Philips PUS8209 vs Dreame S100

Direct comparison

PUS8209

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

6.8

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    5.4

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.1

    6.2

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    6.6

    7.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    4.4

    6.0

  • Utility functions

    4.7

    5.9

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.0

    8.3

Advantages

  • High native contrast

  • Three-sided Ambilight system – unique backlighting for the wall behind the TV that enhances immersion while watching

  • Low input lag – around 13 ms

  • Has essential features for gamers - VRR and ALLM

  • Support for Polish characters and subtitle customization – built-in player allows for changing the colour and size of the font

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS – wide range of supported audio codecs

  • Great viewing angles (thanks to the ADS panel)

  • Pretty good blacks thanks to Mini-LED backlighting

  • Good colours thanks to the PFS filter (advertised as QLED)

  • High motion fluidity (144 Hz panel)

  • Low input lag (in game mode)

  • A lot of gaming features, including two HDMI 2.1 ports (VRR, ALLM, and Game Bar)

  • Google TV system with a rich library of apps

  • Good sound thanks to the built-in “soundbar”

Disadvantages

No like
  • Titan OS operating system – limited number of applications

  • Poor brightness (280 nits) – issues with viewing in bright conditions

  • Poor viewing angles – typical of VA panels,

  • Issues with font rendering

  • Underdeveloped local dimming algorithms (can cause annoying brightness drops)

  • Outdated image processor and poor digital processing of the Google TV system

  • Software bugs, occasional stuttering

  • Useless Filmmaker mode (completely blocks any changes to picture settings)

  • Poor HDR format implementation in games (no HGiG support and high input lag in Dolby Vision mode)

Our verdict

The Philips PUS8209 is a model that stands out primarily due to its unique Ambilight system. The three-sided backlighting behind the television dynamically adjusts to the image, adding an exceptional atmosphere while watching movies or gaming. This solution, for which Philips is renowned, makes a difference and could be a great choice for those looking for something more unique for everyday use. In terms of picture quality, the television performs quite well, especially in this price range. The VA panel provides solid contrast and decent black levels, which is particularly effective in the evenings in dimly lit rooms. Watching movies in such conditions is truly enjoyable, although the screen brightness (280 nits) leaves much to be desired – in bright rooms, the picture can look washed out, and HDR content does not impress. When it comes to gaming, the PUS8209 also has a few advantages. Support for VRR, ALLM, and a low input lag of 13 ms makes gameplay smooth and responsive. Of course, this is not hardware for advanced gamers, but for those who occasionally pick up a controller, it should suffice. The biggest downside is the operating system, Titan OS. Many popular apps are missing, and the interface doesn't always run as smoothly as one would like. The remote control, which requires pointing at the television, can be frustrating, especially in situations where quick access is expected. In summary: the Philips PUS8209 is a television that works well for basic applications. Ambilight adds uniqueness and enhances the atmosphere while watching. In everyday use or occasional gaming, it does the job, but its limitations – particularly in screen brightness and operating system – may be problematic for more demanding users. If we are looking for straightforward equipment with an unusual visual addition, this model is worth considering.

Dreame S100 is a successful, though still somewhat rough debut in the Mini-LED segment. Hardware-wise, the TV stands up for itself: Mini-LED technology with local dimming provides a deep and appealing black for the average viewer, and the IPS/ADS panel offers brilliant viewing angles. This is an interesting combination, as it is extremely rare in the LCD TV segment, which will certainly please those with wide living rooms or large corner sofas. If we add to this a full gaming package (HDMI 2.1, 144 Hz), the Google TV system with an almost endless number of apps, and very strong 4.1.2 audio with 70 W power, which performs well above the market average, we have an incredibly versatile screen.

Where's the catch? In the software. Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 suffers from typical “growing pains” – the outdated processor struggles with advanced digital processing, and the local dimming algorithms can be frustrating in more demanding scenes. Additionally, the Google TV system itself can occasionally experience slight stutters. So if you're looking for a well-equipped Mini-LED for a wide living room and are willing to overlook its minor system hiccups that the manufacturer can hopefully fix with future updates – this is a very interesting option. The hardware potential is huge, although the software still needs some final polishing.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Black
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

6.6/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 160 (10 x 16)

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,050:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

7,300:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

10,200:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

9,050:1

Review Philips PUS8209 Contrast and black detail

Result

8,200:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

32,850:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

11,800:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,900:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,650:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

1,700:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

Philips PUS8209 positively surprised us in terms of contrast, which is quite solid for its price class. Thanks to the use of a VA panel, it managed to achieve a contrast ratio of 8000:1, which is considered a very good result in this price category. In tests using scenes from the film Oblivion, the television performed well, offering visible light separation. Three independent light sources in the test scene were reproduced without major issues. Similarly, in the case of the film Sicario 2, the black levels, while not perfect, present reasonably well, allowing for the distinction of details in the darker areas of the image. The lack of local dimming technology is noticeable, however, the manufacturer has implemented a "global dimming" feature. This mechanism allows the television to automatically darken or brighten the entire screen depending on the content, which somewhat improves the perception of contrast. Philips PUS8209 offers solid contrast and decent results in tests. Although it lacks the precision of local dimming, its capabilities at this price point are satisfactory and will please most users.

The Dreame S100 is a Mini-LED television that features an IPS/ADS panel in its 65" version. This type of panel doesn't inherently offer the best contrast on the market, but thanks to a fairly dense Mini-LED backlight, the black levels in this model are actually quite impressive. In less demanding scenes, the contrast can reach values of 30,000:1. This is a result several times higher and practically impossible to achieve for any type of LCD panel without local dimming technology. This means that the black levels and contrast in the S100 will be quite appealing for the less demanding viewer.

Unfortunately, in more challenging scenes where a considerable number of small elements appear against a black background, the local dimming algorithms in the Dreame S100 don't perform perfectly. The TV can either dim excessively, making the blacks really deep but rendering almost nothing visible on the screen, or go the other way – showcasing a vast amount of detail, but resulting in very poor contrast. The blacks in very demanding scenes around bright objects then take on a greyish hue (halo effect). This is a typical limitation of Mini-LED televisions in the lower and mid-range segments, and unfortunately, the Dreame S100 is no exception, doing particularly poorly in this regard. However, it should be noted that overall, the contrast and black levels here are definitely better than those found in LCD televisions without any form of local dimming technology.

HDR effect quality

3.8/10

3.4/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 91.4%, Bt.2020: 67.0%
DCI P3: 94.6%, Bt.2020: 71.6%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

231 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

268 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

278 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

274 nit

Review Philips PUS8209 Brightness measurement

Result

281 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

503 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

71 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

241 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

42 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

589 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Dreame S100

Philips PUS8209

Unfortunately, this is where the problems start. A maximum brightness of 280 nits is definitely too low to experience the true effect of HDR. In practice, the image resembles standard SDR more, so it's hard to talk about deeper visual experiences. On the plus side, the colour gamut coverage is 91.4% DCI-P3, which will be sufficient for most films. It's also worth noting that the image is stable and there are no issues with sudden brightness or colour changes. Overall, HDR on this television is more of a formality than an actual added value. If we're looking for genuine HDR emotions, this model may not meet expectations.

The Dreame S100 is a relatively bright television. In movie mode, the brightness we measured reached around 600 nits. This is a really good result, although not the highest considering the competition in this price range. In full-screen scenes, it's clear that the television can generate an image that hits the mark in terms of brightness. Unfortunately, when more complex scenes appeared on the screen, the local dimming algorithm in this model tried above all to maintain the deepest blacks. However, this came at the expense of the HDR effect – and in a drastic way. In such scenes, the brightness of the bright elements fell below 100 nits, which is a downright tragic result, far from any HDR effect. This aspect can be improved, but there are caveats. You just need to change the local dimming setting in the television's menu; however, then the blacks in such scenes simply turn grey. It's a pity that Dreame wasn't able to refine the local dimming algorithms better, and the S100 is another example that the number of local dimming zones doesn't always translate into a better picture. As a consolation, it's worth noting that the Dreame S100 is marketed as a 'QLED' type television, although it actually uses a PFS LED filter. As a result, the colours are appropriately saturated, and our measured DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage exceeded 94%.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

Philips PUS8209 offers many picture modes, but the best of them, without a doubt, is the Filmmaker mode. Despite its proud name, it has its distinct problems. For HD content, the white balance is characterised by a strong dominance of red, causing the image to be significantly warmer than it should be in reality. The brightness characteristic (gamma), although correct in mid-tones, has serious issues at the beginning and end of the graph. Drops in shadows result in a loss of detail in dark areas, and spikes in bright areas make some elements look unnatural.

For high-quality content in 4K HDR, the situation reverses. In this case, blue dominates, leading to an artificial image boost effect, reminiscent of unnatural retail settings. Such an image looks unappealing and does not align with the creators' intentions. An additional problem is the EOTF curve, responsible for brightness in HDR materials. It deviates significantly from the reference graph, causing the image to appear too dark, stripping depth and detail from HDR content.

Against this backdrop, the errors in the Color Checker test and deviations in colour palette reproduction are exceptionally large, which further negatively affects the overall image quality. The Filmmaker mode, while the best among those available, requires substantial corrections to truly convey the full vision of the director.

We tested the Dreame S100 in "movie" mode and definitely recommend using this setting for watching all kinds of content. Interestingly, in the deeper settings of the TV, we also find a dedicated "Filmmaker" mode, which is now available from almost every manufacturer. However, in the case of the Dreame S100, we do not recommend using it – it blocks all settings related to the picture and does not allow for any configuration in the menu - not even a motion smoother. So how do the factory colours fare in the S100? Not too bad, but not great either. The TV itself had a noticeable blue tint, which is clearly evident in our white balance measurements. As a result, the picture was artificially brightened, and the colours had a slight bluish tint. This is also confirmed by the Color Checker palette, which showed how the colour samples leaned towards blue, generating quite significant colour errors. On the other hand, the picture looked definitely better in HDR mode, where the colour errors were not as prominent, although they were still far from ideal. Here, the white balance was also too heavily skewed towards blue, causing quite significant errors in color reproduction.

Color reproduction after calibration

8.3/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After calibration, the white balance for HD and 4K content has significantly improved. While we haven't achieved a perfectly flat characteristic, the result is definitely better than before. The image on the television no longer appears either artificially warm or overly cold, which significantly enhances the naturalness of the displayed content. The brightness characteristic (gamma) has also been adjusted – the most significant issues at the beginning and end of the graph have been mitigated. The EOTF curve, which is responsible for brightness in 4K HDR materials, has been stabilised, eliminating problems with excessive dimming of the image. In the colour palette test, some imperfections can still be seen due to the average coverage of the wide colour gamut, which is a limitation of the hardware itself. Nevertheless, the final result is clearly better than pre-calibration – the image looks more natural and approaches the expectations for Filmmaker mode.

The Dreame S100 has proven to be a device very amenable to professional calibration. In its menu, we found a plethora of advanced options that allowed us to effectively correct factory errors. Thanks to the advanced white balance correction – both in SDR and HDR content – we completely eliminated excess blue components. The image instantly became much more natural and pleasant to view. After fully tuning the colours, the errors in the Color Checker test dropped below a Delta E value of 2-3. For the average viewer, this means that any colour distortions became almost impossible to see with the naked eye. It's really a nice surprise, as often new brands in the TV market have significant problems with the correct implementation and functioning of sliders in the calibration menu. Here, everything worked as it should. The only thing we need to criticise is the way the TV manages its brightness in HDR. Due to the specific nature of the local dimming algorithms, our measured EOTF curve shows anomalies. In places where high highlights should appear, there is a slight bump in the curve above the reference line. In practice, this results in unnatural brightening of certain, the brightest elements in movies or games. Despite this minor flaw, professional calibration brings a huge, very positive change to this model.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

Philips PUS8209 presents a decent gradation in bright scenes, where the tonal transitions are smooth enough not to be jarring. Unfortunately, in darker scenes, such as red water, the TV struggles noticeably. Issues with blending shades and a lack of precision in reproducing subtle colour differences are very apparent here.

The transition between individual shades on the Dreame S100 is quite good. Analyzing most content in HDR10 format, we did not notice significant issues with banding. Only some very extreme and dark scenes revealed the problem of shade stepping. The situation is somewhat worse for content in Dolby Vision format*. Here, the colour gradation clearly deteriorates, and the tonal transitions from one colour to another are more visible and stand out from each other. Thus, the rating of this element on our site is slightly lower when we take into account viewing (on streaming platforms) in this format.

*we'll add the photos after modifying the site 😉

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

5.5/10

4/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The television offers a “Distortion Reduction” feature that effectively improves the gradation of tonal transitions, particularly when set to the minimum level. Unfortunately, this comes at a cost – the feature also smooths out details like material textures. On the plus side, it’s worth noting that the operation of this option does not negatively affect the film grain, which remains intact.

As for image scaling (upscaling), the television generates a plastic, soft image that generally looks pleasant. However, in the background, issues with aliasing of certain elements, such as branches or small details, can sometimes be noticed, which may decrease the quality of the reception. Despite these minor imperfections, the overall experience of scaling is satisfactory.

For scaling and digital processing in the Dreame S100, the technology used is proudly called Dreamind™ Pro AI by the manufacturer. However, it must be clearly stated that this is not a proprietary processor but rather a marketing term for a chip from MediaTek – specifically, the model MT5889. Unfortunately, we are talking about a rather outdated unit from a time when MediaTek lagged significantly behind the competition in terms of performance. This, unfortunately, has a direct impact on the image, as this chip also handles that. The upscaling in the S100 is fairly average, and the processor has a tendency to artificially over-sharpen edges (fortunately, this can be somewhat tempered with the sharpness slider in the menu). In the options, we also find a feature called "Contour Smoothing," which theoretically is supposed to improve tonal transitions. In practice, it contributes almost no improvement – setting it to any level rarely eliminates visible colour banding, but it can unnecessarily blur elements of the image that should remain sharp.

Another issue is the phenomenon of overscan (cropping the edges of the frame), which is practically visible all the time. Although there is the possibility to set the screen to display the full frame in low-resolution materials, it requires activating the aforementioned Filmmaker mode. And as you may know, this mode completely blocks any changes to other sliders in the picture menu. In our test tables, we noted that the television offers an option to disable overscan, as such a function technically exists in the system – however, in everyday use, while maintaining reasonable picture settings, you will not be able to take advantage of it.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.8/10

7.7/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

The 60 Hz panel in the Philips PUS8209 is mainly suited for watching movies, but here you can also feel a certain shortcoming. The television does not offer any motion smoothing that would allow you to adjust the fluidity of the picture to individual preferences, which for some users may be disappointing.

When it comes to motion fluidity, the Dreame S100 performs really well. It features a 144 Hz refresh rate panel, although in reality, the vast majority of people using it in a conventional way will still be limited to 120 Hz (as this is what today's hardware allows aside from PCs). Thanks to the high refresh rate, the image in motion remains really sharp, largely due to the well-functioning MEMC motion smoother. In the menu, we find predefined modes that enable the TV to efficiently generate artificial frames, which effectively enhances the fluidity of dynamic sports shots, but also helps eliminate motion judder in film and TV series material recorded at 24 frames.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

7.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Philips PUS8209 offers basic features useful for gamers, such as variable refresh rate (VRR), automatic low latency mode (ALLM), and Game Bar, which makes managing settings easier.

Unfortunately, due to the 60 Hz panel, the TV will not meet the expectations of more demanding gamers who are looking for higher fluidity and precision of image. Additionally, this model does not support any HDR mode dedicated to gaming, such as HGiG or Dolby Vision, which further limits its capabilities in this regard.

The Dreame S100 seems almost like the ideal screen for gamers. The television is equipped with 2 HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 40 Gbps, allowing features such as automatic game mode (ALLM) or VRR frame synchronization in the range of 48-144 Hz to work seamlessly on consoles. On board, we also find a well-designed gaming panel (Game Bar). It allows you to continuously preview the most important parameters - from the activated picture modes, to the number of frames rendered by the console, right through to the option of adding a crosshair in the centre of the screen. All of this looks great on paper; however, the biggest issue with the S100 is its implementation of HDR in games. The television does not have a correctly implemented HGiG format. This means a clueless user may misconfigure the console during the initial setup of the screen. Poor configuration can result in an image that is too dark or overexposed (as a guideline: we suggest setting the brightness in the Xbox console menu to around 600 nits, and in the PS5 to 12 clicks). The Dolby Vision format also proves problematic, as it often did not activate at all on the XBOX – Dreame S100 line. And when it was eventually activated, playing was impossible due to the very high input lag often exceeding 100ms. If the manufacturer manages to improve the HDR gaming experience with an update, the S100 will be truly outstanding hardware for gamers. For now, however, compromises must be accepted.

Input lag

10/10

9.2/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
15 ms
1080p120
6 ms
2160p60
13 ms
15 ms
2160p120
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
15 ms
2160p120
6 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
127 ms
2160p120 DV
18 ms

Input lag in the Philips PUS8209 is one of its strongest points. With a value of around 13 ms, the TV provides a very quick response time, which should satisfy most gamers, both casual and more advanced. Such a result allows for comfortable gameplay even in dynamic games.

Aside from the previously mentioned issue with Dolby Vision, the input lag on the Dreame S100 is really very low. Values of around 5-6 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12-15 ms for 60 Hz are such excellent results that even a professional gamer won't be able to feel any delay during gameplay. The response to movements on the controller is almost instantaneous here.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
13ms
6ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

On paper, collaboration with a PC seems promising, particularly due to support for 4:4:4 chroma, which should ensure good font readability and detail reproduction. In practice, however, the television has significant issues with displaying text, especially on dark backgrounds, where the so-called pixelation is clearly visible, negatively impacting work comfort.

Additionally, the lack of support for technologies like G-Sync means that gaming smoothness when connected to a PC leaves much to be desired, making this model less attractive for users looking for a television for gaming on a computer.

The Dreame S100 works well as a large gaming monitor. It has a 144 Hz refresh rate and easily supports G-Sync and FreeSync. However, problems arise when you want to use it for text work. Due to a software bug, the TV struggles with full colour sampling (Chroma 4:4:4) at 120 Hz and 144 Hz refresh rates, resulting in blurry fonts. To make the text perfectly sharp, you need to manually lower the refresh rate to 60 Hz in Windows. This is quite an annoying solution that forces constant jumping between settings if you want to use this screen for both work and gaming.

Viewing angles

2.1/10

6.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
87%
68%

The viewing angles on the Philips PUS8209 are poor, which is typical for a VA panel. When watched at an angle, the brightness of the image drops significantly, and the colours lose their depth, which can greatly affect viewing comfort, especially in larger groups or in an unusual setup of the television in relation to the viewer.

The viewing angles on the Dreame S100 are really good, thanks to the ADS panel. Unlike VA panels, this type of screen allows you to watch the image from a wide angle without noticeable loss of colour saturation and brightness. This comes at the expense of worse native contrast, but for most viewers (especially those with a wide couch) this will be quite a good compromise. There is a lack of Mini-LED TVs with good viewing angles at a reasonable price on the market today, so the S100 nicely fills this niche.

Daytime performance

4.4/10

6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Average
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Good

Panel brightness

Dreame S100: 463 cd/m2

Philips PUS8209: 277 cd/m2

The Philips PUS8209 features a satin screen coating that only moderately suppresses reflections, which may be inadequate in bright room lighting. However, the biggest issue is the low brightness at just 280 nits. In practice, this means that watching content during the day, especially in strong sunlight, can be a challenge as the picture appears too dark to provide comfortable viewing.

The Dreame S100 works well in most living rooms during the day. The television is equipped with a satin screen coating – while it may not perfectly eliminate reflections, it does a great job of preserving colour saturation, which doesn’t fade when the room is bright. In terms of pure brightness, the S100 has a moderately bright screen. It can reach about 600 nits peak in SDR format. This level allows it to be placed in typically sunlit rooms, although – let’s be honest – it’s not a brightness demon, and it may struggle a bit with direct, harsh sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.147.081
RTMA.250416.179
Image processor
mt5889 3GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips PUS8209 TV Panel details
Review Dreame S100 TV Panel details

TV features

4.7/10

5.9/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Poor
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    No
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    No
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips PUS8209 TV features
Review Philips PUS8209 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    No
  • Audio description
    No
    Yes

Philips PUS8209 uses the Titan OS operating system, which, while simple to use, remains limited in terms of functionality. The available number of applications is small compared to more developed ecosystems like Google TV, which may be disappointing for users accustomed to broader capabilities. Additionally, the lack of support for AirPlay restricts compatibility with Apple devices, reducing the flexibility of the television in streaming content. The remote, though interesting, requires aiming at the screen, which may not appeal to everyone.

The absence of more advanced features such as PiP (Picture-in-Picture) or program recording further limits the device's capabilities in everyday use.

Philips PUS8209 is a television that catches attention with its interesting feature of a three-sided Ambilight system, which is a dynamic backlighting of the wall behind the television that adjusts its colours and intensity to the content displayed on the screen. This effect creates the impression of greater image depth and enhances immersion, especially in darkened rooms. Unfortunately, its potential is limited by the Titan OS operating system, which leaves much to be desired. The limited number of applications and the lack of support for popular features such as AirPlay can be a significant drawback for more demanding users. While Ambilight distinguishes this model from the competition, shortcomings in the operating system significantly affect the overall functionality of the television.

Smart TV: Google TV

Dreame S100 uses the Google TV operating system. This is great news for anyone looking for a television with access to almost all streaming apps on the market. The system itself runs quite smoothly, although it does experience slight stutters now and then – which is par for the course in most Chinese TVs with Google software. On board, we find almost every necessary Smart TV feature, including screen mirroring and voice search using Google Assistant. Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 lacks support for AirPlay, making it difficult for iPhone users to easily share content from their phones.

Television Features

Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 is not a television designed for traditional TV viewers. Aside from basic options like connecting headphones and a rather simple remote control equipped with a numeric keypad, there are practically no additional features to facilitate the daily viewing of traditional channels. The only pleasant and increasingly rare addition is the presence of a physical minijack headphone output. This allows for connecting older wired headphones or analogue audio sets.

Apps

6.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
No
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8/10

8.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the Philips PUS8209 performs well in everyday use. It smoothly handles Polish characters in subtitles and allows for adjustments to the colour and size of the font, which significantly enhances the comfort of using this feature. More demanding users may notice some limitations in the supported file formats, however, for most applications in everyday use, this player should be fully sufficient.

The built-in media player works well and handled most files we provided from our USB drive without any issues. However, there were times when the app experienced slight stutters, and selected movies or photos only loaded after a few seconds. If the factory player turns out to be not very intuitive or lacks advanced features, the Google TV system saves the day. You just need to go to the app store and install any external media playback program (e.g. VLC) that will resolve this issue.

Sound

5/10

8.3/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    84dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    No

The sound on the Philips PUS8209 can be described as average, typical for televisions in this price range. The 2x10 W speakers do not offer exceptional quality or depth; however, they are sufficient for everyday TV watching. On the plus side, it should be noted that there is a wide range of supported audio codecs, such as Dolby Atmos and DTS, which can significantly enhance audio quality when paired with external sound systems, like soundbars or home theatre setups.

The sound quality of the Dreame S100 is one of the biggest advantages of this model – it's really good. The TV is equipped with a 4.1.2 speaker system with a total power of 70 W. The sound is clear, with a noticeably defined bass, which is confirmed by our acoustic measurements. The large drivers positioned on the sides of the casing effectively widen the soundstage. As a result, we get a noticeably more spacious sound compared to standard 20-watt 2.0 systems. The device supports Dolby Atmos encoding, so we can easily play spatial audio tracks from streaming platforms without the need to purchase an external soundbar. Unfortunately, it lacks support for the DTS format – that's a downside, although it must be honestly admitted that this standard is increasingly being abandoned by most manufacturers. On the plus side, the audio connection options are good. The Dreame S100 can be easily connected to newer home theatres or soundbars via the HDMI eARC port or optical output. A nice and increasingly rare addition is the classic minijack headphone socket, which allows older audio sets to gain a new life.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

No acoustic data

84dBC (Max)

75dBC