Philips PUS8079 vs LG UT8100 (IPS)

Direct compare

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”75”86”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

4.6

6.0

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.3

    5.3

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    4.9

    5.4

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.5

    5.7

  • Gaming on console

    6.2

    6.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    2.0

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    2.6

    4.6

  • Utility functions

    5.0

    8.3

  • Apps

    7.0

    9.7

  • Sound quality

    5.1

    6.0

Advantages

  • Unique Ambilight system

  • Great smoothness of tonal transitions

  • Low input lag values

  • Good built-in file player

  • Support for DTS sound

  • Good viewing angles

  • Intuitive WebOS system with wide access to applications

  • Magic Remote

  • Suitable for occasional gaming - low input lag, ALLM, HGiG

  • USB recording function from built-in tuners

  • Smooth image scaling – good reproduction of lower resolution materials

Disadvantages

No like
  • Low display brightness

  • No Dolby Vision

  • IR remote - requires aiming at the screen

  • TitanOs system - limited number of apps

  • Average brightness - 350 nits

  • Terrible contrast

  • No Dolby Vision

Our verdict

Philips PUS8079 is currently the cheapest model from the manufacturer, featuring multicolour Ambilight backlighting, which has a large following of fans. Operating on a tight budget for the device, this will certainly be a strength and a significant added value. However, when opting for such a budget, we must also consider some compromises that will be present in all TVs of this class. This television is primarily aimed at people who mainly watch television during the day. Why? The main reason is the contrast results, which, for a VA panel, were extremely low, as well as the television's luminance, hovering around 200 nits. Such brightness indicates that it will not be suitable for content with a wide colour palette, such as streaming platforms with the highest packages. However, it's also worth noting the positive aspects of the TV, as it would be unfair not to mention them. Notably, it has quite high tonal fidelity in materials that significantly exceed the capabilities of the television, as well as smooth gradation. The latter is the strongest point of the tested television, as it is practically hard to fault, and if we were to try, it would border on nitpicking. If we occasionally connect a console, we can expect low input lag, which facilitates comfortable, casual gaming. The contentious issue is the operating system itself. It is extremely simple, and for those who only need YouTube or Netflix, it will be perfectly adequate; however, in any other case, it may prove insufficient. So who is Philips PUS8079 for? Primarily for those looking for something that distinguishes the unit from others in this price range. And that something is certainly Ambilight.

LG UT8100 is a model that doesn’t try to pretend to be more than it is. Simple, functional, and performing well for everyday use. Its biggest advantage is the WebOS system – intuitive, fast, and rich in applications. With such support, using Netflix or YouTube is hassle-free, and navigating the menu takes just a moment. The Magic remote adds even more convenience, as it works a bit like a mouse – just point at the screen and click what you want. Voice control in Polish? It works flawlessly, and we can confidently say that it is the best when it comes to our native language. One of the more interesting features is the ability to record to USB. It seems like a small thing, but it can be useful if we don’t always have time to watch a programme live. Surprisingly, the TV also handles scaling of lower-quality materials well – standard TV channels look decent. It’s also suitable for gaming, though rather for those who are not hardcore gamers. Thanks to the low input lag and features like ALLM and HGiG, gaming is smooth, and the image is responsive enough. Sure, the 60 Hz panel doesn’t allow for miracles, but it’s more than enough for occasional sessions. Of course, UT8100 isn’t for demanding movie lovers. The lack of Dolby Vision and HDR10+ means HDR content doesn’t look as good as it could. Brightness and contrast are also rather average, especially evident in the evenings during dark scenes – blacks aren’t deep, causing details to easily get lost. LG UT8100 is a solid TV for those looking for simple equipment for everyday use. It has a convenient system, functional remote, and a few useful options, like recording to USB. If we’re not concerned about the highest image quality and are looking for something to watch television, this model will work quite well.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps

Where to buy

No links

No links

Contrast and black detail

4.3/10

1.9/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,750:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,550:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,150:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review Philips PUS8079 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,350:1

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,100:1

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

1,050:1

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

The Philips PUS8079 television is equipped with a VA panel. It’s worth noting that the size we tested is 43", as this manufacturer often changes panels depending on the size. While this type of panel should provide at least decent blacks, since we are dealing with a very budget unit, the results are rather predictable. Results around 2300:1 are among the lowest for this type of panel. More advanced units achieve results 2-3 times better in this regard. However, the current state of affairs shouldn't overly surprise us, as we are dealing with a very, very budget device. We should also mention that in this case, we have direct backlighting (Direct), the only plus of which is the uniformity of lighting. Unfortunately, it has not been divided into any zones, which is not surprising given the low class of the device. On the positive side, we can note the light separation in the test from the movie "Oblivion".

The LG UT8100 television is equipped with an IPS panel, which unfortunately fails to provide satisfactory contrast and black levels. In the tested scenes, such as from the movie Sicario 2, the black resembles more of a silvery ash than a deep pitch. The lack of local dimming causes details in the darker areas of the image to merge, and the screen looks quite dull in poorly lit rooms. For users seeking deep blacks and vivid contrast, the IPS panel in this model will be a disappointment. In this category, the television performs very poorly.

HDR effect quality

2.7/10

3.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 80.0%, Bt.2020: 59.0%
DCI P3: 82.0%, Bt.2020: 60.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

179 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

177 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

164 nit

Review Philips PUS8079 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

285 nit

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

238 nit

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

326 nit

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

205 nit

Review LG UT8100 (IPS) Brightness measurement

Result

319 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

Static HDR10

HDR luminance chart:

LG UT8100 (IPS)

Philips PUS8079

The maximum brightness in content with a wide tonal range at 202 nits is extremely low and practically prevents watching movies and series on streaming platforms in the highest quality. It's worth mentioning that in this case, using the HDR format equipped with dynamic metadata won't help either. Why won't it help? Because the only such format implemented in the television is HDR10+, which is extremely unpopular, and films recorded in this format are scarce. It’s also worth noting that PUS8079 uses WLED backlighting, which unfortunately is not the best solution, resulting in coverage of only 80% of the wide DCI-P3 colour gamut. The effect of this reality is significantly less intense colours in HDR content.

The LG UT8100 television unfortunately does not meet expectations in the HDR effect category. A peak brightness of only 300 nits on the luminance chart is well below the required value to fully enjoy HDR effects. In practice, the image resembles SDR quality more than true HDR, which is particularly evident in demanding high-contrast scenes. The coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette is only 82%, which further limits the ability to present vibrant and rich colours. Instead of impressive visual experiences, we receive a muted and washed-out image. For those looking for a television to fully utilise HDR content, the LG UT8100 model turns out to be quite disappointing.

Factory color reproduction

1.8/10

5.5/10

Factory Mode

After calibration

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode in terms of colour reproduction and fidelity to the director's vision was "Film". While it was the best of the predefined modes, it still had significant discrepancies between what the filmmaker wanted to convey and what the tested television displayed. In both SDR and HDR materials (though to a lesser extent in the latter), the white balance, which is the most fundamental element responsible for image purity, turned out to be somewhat of a repeat of the vibrant mode, with a blue tint reminiscent of what you see in retail displays. Moving directly to the SDR materials and what affects contrast, namely gamma, we see it being severely reduced. This leads to cutting off already minimal contrast resources and brightening the entire image. In the EOTF curve, responsible for the increase in brightness pace in HDR materials, we instead see a strong drop below the reference line, which, given the limited light output of the television, significantly impacted the perception of those contents, which were even more dimmed. We won’t separate the quality assessments of the colours themselves since, in both cases, they achieved astronomical deltaE values, being simply completely different from what they should be.

The Filmmaker Mode on LG UT8100, while theoretically the best for watching movies, has significant issues. The biggest problem is the white balance – drops in blue cause a noticeable yellowing of the image, visible in both HD and 4K content. These issues are confirmed by measurement results in the Colour Checker test, which indicate significant deviations in colour reproduction.

In terms of brightness characteristics, both HD and 4K content exhibit a large tonal boost. The gamma curve in both cases remains well below the reference value of 2.4, which leads to excessive brightening of darker elements of the image. A similar problem is evident in the EOTF curve – in the case of 4K content, the TV struggles to manage brightness correctly, resulting in issues with screen brightness. This means the factory settings of this model require significant adjustment to achieve better picture quality.

Color reproduction after calibration

4.8/10

8/10

Luckily, Philips implements advanced image correction tools in all of its TVs. SDR content has benefited the most here, and the huge deltaE errors have been significantly corrected, with both white balance and gamma being substantially reworked. While we can't say it's reference-quality image, it's definitely better, and you can watch a movie or series without causing a headache, especially for your eyes. Naturally, HDR materials, due to the very low luminance of the TV, could not be corrected to the same high degree as those with a standard colour palette, but we managed to roughly straighten out the EOTF curve and the white balance. Unfortunately, that was all we could squeeze out of our unit, although it's worth noting that each unit is different and has entirely different errors, whether minor or major.

After calibrating the Filmmaker Mode, the gamma has been aligned to practically perfect, reference values, which has significantly improved the overall tonal characteristics in HD content. 4K HDR content also looks better, although some issues are still visible at the extreme ends of the graph, where the curve deviates from the ideal. The EOTF curve performs worse since the TV struggles to maintain the correct brightness values. As a result, the image in some scenes may be too bright or slightly dim, which stems from the device’s design. Nevertheless, the calibration brought significant improvement, particularly for HD content, where the tonal balance and colour reproduction are now at a much higher level.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.5/10

9/10

It seems that the fluidity of tonal transitions will be the biggest plus of the tested television. Practically in every scene, they were at a very satisfactory level. The only moments where it is insufficient are around the blacks, but even in these areas, it is quite good, and overall it can still be rated very positively, especially considering the price of the tested device. A matter not related to the fluidity of tonal transitions, but well visible in the photos, is the noticeable backlight bleed in the corners. This is an issue with the artwork itself, but it's worth noting that these cheaper units may be more prone to visible effects.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in LG UT8100 is at a very high level. The colour gradation is nearly perfect, and the transitions between shades are smooth and free of visible seams. This is definitely one of the strong points of this model. Unfortunately, attention is drawn to the unevenness of the panel's backlighting, which can be noticeable in more homogeneous scenes, especially in the darker parts of the image. Although the gradation itself performs excellently, the inconsistencies of the panel slightly detract from the overall impression of quality.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.3/10

7.3/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

Image without overscan on the SD signal

We will return once again to the issue of tonal transitions, but in the context of overall image quality improvement. As we can observe in the photo on the left, the gradation enhancement feature works brilliantly. Furthermore, it offers several settings, and each of them, even the lowest, provides a beneficial effect, and, what’s more, does not soften the film grain effect. We will repeat once again that this feature is the biggest advantage of the tested television.

Secondly, we will look at image scaling. Here, the tested television performed worse. We can notice, above all, the strongly jagged fine details and the characteristic white glow around figures. We must not forget about the significant artificial sharpening of the image.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is also correct, although the effect depends on the settings. The update improved the operation of the smooth gradation function, smoothing transitions better than before, but introduced minor issues with detail loss, e.g. on textures.

Image scaling on LG UT8100 performs very well. The image presents itself decently, with no major issues regarding edge aliasing. Details are preserved at a satisfactory level, making materials of lower resolution look really solid on this television. As a result, users can enjoy watching older content without any noticeable defects in quality.

Blur and motion smoothness

4.2/10

4.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
No
BFI function 60Hz
Nie
Nie
BFI function 120Hz
Nie
Nie
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
0%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

This paragraph, unlike the others, will be extremely short. The reason for this situation is the lack of implementation of even the most basic motion smoothing function, which was to be expected given the price of the device. We also note that we are dealing with a VA panel, whose sharpness will not be the best under the sun. This type of panel is mainly associated with high contrast, which goes hand in hand with a relatively slow response time, as we can clearly read from the panel analysis results. As you can see, from the images captured in quick motion, the picture is blurred, typical for this type of panel. Although it may not be the ideal option, it can conditionally be used for watching sports, although one must keep in mind the less than optimal sharpness in motion. It's worth mentioning that movies will exhibit stuttering, as the television does not have any, not even the simplest, motion smoother.

LG UT8100, equipped with a 60 Hz panel, is particularly suited for those watching movies. The television offers the TruMotion system with a de-judder effect adjustment, which allows users to tailor the smoothness of the picture – from more choppy to exceptionally smooth, resembling a soap opera effect, depending on user preferences.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

4.7/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    No
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    No
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Philips PUS8079 offers only the most basic support for gaming in the form of ALLM, VRR, and Game Bar. The most important information is that thanks to the implementation of the feature responsible for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, the image is actually quite smooth for this price range and does not 'tear' the image.

A slightly greater nod towards gamers is the introduction of the Game Bar, allowing for settings adjustments 'on the fly'. This means we won’t have to exit the game to make any changes to the image. Importantly, it hasn’t been stripped of options known from higher models. We can find features such as shadow enhancement for better visibility in shadows and a colour filter for players with visual impairments.

LG UT8100 offers basic features for gamers, such as ALLM and Game Bar, which makes it easier to access settings. The TV also supports HGiG, improving picture quality in HDR games. Unfortunately, the lack of support for Dolby Vision and VRR limits the device's capabilities, as does the 60 Hz panel, which excludes support for 120 Hz resolution. This model is more suited for less demanding gaming applications.

Input lag

9.9/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
14 ms
10 ms
1080p120
2160p60
14 ms
10 ms
2160p120

HDR

2160p60
14 ms
10 ms
2160p120
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
2160p120 DV

Results of input lag measurements in Philips PUS8079 stand at a high level, regardless of the signal or resolution. All gamers will undoubtedly appreciate the efforts of the manufacturer, which allow a game running at 4K60Hz with HDR to have only 13 ms of lag, which is virtually unnoticeable even in online games.

LG UT8100 achieves an impressively low input lag of 10 ms, which is a great result, especially for gamers. This TV provides quick response and smooth gameplay experience, even in fast-paced games.

Compatibility with PC

2/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (maximum resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Poor
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, maximum refresh rate)
14ms
10ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
60Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
No
No

After connecting the television to the computer and wanting to use it as a monitor, we can expect a low input lag of 14 ms, which is practically unnoticeable on the mouse-screen-eye line. Unfortunately, the readability of the fonts is at a very low level, which practically excludes the use of Philips PUS8079 as a monitor. Why? If you look closely at the photo of the grey text, you'll notice a phenomenon called dithering. It is clearly visible that not all subpixels are lit up on the adjacent pixels, whereas all should be active when displaying grey. Therefore, the text will be annoyingly blurry, effectively hindering work.

LG UT8100 is well-suited as a monitor for work thanks to support for chroma 4:4:4, which ensures very good text readability, regardless of the background. When it comes to gaming, the TV offers a 60 Hz panel and low input lag, making it suitable for less demanding applications. Unfortunately, the lack of support for features such as G-Sync limits its capabilities in more advanced gaming scenarios.

Viewing angles

3.8/10

6.3/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
41%
64%

The biggest and most common flaw of VA panels is their viewing angles. This is particularly true for units lacking angle coatings, which would make a significant difference in this regard. Interestingly, the tested unit performed considerably better than, for example, the PML9009 we recently checked. Nevertheless, even a slight shift off-axis results in a strong degradation of colours and a drop in contrast.

Thanks to the use of an IPS panel, LG UT8100 offers quite good viewing angles. The picture remains clear and doesn't lose too much quality even when viewed from the side. Colours are well preserved, and brightness and contrast decrease in a noticeable but moderate way. This is particularly important in rooms where viewers are seated at different angles to the screen. In this category, the TV performs solidly, standing out against models with VA panels.

TV efficiency during daytime

2.6/10

4.6/10

Matrix coating
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Słabe
Average
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Matrix brightness

Average luminance SDR

LG UT8100 (IPS): 345 cd/m2

Philips PUS8079: 192 cd/m2

In our test sequence, there was also a place to check the performance of the television during daytime viewing. In fact, we also suggest this operational scenario, considering the insufficient contrast. Returning to the point: the use of a satin finish yielded poor results, which, combined with the low luminance of the television across all models, effectively disqualifies it for viewing in a sunny room.

LG UT8100 is equipped with a satin matrix coating that does a moderate job of reducing reflections. A brightness level of 350 cd/m² is adequate for moderate lighting conditions, such as a typical living room. However, in very bright rooms, the television may struggle to maintain image readability, especially on sunny days. It will perform best in environments where lighting can be partially controlled.

Details about the matrix

Backlight Type
White LED
White LED
Software version during testing
TPN246E_V246.004.012.161
23.20.65
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity:

Philips PUS8079

LG UT8100 (IPS)

TV features

5/10

8.3/10

  • System
    Titan OS
    WebOS
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    Yes
  • Recording programming
    No
    Yes
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • AirPlay
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
  • Possibility to connect Bluetooth headphones to the TV
    No
    Yes
  • Possibility to simultaneously use Bluetooth headphones and the TV speaker
    No
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • RF remote control (no need to aim at the screen)
    Infrared
    RF
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes

One cannot fail to mention the biggest distinguishing feature of the manufacturer's televisions. We are, of course, talking about the multicoloured Ambilight backlighting, which is placed on the back of the device and displays colours adjusted to what is happening on the screen, often allowing for an even greater immersive experience. The operating system responsible for the television's functioning is Philips' proprietary system charmingly named TitanOs. It is definitely more closed and limited in terms of application resources than the televisions from this manufacturer that are based on the GoogleTV system. Besides the lack of important applications, its closed nature also manifests itself in another way. We won't be able to do such basic things as scheduling recordings or recording to USB. Those using devices from Apple may also feel disappointed by the absence of AirPlay functionality, which allows for easy screen streaming. Fortunately, there is an option to connect a keyboard and mouse for smoother navigation through the television menu. It is worth mentioning that there is an option to connect headphones, but only wired ones. If we connect them, we can also play sound through the television's speakers. It is also worth adding that the control of the television is done over IR, rather than Bluetooth, which is quite inconvenient in these times.

In summary: TitanOs has quite a few "buts," especially when we are conscious users needing and using many streaming platforms. It is rather an option for those limiting themselves to the so-called holy trinity, namely Netflix, YouTube, and CDA.

LG UT8100 runs on the WebOS system, which is characterised by its intuitiveness and extensive features. The Magic Remote, equipped with voice command support in Polish, further simplifies navigation. The TV offers access to virtually all popular apps, such as Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, and Amazon Prime Video, making it an excellent multimedia hub.

In terms of usability features, the TV meets most expectations. We find all the necessary TV tuners and the ability to record to USB, allowing for the saving of favourite programmes. It’s easy to connect a keyboard, headphones, or other devices via Bluetooth. Unfortunately, the lack of PiP (picture in picture) functionality may be a minor disappointment, although it’s not surprising at this price point.

Daily use of LG UT8100 is pure pleasure – the simplicity of operation and versatility of features mean it performs excellently as both a home TV and a multimedia device.

Playing files from USB

8/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
No
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
No
24 Mpix
No
No
28 Mpix
No
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The default media player built into Philips PUS8079 offers quite a wide range of features but also has its limitations. It plays practically all video formats, with the obvious exception of Dolby Vision and the less obvious .asf, which is not commonly encountered. However, there are issues such as the lack of support for the H.265 HEVC codec at high bitrate and handling of .sub files, which are fairly popular. When it comes to photos, the player performs adequately, but it lacks support for some popular resolutions and formats, such as HEIC, used on Apple devices. The player performs best with audio, where it can't be faulted. Unfortunately, due to system limitations, there is no option to expand its features, meaning we are left with what the manufacturer has provided.

LG UT8100 handles most popular video and audio formats well, making it a versatile multimedia device. Although it lacks support for Apple's HEIC photo format, it still offers satisfactory functionality. Notably, the support for Polish characters in subtitles and the ability to change the font colour allow users to customise the displayed text to their preferences. In this category, the television performs really well.

Apps

7/10

9.7/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
No
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Viaplay
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
MAX
No
Kodi

Sound

5.1/10

6/10

  • Subjective sound quality:
    5.1/10
    6/10
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1:
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1:
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC):
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA:
    Yes
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio:
    Yes
    No

The best thing that can be said about the sound system in Philips PUS8079 is that it is present. There is practically a lack of mid-tones and bass. Meanwhile, the high tones stand out in a rather unpleasant way. Interestingly, we find a complete set of the most important audio codecs here, including Dolby Atmos and DTS-HD Master Audio. Because of this, connecting our home theatre system will be merely a formality.

The sound on LG UT8100 is basic and doesn’t stand out in any particular way. It's sufficient for everyday TV watching, but when it comes to more demanding content like movies or concerts, it may lack depth and dynamism. If we care about better sound quality, it will be necessary to connect an external audio system, such as a soundbar or home theatre. The built-in speakers do their job, but they won’t impress more discerning users.