LG UA75006LA (VA) vs Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

Direct comparison

PQS9011 / PQS9001 / the one 2026

Info

Available screen sizes: 50”55”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Titan OS

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

6.0

6.8

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.0

    6.4

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.1

    6.3

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    5.0

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    6.9

    7.4

  • TV as a computer monitor

    5.4

    8.6

  • Watching in bright light

    4.6

    6.1

  • Utility functions

    7.0

    7.6

  • Apps

    9.1

    7.2

  • Sound quality

    6.0

    6.9

Advantages

  • High native contrast (VA panel), better black levels, less "flattened" image in evening screenings

  • Proper upscaling and decent tonal gradient transitions

  • webOS system with a rich app base and support for AirPlay

  • Ability to record to USB from built-in tuners

  • Low input lag (below 10 ms)

  • Friendly for the "Sunday gamer": ALLM, VRR (48–60 Hz), Game Bar, HGiG

  • Ambilight, which gives evening viewing sessions a unique ambience and improves the perceived native contrast of the VA panel

  • Excellent panel response time: minimal motion blur of moving objects

  • Many features for gamers: four HDMI 2.1 ports, VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • 144 Hz refresh at 4K and 240 Hz at Full HD from a PC

  • Good coverage of a wide colour gamut: PFS LED

  • Dolby Vision, which genuinely helps the TV with HDR content

  • Decent brightness of around 500 nits, useful for daytime viewing

  • Rotating stand

Disadvantages

No like
  • Limited colour gamut coverage (approx. 80% DCI-P3), HDR rather symbolic

  • No dynamic HDR formats (Dolby Vision, HDR10+)

  • Typical viewing angle issues for VA panels

  • Quite a plastic casing and no Magic remote included

  • No local dimming: average blacks in the evening and a limited HDR effect

  • Smaller app library than the competition

  • Poor viewing angles (can be mitigated with a swivel stand)

  • Very high input lag in games with Dolby Vision

  • Significant errors in HDR colour reproduction (no CMS adjustment available)

  • IR remote that requires aiming

Our verdict

LG UA7500 in the VA panel variant is a television designed for daily watching of TV, YouTube or streaming platforms, where SDR content still dominates. It performs this role very well – it has decent digital image processing, respectable upscaling and quite consistent tonal transitions. The biggest advantage remains the webOS system, full of applications and features, such as USB recording, AirPlay support, and screen mirroring. For many people, this is enough to consider it a "daily television". It also works reasonably well as a screen for the casual gamer – even though it only has a 60 Hz panel, it includes ALLM, VRR in the range of 48–60 Hz, and a convenient Game Bar, which are usually reserved for more expensive models. Downsides? Primarily the viewing angles – as is typical with VA panels, the image quickly loses quality from the side. There are also no dynamic HDR formats, and the limited colour gamut means that cinematic "HDR effects" come off quite insignificantly. On the other hand, this is an affordable television that is likely to see attractive discounts, so if someone doesn’t want to spend a fortune and accepts its limitations, they get a solid "everyday model" with a good system. It’s just a pity that the manufacturer didn’t include the Magic remote in the package.

The idea behind The One series has remained practically unchanged for years, and with the Philips PQS9001 this is both an advantage and its biggest weakness. Once again, we get a versatile mid-range TV whose main distinguishing feature is Ambilight. The lighting that follows what is happening on the screen can completely change the atmosphere of an evening movie session, and for many people it will be the main reason to choose this TV. That is hardly surprising, because once you get used to the effect, it can be difficult to go back to watching without it. The picture quality itself is good, but we have already seen a very similar level from this series in previous years. The VA panel provides decent blacks, colours are nicely saturated, and the brightness is sufficient for comfortable viewing in a typical living room. It is a shame, however, that Philips did not take another step forward and introduce at least basic local dimming. In a dark room, blacks can look noticeably bluish, and HDR, while clearly visible, does not make as strong an impression as it could. After so many years of The One being on the market, we would have expected a little more progress here.

There has, however, been a noticeable improvement in Titan OS. Compared with last year, and especially with the version from two years ago, the system has become much more pleasant to use. There are more apps, many smaller functions have been improved, and a number of irritating bugs we previously complained about have been fixed. Overall, it works reasonably well, although we are once again frustrated by the remote control, which still requires you to point it directly at the TV. Philips continues to rely on infrared for regular navigation, even though voice control uses a wireless connection. That makes it even harder to understand why the same connection was not used for navigating the menus. The One also has quite a lot to offer gamers. Four HDMI 2.1 ports and a broad set of gaming features are one thing, but what impressed us most was the panel’s response time. Our unit showed practically no visible smearing, even on dark backgrounds, which is quite rare for an LCD TV with a VA panel. Philips deserves a lot of credit for that. The ability to play at 4K 144 Hz or Full HD 240 Hz also makes the TV an interesting option for PC users. Unfortunately, there is still one unfinished element: using Dolby Vision in games on Xbox results in very high input lag.

The PQS9000 therefore leaves us with mixed feelings. It can surprise with excellent motion handling and shows that Philips has clearly worked on its operating system, but we do not see a similar step forward in picture quality. This is a TV we can recommend primarily to fans of Ambilight. If that lighting system is the main reason you are considering a Philips, then buying The One makes a lot of sense. It is still worth checking, however, whether you can find a Mini LED model with good local dimming at a similar price. Such a TV may offer deeper blacks and more impressive HDR performance. In the end, the choice comes down to what matters more to you: the atmosphere created by Ambilight or better picture quality itself.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Average
Good
Stand type
Legs
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

5.8/10

5.8/10

Local dimming function: No

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

6,350:1

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,800:1

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,350:1

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,900:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,500:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

3,950:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,600:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

5,750:1

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Contrast and black detail

Result

4,500:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

This is where the biggest advantage of the VA panel version begins. A contrast ratio of around 6000:1 means that during evening viewing, the picture gains depth, and darker scenes in films appear natural and do not fade into grey. It's clear that the blacks are much better than in the IPS panel variant, and this difference is what defines the character of the television. Of course, it's important to remember that the UA7500 does not have local dimming, so one shouldn't expect miracles. The darkest shots won't match those of more expensive televisions, but at least the contrast is stable and sufficient for convincing evening viewing.

Black levels and contrast on the Philips PQS9000 are decent for an LCD TV without local dimming. That's mainly down to the VA panel — in our movie scenes contrast often exceeded 5000:1, and at weaker points fell to around 4000:1. That delivers an image with quite good depth and a clear advantage over typical IPS panels, where blacks much more easily look grey. Unfortunately, that's about as far as the panel's capabilities go. The TV has no local dimming, so it can't dim a dark background separately while keeping strong highlights in another part of the screen. All it has is global dimming, which brightens or dims the whole backlight at once. In a completely dark room those limitations become visible: blacks take on a dark navy tint, and shadowy scenes lack the depth of a good screen with zoned local dimming. Thankfully Ambilight helps here. The light on the wall makes on-screen blacks appear deeper and helps mask the panel's glow a little. It doesn't change the TV's actual contrast, but it affects how our eyes perceive it. In this case Ambilight is therefore not just decorative, because it can also make evening viewing more pleasant.

HDR effect quality

4.3/10

5.5/10

Supported formats
HDR10, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 79.4%, Bt.2020: 59.2%
DCI P3: 94.5%, Bt.2020: 75.5%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

300 nit

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

263 nit

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

366 nit

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

218 nit

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) Brightness measurement

Result

351 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

449 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

467 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

487 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

486 nit

Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) Brightness measurement

Result

507 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

LG UA75006LA (VA)

LG UA7500 with a VA panel has brightness peaking around 350 nits, which, by today's standards, isn't very impressive. It's hard to talk about a true HDR experience here – most content looks more like classic SDR with a slight attempt to boost highlights. One advantage is that regardless of the test content, the effect remained relatively stable. However, we noticed that in very extreme scenes with a lot of fine details, the television can slightly dim the image in order to achieve better blacks, but this comes at the expense of the visibility of bright effects. On the downside, it should be noted that the UA7500 is not equipped with any additional technologies to expand the colours. It's neither a QLED panel nor PFS LED, which means the coverage of the DCI-P3 colour gamut is just 80%, making many HDR films look flat and failing to capture the full diversity of colours.

The Philips PQS9000 is a moderately bright TV — in our HDR scenes it reached roughly 450 to just over 500 nits. That’s enough to notice a difference compared with SDR. Sun reflections, lamps or flares have a bit more punch than on basic TVs, whose brightness often tops out around 300 nits. It’s not, however, a level where bright elements look especially striking. The biggest limitation remains contrast. Without local dimming, brightening a bright object also lifts the black level around it. So there’s no clear separation between strong highlights and a dark background, and it’s that kind of pairing that really shows what HDR can do. The PQS9000 offers more than the cheapest models, but despite decent brightness the effect remains fairly basic.

Colours

Philips deserves praise for the colours. Although the manufacturer markets this model as QLED, it actually uses a PFS phosphor instead of quantum dots. The solution itself doesn’t prevent good results. On test patterns and in measurements of film scenes we recorded about 94% DCI-P3 coverage and 75% BT.2020. For this class of TV that’s really good. In practice this means the vast majority of colours used in HDR films and series will have appropriate saturation. Lush greens or intense reds aren’t a problem and add appeal to the picture. Limitations are easier to notice in some games and rarer content that use the most saturated shades of the wide BT.2020 gamut. In those situations, displays with wider colour coverage, such as SQD or RGB LED, can show more. At its price point the PQS9000 has nothing to be ashamed of.

Factory color reproduction

5.6/10

5.1/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The Filmmaker Mode on the LG UA7500 performs better than one might expect from such a budget TV, but let's not get carried away with the praise. The image is reasonably well put together and at first glance doesn't irritate, however, its weaknesses quickly start to emerge. This is most apparent in scenes with bright points – lamps in the background or reflections of light on the skin are clearly exaggerated. Faces of characters often look unnatural, as if they have been "burned out." Additionally, the default gamma setting brightens the smallest details and causes the image to lose subtlety in the darker areas. That said, for its price range, the UA7500 in factory mode offers a pretty decent starting point. However, it is clear that without additional adjustments, these issues cannot be avoided, which is why – similar to other TVs – we decided to check what could be achieved after calibration.

The factory picture settings for Movie mode on the PQS9000 unfortunately need tweaking. In SDR the biggest problem is an excess of red in the white balance, which makes whites, greys and skin tones too warm, in places even slightly pink. Gamma runs below the reference across most of the range. The TV therefore brightens midtones and highlights, making the image look flatter than it should.

In HDR the white balance itself performs significantly better. Apart from minor deviations the components sit close together, so there isn’t the same obvious tint as in SDR. The EOTF curve, however, shows a slight brightening of parts of the image, and the biggest issue appears when measuring the wide colour gamut. Many shades deviate substantially from the target, with errors reaching ΔE 8–9. The good gamut coverage we praised earlier therefore doesn’t mean the TV hits specific colours accurately. It can display a wide range of colours, but out of the box it doesn’t use that range very precisely.

Color reproduction after calibration

7/10

7.7/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The biggest improvement we noticed was while calibrating the mode designed for daily SDR content. We managed to smooth out the white balance in an acceptable manner and tackle the issue of excessive brightening of small elements due to the gamma characteristic. As a result, the image gained the consistency and naturalness that was lacking in the factory settings. After such correction, we can confidently state that for everyday TV content, programs, or materials from YouTube, the LG UA7500 performs really well – especially after professional calibration. The situation looks a bit different for HDR content. Here, calibration helped to tame the white balance and slightly improved brightness management, but the limitations of the design are immediately apparent. The lack of additional filters to expand the colour palette means that the most vivid colors appear flat, and the image lacks the intensity we would expect from good HDR. So, in SDR, the UA7500 performs quite well, but in HDR – despite corrections – it remains far behind, and this is a characteristic that one must accept when choosing this television.

Calibration brought a big improvement, especially with SDR content. We managed to even out the white balance and remove the earlier colour cast, and the Color Checker measurements now look very good. Colours are much closer to what they should be on screen, so with regular TV or SDR movies we can be happy with the result. Unfortunately HDR spoils that a bit. On the one hand it's limited by the panel itself, because calibration won't improve contrast or replace local dimming. On the other hand there are colour errors we couldn't correct because the CMS settings, i.e. colour management, were greyed out and inactive. That loses Philips points with us. The white balance can be fine-tuned, but without access to wide gamut controls you can't as effectively sort out colours in HDR. It's a shame, because the SDR results show the potential is there, but we weren't allowed to fully make use of it everywhere.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8.8/10

8.6/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The colour transitions in most scenes were smooth and difficult for the average viewer to notice. However, the VA panel variant offered something more – in the darker parts of the image, it was possible to see many more shades, as the higher contrast allowed them to stand out better. As a result, the image did not appear flat and looked more natural. The transitions between colours were generally quite good and did not distract from the content.

Philips PQS9000 handles tonal transitions very well. It looks especially good in dark scenes, where shades blend smoothly into one another without visible banding or clear boundaries between colours. As a result, even on large, uniform areas the image looks smooth. Minor imperfections only appear in the brighter tones, but you have to look closely to notice them. During normal viewing they are unlikely to distract from the film. In this category, Philips performs really well.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

LG UA7500 with a VA panel has shown itself in this category in a really good light. Image scaling from Full HD or even SD materials was surprisingly smooth. The picture looked smooth, edges were not overly jagged, and the television maintained a good amount of detail, ensuring that even older films did not lose their character. It particularly excelled with faces – there were no artificial contours or "mask" effects, which often occur in cheaper models. The way the television handled tonal transitions in lower quality materials is also noteworthy. Thanks to digital processing, colours did not bleed into one another, and gradients looked natural and smooth. There was no question of intrusive smoothing of the image or loss of cinematic grain. This makes the UA7500 great for everyday content – from free-to-air television, to sports matches, all the way to YouTube, where we often watch materials in various resolutions.

Digital image processing on the Philips PQS9000 performs well, although we have a few reservations. The "Distortion Reduction" function helps smooth tonal transitions in lower-quality sources, but it works rather unevenly. It can improve one part of the picture, only to, moments later and still within the same scene, lose its way and show banding between shades again. On the plus side, it doesn't strip away film grain or fine noise, so the image retains its texture. We found the "Medium" setting worked best and that's the one we recommend.

The upscaling to 4K itself is adequate, though the image is very soft. Edges are heavily smoothed, which may leave some viewers wanting more clarity. In that case, it's worth slightly increasing the sharpness in the TV menu, as this will help emphasise edges more. Don't overdo the sharpness slider, though, or you'll get artificial halos instead of an improvement.

Blur and motion smoothness

4/10

8.1/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
60Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
No
OK
BFI function 60Hz
No
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
-%
0%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur ():

Blur (1080p@240Hz):

LG UA7500 is a TV with a 60 Hz panel, so it’s hard to expect any raving reviews in this category. It’s more of a screen meant for everyday content or an evening movie session rather than for following dynamic sporting events or playing action games. It's evident that the manufacturer targeted this model precisely at this group of consumers – and in that regard, it performs adequately. We get the TruMotion function, which is a motion smoother. It’s simple, has only one slider, but it can make a noticeable difference. In the lower range, the image looks more raw and cinematic, while at higher values, the motion becomes smoother and more pleasant to the eye.

In terms of motion handling the Philips PQS9000 performs exceptionally well for an LCD TV. It's not just about the 144 Hz refresh rate, but above all how quickly the panel itself responds. At 120 Hz you can hardly see the typical trailing smears behind moving objects. What's particularly pleasing is that this also applies to darker backgrounds, where many VA panels clearly struggle. Here motion remains clear, and in this respect Philips has pleasantly surprised us.

The "Motion Styles" feature is used to adjust how motion is displayed. It includes two sliders: "Smoothness" and "Blur Reduction", allowing you to tailor the effect to the material you're watching and your personal preferences. Our suggested settings are shown in the photo. Treat them as a starting point and see which level of smoothing suits you best.

Console compatibility and gaming features

6/10

9.5/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 60Hz
    48 - 240Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    No
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    No
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

LG UA7500 is a TV that can be comfortably recommended to "Sunday" gamers. While it doesn't feature a 120 Hz panel or HDMI 2.1 ports, meaning it can't fully utilise the potential of modern consoles, the manufacturer has included a few extras that can enhance the gaming experience. The Game Bar deserves a special mention – a very nicely designed panel where you can quickly view and change the most important settings. From this interface, we have access to features like ALLM (Automatic Low Latency Mode) and frame synchronization, also known as VRR. The range of VRR is limited – working from 48 to 60 Hz – but the mere presence of this feature in such an affordable TV is impressive.

Additionally, it supports HGiG, which is a mode for HDR calibration for gaming. It sounds good, but from our testing experience, we know that for the UA7500, this option isn't very practical. The TV doesn't handle HDR very well, so ironically, we achieved better results with this mode turned off. This is another indication that the UA7500 is more of a screen for casual gamers who value simplicity and convenience, rather than for those seeking a full experience with the latest consoles.

Features for gamers

In terms of gaming features the Philips PQS9000 has a lot to offer. Four HDMI 2.1 ports let you connect multiple devices without having to choose which one gets the full capabilities. Consoles can use 120 Hz at Full HD, 1440p and 4K, and a PC can also run 144 Hz at 4K or 240 Hz if you drop to Full HD. There's also VRR, which matches the refresh rate to the frame rate and prevents screen tearing. Its range runs from 48 to 240 Hz, with the upper limit applying to Full HD mode.

It also includes ALLM, so the TV switches itself into game mode, and a properly working HGiG, which is handy when setting HDR on the console. There's a Game Bar for quick access to settings and signal information. The list even includes Dolby Vision gaming, but it's hard to enjoy because of very high input lag. Apart from that caveat, the feature set is really solid.

Input lag

10/10

7.2/10

SDR

1080p60
10 ms
32 ms
1080p120
16 ms
2160p60
10 ms
32 ms
2160p120
16 ms

HDR

2160p60
10 ms
32 ms
2160p120
16 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
213 ms
2160p120 DV
106 ms

A delay of less than 10 ms is a result that more expensive models would envy. This makes games run exceptionally responsively, and every action on the controller is instantly visible on the screen. This is one of the strongest points of this television, especially for those who like to fire up the console from time to time.

Input lag is less impressive than the rest of the gaming hardware. At 60 Hz we measured 32 ms, both in SDR and HDR. That's enough for more relaxed games, but in fast shooters you can already feel a slight lag. At 120 Hz the delay drops to 16 ms and gaming is noticeably more pleasant, though rivals can respond even faster. The biggest problem appears when Dolby Vision is enabled. At 60 Hz the delay is as much as 213 ms, and at 120 Hz it reaches 106 ms. The response to controller input is then clearly delayed, which seriously disrupts gameplay. So with the PQS9000 it's definitely better to stick with HDR10. Dolby Vision is supported in games, but its practical usefulness remains limited.

Compatibility with PC

5.4/10

8.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Very Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Average
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
10ms
16ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
60Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
No
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

LG UA7500 with a VA panel performs somewhat worse in this regard. The fonts aren't quite as crystal clear as in an IPS, and after extended use, you may notice a difference in readability. Chroma 4:4:4 support is, of course, available, so colours look correct, but overall it doesn't provide such a comfortable effect. In everyday use, the differences may not be significant, but for working with text and graphics, IPS proves to be a much better choice. The VA version is more suited as a versatile TV with PC connection options, rather than a fully-fledged office tool.

The PQS9000 earns a high mark for PC use mainly thanks to its gaming capabilities. Its 144 Hz refresh rate at 4K and support for G-Sync Compatible and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro let you synchronise frames on compatible NVIDIA and AMD cards. Working with text also fares well. Regular fonts are sharp and legible, and with proper 4:4:4 chroma support coloured letters, icons and small desktop elements do not lose their clarity. The biggest caveat concerns very small, dark text: the horizontal strokes of letters are noticeably darker than the vertical ones, which makes some characters look uneven. You probably won't notice this from the couch, but if someone plans to put The One on their desk and work up close, that flaw may become annoying.

Viewing angles

3.1/10

3.2/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
76%
68%

The VA panel version presents a completely different approach. Straight on, the screen looks significantly better – the contrast is higher, blacks are deeper, and colours more saturated than with IPS. The problem begins when we move away from the axis. Just sitting slightly off to the side causes the colours to start losing their intensity, and the image becomes noticeably washed out. Blacks quickly turn grey, and the overall character is lost. Therefore, the UA7500 in the VA version works best in a typically "cinematic" setup – with a sofa or armchair positioned centrally in front of the screen. Then the television can provide a much better experience than IPS, but when watching with a larger group from various spots in the room, the limited viewing angles become its biggest drawback.

Viewing angles are one of the weakest points of the Philips PQS9001. Just move to the side and the colours noticeably lose saturation, and the image looks washed out and loses contrast. When watching with several people, seats directly in front of the screen will therefore be by far the best.

Unfortunately, this is a typical trait of VA panels. Good contrast when viewed head-on comes at the expense of poorer off‑axis performance. Most TVs with that panel have a similar problem and The One is no exception. The rotating stand helps a little by letting you angle the screen toward the viewer, but with widely spaced seats it won't solve the issue.

Daytime performance

4.6/10

6.1/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026): 502 cd/m2

LG UA75006LA (VA): 302 cd/m2

LG UA7500 with a VA panel performed slightly better when it comes to watching in a bright room. The applied coating handles reflections moderately well – it doesn’t completely eliminate them but softens them enough so that you can watch TV during the day without much discomfort. A plus is that the TV retains quite decent colour saturation, making the picture not look washed out even with incoming light. The brightness itself is also a bit higher than in the IPS variant, reaching around 300 nits, so the screen is somewhat more resistant to difficult lighting conditions. Of course, this level won’t provide comfort in very sunlit living rooms, but in typical home conditions, it holds its own.

Philips PQS9001 performs quite well for daytime viewing. The biggest advantage is a stable brightness of around 500 nits, regardless of how many bright elements appear on the screen. Even when watching winter sports or an all-white scene, the picture doesn't dim. In a typical living room that level is more than enough to comfortably watch TV without having to block out the windows.

The satin finish does a decent job of reducing reflections, though it doesn't remove them completely. A window opposite the screen will be visible and can be distracting, especially in darker scenes. Blacks hold up well in daylight, so the image doesn't become overly washed out. For everyday viewing it's therefore quite good, as long as the sun isn't shining directly on the screen.

Panel details

Backlight Type
White LED
PFS LED
Software version during testing
33.20.81
TPM267E_V167.002.054.151
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review LG UA75006LA (VA) TV Panel details
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV Panel details

LG UA75006LA (VA)

Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026)

TV features

7/10

7.6/10

  • System
    WebOS
    Titan OS
  • System performance
    Decent
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    No
    No
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    Yes
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    No
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    No
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review LG UA75006LA (VA) TV features
Review LG UA75006LA (VA) TV features
Review LG UA75006LA (VA) TV features
Review LG UA75006LA (VA) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features
Review Philips PQS9011 / PQS9001 (The One 2026) TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    Yes
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    Yes
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Smart Features: WebOS

A major plus for the LG UA7500 is the use of the webOS system. We gain access to a rich library of applications, support for AirPlay, screen mirroring, and many additional features that allow us to use the television in a really convenient way. It is easy to connect a smartphone, watch something from streaming services, or use music applications. However, the downside is that webOS remains quite a "heavy" system, and on the UA7500 it does not operate as smoothly as in more expensive models. The situation is not improved by the fact that the manufacturer has not equipped us here with a Magic remote with a cursor, which significantly speeds up operation. We get a regular infrared remote, lacking that "magic" wand. Of course, it can be purchased separately, but considering the cost, it often makes more sense to pay extra for a higher LG model that already comes with such a remote.

Classic Features

In more traditional use, the LG UA7500 also does not disappoint. The remote is equipped with a numeric keypad and a fair number of buttons, which will definitely be appreciated by users accustomed to older solutions. Additionally, there is the option to record programs to USB from the built-in tuners and a fairly readable EPG interface, which makes planning a viewing session easier. The downside remains the fact that the remote always requires pointing at the screen – but we believe that most more traditional users will be able to forgive this, treating it as a familiar and trusted tool.

Titan OS in this year’s The One shows that Philips has been working on its system. Compared with last year’s version, many little things and functions that didn’t work properly before have been fixed. Now we can easily use AirPlay, mirror a computer screen via Miracast, or do voice searches in Polish. The system itself runs decently, though it’s far from the fastest. The app library has also grown. It includes Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, CANAL+, Apple TV and YouTube. The selection is still smaller than on Google TV, but when using popular services Titan increasingly gives fewer reasons to complain.

Classic features also show an improvement in everyday convenience. You can connect Bluetooth headphones and listen through them at the same time as the TV speakers. There’s also a mode that turns off the screen and leaves only the audio. Recording to USB and picture-in-picture (PiP) are missing. What’s most disappointing is the remote. Despite backlit buttons, it still controls the TV via infrared, so you have to point it at the screen. The system has picked up a number of useful fixes, but that part of the user experience remains unchanged and can be irritating in everyday use.

Apps

9.1/10

7.2/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
No
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
No
Spotify
No
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
No
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
No
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.2/10

8.6/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
Yes
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
No
6 Mpix
Yes
No
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
No
12 Mpix
Yes
No
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
No
No
28 Mpix
No
No
32 Mpix
No
Yes

The multimedia player in the UA7500 works fine – movies or music start up without major issues and this should be sufficient for most people. However, one thing caught our attention: the television does not play all photo formats. In practice, this means that if we upload photos straight from a smartphone to a USB drive, some may simply not open. It’s a minor detail, but it’s worth keeping in mind. Fortunately, you can always use wireless image transmission to display photos on the screen in another way.

The built-in USB player runs quickly and smoothly and handles most of the files we tested without trouble. Music playback is solid, from common MP3s to FLAC files, including 96 kHz/24-bit. It's perfectly adequate for everyday media playback from a USB stick. However, our biggest complaint is again the handling of photos. The player is quite selective about resolution: it opened our 8, 16 and 32 Mpix files but failed with, among others, 4, 12 and 24 Mpix. It's hard to find any logic in that when a larger photo works but a smaller one doesn't. That can be annoying when browsing holiday photos.

Sound

6/10

6.9/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    96dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    No
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    Yes

In terms of sound, the LG UA7500 doesn't surprise with powerful bass or maximum volume, but it performs surprisingly well. Our impression was that it fares better than most of the cheapest budget TVs and for everyday use, it really does the job quite nicely. It will be just right for news, programs, or series.

The Philips PQS9001 has a 2.0 audio system with a total power of 40 W, that is, two 10 W speakers on each side. It sounds fairly good and definitely better than most budget TVs. There's plenty of volume, but the sound itself lacks depth. The biggest issue is the lack of low end, so explosions in films or heavier sections of music don't have the proper weight.

High frequencies aren't reproduced evenly either. Measurements show a noticeable dip around 2 kHz, then a boost at 6-7 kHz and a drop above about 8 kHz. That can emphasise sibilance and add a bit of harshness to the sound, despite the rolled-off top end. It's fine for everyday viewing, but for films and music it's worth considering additional audio. All the more so because the TV supports spatial audio formats, including Dolby Atmos and DTS. A compatible soundbar or AV receiver will make better use of those formats than the built-in speakers.

Sound Quality Test

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

96dBC (Max)

75dBC

Reader comments

Comments are provided by the external service Disqus (Zeta Global). Once loaded, Disqus may set cookies and process data about your activity.

We will remember your choice on this device. Provider's privacy policy