Philips PUS8209 vs LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

Direct compare

PUS8209

QNED85A / QNED86A / QNED87A / A6A / A6B / A6C

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”100”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

7.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.4

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.1

    6.2

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    7.2

  • Gaming on console

    6.6

    8.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    8.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.4

    5.8

  • Utility functions

    4.7

    8.4

  • Apps

    6.2

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    5.0

    6.0

Advantages

  • High native contrast

  • Three-sided Ambilight system – unique backlighting for the wall behind the TV that enhances immersion while watching

  • Low input lag – around 13 ms

  • Has essential features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Support for Polish characters and subtitle customization – built-in player allows for changing the colour and size of the font

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS – wide range of supported audio codecs

  • 120 Hz panel, great for sports and gaming

  • Very low input lag

  • Excellent for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG etc.)

  • Full set of HDMI 2.1 ports

  • Good compatibility with PC (great font readability)

  • Bright picture (about 700 nits in HDR), suitable for moderately bright rooms

  • Good viewing angles (IPS)

  • Support for Dolby Vision

  • User-friendly webOS operating system with Magic Remote control featuring voice assistant

  • Ability to record programs to USB

Disadvantages

No like
  • Titan OS operating system – limited number of applications

  • Poor brightness (280 nits) – issues with viewing in bright conditions

  • Poor viewing angles – typical of VA panels,

  • Issues with font rendering

  • Very poor black levels and contrast due to the IPS panel

  • Lack of the advertised 144 Hz in PC mode

  • Aggressive “light stripes” when local dimming is turned on (edge local dimming ruins evening movie sessions)

  • Confusion in model names and versions – even TVs with the same name in different stores can have different stands (central or two legs) or frame colours, which can be quite misleading when making a purchase.

Our verdict

The Philips PUS8209 is a model that stands out primarily due to its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided backlighting behind the television dynamically adjusts to the image, adding an exceptional atmosphere while watching movies or gaming. This solution, for which Philips is renowned, makes a difference and could be a great choice for those looking for something more unique for everyday use. In terms of picture quality, the television performs quite well, especially in this price range. The VA panel provides solid contrast and decent black levels, which is particularly effective in the evenings in dimly lit rooms. Watching movies in such conditions is truly enjoyable, although the screen brightness (280 nits) leaves much to be desired – in bright rooms, the picture can look washed out, and HDR content does not impress. When it comes to gaming, the PUS8209 also has a few advantages. Support for VRR, ALLM, and a low input lag of 13 ms makes gameplay smooth and responsive. Of course, this is not hardware for advanced gamers, but for those who occasionally pick up a controller, it should suffice. The biggest downside is the operating system, Titan OS. Many popular apps are missing, and the interface doesn't always run as smoothly as one would like. The remote control, which requires pointing at the television, can be frustrating, especially in situations where quick access is expected. In summary: the Philips PUS8209 is a television that works well for basic applications. Ambilight adds uniqueness and enhances the atmosphere while watching. In everyday use or occasional gaming, it does the job, but its limitations – particularly in screen brightness and operating system – may be problematic for more demanding users. If we are looking for straightforward equipment with an unusual visual addition, this model is worth considering.

QNED86A6A is a television that really does a great job in its price class when it comes to sports, gaming, and everyday TV viewing. The 120 Hz panel makes the image smooth, and the motion sharp, which will be appreciated by both fans and gamers. Additionally, it has low input lag along with a full suite of gaming features such as HGiG, VRR, and ALLM. The television works just as well with a computer as it does with a console, so in the office or on a desk in the 43” version, it will serve excellently as a work monitor. Another strong point is the webOS system. It’s a fast, stable, and app-rich operating system that paired with the Magic Remote provides very convenient operation. The new version of the remote is slimmer and fits better in the hand, and the on-screen cursor is a feature that many competitors lack. On top of that, there are classic features – USB recording, Bluetooth for headphones, and a full set of HDMI 2.1 with eARC and Dolby Atmos support. This makes the televisions from the QNED85 series some of the most "multimedia" televisions in their class. But there’s no point in sugar-coating it; this model also has some significant drawbacks. Its biggest disadvantage is undoubtedly the contrast, or rather the lack thereof. The IPS panel combined with the edge-lit “mini-LED” is just a very bad idea. The screen simply isn’t suitable for watching movies in a dark living room. Blacks are a greyish-blue, and local dimming can create strips of light reminiscent of lasers, which effectively ruins the viewing experience. For home cinema, it’s not a choice that can be recommended with full conviction. The second issue may not be directly related to the television itself but rather its sales. It concerns chaos in the naming conventions and differences in derivative versions. The same model, even with the same designation, can have a different colour frame or stand depending on the store. This can really be frustrating for the buyer and evoke a sense of confusion. To summarise briefly: LG QNED86A6A is a great television for sports, gaming, and everyday TV, with a convenient system and high functionality. But if you’re looking for a screen strictly for movies or series and require deep blacks, it’s better to look towards televisions that can actually be confidently referred to as Mini-LEDs.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
BuildQuality-Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Stand type
stand-type-Graphite
stand-type-Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Height adjustment
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.6/10

3.7/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 6 (1 x 6)

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,050:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

10,200:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

9,050:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,200:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,050:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,750:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,800:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,850:1

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Contrast and black detail

Result

1,350:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Philips PUS8209 positively surprised us in terms of contrast, which is quite solid for its price class. Thanks to the use of a VA panel, it managed to achieve a contrast ratio of 8000:1, which is considered a very good result in this price category. In tests using scenes from the film Oblivion, the television performed well, offering visible light separation. Three independent light sources in the test scene were reproduced without major issues. Similarly, in the case of the film Sicario 2, the black levels, while not perfect, present reasonably well, allowing for the distinction of details in the darker areas of the image. The lack of local dimming technology is noticeable, however, the manufacturer has implemented a "global dimming" feature. This mechanism allows the television to automatically darken or brighten the entire screen depending on the content, which somewhat improves the perception of contrast. Philips PUS8209 offers solid contrast and decent results in tests. Although it lacks the precision of local dimming, its capabilities at this price point are satisfactory and will please most users.

While the manufacturer describes the QNED86A as a Mini-LED television, there’s no sign of the multi-zone local dimming system known from pricier models. In practice, we have a classic edge lighting system, which only allows for dimming horizontal strips of the screen from top to bottom. Combined with a low-contrast IPS/ADS panel, the effect is simply poor. If we choose to leave local dimming on, a problem arises - the television can illuminate selected areas in such a way that it looks like “flying lasers” crossing the screen. This is very distracting and in such conditions, it’s hard to talk about truly cinematic experiences. Therefore, in our opinion, it's better to turn this function off. However, one must reckon with the fact that the contrast then drops to around 1500:1, but at least the image doesn’t irritate with artificial flashes.

HDR effect quality

3.8/10

6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.4%, Bt.2020: 67.0%
DCI P3: 95.4%, Bt.2020: 73.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

231 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

268 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

278 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

274 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

281 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

524 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

690 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

512 nit

Review LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A Brightness measurement

Result

500 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

HDR luminance chart:

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A

HDR luminance

Philips PUS8209

HDR luminance

Unfortunately, this is where the problems start. A maximum brightness of 280 nits is definitely too low to experience the true effect of HDR. In practice, the image resembles standard SDR more, so it's hard to talk about deeper visual experiences. On the plus side, the colour gamut coverage is 91.4% DCI-P3, which will be sufficient for most films. It's also worth noting that the image is stable and there are no issues with sudden brightness or colour changes. Overall, HDR on this television is more of a formality than an actual added value. If we're looking for genuine HDR emotions, this model may not meet expectations.

Against the backdrop of contrast and black, the brightness of the QNED86A and the overall HDR effect fare much better. It's a television that can achieve around 700 nits under the best conditions, so in terms of luminance alone, there’s nothing to be ashamed of. As a result, scenes with strong lights, explosions, flashes, or bright parts of the landscape – look clear and can make an impression. Interestingly, even in tougher moments with small, contrasting elements on the screen, the television does well with backlighting and details are quite visible. The problem arises when there are many dark tones. The lack of effective local dimming means that black virtually disappears, and instead, we get a grey glow spreading across the entire screen. This kills the depth effect and causes the image to appear flat, as if it lacks cinematic character. In bright animations or family films with vibrant colours, this won't be an issue, as the colours and bright light dominate. But in horror films or productions set in darkness, these limitations are strongly felt. As a consolation, it’s worth noting that the QNED86A is essentially a QLED television with an LED PFS filter, which gives it very good coverage of wide colour gamuts. Both the DCI-P3 palette and the wider BT.2020 perform solidly here. This means that colours in HDR films are saturated, juicy, and have the right depth – even if the black itself is disappointing, the colours can save the viewing experience and make the image look appealing.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

5.6/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

Philips PUS8209 offers many picture modes, but the best of them, without a doubt, is the Filmmaker mode. Despite its proud name, it has its distinct problems. For HD content, the white balance is characterised by a strong dominance of red, causing the image to be significantly warmer than it should be in reality. The brightness characteristic (gamma), although correct in mid-tones, has serious issues at the beginning and end of the graph. Drops in shadows result in a loss of detail in dark areas, and spikes in bright areas make some elements look unnatural.

For high-quality content in 4K HDR, the situation reverses. In this case, blue dominates, leading to an artificial image boost effect, reminiscent of unnatural retail settings. Such an image looks unappealing and does not align with the creators' intentions. An additional problem is the EOTF curve, responsible for brightness in HDR materials. It deviates significantly from the reference graph, causing the image to appear too dark, stripping depth and detail from HDR content.

Against this backdrop, the errors in the Color Checker test and deviations in colour palette reproduction are exceptionally large, which further negatively affects the overall image quality. The Filmmaker mode, while the best among those available, requires substantial corrections to truly convey the full vision of the director.

We primarily tested the QNED86A in Filmmaker mode, which is designed to provide the most faithful picture. Unfortunately, right out of the box, there were quite a few shortcomings. The most glaring issue was the poorly calibrated white balance – there was a lack of blue, which caused the overall image to take on a slightly yellowish, and sometimes even an orange hue. An even bigger problem was the way the television manages brightness. Due to its technical limitations – that is, local dimming functioning only along the edges of the screen – the QNED86A has a tendency to oversaturate entire scenes. This is where the flattening of the image that we mentioned earlier comes from. Instead of clear depth and contrast, we get something akin to "boosted brightness," which, in the long run, can strain the eyes.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.3/10

7.6/10

After calibration, the white balance for HD and 4K content has significantly improved. While we haven't achieved a perfectly flat characteristic, the result is definitely better than before. The image on the television no longer appears either artificially warm or overly cold, which significantly enhances the naturalness of the displayed content. The brightness characteristic (gamma) has also been adjusted – the most significant issues at the beginning and end of the graph have been mitigated. The EOTF curve, which is responsible for brightness in 4K HDR materials, has been stabilised, eliminating problems with excessive dimming of the image. In the colour palette test, some imperfections can still be seen due to the average coverage of the wide colour gamut, which is a limitation of the hardware itself. Nevertheless, the final result is clearly better than pre-calibration – the image looks more natural and approaches the expectations for Filmmaker mode.

What was saved in the QNED86A6A is undoubtedly the colours. After calibration, the white balance was set with great precision, ensuring that deviations on the Colour Checker palette mostly did not exceed the visibility threshold for the human eye. In other words – the colours finally looked natural, without strange yellow or orange tones that had previously marred the perception. Unfortunately, even the best calibration cannot overcome structural limitations. The already mentioned very modest number of local dimming zones and their unfortunate placement meant that the analysis of the EOTF curve in films still showed noticeable scene over-exposures. The image tended to flatten, lacking cinematic depth. Fortunately, this effect is not as visible in older productions or in SDR content. There, calibration really does its job and allows the QNED to be tamed so the image can be pleasing. However, the specifics of this construction – especially the contrast issues – cannot be completely bypassed.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

8.9/10

Philips PUS8209 presents a decent gradation in bright scenes, where the tonal transitions are smooth enough not to be jarring. Unfortunately, in darker scenes, such as red water, the TV struggles noticeably. Issues with blending shades and a lack of precision in reproducing subtle colour differences are very apparent here.

Colour gradation is one of the strong points of the QNED86A. In everyday viewing, the picture looks really smooth, without noticeable "steps" or sudden transitions between colours. The TV handles colour blending quite naturally, so with most content, it’s hard to spot any issues with gradation. Any imperfections only appear in extreme conditions – for example, in the darkest parts of films, where even much more expensive TVs can have problems. There, you might notice slight banding or characteristic stripes, but these are marginal situations that shouldn’t be a bother during regular use. Overall, the QNED86A performs well in this category and has nothing to be ashamed of compared to the competition.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

7.8/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

The television offers a “Distortion Reduction” feature that effectively improves the gradation of tonal transitions, particularly when set to the minimum level. Unfortunately, this comes at a cost – the feature also smooths out details like material textures. On the plus side, it’s worth noting that the operation of this option does not negatively affect the film grain, which remains intact.

As for image scaling (upscaling), the television generates a plastic, soft image that generally looks pleasant. However, in the background, issues with aliasing of certain elements, such as branches or small details, can sometimes be noticed, which may decrease the quality of the reception. Despite these minor imperfections, the overall experience of scaling is satisfactory.

If someone is worried about potential "steps" when blending colours, the QNED86A has a simple solution for that. Just turn on the feature called Smooth Gradation and set it to the medium level. Then the TV really smooths out all those unwanted transitions – especially in older productions – and it does so in a way that the film grain doesn’t disappear, nor do any strange artefacts appear. In other words, you can use it without any worries.

The upscaling itself also turns out quite well. Of course, there are no miracles here – with poorer quality sources, you can notice characteristic jagged edges. Fortunately, there is a sharpness slider in the menu, and if someone prefers a more "soft" image, it can be quickly adjusted to their own taste.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.8/10

7.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
120Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
No
Yes, 240Hz (double contours)
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
62%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

The 60 Hz panel in the Philips PUS8209 is mainly suited for watching movies, but here you can also feel a certain shortcoming. The television does not offer any motion smoothing that would allow you to adjust the fluidity of the picture to individual preferences, which for some users may be disappointing.

QNED86A has been equipped with a 120 Hz refresh rate panel, so right from the start, it can be said to be suitable for both sports and gaming. And indeed it is – the picture looks smooth, and motion blur isn’t too much of an issue. IPS panels have always had a bit of a problem with this, and here too you can sometimes notice slight blurring, especially in very dynamic scenes, but it’s not something that ruins watching a match or a fast-paced game. For cinema and sports fans, LG has included the traditional TruMotion smoothing feature. In the menu, we have two sliders – one for movies (De-Judder), and the other for sports (De-Blur). The first adds missing frames and allows you to adjust the character of motion – from raw, cinematic to a more fluid, “theatrical” feel. The second improves sharpness during dynamic actions, so it’s worth turning it up a bit if you watch a lot of sports.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 120Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Philips PUS8209 offers basic features useful for gamers, such as variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic low latency mode (ALLM), and Game Bar, which makes managing settings easier.

Unfortunately, due to the 60 Hz panel, the TV will not meet the expectations of more demanding gamers who are looking for higher fluidity and precision of image. Additionally, this model does not support any HDR mode dedicated to gaming, such as HGiG or Dolby Vision, which further limits its capabilities in this regard.

When it comes to gaming, the LG QNED86A6A is a complete tool. It features four HDMI 2.1 ports with a full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s, which means that whether you connect a PlayStation 5, an Xbox Series X, or a powerful PC – everything will work in full 4K at 120 Hz with support for all functions. This is a significant advantage, as some competitors still only feature two such ports, which can be troublesome when dealing with multiple devices. It also includes VRR, or variable refresh rate, which eliminates screen tearing, and ALLM, which automatically activates game mode when the console powers on. Dolby Vision Gaming is included as well, alongside proper implementation of the HGiG format, so titles that support these formats look livelier and more detailed. Additionally, there's the Game Optimizer – a kind of control centre for gamers. From this interface, you can view image parameters in real time, quickly switch modes, activate additional features, or adjust picture settings to your own preferences. The LG QNED86A6A has basically everything you would expect from a modern gaming television.

Input lag

10/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
15 ms
1080p120
6 ms
2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
14 ms
2160p120
6 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
15 ms
2160p120 DV
6 ms

Input lag in the Philips PUS8209 is one of its strongest points. With a value of around 13 ms, the TV provides a very quick response time, which should satisfy most gamers, both casual and more advanced. Such a result allows for comfortable gameplay even in dynamic games.

There’s really nothing to complain about here. The QNED86A6A achieves excellent results – around 5 ms with 120 Hz content and about 15 ms with 60 Hz. These values will comfortably satisfy both console gamers and those who connect a PC to the TV. The response to movements is instantaneous, so you can forget about delays between the image and the action on the pad.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

8/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
13ms
6ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
120Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

On paper, collaboration with a PC seems promising, particularly due to support for 4:4:4 chroma, which should ensure good font readability and detail reproduction. In practice, however, the television has significant issues with displaying text, especially on dark backgrounds, where the so-called pixelation is clearly visible, negatively impacting work comfort.

Additionally, the lack of support for technologies like G-Sync means that gaming smoothness when connected to a PC leaves much to be desired, making this model less attractive for users looking for a television for gaming on a computer.

LG QNED86A, with its IPS panel, full RGB subpixel layout, and proper implementation of chroma 4:4:4, makes text look fantastic on the QNED86A6A. The text is sharp, clear, and readable, making the TV ideal for office work. This is important as this year the model also debuts in a 43" size, which can easily sit on a desk and serve as a large monitor. Of course, some users opting for the 43" will be gamers, and here too there are no complaints. The TV supports 4K at 120 Hz, so gameplay is smooth and enjoyable. It's a bit of a shame that there wasn't a mode with a higher refresh rate, such as the 144Hz claimed by the manufacturer, as PC gamers would definitely appreciate that. Despite this, the QNED86A6A performs really well as a monitor for gaming and work.

Viewing angles

2.1/10

6.9/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
87%
61%

The viewing angles on the Philips PUS8209 are poor, which is typical for a VA panel. When watched at an angle, the brightness of the image drops significantly, and the colours lose their depth, which can greatly affect viewing comfort, especially in larger groups or in an unusual setup of the television in relation to the viewer.

QNED86A6A performs very well in this regard. The IPS panel used here ensures that the image retains its brightness and colour saturation even when viewed at an angle. There is no fading effect here, which often occurs in cheaper TVs with VA panels. Of course – it’s not worth comparing it to the level offered by organic panels, where colours and contrast hold perfectly at almost any angle. But as far as LCD TVs go, this is definitely one of the better results and is more than sufficient for watching movies or sports together on the couch with a larger group.

TV efficiency during daytime

4.4/10

5.8/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

LG QNED86A / QNED85A / QNED87A: 462 cd/m2

Philips PUS8209: 277 cd/m2

The Philips PUS8209 features a satin screen coating that only moderately suppresses reflections, which may be inadequate in bright room lighting. However, the biggest issue is the low brightness at just 280 nits. In practice, this means that watching content during the day, especially in strong sunlight, can be a challenge as the picture appears too dark to provide comfortable viewing.

QNED86A6A is not a master of brightness, but it manages adequately. Thanks to the moderately high brightness of the panel and quite decent glare reduction, the TV performs well in typical, moderately lit living rooms. The picture remains clear, and the colours do not lose their intensity in daylight. However, let's not kid ourselves, this is not a screen that will handle extremely bright conditions, where sunlight floods in through large windows and strongly saturates the room.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
PFS LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.147.081
33.20.74
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

TV features

4.7/10

8.4/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    No
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes

Philips PUS8209 uses the Titan OS operating system, which, while simple to use, remains limited in terms of functionality. The available number of applications is small compared to more developed ecosystems like Google TV, which may be disappointing for users accustomed to broader capabilities. Additionally, the lack of support for AirPlay restricts compatibility with Apple devices, reducing the flexibility of the television in streaming content. The remote, though interesting, requires aiming at the screen, which may not appeal to everyone.

The absence of more advanced features such as PiP (Picture-in-Picture) or program recording further limits the device's capabilities in everyday use.

Philips PUS8209 is a television that catches attention with its interesting feature of a three-sided Ambilight system, which is a dynamic backlighting of the wall behind the television that adjusts its colours and intensity to the content displayed on the screen. This effect creates the impression of greater image depth and enhances immersion, especially in darkened rooms. Unfortunately, its potential is limited by the Titan OS operating system, which leaves much to be desired. The limited number of applications and the lack of support for popular features such as AirPlay can be a significant drawback for more demanding users. While Ambilight distinguishes this model from the competition, shortcomings in the operating system significantly affect the overall functionality of the television.

Smart Features: webOS

QNED86A6A runs on the well-known webOS – a system that has been a strong point of LG TVs for years. Everything operates quickly and smoothly, applications launch without significant delays, although the interface can sometimes feel a bit overloaded with ads. Fortunately, day to day, the convenience outweighs the shortcomings. A significant advantage is the Magic Remote, which allows you to control the cursor like a mouse – it's one of those solutions that you quickly get used to and later find hard to give up. In the new version, the remote is slimmer, as it has been stripped of the numeric keypad. Some will appreciate the simplicity, while others will miss the classic set of buttons; it’s more a matter of habit.

Classic Features

On board, we also find some solutions that in 2025 are not always obvious. There is the option to record programs from the built-in DVB-T2 tuners to USB, so you can easily return to a match or series at any time. In the evening, Bluetooth headphone support is handy – especially if someone in the house falls asleep quicker than we do. Additionally, there’s a full set of HDMI 2.1 ports with eARC support and audio formats such as Dolby Digital or Dolby Atmos.

Playing files from USB

8/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the Philips PUS8209 performs well in everyday use. It smoothly handles Polish characters in subtitles and allows for adjustments to the colour and size of the font, which significantly enhances the comfort of using this feature. More demanding users may notice some limitations in the supported file formats, however, for most applications in everyday use, this player should be fully sufficient.

The built-in media player in the QNED86A6A handles the most popular audio and video formats quite well. During testing, we had no issues playing MP4, MKV, or MP3 files; everything played smoothly and without hiccups. The TV also managed most images, although here we encountered a common barrier for many manufacturers – the lack of full support for the HEIC format from Apple. So, if you regularly use an iPhone and store photos in this standard, you'll need to convert them beforehand or, better yet, transfer them using AirPlay. Other than that, it's hard to find fault; as far as built-in solutions go, it's really decent.

Apps

6.2/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Sound

5/10

6/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    84dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound on the Philips PUS8209 can be described as average, typical for televisions in this price range. The 2x10 W speakers do not offer exceptional quality or depth; however, they are sufficient for everyday TV watching. On the plus side, it should be noted that there is a wide range of supported audio codecs, such as Dolby Atmos and DTS, which can significantly enhance audio quality when paired with external sound systems, like soundbars or home theatre setups.

In terms of sound, the QNED86A6A performs quite decently, but let's not kid ourselves – it’s not a level that will impress home cinema enthusiasts. The sound is clear and distinct, dialogues are easily heard, but overall it sounds rather flat and definitely lacks solid bass tones. For everyday TV watching, streaming services, or news, it’s an acceptable level, however, if you're planning to watch movies or play games more often, even a basic soundbar will make a significant difference.

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

84dBC (Max)

75dBC