Philips PUS8209 vs Sharp GR8

Direct compare

PUS8209

GR8765E / GR8465E / GR8265E

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

6.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.4

    6.2

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.1

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    6.4

  • Gaming on console

    6.6

    7.8

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    4.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.4

    4.5

  • Utility functions

    5.0

    6.5

  • Apps

    7.0

    10.0

  • Sound quality

    5.0

    7.0

Advantages

  • High native contrast

  • Three-sided Ambilight system – unique backlighting for the wall behind the TV that enhances immersion while watching

  • Low input lag – around 13 ms

  • Has essential features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Support for Polish characters and subtitle customization – built-in player allows for changing the colour and size of the font

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS – wide range of supported audio codecs

  • VA matrix with decent contrast

  • 144 Hz refresh rate and two HDMI 2.1 ports – a great option for gamers

  • Support for VRR and ALLM, low input lag

  • Dolby Vision support

  • Google TV with a rich selection of apps, voice search in Polish, and an intuitive interface

  • Decent sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • Titan OS operating system – limited number of applications

  • Poor brightness (280 nits) – issues with viewing in bright conditions

  • Poor viewing angles – typical of VA panels,

  • Issues with font rendering

  • HDR brightness is lower than claimed by the manufacturer (around 360 nits instead of 500)

  • In PC mode, it does not support 4:4:4 chroma – text and fonts are therefore less readable

  • No USB recording and PiP function

  • No support for AirPlay – Apple device owners may feel disappointed

Our verdict

The Philips PUS8209 is a model that stands out primarily due to its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided backlighting behind the television dynamically adjusts to the image, adding an exceptional atmosphere while watching movies or gaming. This solution, for which Philips is renowned, makes a difference and could be a great choice for those looking for something more unique for everyday use. In terms of picture quality, the television performs quite well, especially in this price range. The VA panel provides solid contrast and decent black levels, which is particularly effective in the evenings in dimly lit rooms. Watching movies in such conditions is truly enjoyable, although the screen brightness (280 nits) leaves much to be desired – in bright rooms, the picture can look washed out, and HDR content does not impress. When it comes to gaming, the PUS8209 also has a few advantages. Support for VRR, ALLM, and a low input lag of 13 ms makes gameplay smooth and responsive. Of course, this is not hardware for advanced gamers, but for those who occasionally pick up a controller, it should suffice. The biggest downside is the operating system, Titan OS. Many popular apps are missing, and the interface doesn't always run as smoothly as one would like. The remote control, which requires pointing at the television, can be frustrating, especially in situations where quick access is expected. In summary: the Philips PUS8209 is a television that works well for basic applications. Ambilight adds uniqueness and enhances the atmosphere while watching. In everyday use or occasional gaming, it does the job, but its limitations – particularly in screen brightness and operating system – may be problematic for more demanding users. If we are looking for straightforward equipment with an unusual visual addition, this model is worth considering.

Sharp GR8 is a television created primarily for those who expect an exceptionally smooth image. It is essentially the successor to the FQ8 model, and it's clear that the manufacturer has heavily focused on the aspect of motion dynamics. 144 Hz makes a difference – and not just in games. Sports broadcasts can also look fantastic, without those annoying blurring or "choppiness" that can take the joy out of watching. In terms of image quality, Sharp opted for a VA panel. While it doesn't feature local dimming, you can still count on pleasant contrast. Additionally, there's Dolby Vision, which gives evening movie screenings depth – even if the TV doesn't reach the brightness claimed by the manufacturer. It must be said that when the lights in the room are dimmed, the overall look is really pleasing to the eye. One of the biggest advantages of the GR8 is Google TV. We have access to a full range of applications, voice search in Polish, and a simple, intuitive interface. This means we don't have to limit ourselves to the standard TV functions, as there is always the option to install additional programs and tailor the system to our own needs. Of course, a few things could have been polished. The declared HDR brightness is higher on paper than in reality, which may leave the most discerning cinema enthusiasts feeling unsatisfied. Moreover, a few useful features known from other models are missing: there’s no USB recording or PiP functionality, and Apple device owners will be disappointed by the lack of AirPlay. Nevertheless, this is a television mainly aimed at those who value smooth visuals and high refresh rates. If we primarily care about dynamic gameplay and good support for games, while wanting to quietly enjoy a film in the evenings with pleasing quality, the Sharp GR8 should meet those expectations.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
2 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps

Where to buy

No links

No links

Contrast and black detail

6.6/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,050:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

10,200:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

9,050:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,200:1

Review Sharp GR8 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,300:1

Review Sharp GR8 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,800:1

Review Sharp GR8 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,600:1

Review Sharp GR8 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,650:1

Review Sharp GR8 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,700:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Philips PUS8209 positively surprised us in terms of contrast, which is quite solid for its price class. Thanks to the use of a VA panel, it managed to achieve a contrast ratio of 8000:1, which is considered a very good result in this price category. In tests using scenes from the film Oblivion, the television performed well, offering visible light separation. Three independent light sources in the test scene were reproduced without major issues. Similarly, in the case of the film Sicario 2, the black levels, while not perfect, present reasonably well, allowing for the distinction of details in the darker areas of the image. The lack of local dimming technology is noticeable, however, the manufacturer has implemented a "global dimming" feature. This mechanism allows the television to automatically darken or brighten the entire screen depending on the content, which somewhat improves the perception of contrast. Philips PUS8209 offers solid contrast and decent results in tests. Although it lacks the precision of local dimming, its capabilities at this price point are satisfactory and will please most users.

Sharp GR8 uses a VA panel, which can provide quite decent contrast. In tested movie scenes, for example in “Arrival,” the television showed that it can achieve really good results. A contrast ratio of 6600:1 is a figure that can be considered solid in this price segment. However, it should be noted that the television is not equipped with local dimming technology. This is quite obvious, considering the class of the equipment. Despite this, Sharp GR8 performs well with the separation of bright and dark elements, which definitely deserves recognition. However, it's important to remember that televisions without local dimming have their limitations. In very dark conditions, such as during a viewing in a completely dark room, black may take on shades of navy instead of appearing deep and pitch black. Overall, Sharp GR8 offers quite solid contrast that should satisfy most users.

HDR effect quality

3.7/10

4.8/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.4%, Bt.2020: 67.0%
DCI P3: 95.2%, Bt.2020: 74.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

231 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

268 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

278 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

274 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

281 nit

Review Sharp GR8 Brightness measurement

Result

305 nit

Review Sharp GR8 Brightness measurement

Result

332 nit

Review Sharp GR8 Brightness measurement

Result

369 nit

Review Sharp GR8 Brightness measurement

Result

365 nit

Review Sharp GR8 Brightness measurement

Result

367 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

HDR luminance chart:

Sharp GR8

Philips PUS8209

Unfortunately, this is where the problems start. A maximum brightness of 280 nits is definitely too low to experience the true effect of HDR. In practice, the image resembles standard SDR more, so it's hard to talk about deeper visual experiences. On the plus side, the colour gamut coverage is 91.4% DCI-P3, which will be sufficient for most films. It's also worth noting that the image is stable and there are no issues with sudden brightness or colour changes. Overall, HDR on this television is more of a formality than an actual added value. If we're looking for genuine HDR emotions, this model may not meet expectations.

Sharp GR8 in its promotional materials boasts of "very high brightness" at a level of 500 nits. Unfortunately, our tests showed that reality is somewhat different – the average luminance we were able to achieve was around 360 nits. This is rather an average result, especially in the context of the manufacturer's claims. Such brightness does not allow for a full enjoyment of HDR effects. The image is a bit sharper than in standard SDR, but it's hard to talk about true vibrancy and depth of bright elements here. However, the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette at 95% deserves praise. This is the result of applying an additional PFS coating, known from QLED technology. As a result, colours are vibrant and have a pleasant, natural tone, which partially compensates for the shortcomings in brightness.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

5.4/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

Philips PUS8209 offers many picture modes, but the best of them, without a doubt, is the Filmmaker mode. Despite its proud name, it has its distinct problems. For HD content, the white balance is characterised by a strong dominance of red, causing the image to be significantly warmer than it should be in reality. The brightness characteristic (gamma), although correct in mid-tones, has serious issues at the beginning and end of the graph. Drops in shadows result in a loss of detail in dark areas, and spikes in bright areas make some elements look unnatural.

For high-quality content in 4K HDR, the situation reverses. In this case, blue dominates, leading to an artificial image boost effect, reminiscent of unnatural retail settings. Such an image looks unappealing and does not align with the creators' intentions. An additional problem is the EOTF curve, responsible for brightness in HDR materials. It deviates significantly from the reference graph, causing the image to appear too dark, stripping depth and detail from HDR content.

Against this backdrop, the errors in the Color Checker test and deviations in colour palette reproduction are exceptionally large, which further negatively affects the overall image quality. The Filmmaker mode, while the best among those available, requires substantial corrections to truly convey the full vision of the director.

At the beginning, it's worth noting that colour reproduction tests are always conducted in the best factory picture mode. In the case of Sharp GR8, this is the “Film” mode. When it comes to white balance, which affects how we perceive colours on the screen, in SDR mode the strong dominance of blue immediately stands out. This results in an unnatural cooling of the image – blue elements take on a purple hue, and skin tones appear to have a pink tint, which we can see in the comparative photo from the film STAR WARS. During the Color Checker test, it was clearly visible how the colour samples deviated from the standard values, confirming significant errors in colour reproduction. The gamma was also not ideal – it caused excessive brightening of the entire image, causing the scene to lose depth and proper tonal transitions.

In the 4K HDR mode, the situation looks much better. The dominance of blue is much less noticeable, although there are minor issues with the blending of red and blue. This makes some shades look slightly unnatural. The EOTF curve, which is responsible for image brightness in 4K HDR content, showed another problem – the TV tends to excessively darken the image across the entire surface of the screen.

To summarise, the “Film” mode in Sharp GR8 would require some adjustments in order to fully utilise the potential of this television. Fortunately, we took care of this and proceeded with calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.3/10

8/10

After calibration, the white balance for HD and 4K content has significantly improved. While we haven't achieved a perfectly flat characteristic, the result is definitely better than before. The image on the television no longer appears either artificially warm or overly cold, which significantly enhances the naturalness of the displayed content. The brightness characteristic (gamma) has also been adjusted – the most significant issues at the beginning and end of the graph have been mitigated. The EOTF curve, which is responsible for brightness in 4K HDR materials, has been stabilised, eliminating problems with excessive dimming of the image. In the colour palette test, some imperfections can still be seen due to the average coverage of the wide colour gamut, which is a limitation of the hardware itself. Nevertheless, the final result is clearly better than pre-calibration – the image looks more natural and approaches the expectations for Filmmaker mode.

Sharp GR8 is one of those televisions that really gains a second life after proper calibration. Both in HD and 4K content, the white balance performs very well, especially considering this model's price segment. The picture becomes significantly closer to what the director intended to show – colours appear natural, and skin tones gain the right depth and warmth. The brightness characteristics also leave a very positive impression. Both the gamma and the EOTF curve demonstrate really solid values. While slight imperfections can be noticed, they are subtle enough that it's difficult to see them during everyday viewing. In summary, calibration allows Sharp GR8 to show its best face, offering a picture that is not only pleasant to the eye but also faithfully conveys the creators' intentions.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

8/10

Philips PUS8209 presents a decent gradation in bright scenes, where the tonal transitions are smooth enough not to be jarring. Unfortunately, in darker scenes, such as red water, the TV struggles noticeably. Issues with blending shades and a lack of precision in reproducing subtle colour differences are very apparent here.

When it comes to the fluidity of tonal transitions in high-quality materials such as 4K, Sharp GR8 performs really well. Colour gradients are smooth, and transitions between shades are natural and free from visible artifacts. The television has no issues reproducing subtle differences in colours, even in demanding scenes. Only the most discerning users, who closely examine the image, may notice slight imperfections in the darkest shades. For most viewers, the quality of tonal transitions in the Sharp GR8 will be more than satisfactory and will not negatively affect the perception of the image.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

5.5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

The television offers a “Distortion Reduction” feature that effectively improves the gradation of tonal transitions, particularly when set to the minimum level. Unfortunately, this comes at a cost – the feature also smooths out details like material textures. On the plus side, it’s worth noting that the operation of this option does not negatively affect the film grain, which remains intact.

As for image scaling (upscaling), the television generates a plastic, soft image that generally looks pleasant. However, in the background, issues with aliasing of certain elements, such as branches or small details, can sometimes be noticed, which may decrease the quality of the reception. Despite these minor imperfections, the overall experience of scaling is satisfactory.

Sharp GR8 is equipped with a feature called "10-bit colour reproduction," which theoretically should improve the smoothness of tonal transitions. In practice… well, the effect is surprising, but not in a very positive way. Even at the highest settings, it’s hard to notice any impact on the actual tonal transitions. Instead, the feature surprisingly smooths out things it shouldn’t - walls, shirts, or other flat surfaces look almost as if they have been ironed. In the test, we had to note that there is simply no actual impact on tonal transitions.

When it comes to image scaling, Sharp GR8 performs significantly better. The television can give the image a plastic, smooth characteristic, making even lower resolution content look quite good. Of course, with more demanding details, such as thin branches of trees in the background, you can see slight jaggedness, but it’s not something that would significantly affect the viewing comfort.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.8/10

7.4/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Nie
Nie
BFI function 120Hz
Nie
Nie
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

The 60 Hz panel in the Philips PUS8209 is mainly suited for watching movies, but here you can also feel a certain shortcoming. The television does not offer any motion smoothing that would allow you to adjust the fluidity of the picture to individual preferences, which for some users may be disappointing.

This is where Sharp GR8 has the opportunity to stand out against the competition in its price segment. The television is equipped with a 144 Hz refresh rate panel, which is an impressive result, especially if we plan to use it for dynamic content such as action films, sports broadcasts, or video games. Additionally, the manufacturer has included a motion smoothing feature, commonly known as a 'smoother'. The user has three levels of adjustment available, allowing them to tailor the effect to their personal preferences – from subtle smoothing to a more aggressive intervention in the fluidity of the image. It's a nice addition, particularly for those who mainly watch films and care about smooth, cinematic sequences without annoying judders or stuttering.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

7.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    No

Philips PUS8209 offers basic features useful for gamers, such as variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic low latency mode (ALLM), and Game Bar, which makes managing settings easier.

Unfortunately, due to the 60 Hz panel, the TV will not meet the expectations of more demanding gamers who are looking for higher fluidity and precision of image. Additionally, this model does not support any HDR mode dedicated to gaming, such as HGiG or Dolby Vision, which further limits its capabilities in this regard.

If the television has a 144 Hz panel and two full HDMI 2.1 ports, it’s clear it was designed with gamers in mind. The Sharp GR8 offers exactly that – high refresh rates and the right connections to get the most out of modern consoles and PCs. It also features ALLM, which automatically switches the TV to low latency mode, and VRR, ensuring the picture doesn’t stutter even in more demanding moments. In practice, everything works as it should, and it's difficult to find fault. However, it’s not without its shortcomings. There’s a lack of support for HGiG, which better adjusts HDR for games, as well as Game Bar, which makes it easier to quickly adjust settings without leaving the game. Despite these drawbacks, the Sharp GR8 is a really solid option for gamers.

Input lag

10/10

9.7/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
18 ms
1080p120
9 ms
2160p60
13 ms
18 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
16 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
17 ms
2160p120 DV
9 ms

Input lag in the Philips PUS8209 is one of its strongest points. With a value of around 13 ms, the TV provides a very quick response time, which should satisfy most gamers, both casual and more advanced. Such a result allows for comfortable gameplay even in dynamic games.

Sharp GR8 performs really well in terms of delays. With a refresh rate of 120 Hz, the input lag is only 9 ms, and at 60 Hz – about 18 ms. These values are practically imperceptible even for the most demanding gamers, where every millisecond counts. Importantly, the Dolby Vision mode also works responsively, which is not a standard in TVs within this price range. This is definitely a big plus for those who want to enjoy not only smoothness but also better HDR effects while gaming.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

4/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
13ms
18ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

On paper, collaboration with a PC seems promising, particularly due to support for 4:4:4 chroma, which should ensure good font readability and detail reproduction. In practice, however, the television has significant issues with displaying text, especially on dark backgrounds, where the so-called pixelation is clearly visible, negatively impacting work comfort.

Additionally, the lack of support for technologies like G-Sync means that gaming smoothness when connected to a PC leaves much to be desired, making this model less attractive for users looking for a television for gaming on a computer.

Sharp GR8 performs quite well as a screen for PC gaming. With a refresh rate of 144 Hz, low input lag, and support for G-Sync and FreeSync technologies, it's a set that guarantees smooth and responsive gameplay. Games look dynamic, and the image remains stable even in the most demanding moments. However, a problem arises when it's time to work with text. The television does not support chroma 4:4:4, which means fonts are blurred and difficult to read. Longer work with documents or browsing websites can become simply tiring on the eyes.

Sharp GR8 is a great choice for PC gamers, but rather poor for office work. If we plan to use this television mainly for gaming, we should be satisfied. However, if we think of it as a monitor for everyday work, it's better to look for another solution.

Viewing angles

2.1/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
87%
75%

The viewing angles on the Philips PUS8209 are poor, which is typical for a VA panel. When watched at an angle, the brightness of the image drops significantly, and the colours lose their depth, which can greatly affect viewing comfort, especially in larger groups or in an unusual setup of the television in relation to the viewer.

When it comes to viewing angles, Sharp GR8 doesn't surprise – and it's hard to blame it, considering the use of a VA panel. When watching from a more significant angle, the image loses quality, colours become washed out, and contrast noticeably drops. Additional coatings that widen viewing angles could improve this aspect, but that's a solution we typically find in more expensive LCD TV models. If we plan to watch television mainly straight on, there won't be much of a problem. However, in the case of a larger number of viewers sitting at different angles, it's worth being aware of this limitation.

TV efficiency during daytime

4.4/10

4.5/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Average
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Sharp GR8: 329 cd/m2

Philips PUS8209: 277 cd/m2

The Philips PUS8209 features a satin screen coating that only moderately suppresses reflections, which may be inadequate in bright room lighting. However, the biggest issue is the low brightness at just 280 nits. In practice, this means that watching content during the day, especially in strong sunlight, can be a challenge as the picture appears too dark to provide comfortable viewing.

Sharp GR8 has a satin finish display that performs average with reflections. Bright surrounding elements, such as windows or lamps, quite clearly reflect on the screen and can be distracting while viewing. The brightness level of 330 cd/m² in SDR content is also unimpressive. As a result, the television is best suited for rooms where not too much natural light comes in. So, it can be said that the GR8 holds up during the day, but it is certainly not equipment made for brightly lit living rooms. If we mainly watch in the evenings or in controlled lighting, it won’t be a major issue.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
PFS LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.147.081
v1.19 SHARP-FV1
Image processor
mt5889 3gb ram

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity:

TV features

5/10

6.5/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    Google TV
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • AirPlay
    No
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    No
    Yes
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    No
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Infrared
    RF
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes

Philips PUS8209 uses the Titan OS operating system, which, while simple to use, remains limited in terms of functionality. The available number of applications is small compared to more developed ecosystems like Google TV, which may be disappointing for users accustomed to broader capabilities. Additionally, the lack of support for AirPlay restricts compatibility with Apple devices, reducing the flexibility of the television in streaming content. The remote, though interesting, requires aiming at the screen, which may not appeal to everyone.

The absence of more advanced features such as PiP (Picture-in-Picture) or program recording further limits the device's capabilities in everyday use.

Philips PUS8209 is a television that catches attention with its interesting feature of a three-sided Ambilight system, which is a dynamic backlighting of the wall behind the television that adjusts its colours and intensity to the content displayed on the screen. This effect creates the impression of greater image depth and enhances immersion, especially in darkened rooms. Unfortunately, its potential is limited by the Titan OS operating system, which leaves much to be desired. The limited number of applications and the lack of support for popular features such as AirPlay can be a significant drawback for more demanding users. While Ambilight distinguishes this model from the competition, shortcomings in the operating system significantly affect the overall functionality of the television.

Google TV is definitely the biggest advantage of Sharpa GR8. This system is a true multimedia powerhouse – it includes practically all popular streaming apps, such as Netflix, HBO Max, and Disney+. Voice search works in Polish and, importantly, is really responsive. We can tell the TV what we want to watch, and it quickly finds the right content. Plus, the interface is clear and intuitive, so even people who aren't keen on technological innovations can manage without any problem. In short, Google TV gets the job done.

Unfortunately, when it comes to more classic functions, the GR8 is rather average. There are no options for USB recording or PiP (picture in picture) functionality. Moreover, although the TV supports Bluetooth connectivity, iPhone users may feel disappointed as there is no support for AirPlay.

The remote included is simple but well thought out. It has a solar panel on the front, allowing it to be charged by light, and the additional charging port means we don’t have to worry about changing batteries. Also, it’s a plus that the remote doesn’t require aiming at the screen – it works regardless of which way it’s pointed.

Playing files from USB

8/10

9.1/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the Philips PUS8209 performs well in everyday use. It smoothly handles Polish characters in subtitles and allows for adjustments to the colour and size of the font, which significantly enhances the comfort of using this feature. More demanding users may notice some limitations in the supported file formats, however, for most applications in everyday use, this player should be fully sufficient.

Sharp GR8 handles multimedia playback from USB really well. It supports practically all popular audio and video formats, so we don’t have to worry about any files not playing.

However, the built-in player has its limitations – for instance, we won’t find the option to change the font colour in subtitles here. Fortunately, the Google TV system allows us to bypass this issue. All you need to do is download an alternative media playback app from the Google Play Store that offers more advanced configuration options.

Apps

7/10

10/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
OK
Kodi

Sound

5/10

7/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    5/10
    7/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    Yes
    Yes

The sound on the Philips PUS8209 can be described as average, typical for televisions in this price range. The 2x10 W speakers do not offer exceptional quality or depth; however, they are sufficient for everyday TV watching. On the plus side, it should be noted that there is a wide range of supported audio codecs, such as Dolby Atmos and DTS, which can significantly enhance audio quality when paired with external sound systems, like soundbars or home theatre setups.

Sharp GR8 pleasantly surprises with its sound quality. Although it comes with a standard set of speakers, you can hear the influence of collaboration with Harman/Kardon. The sound is clear, dialogue is well-highlighted, and the overall sound profile is pleasant to the ear. It's not at the level of flagship models with advanced audio systems, but for this price segment – it's really good.

Unfortunately, Sharp has chosen to remove the built-in soundbar that we saw in the previously reviewed model Sharp FQ8. It's a shame because this solution significantly enhanced the sound quality and gave the TV an edge over the competition.