Philips PUS7000 vs Philips OLED950

Direct comparison

OLED950 / OLED+

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Available screen sizes: 65”77”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

5.3

8.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    4.8

    8.8

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    5.7

    8.8

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    4.9

    8.5

  • Gaming on console

    6.5

    9.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.8

    6.5

  • Watching in bright light

    3.5

    7.3

  • Utility functions

    5.0

    6.5

  • Apps

    6.7

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    5.8

    8.2

Advantages

  • Attractive price

  • High contrast VA panel

  • Very low input lag

  • Gaming features – presence of VRR, ALLM, and a dedicated Game Bar

  • Supports HDR10+

  • Quite decent image processing (for such a cheap TV)

  • Good readability of fonts – suitable as a large monitor

  • Backlit remote with numeric keypad

  • Amazing peak brightness, exceeding 2000 nits on test panels (Tandem OLED matrix)

  • Perfect black and infinite contrast

  • Support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision and HDR10+

  • Excellent gaming features: supports 4K@120Hz, VRR, ALLM, and 144 Hz mode

  • Very low input lag

  • Impressive, 4-sided Ambilight system

  • Google TV system offering access to a vast library of apps

  • Backlit remote, charging via USB-C connector

Disadvantages

No like
  • Very low brightness – 200 nits

  • No Ambilight

  • Lack of any features to improve fluidity makes the image feel very "raw"

  • Titan OS system – the interface is slow, lacking many popular applications

  • The remote works on infrared

  • Only two HDMI ports in standard 2.1

  • Remote control communicating via infrared (requires aiming at the receiver)

  • Very high price compared to market competition

  • Sound quality noticeably weaker than in the lower model OLED910

  • Slight issues with posterisation

Our verdict

If you're looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, the price is pretty much it. This model is primarily meant to be cheap, and it fulfills that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally upgrade to 4K without emptying the wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget 60 Hz" model, Philips hasn't forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which realistically improve the gaming experience when connected to a console and make everything quite responsive. But... indeed. The biggest problem with this TV is its brightness, or rather the lack thereof. 200 nits is a figure that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The picture will be pale and not very clear despite the fact that it features a high-contrast VA panel. HDR is essentially just a label on the box here. With such a dim panel, HDR materials look artificial and simply lack the necessary punch, so it's better to forget about them and stick to standard SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 doesn’t drastically stand out from the other budget screens. The question is whether you'll get along with the Titan OS system, which is still a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard with competitors. Given today's prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are churning out QLEDs and Mini-LEDs like there’s no tomorrow, the Philips PUS7000 faces a really tough battle. If you value the logo of a well-known brand and a low price: you can go ahead. However, if you’re looking for picture quality... it’s better to double-check your budget before making a purchase.

Philips OLED950 is undoubtedly a technological showcase that redefines many aspects of what we can expect from a home entertainment centre. The use of the groundbreaking Tandem OLED panel brings us to the absolute peak in terms of image quality. The combination of infinite black and perfect contrast with brightness that can exceed the magical barrier of 2000 nits in HDR mode produces effects that are, at times, breathtaking. Whether we’re watching movies in a sunlit lounge or gaming at night with the support of a four-sided Ambilight system, the experience is simply phenomenal. It’s a complete screen that will satisfy both the cinema enthusiast seeking fidelity in Dolby Vision, and the gamer demanding 144 Hz and perfect motion response.

However, this awe for the raw performance of the panel is mixed with a sense of inadequacy when we consider the manufacturer's promises regarding image processing. Philips has heavily promoted the use of the "dual" P5 processor, suggesting that it would be a remedy for all the woes of digital signal processing. However, reality proved to be less revolutionary. In our tests, the difference compared to models equipped with the standard, single P5 chip was nearly imperceptible in everyday use. Issues with the smoothness of tonal transitions and posterization in difficult scenes, although rare, still occur. Considering the astronomical price of this model, we expected a significantly greater qualitative leap in this aspect that would justify such high positioning of the equipment. The question of value for money becomes the biggest problem for this otherwise outstanding television. When we look at the market with a cool eye, the situation for the 950 model becomes complicated. It’s not just about the strong competition from cheaper flagships like the LG G5 or Samsung S95F, but also about the "fratricidal" battle within Philips' own offerings. It turns out that the lower positioned OLED910 model offers us practically the same, brilliant image generated by the identical panel. Moreover, the 910 model outshines in audio, offering an integrated soundbar from Bowers & Wilkins, which is simply missing in the more expensive 950 model due to a different design. We are thus faced with a paradox: we get the same image and inferior sound, but we have to pay significantly more. Therefore, although the OLED950 is a fantastic screen, in 2025 the title of "Best Philips Television" and our recommendation goes to the model OLED910.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Premium
Stand type
Legs
Legs
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.9/10

10/10

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

4,950:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,550:1

Review Philips PUS7000 Contrast and black detail

Result

5,150:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review Philips OLED950 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

The model PUS7000 we tested, measuring 55 inches, is equipped with a VA panel. This is crucial for black quality, as in such budget constructions, we won't find local dimming systems that could assist the screen in dark scenes. Therefore, all the work relies on the panel itself, which, thanks to its characteristics, offers decent contrast at a level of 6000:1. In practice, this translates to significantly better experiences during evening viewings compared to competing TVs with IPS panels. The blacks here are better separated from bright elements, so dark parts of the image don’t appear washed out, and details in the shadows remain visible. However, it’s worth noting that with completely turned off lights, the black may slightly lean towards shades of navy blue and won't be as perfectly “pitch-black” as in more expensive models. To mitigate this effect and improve the perception of depth, it’s advisable to watch the TV with some light, additional illumination in the room. Usually, this problem was somewhat resolved by the well-known Ambilight system in Philips TVs, which optically increases contrast through the glow on the wall. Unfortunately, in the PUS7000 model, the manufacturer opted to seek savings, which is why we won’t find this lighting system here, which is standard in higher series like PUS8000.

There’s no need to elaborate here. Like every OLED TV, the Philips OLED950 has perfect black levels and contrast. Regardless of the film scene being watched, whether it's night shots or materials in a 2.39:1 aspect ratio with black bars, you can count on flawless black without any blooming or brightening. This is one of the biggest advantages of OLED technology over LCD and Mini-LED TVs. There are no local dimming algorithm games or compromises here. Black always remains black. The only thing that can be noticed in our tests is the scene with the helicopter from Sicario 2. The OLED950 quite clearly accentuates details in the shadows. However, this is a feature of our test unit, more related to the character of the image reproduction than the quality of black itself. In this regard, everything here is at the highest level.

HDR effect quality

3.3/10

8.7/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 78.3%, Bt.2020: 57.1%
DCI P3: 99.7%, Bt.2020: 82.4%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

202 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

197 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

209 nit

Review Philips PUS7000 Brightness measurement

Result

230 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1910 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2084 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2194 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

2179 nit

Review Philips OLED950 Brightness measurement

Result

1370 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: HDR10+

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips OLED950

Philips PUS7000

Luminance of RGB colors

Unfortunately, the PUS7000 is not suitable for watching HDR content. This screen is simply too dark. A brightness level of 200 nits is insufficient to display this format correctly. Even if a HDR signal message appears on the screen, the image will resemble a standard SDR recording. Therefore, it’s better to stick with the latter format to avoid errors in displaying bright scenes, as you will read below. The situation is worsened by the fact that this is a classic LCD model without additional layers that improve colours, such as QLED or PFS. As a result, colours in HDR may seem washed out. Ultimately, this provides a worse effect than in the standard SDR format, which is simply better suited to the capabilities of this panel.

OLED950 is a phenomenal TV for consuming content in HDR format, primarily thanks to the use of innovative Tandem OLED technology. With this technology, the screen can generate astronomical brightness levels, reaching over 2000 nits in movie scenes (on test patterns). This is an outstanding result that places the OLED950 model among the elite displays available on the market. However, it is worth noting a specific aspect of this solution – at moments when full-screen flashes of light appear, brightness can drop by as much as half. Nonetheless, it is important to highlight that levels above 1000 nits on a full screen are still an outstanding result. This allows HDR content to be displayed exactly as filmmakers intended, maintaining the dynamics and impact of bright scenes.

The use of Tandem OLED technology also brought tangible benefits in terms of colour reproduction, improving elements that traditional WOLED panels had issues with compared to QD-OLED competition. In the case of the OLED950, the colour gamut coverage is wider than in classic WOLED panels, reaching nearly 100% of the DCI-P3 colour space and a solid 82% of the demanding BT.2020 palette. While these results still do not match the highly refined achievements of QD-OLED panels, the difference becomes less noticeable during real-world use. We cannot deny that in the vast majority of films, colours look simply fantastic on this model – they are saturated, vibrant, and full of depth.

Factory color reproduction

5.3/10

5.5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

We tested the television in movie mode, which theoretically should provide the best and most natural colours. And indeed, this mode is quite correct; however, when we connected the calibration equipment, its biggest flaw became apparent. The PUS7000 has significant shortcomings in displaying reds. Poorly tuned white balance and too low saturation of this colour cause the image to appear too cool. As a result, one might get the impression that the displayed content lacks vibrant colours. The situation is worsened by the fact that both SDR and HDR content are excessively brightened. This is confirmed by the gamma curve and EOTF graphs, which show that the television displays the image brighter than it should. This causes scenes to lose their depth and can make them seem slightly washed out. Fortunately, in the Philips menu, we find plenty of features to improve these aspects, so we immediately proceeded to calibration to see what we could extract from this screen.

We tested the OLED950 model in Film mode. Although it is intended to be the best and most accurate preset on this television, in practice, it proved to be not without flaws. Interestingly, in the specimen we tested, the biggest challenge was not the white balance itself – although it did show a slight tendency to give the image a pinkish tint. The main issue lay in the way the television managed brightness, both in everyday SDR content and in demanding HDR scenes. Analysis of the gamma chart and the EOTF curve leads to one key conclusion: the television excessively exposes brightness in the lower registers. This results in the image appearing less contrasty than what the panel technology allows. Details in dark areas, which should remain perfectly dimmed (the characteristic "OLED black"), are simply unnecessarily highlighted and brightened. Fortunately, these errors can be corrected using the appropriate tools, so – as always – we proceeded with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

9.4/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After professional calibration, it’s evident that the PUS7000 responds well to image adjustments. In this price range, that’s not a given. The effects are best evaluated in two scenarios, depending on the content we plan to watch. SDR performs the best. After our adjustments, the image looks really good. Most colour errors have dropped below level 3, which is the threshold at which discrepancies usually become visible to the naked eye. Movies, series, sports, and regular television present naturally, without unpleasant deviations. If someone mainly watches classic channels or streams in HD quality, the difference after calibration will be noticeable straight away. However, it must be said clearly that the PUS7000 is still not a television suited for proper HDR, and calibration doesn't change much in this regard. The reason lies in the hardware: colours remain too unsaturated. The television lacks solutions that widen the colour gamut, such as PFS filters or a quantum dot layer, so the panel simply cannot display the intense colours required by HDR. This is most evident in reds, which still look washed out. This limitation cannot be circumvented through menu settings, as it stems from the design of the backlighting and the panel itself.

As you can see, the OLED950, after a professional calibration process, becomes an absolutely phenomenal display that, without a shadow of a doubt, can be placed alongside the best televisions currently available in the world. This equipment needed only a professional touch to showcase its full potential and eliminate factory shortcomings. The residual errors in the Color Checker tests and the fidelity of the colour palette speak for themselves. We are dealing with an almost perfect device here. A true window to the world, offering image quality of the highest order.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

6/10

7.1/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

When it comes to colour gradation in bright scenes, the PUS7000 model performs surprisingly well. It's hard to have any major complaints here. The colour transitions are natural and smooth, which means there are no disturbing bands or jumps between shades on a bright background. During the viewing of cheerful scenes, nothing should distract your attention from the screen. However, the situation changes dramatically when darker shades of grey or simply very dark colours appear on the screen. Unfortunately, quite strong "banding" of colours becomes noticeable then. Instead of smooth transitions, we get distinct breaks between the individual tones. In dark, atmospheric films, this can be quite annoying and detract from the viewing experience, as the tonal transitions are not as clean as in the bright areas of the image.

If we had to point out the weaker point of the OLED950 model compared to market competitors like the G5 and S95F, it would be – as with most TVs from this manufacturer – the digital signal processing. Although the processor used here is referred to as a "dual" one, our tests in practice did not show significant changes compared to the lower positioned OLED910 model. The differences are actually minimal, which only reflected in a slight cosmetic increase in rating in this category. In very demanding, especially dark scenes, one can still occasionally notice issues with slight posterization. However, it should be clearly stated that this is a "flaw" that the average viewer will very rarely notice during normal usage, and the overall reception remains at a high level.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

6.5/10

7.1/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The PUS7000 handles digital image processing quite well. The distortion reduction feature deserves praise, as it effectively smooths unwanted tonal transitions even at a low setting. However, it has its downside: with too aggressive operation, it can introduce undesirable artifacts on the screen. It would be a good idea to experiment with this setting to find the golden mean between a smooth image and the clarity of details.

The upscaling, or enhancing the quality of lower materials to 4K, is decent. The image after processing is very "soft," which is typical of almost all Philips TVs. The edges are plastic and smooth, making the image look cohesive. If someone finds it too soft, it can always be adjusted with the sharpness slider in the menu for a more pronounced effect.

Upscaling

In terms of the scaling of the image, the proprietary P5 processor performs just as well as in most of the manufacturer's models. Lower resolution content gains a very soft and plastic character. This presentation will certainly appeal to many people. However, if you prefer sharper contours, you can gently enhance them using the appropriate slider in the TV menu. In this aspect, it's really hard to nitpick. The image simply looks very good and additionally, there are no issues with overscan.

Smoothing and Distortion Reduction

The smoothing of tonal transitions performs somewhat worse. In the settings, we find an option called "Distortion Reduction." This allows for a three-level adjustment of the processor's intervention. Unfortunately, the Minimum setting works poorly and the smoothing effects are minimal. The Medium level gives a decent result, but it also begins to smooth out the details of the actors' skin. On the other hand, the Maximum setting works too aggressively. It removes far too many details from the face and background elements or can even eliminate film grain. To achieve the optimal effect, it's worth playing around with these settings at home and adjusting them to your liking. It might seem that the Medium option represents the best compromise here.

Blur and motion smoothness

3.9/10

8.5/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
No
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

In this regard, we actually have no good news. It might seem that the biggest downside is the lack of a 120 Hz panel, but in this price range, that's actually the norm, and it's hard to expect more. However, the worst part is that the television has no motion smoothing features. There are no supporting systems in place for either movies or sports. We have to come to terms with the fact that the image on the PUS7000 is processed "raw." This means that during dynamic scenes or fast camera movements, motion can appear choppy or unclear. We have no option to enable any smoothers that could alleviate this effect.

The motion reproduction on the OLED950 model is simply perfect. This is typical for screens of this kind (OLED 120Hz+), as the panel shows no motion blur at all. This allows us to enjoy perfect sharpness in practically any conditions. A significant part of this is due not only to the nature of organic technology itself. Equally important work is done here by the smoothing systems employed by the manufacturer.

Console compatibility and gaming features

4.7/10

9.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    No
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

Even though the PUS7000 isn’t marketed as a gaming TV, it doesn't perform as poorly in this category as one might expect. True, it doesn't support 120 Hz refresh rates, which is understandable at this price point, but the manufacturer has included several important features that significantly improve the console gaming experience. The most important of these are VRR and ALLM technologies. VRR is responsible for synchronising the screen with the number of frames generated by the console. This means the image doesn't "tear" and remains consistent even during sudden drops in frame rates while playing. On the other hand, ALLM is a solution that automatically switches the TV to a mode with the lowest latency immediately after detecting a signal from the console. All these parameters are easily accessible thanks to the Game Bar feature. This is a special control panel for gamers that can be brought up on the screen at any time. It allows for a quick view of current settings and connection status without interrupting gameplay, which is a very convenient solution.

OLED950 is almost the perfect television for gamers. This is due not only to the unique atmosphere created by the Ambilight system during gameplay. The most important aspect here is the solid hardware support. We literally have everything you would expect from a modern gaming display. The manufacturer has implemented two HDMI 2.1 ports with full bandwidth of 48 Gb/s. This gives us access to gaming in 4K resolution at 120 frames per second. There is, of course, support for VRR technology and the automatic game mode ALLM. The device handles any HDR signal with ease, whether we’re using Dolby Vision or the HGiG standard.

We have access to all settings from one place thanks to the special Game Bar overlay. While this interface may not be the most graphically attractive on the market, it fully accomplishes its task. It displays all the important signal parameters and offers useful additions. Gamers can take advantage of the minimap zoom function or add a fixed crosshair on the screen, which can be seen as a small aid in online competition. The adjustment of contrast range also proves to be useful. It allows you to brighten shadows and achieve better visibility of enemies hiding in dark corners of the map.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
12 ms
12 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
12 ms
12 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
12 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
12 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

Another plus for gamers is the very low input lag at around 12 ms. In this price range, the result is impressive. The delay is so minimal that the response to controller movements feels instantaneous, and in practice, it’s hard to notice at all. Gaming remains comfortable even in fast, dynamic titles where every millisecond counts. In this respect, the PUS7000 can keep up with much more expensive televisions.

According to what we have come to expect from TVs in this segment, the signal delay in this model is practically negligible. Our measurements indicated nearly reference values: just 5 ms at 120 Hz refresh rate and 12 ms for the 60 Hz signal. This means an instantaneous response to every command issued via the controller, mouse, or keyboard. With such low results, the only limitation during dynamic online gameplay remains your own reflexes and lack of "skill," rather than the hardware. 😉

Compatibility with PC

5.8/10

6.5/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
12ms
5ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BWRG
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

When it comes to connecting a computer, the possibilities for gaming are quite limited. The screen supports a maximum of 60 Hz and does not offer G-Sync technology, so it’s not equipment for demanding PC gamers. However, the PUS7000 surprisingly performs well for text work. The readability of fonts is at a very high level. The television correctly handles 4:4:4 chroma subsampling. This means that each letter, regardless of its size or colour, is displayed sharply and without any distortion on the edges. As a result, office work or browsing the internet on this screen is simply comfortable and doesn’t strain the eyes like some cheap panels that struggle with clean font rendering.

In this category, the situation looks quite specific. If we look at the OLED950 through the eyes of a gamer, we get a phenomenal display. It performs excellently not only with consoles but also when connected to a powerful computer. We have access here to an additional 144 Hz mode, full support for G-Sync and FreeSync technology, and very low signal latency. One could risk saying that for PC gamers, this is an almost ideal monitor.

However, problems arise when we examine the readability of fonts. We are not only referring to the unusual subpixel arrangement of the WOLED panels (BWRG), which causes specific edge discoloration of text in all televisions of this type. The tested model struggles with correctly displaying Chroma 4:4:4 sampling. This is mainly noticeable when we display coloured text on another colourful background. The letters then gain strange shading, unnatural contours, and unwanted artifacts. It’s a bit of a shame, although we must honestly admit that this is a very specific flaw. For 99% of you, no one is likely to notice this during normal entertainment. However, if you belong to that 1% of people planning to purchase the OLED950 strictly as a monitor for office work, you may feel disappointed.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

7.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
70%
29%

The viewing angles on this model are weak, which is directly due to the use of a VA-type panel. Although this panel provides decent contrast, as I mentioned earlier, it has one major flaw: it requires you to sit directly in front of the screen. Just shifting slightly to the side is enough for the colours to start losing saturation, and the image becomes noticeably worse.

As befits organic technology, the viewing angles here are practically very good. We can enjoy a great image no matter where on the couch we look at the screen. The only caveat arises when directly comparing the Tandem OLED matrix used here with the competitors' solutions. Compared to last year's LG panels equipped with the MLA filter or the best QD-OLED screens from Samsung, the angles in the OLED950 are slightly weaker. They are not quite as perfect as those of the mentioned rivals. Nevertheless, they generally still maintain a very high level, and in everyday use, it’s hard to consider this a downside.

Daytime performance

3.5/10

7.3/10

Panel finish
Satin
Glare
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

Philips OLED950: 615 cd/m2

Philips PUS7000: 202 cd/m2

In a sunny room, the PUS7000 performs poorly. This is due to the fact that the display is simply too dim. A brightness level of 200 nits is very low, which does not allow for comfortable viewing in a lot of daylight. On the plus side, the satin screen coating does a decent job of reducing reflections. Thanks to this, reflections are not overly noticeable on the display, but it's not enough to save the situation. The brightness of this model is too low to cut through strong sunlight, so in very bright rooms, the image will simply be quite unclear.

The OLED950 model performs exceptionally well in really bright rooms without any concerns. A key advantage here is the previously mentioned very high brightness of the panel. Considering it's OLED technology, the performance is impressive. One could confidently say that in this regard, this television can compete with mid-range Mini-LED models. In the world of organic panels, this is not such a given, which is a significant plus for the device being tested.

However, there is one drawback that could be termed as its Achilles' heel. Similar to most Tandem OLED panels, the manufacturer has applied a glossy screen coating here. Unfortunately, it doesn't handle direct light reflections very well. It's worth bearing this in mind when planning the placement of the television in relation to windows, as reflections may be noticeable.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
Software version during testing
TPN256E_V056.002.236.141
Image processor
MT5896

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review Philips PUS7000 TV Panel details
Review Philips OLED950 TV Panel details

TV features

5/10

6.5/10

  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    2 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    No
    No
  • Recording programming
    No
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    Yes
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    No
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    No
    No
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips PUS7000 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features
Review Philips OLED950 TV features

Titan OS System

Titan OS is still a fairly new operating system, and unfortunately, this is noticeable in everyday use. The whole system operates sluggishly, at times even clumsily. The response to commands from the remote is slow, which is further complicated by the fact that the device uses infrared connectivity instead of Bluetooth / RF. This means we need to aim the remote fairly precisely at the television for the system to respond at all. During testing, we again failed to launch the screen mirroring feature with computers running Windows. Fortunately, transmitting video from Apple devices via AirPlay worked without any issues. Another downside of Titan OS is its very modest app library. The selection is much smaller than in systems like webOS or Tizen, not to mention Google TV, where the choice of programs is almost unlimited.

Classic Features

On the other hand, the PUS7000 might be a good choice for people who primarily watch traditional television. Here, we find a properly functioning teletext and a clear EPG interface, which is an electronic program guide. The remote included is backlit, which makes it very handy to use after dark, and it features standard numeric buttons for quick channel selection. An interesting addition is the presence of a classic jack headphone input. This is a rarely seen feature in new televisions, allowing for the connection of older home theatre systems or wired headphones without the need to purchase adapters.

Smart Features

The biggest plus of the OLED950 is the Google TV system — the manufacturer is increasingly moving away from it in cheaper models in favour of TitanOS, but here we thankfully still have a fully-fledged Android-based environment. This means access to a vast library of apps, a voice assistant, and convenient features like Chromecast. For unknown reasons, we were once again unable to activate Windows Miracast in the editorial office, despite the manufacturer declaring this option is available. On the plus side: Apple device users can sleep easy, as the TV supports AirPlay.

Classic Features

In terms of “classics,” the TV offers a rather basic set: teletext and Bluetooth connectivity. The biggest complaints revolve around the remote. On one hand, it is sensibly designed with backlighting, “hybrid” switching between typical functions and the numeric keypad, and charging via USB-C. On the other hand, enthusiasm quickly wanes when it turns out that you need to aim it at the screen, as it operates on infrared.

Apps

6.7/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
No
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.2/10

9.5/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
Yes
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
No
Yes
12 Mpix
No
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
No
Yes
24 Mpix
No
Yes
28 Mpix
No
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player works quite well and handles most popular video formats without any major issues. The television easily reads subtitles from files and manages various audio formats, so those who keep movies on a drive or USB shouldn't feel restricted. The only hitch concerns the photo browser – not everything worked properly, and some files, especially in selected resolutions, did not open at all.

The built-in media player in the OLED950 model works exceptionally well. During our tests, the device handled practically every format we threw at it. Whether they were video files, audio tracks, or photos, the TV played them without any issues. It's hard to find any weaknesses in its support for the most popular standards. However, if someone still finds something lacking (which seems unlikely), the operating system comes to the rescue. Thanks to the presence of Google TV, we are not solely reliant on the default solutions. At any time, you can enter the app store and install an external player, such as the popular VLC or Kodi. This ensures that the TV can handle literally any file from our home library.

Sound

5.8/10

8.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    85dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The sound is pretty much at a budget level. It's sufficient for news and talk shows, but with films and music, it quickly lacks depth and bass. At this price, it's hard to expect much more, so if we’re after better experiences, it’s worth considering a soundbar or connecting external audio, even just through the headphone jack.

The speaker setup here is a 2.1 system with a total power of 70 W, which offers a solid dose of quality sound. It plays clearly, and thanks to the additional subwoofer at the back of the enclosure, the sound is deep and has a distinct punch. This element is often lacking in cheaper models, where the bass is practically non-existent. However, we must face the truth when comparing it to the OLED910 model. That television, equipped with a built-in Bowers & Wilkins soundbar, simply performs much better. Was it a good decision? In our opinion, the outstanding audio of the 910 model provides greater value. Choosing the 950 model makes sense mainly if you are big fans of Ambilight, and you’ve got the sound issue sorted out with an external home theatre or soundbar.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

No acoustic data