LG OLED C4 vs TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Direct comparison

C45 / C41

Info

C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

Info

Available screen sizes: 42”48”55”65”77”83”

Available screen sizes: 50”55”65”75”

Panel type: WRGB OLED

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: WebOS

Model year: 2024

Complete the survey to find out the result

Panel type: LCD VA

Resolution: 3840x2160

System: Google TV

Model year: 2025

Complete the survey to find out the result

Overall rating

8.2

6.4

  • Movies and series in UHD quality

    8.2

    5.9

  • Classic TV, YouTube

    8.8

    6.1

  • Sports broadcasts (TV and apps)

    8.6

    5.3

  • Gaming on console

    9.3

    7.7

  • TV as a computer monitor

    8.6

    1.7

  • Watching in bright light

    5.7

    6.6

  • Utility functions

    8.9

    7.0

  • Apps

    9.1

    9.6

  • Sound quality

    7.5

    6.5

Advantages

  • High efficiency in HDR materials

  • Very good colour reproduction after calibration

  • Faithfulness of image with directorial vision

  • Excellent collaboration with consoles and PCs - low input lag, multitude of conveniences

  • Advanced motion smoothing system

  • Very good contrast and black level: VA panel and MINI-LED backlighting

  • Quite high (around 600 nits)

  • Many features for gamers: VRR, ALLM, HGiG

  • Additional gaming mode: 120Hz and 144Hz

  • Google TV system with a wide selection of applications

  • Support for multiple HDR formats including Dolby Vision

  • Support for Dolby Atmos and DTS

  • Quite pleasant sound from built-in speakers

Disadvantages

No like
  • Sometimes visible tonal transitions

  • The panel has heavy blooming

  • Strong visible dithering (looks like artificial 4K)

  • Very poor compatibility with PC

  • Minor system errors

  • Lots of chaos in naming (many derivative models that are no different)

Our verdict

LG C4 is a television that will likely have no competition in its price range for many users. Thanks to the wide options for purchase, it will appeal to those looking for a TV strictly for movies and series, as well as for gaming. The advanced WebOS system and a remote that works like a mouse will certainly make everyday use much easier and ensure that we will likely stick with this brand for a much longer time. The OLED panel implemented by the manufacturer, resulting from over 10 years of history, shows that it has not yet said its last word. Brightness results in HDR material are very solid and can display an incredibly dynamic and deep image. Here, it’s worth mentioning the excellently implemented dynamic tone mapping feature, which makes HDR10 images look almost as good as Dolby Vision. And if we’re talking about fidelity to artistic vision, we can't forget about how calibratable LG TVs are, allowing for a great deal of freedom for the calibrator and classic calibration for home users, as well as 3D LUT for professionals. However, if we are looking for a gaming TV, then the LG C4, like most of the manufacturer’s OLED TVs, will be the ideal choice. With the implementation of HDMI 2.1 ports and the full use of their potential, we can enjoy extremely smooth gameplay with all the benefits, such as VRR, ALLM, FreeSync, or G-Sync. Of course, the panel, which has a maximum refresh rate of 144 Hz and an advanced smoothing technology, will also allow for very smooth and sharp images during broadcasts of various sporting events. It’s hard not to give a high rating to LG OLED C4, as it's difficult to find a TV in a similar price range with such advanced features among the competition.

TCL C6KS (also known as C69KS and Q6CS) is a television that on paper promised to be a hit in the "value for money" category. And indeed, in many respects, it's a successful piece of equipment: thanks to the Mini-LED backlighting, we get good blacks and brightness that rivals more expensive models. In fact, it’s identical to that of the slightly pricier C6K, which we have already tested for you. Additionally, it features the same excellent Google TV system and surprisingly rich features for gamers, which make it enjoyable to play on, even with a 60 Hz panel. Unfortunately, the good impression is marred by the performance of the panel used. The television struggles with noticeable motion blur, and aggressive dithering (digital noise) makes the image often look unnatural and artificial – as if it has been unnaturally sharpened. Ultimately, the biggest problem with the C6KS is not its flaws but its sibling, the C6K. At its current price, this model is in a strange "in-between" position. It costs almost the same (or only slightly less) than the full-fledged TCL C6K, which offers a significantly better 120 Hz panel and is simply a complete construction without those annoying issues. The C6KS is a compromise model that will only become attractive under one condition – if its price drops drastically. For now, the much safer and better choice remains to pay the (often nominal) extra for the C6K model. One could jokingly assert that the letter "S" in the name actually stands for "Slim". However, it's not about an exceptionally slim body, but how much this model has been "slimmed down" in terms of features compared to the fully-fledged C6K.

TV appearance

HDMI inputs
0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 (48Gbps)
3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
Other inputs
Outputs
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
Network Interfaces
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
Build quality
Premium
Good
Stand type
Central
Legs
Bezel color
Silver
Graphite
Stand
Fixed
Fixed
Flat design
No
Yes
Accessories
Stand
Stand

Contrast and black detail

10/10

7.5/10

Local dimming function: Yes, number of zones: 180 (10 x 18)

Contrast:

Review LG OLED C4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review LG OLED C4 Contrast and black detail

Result

:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

129,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

26,650:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,900:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

12,600:1

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Contrast and black detail

Result

6,250:1

Halo effect and black detail visibility:

Check the visibility of bright lights on a dark background. Mini-LEDs often struggle with this. The photo does not compare black levels – that’s what the video below is for.

The video accurately shows differences in contrast and black levels between TVs, as well as potential issues: halo around bright objects or Mini-LED zone operation visible as brightness jumps.

LG OLED C4, as the name suggests, uses an organic panel of its own production. This series definitely belongs to one of the most recognisable on the market. Over 10 years of experience in building self-emissive panels has allowed for the refinement of each subsequent design, with the models from the 2024 range being the quintessence of this process. Of course, the use of this type of screen enables the achievement of flawless contrast and blacks, allowing viewers to immerse themselves in the world created by the director. This is possible thanks to the OLED panel, characterised by the absence of conventional backlighting, which instead allows current to pass through organic pixels. This permits super-accurate image control, thereby eliminating issues such as dimming of delicate fine details or the halo/blooming effect. Looking at both of our test scenes, we can notice two things: perfect light separation and a plethora of details in the movie "Sicario 2".

Let's move on to what tigers like best, which is black and contrast. If you were worried that the lower price of the C6KS model (C69KS/Q6CS) was due to drastic cuts in image quality, I have great news for you regarding black levels and contrast. In direct comparison with the more expensive C6K, the tested model is almost on par with it. Just like in the higher series, we find here a VA panel supported by a local dimming system. What’s most interesting – and here’s a big surprise – during the tests we counted exactly the same number of dimming zones (in the same size) in the C6KS as in the more expensive counterpart! The black level is very good. The contrast measurement results speak for themselves – for such a relatively inexpensive television, the black is deep and free from major flaws that often plague budget models without local dimming. Of course, we can't defy physics. One must reckon that in very demanding scenes (e.g., bright text on a black background), we may sometimes notice undesirable effects, such as blooming (the halo effect around bright objects). However, this is not something that disqualifies this television – generally, the black level here is at a very decent, satisfying level.

HDR effect quality

6.8/10

4.9/10

Supported formats
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG
Color gamut coverage
DCI P3: 99.0%, Bt.2020: 75.0%
DCI P3: 92.0%, Bt.2020: 71.0%

Luminance measurements in HDR:

Review LG OLED C4 Brightness measurement

Result

796 nit

Review LG OLED C4 Brightness measurement

Result

772 nit

Review LG OLED C4 Brightness measurement

Result

869 nit

Review LG OLED C4 Brightness measurement

Result

837 nit

Review LG OLED C4 Brightness measurement

Result

604 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

602 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

204 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

421 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

152 nit

Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS Brightness measurement

Result

590 nit

Scene from the movie “Pan” (about 2800 nits)

Scene from the movie “Billy Lynn” (about 1100 nits)

The photos show two HDR10 movies. 'Pan' is one of the brightest productions ever made, while 'Billy Lynn' (soldier) has brightness typical of streaming (Netflix, Prime, HBO MAX). Notice the intensity of effects and detail in whites.

Static HDR10

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

Dynamic: Dolby Vision

The photos present the visibility of white details in various HDR formats. They do not show brightness differences between TVs (these can be compared in the previous gallery).

HDR luminance chart:

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

LG OLED C4

Luminance of RGB colors

The results of HDR materials are definitely among the better ones. Practically every film significantly exceeds the 700 nits barrier, which allows for a very realistic image. Of course, none of them surpasses the magical thousand, however, the combination of such results along with unlimited contrast and black effectively boosts the visual outcome. The last of the scenes, featuring a fullscreen sun burst, is indeed less bright than the others, although it still represents a respectable level. It's also worth mentioning the excellent coverage of the DCI-P3 colour palette, which will enable the achievement of exceptionally vivid colours.

And what about HDR? Here the C6KS performs quite well and – as is becoming the theme of this review – just like in the C6K model. The maximum brightness generated by this television is around 600 nits. In bright scenes, this translates to a really solid, cinematic effect and generally, video materials look good here. However, it's important to keep in mind the specifics of the dimming algorithm in this model. When very small, bright points (e.g. stars) appear on a dark background, the television can quite significantly dim them. The goal is simple: to eliminate blooming and maintain the best possible black. It's a reasonable compromise. Most viewers will definitely appreciate deep, “true black” more than additional microscopic details, the display of which could cause the screen to appear greyed out. Such is the nature of local dimming technology in this price range, and one must be aware of this. It’s also worth noting that the TCL C69KS (C6KS) has an additional PFS coating, which is marketed under the QLED technology slogan. Thanks to this, the colours are saturated and vibrant – our measurements showed that the coverage of a wide colour gamut reaches as much as 92%.

Factory color reproduction

8.1/10

5/10

This gallery shows how colors change after professional TV calibration. If you notice the difference, we recommend ordering this service at SkalibrujTV.com.

Factory Mode

After calibration

The best factory mode implemented in the tested television was "Filmmaker". That was the one we used during all tests. This mode, in terms of colour reproduction, turned out to be quite decent, although other flaws effectively detracted from the enjoyment of the viewing experience. Starting with the most basic one, which is white balance, it was easy to notice that this was marked by a dominance of red, which completely altered the characteristics of the picture. We could see a strong yellowing of the whites and a shift of all colours to warmer tones. The gamma, which is a graph as equally important, if not more so, was quite severely reduced, resulting in a significant drop in contrast, except for the start of the graph, where the television insidiously lost details. That’s all regarding SDR materials. Looking closely at films with a wide dynamic range, we can observe exactly the same phenomenon of white balance yellowing as in films with a standard colour palette. The EOTF curve, which replaces the gamma chart for us, is practically perfect and cannot be faulted.

In contrast to the more expensive C6K model, in the tested C6KS we don't find an option in the menu labelled as Filmmaker Mode. Is this a reason to cry? Absolutely not. Our tests showed that in practice, in terms of colour reproduction, the lack of this specific label makes virtually no difference. The best available Film/Cinema mode here offers an almost identical picture profile to the aforementioned Filmmaker in the more expensive model. So we get a very similar image, just under a different name. Therefore, if you were wondering whether paying extra for the C6K would give you better colours – the answer is: no, in both cases the base is the same and requires slight adjustments.

Color reproduction after calibration

9.5/10

7.5/10

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

The photos show how movies look on the TV. Pay attention to black detail visibility, colors, and shadow tint.

As we mentioned earlier, LG televisions are equipped with advanced tools for carrying out the calibration process. We used them to model the picture in line with what the director envisioned. And without modesty, we must admit that we achieved this phenomenally. Both SDR and HDR materials present a level that clearly indicates this is how a film should look. It's worth taking a look at the colour errors on the "ColorChecker" palette, where practically none of them exceed "1", except for two samples.

Thanks to the white balance adjustment, the C69KS's tendency to distort colours has been effectively limited, leading to a very good final effect. After calibration, we will no longer see excessive warmth in SDR scenes or overly cool tones in HDR. However, it is worth noting the brightness characteristic. In SDR content, there are hardly any objections – the image looks very good, especially in older films, TV shows, or YouTube materials. Evaluating the television's performance in HDR is much more difficult. Analysis of the EOTF curve suggests correct behaviour, but its practical variant shows certain limitations. The C69KS can overly brighten the smallest elements of the frame, while at other times it can dim the entire scene. Calibration has therefore brought clear benefits in terms of colour, but certain limitations resulting from local dimming and the way it is controlled by the C69KS cannot be avoided, which we also observed in the C6K test.

Smoothness of tonal transitions

7.1/10

4.8/10

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

These are selected scenes that show smooth tonal transitions from one color to another. If you see distinct banding, it’s the TV panel’s fault.

The fluidity of tonal transitions in LG televisions has always been a rather sensitive issue, as the manufacturer, despite impeccable performance in other areas, has almost always struggled to get this right. The evaluation results for the fluidity of tonal transitions in the tested television were quite good, with issues mainly visible in darker scenes, such as the last two scenes. Interestingly, this is a significantly better result than the highest model from the manufacturer, namely the LG G4.

When looking solely at the fluidity of tonal transitions, the C69KS provides no real reasons for complaint. The gradation of colours is appropriate, and more challenging sequences do not reveal any significant issues. However, you may be surprised by the low rating in this category. This is due to very strong dithering and artificially boosted "resolution," which lead to a grainy and unnatural character of the image. For this reason, the final rating is significantly lower, despite the correct gradation of the tonal transitions themselves.

Image scaling and smoothness of tonal transitions

8/10

5/10

Image without overscan on the SD signal
OK
OK
Smooth transition function
OK
No

Smooth transition function

The match photo shows how the TV smooths weak tonal transitions in low-quality video.

Image scaling SD (576i)

The model photo shows how it handles upscaling of SD material.

Once again, we will take a look at the feature responsible for gentle gradation, but we will also address the one that aims to enhance the quality of lower-quality materials. The default smoothing of tonal transitions, as we could see, was not the worst, but it can be improved further. The function has a slider that allows us to adjust its intensity. We recommend using the former, as it produces very good results and does not blur important details.

Image scaling on LG C4 is quite good, however, it cannot be said to be without flaws. The image is slightly sharper by default, although not in a very noticeable way. While jagged edges of trees can be seen, it is not a major issue when compared to other manufacturers.

The C69KS handles upscaling quite well. The tested 576p content looks surprisingly decent – a considerable amount of detail is preserved, and the algorithm adds a subtle ‘rounding’ effect to sharp edges, making the image appear more cohesive. However, it doesn't perform as well when it comes to smoothing tonal transitions. The television practically cannot improve them, leaving the image in a rather raw state. With older materials, this can be simply exhausting, as the lack of additional processing highlights all imperfections.

Blur and motion smoothness

8.5/10

4.9/10

Maximum refresh rate of the panel
144Hz
60Hz
Film motion smoothing option
OK
OK
Blur reduction option
OK
No
BFI function 60Hz
Yes, 60Hz (image flickers)
No
BFI function 120Hz
No
No
Brightness drop with BFI
49%
-%

Blur (native resolution, maximum refresh rate):

Blur (BFI function enabled):

Image flickers in this mode

Blur ():

Blur (4K@144Hz):

The maximum refresh rate we can set on the LG G4 is 144 Hz. Naturally, this is only possible when connecting the TV to a very powerful PC. Otherwise, we will operate at a maximum refresh rate of 120 Hz, which is recommended if we primarily want to watch sports or content with a lot of motion dynamics. For those who require high fluidity of the image, the manufacturer has implemented a multi-level motion smoother called "TrueMotion". It has been divided into two separate sliders that adjust the sharpness of moving images (De-Blur) and judder (De-Judder). Both sliders can be set in the range of 0 to 10, with each degree affecting the level of smoothing, allowing everyone to find their sweet spot.

The panel of the LG OLED C4 features an average response time of less than 1 ms (which directly results from our measurements), enabling the achievement of an extremely clear image, unattainable for LCD TVs, which can have response times of up to several milliseconds. This is clearly evident in the images from the "UFO Test," which show no trailing blur behind the object.

C69KS offers a simplified motion enhancement panel in movies, allowing users to adjust the intensity of the effect using a slider. This makes it easy to tailor the smoothness to personal preferences. It also deserves credit for the ability to utilise higher refresh rates – even though the panel operates natively in 4K at 60 Hz, by lowering the resolution to 1440p, modes of 120 and 144 Hz can be enabled, on both consoles and PC. This sounds like great news, however, in practice, the image at these settings trails exceptionally badly. The effect is so pronounced that the overall experience simply appears mediocre and loses its appeal in everyday use.

Console compatibility and gaming features

10/10

8/10

  • ALLM
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR
    Yes
    Yes
  • VRR range
    40 - 144Hz
    48 - 144Hz
  • Dolby Vision Game Mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Correct implementation of HGIG
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1080p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 1440p@120Hz
    Yes
    Yes
  • 4K@120Hz
    Yes
    No
  • Game bar
    Yes
    Yes

We can now say that LG C4, like practically every OLED television from the manufacturer, is exceptionally good in terms of cooperation with consoles and PCs. Thanks to the implementation of four full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports at 48 Gbps, the manufacturer has embedded all the features that enhance gaming comfort, including simultaneous support for FreeSync and G-Sync technologies. With such a tandem, players with graphics cards from AMD or nVidia can safely choose C4. However, what should please gamers demanding the highest possible quality the most is the simultaneous implementation of HDR Dolby Vision and HGIG mode. The former is particularly important as it operates with extremely low input lag in all settings.

A standard feature in televisions from the Korean manufacturer is also the implementation of GameBar, allowing for quick adjustments of settings "on the fly," without the need to exit the game. It also allows for image adjustments for people with visual impairments, which is an incredibly nice touch. Another important piece of information is that when VRR technology is enabled, we won’t experience a drop in contrast. This is, of course, due to the design of the panel and the absence of conventional backlighting. It is, however, normal for shades of grey to flicker slightly, although this is a characteristic feature of this function regardless of the manufacturer and television.

In summary: LG C4, just like all the manufacturer's OLEDs equipped with high-refresh-rate panels and HDMI 2.1 connections, creates a harmonious whole with consoles. In practice, it is a complete television, and if we expect the highest possible efficiency in gaming, C4 will be an ideal choice.

If we overlook the smudging and lack of native 4K at 120 Hz, the C69KS is impressive in how well it performs for gaming. You get everything you would expect from a gaming TV: Variable Refresh Rate (VRR), Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM), Dolby Vision Gaming mode, and a consistently functioning HGiG. The TV can also operate at 120 or even 144 Hz at lower resolutions, making gameplay on console or PC smoother. Additionally, there's a clear Game Bar that allows you to quickly check key settings while gaming. As a result — despite a few limitations — the C69KS can be a genuinely successful screen for gamers.

Input lag

10/10

10/10

SDR

1080p60
13 ms
9 ms
1080p120
5 ms
2160p60
13 ms
9 ms
2160p120
5 ms

HDR

2160p60
13 ms
9 ms
2160p120
5 ms
4320p60

Dolby Vision

2160p60 DV
13 ms
9 ms
2160p120 DV
5 ms

The latency time of LG C4 is remarkably low in every scenario. Even the most avid gamers will surely appreciate the very low input lag at demanding 4K 120 Hz settings with HDR, which is only 5 ms. It's also worth noting that the lag at these same settings, but with Dolby Vision HDR enabled, remains unchanged, which is not so obvious with the competition. Therefore, it deserves the highest rating and recommendation.

TCL C6KS performs very well here — the latency drops below 10 ms, which means responses in games are instantaneous. This is an excellent result in this class and definitely good news for those playing dynamic titles.

Compatibility with PC

8.6/10

1.7/10

Chroma 444 (max. resolution and refresh rate)
Yes
No
Font clarity
Good
Poor
Readability of dark text and shapes
Very Good
Poor
Input lag in PC mode (4K, max. refresh rate)
5ms
9ms
Matrix subpixel arrangement
RWGB
BGR
Max refresh rate
144Hz
60Hz
G-Sync
Yes
Yes

The photo shows the legibility of small fonts. Ideally, lines should be the same thickness on both light and dark text, with minimal pixel gaps.

LG C4 combined with a PC works wonderfully, thanks to its very low latency of just 13.5 ms, which is practically instantaneous feedback between the mouse, eye, and screen. An extremely important aspect when working on a screen is the readability of text, which in the case of the tested TV is very good. However, it is worth noting that to achieve sharp fonts, you need to enable the passthrough option in the settings.

The RWBG pixel layout does not significantly affect the display of fonts or letters, which is a significant advantage over Samsung's QD-OLED panels. Users of both Windows-based PCs and macOS will surely be pleased with their experience on the tested TV screen.

Aside from the previously mentioned ability to work at 144 Hz at lower resolutions, the C6KS offers nothing that would encourage its use as a monitor. The fonts look really poor — the darkest ones have a distinct, rainbow halo, and the standard text is surrounded by strange artifacts. The effect is noticeable enough that prolonged work at the computer can be simply tiring.

Viewing angles

7.5/10

2.7/10

Brightness drop at an angle of 45 degrees
25%
80%

The undisputed advantage of OLED panels is their efficiency in the context of group viewing, meaning from various angles. LG C4 maintains very good contrast, colour saturation, and fidelity. Although this isn't a result of organic TVs supported by MLA technology, it's fair to say that anyone who purchased the device was satisfied with the results obtained. However, it should be noted that at sharp angles a slight greenish tint can be observed. This is a characteristic feature of WRGB panels from LG, without the aforementioned micro-lens technology, and unfortunately, there's nothing that can be done about it.

The viewing angles in the C6KS are very poor, typical of VA panels. It’s a compromise we pay for by choosing high contrast — head-on, the image looks good, but any significant deviation quickly causes drops in brightness and saturation.

Daytime performance

5.7/10

6.6/10

Panel finish
Glare
Satin
Reflection suppression
Decent
Good
Black levels during daytime
Very Good
Very Good

Panel brightness

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS: 527 cd/m2

LG OLED C4: 367 cd/m2

The maximum brightness of the television in SDR materials is 367 nits. For an OLED television, this is a very good result and allows for quite comfortable viewing during the day. It's worth noting two things. Thanks to the glossy coating of the panel, the light reflections are well held in place and do not spill over the rest of the panel. The second issue is the brightness of the screen when fully filled with white, oscillating around 220 nits, which is a remarkable result, as until recently, OLED televisions in this category could only boast brightness half as much. As a result, the conditions for watching, for example, winter sports will be very good.

The C6KS performs really well as a TV screen for daytime viewing. Its brightness of around 500–600 nits easily cuts through challenging lighting conditions. Additionally, it features a satin finish that effectively reduces reflections. As a result, the TV impresses during daytime viewing, even in brighter rooms.

Panel details

Backlight Type
PFS LED
Software version during testing
03.11.05
Image processor
RTD6748 2GB RAM

Subpixel Structure:

Panel uniformity and thermal imaging:

Review LG OLED C4 TV Panel details
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV Panel details

LG OLED C4

TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS

TV features

8.9/10

7/10

  • HDMI inputs
    0 x HDMI 2.0, 4 x HDMI 2.1 48Gbps
    3 x HDMI 2.0, 0 x HDMI 2.1
  • Outputs
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
    Toslink (Optical audio), eARC (HDMI), ARC (HDMI)
  • Network Interfaces
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
    Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Wi-Fi 5GHz, Ethernet (LAN) 100Mbps
  • TV reception
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C
    DVB-T, DVB-T2, DVB-S, DVB-S2, DVB-C

Classic features:

  • Recording to USB (terrestrial TV)
    Yes
    No
  • Recording programming
    Yes
    No
  • Picture in Picture (PiP)
    No
    No
  • RF remote control (no need to aim)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Backlit remote control
    No
    No
  • Teletext
    Yes
    Yes
  • Audio only mode
    Yes
    Yes
  • Bluetooth headphones support
    Yes
    Yes
  • Simultaneous Bluetooth headphones & TV audio
    Yes
    Yes

Smart features:

  • AirPlay
    Yes
    Yes
  • Screen mirroring (Windows Miracast)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search
    Yes
    Yes
  • Voice search in native language
    Yes
    Yes
  • Ability to connect a keyboard and mouse
    Yes
    Yes
Review LG OLED C4 TV features
Review LG OLED C4 TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features
Review TCL C6KS / C69KS / Q6CS TV features

LG uses the well-known proprietary WebOS system that has been around for many years. The system offers virtually all the major apps, and the few that are missing can be counted on one hand, such as CDA or KODI. It's also worth noting that the modern web browser and the remote with a built-in mouse allow for convenient access to streaming services in this way, if there isn't a built-in app.

WebOS also features a highly praised ability to perform operations using a cursor that appears when the remote is moved. The convenience of this function is invaluable when entering queries or passwords for portals. WebOS, like most systems, also supports features such as screen mirroring, AirPlay, voice searching in Polish, and the ability to connect headphones via Bluetooth. On a more practical note, WebOS allows simultaneous use of headphones and the television speaker, which will certainly be a significant help for those with hearing impairments. One of the more interesting features, particularly appreciated by sports fans, is the ability to turn on an alert for an upcoming match, ensuring that we never miss a broadcast. The home panel also deserves praise, allowing for control of all smart devices connected to the home network. For example, the end of a wash cycle will be signalled by a notification in the top right corner.

In summary, the WebOS system, although less known and with certain limitations compared to Android TV, offers stable and quick performance and supports most functions that users may need. It is a solid solution for those looking for a simple and effective operating system in their television.

The biggest advantage of the C6KS is the Google TV system. It's an environment that offers a lot — ideal for those who value a wide selection of apps and convenient use of streaming services. AirPlay, screen sharing functionality, and the voice assistant work very well here, making daily use of the television simply convenient.

The support for traditional television is somewhat lacking. Users who are counting on extensive "TV" features may feel overlooked. Besides the smoothly functioning Bluetooth remote with a numeric keypad, we won't find conveniences like USB recording or PiP functionality here.

Apps

9.1/10

9.6/10

OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
No
Kodi
OK
Apple_music
No
Eleven_sports
OK
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
OK
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
No
Steam Link
OK
Disney_Plus
OK
Amazon_Prime_Video
OK
Player_TVN
OK
Polsat_Box_Go
OK
Canal_Plus_Online
OK
TVP_VOD
OK
Apple_TV_Plus
OK
SkyShowtime
OK
Rakuten
OK
CDA_Premium_Browser
OK
Spotify
OK
Tidal
OK
Netflix
OK
YouTube
OK
HBO_MAX
OK
Kodi
No
Apple_music
OK
Eleven_sports
No
Xbox Game Pass
OK
GeForce Now!
No
Amazon Luna
OK
Boosteroid
OK
Steam Link

Playing files from USB

9.3/10

8.9/10

Supported photo formats:

JPEG
Yes
Yes
HEIC
Yes
No
PNG
Yes
Yes
GIF
No
Yes
WebP
No
Yes
TIFF
No
No
BMP
No
Yes
SVG
No
No

Maximum photo resolution:

4 Mpix
Yes
Yes
6 Mpix
Yes
Yes
8 Mpix
Yes
Yes
10 Mpix
Yes
Yes
12 Mpix
Yes
Yes
16 Mpix
Yes
Yes
20 Mpix
Yes
Yes
24 Mpix
Yes
Yes
28 Mpix
Yes
Yes
32 Mpix
Yes
Yes

The default file player on LG C4 handles all photo resolutions exceptionally well. It successfully plays videos recorded in practically all the most popular formats, including Dolby Vision. The only codec that the C4 won't play is H.266 VVC, although this is currently rather uncommon. It's a pity that subtitles in .txt format are not supported. Attention should be paid to the supported photo formats, of which there are only three: JPEG, PNG, and, importantly for Apple phone users - HEIC. However, the tested television cannot be faulted for a lack of variety in audio files, which can be played without a compatibility warning.

The system player really does a great job and smoothly handles popular formats. The only hiccup appears with files from the Apple ecosystem (e.g., HEIC) – here TCL just gives up. Fortunately, a huge plus of Google TV is that you can install your own app, e.g., VLC. This way, you can quickly patch up the shortcomings of the factory player and play practically any material, customizing the TV to your needs.

Sound

7.5/10

6.5/10

  • Maximum volume
    -
    -
  • Dolby Digital Plus 7.1
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby True HD 7.1
    Yes
    No
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby Digital Plus (JOC)
    Yes
    Yes
  • Dolby Atmos in Dolby True HD
    Yes
    No
  • DTS:X in DTS-HD MA
    Yes
    Yes
  • DTS-HD Master Audio
    Yes
    Yes

The audio system implemented in LG C4 is very well tuned, allowing us to experience strong bass as well as balanced mid and high tones. We can confidently say that in its price range, it's one of the better sounding televisions. However, we believe that those deciding to purchase the C4 will already have a dedicated audio set. The presence of DTS-HD Master Audio and Dolby Atmos codecs will also be significant.

The TCL C6KS performs almost identically to the C6K model, as it uses the same speaker set branded by Onkyo. For a TV of this class, the sound is quite good — you can even feel a slightly defined bass, which is not common in the budget segments. However, it's worth keeping the proper perspective in mind. This bass is decent compared to other TVs, but a home theatre system or even a basic soundbar will offer a much fuller, more dynamic sound. The C6KS will therefore be suitable for regular TV viewing, but if someone is after a stronger sound, additional audio equipment will be the natural choice.