LG QNED93A / QNED90A vs Dreame S100

Direct comparison

QNED93A / QNED90A

Info

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”85”

Available screen sizes: 55”65”75”

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD IPS

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2026

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

7.3

6.8

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    6.8

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    6.9

    6.2

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    6.8

    6.8

  • Gaming on console

    8.5

    7.5

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    7.6

  • Watching in bright light

    6.2

    6.0

  • Utility functions

    8.2

    5.9

  • Apps

    9.1

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    6.9

    8.3

Advantages

  • Pretty good contrast

  • High number of dimming zones

  • Good HDR brightness (around 1400 nits)

  • Wide colour gamut coverage (around 96% DCI-P3)

  • 144 Hz mode and a full set of features for gamers (HDMI 2.1, VRR, ALLM, G-Sync, FreeSync, HGiG, Game Bar)

  • Low input lag (7 ms at 120 Hz)

  • Good compatibility with PC, including 144 Hz and clear fonts

  • WebOS with a rich selection of apps and voice control

  • Magic remote

  • Quite effective upscaling and image processing tools - works great for older content like free-to-air TV or YouTube

  • Great viewing angles (thanks to the ADS panel)

  • Pretty good blacks thanks to Mini-LED backlighting

  • Good colours thanks to the PFS filter (advertised as QLED)

  • High motion fluidity (144 Hz panel)

  • Low input lag (in game mode)

  • A lot of gaming features, including two HDMI 2.1 ports (VRR, ALLM, and Game Bar)

  • Google TV system with a rich library of apps

  • Good sound thanks to the built-in “soundbar”

Disadvantages

No like
  • Local dimming algorithms need refinement

  • Very average viewing angles

  • Dolby Vision does not bring a noticeable improvement over HDR10

  • Underdeveloped local dimming algorithms (can cause annoying brightness drops)

  • Outdated image processor and poor digital processing of the Google TV system

  • Software bugs, occasional stuttering

  • Useless Filmmaker mode (completely blocks any changes to picture settings)

  • Poor HDR format implementation in games (no HGiG support and high input lag in Dolby Vision mode)

Our verdict

LG QNED93A is a television that at first glance appears to be a solid step forward compared to previous LCD models from this brand. On paper, we get a lot: significantly more dimming zones, 144 Hz refresh rate for gamers, support for all HDR formats, including Dolby Vision, and WebOS with a new Magic remote, which remains one of the most user-friendly control systems. The QNED93A shines most brightly in gaming applications. Four fully-fledged HDMI 2.1 ports allow you to connect consoles and computers without any limitations, and the low input lag is maintained at both 120 and 60 Hz. For PC gamers, an additional advantage will be the 144 Hz mode and full compatibility with G-Sync and FreeSync. So it can confidently be said that in terms of features for gamers, the QNED93A doesn't have any complexes compared to the competition. Another strong point is WebOS. LG's system has been regarded for years as one of the most user-friendly in everyday use, and this is confirmed here. Everything is clear, and the Magic remote allows you to operate the TV like a mouse pointer – quickly and intuitively. Brightness is also a plus. At its peak, it managed to achieve results close to 1400 nits. This is enough for the image to not wash out in brighter rooms and for special effects in movies or games to look convincing. The image processor handles upscaling older content well – television or films in lower resolutions appear clearer and sharper than on many competing screens.

However, it cannot be hidden that the biggest problem with the QNED93A is the local dimming algorithms. In scenes full of blacks, the screen can darken significantly, causing many details to simply vanish. The effect is such that the contrast looks better at first glance, but at the cost of information that should be visible. An additional problem is the Dolby Vision mode, which usually improves certain aspects of screens, but in this case changes very little. The differences between dynamic and static metadata have to be literally searched for with a magnifying glass. This is simply disappointing because the hardware's number of dimming zones and stronger backlighting provide the basis for a better effect. So who is the LG QNED93A for? It is a television that will work excellently as a home entertainment centre, especially if you’re thinking about gaming on consoles or PCs. In everyday watching of TV and films in well-lit conditions, it will also provide a lot of satisfaction thanks to its high brightness and decent image processor. However, one must accept that in scenes with a lot of black and full utilization of HDR, this model does not measure up to its competitors. LG has shown that it can create a very solid LCD screen, but it is also evident that not everything has been refined as it has in their OLED televisions.

Dreame S100 is a successful, though still somewhat rough debut in the Mini-LED segment. Hardware-wise, the TV stands up for itself: Mini-LED technology with local dimming provides a deep and appealing black for the average viewer, and the IPS/ADS panel offers brilliant viewing angles. This is an interesting combination, as it is extremely rare in the LCD TV segment, which will certainly please those with wide living rooms or large corner sofas. If we add to this a full gaming package (HDMI 2.1, 144 Hz), the Google TV system with an almost endless number of apps, and very strong 4.1.2 audio with 70 W power, which performs well above the market average, we have an incredibly versatile screen.

Where's the catch? In the software. Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 suffers from typical “growing pains” – the outdated processor struggles with advanced digital processing, and the local dimming algorithms can be frustrating in more demanding scenes. Additionally, the Google TV system itself can occasionally experience slight stutters. So if you're looking for a well-equipped Mini-LED for a wide living room and are willing to overlook its minor system hiccups that the manufacturer can hopefully fix with future updates – this is a very interesting option. The hardware potential is huge, although the software still needs some final polishing.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 (40Gbps)
Other inputs
RCA (Chinch)
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Good
Good
Stand type
Central
Central
Bezel color
Graphite
Black
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

7.3/10

5.9/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 308 (14 x 22)

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 160 (10 x 16)

Contrast:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

130,500:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

30,950:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

15,250:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

6,750:1

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Contrast and black detail

Result

4,600:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

32,850:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

11,800:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

6,900:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

2,650:1

Review Dreame S100 Contrast and black detail

Result

1,700:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

We took a close look at the 55-inch version of the LG QNED93A, featuring a high-contrast VA panel. However, for Mini-LED TVs, it’s not just the panel itself but primarily the number and performance of the local dimming zones that determine the final effect. In this model, we counted an impressive 308 zones right off the bat. In comparison, last year’s QNED91T in the 65-inch variant had only about 160. The difference is huge and shows that LG has made a significant step forward in this technology. On paper, it looks great, but in practice, enthusiasm quickly cools. The contrast in the QNED93A can indeed be impressive – bright elements are clearly separated from the blacks, and in many scenes, the depth effect is a real delight for the eyes. The problem is that despite such a significant improvement in the backlighting design, the results aren’t much better than last year’s model. The algorithms controlling the dimming can be overly aggressive. This is especially evident in darker sequences, where the screen dims to the point that subtle details vanish from view. Many viewers will appreciate the stronger blacks, but it’s hard to ignore that this comes at the expense of the director's intentions. The most problematic scenes turn out to be those with many small, bright elements. It is precisely then that the typical halo effects, or luminous halos, associated with LCDs and local zone dimming appear around them. While this phenomenon doesn’t completely ruin the experience, it serves as a reminder that even with an increased number of zones, local dimming still has its limitations. Ultimately, the contrast in the QNED93A can be considered good, but we feel that the manufacturer didn’t put in enough effort in optimising the new model in terms of blacks and contrast.

The Dreame S100 is a Mini-LED television that features an IPS/ADS panel in its 65" version. This type of panel doesn't inherently offer the best contrast on the market, but thanks to a fairly dense Mini-LED backlight, the black levels in this model are actually quite impressive. In less demanding scenes, the contrast can reach values of 30,000:1. This is a result several times higher and practically impossible to achieve for any type of LCD panel without local dimming technology. This means that the black levels and contrast in the S100 will be quite appealing for the less demanding viewer.

Unfortunately, in more challenging scenes where a considerable number of small elements appear against a black background, the local dimming algorithms in the Dreame S100 don't perform perfectly. The TV can either dim excessively, making the blacks really deep but rendering almost nothing visible on the screen, or go the other way – showcasing a vast amount of detail, but resulting in very poor contrast. The blacks in very demanding scenes around bright objects then take on a greyish hue (halo effect). This is a typical limitation of Mini-LED televisions in the lower and mid-range segments, and unfortunately, the Dreame S100 is no exception, doing particularly poorly in this regard. However, it should be noted that overall, the contrast and black levels here are definitely better than those found in LCD televisions without any form of local dimming technology.

HDR effect quality

5.8/10

3.4/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 95.1%, Bt.2020: 77.1%
DCI P3: 94.6%, Bt.2020: 71.6%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1330 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

219 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

678 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

160 nit

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A Brightness measurement

Result

1016 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

503 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

71 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

241 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

42 nit

Review Dreame S100 Brightness measurement

Result

589 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

Dreame S100

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

Although the number of local dimming zones in the LG QNED93A hasn’t directly translated to noticeably better contrast, it’s hard to deny this model one thing – it’s brighter than its predecessor. In synthetic tests, we recorded values around 1400-1500 nits, and more importantly, these results are reflected in real film scenes. In full-screen sequences flooded with whites or bright lights, the screen was able to maintain high luminance, providing a truly decent amazing HDR effect. Unfortunately, where the TV could show true class, that is in scenes requiring precision, all the magic dissipates. The dimming algorithms we mentioned earlier operate aggressively enough that small, bright objects – like distant lights, stars, or the moon – can almost completely disappear. Just look at the test scenes from the film Pan or Sicario 2 (screens 2 and 4) to see how subtle details are dimmed to the limits of their visibility. It’s a pity because a greater number of zones could theoretically translate to significantly better performance. Fortunately, there are also strong points. The QNED93A performs well in terms of colour gamut coverage, achieving around 96% of the DCI-P3 standard. As a result, colours in films look rich and full, and the image doesn’t lose intensity even in more demanding scenes. So, it can be said that the HDR in this model is solid, although the underdeveloped local dimming algorithms hinder its full potential.

The Dreame S100 is a relatively bright television. In movie mode, the brightness we measured reached around 600 nits. This is a really good result, although not the highest considering the competition in this price range. In full-screen scenes, it's clear that the television can generate an image that hits the mark in terms of brightness. Unfortunately, when more complex scenes appeared on the screen, the local dimming algorithm in this model tried above all to maintain the deepest blacks. However, this came at the expense of the HDR effect – and in a drastic way. In such scenes, the brightness of the bright elements fell below 100 nits, which is a downright tragic result, far from any HDR effect. This aspect can be improved, but there are caveats. You just need to change the local dimming setting in the television's menu; however, then the blacks in such scenes simply turn grey. It's a pity that Dreame wasn't able to refine the local dimming algorithms better, and the S100 is another example that the number of local dimming zones doesn't always translate into a better picture. As a consolation, it's worth noting that the Dreame S100 is marketed as a 'QLED' type television, although it actually uses a PFS LED filter. As a result, the colours are appropriately saturated, and our measured DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage exceeded 94%.

Factory color reproduction

6/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

In film mode (more specifically Filmmaker), the colour reproduction in the QNED93A was relatively accurate, although there were some reservations. In SDR content, the white balance leaned towards warmer tones, resulting in a slight yellowing across the entire screen. Gamma, on the other hand, led to a slight lightening of the image, making it look a bit less natural, especially in scenes that required precise shading (this is evident in the comparison photo). This isn't a problem that immediately stands out to every viewer, but more discerning individuals may feel that the image deviates from the intended aesthetic of the filmmakers. In HDR materials, the situation looked a bit different. The white balance here was quite good, ensuring that whites did not take on pink or unwanted green hues. However, the brightness management turned out to be an issue. An analysis of the EOTF curve revealed that at certain moments, the television could be distinctly too dark where it shouldn't be, losing some details and lowering the realism of scenes. This detracted from the HDR effects, which were theoretically meant to be the most impressive. For this reason, we decided to conduct a calibration.

We tested the Dreame S100 in "movie" mode and definitely recommend using this setting for watching all kinds of content. Interestingly, in the deeper settings of the TV, we also find a dedicated "Filmmaker" mode, which is now available from almost every manufacturer. However, in the case of the Dreame S100, we do not recommend using it – it blocks all settings related to the picture and does not allow for any configuration in the menu - not even a motion smoother. So how do the factory colours fare in the S100? Not too bad, but not great either. The TV itself had a noticeable blue tint, which is clearly evident in our white balance measurements. As a result, the picture was artificially brightened, and the colours had a slight bluish tint. This is also confirmed by the Color Checker palette, which showed how the colour samples leaned towards blue, generating quite significant colour errors. On the other hand, the picture looked definitely better in HDR mode, where the colour errors were not as prominent, although they were still far from ideal. Here, the white balance was also too heavily skewed towards blue, causing quite significant errors in color reproduction.

Color reproduction after calibration

7.8/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

After professional calibration, the Filmmaker mode in the QNED93A has improved primarily where it matters most in everyday use. We managed to straighten the white balance and eliminate the yellowish tint in SDR content, which is what we watch most often – television, streaming services, or standard quality movies. As a result, the colours look natural and pleasant, making the overall viewing experience significantly more comfortable. In HDR mode, we also made corrections, but here the biggest issue turned out to be the EOTF curve. Although LG provides some leeway in the settings, the television still controls brightness on its own terms. It's clear that the local dimming algorithms are not fully refined and can ruin the viewing experience by dimming parts of the picture at inappropriate moments. Nevertheless, it’s worth opting for calibration of this model, especially the mode intended for everyday viewing.

The Dreame S100 has proven to be a device very amenable to professional calibration. In its menu, we found a plethora of advanced options that allowed us to effectively correct factory errors. Thanks to the advanced white balance correction – both in SDR and HDR content – we completely eliminated excess blue components. The image instantly became much more natural and pleasant to view. After fully tuning the colours, the errors in the Color Checker test dropped below a Delta E value of 2-3. For the average viewer, this means that any colour distortions became almost impossible to see with the naked eye. It's really a nice surprise, as often new brands in the TV market have significant problems with the correct implementation and functioning of sliders in the calibration menu. Here, everything worked as it should. The only thing we need to criticise is the way the TV manages its brightness in HDR. Due to the specific nature of the local dimming algorithms, our measured EOTF curve shows anomalies. In places where high highlights should appear, there is a slight bump in the curve above the reference line. In practice, this results in unnatural brightening of certain, the brightest elements in movies or games. Despite this minor flaw, professional calibration brings a huge, very positive change to this model.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

8/10

8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The smoothness of tonal transitions in the LG QNED93A is really impressive. In most scenes, there are no visible artificial colour banding or posterisation effects. Dark scenes, in particular, are surprisingly good – many TVs struggle in these, but here the image remains smooth and consistent. In brighter sections, one can notice some slight colour blending, but it’s not pronounced enough to be distracting. However, during testing, we encountered a noticeable DSE effect, known as “dirty screen.” On our unit, this effect was strong enough that in bright scenes, the corners noticeably darkened, giving the impression of vignetting. This may be a defect of the test unit, but during intensive viewing, it was hard for us to overlook.

The transition between individual shades on the Dreame S100 is quite good. Analyzing most content in HDR10 format, we did not notice significant issues with banding. Only some very extreme and dark scenes revealed the problem of shade stepping. The situation is somewhat worse for content in Dolby Vision format*. Here, the colour gradation clearly deteriorates, and the tonal transitions from one colour to another are more visible and stand out from each other. Thus, the rating of this element on our site is slightly lower when we take into account viewing (on streaming platforms) in this format.

*we'll add the photos after modifying the site 😉

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

7.8/10

4/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
OK

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

The LG QNED93A turns out to be a very solid television for everyday use. Its image processor performs excellently with upscaling, making even older films or free-to-air television sharper and more detailed. During the screening of 'The Godfather,' it’s clearly visible how upscaling brings out additional details from the image – the characters’ faces and the texture of their clothing look significantly clearer than in the original material.

The digital image processing also deserves praise. The television is equipped with a function that reduces unwanted colour banding and screen irregularities. It works best in the 'Medium' setting – subtly smoothing tonal transitions without overly interfering with the image. This way, the natural film grain is preserved, and the screen does not appear artificially smooth. Perhaps in some scenes, slight colour banding can still be noticed, but in practice, the effect is more advantageous than with a stronger intervention from the algorithm.

For scaling and digital processing in the Dreame S100, the technology used is proudly called Dreamind™ Pro AI by the manufacturer. However, it must be clearly stated that this is not a proprietary processor but rather a marketing term for a chip from MediaTek – specifically, the model MT5889. Unfortunately, we are talking about a rather outdated unit from a time when MediaTek lagged significantly behind the competition in terms of performance. This, unfortunately, has a direct impact on the image, as this chip also handles that. The upscaling in the S100 is fairly average, and the processor has a tendency to artificially over-sharpen edges (fortunately, this can be somewhat tempered with the sharpness slider in the menu). In the options, we also find a feature called "Contour Smoothing," which theoretically is supposed to improve tonal transitions. In practice, it contributes almost no improvement – setting it to any level rarely eliminates visible colour banding, but it can unnecessarily blur elements of the image that should remain sharp.

Another issue is the phenomenon of overscan (cropping the edges of the frame), which is practically visible all the time. Although there is the possibility to set the screen to display the full frame in low-resolution materials, it requires activating the aforementioned Filmmaker mode. And as you may know, this mode completely blocks any changes to other sliders in the picture menu. In our test tables, we noted that the television offers an option to disable overscan, as such a function technically exists in the system – however, in everyday use, while maintaining reasonable picture settings, you will not be able to take advantage of it.

Blur and motion smoothness

7.6/10

7.7/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
144Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
OK
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
-
No
Brightness drop with BFI
56%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur (4K@144Hz):

Blur (4K@144Hz):

LG QNED93A has been equipped with a 144 Hz panel. This is primarily a nod to gamers, but the fact that higher refresh rates are increasingly appearing in televisions can be viewed positively. In everyday viewing, 120 Hz remains key, and in this regard, the QNED93A performs well. The manufacturer also provides the option to adjust the picture thanks to the TruMotion system – the De-Judder and De-Blur sliders allow you to choose between a cinematic motion feel with visible frames and full smoothing with theatrical motion.

When it comes to motion fluidity, the Dreame S100 performs really well. It features a 144 Hz refresh rate panel, although in reality, the vast majority of people using it in a conventional way will still be limited to 120 Hz (as this is what today's hardware allows aside from PCs). Thanks to the high refresh rate, the image in motion remains really sharp, largely due to the well-functioning MEMC motion smoother. In the menu, we find predefined modes that enable the TV to efficiently generate artificial frames, which effectively enhances the fluidity of dynamic sports shots, but also helps eliminate motion judder in film and TV series material recorded at 24 frames.

Console compatibility and gaming features

9.8/10

7.8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    48 - 144Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Warning Yes, high input lag
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    No
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

LG QNED93A is a television that has undoubtedly been designed with gamers in mind. Right from the start, we get a complete package – all four HDMI ports operate in 2.1 standard, so whether we connect a console, a PC, or a receiver, we have full compatibility. This is important because many manufacturers still limit themselves to two ports, and here nothing stands in the way of having maximum capabilities for all the equipment. There’s also an automatic game mode (ALLM), which automatically switches the television to the appropriate settings when the console is turned on, as well as variable refresh rate (VRR). This means the image doesn’t stutter or glitch, even when the frame rate drops – whether in dynamic shooters or during races.

The 144 Hz panel gives an additional advantage in computer games. While 120 Hz is enough for consoles, the QNED93A allows PCs to push even more – every movement, every glance to the side is refreshed faster, which makes a difference especially in e-sports. The manufacturer also considered HDR in games – the television supports HGiG mode, which are guidelines intended to ensure that the lighting effects are exactly as the game developers intended. To top it off, we get Game Bar – a special information bar called up on the screen that shows parameters in real time. You can check the frame rate, active VRR functions, or input lag levels. This solution is useful not only for settings enthusiasts but for anyone who wants to quickly check what mode the television is operating in and whether everything is working as it should.

The Dreame S100 seems almost like the ideal screen for gamers. The television is equipped with 2 HDMI 2.1 ports with a bandwidth of 40 Gbps, allowing features such as automatic game mode (ALLM) or VRR frame synchronization in the range of 48-144 Hz to work seamlessly on consoles. On board, we also find a well-designed gaming panel (Game Bar). It allows you to continuously preview the most important parameters - from the activated picture modes, to the number of frames rendered by the console, right through to the option of adding a crosshair in the centre of the screen. All of this looks great on paper; however, the biggest issue with the S100 is its implementation of HDR in games. The television does not have a correctly implemented HGiG format. This means a clueless user may misconfigure the console during the initial setup of the screen. Poor configuration can result in an image that is too dark or overexposed (as a guideline: we suggest setting the brightness in the Xbox console menu to around 600 nits, and in the PS5 to 12 clicks). The Dolby Vision format also proves problematic, as it often did not activate at all on the XBOX – Dreame S100 line. And when it was eventually activated, playing was impossible due to the very high input lag often exceeding 100ms. If the manufacturer manages to improve the HDR gaming experience with an update, the S100 will be truly outstanding hardware for gamers. For now, however, compromises must be accepted.

Input lag

9.8/10

9.2/10

SDR

1080p60
16 ms
15 ms
1080p120
7 ms
6 ms
2160p60
16 ms
15 ms
2160p120
7 ms
6 ms

HDR

2160p60
15 ms
15 ms
2160p120
7 ms
6 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
21 ms
127 ms
2160p120 DV
7 ms
18 ms

In the delay field, the LG QNED93A has nothing to be ashamed of. The television responds instantly to our actions, which is evident from the first tests with the controller in hand. In 120 Hz mode, the input lag drops to around 7 ms, meaning almost immediate reaction – shots, passes, or precise movements of the stick are instantly reflected on the screen. For 60 Hz content, the result slightly increases to just under 15 ms, but it still remains within the full comfort zone. An interesting feature is the Dolby Vision mode for gaming, which on the QNED93A works with the Xbox Series X console. Here, the lag increases to about 20 ms. In theory, this could be considered a deterioration, but in practice, it's still a very good result. Even with such a demanding picture standard, gameplay remains dynamic, and the differences in control are practically imperceptible.

Aside from the previously mentioned issue with Dolby Vision, the input lag on the Dreame S100 is really very low. Values of around 5-6 ms at a refresh rate of 120 Hz and 12-15 ms for 60 Hz are such excellent results that even a professional gamer won't be able to feel any delay during gameplay. The response to movements on the controller is almost instantaneous here.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

7.6/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Average
Readability of dark text and shapes
Good
Very Good
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
7ms
6ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
BGR
RGB
Max refresh rate
144Hz
144Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

A new feature in this year's model is full support for 144 Hz refresh rates, which PC gamers will appreciate. The QNED93A works with both Nvidia graphics cards, offering compatibility with G-Sync, and AMD products, where it operates with FreeSync Premium Pro. Thanks to this, gameplay is smooth, without screen tearing or stuttering, and the panel performs very well in dynamic e-sports titles and demanding AAA games.

Equally important is the clarity of the image for everyday work. The TV supports chroma 4:4:4, so fonts in Windows and apps are sharp and clear. However, we noticed a minor detail – with a dark background and bright letters, subtle horizontal stripes may appear due to the arrangement of subpixels. This is a minor detail that does not affect the comfort of using the TV on a daily basis, but perfectionists may notice it after prolonged text interaction. However, we don’t think anyone would want to work on a 55-inch screen from less than 1 metre away 😉.

The Dreame S100 works well as a large gaming monitor. It has a 144 Hz refresh rate and easily supports G-Sync and FreeSync. However, problems arise when you want to use it for text work. Due to a software bug, the TV struggles with full colour sampling (Chroma 4:4:4) at 120 Hz and 144 Hz refresh rates, resulting in blurry fonts. To make the text perfectly sharp, you need to manually lower the refresh rate to 60 Hz in Windows. This is quite an annoying solution that forces constant jumping between settings if you want to use this screen for both work and gaming.

Viewing angles

2.9/10

6.6/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
78%
68%

QNED93A uses a VA panel, and that means one thing: the category of viewing angles becomes its Achilles' heel. Already at a tilt of around 45 degrees, brightness drops by up to 80%, and colours start to noticeably fade. This is the natural price for the high contrast offered by VA panels. There is no additional coating to improve angles, as is found in some more expensive models, so the QNED93A looks best when viewed head-on. If you’re planning a large family viewing, where some viewers will sit further to the side, you need to be aware that the image won't be as attractive as it is in the centre of the screen.

The viewing angles on the Dreame S100 are really good, thanks to the ADS panel. Unlike VA panels, this type of screen allows you to watch the image from a wide angle without noticeable loss of colour saturation and brightness. This comes at the expense of worse native contrast, but for most viewers (especially those with a wide couch) this will be quite a good compromise. There is a lack of Mini-LED TVs with good viewing angles at a reasonable price on the market today, so the S100 nicely fills this niche.

Daytime performance

6.2/10

6/10

Panel finish
Satin
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Decent
Black levels during daytime
Good
Good

Panel brightness

Dreame S100: 463 cd/m2

LG QNED93A / QNED90A: 546 cd/m2

LG QNED93A uses a satin matrix, which moderately deals with reflection suppression. It is definitely not at the level of matte screens, but it does not have the feeling of a mirrored surface like models with a glossy finish. This means that reflections are not as distracting, and the colours maintain their intensity even when light from the window hits the screen. The brightness is also a plus. The average level in HDR mode hovers around 550–600 nits. This means that the TV performs well in well-lit rooms, and you can enjoy viewing even when watching movies during the day, with only partially closed blinds. As a large screen in the living room, the QNED93A performs really well.

The Dreame S100 works well in most living rooms during the day. The television is equipped with a satin screen coating – while it may not perfectly eliminate reflections, it does a great job of preserving colour saturation, which doesn’t fade when the room is bright. In terms of pure brightness, the S100 has a moderately bright screen. It can reach about 600 nits peak in SDR format. This level allows it to be placed in typically sunlit rooms, although – let’s be honest – it’s not a brightness demon, and it may struggle a bit with direct, harsh sunlight.

Panel details

Backlight Type
Mini-LED QLED
Mini-LED PFS LED
Software version during testing
33.20.74
RTMA.250416.179
Image processor
mt5889 3GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV Panel details
Review Dreame S100 TV Panel details
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV Panel details
Review Dreame S100 TV Panel details

LG QNED93A / QNED90A

Dreame S100

TV features

8.2/10

5.9/10

  • System
    WebOS
    Google TV
  • System performance
    Decent
    Decent
  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    1 x HDMI 2.0, 2 x HDMI 2.1 40Gbps
  • Other inputs
    RCA (Chinch)
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    No
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    No

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    No
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review LG QNED93A / QNED90A TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features
Review Dreame S100 TV features

Sound connection options

  • HDMI audio
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Other audio outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio)
    Toslink (Optical audio), Mini-Jack (Headphones)
  • Wireless audio
    Bluetooth
    Bluetooth

Supported audio formats (external HDMI eARC audio):

  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

Senior accessibility

  • Numeric keyboard on TV
    No
    Yes
  • Font size adjustment
    No
    No
  • Audio description
    Yes
    Yes

Smart Features

QNED93A runs on webOS, one of the most enjoyable Smart TV systems. It comes equipped with AirPlay, Screen Mirroring, Chromecast, and convenient voice control. The platform is fairly intuitive and generally quick, though in the tested unit, there were moments when the response to the remote's touch required a moment of "thought". However, it’s hard to classify this as a serious issue – webOS remains a refined system and will likely receive further updates that will enhance it.

Classic Features

In this model, LG didn't include the old Magic remote with a numeric keypad, but the TV performs excellently as a screen for daily viewing of antenna channels. The EPG interface is clear, the TV offers a TV guide, and we have the option to record programs from the built-in tuners directly to a USB drive. Everything works correctly and intuitively. We just missed the PiP functionality, which is offered by only two manufacturers in 2025.

Magic Remote

The Magic Remote is still the biggest difference compared to the competition. In 2025, it underwent a slight redesign – it has fewer buttons and resembles some of the minimalist remotes from Samsung. However, the cursor remains key, functioning like a magic wand. Just move your hand, and the pointer on the screen follows your movement. It’s incredibly simple yet very convenient. Navigation in the menu or entering passwords is significantly quicker, and it’s hard to switch back to traditional buttons afterwards.

Smart TV: Google TV

Dreame S100 uses the Google TV operating system. This is great news for anyone looking for a television with access to almost all streaming apps on the market. The system itself runs quite smoothly, although it does experience slight stutters now and then – which is par for the course in most Chinese TVs with Google software. On board, we find almost every necessary Smart TV feature, including screen mirroring and voice search using Google Assistant. Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 lacks support for AirPlay, making it difficult for iPhone users to easily share content from their phones.

Television Features

Unfortunately, the Dreame S100 is not a television designed for traditional TV viewers. Aside from basic options like connecting headphones and a rather simple remote control equipped with a numeric keypad, there are practically no additional features to facilitate the daily viewing of traditional channels. The only pleasant and increasingly rare addition is the presence of a physical minijack headphone output. This allows for connecting older wired headphones or analogue audio sets.

Apps

9.1/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
No
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce NOW
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

8.8/10

8.3/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
No
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
No
TIFF
No
No
BMP
Yes
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The built-in media player in the LG QNED93A handles most popular video and audio formats with ease, so it’s more than sufficient for basic use. However, during testing, we noticed two minor hiccups. The first is the lack of support for HEIC files, which are Apple’s photo format. The manufacturer claims that the TV should open them, but we couldn't confirm this in practice. The second issue concerned text files with subtitles in TXT format. Fortunately, other more common subtitle formats worked without any problems, so it’s hard to consider this a significant limitation in everyday use.

The built-in media player works well and handled most files we provided from our USB drive without any issues. However, there were times when the app experienced slight stutters, and selected movies or photos only loaded after a few seconds. If the factory player turns out to be not very intuitive or lacks advanced features, the Google TV system saves the day. You just need to go to the app store and install any external media playback program (e.g. VLC) that will resolve this issue.

Sound

6.9/10

8.3/10

  • Maximum volume
    81dB
    84dB
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    No
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    No
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    No
    No
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    No
    No

LG QNED93A sounds quite pleasant for built-in speakers in a television. The sound is fairly clear, and at moderate volume levels, vocals and dialogue come through distinctly. The bass, as is often the case in relatively slim designs, isn't the strongest, but its presence is noticeable and is more than sufficient for daily TV show watching. The maximum volume reaches around 81 dB and doesn't lead to significant distortions, although during more demanding cinematic scenes, it's evident that the system has its limitations. Overall, the sound can be described as adequate and not off-putting. It definitely won't compete with a soundbar, but it won't ruin your movie experience either.

The sound quality of the Dreame S100 is one of the biggest advantages of this model – it's really good. The TV is equipped with a 4.1.2 speaker system with a total power of 70 W. The sound is clear, with a noticeably defined bass, which is confirmed by our acoustic measurements. The large drivers positioned on the sides of the casing effectively widen the soundstage. As a result, we get a noticeably more spacious sound compared to standard 20-watt 2.0 systems. The device supports Dolby Atmos encoding, so we can easily play spatial audio tracks from streaming platforms without the need to purchase an external soundbar. Unfortunately, it lacks support for the DTS format – that's a downside, although it must be honestly admitted that this standard is increasingly being abandoned by most manufacturers. On the plus side, the audio connection options are good. The Dreame S100 can be easily connected to newer home theatres or soundbars via the HDMI eARC port or optical output. A nice and increasingly rare addition is the classic minijack headphone socket, which allows older audio sets to gain a new life.

Sound Quality Test

No sound test video

Acoustic Measurements

81dBC (Max)

75dBC

84dBC (Max)

75dBC