Philips PUS8079 vs Samsung Q60D / Q67D / Q68D

Direct compare

Q60D / Q67D / Q68D

Info

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”85”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Tizen

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

4.6

6.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.3

    6.2

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    4.9

    6.0

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.5

    5.2

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    7.0

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    2.6

    6.0

  • Utility functions

    5.0

    7.3

  • Apps

    7.0

    9.3

  • Sound quality

    5.1

    6.2

Advantages

  • Unique Ambilight system

  • Great smoothness of tonal transitions

  • Low input lag values

  • Good built-in file player

  • Support for DTS sound

  • High native contrast

  • Handles sunny days well

  • Easy-to-use Tizen operating system

  • Low input lag

  • Interesting choice for casual gamers

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low display brightness

  • No Dolby Vision

  • IR remote - requires aiming at the screen

  • TitanOs system - limited number of apps

  • No Dolby Vision

  • No recording support

  • Will not play sound in DTS format

Our verdict

Philips PUS8079 is currently the cheapest model from the manufacturer, featuring multicolour Ambilight backlighting, which has a large following of fans. Operating on a tight budget for the device, this will certainly be a strength and a significant added value. However, when opting for such a budget, we must also consider some compromises that will be present in all TVs of this class. This television is primarily aimed at people who mainly watch television during the day. Why? The main reason is the contrast results, which, for a VA panel, were extremely low, as well as the television's luminance, hovering around 200 nits. Such brightness indicates that it will not be suitable for content with a wide colour palette, such as streaming platforms with the highest packages. However, it's also worth noting the positive aspects of the TV, as it would be unfair not to mention them. Notably, it has quite high tonal fidelity in materials that significantly exceed the capabilities of the television, as well as smooth gradation. The latter is the strongest point of the tested television, as it is practically hard to fault, and if we were to try, it would border on nitpicking. If we occasionally connect a console, we can expect low input lag, which facilitates comfortable, casual gaming. The contentious issue is the operating system itself. It is extremely simple, and for those who only need YouTube or Netflix, it will be perfectly adequate; however, in any other case, it may prove insufficient. So who is Philips PUS8079 for? Primarily for those looking for something that distinguishes the unit from others in this price range. And that something is certainly Ambilight.

The Q6 series from Samsung is the simplest line of QLED televisions from the Koreans for 2024. It stands out for its ease of use and several handy features. Thanks to the Tizen system found in the Q60D, we can easily switch between apps like Netflix and Prime Video, and everything runs quickly and smoothly. Using it doesn't require any special preparation – everything is intuitive. One of the cooler additions is the solar remote. It not only eliminates the need for battery changes but also allows you to control other devices, such as a decoder. This means you don't have to keep multiple remotes handy, which will be appreciated by anyone who values order in their living room. In terms of picture quality, the television performs really well in its class. The contrast is high enough that the image looks sharp even during darker scenes. In bright rooms, the TV handles itself without major issues – the screen is bright enough for the image to be clear during the day. Of course, the lack of Dolby Vision might be noticeable with HDR materials, but HDR10+ support is still a good alternative, especially at this price. The Q60D is also a good choice if you occasionally game on a console. Low input lag means the image reacts quickly to our actions, which is great for both dynamic action games and sports. The Game Bar feature is a simple way to quickly adjust settings without leaving the game, which will definitely be useful for many people. The design of the Q60D also scores points – its slim design looks good in the living room, doesn't take up much space and easily fits into various interior styles. In summary: This is certainly not a device that aspires to be the best television of all time, but it is definitely a model that is worth its relatively low price.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps

Where to buy

No links

No links

Contrast and black detail

4.3/10

6/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,550:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,150:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review Samsung Q60D / Q67D / Q68D Contrast and black detail

Result

5,650:1

Review Samsung Q60D / Q67D / Q68D Contrast and black detail

Result

6,500:1

Review Samsung Q60D / Q67D / Q68D Contrast and black detail

Result

5,850:1

Review Samsung Q60D / Q67D / Q68D Contrast and black detail

Result

5,850:1

Review Samsung Q60D / Q67D / Q68D Contrast and black detail

Result

5,400:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

The Philips PUS8079 television is equipped with a VA panel. It’s worth noting that the size we tested is 43", as this manufacturer often changes panels depending on the size. While this type of panel should provide at least decent blacks, since we are dealing with a very budget unit, the results are rather predictable. Results around 2300:1 are among the lowest for this type of panel. More advanced units achieve results 2-3 times better in this regard. However, the current state of affairs shouldn't overly surprise us, as we are dealing with a very, very budget device. We should also mention that in this case, we have direct backlighting (Direct), the only plus of which is the uniformity of lighting. Unfortunately, it has not been divided into any zones, which is not surprising given the low class of the device. On the positive side, we can note the light separation in the test from the movie "Oblivion".

The Samsung Q60D television is equipped with a VA panel, which provides deeper blacks and higher contrast compared to IPS/ADS panels. VA panels are characterised by their better ability to display deep blacks, so if we're looking for an LED display for night viewing, this type of panel shouldn't disappoint us. In contrast tests, the television showed a result of around 6000:1, which can be considered a decent result, providing satisfactory visual experiences in most scenes. In more challenging scenes, like that from the film Oblivion, the television handles light separation well, adding detail and depth. However, in scenes with more demanding lighting compositions, like that from the film Sicario 2, the limitations resulting from the absence of local dimming technology are noticeable. Black elements of the image tend to resemble navy blue. Despite this phenomenon, the Q60D offers truly decent contrast.

HDR effect quality

2.7/10

5.5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 80.0%, Bt.2020: 59.0%
DCI P3: 90.0%, Bt.2020: 69.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

179 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

164 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Samsung Q60D / Q67D / Q68D Brightness measurement

Result

527 nit

Review Samsung Q60D / Q67D / Q68D Brightness measurement

Result

530 nit

Review Samsung Q60D / Q67D / Q68D Brightness measurement

Result

524 nit

Review Samsung Q60D / Q67D / Q68D Brightness measurement

Result

531 nit

Review Samsung Q60D / Q67D / Q68D Brightness measurement

Result

537 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: HDR10+

HDR luminance chart:

Samsung Q60D / Q67D / Q68D

Philips PUS8079

The maximum brightness in content with a wide tonal range at 202 nits is extremely low and practically prevents watching movies and series on streaming platforms in the highest quality. It's worth mentioning that in this case, using the HDR format equipped with dynamic metadata won't help either. Why won't it help? Because the only such format implemented in the television is HDR10+, which is extremely unpopular, and films recorded in this format are scarce. It’s also worth noting that PUS8079 uses WLED backlighting, which unfortunately is not the best solution, resulting in coverage of only 80% of the wide DCI-P3 colour gamut. The effect of this reality is significantly less intense colours in HDR content.

Television Samsung Q60D, regardless of the tested scene, achieves brightness levels above 500 nits, which is above average for this class of devices. Such a level of brightness allows for a taste of true home cinema, with clearly visible details in bright areas of the image and well-rendered contrast dynamics, especially when watching content from streaming platforms or films played from Blu-ray. This means that movie screenings gain greater depth and realism, particularly in well-lit scenes. Despite the use of quantum dot technology (QLED), the television does not achieve outstanding results in colour reproduction. The coverage of the DCI-P3 colour space is only 90%, which may be noticeable in more demanding scenes, where the richness and saturation of colours play a key role in image quality.

Factory color reproduction

1.8/10

6.5/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode in terms of colour reproduction and fidelity to the director's vision was "Film". While it was the best of the predefined modes, it still had significant discrepancies between what the filmmaker wanted to convey and what the tested television displayed. In both SDR and HDR materials (though to a lesser extent in the latter), the white balance, which is the most fundamental element responsible for image purity, turned out to be somewhat of a repeat of the vibrant mode, with a blue tint reminiscent of what you see in retail displays. Moving directly to the SDR materials and what affects contrast, namely gamma, we see it being severely reduced. This leads to cutting off already minimal contrast resources and brightening the entire image. In the EOTF curve, responsible for the increase in brightness pace in HDR materials, we instead see a strong drop below the reference line, which, given the limited light output of the television, significantly impacted the perception of those contents, which were even more dimmed. We won’t separate the quality assessments of the colours themselves since, in both cases, they achieved astronomical deltaE values, being simply completely different from what they should be.

Samsung has been offering a "Filmmaker" mode in its TVs for several years now, aimed at providing the most faithful picture settings straight from the factory, in line with the vision of filmmakers. This is certainly a big step towards cinematic quality at home, but it is worth noting that this mode is not without its issues.

For example, the white balance in both SDR and HDR modes exhibits an excessive amount of red, which makes the image too warm. As a result, the skin tones of actors and bright scenes can appear unnaturally flushed. The Colour Checker test further confirms this problem – colour samples often shift towards red hues, deviating from the neutral colour representation that would be more desirable in a professional setup.

When it comes to contrast, there is a noticeable strong drop at the beginning of the gamma graph, where values below 2.4 drop all the way down to 2.1. As a result, the image in darker scenes may appear less distinct, losing depth. In the case of HDR content, the EOTF curve (which is responsible for brightness reproduction) shows a strong spike at the beginning of the graph, which can lead to excessive brightness in the lighter parts of the image, disrupting the natural tonal balance.

Color reproduction after calibration

4.8/10

8/10

Luckily, Philips implements advanced image correction tools in all of its TVs. SDR content has benefited the most here, and the huge deltaE errors have been significantly corrected, with both white balance and gamma being substantially reworked. While we can't say it's reference-quality image, it's definitely better, and you can watch a movie or series without causing a headache, especially for your eyes. Naturally, HDR materials, due to the very low luminance of the TV, could not be corrected to the same high degree as those with a standard colour palette, but we managed to roughly straighten out the EOTF curve and the white balance. Unfortunately, that was all we could squeeze out of our unit, although it's worth noting that each unit is different and has entirely different errors, whether minor or major.

After professional calibration of the Samsung Q60D television in film mode, users can enjoy a significant improvement in image quality. Samsung televisions have always offered 2- and 20-point grayscale adjustment and an advanced CMS (Colour Management System), allowing for precise colour and shade adjustments. The white balance for both SDR and HDR has been stripped of strong peaks and tendencies towards colour drifting into red tones, significantly enhancing the naturalness of the image. Although a few larger errors can still be observed in HDR mode, the overall quality of colour reproduction has been excellently improved. Regarding contrast, although drastic changes cannot be said due to the limitations of the television's technology, the improvement is noticeable. Thanks to calibration, details in dark scenes are more visible, and the differences between light and dark elements of the image have been enhanced. This makes the overall perception of the image more satisfying, allowing viewers to enjoy greater depth and realism in the displayed content.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

7/10

It seems that the fluidity of tonal transitions will be the biggest plus of the tested television. Practically in every scene, they were at a very satisfactory level. The only moments where it is insufficient are around the blacks, but even in these areas, it is quite good, and overall it can still be rated very positively, especially considering the price of the tested device. A matter not related to the fluidity of tonal transitions, but well visible in the photos, is the noticeable backlight bleed in the corners. This is an issue with the artwork itself, but it's worth noting that these cheaper units may be more prone to visible effects.

Samsung Q60D offers decent performance, making it an attractive choice for movie and gaming enthusiasts. The gradation of bright colours is definitely a strong point of this model, making brighter scenes appear exceptionally natural and smooth. Although with darker transitions the colour blending is somewhat more noticeable, the overall effect is still satisfactory. The television handles tonal transitions well, providing viewers with visual experiences that enhance movie nights and gaming sessions. With these qualities, the Samsung Q60D won't spoil our film screenings.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.3/10

5.4/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

We will return once again to the issue of tonal transitions, but in the context of overall image quality improvement. As we can observe in the photo on the left, the gradation enhancement feature works brilliantly. Furthermore, it offers several settings, and each of them, even the lowest, provides a beneficial effect, and, what’s more, does not soften the film grain effect. We will repeat once again that this feature is the biggest advantage of the tested television.

Secondly, we will look at image scaling. Here, the tested television performed worse. We can notice, above all, the strongly jagged fine details and the characteristic white glow around figures. We must not forget about the significant artificial sharpening of the image.

However, when it comes to processing and scaling lower quality materials, the television performs quite well. The image is rendered without overscan, which ensures full use of the available screen space. Additionally, the outlines of the model or branches of the tree are not overly jagged, resulting in a satisfactory quality of the displayed content. Although noise reduction could be more effective, the overall processing results of lower quality materials are positive and meet expectations.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.2/10

4.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Nie
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
BFI function 120Hz
Nie
Nie
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
46%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

This paragraph, unlike the others, will be extremely short. The reason for this situation is the lack of implementation of even the most basic motion smoothing function, which was to be expected given the price of the device. We also note that we are dealing with a VA panel, whose sharpness will not be the best under the sun. This type of panel is mainly associated with high contrast, which goes hand in hand with a relatively slow response time, as we can clearly read from the panel analysis results. As you can see, from the images captured in quick motion, the picture is blurred, typical for this type of panel. Although it may not be the ideal option, it can conditionally be used for watching sports, although one must keep in mind the less than optimal sharpness in motion. It's worth mentioning that movies will exhibit stuttering, as the television does not have any, not even the simplest, motion smoother.

Samsung Q60D is equipped with a 60 Hz panel and a feature to enhance movie smoothness, known as "Motion Blur Reduction." This function aims to minimise motion blur and improve overall image fluidity, which will certainly appeal to users who primarily seek a television for watching movies and series. Thanks to this technology, viewers can enjoy a more fluid visual experience, even in dynamic action scenes where details are crucial. However, it is worth noting that while "Motion Blur Reduction" improves image fluidity in films, for gaming, this panel may not be the best choice due to its considerable motion blur effect, which can be seen in the photo below.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

4.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Philips PUS8079 offers only the most basic support for gaming in the form of ALLM, VRR, and Game Bar. The most important information is that thanks to the implementation of the feature responsible for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, the image is actually quite smooth for this price range and does not 'tear' the image.

A slightly greater nod towards gamers is the introduction of the Game Bar, allowing for settings adjustments 'on the fly'. This means we won’t have to exit the game to make any changes to the image. Importantly, it hasn’t been stripped of options known from higher models. We can find features such as shadow enhancement for better visibility in shadows and a colour filter for players with visual impairments.

Samsung Q60D has been equipped with features such as ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode), HGiG (HDR Gaming Interest Group) and Game Bar, which significantly enhance the gaming experience. However, the lack of HDMI 2.1 implementation limits its capabilities, preventing the use of VRR (Variable Refresh Rate), which could further improve smoothness and image quality. Generally, for casual gamers, this TV should perform well in everyday use, providing satisfactory gaming experiences. However, if we are more demanding in terms of gaming, it is worth considering models with a higher refresh rate and HDMI 2.1, which will ensure full functionality and better support for the latest games. In such cases, investing in a more advanced TV will yield significantly better results in terms of smoothness and image quality, which is crucial for gaming enthusiasts.

Input lag

9.9/10

9.9/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
15 ms
1080p120
2160p60
14 ms
15 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
12 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Results of input lag measurements in Philips PUS8079 stand at a high level, regardless of the signal or resolution. All gamers will undoubtedly appreciate the efforts of the manufacturer, which allow a game running at 4K60Hz with HDR to have only 13 ms of lag, which is virtually unnoticeable even in online games.

When it comes to input lag, the Samsung Q60D TV does not disappoint in this aspect. With results around 15 ms, the television offers truly impressive responsiveness. Such low input lag means that reactions to commands from the controller are immediate, resulting in a better gaming experience, especially in dynamic titles that require precise movements.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
14ms
15ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

After connecting the television to the computer and wanting to use it as a monitor, we can expect a low input lag of 14 ms, which is practically unnoticeable on the mouse-screen-eye line. Unfortunately, the readability of the fonts is at a very low level, which practically excludes the use of Philips PUS8079 as a monitor. Why? If you look closely at the photo of the grey text, you'll notice a phenomenon called dithering. It is clearly visible that not all subpixels are lit up on the adjacent pixels, whereas all should be active when displaying grey. Therefore, the text will be annoyingly blurry, effectively hindering work.

When it comes to working on a PC, the Samsung Q60D television offers very good font readability, regardless of the background it is displayed on. Thanks to support for the 4:4:4 chroma format, text is clear and sharp, which is important when using office applications or browsing the internet. Additionally, a low input lag of 15 ms means that responses are immediate, significantly improving user comfort during work or gaming on a computer. However, the television has a 60Hz panel and does not support G-Sync functionality, which could satisfy PC gamers.

Viewing angles

3.8/10

3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
41%
74%

The biggest and most common flaw of VA panels is their viewing angles. This is particularly true for units lacking angle coatings, which would make a significant difference in this regard. Interestingly, the tested unit performed considerably better than, for example, the PML9009 we recently checked. Nevertheless, even a slight shift off-axis results in a strong degradation of colours and a drop in contrast.

Samsung Q60D is equipped with a VA panel. The viewing angles are not its strongest point; when we watch the picture from the side, we may notice colour distortions and a drop in brightness. However, VA panels stand out with good black reproduction, which translates to deeper and more intense movie scenes.

TV efficiency during daytime

2.6/10

6/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Słabe
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

Samsung Q60D / Q67D / Q68D: 542 cd/m2

Philips PUS8079: 192 cd/m2

In our test sequence, there was also a place to check the performance of the television during daytime viewing. In fact, we also suggest this operational scenario, considering the insufficient contrast. Returning to the point: the use of a satin finish yielded poor results, which, combined with the low luminance of the television across all models, effectively disqualifies it for viewing in a sunny room.

Samsung Q60D is equipped with a satin matrix, which manages glare reduction moderately. Although the matrix does not eliminate it completely, its high brightness level of 550 nits ensures that the picture remains clear even in bright lighting conditions. This makes watching television during the day still comfortable, with details being well visible, making this model a suitable choice for those using the television in daylight.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
White LED
QLED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.012.161
1120
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity:

Philips PUS8079

Samsung Q60D / Q67D / Q68D

TV features

5/10

7.3/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    Tizen
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    No
    Yes
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    No
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Infrared
    RF
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes

One cannot fail to mention the biggest distinguishing feature of the manufacturer's televisions. We are, of course, talking about the multicoloured Ambilight backlighting, which is placed on the back of the device and displays colours adjusted to what is happening on the screen, often allowing for an even greater immersive experience. The operating system responsible for the television's functioning is Philips' proprietary system charmingly named TitanOs. It is definitely more closed and limited in terms of application resources than the televisions from this manufacturer that are based on the GoogleTV system. Besides the lack of important applications, its closed nature also manifests itself in another way. We won't be able to do such basic things as scheduling recordings or recording to USB. Those using devices from Apple may also feel disappointed by the absence of AirPlay functionality, which allows for easy screen streaming. Fortunately, there is an option to connect a keyboard and mouse for smoother navigation through the television menu. It is worth mentioning that there is an option to connect headphones, but only wired ones. If we connect them, we can also play sound through the television's speakers. It is also worth adding that the control of the television is done over IR, rather than Bluetooth, which is quite inconvenient in these times.

In summary: TitanOs has quite a few "buts," especially when we are conscious users needing and using many streaming platforms. It is rather an option for those limiting themselves to the so-called holy trinity, namely Netflix, YouTube, and CDA.

Samsung Q60D runs on the proprietary Tizen operating system, which, although not as open as Google's system and having certain limitations regarding available applications, should satisfy most users. The interface is clear and intuitive, allowing easy access to popular streaming platforms such as Netflix, YouTube, and Prime Video. Users will also appreciate the ability to personalise the home screen, enabling quick jumps to favourite apps and content. However, the lack of recording functionality may be a concern for those who would like to archive their favourite shows or movies for later. On the other hand, a pleasant surprise is the presence of AirPlay functionality, which allows seamless content streaming from Apple devices, such as iPhone or iPad. This means users can easily share photos, videos, and other materials without the need for cables.

Additionally, the television allows the connection of various peripheral devices via Bluetooth, significantly increasing its functionality. Users can take advantage of wireless headphones, soundbars, and other accessories, enhancing comfort during use. The remote control included with the television is slim, elegant, and ergonomic. It is equipped with an internal battery that can be charged via a USB-C port or solar energy, providing a convenient solution that eliminates the need for battery replacements. Moreover, it allows for controlling other devices such as an external NC+ / Canal + decoder.

Furthermore, the SmartThings app for smartphones and iPhone enables the integration of the television with other smart devices in the home. This allows users to remotely control various elements of their home, such as Philips Hue smart lighting, Yeelight, and other products compatible with this system. The Samsung Q60D becomes the central point in a smart home, enabling easy management of daily tasks and entertainment.

Playing files from USB

8/10

9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
No
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The default media player built into Philips PUS8079 offers quite a wide range of features but also has its limitations. It plays practically all video formats, with the obvious exception of Dolby Vision and the less obvious .asf, which is not commonly encountered. However, there are issues such as the lack of support for the H.265 HEVC codec at high bitrate and handling of .sub files, which are fairly popular. When it comes to photos, the player performs adequately, but it lacks support for some popular resolutions and formats, such as HEIC, used on Apple devices. The player performs best with audio, where it can't be faulted. Unfortunately, due to system limitations, there is no option to expand its features, meaning we are left with what the manufacturer has provided.

The built-in player in the Samsung Q60D TV is one of its significant advantages. It handles most video and audio files used during testing exceptionally well. The only exceptions are the Dolby Vision format, which is not surprising, and less popular codecs. It’s also worth noting the support for Polish characters and the ability to change font colours, enhancing user comfort.

Apps

7/10

9.3/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi

Sound

5.1/10

6.2/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    5.1/10
    6.2/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    Yes
    No

The best thing that can be said about the sound system in Philips PUS8079 is that it is present. There is practically a lack of mid-tones and bass. Meanwhile, the high tones stand out in a rather unpleasant way. Interestingly, we find a complete set of the most important audio codecs here, including Dolby Atmos and DTS-HD Master Audio. Because of this, connecting our home theatre system will be merely a formality.

When it comes to sound, due to the slim design of the Samsung Q60D TV, the audio quality is at an acceptable level, although it doesn’t stand out in any particular way. A positive aspect is the soundbar synchronisation feature thanks to Q-Symphony technology, which allows for a better audio experience. Unfortunately, in terms of audio codec support, there is a significant issue – the TV does not support the DTS format.