Hisense S7NQ Canvas TV is a very interesting option, especially for those who are looking for something in the style of a picture-TV but don't want to spend a fortune. At first glance, it stands out primarily because the gallery mode with artwork is completely free – there’s no subscription fee, unlike Samsung's The Frame. Moreover, the box includes a light brown frame right away, which will be an extra bonus and saving for many people. Although it is primarily a TV for displaying art, it surprisingly performs quite well in other applications as well. The 144 Hz panel, full HDMI 2.1, support for VRR and ALLM – all of this makes gaming on consoles entirely possible and quite enjoyable. The Vidaa system runs smoothly, and we find all the most important apps and features here, such as AirPlay, USB recording, or screen mirroring from your phone. But there are also things that fall a bit short. First and foremost – the actual images. Compared to The Frame from Samsung, they simply look more digital here. There's a lack of that depth, paint texture, and subtle details that really impress with the competitor. Even though at first glance we’re dealing with a similar, matte panel, in practice, it performs much worse at suppressing reflections. Colours and blacks fade much quicker, especially in a bright room. This could also be the effect of lower brightness – Hisense is simply darker than its Korean rival. Additionally, there are some minor software flaws – e.g., the lack of displaying external subtitles despite the option to configure them, or the not entirely effective image smoothing function with lower quality materials. In short: the S7NQ is a good TV in the form of a "picture" that can be a great alternative for those who don’t mind the lower quality of displayed artworks but value the absence of subscription fees, an extra frame in the package, and the full functionality of a typical TV. It's not an ideal product, but a reasonable compromise for Samsung The Frame.
The Sony Bravia 2 II is a TV that’s best suited to simple, everyday use. And we suspect many people will pick it mainly for Google TV. The system gives access to a huge number of apps and streaming services, and you also get Chromecast, AirPlay and convenient voice search. The TV itself may not run as fast as pricier Sony models, but in terms of functionality there’s little to complain about. Importantly, for regular viewing the picture quality is quite decent. The Bravia 2 II handles SDR material especially well — ordinary broadcast TV, YouTube and a lot of older films and series. The out-of-the-box Cinema mode is sensibly tuned, colours look natural and, without much fiddling with the settings, you can just start watching. And that’s where the Bravia 2 II shows its strengths — as a simple smart TV for daily use, rather than a set that aims to dazzle with panel performance.
However, you have to remember that the “Bravia” badge on the case doesn’t automatically mean great picture quality. The Bravia 2 II uses an IPS panel with very low contrast, and that’s its biggest problem. In daylight it’s not so noticeable, but turn the lights off in the evening and black starts to look more like dark grey. Of course, in return you get good viewing angles, so if the TV sits in a large living room and several people watch from different spots, IPS has an advantage. But that comes at the cost of weak blacks. This TV isn’t designed for HDR impact or for more demanding gamers either. Around 300 nits of brightness and a narrow colour gamut mean HDR content doesn’t show much more than SDR. A 60 Hz panel and the lack of broader gaming features also make it clear that gaming isn’t a priority for this model.
And that wouldn’t be a major issue, because we expected that from an entry-level Sony. The biggest problem for the Bravia 2 II, though, is the price. For similar money you can easily find competitor TVs, especially Korean and Chinese brands, that already offer a lot more, ranging from 120 Hz panels to Mini-LED backlights with local dimming. So the Bravia 2 II isn’t a bad TV in itself. It’s simply too expensive for what it offers. If its price were noticeably lower, it would make much more sense as a basic TV for everyday viewing.