If you're looking for a specific reason to buy the Philips PUS7000, the price is pretty much it. This model is primarily meant to be cheap, and it fulfills that role perfectly. It could be a decent choice for someone who is still using an old Full HD screen and wants to finally upgrade to 4K without emptying the wallet. Interestingly, even though this is a "budget 60 Hz" model, Philips hasn't forgotten about gamers. We get VRR and ALLM, which realistically improve the gaming experience when connected to a console and make everything quite responsive. But... indeed. The biggest problem with this TV is its brightness, or rather the lack thereof. 200 nits is a figure that makes the PUS7000 simply capitulate on a sunny day. The picture will be pale and not very clear despite the fact that it features a high-contrast VA panel. HDR is essentially just a label on the box here. With such a dim panel, HDR materials look artificial and simply lack the necessary punch, so it's better to forget about them and stick to standard SDR. Is it worth buying? At this price, every manufacturer makes similar compromises, so the PUS7000 doesn’t drastically stand out from the other budget screens. The question is whether you'll get along with the Titan OS system, which is still a bit raw and lacks many apps that are standard with competitors. Given today's prices, where Chinese brands like TCL and Hisense are churning out QLEDs and Mini-LEDs like there’s no tomorrow, the Philips PUS7000 faces a really tough battle. If you value the logo of a well-known brand and a low price: you can go ahead. However, if you’re looking for picture quality... it’s better to double-check your budget before making a purchase.
Philips OLED811 is a mid-range OLED for 2026 that stands out from its biggest rivals mainly for one thing: Ambilight. The light that follows the picture and spreads across the wall can change the mood of the whole viewing experience. In the evening the screen seems to extend beyond its frame and watching gains an extra bit of charm. For some it will be a pleasant extra, for others a decisive reason to pick Philips again. The picture itself is very comparable to what models like the LG C6 or Samsung S90H offer when using the same panel type. You get deep, perfect blacks that make bright elements really pop. The OLED811 can deliver strong HDR and, importantly, after calibration the picture is close to the reference. There’s no big advantage over the competition, but there’s also no sense that by choosing Philips for Ambilight you’re sacrificing image quality.
Gamers also get a few solid upgrades over last year’s model. Thanks to the MediaTek Pentonic 800 chipset we finally have four HDMI 2.1 ports, so connecting several devices, for example consoles, a PC and a soundbar, no longer means you have to decide which one gets the full capabilities of the port. Gaming itself is very enjoyable — the TV responds quickly, supports variable refresh rate, and from a PC it allows gaming in 4K at 165 Hz. It’s a pity the new processor’s capabilities haven’t been put to equally good use when processing lower-quality sources. The biggest doubts, however, concern the operating system. Titan OS replaced the popular Google TV and, although it has clearly developed over the past year, it’s still hard to call the change a good one. True, the system runs more smoothly, has more useful features, and its library already includes most popular streaming services. Still, the choice of apps is much smaller than Google’s (or the competition’s), and in our view that remains the OLED811’s biggest drawback. People using less popular services may feel that difference particularly strongly.
Is it worth buying? Yes, if Titan OS meets your needs. In terms of picture and the gaming features, the OLED811 has as much to offer as its rivals, but Ambilight gives it something others don’t. Philips therefore gives and takes a bit. It adds a unique viewing atmosphere but limits freedom of app choice. If the services you use are available, this compromise may be worth accepting.