyone looking for a balance between quality and price.

Samsung S90F is an excellent representative of the premium mid-range in the world of OLED TVs. We have an organic matrix here that guarantees perfect contrast – and no matter how much LCD manufacturers try with local dimming in Mini LEDs, this black simply cannot be replicated. The S90F shows its class without any compromises. Compared to last year's model, we get a slightly brighter WOLED panel, which in favourable conditions can reach up to 1200 nits. This is a result that suffices for comfortable viewing of HDR materials in most scenes at reference quality – especially on streaming platforms such as Netflix. The picture quality here is very high, regardless of whether we are watching a movie, playing on a console, or streaming a sports broadcast. By the way – versatility is one of the biggest advantages of this model. With 144 Hz refresh rate, very low input lag, and a full package of gaming features (including functional HGiG and the unique Game Motion Plus motion smoother), it's hard to complain about anything here. The Tizen system performed really well on the S90F. It has its limitations – primarily the closed ecosystem and a smaller selection of apps than Google TV – but if you mainly use the most popular services, this shouldn't be an issue. A big plus is also the remote, which can operate most connected devices – even despite the lack of a numeric keypad. There are downsides too. The built-in media player has issues with some formats, and the anti-reflective coating typical of WOLEDs doesn’t handle strong light very well – reflections can be noticeable. We also do not have support for DTS and Dolby Vision, but this is a standard at Samsung that's been expected for years. So is the S90F with a WOLED panel the perfect TV? No – but it really is very close. It is one of the most polished and complete OLEDs in this price range, which can easily handle any content, from a series on Netflix, to console gaming, to a Sunday match.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Toslink (Optical audio), IR (remote)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Premium
Stand type
Legs
Central
Stand type
stand-type-Graphite
stand-type-Graphite
Stand
stand-Fixed
stand-Fixed
FlatDesign
Nie
Yes
Accessories
accessories-Stand
accessories-Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.6/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,400:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,650:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,800:1

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Philips PUS8359/12 in the 50-inch version is equipped with a VA panel. We highlight this quite strongly, as the manufacturer is known for intermittently using IPS/ADS panels depending on the diagonal size. This is particularly important in the context of contrast and black levels, which are the primary criteria in assessing image quality. The panel itself uses direct LED backlighting; however, it has not been supported by any local dimming system, which is rather obvious when considering the device's price range. Nevertheless, the use of this type of screen allows for several rows of better black levels and contrast compared to the aforementioned panels that do not have advanced backlighting systems. The simple design of the television has positively affected the visibility of details in the blacks. Our first test scene from the film "Oblivion" showcased quite good blacks, but also excellent separation of lights, which is not an easy task even for much more expensive units. The second material prepared from the film Sicario 2 also presented itself decently. Although due to construction flaws, some light bleeding can be noticed, the details themselves are well visible, and it's hard to criticize them. The fact remains, the black levels could be deeper.

In the case of the Samsung S90F, we are dealing with an interesting situation: nearly all size variants have been equipped with WOLED panels, except for the 65-inch version, which received a QD-OLED panel. In this test, we analyse the version with the WOLED panel produced by LG Display, but the question remains; Does this affect the quality of black and contrast in this part of the test? In practice – it does not. Regardless of the technology used, both panels can produce perfect black and infinite contrast. This is exactly what we expect from any top-tier television. Watching a series in the evening, in a completely dark room, is sheer pleasure. The television easily separates bright elements – such as reflections or background lights – from the deep, dark parts of the image, without creating any halo or brightness issues that high-end LCD televisions still struggle with. This is where OLED technology shows its strength – and the S90F is no exception. When it comes to black and contrast, we can't fault it at all.

HDR effect quality

4.6/10

7.2/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 83.0%, Bt.2020: 61.0%
DCI P3: 95.2%, Bt.2020: 70.1%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

281 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

280 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

324 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

290 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

320 nit

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1099 nit

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1177 nit

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1252 nit

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

1183 nit

Review SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED) Brightness measurement

Result

577 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

HDR luminance chart:

SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED)

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

Philips PUS8359 (VA)

Luminancja HDR

Luminance of RGB colors

Philips PUS8359 didn't impress us with its performance in HDR materials. This model is capable of generating a maximum brightness of 320 nits, and often even less. Such results, combined with the lack of support for HDR Dolby Vision, mean that the image will be significantly darker compared to the source material. Therefore, it would be more beneficial for this television to play SDR content. This is also suggested by the quite low coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut at 83%, resulting in significant colour deficiencies. The fact remains that the television supports an HDR format based on dynamic metadata; however, HDR10+ is such a niche format that it doesn't offer any major advantages.

Does the S90F handle not only blacks but also bright parts of the image? Definitely. The stories about OLEDs as "dark screens" can slowly be regarded as myth. The Samsung S90F, like the LG C5 based on a very similar panel, achieves brightness exceeding 1000 nits. This is a value more than enough to enjoy impressive and dynamic HDR images – both in movies and series. Most of the scenes we tested look stunning, with well-defined highlights and high contrast. Of course, OLED technology still has its limitations – in very bright, full-screen sequences, such as the test card from the movie The Meg (photo 5), the television may noticeably dim the image. However, it should be emphasized that such scenes are rare. It can be said that the HDR effect is good enough that even mid-range OLED models like the S90F can provide a cinematic experience in the home living room.

Factory color reproduction

4/10

7/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode in terms of fidelity to the source material was "Film". This is what we used during our tests. Just like every other factory mode in televisions, it had its drawbacks. So we'll check what exactly was wrong with both SDR and HDR materials. In both cases, the white balance exhibited an excessive dominance of the green and red colour combination. This created a yellow tint spreading across the entire image, causing issues such as yellowed whites and problems with skin tones. This state of affairs was perfectly illustrated on the "ColourChecker" palette, where each of the tested samples was pushed towards its warmer counterparts. The foundation of the image is primarily contrast and black. These are represented by gamma charts and the EOTF curve. Looking at the first one, we can see a true rollercoaster, as both elevated and lowered gamma can be observed. The heavily elevated gamma caused visibility issues in black levels, whereas the lowered gamma resulted in a dramatic reduction in contrast. In this context, the EOTF curve performed significantly better, as it only slightly brightened the image.

Samsung S90F, like most modern televisions, offers many picture modes, but – following our testing tradition – we checked it out in the best one, which is the Filmmaker mode. Thanks to this, the image looks much more natural than in the default, often oversaturated settings. It was neither overly saturated nor artificially dimmed – simply closer to what one should see. Of course, “more accurate” doesn’t mean “perfect”. Unfortunately, our S90F had significant issues with white balance, particularly in the blue color range, resulting in a slightly yellowish filter being applied to most scenes. Someone might say it looks more “filmic” – because it’s warmer – but let’s not kid ourselves, George Lucas didn’t film Star Wars in sepia 😉 (you’ll find a comparison with the scene below as always).

Additionally, in HDR materials, there was an issue with brightness management. The EOTF curve showed a clear “spike” in brightness – the television brightened the image more than it should have, causing some effects to look too intense and deviating from the reference. Fortunately, some of these problems can be eliminated through professional calibration – you’ll read about its effects later in the review.

Color reproduction after calibration

5/10

9.2/10

Philips provides a wide range of image calibration tools in both its higher-end and budget models. We utilised these tools and got to work, which wasn’t as easy as many of you might think. While we managed to model the white balance, significantly improve the gamma, and refine the EOTF curve in both cases, the deltaE errors remained exceptionally high. There are several reasons for this situation, which are directly related to the low coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut and the maximum brightness of the unit in HDR material.

After calibration, we managed to eliminate practically all the previously mentioned errors. Older movies in SDR quality finally look like they should – without the sepia effect or artificial aging of the image. The atmosphere of the classics is back in place (no thanks needed, Star Wars fans), and the colours no longer resemble an Instagram filter.

One of the key changes was also the improvement of brightness characteristics in HDR content. We managed to control the EOTF curve in almost a reference manner. Admittedly, the most demanding users may detect minimal deviations in brightness, but honestly – most viewers won't even notice that. And it's no surprise because the vast majority of errors fall below the ΔE 3 value, which is below the threshold of visibility. After calibration, the S90F (WOLED) becomes a truly excellent display – one on which you can enjoy nearly perfect image quality.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.4/10

7.3/10

The fluidity of gradation in PUS8359 is at a good level. Practically every scene has preserved tonal transitions. The most difficult scene, which is the second from the film "The Green Knight", turned out not to be the proverbial "killer" and showed that the tested television, given its price range, performs excellently. The only thing we can "pick at" is the darkest scenes, where some inconsistencies can be seen here and there, but this is rather selective. Nonetheless, we rate the fluidity of tonal transitions very well. However, we must mention that this feature is not available in HDR materials.

No and here we must honestly admit – the S90F has somewhat let us down. Compared to last year's S90D model with a WOLED panel (very similar to the one used this year), this year's Samsung performed worse. And this is not only against its main competitor, LG C5, but even when compared to its older brother. The biggest issues arise in dark scenes, where difficulties with smooth colour transitions are noticeable – the screen slightly steps the tonal transitions, causing some sections to lose their naturalness. We’re not sure what exactly went wrong – perhaps it's a software issue or a different processing algorithm. It's a shame, because we hoped that the level from last year would at least be maintained. Unfortunately, it's a step backwards.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

7.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
No
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

In this paragraph, we will look at two functionalities. We will once again take a look at the feature responsible for tonal transitions, but we will also check how the television handles image scaling. The option responsible for smooth gradation is called "Distortion Reduction." As we have established, it quite effectively smooths out inconsistencies. However, we must point out two things: we cannot enable it for HDR material, and it blurs details in films.

The tested television does not boast the best image scaling. The overall blurriness of the image is quite noticeable, but what’s worse, it blurs details. This is particularly evident on the branches and hair of the model. There is also a characteristic white halo around the character.

Digital Image Processing in S90F:

Fortunately, Samsung, like in most of its models, manages to effectively tackle the unwanted posterisation effect in the S90F. The function responsible for this element is noise reduction, which does a pretty good job of smoothing tonal transitions and eliminating unnatural colour blending – of course, within its capabilities. Unfortunately, it works quite aggressively, so using it comes with trade-offs. In addition to improving gradation, it can also remove film grain or slightly soften facial features. In this case, the choice is yours – do you prefer a more "clean" image, or do you care about preserving the original texture of the material.

Image Scaling in S90F:

In this year's model, Samsung has implemented its proprietary AI processor – NQ4 Gen3, which really handles upscaling quite well. In our test scenes, the TV effectively "pulled up" lower quality towards artificial 4K – the image was more enjoyable to view, and the differences in sharpness between native and scaled content were minimal. Unfortunately, behind all this AI marketing façade lies a certain shortcoming. The S90F struggles with overscan. If you reach for truly archival material – e.g. a VHS tape of your parents' wedding – you have to reckon with the fact that the lower part of the image may get cut off. The function to adapt the image to resolution simply does not work as it should here.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.8/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
-
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
-
Nie
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
49%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Philips PUS8359 will not be the best television for sports. The reason for this is the lack of implementation of even the basic motion smoothing feature, which was to be expected given the price of the device. We also note that we are dealing with a VA panel, whose sharpness does not stand at the highest level by itself. This type of panel is mainly associated with high contrast, which comes with a rather slow response time, as we can clearly read from the matrix analysis results. As you can see, from the pictures captured in fast motion, the image is blurred typically for this type of panel. While it may not be the ideal option, it can conditionally be used for watching sports; however, one must keep in mind the less-than-sharp motion. It is worth mentioning that movies will be characterised by judder since the television does not possess any, not even the simplest, motion smoother.

S90F really handles motion excellently – after all, it’s an OLED with a 144 Hz panel, so sports and games look absolutely stunning on it. The image is smooth, clear, and there’s no room for ghosting or blurring, which can sometimes plague cheaper LCDs.

The TV also comes equipped with motion smoothness settings that allow you to customise everything to your liking. We have motion blur reduction and judder reduction – you can set it so that the image is super smooth (even to the point of looking a bit soap opera-like), or more cinematic, with the classic “jumpiness” of 24 frames. The choice is yours, Samsung imposes nothing.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

9.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    60
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

It won’t be a surprise if we say that Philips PUS8359/12 only has the most basic support for consoles. Once we connect the console, we can expect features like VRR and ALLM. This is quite pleasing for the former, as life has shown that even in more expensive units, there can be issues with this. A nice touch is the implementation of a special GameBar that allows changing settings on the "fly", so we won't have to exit the gameplay and become unnecessarily distracted. This feature also allows for adapting the gameplay to the needs of individuals with disabilities, which will certainly be extremely beneficial.

When it comes to gaming features – the S90F has absolutely nothing to complain about. Aside from the lack of Dolby Vision, which is already the norm for Samsung. The television operates at 144 Hz, has four HDMI 2.1 ports, so you can easily connect more than one console or PC. Onboard, we also find Game Bar – a practical tool that allows you to quickly preview picture settings, VRR status, ALLM mode, and other useful options. Game Motion Plus deserves special mention – Samsung's proprietary motion smoother that actually works sensibly in games. The image appears smoother, but without any artificial effects or slowdowns.

It's also worth mentioning the HGiG feature, which – and this may be a slight surprise – works correctly. We bring this up because Samsung clearly messed something up in one of the recent updates, and in some models, the option responsible for HGiG simply... disappears from the menu. Setting it up becomes almost impossible. Fortunately, our S90F unit did not have this issue, but the situation is dynamic, so it's worth keeping this in mind and regularly checking for new software versions and information from the manufacturer.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
11 ms
1080p120
6 ms
2160p60
12 ms
11 ms
2160p120
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
10 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The measured input lag when connected to the console was very good, with nothing to pick at. Both at FHD and 4K settings, we recorded delays of 12ms, and when adding the HDR format to the higher resolution, the lag dropped to 11ms. Each of these results should be considered more than satisfactory, as such a level allows for gameplay that is practically free of delays between controller, eye, and screen.

Input lag in the S90F is at a level that's practically monitor-like. Under the best conditions, it achieved a score of 5 ms, which is an absolutely stunning result – even a benchmark for the most demanding gamers. Whether you're playing fast-paced shooters, fighting games, or simply need instant response – the S90F does not disappoint in this regard at all.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
11ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RWBG
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

Connecting the Philips PUS8359 to a computer won't create major complications in terms of gaming. The latency is at a very good level, and working at 4K HDR settings was associated with an 11 ms input lag, which is an imperceptible value on the line from eye to screen to mouse. The tested TV also supports chroma 4:4:4, making work with text files convenient. This model does not support G-Sync and offers a refresh rate of 60 Hz, which can be a significant drawback for PC gamers. Therefore, the gaming rating is lower, although the device performs excellently in everyday office tasks.

S90F is a great tool for both gaming on PC and daily work. Gamers can rest easy – the TV effortlessly supports image synchronisation with NVIDIA graphics cards thanks to G-Sync, and the 144 Hz refresh rate combined with very low input lag only confirms this. S90F also excels as a monitor for working with text. Of course, the readability of fonts may be slightly compromised by the characteristic pixel structure in the RWGB arrangement, but this is a topic well known primarily to those who work with a lot of text, code, or Excel spreadsheets. For most users, this will be perfectly acceptable.

Viewing angles

3.4/10

7.4/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
65%
31%

The decrease in brightness at a 45-degree angle is 65%. This means that even a slight shift from the center of the screen can cause discomfort related to color degradation and image fading. This is rather a characteristic feature of the vast majority of VA panels that lack an angle coating.

The viewing angles on the S90F are very good, although it must be honestly admitted that they are slightly inferior to the 65" version with the QD-OLED panel. Nevertheless, the picture quality at wide angles performs very well – colours remain vivid, and brightness doesn’t drop dramatically when viewed from the side. There's no need to move the TV closer to see a clear image. For most users, this level is more than sufficient.

TV efficiency during daytime

4.7/10

6.1/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

SAMSUNG S90F (WOLED): 405 cd/m2

Philips PUS8359 (VA): 318 cd/m2

The screen Philips PUS8359/12 has a satin finish. This type of panel finish allows for quite good performance in keeping light reflections in check and provides fairly comfortable viewing of the television during the day. It’s worth mentioning that the maximum brightness of the television in SDR content is about 320 nits, which is a reasonable result, especially since the brightness is maintained even at 100% screen white fill.

S90F is really bright for an OLED TV. Of course, it shouldn’t be compared to Mini-LED TVs or the brightest high-end OLEDs, but under normal lighting conditions, it’s easy to watch something during the day. The brightness is high enough that there’s no need to close the curtains every time a movie or series is turned on. However, it’s important to remember that the anti-reflective coating on WOLED panels is not the best. Reflections can be noticeable, especially with bright light coming in from the window. In such cases, it’s best to reach for curtains.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
White LED
Software version during testing
V246.003.000.131
T-RSMFDEUC-0090-103 2.5, E2500007, BT-S
Image processor
nie wiem ale chyba tredriper

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

TV features

5.3/10

7.2/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Other inputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), IR (remote)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    Yes
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    No
    Yes
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Wyszukiwanie głosowe
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

It’s hard not to mention the biggest differentiator of the manufacturer’s TVs first. We’re of course talking about the colorful Ambilight backlighting, which is placed on the back of the device and displays colours customised to what’s happening on the screen, often allowing for an even greater immersive experience. The operating system responsible for the TV’s functioning is Philips' proprietary system cleverly named TitanOs. It is definitely more closed off and limited in terms of app resources than is the case with this manufacturer’s TVs based on GoogleTv. Besides the lack of significant applications, its closed nature also reveals itself in another aspect. We won’t be able to do basic things like programming recordings or recording to USB. People using Apple devices may also feel disappointed by the absence of AirPlay, which allows for easy screen streaming. Fortunately, there is an option to connect a keyboard and mouse for easier navigation through the TV’s menu. It’s worth mentioning that there is the possibility of connecting headphones, but only wired ones. If we plug them in, we can also play audio through the TV’s speakers. It’s also worth adding that controlling the TV happens via IR, not Bluetooth, which is quite inconvenient these days.

In summary: TitanOs has quite a few “buts,” especially when we are aware users needing and using various streaming platforms. It’s rather an option for those limiting themselves to the so-called holy trinity, which is Netflix, YouTube, and CDA.

Samsung S90F is equipped with a range of classic TV features, such as EPG, CI module, and headphone support, but there’s also more to it. Thanks to the presence of several tuners, the TV offers a picture-in-picture (PiP) function – very useful, for example, when we are watching one match but want to check the score of another match happening simultaneously. It's a pity that Samsung has completely abandoned the USB recording feature for some time now, but this is partially compensated by good integration with decoders and other devices. The remote – while small and lacking a numeric keypad – allows you to control multiple devices connected to the TV. You can easily manage a decoder, amplifier, console, or other gear with it – all without needing to reach for several remotes.

As for the Smart TV system – Tizen on the S90F operates very smoothly, which is not a given in cheaper models with this system. The system itself is extensive and offers plenty of features – we have screen mirroring, AirPlay, Bluetooth device support, and quite a few options related to smart home functionality, such as controlling bulbs or other smart devices directly from the TV. However, it’s important to remember that Tizen is a closed system, so when it comes to apps – we are limited to what we find in the Samsung store. And while it is quite extensive, it doesn’t match the flexibility of the Google TV platform. It’s worth keeping this in mind if you have specific needs for niche applications.

Playing files from USB

8/10

8/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
No
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
No
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
No
Yes

The default media player built into Philips PUS8359/12 offers quite a wide range of capabilities, but it also has its limitations. It plays virtually all video formats, with the obvious exception of Dolby Vision and the less obvious .asf, which is not commonly encountered. However, the issue lies in the lack of the H.265 HEVC codec at high bitrate. When it comes to photos, the player performs adequately, but it lacks support for some popular resolutions and formats, such as HEIC, used on Apple devices. The player performs best with audio, where it can be praised. Unfortunately, due to system limitations, there is no possibility to expand its features, which means we are left with what the manufacturer has provided.

The built-in media player in the S90F is alright and supports quite a few popular formats. Unfortunately, during testing – once again – we encountered issues, despite the manufacturer's claims. The television did not play some formats that are supposedly supported, such as HEIC photos (Apple's version), or SRT and SUB subtitle files. In everyday use for most people, such a player will be sufficient to play a movie from a USB drive, but it’s worth keeping in mind that surprises may occur. Perhaps the situation will be improved in future updates, but at the time of writing this review – it works as it works.

Apps

6.2/10

8.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

6.1/10

7.4/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The built-in audio system in the Philips PUS8359 consists of a basic connection of speakers 2x 10 W each. As you can probably guess, you can't expect too much from such a configuration. Nevertheless, if we don't exceed 50% of the maximum volume, it won't give us any negative thoughts. We definitely recommend connecting even cheaper soundbars. These, due to a range of codecs prepared by the manufacturer, will certainly work very well. It's worth noting the implementation of Dolby Atmos and DTS-HD Master Audio.

The S90F plays really quite nicely, with noticeable bass and pretty good dynamics. A definite plus is the support for Dolby Atmos, which allows the TV to sound a bit more “spatial” – of course, as much as the built-in 2.1 set allows 😉. Unfortunately, as is often the case with Samsung, it lacks support for the DTS:X format. So, if you want to take advantage of its capabilities, you'll need to connect your audio equipment directly to the amplifier, rather than to the TV itself – otherwise, it just won't work.