Philips PUS8079 vs Sharp GP7

Direct compare

GP7265E / GP7465E / GP7765E

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

4.6

6.2

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.3

    6.5

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    4.9

    6.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.5

    5.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    6.0

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    5.7

  • Watching in bright light

    2.6

    5.3

  • Utility functions

    5.0

    5.8

  • Apps

    7.0

    10.0

  • Sound quality

    5.1

    6.6

Advantages

  • Unique Ambilight system

  • Great smoothness of tonal transitions

  • Low input lag values

  • Good built-in file player

  • Support for DTS sound

  • Google TV system – intuitive, sophisticated interface

  • Good HDR quality with Dolby Vision

  • Strong contrast

  • Decent brightness

  • Good image scaling

  • Gentle tonal transitions

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low display brightness

  • No Dolby Vision

  • IR remote - requires aiming at the screen

  • TitanOs system - limited number of apps

  • Average choice for gamers

  • No AirPlay

  • No recording / PiP feature

Our verdict

Philips PUS8079 is currently the cheapest model from the manufacturer, featuring multicolour Ambilight backlighting, which has a large following of fans. Operating on a tight budget for the device, this will certainly be a strength and a significant added value. However, when opting for such a budget, we must also consider some compromises that will be present in all TVs of this class. This television is primarily aimed at people who mainly watch television during the day. Why? The main reason is the contrast results, which, for a VA panel, were extremely low, as well as the television's luminance, hovering around 200 nits. Such brightness indicates that it will not be suitable for content with a wide colour palette, such as streaming platforms with the highest packages. However, it's also worth noting the positive aspects of the TV, as it would be unfair not to mention them. Notably, it has quite high tonal fidelity in materials that significantly exceed the capabilities of the television, as well as smooth gradation. The latter is the strongest point of the tested television, as it is practically hard to fault, and if we were to try, it would border on nitpicking. If we occasionally connect a console, we can expect low input lag, which facilitates comfortable, casual gaming. The contentious issue is the operating system itself. It is extremely simple, and for those who only need YouTube or Netflix, it will be perfectly adequate; however, in any other case, it may prove insufficient. So who is Philips PUS8079 for? Primarily for those looking for something that distinguishes the unit from others in this price range. And that something is certainly Ambilight.

Sharp GP7 is a TV that certainly has its strong points, but it also has a few drawbacks. Is it perfect? No, but at its price, it does a really decent job and will serve well as quite a nice choice in many homes. The biggest plus? The Google TV system. Here Sharp GP7 shows its class – we have an enormous selection of apps, probably the largest on the market. It doesn't matter if we want to watch Netflix, YouTube, or something less known – we’ll find everything in one place. Plus, the interface is simple and intuitive, and if we don’t feel like clicking, we can just say what we’re looking for to the remote, as it supports voice commands in Polish. Google TV is definitely something that elevates the value of this TV, as we don't feel like we're missing anything. It just works. When it comes to picture quality, it's also quite good. A brightness level of 500 nits combined with Dolby Vision does the job – movies look really solid for this price range. Colours, thanks to the PFS (QLED) coating, are vivid, and the contrast from the VA panel makes dark scenes have depth, and the whole picture just "comes alive". It’s not at a premium level, but for this price, you can’t really complain too much. It’s a good picture that will satisfy most users. Of course, there are also weaker sides. The TV struggles with dynamic scenes – sports or video games won't look perfect here. The 60 Hz panel and its response time cannot provide the highest fluidity. Additionally, the manufacturer mentions HDMI 2.1, but all we find here is the ALLM function. There's a lack of VRR, G-Sync, or other additions that could attract gamers.

To sum up – Sharp GP7 is a solid TV for everyday viewing of movies and series. It’s not for gamers or fans of sports broadcasts, but for universal use – absolutely. If we value access to a rich ecosystem of apps and good picture quality at a reasonable price, this model might be just right for us.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
4 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps

Where to buy

No links

No links

Contrast and black detail

4.3/10

5.8/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,550:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,150:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review Sharp GP7 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,250:1

Review Sharp GP7 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,450:1

Review Sharp GP7 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Sharp GP7 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Sharp GP7 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,000:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

The Philips PUS8079 television is equipped with a VA panel. It’s worth noting that the size we tested is 43", as this manufacturer often changes panels depending on the size. While this type of panel should provide at least decent blacks, since we are dealing with a very budget unit, the results are rather predictable. Results around 2300:1 are among the lowest for this type of panel. More advanced units achieve results 2-3 times better in this regard. However, the current state of affairs shouldn't overly surprise us, as we are dealing with a very, very budget device. We should also mention that in this case, we have direct backlighting (Direct), the only plus of which is the uniformity of lighting. Unfortunately, it has not been divided into any zones, which is not surprising given the low class of the device. On the positive side, we can note the light separation in the test from the movie "Oblivion".

Sharp GP7 uses a VA panel, which allows it to boast quite a decent contrast. In our measurements, we achieved around 5000:1, which is a solid result for this price range. For example, when watching bright, contrasting scenes in Oblivion, we did not have the impression that the lights were merging into a single blot. Clear boundaries between the different light sources are still visible. On the other hand, the lack of local dimming means that in dark areas of the image, blacks often take on blue tones. This is a phenomenon that did not surprise us, as it is difficult to expect absolute perfection in this area at this price point. However, it is worth keeping in mind if we expect the TV to deliver inky blacks rather than what we might experience during the test scene from Sicario 2.

HDR effect quality

2.7/10

5.5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 80.0%, Bt.2020: 59.0%
DCI P3: 95.2%, Bt.2020: 73.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

179 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

164 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Sharp GP7 Brightness measurement

Result

428 nit

Review Sharp GP7 Brightness measurement

Result

448 nit

Review Sharp GP7 Brightness measurement

Result

492 nit

Review Sharp GP7 Brightness measurement

Result

471 nit

Review Sharp GP7 Brightness measurement

Result

499 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

HDR luminance chart:

Sharp GP7

Philips PUS8079

The maximum brightness in content with a wide tonal range at 202 nits is extremely low and practically prevents watching movies and series on streaming platforms in the highest quality. It's worth mentioning that in this case, using the HDR format equipped with dynamic metadata won't help either. Why won't it help? Because the only such format implemented in the television is HDR10+, which is extremely unpopular, and films recorded in this format are scarce. It’s also worth noting that PUS8079 uses WLED backlighting, which unfortunately is not the best solution, resulting in coverage of only 80% of the wide DCI-P3 colour gamut. The effect of this reality is significantly less intense colours in HDR content.

In terms of HDR, Sharp GP7 can surprise us pleasantly. The maximum brightness of around 500 nits is the threshold at which the real advantages of high dynamic range begin to be visible. During our tests, we achieved stable values between 430 and 500 nits, which translated to a clearer distinction of elements in both bright and slightly darker scenes. Additionally, it has a DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage of about 95%, allowing for vibrant, visually pleasing colours. Of course, it isn't top-tier, but for this price range – a big plus.

Factory color reproduction

1.8/10

7.1/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode in terms of colour reproduction and fidelity to the director's vision was "Film". While it was the best of the predefined modes, it still had significant discrepancies between what the filmmaker wanted to convey and what the tested television displayed. In both SDR and HDR materials (though to a lesser extent in the latter), the white balance, which is the most fundamental element responsible for image purity, turned out to be somewhat of a repeat of the vibrant mode, with a blue tint reminiscent of what you see in retail displays. Moving directly to the SDR materials and what affects contrast, namely gamma, we see it being severely reduced. This leads to cutting off already minimal contrast resources and brightening the entire image. In the EOTF curve, responsible for the increase in brightness pace in HDR materials, we instead see a strong drop below the reference line, which, given the limited light output of the television, significantly impacted the perception of those contents, which were even more dimmed. We won’t separate the quality assessments of the colours themselves since, in both cases, they achieved astronomical deltaE values, being simply completely different from what they should be.

Out of the box, in movie mode, GP7 doesn't fare badly at all. In HD materials, we noticed slight disturbances in white balance - drops in red and blue that made the image take on a somewhat greenish hue. This is noticeable, for instance, on the faces of characters, which become less lifelike. The gamma is slightly brighter in places, resulting in less deep blacks. In 4K HDR content, a cooler, bluish tone also emerges, making the colours appear less natural. On the other hand, looking at it from a "straight out of the box" perspective, these settings aren't bad - a few minor adjustments will suffice, and with the help of special tools, we will try to improve them.

Color reproduction after calibration

4.8/10

7.5/10

Luckily, Philips implements advanced image correction tools in all of its TVs. SDR content has benefited the most here, and the huge deltaE errors have been significantly corrected, with both white balance and gamma being substantially reworked. While we can't say it's reference-quality image, it's definitely better, and you can watch a movie or series without causing a headache, especially for your eyes. Naturally, HDR materials, due to the very low luminance of the TV, could not be corrected to the same high degree as those with a standard colour palette, but we managed to roughly straighten out the EOTF curve and the white balance. Unfortunately, that was all we could squeeze out of our unit, although it's worth noting that each unit is different and has entirely different errors, whether minor or major.

Calibration really makes a difference in Sharp GP7. After making adjustments, we achieved a better white balance in HD content, and the colours started to look much more natural, with minimal deviations and no clear dominance of individual hues. In 4K HDR, the change isn't as spectacular, but it's still noticeable. The gamma has been brought to a more neutral level, although a slight boost in the brightest details on the screen is still evident. The inability to control dynamic tone mapping limits our manoeuvrability, but nonetheless, this is a significant step forward compared to the factory settings.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

9/10

It seems that the fluidity of tonal transitions will be the biggest plus of the tested television. Practically in every scene, they were at a very satisfactory level. The only moments where it is insufficient are around the blacks, but even in these areas, it is quite good, and overall it can still be rated very positively, especially considering the price of the tested device. A matter not related to the fluidity of tonal transitions, but well visible in the photos, is the noticeable backlight bleed in the corners. This is an issue with the artwork itself, but it's worth noting that these cheaper units may be more prone to visible effects.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is a strong point of GP7 Sharp. Colour shades flow smoothly, without distinct lines or blotches. Whether we were watching dynamic action scenes or calm, picturesque landscape shots, we did not encounter significant issues with so-called banding. Any potential shortcomings are subtle enough that most of us wouldn't even notice them. The only flaw is the average uniformity of backlighting, which can at times disrupt the perfect effect.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.3/10

7.1/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

We will return once again to the issue of tonal transitions, but in the context of overall image quality improvement. As we can observe in the photo on the left, the gradation enhancement feature works brilliantly. Furthermore, it offers several settings, and each of them, even the lowest, provides a beneficial effect, and, what’s more, does not soften the film grain effect. We will repeat once again that this feature is the biggest advantage of the tested television.

Secondly, we will look at image scaling. Here, the tested television performed worse. We can notice, above all, the strongly jagged fine details and the characteristic white glow around figures. We must not forget about the significant artificial sharpening of the image.

The TV can scale lower quality content quite well. Our test patterns were well reproduced, and although there was minimal banding with fine, delicate shapes (such as thin branches), it still looked satisfactory. Additionally, Sharp GP7 offers a “10-bit colour reproduction” feature to smooth tonal transitions in poor quality materials. It is useful, but at the cost of some details, so we recommend turning it on only when we're really watching something of poor quality.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.2/10

4.8/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Nie
Nie
BFI function 120Hz
Nie
Nie
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

This paragraph, unlike the others, will be extremely short. The reason for this situation is the lack of implementation of even the most basic motion smoothing function, which was to be expected given the price of the device. We also note that we are dealing with a VA panel, whose sharpness will not be the best under the sun. This type of panel is mainly associated with high contrast, which goes hand in hand with a relatively slow response time, as we can clearly read from the panel analysis results. As you can see, from the images captured in quick motion, the picture is blurred, typical for this type of panel. Although it may not be the ideal option, it can conditionally be used for watching sports, although one must keep in mind the less than optimal sharpness in motion. It's worth mentioning that movies will exhibit stuttering, as the television does not have any, not even the simplest, motion smoother.

With a 60 Hz panel and average response time, it's hard to expect miraculous smoothness. In dynamic tests, like the one with the “little green man”, it’s clear that the picture can blur and occasionally lose sharpness. For watching movies and series, this is acceptable, especially since you can use the motion smoother with three levels of adjustment. However, if we care about ultra-smooth sports broadcasts or super-responsive gameplay, we might feel a bit dissatisfied.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

3.4/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Tak (wysoki input lag)
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    No

Philips PUS8079 offers only the most basic support for gaming in the form of ALLM, VRR, and Game Bar. The most important information is that thanks to the implementation of the feature responsible for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, the image is actually quite smooth for this price range and does not 'tear' the image.

A slightly greater nod towards gamers is the introduction of the Game Bar, allowing for settings adjustments 'on the fly'. This means we won’t have to exit the game to make any changes to the image. Importantly, it hasn’t been stripped of options known from higher models. We can find features such as shadow enhancement for better visibility in shadows and a colour filter for players with visual impairments.

Let's not kid ourselves – GP7 Sharp is not a television for the most demanding console gamers. Yes, we have ALLM, which automatically switches the TV to low latency mode, but it lacks VRR or G-Sync. We also won't find any advanced menu to help adjust settings during gameplay. Dolby Vision in games? It's there, but with such a large input lag that it's hard to talk about comfort. If we play occasionally and don't aim for the highest standards, it can be managed, but tech enthusiasts will face disappointment.

Input lag

9.9/10

8.6/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
37 ms
1080p120
2160p60
14 ms
13 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
13 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Results of input lag measurements in Philips PUS8079 stand at a high level, regardless of the signal or resolution. All gamers will undoubtedly appreciate the efforts of the manufacturer, which allow a game running at 4K60Hz with HDR to have only 13 ms of lag, which is virtually unnoticeable even in online games.

When it comes to input lag, we have mixed feelings. In 4K, we achieve around 13 ms, which is a great result and is more than sufficient for most of us. Unfortunately, Dolby Vision raises it to a level that makes gaming practically impossible, and in Full HD, around 37 ms is already a noticeable value for those of us who prioritise quick reactions. It's best to utilise 4K if we're aiming for the highest responsiveness.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

5.7/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
14ms
13ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

After connecting the television to the computer and wanting to use it as a monitor, we can expect a low input lag of 14 ms, which is practically unnoticeable on the mouse-screen-eye line. Unfortunately, the readability of the fonts is at a very low level, which practically excludes the use of Philips PUS8079 as a monitor. Why? If you look closely at the photo of the grey text, you'll notice a phenomenon called dithering. It is clearly visible that not all subpixels are lit up on the adjacent pixels, whereas all should be active when displaying grey. Therefore, the text will be annoyingly blurry, effectively hindering work.

As a monitor for office work or browsing the internet, Sharp GP7 performs quite well. The Chroma 4:4:4 provides text clarity, although with very small fonts on a dark background, we noticed some minor issues. It's hard to recommend it for PC gaming due to the lack of advanced features and higher refresh rates, but for simple office work or watching movies in the evening – why not?

Viewing angles

3.8/10

3.3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
41%
71%

The biggest and most common flaw of VA panels is their viewing angles. This is particularly true for units lacking angle coatings, which would make a significant difference in this regard. Interestingly, the tested unit performed considerably better than, for example, the PML9009 we recently checked. Nevertheless, even a slight shift off-axis results in a strong degradation of colours and a drop in contrast.

In terms of viewing angles, we have the typical limitations of VA panels. If we sit centrally in front of the screen, everything looks good, but if you lean back too far, the colours and contrast begin to fade. This is nothing unusual for this type of panel, so it's worth being aware that when watching with a larger group, the extreme spots on the couch will have a worse view.

TV efficiency during daytime

2.6/10

5.3/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Słabe
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Sharp GP7: 427 cd/m2

Philips PUS8079: 192 cd/m2

In our test sequence, there was also a place to check the performance of the television during daytime viewing. In fact, we also suggest this operational scenario, considering the insufficient contrast. Returning to the point: the use of a satin finish yielded poor results, which, combined with the low luminance of the television across all models, effectively disqualifies it for viewing in a sunny room.

The satin matrix doesn’t eliminate reflections as effectively as we would like, so in a bright, highly sunlit room, we might see some glare. Fortunately, the television has quite decent brightness (around 430 cd/m²), which allows us to use it without covering the windows, as long as the sun isn't shining directly on the screen. In extremely sunlit interiors, it may be trickier, but in standard conditions, it’s still usable.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
White LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.012.161
RTM7.230903.178
Image processor
m7632 2gb ram

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity:

Philips PUS8079

Sharp GP7

TV features

5/10

5.8/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    Google TV
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • AirPlay
    No
    No
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    No
    Yes
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    No
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Infrared
    RF
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes

One cannot fail to mention the biggest distinguishing feature of the manufacturer's televisions. We are, of course, talking about the multicoloured Ambilight backlighting, which is placed on the back of the device and displays colours adjusted to what is happening on the screen, often allowing for an even greater immersive experience. The operating system responsible for the television's functioning is Philips' proprietary system charmingly named TitanOs. It is definitely more closed and limited in terms of application resources than the televisions from this manufacturer that are based on the GoogleTV system. Besides the lack of important applications, its closed nature also manifests itself in another way. We won't be able to do such basic things as scheduling recordings or recording to USB. Those using devices from Apple may also feel disappointed by the absence of AirPlay functionality, which allows for easy screen streaming. Fortunately, there is an option to connect a keyboard and mouse for smoother navigation through the television menu. It is worth mentioning that there is an option to connect headphones, but only wired ones. If we connect them, we can also play sound through the television's speakers. It is also worth adding that the control of the television is done over IR, rather than Bluetooth, which is quite inconvenient in these times.

In summary: TitanOs has quite a few "buts," especially when we are conscious users needing and using many streaming platforms. It is rather an option for those limiting themselves to the so-called holy trinity, namely Netflix, YouTube, and CDA.

Sharp GP7 operates on the Google TV system, which provides access to a rich library of applications and streaming services. Its main advantage is the clear interface that integrates content from various sources in one place, making it easy to search and manage. Voice control in Polish works perfectly, and with the remote that has a built-in microphone, we can quickly find the content we're interested in, such as movies, series, or music. Regular system updates ensure that Google TV stays current, adapting to new user needs and introducing additional features. It's a convenient and modern solution that makes using the TV intuitive and enjoyable.


Although Google TV is a strong point of the GP7, the other features of the television are not as impressive. It lacks the ability to record programs or picture-in-picture (PiP) mode, and Apple users may feel the absence of support for AirPlay. However, there is Miracast for Windows and Bluetooth, allowing the connection of headphones or a keyboard. This is a sufficient foundation for less demanding users, although those expecting more advanced features may feel unsatisfied. The Sharp GP7 mainly focuses on the smart capabilities offered by Google TV, leaving traditional solutions in the background.

Playing files from USB

8/10

9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The default media player built into Philips PUS8079 offers quite a wide range of features but also has its limitations. It plays practically all video formats, with the obvious exception of Dolby Vision and the less obvious .asf, which is not commonly encountered. However, there are issues such as the lack of support for the H.265 HEVC codec at high bitrate and handling of .sub files, which are fairly popular. When it comes to photos, the player performs adequately, but it lacks support for some popular resolutions and formats, such as HEIC, used on Apple devices. The player performs best with audio, where it can't be faulted. Unfortunately, due to system limitations, there is no option to expand its features, meaning we are left with what the manufacturer has provided.

The media player performs quite well, supporting most popular formats. The only minor downside is the inability to change the font colour in subtitles, although for some of us, that’s a detail. We can always install another player from the Google Play store and customise it to our own preferences.

Apps

7/10

10/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
OK
Kodi

Sound

5.1/10

6.6/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    5.1/10
    6.6/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    Yes
    No

The best thing that can be said about the sound system in Philips PUS8079 is that it is present. There is practically a lack of mid-tones and bass. Meanwhile, the high tones stand out in a rather unpleasant way. Interestingly, we find a complete set of the most important audio codecs here, including Dolby Atmos and DTS-HD Master Audio. Because of this, connecting our home theatre system will be merely a formality.

Despite collaborating with Harman Kardon, the speakers perform rather average. The sound is decent, but there's nothing in it that really surprises us. It doesn’t support DTS:X, however, Dolby Atmos is onboard, which, when combined with good material, can slightly enhance the experience. If we care about better audio quality, we will likely consider purchasing an external soundbar or audio system anyway.