Philips PUS8359 (VA) vs LG UA75006LA (VA)

Direct comparison

PUS8349 / PUS8359

Available screen sizes: 50”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.4

6.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.2

    6.0

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.4

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.5

    5.0

  • Gaming on console

    6.4

    6.9

  • TV as a computer monitor

    6.0

    5.4

  • Watching in bright light

    4.7

    4.6

  • Utility functions

    5.3

    7.0

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    6.1

    6.0

Advantages

  • Colour representation after calibration

  • Dynamic tone mapping function - recovers details that are too bright for the television

  • Smooth tonal transitions

  • Very good compatibility with computers and consoles - low input lag, chroma 4:4:4

  • High native contrast (VA panel), better black levels, less "flattened" image in evening screenings

  • Proper upscaling and decent tonal gradient transitions

  • webOS system with a rich app base and support for AirPlay

  • Ability to record to USB from built-in tuners

  • Low input lag (below 10 ms)

  • Friendly for the "Sunday gamer": ALLM, VRR (48–60 Hz), Game Bar, HGiG

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low brightness of HDR materials

  • Missing a significant number of essential applications

  • Poor viewing angles

  • Limited colour gamut coverage (approx. 80% DCI-P3), HDR rather symbolic

  • No dynamic HDR formats (Dolby Vision, HDR10+)

  • Typical viewing angle issues for VA panels

  • Quite a plastic casing and no Magic remote included

Our verdict

Philips PUS8359 in 50" is a fairly simple television, yet sufficiently advanced for a large portion of consumers. Its biggest distinguishing feature (as well as the entire brand) is the Ambilight backlighting, which at this price point is definitely an added value and something that may encourage a purchase. In this price range, it's hard to find anything that will give us flawless picture quality, although we can look for units that offer something more. And in our opinion, this tested television is precisely that. In this context, we pay particular attention to the quality of tonal transitions, colour reproduction after calibration, and the television's performance when connected to a computer. Thanks to its low input lag, a casual gaming session will be quite enjoyable. However, we must also point out the unit's drawbacks. Without a doubt, these will be low luminance in HDR content and narrow coverage of the DCI-P3 colour space. Although it’s worth noting that the dynamic tone mapping feature works very effectively. We will also briefly mention the contrast and black levels, which, while not exceptional, are definitely better than in units based on IPS/ADS panels. The operating system of the television can be considered one of the better ones, although it is in development and lacks many features, which we will discuss more in a dedicated paragraph. It also does not have as wide a library of applications as its competitors, although this will likely change soon. Who is the PUS8359 for? One could say it’s for anyone looking for a balance between quality and price.

LG UA7500 in the VA panel variant is a television designed for daily watching of TV, YouTube or streaming platforms, where SDR content still dominates. It performs this role very well – it has decent digital image processing, respectable upscaling and quite consistent tonal transitions. The biggest advantage remains the webOS system, full of applications and features, such as USB recording, AirPlay support, and screen mirroring. For many people, this is enough to consider it a "daily television". It also works reasonably well as a screen for the casual gamer – even though it only has a 60 Hz panel, it includes ALLM, VRR in the range of 48–60 Hz, and a convenient Game Bar, which are usually reserved for more expensive models. Downsides? Primarily the viewing angles – as is typical with VA panels, the image quickly loses quality from the side. There are also no dynamic HDR formats, and the limited colour gamut means that cinematic "HDR effects" come off quite insignificantly. On the other hand, this is an affordable television that is likely to see attractive discounts, so if someone doesn’t want to spend a fortune and accepts its limitations, they get a solid "everyday model" with a good system. It’s just a pity that the manufacturer didn’t include the Magic remote in the package.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Average
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.6/10

5.8/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,400:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,650:1

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,800:1

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

6,350:1

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,800:1

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,350:1

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,900:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Philips PUS8359/12 in the 50-inch version is equipped with a VA panel. We highlight this quite strongly, as the manufacturer is known for intermittently using IPS/ADS panels depending on the diagonal size. This is particularly important in the context of contrast and black levels, which are the primary criteria in assessing image quality. The panel itself uses direct LED backlighting; however, it has not been supported by any local dimming system, which is rather obvious when considering the device's price range. Nevertheless, the use of this type of screen allows for several rows of better black levels and contrast compared to the aforementioned panels that do not have advanced backlighting systems. The simple design of the television has positively affected the visibility of details in the blacks. Our first test scene from the film "Oblivion" showcased quite good blacks, but also excellent separation of lights, which is not an easy task even for much more expensive units. The second material prepared from the film Sicario 2 also presented itself decently. Although due to construction flaws, some light bleeding can be noticed, the details themselves are well visible, and it's hard to criticize them. The fact remains, the black levels could be deeper.

This is where the biggest advantage of the VA panel version begins. A contrast ratio of around 6000:1 means that during evening viewing, the picture gains depth, and darker scenes in films appear natural and do not fade into grey. It's clear that the blacks are much better than in the IPS panel variant, and this difference is what defines the character of the television. Of course, it's important to remember that the UA7500 does not have local dimming, so one shouldn't expect miracles. The darkest shots won't match those of more expensive televisions, but at least the contrast is stable and sufficient for convincing evening viewing.

HDR effect quality

4.6/10

4.3/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 83.0%, Bt.2020: 61.0%
DCI P3: 79.4%, Bt.2020: 59.2%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

281 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

280 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

324 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

290 nit

Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

320 nit

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

300 nit

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

263 nit

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

366 nit

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

218 nit

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

351 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG UA75006LA (VA)

Philips PUS8359 (VA)

Philips PUS8359 didn't impress us with its performance in HDR materials. This model is capable of generating a maximum brightness of 320 nits, and often even less. Such results, combined with the lack of support for HDR Dolby Vision, mean that the image will be significantly darker compared to the source material. Therefore, it would be more beneficial for this television to play SDR content. This is also suggested by the quite low coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut at 83%, resulting in significant colour deficiencies. The fact remains that the television supports an HDR format based on dynamic metadata; however, HDR10+ is such a niche format that it doesn't offer any major advantages.

LG UA7500 with a VA panel has brightness peaking around 350 nits, which, by today's standards, isn't very impressive. It's hard to talk about a true HDR experience here – most content looks more like classic SDR with a slight attempt to boost highlights. One advantage is that regardless of the test content, the effect remained relatively stable. However, we noticed that in very extreme scenes with a lot of fine details, the television can slightly dim the image in order to achieve better blacks, but this comes at the expense of the visibility of bright effects. On the downside, it should be noted that the UA7500 is not equipped with any additional technologies to expand the colours. It's neither a QLED panel nor PFS LED, which means the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut is just 80%, making many HDR films look flat and failing to capture the full diversity of colours.

Factory color reproduction

4/10

5.6/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode in terms of fidelity to the source material was "Film". This is what we used during our tests. Just like every other factory mode in televisions, it had its drawbacks. So we'll check what exactly was wrong with both SDR and HDR materials. In both cases, the white balance exhibited an excessive dominance of the green and red colour combination. This created a yellow tint spreading across the entire image, causing issues such as yellowed whites and problems with skin tones. This state of affairs was perfectly illustrated on the "ColourChecker" palette, where each of the tested samples was pushed towards its warmer counterparts. The foundation of the image is primarily contrast and black. These are represented by gamma charts and the EOTF curve. Looking at the first one, we can see a true rollercoaster, as both elevated and lowered gamma can be observed. The heavily elevated gamma caused visibility issues in black levels, whereas the lowered gamma resulted in a dramatic reduction in contrast. In this context, the EOTF curve performed significantly better, as it only slightly brightened the image.

The Filmmaker Mode on the LG UA7500 performs better than one might expect from such a budget TV, but let's not get carried away with the praise. The image is reasonably well put together and at first glance doesn't irritate, however, its weaknesses quickly start to emerge. This is most apparent in scenes with bright points – lamps in the background or reflections of light on the skin are clearly exaggerated. Faces of characters often look unnatural, as if they have been "burned out." Additionally, the default gamma setting brightens the smallest details and causes the image to lose subtlety in the darker areas. That said, for its price range, the UA7500 in factory mode offers a pretty decent starting point. However, it is clear that without additional adjustments, these issues cannot be avoided, which is why – similar to other TVs – we decided to check what could be achieved after calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

5/10

7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

Philips provides a wide range of image calibration tools in both its higher-end and budget models. We utilised these tools and got to work, which wasn’t as easy as many of you might think. While we managed to model the white balance, significantly improve the gamma, and refine the EOTF curve in both cases, the deltaE errors remained exceptionally high. There are several reasons for this situation, which are directly related to the low coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut and the maximum brightness of the unit in HDR material.

The biggest improvement we noticed was while calibrating the mode designed for daily SDR content. We managed to smooth out the white balance in an acceptable manner and tackle the issue of excessive brightening of small elements due to the gamma characteristic. As a result, the image gained the consistency and naturalness that was lacking in the factory settings. After such correction, we can confidently state that for everyday TV content, programs, or materials from YouTube, the LG UA7500 performs really well – especially after professional calibration. The situation looks a bit different for HDR content. Here, calibration helped to tame the white balance and slightly improved brightness management, but the limitations of the design are immediately apparent. The lack of additional filters to expand the colour palette means that the most vivid colors appear flat, and the image lacks the intensity we would expect from good HDR. So, in SDR, the UA7500 performs quite well, but in HDR – despite corrections – it remains far behind, and this is a characteristic that one must accept when choosing this television.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.4/10

8.8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The fluidity of gradation in PUS8359 is at a good level. Practically every scene has preserved tonal transitions. The most difficult scene, which is the second from the film "The Green Knight", turned out not to be the proverbial "killer" and showed that the tested television, given its price range, performs excellently. The only thing we can "pick at" is the darkest scenes, where some inconsistencies can be seen here and there, but this is rather selective. Nonetheless, we rate the fluidity of tonal transitions very well. However, we must mention that this feature is not available in HDR materials.

The colour transitions in most scenes were smooth and difficult for the average viewer to notice. However, the VA panel variant offered something more – in the darker parts of the image, it was possible to see many more shades, as the higher contrast allowed them to stand out better. As a result, the image did not appear flat and looked more natural. The transitions between colours were generally quite good and did not distract from the content.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
No
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

In this paragraph, we will look at two functionalities. We will once again take a look at the feature responsible for tonal transitions, but we will also check how the television handles image scaling. The option responsible for smooth gradation is called "Distortion Reduction." As we have established, it quite effectively smooths out inconsistencies. However, we must point out two things: we cannot enable it for HDR material, and it blurs details in films.

The tested television does not boast the best image scaling. The overall blurriness of the image is quite noticeable, but what’s worse, it blurs details. This is particularly evident on the branches and hair of the model. There is also a characteristic white halo around the character.

LG UA7500 with a VA panel has shown itself in this category in a really good light. Image scaling from Full HD or even SD materials was surprisingly smooth. The picture looked smooth, edges were not overly jagged, and the television maintained a good amount of detail, ensuring that even older films did not lose their character. It particularly excelled with faces – there were no artificial contours or "mask" effects, which often occur in cheaper models. The way the television handled tonal transitions in lower quality materials is also noteworthy. Thanks to digital processing, colours did not bleed into one another, and gradients looked natural and smooth. There was no question of intrusive smoothing of the image or loss of cinematic grain. This makes the UA7500 great for everyday content – from free-to-air television, to sports matches, all the way to YouTube, where we often watch materials in various resolutions.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.8/10

4/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
-
No
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Philips PUS8359 will not be the best television for sports. The reason for this is the lack of implementation of even the basic motion smoothing feature, which was to be expected given the price of the device. We also note that we are dealing with a VA panel, whose sharpness does not stand at the highest level by itself. This type of panel is mainly associated with high contrast, which comes with a rather slow response time, as we can clearly read from the matrix analysis results. As you can see, from the pictures captured in fast motion, the image is blurred typically for this type of panel. While it may not be the ideal option, it can conditionally be used for watching sports; however, one must keep in mind the less-than-sharp motion. It is worth mentioning that movies will be characterised by judder since the television does not possess any, not even the simplest, motion smoother.

LG UA7500 is a TV with a 60 Hz panel, so it’s hard to expect any raving reviews in this category. It’s more of a screen meant for everyday content or an evening movie session rather than for following dynamic sporting events or playing action games. It's evident that the manufacturer targeted this model precisely at this group of consumers – and in that regard, it performs adequately. We get the TruMotion function, which is a motion smoother. It’s simple, has only one slider, but it can make a noticeable difference. In the lower range, the image looks more raw and cinematic, while at higher values, the motion becomes smoother and more pleasant to the eye.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    60
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

It won’t be a surprise if we say that Philips PUS8359/12 only has the most basic support for consoles. Once we connect the console, we can expect features like VRR and ALLM. This is quite pleasing for the former, as life has shown that even in more expensive units, there can be issues with this. A nice touch is the implementation of a special GameBar that allows changing settings on the "fly", so we won't have to exit the gameplay and become unnecessarily distracted. This feature also allows for adapting the gameplay to the needs of individuals with disabilities, which will certainly be extremely beneficial.

LG UA7500 is a TV that can be comfortably recommended to "Sunday" gamers. While it doesn't feature a 120 Hz panel or HDMI 2.1 ports, meaning it can't fully utilise the potential of modern consoles, the manufacturer has included a few extras that can enhance the gaming experience. The Game Bar deserves a special mention – a very nicely designed panel where you can quickly view and change the most important settings. From this interface, we have access to features like ALLM (Automatic Low Latency Mode) and frame synchronization, also known as VRR. The range of VRR is limited – working from 48 to 60 Hz – but the mere presence of this feature in such an affordable TV is impressive.

Additionally, it supports HGiG, which is a mode for HDR calibration for gaming. It sounds good, but from our testing experience, we know that for the UA7500, this option isn't very practical. The TV doesn't handle HDR very well, so ironically, we achieved better results with this mode turned off. This is another indication that the UA7500 is more of a screen for casual gamers who value simplicity and convenience, rather than for those seeking a full experience with the latest consoles.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
10 ms
1080p120
2160p60
12 ms
10 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
11 ms
10 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

The measured input lag when connected to the console was very good, with nothing to pick at. Both at FHD and 4K settings, we recorded delays of 12ms, and when adding the HDR format to the higher resolution, the lag dropped to 11ms. Each of these results should be considered more than satisfactory, as such a level allows for gameplay that is practically free of delays between controller, eye, and screen.

A delay of less than 10 ms is a result that more expensive models would envy. This makes games run exceptionally responsively, and every action on the controller is instantly visible on the screen. This is one of the strongest points of this television, especially for those who like to fire up the console from time to time.

Compatibility with PC

6/10

5.4/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
11ms
10ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

Connecting the Philips PUS8359 to a computer won't create major complications in terms of gaming. The latency is at a very good level, and working at 4K HDR settings was associated with an 11 ms input lag, which is an imperceptible value on the line from eye to screen to mouse. The tested TV also supports chroma 4:4:4, making work with text files convenient. This model does not support G-Sync and offers a refresh rate of 60 Hz, which can be a significant drawback for PC gamers. Therefore, the gaming rating is lower, although the device performs excellently in everyday office tasks.

LG UA7500 with a VA panel performs somewhat worse in this regard. The fonts aren't quite as crystal clear as in an IPS, and after extended use, you may notice a difference in readability. Chroma 4:4:4 support is, of course, available, so colours look correct, but overall it doesn't provide such a comfortable effect. In everyday use, the differences may not be significant, but for working with text and graphics, IPS proves to be a much better choice. The VA version is more suited as a versatile TV with PC connection options, rather than a fully-fledged office tool.

Viewing angles

3.4/10

3.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
65%
76%

The decrease in brightness at a 45-degree angle is 65%. This means that even a slight shift from the center of the screen can cause discomfort related to color degradation and image fading. This is rather a characteristic feature of the vast majority of VA panels that lack an angle coating.

The VA panel version presents a completely different approach. Straight on, the screen looks significantly better – the contrast is higher, blacks are deeper, and colours more saturated than with IPS. The problem begins when we move away from the axis. Just sitting slightly off to the side causes the colours to start losing their intensity, and the image becomes noticeably washed out. Blacks quickly turn grey, and the overall character is lost. Therefore, the UA7500 in the VA version works best in a typically "cinematic" setup – with a sofa or armchair positioned centrally in front of the screen. Then the television can provide a much better experience than IPS, but when watching with a larger group from various spots in the room, the limited viewing angles become its biggest drawback.

Daytime performance

4.7/10

4.6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Good
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

LG UA75006LA (VA): 302 cd/m2

Philips PUS8359 (VA): 318 cd/m2

The screen Philips PUS8359/12 has a satin finish. This type of panel finish allows for quite good performance in keeping light reflections in check and provides fairly comfortable viewing of the television during the day. It’s worth mentioning that the maximum brightness of the television in SDR content is about 320 nits, which is a reasonable result, especially since the brightness is maintained even at 100% screen white fill.

LG UA7500 with a VA panel performed slightly better when it comes to watching in a bright room. The applied coating handles reflections moderately well – it doesn’t completely eliminate them but softens them enough so that you can watch TV during the day without much discomfort. A plus is that the TV retains quite decent colour saturation, making the picture not look washed out even with incoming light. The brightness itself is also a bit higher than in the IPS variant, reaching around 300 nits, so the screen is somewhat more resistant to difficult lighting conditions. Of course, this level won’t provide comfort in very sunlit living rooms, but in typical home conditions, it holds its own.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
White LED
Software version during testing
V246.003.000.131
33.20.81
Image processor
nie wiem ale chyba tredriper

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Philips PUS8359 (VA)

LG UA75006LA (VA)

TV features

5.3/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    No
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    No
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) TV features
Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) TV features
Review Philips PUS8359 (VA) TV features
Review LG UA75006LA (VA) TV features
Review LG UA75006LA (VA) TV features
Review LG UA75006LA (VA) TV features
Review LG UA75006LA (VA) TV features

It’s hard not to mention the biggest differentiator of the manufacturer’s TVs first. We’re of course talking about the colorful Ambilight backlighting, which is placed on the back of the device and displays colours customised to what’s happening on the screen, often allowing for an even greater immersive experience. The operating system responsible for the TV’s functioning is Philips' proprietary system cleverly named TitanOs. It is definitely more closed off and limited in terms of app resources than is the case with this manufacturer’s TVs based on GoogleTv. Besides the lack of significant applications, its closed nature also reveals itself in another aspect. We won’t be able to do basic things like programming recordings or recording to USB. People using Apple devices may also feel disappointed by the absence of AirPlay, which allows for easy screen streaming. Fortunately, there is an option to connect a keyboard and mouse for easier navigation through the TV’s menu. It’s worth mentioning that there is the possibility of connecting headphones, but only wired ones. If we plug them in, we can also play audio through the TV’s speakers. It’s also worth adding that controlling the TV happens via IR, not Bluetooth, which is quite inconvenient these days.

In summary: TitanOs has quite a few “buts,” especially when we are aware users needing and using various streaming platforms. It’s rather an option for those limiting themselves to the so-called holy trinity, which is Netflix, YouTube, and CDA.

Smart Features: WebOS

A major plus for the LG UA7500 is the use of the webOS system. We gain access to a rich library of applications, support for AirPlay, screen mirroring, and many additional features that allow us to use the television in a really convenient way. It is easy to connect a smartphone, watch something from streaming services, or use music applications. However, the downside is that webOS remains quite a "heavy" system, and on the UA7500 it does not operate as smoothly as in more expensive models. The situation is not improved by the fact that the manufacturer has not equipped us here with a Magic remote with a cursor, which significantly speeds up operation. We get a regular infrared remote, lacking that "magic" wand. Of course, it can be purchased separately, but considering the cost, it often makes more sense to pay extra for a higher LG model that already comes with such a remote.

Classic Features

In more traditional use, the LG UA7500 also does not disappoint. The remote is equipped with a numeric keypad and a fair number of buttons, which will definitely be appreciated by users accustomed to older solutions. Additionally, there is the option to record programs to USB from the built-in tuners and a fairly readable EPG interface, which makes planning a viewing session easier. The downside remains the fact that the remote always requires pointing at the screen – but we believe that most more traditional users will be able to forgive this, treating it as a familiar and trusted tool.

Apps

6.7/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
No
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
No
28 Mpix
No
No
32 Mpix
No
No

The default media player built into Philips PUS8359/12 offers quite a wide range of capabilities, but it also has its limitations. It plays virtually all video formats, with the obvious exception of Dolby Vision and the less obvious .asf, which is not commonly encountered. However, the issue lies in the lack of the H.265 HEVC codec at high bitrate. When it comes to photos, the player performs adequately, but it lacks support for some popular resolutions and formats, such as HEIC, used on Apple devices. The player performs best with audio, where it can be praised. Unfortunately, due to system limitations, there is no possibility to expand its features, which means we are left with what the manufacturer has provided.

The multimedia player in the UA7500 works fine – movies or music start up without major issues and this should be sufficient for most people. However, one thing caught our attention: the television does not play all photo formats. In practice, this means that if we upload photos straight from a smartphone to a USB drive, some may simply not open. It’s a minor detail, but it’s worth keeping in mind. Fortunately, you can always use wireless image transmission to display photos on the screen in another way.

Sound

6.1/10

6/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The built-in audio system in the Philips PUS8359 consists of a basic connection of speakers 2x 10 W each. As you can probably guess, you can't expect too much from such a configuration. Nevertheless, if we don't exceed 50% of the maximum volume, it won't give us any negative thoughts. We definitely recommend connecting even cheaper soundbars. These, due to a range of codecs prepared by the manufacturer, will certainly work very well. It's worth noting the implementation of Dolby Atmos and DTS-HD Master Audio.

In terms of sound, the LG UA7500 doesn't surprise with powerful bass or maximum volume, but it performs surprisingly well. Our impression was that it fares better than most of the cheapest budget TVs and for everyday use, it really does the job quite nicely. It will be just right for news, programs, or series.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC