Philips PUS8209 vs LG NANO81A / NANO80A

Direct comparison

PUS8209

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

5.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.4

    5.1

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.1

    5.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    5.4

  • Gaming on console

    6.6

    6.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    4.4

    4.0

  • Utility functions

    4.7

    6.6

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    5.0

    6.2

Advantages

  • High native contrast

  • Three-sided Ambilight system – unique backlighting for the wall behind the TV that enhances immersion while watching

  • Low input lag – around 13 ms

  • Has essential features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Support for Polish characters and subtitle customization – built-in player allows for changing the colour and size of the font

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS – wide range of supported audio codecs

  • Wide viewing angles (IPS panel)

  • Very low input lag (around 10-12 ms)

  • Smooth webOS 2025 system

  • Intuitive Magic remote with pointer

  • Better colour gamut coverage thanks to NanoCell filter

  • Excellent as a PC monitor (sharp fonts, Chroma 4:4:4)

  • Decent features for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG)

  • Extensive calibration options and natural colours after adjustments

  • Good image processing and efficient scaling of older content

  • Noticeable low-frequency boost in sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • Titan OS operating system – limited number of applications

  • Poor brightness (280 nits) – issues with viewing in bright conditions

  • Poor viewing angles – typical of VA panels,

  • Issues with font rendering

  • Poor black level and low contrast

  • Low brightness (around 250 nits – weak for very bright rooms)

  • Only 60 Hz refresh rate

  • USB player does not support HEIC files and very large images (over 20 Mpix)

Our verdict

The Philips PUS8209 is a model that stands out primarily due to its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided backlighting behind the television dynamically adjusts to the image, adding an exceptional atmosphere while watching movies or gaming. This solution, for which Philips is renowned, makes a difference and could be a great choice for those looking for something more unique for everyday use. In terms of picture quality, the television performs quite well, especially in this price range. The VA panel provides solid contrast and decent black levels, which is particularly effective in the evenings in dimly lit rooms. Watching movies in such conditions is truly enjoyable, although the screen brightness (280 nits) leaves much to be desired – in bright rooms, the picture can look washed out, and HDR content does not impress. When it comes to gaming, the PUS8209 also has a few advantages. Support for VRR, ALLM, and a low input lag of 13 ms makes gameplay smooth and responsive. Of course, this is not hardware for advanced gamers, but for those who occasionally pick up a controller, it should suffice. The biggest downside is the operating system, Titan OS. Many popular apps are missing, and the interface doesn't always run as smoothly as one would like. The remote control, which requires pointing at the television, can be frustrating, especially in situations where quick access is expected. In summary: the Philips PUS8209 is a television that works well for basic applications. Ambilight adds uniqueness and enhances the atmosphere while watching. In everyday use or occasional gaming, it does the job, but its limitations – particularly in screen brightness and operating system – may be problematic for more demanding users. If we are looking for straightforward equipment with an unusual visual addition, this model is worth considering.

LG NANO81A is essentially a continuation of the NanoCell series, which has hardly changed over the past few years. Aside from a new operating system, a refreshed remote, and a few marketing add-ons, we are dealing with practically the same construction that we have known for years. Thanks to the nano-particle filter, the television can display better, cleaner colours than standard budget televisions, and the IPS panel ensures really decent viewing angles. Unfortunately, for these advantages, we pay the price of very poor blacks and low contrast, which is immediately noticeable during night screenings. Although webOS is still one of the best systems on the market, the biggest problem with the NANO81A is its price, which we simply do not understand. In 2025, this model has huge competition not only from brands like TCL and Hisense but... from LG itself. The model we tested earlier, QNED80A, is equipped with local dimming technology, has a brighter panel, and offers a wider colour palette. Interestingly, at the time of writing this review, the technically superior QNED80A is often much cheaper than the NANO81A. In this situation, the existence of the NanoCell model loses its meaning – unless your priority is solely wide viewing angles, but in our opinion, the price you have to pay for them (at the expense of terrible blacks and a higher cost) is simply too high.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Average
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.6/10

1.5/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,050:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

10,200:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

9,050:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,200:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

850:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

750:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Philips PUS8209 positively surprised us in terms of contrast, which is quite solid for its price class. Thanks to the use of a VA panel, it managed to achieve a contrast ratio of 8000:1, which is considered a very good result in this price category. In tests using scenes from the film Oblivion, the television performed well, offering visible light separation. Three independent light sources in the test scene were reproduced without major issues. Similarly, in the case of the film Sicario 2, the black levels, while not perfect, present reasonably well, allowing for the distinction of details in the darker areas of the image. The lack of local dimming technology is noticeable, however, the manufacturer has implemented a "global dimming" feature. This mechanism allows the television to automatically darken or brighten the entire screen depending on the content, which somewhat improves the perception of contrast. Philips PUS8209 offers solid contrast and decent results in tests. Although it lacks the precision of local dimming, its capabilities at this price point are satisfactory and will please most users.

The NanoCell series, including the model NANO81 we tested, is based on an IPS panel. For anyone who's somewhat familiar with screens, this means one thing: huge problems with blacks and contrast. Our measurements here are merciless. A result of 800:1 is, to put it bluntly, a tragic outcome. In practice, this means that what should appear as deep black on the screen looks like a dark grey blob at night. Watching dark films or series in a completely dark room will simply be torture – the image loses all its depth and appears flat. If you do decide to go for this model, we have one key piece of advice for you: don’t watch it in total darkness. To salvage the situation somewhat, it's best to leave a gentle light on in the room, and the ideal solution would be to install LED strips behind the television. Such wall lighting will trick your eye (this is known as simultaneous contrast) and make that grey on the screen seem a bit darker. Nevertheless, the beginning of the test regarding cinematic experiences is looking grim.

HDR effect quality

3.8/10

3.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.4%, Bt.2020: 67.0%
DCI P3: 87.6%, Bt.2020: 65.3%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

231 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

268 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

278 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

274 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

281 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

168 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

252 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

Philips PUS8209

Unfortunately, this is where the problems start. A maximum brightness of 280 nits is definitely too low to experience the true effect of HDR. In practice, the image resembles standard SDR more, so it's hard to talk about deeper visual experiences. On the plus side, the colour gamut coverage is 91.4% DCI-P3, which will be sufficient for most films. It's also worth noting that the image is stable and there are no issues with sudden brightness or colour changes. Overall, HDR on this television is more of a formality than an actual added value. If we're looking for genuine HDR emotions, this model may not meet expectations.

If you're hoping that HDR on the NANO81A will bring tears to your eyes, I have to disappoint you. This TV is just too dark to show what this format is really about. With a brightness of only 250 nits, HDR really only exists on paper here. In practice, during viewing, it's very hard to tell whether we're watching material in high dynamic range or regular SDR – it simply lacks that “punch” of light in the bright parts of the image. But, to balance out the criticism, we do have one light at the end of the tunnel – and quite a distinct one at that. It's about colour gamut coverage. Here, the NanoCell filter shows that it's not just marketing nonsense. Our measurements indicated that the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is around 88%. That's a really solid result, placing this model significantly above typical budget models based on regular white LEDs without any filters. Of course, it still lags a bit behind QLED TVs or advanced panels with PFS filters, but for this price range, the colours are surprisingly saturated and vibrant. It’s just a shame that this low brightness doesn't allow them to fully “spread their wings” with the Nano filter.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Philips PUS8209 offers many picture modes, but the best of them, without a doubt, is the Filmmaker mode. Despite its proud name, it has its distinct problems. For HD content, the white balance is characterised by a strong dominance of red, causing the image to be significantly warmer than it should be in reality. The brightness characteristic (gamma), although correct in mid-tones, has serious issues at the beginning and end of the graph. Drops in shadows result in a loss of detail in dark areas, and spikes in bright areas make some elements look unnatural.

For high-quality content in 4K HDR, the situation reverses. In this case, blue dominates, leading to an artificial image boost effect, reminiscent of unnatural retail settings. Such an image looks unappealing and does not align with the creators' intentions. An additional problem is the EOTF curve, responsible for brightness in HDR materials. It deviates significantly from the reference graph, causing the image to appear too dark, stripping depth and detail from HDR content.

Against this backdrop, the errors in the Color Checker test and deviations in colour palette reproduction are exceptionally large, which further negatively affects the overall image quality. The Filmmaker mode, while the best among those available, requires substantial corrections to truly convey the full vision of the director.

For every film fan, the natural choice in LG televisions is the Filmmaker Mode. It is designed to show the image as the director intended – without unnecessary "enhancements". Unfortunately, in the case of our test unit NANO81A, the factory settings left a bit to be desired. The main issue turned out to be the white balance. Measurements revealed a distinct deficiency of blue, which in practice meant that many scenes had a slightly yellowish, even "yellowed" tint. The white wasn’t perfectly clean, which took away the freshness of the image. Additionally, the brightness management wasn't perfect either – the factory-set gamma was too low. The image often appeared oversaturated, as if it had been pulled too much from the shadows, which detracted from its naturalness and depth. Fortunately, LG, even in this relatively low price range, does not block access to advanced settings. The calibration options for this model are extensive, which is a significant plus for those who enjoy "fiddling" in the menu. We decided to approach the matter our way and see how much we could squeeze out of this panel with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.3/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, the white balance for HD and 4K content has significantly improved. While we haven't achieved a perfectly flat characteristic, the result is definitely better than before. The image on the television no longer appears either artificially warm or overly cold, which significantly enhances the naturalness of the displayed content. The brightness characteristic (gamma) has also been adjusted – the most significant issues at the beginning and end of the graph have been mitigated. The EOTF curve, which is responsible for brightness in 4K HDR materials, has been stabilised, eliminating problems with excessive dimming of the image. In the colour palette test, some imperfections can still be seen due to the average coverage of the wide colour gamut, which is a limitation of the hardware itself. Nevertheless, the final result is clearly better than pre-calibration – the image looks more natural and approaches the expectations for Filmmaker mode.

After calibration, the NANO81A is a completely different television. What LG offers in terms of image enhancement tools, even in such an affordable model, deserves major credit. We were able to completely eliminate that annoying yellowing of whites and make the colours natural, vibrant, and simply "real". In SDR content (i.e., regular television, YouTube, or older films), the picture now looks miles better – it’s clean, well-balanced, and no longer strains the eyes with strange hues. It’s clear that this panel has significant potential, which is simply wasted out of the box due to poor presets. However, we have one serious reservation that calibration cannot fully overcome – it's about brightness management in HDR mode. The LG algorithm in this model is very conservative. The TV deliberately dims the HDR image to avoid clipping the already weak blacks of the IPS panel. The developers faced a choice: either provide more light and accept that black would become light grey, or dial down the brightness to maintain any contrast. They chose the latter. Despite this, after our adjustments, watching anything on the NANO81 is considerably better.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

9.3/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Philips PUS8209 presents a decent gradation in bright scenes, where the tonal transitions are smooth enough not to be jarring. Unfortunately, in darker scenes, such as red water, the TV struggles noticeably. Issues with blending shades and a lack of precision in reproducing subtle colour differences are very apparent here.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is an element where the NANO81A really shines. LG proves here that it can refine image processing algorithms even in its cheaper models. During testing, we practically did not notice any banding phenomenon, that annoying "stepping" visible where one colour should smoothly transition into another. Everything looks incredibly natural and smooth. This is clearly evident in bright scenes from the film Kingsman, where the backgrounds remain clean and free from digital artefacts. However, what makes an even greater impression is how the television handles extremely difficult, dark, and foggy shots in The Revenant. Where many budget panels falter and produce ugly blotches instead of a smooth mist, the NANO81A holds its ground, offering very velvety transitions. The only downside is the fact that with darker shades, you may notice the weaker black levels of this television rather than any issues with colour blending.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The television offers a “Distortion Reduction” feature that effectively improves the gradation of tonal transitions, particularly when set to the minimum level. Unfortunately, this comes at a cost – the feature also smooths out details like material textures. On the plus side, it’s worth noting that the operation of this option does not negatively affect the film grain, which remains intact.

As for image scaling (upscaling), the television generates a plastic, soft image that generally looks pleasant. However, in the background, issues with aliasing of certain elements, such as branches or small details, can sometimes be noticed, which may decrease the quality of the reception. Despite these minor imperfections, the overall experience of scaling is satisfactory.

It often happens that cheap 4K panels ruthlessly expose all the "dirty laundry" and imperfections in lower resolution materials. However, with the LG NANO81A, the situation is completely different. It's a really solid performer when it comes to handling content that's far from ideal. The built-in processor does a great job with upscaling. Even older recordings look quite decent on this screen – the image is coherent, cleaned of digital noise, and simply pleasant to the eye. A big plus is the gradation reduction feature, which you can find in the settings. It is exceptionally effective in combating colour banding, which is a godsend when watching low bitrate materials, such as from some streaming services or older files from the web. However, it is worth maintaining a certain vigilance. Since we are dealing with a less powerful chip than in LG's top models, too aggressive a setting for this option can sometimes result in minor artifacts or slight blurring of details. Despite this risk, I definitely encourage experimentation with this feature – in many cases, it can save the viewing experience and make low-quality material fully watchable.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.8/10

4.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

The 60 Hz panel in the Philips PUS8209 is mainly suited for watching movies, but here you can also feel a certain shortcoming. The television does not offer any motion smoothing that would allow you to adjust the fluidity of the picture to individual preferences, which for some users may be disappointing.

In terms of motion fluidity, the NANO81A unfortunately has a bit of a hurdle. The television is based on a panel with a refresh rate of 60Hz. If you're looking for perfect sharpness in dynamic football matches or fast-paced action games, you might feel somewhat dissatisfied. With such a low native refresh rate, fast objects on the screen will always be a bit blurry.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Philips PUS8209 offers basic features useful for gamers, such as variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic low latency mode (ALLM), and Game Bar, which makes managing settings easier.

Unfortunately, due to the 60 Hz panel, the TV will not meet the expectations of more demanding gamers who are looking for higher fluidity and precision of image. Additionally, this model does not support any HDR mode dedicated to gaming, such as HGiG or Dolby Vision, which further limits its capabilities in this regard.

NANO81A is unfortunately not a device designed with esports in mind. The lack of 120 Hz signal support is a fact that users planning to purchase this model simply have to accept. Nevertheless, LG’s engineers have worked hard to squeeze the maximum potential from this 60 Hz panel, offering a set of features that genuinely improve gaming comfort. First and foremost, the television supports VRR technology (in the range of 48–60 Hz) and ALLM. This ensures that the image remains stable and does not "tear," and the device automatically switches to low latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from a console. Managing these settings is extremely simple thanks to a dedicated system overlay that allows for a quick preview of parameters without leaving the game. A very significant advantage is support for the HGiG format. This solution is crucial for owners of modern consoles, as it allows the television to correctly "understand" the intentions of game developers regarding HDR tone mapping. In practice, this helps avoid the effect of "blown-out" bright spots, such as clouds or light sources, which is unfortunately a common issue in budget LCD televisions.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
13 ms
1080p120
2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Input lag in the Philips PUS8209 is one of its strongest points. With a value of around 13 ms, the TV provides a very quick response time, which should satisfy most gamers, both casual and more advanced. Such a result allows for comfortable gameplay even in dynamic games.

When it comes to response speed, the LG NANO81A performs exceptionally well. The input lag we measured is around 12 ms. This is a very low level, which for a gamer means one thing – the delay between moving the stick on the controller and the reaction on the screen is practically unnoticeable. The television excels in dynamic titles where every millisecond counts, and in this respect, it does not fall short of significantly more expensive models.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
13ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

On paper, collaboration with a PC seems promising, particularly due to support for 4:4:4 chroma, which should ensure good font readability and detail reproduction. In practice, however, the television has significant issues with displaying text, especially on dark backgrounds, where the so-called pixelation is clearly visible, negatively impacting work comfort.

Additionally, the lack of support for technologies like G-Sync means that gaming smoothness when connected to a PC leaves much to be desired, making this model less attractive for users looking for a television for gaming on a computer.

Nano81A is a really solid monitor for text work. Thanks to the IPS panel and proper implementation of Chroma 4:4:4, the fonts are very clear and sharp – practically everyone will be satisfied with how this screen performs as a monitor. We only noticed one small detail that we picked up during our laboratory scrutiny: the vertical lines of dark text are slightly darker than the horizontal ones. However, this is such a minimal phenomenon that we did not decide to deduct points for it. The scores only went down with features typically for PC gamers – there was a lack of G-Sync support and high refresh rates above 60 Hz, which will be a significant downside for those looking for a screen for dynamic gaming on the computer.

Viewing angles

2.1/10

6.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
87%
66%

The viewing angles on the Philips PUS8209 are poor, which is typical for a VA panel. When watched at an angle, the brightness of the image drops significantly, and the colours lose their depth, which can greatly affect viewing comfort, especially in larger groups or in an unusual setup of the television in relation to the viewer.

This is the moment when the LG NANO81A can finally "breathe" and make up for the points lost in the black and contrast categories. Due to the use of an IPS panel, the viewing angles here are simply very good. It is in this section that the tested model gains the most and clearly shows its advantage over competing televisions equipped with VA panels. In practice, this means that the image does not lose quality even when viewed at a large angle. This makes the NANO81A a great choice for people who have a wide furniture layout in their living room or often watch matches and movies with a larger group.

Daytime performance

4.4/10

4/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

LG NANO81A / NANO80A : 247 cd/m2

Philips PUS8209: 277 cd/m2

The Philips PUS8209 features a satin screen coating that only moderately suppresses reflections, which may be inadequate in bright room lighting. However, the biggest issue is the low brightness at just 280 nits. In practice, this means that watching content during the day, especially in strong sunlight, can be a challenge as the picture appears too dark to provide comfortable viewing.

NANO81A is a relatively dark television, so it works best in rooms where you have control over the lighting. With a brightness of around 250 nits, it's hard to recommend it with a clear conscience for very bright, heavily sunlit lounges – in such conditions, the picture will simply lack punch. Nonetheless, LG deserves a small plus for the screen finish. The satin matrix used here quite effectively suppresses reflections. As a result, even if there is a bit of light in the room, you won't see reflections of every detail from your surroundings on the screen. So, if you can slightly close the blinds, a daytime viewing experience will definitely be possible, but this model simply wasn’t designed to "fight" full sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
White LED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.147.081
33.21.62
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips PUS8209 TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details

TV features

4.7/10

6.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    No
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips PUS8209 TV features
Review Philips PUS8209 TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features

Philips PUS8209 uses the Titan OS operating system, which, while simple to use, remains limited in terms of functionality. The available number of applications is small compared to more developed ecosystems like Google TV, which may be disappointing for users accustomed to broader capabilities. Additionally, the lack of support for AirPlay restricts compatibility with Apple devices, reducing the flexibility of the television in streaming content. The remote, though interesting, requires aiming at the screen, which may not appeal to everyone.

The absence of more advanced features such as PiP (Picture-in-Picture) or program recording further limits the device's capabilities in everyday use.

Philips PUS8209 is a television that catches attention with its interesting feature of a three-sided Ambilight system, which is a dynamic backlighting of the wall behind the television that adjusts its colours and intensity to the content displayed on the screen. This effect creates the impression of greater image depth and enhances immersion, especially in darkened rooms. Unfortunately, its potential is limited by the Titan OS operating system, which leaves much to be desired. The limited number of applications and the lack of support for popular features such as AirPlay can be a significant drawback for more demanding users. While Ambilight distinguishes this model from the competition, shortcomings in the operating system significantly affect the overall functionality of the television.

Smart Features: WebOS

One of the greatest advantages of the NANO81A model is its “brain,” that is, the operating system. LG has implemented a full-fledged WebOS version for 2025, which in terms of fluidity and usability is on par with the more expensive models from this brand. Applications launch smoothly, and navigating the menu is a pure pleasure - there’s no sign of the annoying stutters often found in budget competitors. This is all thanks to the unique remote with a pointer (cursor) function, which has undergone a visual overhaul this year. The manufacturer has opted for minimalism - the new Magic remote is significantly smaller and more ergonomic than its predecessors. It fits perfectly in the hand, but this change has a downside as well. The physical number section has completely disappeared from the casing. For younger users, accustomed to streaming and selecting tiles, this will be no problem. However, older household members, who are used to entering channel numbers from memory, will have to change their long-standing habits.

Everyday Use

In terms of features that we would call “classic,” the NANO81A relies on tried-and-true standards. It is not a multimedia powerhouse that will surprise you with exotic additions, but in everyday television use, it performs flawlessly. The operation of traditional terrestrial or cable television, including even the old good Teletext, is correct and intuitive. Wireless communication also deserves praise. The Bluetooth module works very reliably, allowing for quick and stable connections to a game console controller or wireless headphones and speakers. It’s simply a television that “works” – it is stable, predictable, and does not cause unnecessary complications in daily use.

Apps

6.7/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
No
24 Mpix
No
No
28 Mpix
No
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the Philips PUS8209 performs well in everyday use. It smoothly handles Polish characters in subtitles and allows for adjustments to the colour and size of the font, which significantly enhances the comfort of using this feature. More demanding users may notice some limitations in the supported file formats, however, for most applications in everyday use, this player should be fully sufficient.

Many users still rely on their own USB drives to display movies or photos on a large screen. In this respect, the NANO81A performs quite decently – the built-in player supports a wide range of video and audio codecs, so most movie libraries will fire up "straight away". However, it's important to remember the specifics of the WebOS system. Since it is a closed environment, we are stuck with what the manufacturer has provided for us. There is no option to install alternative players (like the popular VLC), so if the system player can't handle something, there isn't much that can be done about it. During testing, we encountered a few specific limitations. Firstly, there is a lack of support for HEIC files. If you take photos with an iPhone and want to view them directly from a USB drive, the TV simply won't see them – it's worth changing the save format to JPG on the phone right away. We also noticed that the player struggles with processing very large graphic files. Photos with a resolution of around 20–28 Mpix may not load or may cause system errors. Aside from these exceptions, everyday multimedia handling is hassle-free.

Sound

5/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound on the Philips PUS8209 can be described as average, typical for televisions in this price range. The 2x10 W speakers do not offer exceptional quality or depth; however, they are sufficient for everyday TV watching. On the plus side, it should be noted that there is a wide range of supported audio codecs, such as Dolby Atmos and DTS, which can significantly enhance audio quality when paired with external sound systems, like soundbars or home theatre setups.

In terms of audio, the LG NANO81A is surprisingly good compared to its higher-end brother, the QNED80A model. Interestingly, the NanoCell performs slightly better, likely due to its somewhat thicker casing. The increased volume allows for the extraction of any low-frequency nuances – while the bass may not be powerful, it is more clearly defined than in thinner constructions. However, one shouldn’t expect miracles. It’s still a standard 2.0 speaker setup with a total power of 20 W, so the overall sound characteristic remains similar to other models in this price range. The mid and high tones are decent, making dialogues in films and news programs clear. While this slight improvement in the lower registers is appreciated, for true home theatre or listening to music, it’s still worth considering the addition of even a simple soundbar.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

81dBC (Max)

75dBC