LG QNED93A / QNED90A vs LG NANO81A / NANO80A

Direct comparison

QNED93A / QNED90A

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 43”50”55”65”75”86”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.3

5.7

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.8

    5.1

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.9

    5.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    5.4

  • Gaming on console

    8.5

    6.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    6.0

  • Watching in bright light

    6.2

    4.0

  • Utility functions

    8.2

    6.6

  • Apps

    9.1

    9.1

  • Sound quality

    6.9

    6.2

Advantages

  • Pretty good contrast

  • High number of dimming zones

  • Good HDR brightness (around 1400 nits)

  • Wide colour gamut coverage (around 96% DCI-P3)

  • 144 Hz mode and a full set of features for gamers (HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, G-Sync, FreeSync, HGiG, Game Bar)

  • Low input lag (7 ms at 120 Hz)

  • Good compatibility with PC, including 144 Hz and clear fonts

  • WebOS with a rich selection of apps and voice control

  • Magic remote

  • Quite effective upscaling and image processing tools - works great for older content like free-to-air TV or YouTube

  • Wide viewing angles (IPS panel)

  • Very low input lag (around 10-12 ms)

  • Smooth webOS 2025 system

  • Intuitive Magic remote with pointer

  • Better colour gamut coverage thanks to NanoCell filter

  • Excellent as a PC monitor (sharp fonts, Chroma 4:4:4)

  • Decent features for gamers (VRR, ALLM, HGiG)

  • Extensive calibration options and natural colours after adjustments

  • Good image processing and efficient scaling of older content

  • Noticeable low-frequency boost in sound

Disadvantages

No like
  • Local dimming algorithms need refinement

  • Very average viewing angles

  • Dolby Vision does not bring a noticeable improvement over HDR10

  • Poor black level and low contrast

  • Low brightness (around 250 nits – weak for very bright rooms)

  • Only 60 Hz refresh rate

  • USB player does not support HEIC files and very large images (over 20 Mpix)

Our verdict

LG QNED93A is a television that at first glance appears to be a solid step forward compared to previous LCD models from this brand. On paper, we get a lot: significantly more dimming zones, 144 Hz refresh rate for gamers, support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision, and WebOS with a new Magic remote, which remains one of the most user-friendly control systems. The QNED93A shines most brightly in gaming applications. Four fully-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports allow you to connect consoles and computers without any limitations, and the low input lag is maintained at both 120 and 60 Hz. For PC gamers, an additional advantage will be the 144 Hz mode and full compatibility with G-Sync and FreeSync. So it can confidently be said that in terms of features for gamers, the QNED93A doesn't have any complexes compared to the competition. Another strong point is WebOS. LG's system has been regarded for years as one of the most user-friendly in everyday use, and this is confirmed here. Everything is clear, and the Magic remote allows you to operate the TV like a mouse pointer – quickly and intuitively. Brightness is also a plus. At its peak, it managed to achieve results close to 1400 nits. This is enough for the image to not wash out in brighter rooms and for special effects in movies or games to look convincing. The image processor handles upscaling older content well – television or films in lower resolutions appear clearer and sharper than on many competing screens.

However, it cannot be hidden that the biggest problem with the QNED93A is the local dimming algorithms. In scenes full of blacks, the screen can darken significantly, causing many details to simply vanish. The effect is such that the contrast looks better at first glance, but at the cost of information that should be visible. An additional problem is the Dolby Vision mode, which usually improves certain aspects of screens, but in this case changes very little. The differences between dynamic and static metadata have to be literally searched for with a magnifying glass. This is simply disappointing because the hardware's number of dimming zones and stronger backlighting provide the basis for a better effect. So who is the LG QNED93A for? It is a television that will work excellently as a home entertainment centre, especially if you’re thinking about gaming on consoles or PCs. In everyday watching of TV and films in well-lit conditions, it will also provide a lot of satisfaction thanks to its high brightness and decent image processor. However, one must accept that in scenes with a lot of black and full utilization of HDR, this model does not measure up to its competitors. LG has shown that it can create a very solid LCD screen, but it is also evident that not everything has been refined as it has in their OLED televisions.

LG NANO81A is essentially a continuation of the NanoCell series, which has hardly changed over the past few years. Aside from a new operating system, a refreshed remote, and a few marketing add-ons, we are dealing with practically the same construction that we have known for years. Thanks to the nano-particle filter, the television can display better, cleaner colours than standard budget televisions, and the IPS panel ensures really decent viewing angles. Unfortunately, for these advantages, we pay the price of very poor blacks and low contrast, which is immediately noticeable during night screenings. Although webOS is still one of the best systems on the market, the biggest problem with the NANO81A is its price, which we simply do not understand. In 2025, this model has huge competition not only from brands like TCL and Hisense but... from LG itself. The model we tested earlier, QNED80A, is equipped with local dimming technology, has a brighter panel, and offers a wider colour palette. Interestingly, at the time of writing this review, the technically superior QNED80A is often much cheaper than the NANO81A. In this situation, the existence of the NanoCell model loses its meaning – unless your priority is solely wide viewing angles, but in our opinion, the price you have to pay for them (at the expense of terrible blacks and a higher cost) is simply too high.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Average
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.3/10

1.5/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 308 (14 x 22)

Local dimming function: No

Contrast:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

130,500:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

30,950:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

15,250:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

6,750:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

800:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

850:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

900:1

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Contrast and black detail

Result

750:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

We took a close look at the 55-inch version of the LG QNED93A, featuring a high-contrast VA panel. However, for Mini-LED TVs, it’s not just the panel itself but primarily the number and performance of the local dimming zones that determine the final effect. In this model, we counted an impressive 308 zones right off the bat. In comparison, last year’s QNED91T in the 65-inch variant had only about 160. The difference is huge and shows that LG has made a significant step forward in this technology. On paper, it looks great, but in practice, enthusiasm quickly cools. The contrast in the QNED93A can indeed be impressive – bright elements are clearly separated from the blacks, and in many scenes, the depth effect is a real delight for the eyes. The problem is that despite such a significant improvement in the backlighting design, the results aren’t much better than last year’s model. The algorithms controlling the dimming can be overly aggressive. This is especially evident in darker sequences, where the screen dims to the point that subtle details vanish from view. Many viewers will appreciate the stronger blacks, but it’s hard to ignore that this comes at the expense of the director's intentions. The most problematic scenes turn out to be those with many small, bright elements. It is precisely then that the typical halo effects, or luminous halos, associated with LCDs and local zone dimming appear around them. While this phenomenon doesn’t completely ruin the experience, it serves as a reminder that even with an increased number of zones, local dimming still has its limitations. Ultimately, the contrast in the QNED93A can be considered good, but we feel that the manufacturer didn’t put in enough effort in optimising the new model in terms of blacks and contrast.

The NanoCell series, including the model NANO81 we tested, is based on an IPS panel. For anyone who's somewhat familiar with screens, this means one thing: huge problems with blacks and contrast. Our measurements here are merciless. A result of 800:1 is, to put it bluntly, a tragic outcome. In practice, this means that what should appear as deep black on the screen looks like a dark grey blob at night. Watching dark films or series in a completely dark room will simply be torture – the image loses all its depth and appears flat. If you do decide to go for this model, we have one key piece of advice for you: don’t watch it in total darkness. To salvage the situation somewhat, it's best to leave a gentle light on in the room, and the ideal solution would be to install LED strips behind the television. Such wall lighting will trick your eye (this is known as simultaneous contrast) and make that grey on the screen seem a bit darker. Nevertheless, the beginning of the test regarding cinematic experiences is looking grim.

HDR effect quality

5.8/10

3.6/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.1%, Bt.2020: 77.1%
DCI P3: 87.6%, Bt.2020: 65.3%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1330 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

219 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

678 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

160 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1016 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

228 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

193 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

250 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

168 nit

Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  Brightness measurement

Result

252 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

Although the number of local dimming zones in the LG QNED93A hasn’t directly translated to noticeably better contrast, it’s hard to deny this model one thing – it’s brighter than its predecessor. In synthetic tests, we recorded values around 1400-1500 nits, and more importantly, these results are reflected in real film scenes. In full-screen sequences flooded with whites or bright lights, the screen was able to maintain high luminance, providing a truly decent amazing HDR effect. Unfortunately, where the TV could show true class, that is in scenes requiring precision, all the magic dissipates. The dimming algorithms we mentioned earlier operate aggressively enough that small, bright objects – like distant lights, stars, or the moon – can almost completely disappear. Just look at the test scenes from the film Pan or Sicario 2 (screens 2 and 4) to see how subtle details are dimmed to the limits of their visibility. It’s a pity because a greater number of zones could theoretically translate to significantly better performance. Fortunately, there are also strong points. The QNED93A performs well in terms of colour gamut coverage, achieving around 96% of the DCI-P3 standard. As a result, colours in films look rich and full, and the image doesn’t lose intensity even in more demanding scenes. So, it can be said that the HDR in this model is solid, although the underdeveloped local dimming algorithms hinder its full potential.

If you're hoping that HDR on the NANO81A will bring tears to your eyes, I have to disappoint you. This TV is just too dark to show what this format is really about. With a brightness of only 250 nits, HDR really only exists on paper here. In practice, during viewing, it's very hard to tell whether we're watching material in high dynamic range or regular SDR – it simply lacks that “punch” of light in the bright parts of the image. But, to balance out the criticism, we do have one light at the end of the tunnel – and quite a distinct one at that. It's about colour gamut coverage. Here, the NanoCell filter shows that it's not just marketing nonsense. Our measurements indicated that the coverage of the DCI-P3 space is around 88%. That's a really solid result, placing this model significantly above typical budget models based on regular white LEDs without any filters. Of course, it still lags a bit behind QLED TVs or advanced panels with PFS filters, but for this price range, the colours are surprisingly saturated and vibrant. It’s just a shame that this low brightness doesn't allow them to fully “spread their wings” with the Nano filter.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

5.3/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

In film mode (more specifically Filmmaker), the colour reproduction in the QNED93A was relatively accurate, although there were some reservations. In SDR content, the white balance leaned towards warmer tones, resulting in a slight yellowing across the entire screen. Gamma, on the other hand, led to a slight lightening of the image, making it look a bit less natural, especially in scenes that required precise shading (this is evident in the comparison photo). This isn't a problem that immediately stands out to every viewer, but more discerning individuals may feel that the image deviates from the intended aesthetic of the filmmakers. In HDR materials, the situation looked a bit different. The white balance here was quite good, ensuring that whites did not take on pink or unwanted green hues. However, the brightness management turned out to be an issue. An analysis of the EOTF curve revealed that at certain moments, the television could be distinctly too dark where it shouldn't be, losing some details and lowering the realism of scenes. This detracted from the HDR effects, which were theoretically meant to be the most impressive. For this reason, we decided to conduct a calibration.

For every film fan, the natural choice in LG televisions is the Filmmaker Mode. It is designed to show the image as the director intended – without unnecessary "enhancements". Unfortunately, in the case of our test unit NANO81A, the factory settings left a bit to be desired. The main issue turned out to be the white balance. Measurements revealed a distinct deficiency of blue, which in practice meant that many scenes had a slightly yellowish, even "yellowed" tint. The white wasn’t perfectly clean, which took away the freshness of the image. Additionally, the brightness management wasn't perfect either – the factory-set gamma was too low. The image often appeared oversaturated, as if it had been pulled too much from the shadows, which detracted from its naturalness and depth. Fortunately, LG, even in this relatively low price range, does not block access to advanced settings. The calibration options for this model are extensive, which is a significant plus for those who enjoy "fiddling" in the menu. We decided to approach the matter our way and see how much we could squeeze out of this panel with professional calibration.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.8/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After professional calibration, the Filmmaker mode in the QNED93A has improved primarily where it matters most in everyday use. We managed to straighten the white balance and eliminate the yellowish tint in SDR content, which is what we watch most often – television, streaming services, or standard quality movies. As a result, the colours look natural and pleasant, making the overall viewing experience significantly more comfortable. In HDR mode, we also made corrections, but here the biggest issue turned out to be the EOTF curve. Although LG provides some leeway in the settings, the television still controls brightness on its own terms. It's clear that the local dimming algorithms are not fully refined and can ruin the viewing experience by dimming parts of the picture at inappropriate moments. Nevertheless, it’s worth opting for calibration of this model, especially the mode intended for everyday viewing.

After calibration, the NANO81A is a completely different television. What LG offers in terms of image enhancement tools, even in such an affordable model, deserves major credit. We were able to completely eliminate that annoying yellowing of whites and make the colours natural, vibrant, and simply "real". In SDR content (i.e., regular television, YouTube, or older films), the picture now looks miles better – it’s clean, well-balanced, and no longer strains the eyes with strange hues. It’s clear that this panel has significant potential, which is simply wasted out of the box due to poor presets. However, we have one serious reservation that calibration cannot fully overcome – it's about brightness management in HDR mode. The LG algorithm in this model is very conservative. The TV deliberately dims the HDR image to avoid clipping the already weak blacks of the IPS panel. The developers faced a choice: either provide more light and accept that black would become light grey, or dial down the brightness to maintain any contrast. They chose the latter. Despite this, after our adjustments, watching anything on the NANO81 is considerably better.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8/10

9.3/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The smoothness of tonal transitions in the LG QNED93A is really impressive. In most scenes, there are no visible artificial colour banding or posterisation effects. Dark scenes, in particular, are surprisingly good – many TVs struggle in these, but here the image remains smooth and consistent. In brighter sections, one can notice some slight colour blending, but it’s not pronounced enough to be distracting. However, during testing, we encountered a noticeable DSE effect, known as “dirty screen.” On our unit, this effect was strong enough that in bright scenes, the corners noticeably darkened, giving the impression of vignetting. This may be a defect of the test unit, but during intensive viewing, it was hard for us to overlook.

The fluidity of tonal transitions is an element where the NANO81A really shines. LG proves here that it can refine image processing algorithms even in its cheaper models. During testing, we practically did not notice any banding phenomenon, that annoying "stepping" visible where one colour should smoothly transition into another. Everything looks incredibly natural and smooth. This is clearly evident in bright scenes from the film Kingsman, where the backgrounds remain clean and free from digital artefacts. However, what makes an even greater impression is how the television handles extremely difficult, dark, and foggy shots in The Revenant. Where many budget panels falter and produce ugly blotches instead of a smooth mist, the NANO81A holds its ground, offering very velvety transitions. The only downside is the fact that with darker shades, you may notice the weaker black levels of this television rather than any issues with colour blending.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.8/10

7/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The LG QNED93A turns out to be a very solid television for everyday use. Its image processor performs excellently with upscaling, making even older films or free-to-air television sharper and more detailed. During the screening of 'The Godfather,' it’s clearly visible how upscaling brings out additional details from the image – the characters’ faces and the texture of their clothing look significantly clearer than in the original material.

The digital image processing also deserves praise. The television is equipped with a function that reduces unwanted colour banding and screen irregularities. It works best in the 'Medium' setting – subtly smoothing tonal transitions without overly interfering with the image. This way, the natural film grain is preserved, and the screen does not appear artificially smooth. Perhaps in some scenes, slight colour banding can still be noticed, but in practice, the effect is more advantageous than with a stronger intervention from the algorithm.

It often happens that cheap 4K panels ruthlessly expose all the "dirty laundry" and imperfections in lower resolution materials. However, with the LG NANO81A, the situation is completely different. It's a really solid performer when it comes to handling content that's far from ideal. The built-in processor does a great job with upscaling. Even older recordings look quite decent on this screen – the image is coherent, cleaned of digital noise, and simply pleasant to the eye. A big plus is the gradation reduction feature, which you can find in the settings. It is exceptionally effective in combating colour banding, which is a godsend when watching low bitrate materials, such as from some streaming services or older files from the web. However, it is worth maintaining a certain vigilance. Since we are dealing with a less powerful chip than in LG's top models, too aggressive a setting for this option can sometimes result in minor artifacts or slight blurring of details. Despite this risk, I definitely encourage experimentation with this feature – in many cases, it can save the viewing experience and make low-quality material fully watchable.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.6/10

4.6/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
56%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur ():

LG QNED93A has been equipped with a 144 Hz panel. This is primarily a nod to gamers, but the fact that higher refresh rates are increasingly appearing in televisions can be viewed positively. In everyday viewing, 120 Hz remains key, and in this regard, the QNED93A performs well. The manufacturer also provides the option to adjust the picture thanks to the TruMotion system – the De-Judder and De-Blur sliders allow you to choose between a cinematic motion feel with visible frames and full smoothing with theatrical motion.

In terms of motion fluidity, the NANO81A unfortunately has a bit of a hurdle. The television is based on a panel with a refresh rate of 60Hz. If you're looking for perfect sharpness in dynamic football matches or fast-paced action games, you might feel somewhat dissatisfied. With such a low native refresh rate, fast objects on the screen will always be a bit blurry.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

6/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 60Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    No
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

LG QNED93A is a television that has undoubtedly been designed with gamers in mind. Right from the start, we get a complete package – all four HDMI ports operate in 2.1 standard, so whether we connect a console, a PC, or a receiver, we have full compatibility. This is important because many manufacturers still limit themselves to two ports, and here nothing stands in the way of having maximum capabilities for all the equipment. There’s also an automatic game mode (ALLM), which automatically switches the television to the appropriate settings when the console is turned on, as well as variable refresh rate (VRR). This means the image doesn’t stutter or glitch, even when the frame rate drops – whether in dynamic shooters or during races.

The 144 Hz panel gives an additional advantage in computer games. While 120 Hz is enough for consoles, the QNED93A allows PCs to push even more – every movement, every glance to the side is refreshed faster, which makes a difference especially in e-sports. The manufacturer also considered HDR in games – the television supports HGiG mode, which are guidelines intended to ensure that the lighting effects are exactly as the game developers intended. To top it off, we get Game Bar – a special information bar called up on the screen that shows parameters in real time. You can check the frame rate, active VRR functions, or input lag levels. This solution is useful not only for settings enthusiasts but for anyone who wants to quickly check what mode the television is operating in and whether everything is working as it should.

NANO81A is unfortunately not a device designed with esports in mind. The lack of 120 Hz signal support is a fact that users planning to purchase this model simply have to accept. Nevertheless, LG’s engineers have worked hard to squeeze the maximum potential from this 60 Hz panel, offering a set of features that genuinely improve gaming comfort. First and foremost, the television supports VRR technology (in the range of 48–60 Hz) and ALLM. This ensures that the image remains stable and does not "tear," and the device automatically switches to low latency mode as soon as it detects a signal from a console. Managing these settings is extremely simple thanks to a dedicated system overlay that allows for a quick preview of parameters without leaving the game. A very significant advantage is support for the HGiG format. This solution is crucial for owners of modern consoles, as it allows the television to correctly "understand" the intentions of game developers regarding HDR tone mapping. In practice, this helps avoid the effect of "blown-out" bright spots, such as clouds or light sources, which is unfortunately a common issue in budget LCD televisions.

Input lag

9.8/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
13 ms
1080p120
7 ms
2160p60
16 ms
12 ms
2160p120
7 ms

HDR

2160p60
15 ms
12 ms
2160p120
7 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
21 ms
2160p120 DV
7 ms

In the delay field, the LG QNED93A has nothing to be ashamed of. The television responds instantly to our actions, which is evident from the first tests with the controller in hand. In 120 Hz mode, the input lag drops to around 7 ms, meaning almost immediate reaction – shots, passes, or precise movements of the stick are instantly reflected on the screen. For 60 Hz content, the result slightly increases to just under 15 ms, but it still remains within the full comfort zone. An interesting feature is the Dolby Vision mode for gaming, which on the QNED93A works with the Xbox Series X console. Here, the lag increases to about 20 ms. In theory, this could be considered a deterioration, but in practice, it's still a very good result. Even with such a demanding picture standard, gameplay remains dynamic, and the differences in control are practically imperceptible.

When it comes to response speed, the LG NANO81A performs exceptionally well. The input lag we measured is around 12 ms. This is a very low level, which for a gamer means one thing – the delay between moving the stick on the controller and the reaction on the screen is practically unnoticeable. The television excels in dynamic titles where every millisecond counts, and in this respect, it does not fall short of significantly more expensive models.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
Yes
Font clarity
Good
Very Good
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
7ms
12ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
No

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

A new feature in this year's model is full support for 144 Hz refresh rates, which PC gamers will appreciate. The QNED93A works with both Nvidia graphics cards, offering compatibility with G-Sync, and AMD products, where it operates with FreeSync Premium Pro. Thanks to this, gameplay is smooth, without screen tearing or stuttering, and the panel performs very well in dynamic e-sports titles and demanding AAA games.

Equally important is the clarity of the image for everyday work. The TV supports chroma 4:4:4, so fonts in Windows and apps are sharp and clear. However, we noticed a minor detail – with a dark background and bright letters, subtle horizontal stripes may appear due to the arrangement of subpixels. This is a minor detail that does not affect the comfort of using the TV on a daily basis, but perfectionists may notice it after prolonged text interaction. However, we don’t think anyone would want to work on a 55-inch screen from less than 1 metre away 😉.

Nano81A is a really solid monitor for text work. Thanks to the IPS panel and proper implementation of Chroma 4:4:4, the fonts are very clear and sharp – practically everyone will be satisfied with how this screen performs as a monitor. We only noticed one small detail that we picked up during our laboratory scrutiny: the vertical lines of dark text are slightly darker than the horizontal ones. However, this is such a minimal phenomenon that we did not decide to deduct points for it. The scores only went down with features typically for PC gamers – there was a lack of G-Sync support and high refresh rates above 60 Hz, which will be a significant downside for those looking for a screen for dynamic gaming on the computer.

Viewing angles

2.9/10

6.1/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
78%
66%

QNED93A uses a VA panel, and that means one thing: the category of viewing angles becomes its Achilles' heel. Already at a tilt of around 45 degrees, brightness drops by up to 80%, and colours start to noticeably fade. This is the natural price for the high contrast offered by VA panels. There is no additional coating to improve angles, as is found in some more expensive models, so the QNED93A looks best when viewed head-on. If you’re planning a large family viewing, where some viewers will sit further to the side, you need to be aware that the image won't be as attractive as it is in the centre of the screen.

This is the moment when the LG NANO81A can finally "breathe" and make up for the points lost in the black and contrast categories. Due to the use of an IPS panel, the viewing angles here are simply very good. It is in this section that the tested model gains the most and clearly shows its advantage over competing televisions equipped with VA panels. In practice, this means that the image does not lose quality even when viewed at a large angle. This makes the NANO81A a great choice for people who have a wide furniture layout in their living room or often watch matches and movies with a larger group.

Daytime performance

6.2/10

4/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

LG NANO81A / NANO80A : 247 cd/m2

LG QNED93A / QNED90A: 546 cd/m2

LG QNED93A uses a satin matrix, which moderately deals with reflection suppression. It is definitely not at the level of matte screens, but it does not have the feeling of a mirrored surface like models with a glossy finish. This means that reflections are not as distracting, and the colours maintain their intensity even when light from the window hits the screen. The brightness is also a plus. The average level in HDR mode hovers around 550–600 nits. This means that the TV performs well in well-lit rooms, and you can enjoy viewing even when watching movies during the day, with only partially closed blinds. As a large screen in the living room, the QNED93A performs really well.

NANO81A is a relatively dark television, so it works best in rooms where you have control over the lighting. With a brightness of around 250 nits, it's hard to recommend it with a clear conscience for very bright, heavily sunlit lounges – in such conditions, the picture will simply lack punch. Nonetheless, LG deserves a small plus for the screen finish. The satin matrix used here quite effectively suppresses reflections. As a result, even if there is a bit of light in the room, you won't see reflections of every detail from your surroundings on the screen. So, if you can slightly close the blinds, a daytime viewing experience will definitely be possible, but this model simply wasn’t designed to "fight" full sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
White LED
Software version during testing
33.20.74
33.21.62
Image processor

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV Panel details
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A TV Panel details

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

LG NANO81A / NANO80A

TV features

8.2/10

6.6/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features
Review LG NANO81A / NANO80A  TV features

Smart Features

QNED93A runs on webOS, one of the most enjoyable Smart TV systems. It comes equipped with AirPlay, Screen Mirroring, Chromecast, and convenient voice control. The platform is fairly intuitive and generally quick, though in the tested unit, there were moments when the response to the remote's touch required a moment of "thought". However, it’s hard to classify this as a serious issue – webOS remains a refined system and will likely receive further updates that will enhance it.

Classic Features

In this model, LG didn't include the old Magic remote with a numeric keypad, but the TV performs excellently as a screen for daily viewing of antenna channels. The EPG interface is clear, the TV offers a TV guide, and we have the option to record programs from the built-in tuners directly to a USB drive. Everything works correctly and intuitively. We just missed the PiP functionality, which is offered by only two manufacturers in 2025.

Magic Remote

The Magic Remote is still the biggest difference compared to the competition. In 2025, it underwent a slight redesign – it has fewer buttons and resembles some of the minimalist remotes from Samsung. However, the cursor remains key, functioning like a magic wand. Just move your hand, and the pointer on the screen follows your movement. It’s incredibly simple yet very convenient. Navigation in the menu or entering passwords is significantly quicker, and it’s hard to switch back to traditional buttons afterwards.

Smart Features: WebOS

One of the greatest advantages of the NANO81A model is its “brain,” that is, the operating system. LG has implemented a full-fledged WebOS version for 2025, which in terms of fluidity and usability is on par with the more expensive models from this brand. Applications launch smoothly, and navigating the menu is a pure pleasure - there’s no sign of the annoying stutters often found in budget competitors. This is all thanks to the unique remote with a pointer (cursor) function, which has undergone a visual overhaul this year. The manufacturer has opted for minimalism - the new Magic remote is significantly smaller and more ergonomic than its predecessors. It fits perfectly in the hand, but this change has a downside as well. The physical number section has completely disappeared from the casing. For younger users, accustomed to streaming and selecting tiles, this will be no problem. However, older household members, who are used to entering channel numbers from memory, will have to change their long-standing habits.

Everyday Use

In terms of features that we would call “classic,” the NANO81A relies on tried-and-true standards. It is not a multimedia powerhouse that will surprise you with exotic additions, but in everyday television use, it performs flawlessly. The operation of traditional terrestrial or cable television, including even the old good Teletext, is correct and intuitive. Wireless communication also deserves praise. The Bluetooth module works very reliably, allowing for quick and stable connections to a game console controller or wireless headphones and speakers. It’s simply a television that “works” – it is stable, predictable, and does not cause unnecessary complications in daily use.

Apps

9.1/10

9.1/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.8/10

8.2/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
No
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
No
24 Mpix
Yes
No
28 Mpix
Yes
No
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the LG QNED93A handles most popular video and audio formats with ease, so it’s more than sufficient for basic use. However, during testing, we noticed two minor hiccups. The first is the lack of support for HEIC files, which are Apple’s photo format. The manufacturer claims that the TV should open them, but we couldn't confirm this in practice. The second issue concerned text files with subtitles in TXT format. Fortunately, other more common subtitle formats worked without any problems, so it’s hard to consider this a significant limitation in everyday use.

Many users still rely on their own USB drives to display movies or photos on a large screen. In this respect, the NANO81A performs quite decently – the built-in player supports a wide range of video and audio codecs, so most movie libraries will fire up "straight away". However, it's important to remember the specifics of the WebOS system. Since it is a closed environment, we are stuck with what the manufacturer has provided for us. There is no option to install alternative players (like the popular VLC), so if the system player can't handle something, there isn't much that can be done about it. During testing, we encountered a few specific limitations. Firstly, there is a lack of support for HEIC files. If you take photos with an iPhone and want to view them directly from a USB drive, the TV simply won't see them – it's worth changing the save format to JPG on the phone right away. We also noticed that the player struggles with processing very large graphic files. Photos with a resolution of around 20–28 Mpix may not load or may cause system errors. Aside from these exceptions, everyday multimedia handling is hassle-free.

Sound

6.9/10

6.2/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    81dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

LG QNED93A sounds quite pleasant for built-in speakers in a television. The sound is fairly clear, and at moderate volume levels, vocals and dialogue come through distinctly. The bass, as is often the case in relatively slim designs, isn't the strongest, but its presence is noticeable and is more than sufficient for daily TV show watching. The maximum volume reaches around 81 dB and doesn't lead to significant distortions, although during more demanding cinematic scenes, it's evident that the system has its limitations. Overall, the sound can be described as adequate and not off-putting. It definitely won't compete with a soundbar, but it won't ruin your movie experience either.

In terms of audio, the LG NANO81A is surprisingly good compared to its higher-end brother, the QNED80A model. Interestingly, the NanoCell performs slightly better, likely due to its somewhat thicker casing. The increased volume allows for the extraction of any low-frequency nuances – while the bass may not be powerful, it is more clearly defined than in thinner constructions. However, one shouldn’t expect miracles. It’s still a standard 2.0 speaker setup with a total power of 20 W, so the overall sound characteristic remains similar to other models in this price range. The mid and high tones are decent, making dialogues in films and news programs clear. While this slight improvement in the lower registers is appreciated, for true home theatre or listening to music, it’s still worth considering the addition of even a simple soundbar.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

81dBC (Max)

75dBC